Liles, Carol v. Revetaw, Inc
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN CAROL LILES, Plaintiff, v. REVETAW, INC., d/b/a WATER ISLAND FERRY, STEVE RAMPINO, and STEVE SCULLY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2003-88 ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES: Carol Liles, Water Island, U.S.V.I. Pro se plaintiff, James M. Derr, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For defendant Steve Rampino, Steve Scully St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Pro se defendant. ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. Before the Court is the motion of the plaintiff, Carol Liles (“Liles”) for reconsideration of this Court’s March 9, 2009, Order denying Liles’ motion for default judgment against defendant Revetaw, Inc. (“Revetaw”). Under Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.3 (“Local Rule 7.3"), a party may file a motion for reconsideration “within ten (10) Case: 3:03-cv-00088-JRS-RM Document #: 189 Filed: 04/13/09 Page 1 of 2 Liles v. Revetaw, Inc., et al. Civil No. 2003-88 Order days after the entry of the order or decision unless the time is extended by the Court.” LRCi 7.3. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_03-cv-00088/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_03-cv-00088-3.pdf
SHA-256 9cbe6124443743f775308b1db71f6358a92972a334cf0c1fa9d99063ba929aa3
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-9cbe61244437
Document text
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN CAROL LILES, Plaintiff, v. REVETAW, INC., d/b/a WATER ISLAND FERRY, STEVE RAMPINO, and STEVE SCULLY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2003-88 ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES: Carol Liles, Water Island, U.S.V.I. Pro se plaintiff, James M. Derr, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For defendant Steve Rampino, Steve Scully St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Pro se defendant. ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. Before the Court is the motion of the plaintiff, Carol Liles (“Liles”) for reconsideration of this Court’s March 9, 2009, Order denying Liles’ motion for default judgment against defendant Revetaw, Inc. (“Revetaw”). Under Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.3 (“Local Rule 7.3"), a party may file a motion for reconsideration “within ten (10) Case: 3:03-cv-00088-JRS-RM Document #: 189 Filed: 04/13/09 Page 1 of 2 Liles v. Revetaw, Inc., et al. Civil No. 2003-88 Order days after the entry of the order or decision unless the time is extended by the Court.” LRCi 7.3. Here, the deadline for filing a motion for reconsideration of the March 9, 2009, Order expired on March 23, 2009. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a); LRCi 6.1. Because Liles’ motion for reconsideration was not filed until April 2, 2009, the motion is untimely. Furthermore, Liles has not moved for leave to file her reconsideration motion out of time. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is DENIED. S\ Curtis V. Gómez Chief Judge Case: 3:03-cv-00088-JRS-RM Document #: 189 Filed: 04/13/09 Page 2 of 2