USVI Public Records

Document text (beginning — full text at the TXT link above)

i: r - ~T 'm\ •&*% NUS CORPORATION A Halliburton Company OO1 OOC>1 *64409* 64409 02-9102-11-HR REV. NO. 1 FINAL DRAFT HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION TUTU WELLFIELD ST. THOMAS, USVI VOLUME 1 OF 5 PREPARED UNDER TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE DOCUMENT NO. 02-9102-11 CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7346 FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AUGUST 28,1991 NUS CORPORATION SUPERFUND DIVISION SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED/APPROVED BY: RICHARD L FEINBERG I RONALD M. NAMAN PROJECT MANAGER , / FIT OFFICE MANAGER OO1 0002 SECTION I: SITE SUMMARY TUT 001 O003 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 SITE SUMMARY Tutu Wellfield is located in a mountainous semi-rural area of eastern central St. Thomas, U.S.V.I.. The site, is an area of groundwater contamination with known and unknown sources. The area of confirmed groundwater contamination, verified in 1990 by Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) sample analysis, covers approximately 17 acres. However, contamination may be spread over an approximate 50 acres in the area. The Tutu section of Anna's Retreat is located in the Upper Turpentine Run Basin. An intermittent stream leading to Turpentine Run is within a few hundred feet to the southwest. Turpentine Run is also intermittent and drains southward approximately 2.8 miles (when flowing) to Mangrove Lagoon which is hydraulically connected to the Caribbean Sea. The Atlantic Ocean lies approximately 1 mile to the north. In July 1987, a strong petroleum odor was detected in one of the several major commercially owned supply wells (the Tillet Well), which a provide public drinking water source throughout the island. The Virgin Island Department of Planning and Natural Resources (VIDPNR) requested assistance from the U.S. EPA in sampling this well and others in the area. From July through September in 1987 the U.S. EPA Technical Assistance Team (TAT), Roy F. West on, Inc. sampled over 100 hundred wells and cisterns. Analysis performed with photovac gas chromatograph instrumentation detected volatile and chlorinated hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene, 1,2-trans dichloroethylene, trichloroethylene (TCE), and tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in several wells, including public supply, institutional, commercial, and domestic wells. Samples were also sent to US EPA's Region 2 Environmental Services Laboratory for Total Organic Carbon which subsequently detected contamination in wells and also in the sample blank. Some of these compounds were detected above and below the maximum permissible concentration levels, 10-Day Health Advisory Levels, and Removal Action Levels. Thirteen commercial (including the Tillet Well) and five private wells were subsequently closed down and alternative plans including trucking water to the area began. As of January 6, 1988, VIDPNR has issued 10 orders to close down 16 wells. In July 1987, VIDPNR issued an Administrative Order on Consent to Tutu Texaco Service Station to investigate the release of petroleum from their underground storage tanks (USTs). In addition, Texaco was ordered to stop all work relative to disturbing the potentially contaminated area. In early August 1987, this Order was amended to include specific details required of the investigation (e.g. Sampling/Contingency Plan prior to tank excavation). In 1987, Tutu Esso Car Care Center was also issued a similar Administrative Order. In August 1987, nine Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) were identified by the U.S. EPA. In addition to Tutu Texaco and Tutu Esso, one other gasoline service station (Rodriguez Auto Parts), two vehicle maintenance repair stations (Ramsay Motor Co. and Consolidated Auto Parts/Gasset Motors), two territorial government agencies (Virgin Island Housing Authority and Department of Education/LAGA Building), a dry cleaner (O'Henry Cleaners), and a silk screening operation (Jim Tillet, Inc./Tillet Gardens) were identified as PRPs. Potential sources at these locations include petroleum and waste oil USTs, drum storage areas, contaminated catch basins, oil separators, floor drains, a sump holding tank, a leaching pit, above ground tanks, and an evaporation pit. Potential wastes which may have been disposed of include solvent based auto flushes, treatments, degreasers, cleaners, and lubricants; freon; antifreeze; kerosene; hydraulic fluid; waste oils; spent PCE waste and filters; dry cleaning fluids such as 2-butoxyethanol, hexylene glycol, and dye stripper; ammonium hydroxide; and mineral spirits. In September 1987, CERCLA funds were approved for the removal response action at the site. In September 1988, soil samples from O'Henry Cleaners, Ramsay Motor Co., Gasset Motors, Tillet Gardens, and Tutu Texaco were collected and analyzed. Volatile organics such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) were detected in soils on the properties of Ramsay, Gasset, Tillet, and Tutu Texaco. Soil samples were collected from a tank excavation at Tutu Texaco. Volatile organics including PCE were detected in the soils at O'Henry Cleaners. In August 1987 and June 1989, waste oil samples were collected from several storage and collection vessels including USTs at Ramsay Motor Co., Tutu Texaco, and Tutu Esso. Analysis of these samples detected BTEX; and other volatiles such as PCE and 1,1,1- trichloroethane. Additional soil samples were collected from soil piles and pit excavations at Tutu Texaco TUT OO1 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 and Tutu Esso; and surface soils from the properties of O'Henry Cleaners, LAG A Building, and Ramsay Motor Co.. Volatiles such as 1,1,1 -trichloroethane, 1,2-trans dichloroethylene, BTEX, TCE, and PCE were detected. Semivolatiles such as phenols, polyaromatic hydrocarbons and other semivolatiles were also detected at a few of these properties. After the initial monitoring well sampling in 1987, quarterly monitoring continued on 24 of the 100 wells. In addition to TAT Photovac gas chromatograph analysis between September 1987 and September 1990, confirmation analysis was perform by the U.S. EPA Region 2, Environmental Services Division (ESDI Laboratory and PRP solicited laboratories in the Contract Laboratory Program. Analyses of samples from these wells consistently detected 1,2-trans dichloroethy lene, BTEX, TCE, and PCE. Tert-butylmethylether was detected in many wells during a the first Target Compound List sampling event conducted in October of 1987. These compounds were detected above and below their Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs). In addition, selenium was detected above the MCL. In September 1990, CLP analysis of 24 wells detected observed releases cadmium, TCE, PCE, and 1,2 dichloroethylene in nine wells. Cadmium and TCE were detected above their MCLs. The wells sampled are drilled into bedrock as it is the most productive aquifer in the area. The bedrock aquifer is the aquifer of concern. The groundwater contamination has migrated to the bedrock aquifer. Alluvial material overlies and is hydraulically connected to the bedrock. The ambient groundwater flow in this area is generally to the south. However, flow may be slightly different in response to pumping. On January 6, 1988, an US EPA Action Memorandum to authorize funds for preliminary assessment and removal actions at the site was issued. In September 1988, USEPA an Action Memorandum (dated August 22, 1988) to continue authorization of removal activities at the site was issued. In June 1989, O'Henry Cleaners, Tutu Esso, and Tutu Texaco were issued an Administrative Order on Consent by the EPA for the investigation of the area. All parties claimed to be not guilty, however agreed to investigate the extent of plume contamination. In March 1990, the EPA issued another Administrative Order on Consent stating that O'Henry Cleaners, Tutu Esso, and Tutu Texaco should pay for water connections for three residences. On March 22, 1990, an Administrative Order was issued to ESSO Standard Oil S.A., Limited Texaco Caribbean, Inc., and L'Henri, Inc., alias O'Henry Cleaners by the US EPA. The Order stated that these PRPs shall take actions (described in the Order)" to abate the release or threat of release". The site is defined as an area of groundwater contamination with known and unknown sources located within 1 mile of each other. The waste source quantity is also unknown. The contaminants detected in groundwater match those detected in soils and waste oils at the suspected and known PRP properties listed above, however definitive documentation of attribution to those sources is lacking. Tutu Esso and Tutu Texaco are gasoline stations and thereby might present constituents excluded from CERCLA remediation. However, while constituents detected in the groundwater can be attributed to some of the nine PRPs, we can consider contaminant contribution of the two gas stations because of oil waste disposal practices that have taken place there. I LIT OO1 SECTION II: MRS SCORESHEETS TUT 001 0006 SITE NAME: TUTU WELLFIED SITE SCORE: 50.00 REVISED HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM SCORING SPREADSHEET VERSION 2.1 Developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by NUS Corporation SITE NAME: TUTU WELLFIED EPA ID #: VID982272569 LOCATION: ST. THOMAS, USVI REGION: 2 DATE: AUGUST 28, 1991 RHRS SCORER: R.FEINBERG PATHWAY SCORES GROUND WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY 100.00 SURFACE WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY 0.00 Overland Flow/Flood GW to SW Drinking Water Threat 0.00 0.00 Human Food Chain Threat 0.00 0.00 Environmental Threat 0.00 0.00 Overland Flow/Flood Component 0.00 Ground Water to Surface Water Cotnp. 