Memorandum regarding Tutu Wellfield Superfund Site, St. Thomas, USVI, Draft Proposed Plan
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION II ?ATE: W 15 5995 SUBJECT: Tutu Wellfield Superfund Site, St. Thomas, USVI Draft Proposed Plan FROM: Frank C. Brock, Acting Chief V^*^?- C Ground Water Management Section TO: Caroline Kwan, RPM New York/Caribbean Superfund Branch II In accordance with the Memorandum of Interdivisional Coordination between the Emergency and Remedial Response Division (ERRD) and the Water Management Division (WMD) and as requested in your memo of July 24, 1995, WMD has reviewed the above subject document from the perspective of the water programs. We have the following comments: WMD concurs with the preferred soil remediation alternatives (SRA 3/4: Institutional Controls/Capping/In-situ Soil Vapor Extraction /Excavation/Off-Site Disposal/On-Site Disposal) and the ground water remediation alternative(GWA 4: Institutional Controls/Source and Plume Containment/Treatment/Discharge) but with the following proviso: Well decommissioning, construction, and discharge procedures should be in accordance with state and federal requirements. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/02/65049
SHA-256 97c3913e9bd881ac4260863e054142c3f1cb0ed46ad2e3a766a1c45f9eedc829
Re-using this document
CERCLA administrative record
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-97c3913e9bd8
Document text
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION II ?ATE: W 15 5995 SUBJECT: Tutu Wellfield Superfund Site, St. Thomas, USVI Draft Proposed Plan FROM: Frank C. Brock, Acting Chief V^*^?- C Ground Water Management Section TO: Caroline Kwan, RPM New York/Caribbean Superfund Branch II In accordance with the Memorandum of Interdivisional Coordination between the Emergency and Remedial Response Division (ERRD) and the Water Management Division (WMD) and as requested in your memo of July 24, 1995, WMD has reviewed the above subject document from the perspective of the water programs. We have the following comments: WMD concurs with the preferred soil remediation alternatives (SRA 3/4: Institutional Controls/Capping/In-situ Soil Vapor Extraction /Excavation/Off-Site Disposal/On-Site Disposal) and the ground water remediation alternative(GWA 4: Institutional Controls/Source and Plume Containment/Treatment/Discharge) but with the following proviso: Well decommissioning, construction, and discharge procedures should be in accordance with state and federal requirements. If you have any questions, please contact Manuel Arbizu of my staff at extension 3816. cc: R. Hargrove, PM-EI REGION II FORM 1320-1 (9/85) *65049* 65049