VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

AIMERY N. DELAGARDE VS. ROY LESTER SCHNEIDER HOSPI, ST-12-CV-470 (V.I. 2013) [unpublished]

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
superior.vicourts.org
Kind
Court Record
Date
2013-06-06
Pages
3
Text
OCR Text

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN AIMERY N. DELAGARDE, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. ST-12-CV-470 ROY LESTER SCHNEIDER HOSPITAL, CENTRAL AIR, INC., JAMES L. ROSS, JOHN/JANE DOE, AND ABC, CORP., Defendants. lt i i i i a a a a MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendant Central Air, Inc.’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. For the following reasons, Central Air’s motion will be denied. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On August 28, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendants stemming from a slip and fall incident. In the Complaint, Plaintiff alleged that he slipped on water leaking from an air conditioning unit that Central Air failed to monitor and repair. On April 11, 2013, the parties entered into a “stipulation of partial discontinuance and withdrawal of Defendant Central Air.” The stipulation states that the causes of action against Central Air are dismissed “without further cost to either party.” Notwithstanding, Central Air now seeks attorneys’ fees and costs on the basis that Plaintiff's claims were frivolous. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://superior.vicourts.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_12810747/File/Opinions/Archive/MEMO-DUN-6-6.pdf

SHA-256 9ab4241880ef5f5a5c329894ca51e67effa838d8eb493a352d2bd61bfc679d3d

Re-using this document

edicts of government — judicial opinions are not copyrightable by anyone. NOT 17 USC 105 (territorial court, not federal) and NOT 'rights unstated'.

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-9ab4241880ef

Document text

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN AIMERY N. DELAGARDE, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. ST-12-CV-470 ROY LESTER SCHNEIDER HOSPITAL, CENTRAL AIR, INC., JAMES L. ROSS, JOHN/JANE DOE, AND ABC, CORP., Defendants. lt i i i i a a a a MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendant Central Air, Inc.’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. For the following reasons, Central Air’s motion will be denied. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On August 28, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendants stemming from a slip and fall incident. In the Complaint, Plaintiff alleged that he slipped on water leaking from an air conditioning unit that Central Air failed to monitor and repair. On April 11, 2013, the parties entered into a “stipulation of partial discontinuance and withdrawal of Defendant Central Air.” The stipulation states that the causes of action against Central Air are dismissed “without further cost to either party.” Notwithstanding, Central Air now seeks attorneys’ fees and costs on the basis that Plaintiff's claims were frivolous. ANALYSIS 5 V.LC. § 541 provides: Delagarde v. Roy Lester Schneider Hospital, et al. ST-12-CV-470 Memorandum Opinion, June 06, 2013 (a) Costs which may be allowed in a civil action include: (1) Fees of officers, witnesses, and jurors; (2) Necessary expenses of taking depositions which were reasonably necessary in the action; (3) Expenses of publication for the summons or notices, and the postage when they are served by mail; \ (4) Compensation of a master as provided in Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (5) Necessary expense of copying any public record, book, or document used as evidence in the trial; and (6) Attorney’s fees as provided in subsection (b) of this section. (b) The measure and mode of compensation of attorneys shall be left to the agreement, express or implied, of the parties; but there shall be allowed to the prevailing party in the judgment such sums as the court in its discretion may fix by way of indemnity for his attorney’s fees in maintaining the action or defenses thereto, provided, however, the award of attorney’s fees in personal injury cases is prohibited unless the court finds that the complaint filed ... is frivolous. ' Under 5 V.LC. § 541(b), a “prevailing party is considered to be the one in whose favor a decision or verdict is rendered and a judgment is rendered.”* Under 5 V.1.C. § 541(c), a frivolous claim is defined as one that lacks legal or factual merit or was raised to cause unnecessary delay or to harass. A judgment or judicial decision has not been rendered in Central Air’s favor, and “as a general rule, a defendant may not recover fees when a plaintiff dismisses an action with prejudice absent exceptional circumstances.” * Central Air’s proof that the claims against it were frivolous consists of allegations from counsel that Central Air “should never have been named as a party to this litigation” and that it “had no dealings with any "V1. Code Ann. tit. 5 §541 (1997). ? Melendez v. Rivera, 24 V.I. 63, 65 (Terr. Ct. 1988) (noting that the definition of prevailing party can be construed more broadly in some cases where “a party has achieved at least some of the benefits which were sought in the litigation, if a judgment is not finally obtained”). > Grand Union Supermarkets v. H.E. Lockhart Management, Inc., 2013 WL 163830, at *3 (D.V.1. 2013). Delagarde v. Roy Lester Schneider Hospital, et al ST-12-CV-470 Memorandum Opinion, June 06, 2013 24 of the parties hereto Central Air’s motion will be denied for failure to provide sufficient evidence to sustain a finding that Plaintiffs claims were frivolous An Order consistent with this Opinion shall follow oe Dated; / June L, 2013 ATTEST: Venetia Hl Vel DGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT "HONDA MICHAEL C. iat owen Kansan Mrcesy rt Court “Un Le WN i VIRGIN ISLANDS hela Tyso hele Sup isor bane Central Air’s motion, at page 2