0.00 SOIL EXPOSURE PATHWAY 0.00 Resident Population Threat O.OOE+00 Nearby Population Threat O.OOE+00 AIR MIGRATION PATHWAY 0.00 OVERALL MIGRATION SCORE 50.00 001 SITE NAME: SOURCE 1 NAME: TUTU WELLFIED AREA OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER SITE SCORE: 50.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITY Constituents (Ib) 101 HWQ (Ib) 0 Volume (cu yd) 0 Area (sq ft) 0 Contain Area(sq ft) 0 Final HWQ for the Source HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE SOURCE VALUE SOURCE TYPE (choose one) 101 0 Landfill 0 Surface Impoundment 0 Surface Impoundment(buried) 0 Drums 0 Tanks & Non-drum Containers 101 Contaminated Soil Pile Land Treatment 1 Other * CODE CONTAMINANT L12 Dichloroethylene, trans-1, L124 Trichloroethylene LI16 Tetrachloroethene LSI Cadmium 0 0 CONTAINMENT VALUES 2Ground Water Containment 10 (Table 3-2) Surface Water (overland) 0 (Table 4-2) Flood Plain (years) (1, 10, 100, 500, NA) NA Flood Frequency Value 0 (Table 4-9) Attractiveness/Access. 0 (Table 5-6) Air Containment (gas) 0 (Table 6-3) Air Containment (part.) 0 (Table 6-9) Air Source Type (gas) 0 (Table 6-4) Air Source Type (part.) 0 (Table 6-4) Type an "L" in front of the Code / if the substance is present or was deposited as a liquid (i.e., L##). TUT 00 i 00 OS SITE NAME: TUTU WELLFIED SITE SCORE: 50.00 GROUND WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY SCORESHEET MAXIMUM VALUE Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N LIKELIHOOD OF RELEASE to an AQUIFER IB the Aquifer of Concern (AOC) KARST? Are all layers to the AOC KARST? Is there an Obs. Release to the AOC? Is there an Obs. Release to ground water? If Yes: CODE CONTAMINANT 124 Trichloroethylene 116 Tetrachloroethene 51 Cadmium 12 Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2- 0 0 1. Observed Release 550 2. Potential to Release 2a. Containment 10 Net Precipitation (inches) Calc.Val: 2b. Net Precipitation Value 10 0 Depth to Aquifer (feet) 2c. Depth to Aquifer Value 5 2d. Travel Time 35 Lowest Hydraulic Conductivity Thickness of Layer 2e. Potential to Release 500 3. Likelihood of Release 550 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS 4. Toxicity/Mobility * 5. Hazardous Waste Quantity * 6. Waste Characteristics 100 ASSIGNED VALUE N N Y Y 550 10 0 0 0 0 0 O.OOE+00 0 0 550 10000 100 32 TARGETS Distance to Nearest Well (miles) 7. Nearest Well Value 8. Population Level I Population 8a. Level I Concentrations Value Level II Population 8b. Level II Concentrations Value Potential Contamination 50 0 50 243 2430 12 12 Distance 0 - 1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 Population 0 0 1528 0 0 0 Value 0 0 523 0 0 0 9. 8c. Total Potential Contamination Value 3d. Total Population Value Resources ** ** 5 52 2494 0 TUT OOi OO09 SITE NAME: TUTU WELLFIED SITE SCORE: 50.00 10. Wellhead Protection Area 20 0 11. Total Targets ** 2544 GROUND WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY SCORE FOR THE AQUIFER Ground Water Pathway Score: Uncapped ** 542.72 12. Ground Water Pathway Score 100 100.00 TUT' O01 00.10 SECTION III: DOCUMENTATION RECORD TUT 00.1 O 0.1.1 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 MRS DOCUMENTATION RECORD-REVIEW COVER SHEET Name of Site: Tutu Wellfield Contact Persons Site Investigation: Not Applicable (Name) (Telephone) Documentation Record: Richard L. Feinberg (908) 225-6160 (Name) (Telephone) Pathways. Components, or Threats Not Evaluated The surface water, soil, and air pathways were not evaluated in this documentation record due to fact that this site is an area of groundwater contamination with known and unknown sources. (Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 1-5; 46, pp. 1, 4, 7; 50, pg. 7). In addition, the nearby surface water body (an intermittent stream which leads to Turpentine Run) is not known to be used for drinking water and there are minimal environmental threats. Turpentine Run is also intermittent stream that discharges approximately 2.1 miles downstream into the Caribbean Sea when flowing. Environmental targets such as mangrove lagoons and tropical reefs exist at or near the mouth of Turpentine Run, and desalination plants providing potable water exist further downstream (Ref. Nos. 36, pp. 13, 15, 20; 44; 45, appendix A pp. A-3, A-4, and A-5). Soil exposure may pose a threat to employees working at and residents living near suspected sources. However, until these sources are confirmed as contributing to the ground water contamination, soil exposure targets cannot be counted in the in HRS score (Ref. Nos. 8, pp. 2, 3, 4, 5; 9, pp. 1 -6; 10, pp. 1 -7; 11, pp. 1 -7). TUT OO1 0012 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 HRS DOCUMENTATION RECORD Name of Site: Tutu Wellfield EPA Region: 2 Date Prepared: 4/30/91 Street Address of Site: Tutu Area/Anna's Retreat County and State: St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands General Location in the State: Central eastern part of the island. Topographic Map: Eastern St. Thomas, V.I. Latitude: 18° 20' 30" N Longitude: 64C 53' 06" W Air Pathway - Not evaluated Ground Water Pathway - 100.00 Soil Exposure Pathway - Not evaluated Surface Water Pathway - Not evaluated HRS SITE SCORE - 50.00 TUT O01 OO1 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 WORKSHEET FOR COMPUTING HRS SITE SCORE 1. Ground Water Migration Pathway Score (S^) 100.00 10.000 (from Table 3-1, line 13) 2a. Surface Water Overland/Rood Migration Component 0.00 (from Table 4-1, line 30) 2b. Ground Water to Surface Water Migration Component 0.00 (from Table 4-25, line 28) 2c. Surface Water Migration Pathway Score (S.J 0.00 0.00 Enter the larger of lines 2a and 2b as the pathway score. 3. Soil Exposure Pathway Score (S.) 0.00 0.00 (from Table 5-1, line 22) 4. Air Migration Pathway Score (S.) O.QQ 0.00 (from Table 6-1, line 12) 5. Total of S 2 + $„* + S.2 + S.2 10.000 6. HRS Site Score Divide the value on line 5 by 4 and take the square root 50.00 TUT OO1 GO14 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 REFERENCES Reference Number Description of the Reference 1. Hazard Ranking System; Rnal Rule, 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 300. Federal Register, Volume 55, No. 241, pp 51532- 51667, December 14, 1990. 2. Superfund Chemical Database Matrix Data. May 1991. 3. Letter from Scott B. Graber, Work Assignment Manager, CDM Federal Programs Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. September 19, 1988.15 pages] 4. Preliminary Assessment Report for Tutu Texaco, St. Thomas, U. S. Virgin Islands, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT, March 24, 1989, revised May 26, 1989, TDD No. 02- 8902-40.[30 pages] 5. Leaking Underground Storage Tank Survey, St. Thomas, St. John, and St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Donald I. Hamlin Consulting Engineers, Inc. February 1986. [12 pages] 6. Field Notes, Tutu Wellfield, CDM Federal Programs Corporation, April 8 and 9, 1988.17 pages] 7. Reld Notes, Tutu Wellfield, CDM Federal Programs Corporation, September 6-15, 1988.[62 pages] 8. Letter from Scott B. Graber, TES V Regional Manager, CDM Federal Programs Corporation, to Cathy Moyik, Regional Project Officer. May 30, 1990. and Letter from Scott B. Graber, Work Assignment Manager, CDM Federal Programs Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. May 2, 1990. Data validation and analysis sheets also included for the letter report. (443 pages] 9. Letter from Scott B. Graber, TES III Regional Manager, CDM Federal Programs Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. March 31, 1989.18 pages] 10. Letter from Scott B. Graber, TES III Regional Manager, CDM Federal Programs Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. March 31, 1989.