USA v. Green
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2008-CR-0030 v. 5 5 JOHN DUANE GREEN, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Denise Hinds, Esq., AUSA Patricia Schrader-Cooke, Esq., AFPD ORDER DENYING UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO AMEND “ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR TRANSMISSION OF EVIDENCE” THIS MATTER came before the Court for consideration upon the Motion by the United States to Amend “Order Regarding Defendant’s Motion For Transmission of Evidence” to Permit the Return to Defendant or His Representative cell Phones Seized at Arrest (Docket No. 9). A hearing was held on January 9, 2009. The government was represented by Denise Hinds, Esq., AUSA. Patricia Schrader-Cooke, Esq., AFPD, appeared on behalf of Defendant. Being advised in the premises and being satisfied therein, the Court finds that compliance with the order at issue is not burdensome to the government and that the Case: 1:08-cr-00030-RLF-GWC Document #: 11 Filed: 01/09/09 Page 1 of 2 United States v. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cr-00030/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cr-00030-0.pdf
SHA-256 96f35734698ab0d930594026a0ed2342503ba5660cb61fcd37d37c62e588a7c1
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-96f35734698a
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2008-CR-0030 v. 5 5 JOHN DUANE GREEN, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Denise Hinds, Esq., AUSA Patricia Schrader-Cooke, Esq., AFPD ORDER DENYING UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO AMEND “ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR TRANSMISSION OF EVIDENCE” THIS MATTER came before the Court for consideration upon the Motion by the United States to Amend “Order Regarding Defendant’s Motion For Transmission of Evidence” to Permit the Return to Defendant or His Representative cell Phones Seized at Arrest (Docket No. 9). A hearing was held on January 9, 2009. The government was represented by Denise Hinds, Esq., AUSA. Patricia Schrader-Cooke, Esq., AFPD, appeared on behalf of Defendant. Being advised in the premises and being satisfied therein, the Court finds that compliance with the order at issue is not burdensome to the government and that the Case: 1:08-cr-00030-RLF-GWC Document #: 11 Filed: 01/09/09 Page 1 of 2 United States v. Green 2008-CR-0030 Order Denying United States’ Motion to Amend Order government has not shown how forwarding the cell phones to Defendant’s expert as ordered is prejudicial to the government or otherwise contrary to the interests of justice. WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion By the United States to Amend “Order Regarding Defendant’s Motion For Transmission of Evidence” to Permit the Return to Defendant or His Representative cell Phones Seized at Arrest (Docket No. 9) is DENIED. ENTER: Date: January 9, 2009 /s/ GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:08-cr-00030-RLF-GWC Document #: 11 Filed: 01/09/09 Page 2 of 2