VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

USA v. Lerburds et al

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Date
2018-06-25
Pages
3
Text
Native Text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. REYNALDO PIERRET LERBURDS, MICHAEL LEONARD, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2018-15 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Gretchen Shappert, United States Attorney Sigrid Tejo-Sprotte, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the United States of America, Jason Gonzalez-Delgado Hato Rey, PR For Reynaldo Pierret Lerburds, David J. Cattie Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoack & Stewart LLC St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For Michael Leonard. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court are the applications of Reynaldo Pierret Lerburds (“Lerburds”) and Michael Leonard (“Leonard”) to waive their speedy trials. For the reasons stated herein, the time to try this case is extended up to and including August 31, 2018. Case: 3:18-cr-00015-CVG-RM Document #: 28 Filed: 06/25/18 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Lerburds, et al. Criminal No. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_18-cr-00015/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_18-cr-00015-0.pdf

SHA-256 9773bd5171d6e065be790fcf2b22d71b3b2b67274d707139aa4ff63230a5c3b7

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-9773bd5171d6

Document text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. REYNALDO PIERRET LERBURDS, MICHAEL LEONARD, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2018-15 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Gretchen Shappert, United States Attorney Sigrid Tejo-Sprotte, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the United States of America, Jason Gonzalez-Delgado Hato Rey, PR For Reynaldo Pierret Lerburds, David J. Cattie Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoack & Stewart LLC St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For Michael Leonard. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court are the applications of Reynaldo Pierret Lerburds (“Lerburds”) and Michael Leonard (“Leonard”) to waive their speedy trials. For the reasons stated herein, the time to try this case is extended up to and including August 31, 2018. Case: 3:18-cr-00015-CVG-RM Document #: 28 Filed: 06/25/18 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Lerburds, et al. Criminal No. 2018-15 Order While the Speedy Trial Act requires that defendants be tried within seventy days of indictment, the Court specifically finds that extending this period would be in the best interest of justice for several reasons. First, an extension is necessary to allow Lerburds and Leonard time to review discovery and investigate the charges against them. Second, Lerburds and Leonard made their requests with the advice and consent of counsel. Third, without an extension, Lerburds and Leonard would be denied reasonable time necessary to explore plea options and prepare for trial. Consistent with these concerns, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has recognized that "whether or not a case is 'unusual' or 'complex,' an ‘ends of justice’ continuance may in appropriate circumstances be granted." United States v. Fields, 39 F.3d 439, 444 (3d Cir. 1994); United States v. Dota, 33 F.3d 1179(9th Cir. 1994) ("An ends of justice continuance may be justified on grounds that one side needs more time to prepare for trial [even if the] case [i]s not ‘complex.’"); see also United States v. Lattany, 982 F.2d 866, 883 (3d Cir. 1992) ("[T]he district court did not abuse its discretion when it delayed the trial to give counsel . . . opportunity to . . . decid[e] upon and prepar[e] an appropriate defense."); United States v. Brooks, 697 F.2d 517, 522 (3d Cir. Case: 3:18-cr-00015-CVG-RM Document #: 28 Filed: 06/25/18 Page 2 of 3 United States v. Lerburds, et al. Criminal No. 2018-15 Order 1982) (holding there was no abuse of discretion where district court found that multiple count, multiple defendant "case was complex and required additional time for adequate preparation."). The premises considered; it is hereby ORDERED that the time beginning from the date of this order granting an extension through August 31, 2018, shall be excluded in computing the time within which the trial for Reynaldo Pierret Lerburds and Michael Leonard must be initiated pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161. S\ Curtis V. Gómez District Judge Case: 3:18-cr-00015-CVG-RM Document #: 28 Filed: 06/25/18 Page 3 of 3