[7 pages] 11. Letter from Scott B. Graber, TES V Regional Manager, CDM Federal Programs Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. February 2, 1990. Data validation and analysis sheets also included for the letter report. [90 pages] 12. Letter from Sally Odland for Scott B. Graber, Work Assignment Manager, CDM Federal Programs Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. May 2, 1990.[3 pages) TUT 001 OOl' 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 13. Letter from Scott B. Graber, TES III Regional Manager, COM Federal Programs Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. June 27, 1989.13 pages] 14. Final Report on Results of Soil Gas Survey, Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. Geoscience Consultants, Ltd., December 18, 1987.[41 pages] 15. Summary of Laboratory Results for Oil and Water Samples Collected from Tanks, Storm Drains, and Sumps at Gasoline Stations and Auto Body Shops in Tutu, St, Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands on August 17, 1987, U.S. EPA Region 2 Technical Assistance Team, Weston/SPER Division, February 23, 1988.152 pages] 16. Letter from Scott B. Graber, COM Federal Programs Corp., to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. October 31, 1988.[4 pages] 17. Letter from Scon B. Graber, COM Federal Programs Corp., to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. March 6, 1989. Data validation and analysis sheets also included for the data summary.[53 pages] 18. Preliminary Assessment Report for Tutu Esso, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT, March 24, 1989, TDD No. 02-8902-43.116 pages] 19. Field Notes, Tutu Wellfield, Esso Tank Excavation, CDM Federal Programs Corporation, June 5-10, 1989.[45 pages] 20. Letter from Scott B. Graber, CDM Federal Programs Corp., to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. April 24, 1989.12 pages] 21. Letter from Ana Gloria Ramos, P.E., Environmental Coordinator, Esso Standard Oil S. A. Limited, to Francine Lang, Director, Department of Planning and Natural Resources. February 22, 1988.[22 pages] 22. Esso Tutu Service Station Soil Gas Vapor Screening Survey Report, St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Belgodere and Associates. June 14, 1988.162 pages] 23. Laboratory Analysis of Soil at Tutu Esso Car Care Center, Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. Soil Tech Corp. January 11, 1989.174 pages] 24. Preliminary Assessment Report for Gasset Motors, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT, March 24, 1989, TDD No. 02-8902-41.124 pages] 25. Preliminary Assessment Report for Ramsey Motors, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT, March 24, 1989, TDD No. 02-8902-42, Rev. No. 1.123 pages] 26. Preliminary Assessment Report for LAGA Building/Virgin Islands Department of Education, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT, March 24, 1989, TDD No. 02-8902-44.[20 pages] TUT OOi OO16 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 27. Preliminary Site Assessment Report for L'Henry, Inc., St. Thomas, U.S.V.I., Pedro Panzardi and Associates, October 1989.[38 pages] 28. Reld Notebook No. 0398, Virgin Islands Drum Reconnaissance, TDD No. 02-8901-29, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT, Edison, New Jersey, February 2-15, 1989.[10 pages] 29. Memorandum from Ivan Garcia, Roy F. Weston, Inc. TAT to Carlos O'Neill, U.S. EPA Caribbean Field Office, Subject: Photovac results 1987-1990, Tutu Wells, St. Thomas. April 17,1990.118 pages] 30. Memorandum from Ivan Garcia and Arnarldo Martinez, Roy F. Weston, Inc. TAT to Luis Santos (OSC), U.S. EPA Caribbean Reld Office, Subject: Results of February 1990 quarterly sampling of Tutu Wells, St. Thomas, USVI. April 12,1990.[6 pages] 31. U.S. EPA Region 2 Environmental Services Division Laboratory, Turpentine Run, Laboratory Analysis from a Roy F. Weston TAT, Region 2, sampling event conducted on October 6-7, 1987. Project No. 262, Organic Analysis, Project No. 263, Inorganic Analysis. December 22, 1987. [93 pages] 32. Memorandum from Joseph Soroka, Chief, Organic Chemistry Section, to Kevin Kubik, Chief, Superfund Support Section, (Both of U.S. EPA, Region 2, Environmental Services Division). Subject: Detection Limits For Turpentine Run. April 4, 1991.[5 pages] 33. 1st Sampling Report September 1990, Tutu Wells Site Quarterly Sampling, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. Geraghty and Miller, Inc., January 1991.[239 pages] 34. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40 - Protection of Environment, Parts 199 to 299, Section 261.24, pg. 406. Revised July 1, 1988.11 page] 35. Donnelly, T.W. Geology of St. Thomas and St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, In Caribbean Geological Investigations, Geological Society of America, Memoir 98 ed. H.H. Hess. 1966, (pp. 88, 89, 94-97, 115, 120-122, plate No. 1). 36. " Jordan, D.G. and O.J. Cosner,. A Survey of the Water Resources of St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report, 1973, (pp.4-6, 13, 15, 20, 34, 37-39, 42-45). 37. Letter from Judy Steiger, Hydrologist, U.S. Geological Survey, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. August 10, 1990.114 pages] 38. Memorandum from Judy Steiger, U.S. Geological Survey to Richard Feinberg, NUS Corp. Subject: Tutu Well Inventory. March 27, 1991.122 pages] 39. Well Logs from selected wells in the Tutu Section of Anna's Retreat, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. 1977 - 1981.118 pages] OO1 CO1 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 40. Potentiometric Surface of the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer in the Tutu Area, Eastern St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, September 11, 1987. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 88-4131 .[1 sheet] 41. Well Appropriation Permits issued in St. Thomas/St. John as of July 31, 1987. Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources.[12 pages] 42. Project Note: From Richard L. Feinberg to File, TDD. No. 02-9102-11, Cross Reference of Well Inventories Provided in the Documentation Record. April 26, 1991.11 page] 43. Federal Reporting Data System, Public Water System - Comprehensive Report for Community and Non-Community Supplies, U.S EPA Region 2, Virgin Islands, Fiscal Year 1988. March 3, 1989, (pp. 5, 6, 47, 86, 93, 94, 106, 281, 295, 300, 310, 311). 44. U. S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Topographic Map, 7.5 minute series, "Eastern St. Thomas, USVI", 1954, Revised 1982. 45. Final Report, Water Management Plan For The Public Water System - U.S. Virgin Islands. CH2M Hill Southeast, Inc. July 1983.122 pages] 46. Tutu Well Site Potable Water Alternatives Report, Anna's Retreat, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. Region 2 Technical Assistance Team (TAT), Weston/SPER Division. December 1988.183 pages] 47. U.S. EPA, Pollution Report (POLREP), Nos. 10 (January 11, 1988); 11 (June 30, 1988); 14 (May 1, 1989); 15 (January 10, 1990). Tutu Well Site, January 10, 1990.118 pages] 48. Letter from Scott B. Graber, CDM Federal Programs Corp., to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. April 20, 1990.[7 pages] 49. Department of Planning and Natural Resources, Order, In The Matter of Texaco Caribbean, Inc. St. Thomas. July 27, 1987. and Rrst Amended Order, In The Matter of Texaco Caribbean, Inc. St. Thomas. August 5, 1987.18 pages] 50. U.S. EPA Draft Action Memorandum from Luis Santos, U.S. EPA On Scene Coordinator (OSC) to William J. Muszynski, P.E., Acting Regional Administrator, thru Stephen D. Luftig, Director of Emergency and Remedial Response Division. February 1989.112 pages] 51. US EPA Region 2 Administrative Order, In The Matter Of The ESSO Standard Oil S.A., Limited Texaco Caribbean, Inc., L'Henri, Inc., d/b/a O'Henry Cleaners, Tutu Well Site, Anna's Retreat, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Island. Prepared for the U.S. EPA by CDM Federal Programs Corp. October 14, 1989.[25 pages] 52. Telecon Note: Conversation between Sally Odland, Camp Dresser and Mckee, and Richard L. Feinberg, NUS Corp., May 23, 1991.[1 page] TUT O01 0018 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 53. Facsimile from Ben Nazario, Virgin Island Department of Natural Resources, and Richard L. Feinberg, NUS Corp., April 30, 1991.[3 pages] 54. Telecon Note: Conversation between Ben Nazario/Ms. Monsanto, Virgin Islands Department of Natural Resources, and Richard L. Feinberg, NUS Corp., May 1, 1991.14 pages] 55. Project Note From Richard L. Feinberg, NUS Corp., to Rle, Subject: Calculation of Ground Water Population Apportionment, May 30, 1991.11 page] 56. U.S. EPA Action Memorandum from Carlos O'Neill, U.S. EPA On Scene Coordinator (OSC) to Stephen D. Luftig, Director of Emergency and Remedial Response Division, thru George Zachos, Acting Chief, Response and Prevention Branch January 6, 1988.112 pages] 57. U.S. EPA Action Memorandum from Carlos O'Neill, U.S. EPA On Scene Coordinator (OSC) to William Muszynski, Acting Regional Administrator, thru Stephen D. Luftig, Director of Emergency and Remedial Response Division. August 22, 1988. Signed September 14, 1988.15 pages] 58. Standard Calculation Sheet From Richard L. Feinberg, NUS Corp., to File, Subject: Calculation of Area of Observed Contamination, August 24, 1991.[3 pages] 59. U.S. EPA Region 2 Environmental Services Division Laboratory, Tutu Well Site V.I., Laboratory Analysis from a Roy F. Weston TAT, Region 2, sampling event conducted on July 22, 1987. Project No. 162, July 30, 1987. [4 pages] 60. Sampling, Analysis, and Monitoring Plan for Wells, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Island. Prepared for Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee by Geraghty and Miller, Inc., International Group. September 1990.[56 pages] 61. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40 - Protection of Environment, Parts 100 to 149, Pt. 136, App. A Meth. 624 pp. 427-437. Revised July 1, 1986.110 pages] 62. Method 524.2. Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. J. W. Eichelberger, W.L. Budde, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US EPA. Revision 3.O., pages 285-323, 1989.138 pages] 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 SD-Characterization and Containment SOURCE DESCRIPTION 2.2 Source Characterization Number of the source: Known sources and unknown sources Name and description of the source: Groundwater contamination with known and unknown sources In July 1987, it was reported that several wells used for public drinking supply in the Tutu area exhibited a strong unpleasant odor. Sampling and analysis of 24 wells in July and October of 1987 detected high concentrations of chlorinated organic compounds (trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, 1,2-trans dichloroethylene, benzene, toluene, and xylenes). Subsequently, 13 commercial and 5 private wells were ordered closed and alternative plans including trucking water to the area began (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 1, 4, B-1, B-9, B-12; 48, pg. 2; 50, pp. 1, 2, 3). At least nine Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) were identified as to contributing to this groundwater contamination. These PRPs included three gasoline stations (Tutu Texaco Service Station, Tutu Esso Care Center, and Rodriguez Auto Parts); two vehicle maintenance repair stations (Ramsay Motors and Consolidated Auto Parts [Gasset Motors] ); two territorial government agencies (Virgin Island Housing Authority [VIHA] and Department of Education/Laga Building [formerly a clothing manufacturing plant]); one dry cleaner (O'Henry Cleaners); and a silk screening business (Tillet Inc.). One of the three gas stations was abandoned (Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 1-5; 46, pp. 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 27, 32, 33-41, B-1, B-9; 22, pg. 5; 51, pp. 1-10; 52). The following is a list of potential sources on the properties of the suspected PRPs: • Tutu Texaco Service Station This facility has contributed to groundwater contamination via unleaded and leaded gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs), an oil separator, catch basins, a drum storage area, a collection pit/trap, floor drains, and waste oil spills. Three 4,000 gallon gasoline USTs were taken out of service in 1980 due suspected leaks and mechanical integrity test failure. These three tanks were excavated in September 1988. Large and small holes were discovered in the tanks during the investigation. Strong odors of petroleum hydrocarbons and air readings above background were detected on the HNu Photoionizer during the excavation. In 1987, soil on the property was observed being saturated with waste oil or petroleum products. During a 1989 NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT Preliminary Assessment site reconnaissance, it was observed that the drum storage area did not exhibit any containment. In addition, stains were evident on the grounds of the facility (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 4; 4, pp. 1, 2, 3, 4, 27, 28, 29; 5, pp. 9, 11, 12; 6. pp. 2, 3; 7, pp. 56, 57; 16, pp. 1, 2; 28, pp. 13A, 14, 14A, 15). TUT 001 0020 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 cation indicated that besides gasoline and waste oil, the following t the facility: freon, antifreeze, and a large variety of solvent based s, degreasers, cleaners, and lubricants. The hazardous materials were indicated to be xylenes, naphtha, ethoxylated nonyl phenol, e, 1,1,1 -trichloroethane, tetrachloroethylene (PCE), and ethylene -5; 6, pg. 3). oil samples collected from sumps, an oil water separator, a waste n were submitted for Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) analysis. >ds were detected: acetone (2,200 ug/kg), 2-butanone (6,300 jg/kg). toluene (43,000 ug/kg), ethylbenzene (14,000 ug/kg), total , chloroform (260 ug/kg), and 1,1,1 -trichloroethane (2,400 ug/kg) i September 1988, soil samples collected from a tank excavation ; were submitted for CLP analysts and the following compounds xoethane (10 micrograms/kilogram [ug/kg]), 4-methyl 2-pentanone 1,000 ug/kg), xylene (58,000 ug/kg), benzene (4,600 ug/kg), and ig/kg). In some samples, estimated values of these and other re significantly higher than those represented above (Ref. No. 10. soil samples were collected from a pile and submitted for CLP compounds along with their maximum concentrations detected: ) ug/kg) and PCE (160 ug/kg). Other volatiles were detected at low ; (Ref No. 8, pp. 1-5, 25). In July 1989, oil samples were collected tor, collection pit, and five drums, and were submitted for CLP How" - compounds were detected at estimated concentrations: xylt^, (1,600,000 ug/kg), benzene (46,000 ug/kg), ethylbenzene ', 1-trichloroethane (3,900 ug/kg) (Ref. Nos. 9, pp. 1-5, 52, 53; jas survey of the central Tutu area detected high concentrations ns and a very low concentration of PCE in the unsaturated zone Texaco (Ref. No. 14, pp. 1, 13, 15, 17, 22, 23, 28). listorica! information indicate that Tutu Texaco has contributed amination in the area. Waste units and former product storage :e of poor containment. Products used at the facility contain some s found in groundwater. Soil and waste oil analyses from the iany of the same CERCLA and non-CERCLA eligible contaminants >r. 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 i via leaded and unleaded s. In 1987, a petrotite leak was questionable. In June troleum, oily sheens in the hotoionizer were detected IT Preliminary Assessment placed into the UST. No ste units (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 13, 16-26.31,34-36,39, nd waste oil, the following riety of solvent based auto hazardous materials found c acid, and other solvents • separator were submitted compounds were detected: jne (200,000 ug/kg), total jg/kg), and PCE (110,000 sample was collected from allowing compounds were |/kg), 1,1,1 -trichloroethane No. 17, pp. 1-4). In June !es and were submitted for jizene (60 ug/kg), toluene 10 ug/kg), chlorobenzene (8 000 ug/kg), fluorene (300 mated values of these and i represented above. In July or and an UST, and were were detected at estimated j), benzene (12,000 ug/kg), , 1 -trichloroethane (42,000 '., 13). In April 1988, a soil zene, toluene, and xylenes urinated hydrocarbons such stected (Ref. No. 22, pp. 5, TUT O01 GO 2.1. 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 The analytical data and historical information indicate that Tutu Esso has contributed to the groundwater contamination. Waste units and former product storage units have shown evidence of poor containment. Products used at the facility contain some of the same constituents found in the groundwater. Soils and waste oil analyses from the property have detected many of the same CERCLA and non-CERCLA eligible contaminants also found in the groundwater. • Rodriguez Auto Parts (Esso) The facility is suspected of contributing to the groundwater contamination via leaded and unleaded gasoline USTs, drum storage, an underground oil collection pit, floor drains, and a cement cistern used car wash water collection. The containment of these waste units is unknown (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 4; 5, pp. 9, 11). A CERCLA 104(e) notification indicated that besides gasoline and waste oil, the following products were present at the facility: Shell Sol (low aromatic white spirit/ Stoddard Solvent), miscellaneous solvents, kerosene, and grease. Another hazardous compound known to present on site is xylenes (Ref. No. 3, pg. 4). There is a potential that this facility is contributing to the groundwater contamination. The products used on site contain hazardous constituents found in the groundwater. There are no analytical data and the containment of the waste units on site are unknown. • Ramsay Motor Company The facility is suspected of contributing to the groundwater contamination via a UST and 55-gallon drums. During a 1989 NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT Preliminary Assessment site reconnaissance, it was observed that the drums were not properly contained and small quantities of oil appeared to be leaking. Oil stains and pools were evident on the grounds during the reconnaissance. In addition personnel from NUS Corp. observed an oily material that had migrated from a nearby property. In June 1989, personnel from Camp Oresser and Mckee observed that oily material was still migrating onto the property. The containment or integrity of the UST is unknown (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 2; 7, pg. 7; 12; 13; 20; 25, pp. 1, 2, 3; 28, pp. 15A, 16). A CERCLA 104(e) notification indicated that besides waste oil, the following products were present at the facility: antifreeze, and a large variety solvent based auto flushes, treatments, degreasers, cleaners, and lubricants. The hazardous materials found in these products were indicated to be xylenes, naphtha, ethoxylated nonyl phenol, propane, butyl cellosolve, 1,1,1 -trichloroethane, PCE, petroleum distillates, and ethylene glycol (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 3; 6, pg. 6). 11 "UT 00.1. 0022 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 (n August 1987, waste oil samples collected from a waste oil storage tank were submitted for Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) analysis. The following compounds were detected: 2-butanone (150,000 ug/kg), benzene (210,000 ug/kg), toluene (1,400,000 ug/kg), ethylbenzene (290,000 ug/kg) and total xvlenes (1,700,000 ug/kg) (Ref. No. 15, pp. 2-4). In September 1988, two surface soil samples were collected and submitted for CLP analysis and the following compounds were detected: 4-methyl 2-pentanone (8 ug/kg), toluene (2 ug/kg), xylene (7 ug/kg), benzene (6 ug/kg), 2-hexanone (55 ug/kg), and ethylbenzene (18 ug/kg) (Ref. No. 9. pp. 1, 4). In June 1989, a surface soil sample was collected submitted for CLP analysis. The following compounds were detected: naphthalene (4,400 ug/kg), 2-methylnaphthalene (6,100 ug/kg), pyrene (2,000 ug/kg), and bis(2- ethylhexyDphthalate (5,400 ug/kg). Other compounds were detected at estimated values. In July 1989, oil samples were collected from a UST and were submitted for CLP analysis. Some of the following compounds were detected at estimated concentrations: 2-hexanone (180,000 ug/kg), toluene (450,000 ug/kg), xylene (1,200,000 ug/kg), benzene (64,000 ug/kg), and ethylbenzene (130,000 ug/kg) (Ref. Nos. 8, pp. 1-5, 43-50; 11, pp. 1, 3; 12, 13). The analytical data and historical information indicate that Ramsay Motor Company may have contributed to the groundwater contamination. Waste units have shown evidence of poor containment. Products used at the facility contain some of the same constituents found in the groundwater. Waste oil and soil analyses have detected some of the same CERCLA and non-CERCLA eligible contaminants also found in the groundwater. • Gasset Motors/Consolidated Auto Parts The facility is suspected of contributing to the groundwater contamination via 55-gallon drums (waste oil and raw material); and messy house-keeping of service yard and bays. During a 1989 NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT Preliminary Assessment site reconnaissance, it was observed that waste oil from a drainage ditch was discharging onto a nearby property (Ramsay Motors) and stained soil was evident in other parts of the facility. During the same reconnaissance it was observed that the drums were not properly contained. The containment of the UST is unknown (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 3; 6, pg. 6; 7, pg. 58; 12; 24, pp. 1,2,3; 28, pp. 15). A CERCLA 104(e) notification indicated that besides waste oil, the following products were present at the facility: engine fluids and miscellaneous chemicals (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 3; 6, pg. 6). 12 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 In August 1987, waste oil samples collected from a gutter and a storm drain were submitted for Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) analysis. The following compounds were detected: acetone (2,100), 2-butanone (4,200 ug/kg), toluene (780 ug/kg), ethylbenzene (390 ug/kg), and total xylenes (2,600 ug/kg) (Ref. No. 15, pp. 2-4). In September 1988, two surface soil samples and a surface water sample were submitted for CLP analysis and the following compounds were detected: toluene (1,300 ug/kg), xylene (5.600 ug/kg), ethylbenzene (2,100 ug/kg), and styrene (6 ug/kg). Benzene was also detected at estimated concentrations (Ref. No. 9, pp. 1, 4, 5). In July 1989, an oil sample was collected from a drainage ditch and submitted for CLP analysis. Acetone was detected at a low estimated value, however this sample was mistakenly analyzed as a water (Ref. Nos. 11, pp. 5, 6; 12; 13). The analytical data and historical information indicate that Gasset Motors/Consolidated Auto Parts may have contributed to the groundwater contamination. Waste units and former product storage units have shown evidence of poor containment. Products used at the facility contain some of the same constituents found in the groundwater. Waste oil and soil analyses have detected some of the same CERCLA and non-CERCLA eligible contaminants also found in the groundwater. Virgin Island Housing Authority (VIHA) Formerly Tropical Motors (automobile dealership), the facility is suspected of contributing to the groundwater contamination via a UST. A CERCLA 104(e) notification indicated that hydraulic fluid was reportedly stored in the UST. No further information is known about the containment of this unit nor is there any analytical data from this property (Ref. No. 3, pg. 3). In August 1987, waste oil samples collected from a UST were submitted for Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) analysis. The following compounds were detected: benzene (97,000 ug/kg), toluene (98,000 ug/kg), ethylbenzene (500,000 ug/kg), and total xylenes (2,900,000 ug/kg) (Ref. No. 15, pp. 2-4). There is a potential for this facility to have contributed to the groundwater contamination due to past operations. However, very little is known about the past operations and more information is needed to characterize the site. Department of Education/Laga Building Formerly a clothing manufacturing plant, the facility is suspected of contributing to the groundwater contamination via abandoned 55-gallon drums. During a February 1989 NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT Preliminary Assessment site reconnaissance, it was observed that the abandoned drums were not contained and were deposited in a haphazard manner on the property. These drums were badly corroded or perforated and some were empty. Access to these drums or the property was not restricted. In June 1989, Camp Dresser and Mckee observed that drums were still on the property. In addition, past operations at the facility include the extensive use of PCE (Ref. No. 7, pp. 31, 32; 14, 1, 2, 3, 24; 26, pp. 1, 2, 3; 28, pg. 17). 13 TUT OOi 0024 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 In November 1987, a soil gas survey in the area revealed the highest concentration of PCE was found adjacent to a loading dock at the facility (Ref. No. 14, pp. 1, 21, 22, 23). In June 1989, surface soil and drum samples were collected and submitted for CLP analysis. The following compounds were detected: phenol (900,000 ug/kg), 2- methylphenol (320,000 ug/kg), naphthalene (4,100 ug/kg), and endosulfan sulfate I (92 ug/kg). The following compounds detected at estimated concentrations are noted due their high values: 4-methylphenol (1,300,000 ug/kg), 2,4-dimethylphenol (42,000 ug/kg), and naphthalene (7,700 ug/kg) (Ref. No. 8, pp. 1-5, 39-43). The analytical data and historical information strongly suggests that the Department of Education/Laga Building may have contributed to the groundwater contamination. Abandoned drums have shown evidence of poor containment. Products used at the facility contain some of the same constituents found in the groundwater. Soil analysis has detected some of the same CERCLA and non-CERCLA eligible contaminants also found in the groundwater. O'Henry Cleaners The facility has contributed to the groundwater contamination via a leaching pit, a sump holding tank, a raw material (PCE) storage area, aboveground fuel tanks, drains, effluent discharges for steam condensate from the presses and the clothes dryer), and 5- gallon containers of spent PCE residue or filters. Little information about the containment of these waste units is known, however spills of PCE reportedly have occurred. The PA indicates that O'Henry uses 1.5 to 1.75 gallons of PCE per month and has disposed of the PCE residues and spent filters at a "local dump site" in the past. The PA also indicates that a small amount PCE residue and waste was possibly disposed of on site in the past (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 2; 6, pg. 5; 7, pg. 6; 13; 27, pp. 4-10). A CERCLA 104(e) notification indicated that products other than PCE used on site include dry cleaning fluids such as 2-butoxyethanol, hexylene glycol, hydrofluoric acid, degreaser, unspecified volatile solvents, and dye stripper (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 2; 33, pp. 5). In September 1988, one soil sample was collected and submitted for CLP analysis and tetrachloroethane was detected at 440,000 ug/kg (Ref. No. 9, pg. 3; 13). In June 1989, three surface soil samples were collected and submitted for CLP analysis. The following compounds were detected: TCE (75 ug/kg) and PCE (180,000 ug/kg). Other compounds were detected at low estimated levels including 1,2 dichloroethylene (total) (Ref. No. 8, pp. 1-5, 31-36). The analytical data and historical information indicate that O'Henry's Cleaners has contributed to the groundwater plume. Reportedly spillage and improper disposal of waste might have occurred. Products used at the facility contain some of the same constituents found in the groundwater. Soil analysis has detected some of the same CERCLA and non- CERCLA eligible contaminants also found in the groundwater. 14 TUT 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 Jim Tillet Inc. The facility is suspected of contributing to the groundwater contamination via paint containers, a raw material storage area, floor drains, and evaporation pit. Dry residue was disposed at a local dump. In September 1988, during a Camp Dresser and Mckee visit to the property, spilled dry paint was observed on the ground (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 3; 6, pg. 4; 7, pp. 18-20). A CERCLA 104{e) notification indicated that products used on site included water-based dyes (ammonium hydroxide, mineral spirits) (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 3). In November 1987, a soil gas survey in the area, detected concentrations of hydrocarbons, PCE, trichloroethane, and TCE in the Tillet Garden area (Ref. No. 14, pp. 14-21). In September 1988, one soil sample was collected and submitted for CLP analysis and xylene was detected at a low estimated concentration (Ref. No. 9, pp. 1,5). There is a potential that this facility is contributing to the groundwater contamination. The products used on site contain hazardous constituents found in the groundwater. There are no analytical data and the containment of the waste units on site are unknown. 15 TUT OO1 0026 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 From July 1987 to February 1990, photovac (portable field gas chromatograph) sampling results indicated that benzene, toluene, PCE, TCE, and dichloroethylene were consistently present in domestic wells. In addition, US EPA Region 2 Environmental Services Division Laboratory and Contract Laboratory Program analyses of many of these same wells detected the presence of PCE, TCE, 1,2- trans dichloroethylene, and cadmium (Ref. Nos. 29, pp. 1-18; 31, pp. 1-89; 33, pp. N-1 -N-19). Location of the source, with reference to a map of the site: An area of contaminated ground water with known and unknown sources located on the eastern end of St Thomas, USVI in the Tutu section of Anna's Retreat (Figure No. 1; Ref. No. 44). Containment Gas release to air Not evaluated. Paniculate release to air Not evaluated. Release to ground water An area of groundwater contamination in the Tutu Section of Anna's Retreat has been documented. Several suspected sources have been identified, including a dry cleaners, gas stations, and auto repair shops (Ref. No. 46, pp. 1, 4, 7). Several mechanisms for contaminant transport from these sources have been presupposed or documented including: leaking USTs; contaminated oil separators, catch basins, floor drains, ditches; uncontained drum storage areas; raw material storage areas; leaching and evaporation pits; aboveground fuel tanks; paint containers; and improper handling of wastes (Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 1-5; 6, pp. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). Release via overland migration and/or flood Not evaluated. 16 TUT 001 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 SO-Hazardous Substances Source No.: 1 2.4.1 Hazardous Substances Hazardous substance Evidence Reference Cadmium U. S. EPA Environmental Services Ref. Nos. 29, 1,2 Trans Dichloroethylene Division analytical results, U. S. EPA pp. 1-18:31, Trichloroethylene Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Photo vac pp. 1-89; 33, Tetrachloroethylene results. Potentially Responsible Party pp. N-1 - N-19 analytical results 17 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 Source No.: 1 2.4.2. Hazardous Waste Quantity The waste quantity for this groundwater plume cannot be ascertained. However, an observed release including Level I and II concentrations has been exhibited, therefore the default value for hazardous waste quantity (100) would be used as stated in section 2.4.2.2 of the HRS final rule Federal Register Vol. 55, No. 241, December 14, 1990, (pages 51519-51592). 18 001 0029 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 SD-Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value Source No.: 1 2.4.2.1.5. Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value: 100 19 TUT 001 OO30 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 So-Summary SITE SUMMARY OF SOURCE DESCRIPTIONS Containment Source Hazardous Source Waste Quantity Ground Surface Air No. Value Water Water Gas Particulate 1 100 non-zero N/A N/A N/A 20 TUT OO1 OO31 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 GW-General 3.0 GROUND WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY 3.0.1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Aquifer/Stratum 1 (shallowest) Aquifer/Stratum Name: Turpentine Run Basin Alluvium Description: In certain areas on the island, including the Turpentine Run Valley, alluvium overlies the bedrock (Ref. Nos. 35, plate No. 1; 36, pp. 4, 6). The alluvium consists of silt, fine sand, and clay and discontinuous beds/lenses of sand and gravel 2 to 3 feet thick (Ref. No. 36, pp. 5, 6). Well logs from the area show that the average range of thickness is between 20 and 45 feet thick. However, deposits have been found to be 70 feet thick in some places (Ref. Nos. 39, pp. 9, 10). These deposits are known to have a high porosity with a low permeability, therefore creating a low yielding aquifer. The sand and gravel beds/lenses may have a higher yield than the rest of the aquifer. The hydraulic conductivity of the alluvial deposits are estimated to be between 10"* to 10"* cm/sec. This unit primarily recharges the bedrock aquifer in this area of the island (Ref. Nos. 1, pg. 51601; 36, pp. 34, 38, 39). The site which is located in the Tutu area is in the uppermost section of the Turpentine Run River Basin. The alluvium is known to be under water table conditions in the vicinity of the site. However, there are few exceptions where the sand and gravel deposits are artesian (Ref. No. 36, pg. 34). The depth to groundwater in the area of the site ranges from 2 to 15 feet (Ref. Nos. 40; 36, pg. 37). Groundwater flows south, east, and west from higher elevations into the upper basin; and then exhibits a generally southerly flow throughout the lower basin (Ref. Nos. 40; 36, pp. 38, 39, 41, 42, 43; 22, pg. 8). The principal alluvium aquifer is in the lower Turpentine Run Basin as it is recharged by intermittent stream base flow and storm water runoff from the upper portion of the basin (Ref. No. 36, p. 44). References: 1, 35, 36, 39, 40 Aquifer/Stratum 2 (deepest! Aquifer/Stratum Name: Water Island and Louisenhoj Formations Description: The Louisenhoj Formation overlies the Water Island Formation in the area of the site. Both of these formations are volcanic in nature. The Louisenhoj Formation consists of augite-andesite breccia, volcanic tuff, and conglomerate. These rocks exhibit a variety of colors including, but not limited to blue, brown, brick red, and purple. They have also been found to have greenish to grayish fragments. In addition, these rocks may contain a wide variety of minerals including plagioclase, clinopyroxene, chlorite, feldspars, pumpellyite, quartz, 21 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 magnetite, pyrite, and hematite. The Water Island Formation consists of volcanic flow breccias, tuffs, spilite flows, and keratophyre flows. Keratophyre is a reddish gray to greenish gray intrusive volcanic rock predominantly consisting of albite and quartz, with mica, chlorite, and iron oxides. Spilites are a greenish intrusive volcanic rock predominantly consisting chlorite and albite, with epidote, prehnite, calcite, and clinopyroxene (Ref. Nos. 36, pp. 4, 5, 6; 39, pp. 1- 19; 35, pp. 88, 94, 95, 96, 97, 115, 120, 121, 122, plate No. 1). These formations were tilted uniformly northward to form a homocline. The homocline is cut by sets of faults trending north 45° west, north 55" east, and north. "Three well-defined joint sets parallel each of the major fault directions".The topography of the island show similar trends creating high yielding groundwater zones in the valleys (e.g. Turpentine River Basin) (Ref. Nos. 35, plate No. 1; 36, pg. 6). Dips appear to range from 35 to 75 degrees in the vicinity of the site (Ref. No. 35, plate No. 1). The hydraulic conductivity of these formations is estimated to be 10"* to 10'* cm/sec (Ref. No. 1, pg. 51601). The bedrock aquifer is principally recharged by infiltration, storm water runoff, and stream flow discharge. The bedrock aquifer is hydraulically connected to the unconsolidated aquifer, however the bedrock aquifer has a different potentiometric surface. Groundwater in the bedrock aquifer flows ultimately in a southerly direction following the joint and fracture sets (Ref Nos. 22, pg. 5; 36, pp. 34, 38, 41, 42, 43, 44; 39; 40). References: 1, 35, 36, 39, 40 22 TUT 001 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 3.1 LIKELIHOOD OF RELEASE GW-Observed Release 3.1.1 OBSERVED RELEASE Aquifer Being Evaluated: Bedrock Aquifer Contaminants from groundwater contamination present in the downgradient domestic and commercial wells (Ref. Nos. 29, 31, 32, 33, 38, 40, 46, 47, 48). Chemical Analysis: Background Concentration Sample ID Depth* Screened Interval Date Reference VIHA No. 3 17ft 73 to 142ft "* 37, pp. 2 - 4;40 + 222 MSL* * +166 to + 97 MSL * Highest seasonal depth to groundwater for well listed above using available background data '* (MSL) - Elevation in feet measured in reference to mean sea level *** Sample collected between September 24 - October 3, 1990 23 TUT OO1 OO34 Sample ID VIHA No. 3 (Sept. 1990) Hazardous Substance Cadmium Concentration Not Detected Tetrachloro- ethylene (PCE) Trichloro- ethylene (TCE) Not Detected Not Detected 1,2 Trans Di- Not Detected chloroethylene (DCE) VIHA No. 3 (Oct. 1987) 1.2 Trans DCE PCE Not Detected Not Detected * Method Detection Limit Contract Required Quantitation Limit 5 ug/L 1 ug/L 1 ug/L 1 ug/L 1.6 ug/L* 4.1 ug/L* 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 Reference Nos. 33, Table No. 2, pp. N- 17, N-131; 60, pg. 30 of 56 Nos. 33, Table No. 1, pg. N-17; Table No. 2, pg. N-119; 60, pg. 30 of 56 Nos. 33, Table No. 1, pg. N-17; Table No. 2, pg. N-119; 60, pg. 30 of 56 Nos. 33, Table No. 1, pg. N-17; Table No. 2, pg. N-119; 60, pg. 27 of 56 No. 31, pg. 33; 32, pg. 146 No. 31,pg. 33; 32, pg. 146 24 TUT OO1 OO35 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 Contaminated Samples Sample ID Depth* Screened Interval Four Winds 8.02ft 36 to 285ft No. 2 +156.98 MSL" + 125 to -120 MSL Date Reference 37, pp. 2. 3, 5; 40; 42 Hartman Crusher 25.67 ft 40 to 125 ft + 114.33 MSL +100 to +15 MSL 37, pp. 2, 3, 5; 40; 42 Elgin 2 14.37ft 40 to 225 ft + 134.63 MSL + 109 to -79 MSL 37. pp. 2. 3, 5; 40; 42 Elgin 3 18.27ft 40 to 325ft + 133.73 MSL +112 to-173 MSL 37, pp. 2, 3, 5; 40; 42 Matthias Smith Harvey Hartman Estate Steele Tillet 10.00ft + 80.00 MSL 8.54ft + 81.46 MSL 23.57 ft + 114.43 MSL ? to 50 ft ?to +40 MSL unknown ? to 160 ft ? to -22 MSL 35ft 100 to 200ft + 161 MSL +96 to-100 MSL 62.74 ft + 87.26 MSL 22.46 ft + 163.54 MSL ? to 150ft ? to +25 MSL 10 to 100ft + 176 to +86 MSL 37, pp. 2, 3, 5; 40; 42 37, pp. 2, 3, 5; 40; 42 37, pp. 2, 3, 5; 40; 42 38, pp. 5, 8, 11; 40; 42 37, pp. 2. 3, 5; 40; 42 37. pp. 2, 3, 5 * Highest seasonal depth to groundwater for wells listed above using available back- ground data ** (MSL) - Elevation in feet measured in reference to mean sea level *** Sample collected between September 24 - October 3, 1990 25 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 Sample ID Hazardous Substance Elgin 2 Cadmium (Sept. 1990) Four Winds Cadmium No.2 Cadmium (Sept. 1990) Hartman Cadmium Crusher (No.2) (Sept. 1990) Elgin 3 (Sept. 1990) Matthias (Sept. 1990) Smith (Sept. 1990) TCE TCE TCE Steele TCE (Sept. 1990) Harvey PCE (Sept. 1990) Concentration 11 ug/L 6 ug/L* 5 ug/L1 8 ug/L 14 ug/L 11 ug/L 20 ug/L 48 ug/L 890J ug/L Hartman (No.3) 1.2 Dichloroethylene 2 ug/L Estate (OCE) (Sept. 1990) Matthias 1,2 DCE (Sept. 1990) Smith (Sept. 1990) Steele (Sept. 1990) 1,2 DCE 1.2 DCE 22 ug/L 58 ug/L 120 ug/L Contract Required Quantitation Limit Reference 5 ug/L Nos. 33, Table No. 2, pp. N-15. N-132; 60, pg. 30 of 56 5 ug/L Nos. 33, Table No. 5 ug/L 2, pp. N-12, N-131; 60, pg. 30 of 56 5 ug/L Nos. 33, Table No. 2, pp. N-15, N-131; 60, pg. 30 of 56 1 ug/L Nos. 33, Table No. 1, pp. N-11, N-120; 60, pg. 27 of 56 1 ug/L Nos. 33, Table No. 1, pp. N-13, N-135; 60, pg. 27 of 56 1 ug/L1 Nos. 33, Table No. 1, pp. N-12, N-118; 60, pg. 27 of 56 1 ug/L Nos. 33, Table No. 1, pp. N-12, N-118; 60, pg. 27 of 56 1 ug/L Nos. 33, Table No. 1, pp. N-12, N-118; 60, pg. 27 of 56 1 ug/L Nos. 33, Table No. 1, pp. N-11, N-118; 60, pg. 27 of 56 1 ug/L Nos. 33. Table No. 1, pp. N-13, N-135; 60, pg. 27 of 56 1 ug/L1 Nos. 33, Table No. 1, pp. N-12, N-118 60, pg. 27 of 56 1 ug/L Nos. 33, Table No. 1,pp. N-12, N-118; 60. pg. 27 of 56 26 UT Sample ID Harvey (Oct. 1987) Harvey (Oct. 1987) Smith (Oct. 1987) Smith (Oct. 1987) Tillet (Oct. 1987) Tillet (Oct. 1987) J- 1 - Hazardous Substance 1,2-Trans DCE PCE 1,2-Trans DCE PCE Concentration 49 uo/L 2,000 ug/L 100 ug/L 150 ug/L Method Detection Limit 1.6 ug/L 4.1 ug/L 1.6 ug/L 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 Reference Nos. 31, pg. 49; 32, pg. 146 Nos. 31, pg. 50; 32, pg. 146 Nos. 31, pg. 55; 32, pg. 146 1,2-TransDCE 600 ug/L PCE 140 ug/L 4.1 ug/L Nos. 31, pg. 55; 32, pg. 146 1.6 ug/L Nos. 31, pg. 14; 32, pg. 146 4.1 ug/L Nos. 31, pg. 15; 32. pg. 146 Value is estimated (Ref. No. 33, pg. N-119). This compound was flagged "J" because it failed the Method Detection Limit (MDL) Study. The MDL study consists of seven repeat analyses of target compounds at concentrations of 1 part per billion (ppb). The QC limits for mean accuracy (percent recovery) are 80 - 120 percent. PCE was just below the lower limit at 76 percent. This MDL study indicates that the laboratory instrumentation had difficulty recovering certain compounds (including PCE) at low concentrations (1 ppb) (Ref. No. 33. pp. 80, 81). Therefore, the PCE value of 890 ug/L may represent a lower limit. In addition, the sample was analyzed using higher detection limits. There is a preponderance of evidence that PCE has been detected in this well at high concentrations. In October 1987, US EPA Region 2 ESD Laboratory analysis detected PCE at 2,000 ug/L in the Harvey Well (Ref. Nos. 31, pg. 50; 32). Photovac gas chromatograph analyses of samples from this well in 1987 and 1988 detected PCE concentrations between 500 ppb and 7,600 ppb (Ref. No. 29, pp. 6, 10) The data assessment explains that the sample from the Smith Well was originally analyzed using Method 524.2, however concentration values were not within the calibration range of the instrumentation and the laboratory defaulted to Method 624 to meet a holding time constraint. This was considered a breach of contract because Method 624 achieves higher detection limits than Method 524.2. One of the data objectives for Sampling, Analysis, and Monitoring Plan was to achieve lower detection limits. For HRS purposes, concentrations of TCE and 1,2 dichloroethylene contaminants were still above the higher detection limits set forth in Method 624. This indicates the presence of these compounds in this well (Ref. Nos. 33, pg. N-83; 60, pp. 9, 44, 45, of; 61; 62). Duplicate Analysis 27 TUT 001 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 Level I Samples Sample ID: Matthias Reference for Benchmarks: Superfund Chemical Database Matrix Hazardous Hazardous Substance Benchmark Substance Concentration Concentration Benchmark Trichloroethylene 11 ug/L 5 ug/L MCL Sample ID: Steele Reference for Benchmarks: Superfund Chemical Database Matrix Hazardous Hazardous Substance Benchmark Substance Concentration Concentration Benchmark Trichloroethylene 48 ug/L 5 ug/L MCL Sample ID: Harvey Reference for Benchmarks: Superfund Chemical Database Matrix Hazardous Hazardous Substance Benchmark Substance Concentration Concentration Benchmark Tetrachloroethylene 2,000 ug/L 350 ug/L Reference Dose Screening Cone. Sample! D: Tillet Reference for Benchmarks: Superfund Chemical Database Matrix Attribution: This site is an area of groundwater contamination with hazardous waste substances that can be attributed to known and unknown sources as described in a Administrative Order Index No. ll-CERCLA-00401, signed March 22. 1990. The Order further discusses the 1987 sampling and analytical results which lead to the closure of 24 domestic, commercial, and institutional wells in the Tutu area 1987. Additional sampling information from 1987 to 1990 and enforcement stipulations are further discussed in the Order (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 1,32; 51, pp. 1-25). U. S. EPA Region 2 ESD laboratory analysis from this sampling consistently detected volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including, but not limited to 1,2-trans dichloroethylene (DCE), TCE, and PCE in many residential and commercial wells. These include the wells that detected observed releases according to the September 1990 CLP analysis as well as others. The following is a list of contaminant concentration ranges detected during the October 1987 sampling: 1,2-trans DCE at non-detected levels to 600 ug/L (Tillet); TCE at non-detected levels to 25 ug/L (Tillet); and PCE at non-detected levels to 2,000 ug/L (Harvey) (Ref. No. 31, pp. 14, 15, 50). In addition, tert-butylmethylether was detected in many wells during this sampling event. Highest concentrations of tert-butylmethylether were detected in the Tillet and Four Winds Plaza No. 1 wells at an estimated 470 ug/L (Ref. No. 31, pp. 14, 15, 17, 18). Low concentration of many other VOCs and semivolatiles were also detected, with the exception of methylene chloride (detected in the Harvey well at 120,000 ug/L) (Ref. No. 31, pg. 49). U. S. EPA Technical Assistance Team photovac sampling results from residential and commercial 28 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 wells between July 1987 and February 1990 indicate that VOCs were detected consistently from the commercial and residential wells. The contaminant concentration ranges of the PCE, TCE, dichloroethylene (DCE), benzene, and toluene which were consistently found in these wells are as follows: PCE at non-detected levels to 7,600 ug/L (Harvey); TCE at non-detected levels to 711 ug/L (Tillet); and DCE at non-detected levels to 620 ug/L (Tillet); benzene at non- detected levels to 6,950 ug/L (Tillet); and toluene at non-detected levels to 492 ug/L (Tillet) (Ref. No. 29, pp. 1-19). Based on the US EPA ESD laboratory and photovac results, the residential and commercial wells were closed down by the VIDPNR between July 31, 1987 and September 2, 1987 to protect public health. The wells that were closed down include Tillet (Tutu Water Wells), Steele, Elgin Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Four Winds No. 1 (Plaza Associates), Harvey. Hartman Estate, Hartman Crusher, and Hartman Estate (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 4, 11, 19, 32, B-5, B-9; 47, p. 3; 51, pp. 4, 5). The VIHA Nos. 1 and 3 were closed due to contamination, however the exact date of closure is unknown (Ref. Nos. 46. pg. 32). The Smith well was closed down or prohibited from being used in July 1987 as evidence of alternate supply and its operating status is discussed in the references (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 11, 19, 32; 47, pg. 3). In September 1990, Contract Laboratory Program analysis of samples from downgradient wells detected an observed release of TCE, PCE, 1,2-trans dichloroethylene, and cadmium. Cadmium and TCE were found above the Maximum Contaminant Levels (Ref. No. 33. pp. N-1 -N-19). Several suspected sources have been identified including gas stations, a dry cleaner, and auto repair shops. The soils from these properties were sampled and analyzed. The same indicator contaminants found in groundwater were also detected in soils from the suspected sources. Waste quantity and waste source fingerprinting has been vague. The amount of contaminants deposited at or releasing from these sources has not been defined. The groundwater contamination appears to be confined to the Turpentine Run Upper Basin (Ref. Nos. 29, pp. 1-18; 30; 31, pp. 1-89; 32; 33, pp. N-1 -N-19; 46, pp. 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11. 12, 32-37, B-1 - B-37; 47; 48. pp. 1-7). In September 1988 and June 1989, sampling and analysis of soils occurred at several suspected sources of contamination including the properties of Tutu Texaco Service Station, Tutu Esso Car Care Center, O'Henry Cleaners, Consolidated Auto Parts (Gasset Motors), Ramsay Motor Co., Department of Education Building (formerly LAG A), and Tillet Gardens (Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 1-5; 7, pp. 1-62; 8, pp. 1-5). Low levels of volatile organics such as 1,1,1- trichloroethane, trichloroethylene (TCE), and tetrachloroethylene (PCE) were also detected in an excavated soil pile at Tutu Texaco (Ref. No 8. pg. 25). Volatile organics detected in soils on the O'Henry Cleaners property were tetrachloroethane (440,000 ug/kg), 1,2-trans dichloroethylene (20 ug/kg estimated), and tetrachloroethylene (180,000 and 190,000 ug/kg) (Ref. Nos. 8, pp. 1-5, 31 ;9, pg. 3. In addition, it is known that O'Henry Cleaners stored PCE, however their disposal practices were unknown (Ref. No. 50, pp. 6, 7). Semivolatiles detected in soils at the LAGA Building included but were not limited to phenol (900,000 ug/kg), 2-methylphenol (320,000 ug/kg), and 4-methylphenol (1,300,000 ug/kg estimated). (Ref. Nos. 8, pp. 1-4, 39). Inorganic E.P. Toxicity analysis of soils identified the presence of cadmium, lead, and barium at levels below the maximum allowable limits for this test. This analysis is inconclusive for HRS purposes because it only quantifies the teachable characteristics of those compounds. In addition, there are no background soils samples for comparison (Ref. Nos. 8, pp. 16, 23, 29, 35, 42, 49; 34, pg. 406) In June 1989, waste oil samples were collected from underground storage tanks (USTs), oil/water separators, and other collection/storage vessels at Ramsay Motor Co., Tutu Texaco, and Tutu Esso. Analysis of these samples detected BTEX and other volatiles such as PCE and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (Ref. Nos. 11, 12). 29 TUT OO1 O04<"i 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 Hazardous Substances Released Cadmium, 1,2 Dichloroethylene, Trichloroethylene, and Tetrachloroethylene. Ground Water Observed Release Factor Value: 550 30 001 OO41 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 GW-Toxicity/Mobility 3.2 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS 3.2.1 Toxicttv/Mobilitv Hazardous Source Toxicity Mobility Toxicity/ Substance No. Factor Value Factor Value Mobility Ref. No. 2, Appendix B-1 Cadmium 1 10,000 1 10,000 pg. B-3 1,2 1 100 1 100 pg. B-6 Dichloroethylene Tetrachloro- 1 100 1 100 pg. B-12 ethylene Trichloro- 1 10 1 10 pg. B-13 ethylene As stated in the HRS final rule in section 3.2.1.2 of the Federal Register Vol. 55 (55 PR), No. 241, December 14, 1990, (page 51601), the following applies to this site "For any hazardous substance that meets the criteria for an observed release by chemical analysis to one or more aquifers underlying the site, regardless of the aquifer being evaluated, assign a mobility factor of 1. Toxicity/Mobiltty Factor Value: 10,000 31 001 OO42 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 GW-Hazardous Waste Quantity 3.2.2 Hazardous Waste Quantity Source Hazardous Is source hazardous Waste Quantity constituent quantity Source Number Value (Section 2.4.2.1.5) data complete? (ves/no) 1 The waste quantity for this NO groundwater cannot be ascer- tained. However, an observed release including Level I and II concentrations has been exhibited, therefore the default value for hazardous waste quantity (100) would be used, as stated in section 2.4.2.2 of the HRS final rule (55 PR 51519-51592, December 14, 1990). Sum of Values: SEE ABOVE 3.2.3 Waste Characteristics Factor Category Value Highest Toxicity/Mobility = Cadmium at 10,000 (see section 3.2.1) Hazardous Waste Quantity = 100 (see section 3.2.2) The Waste Characteristics Factor Category Value (32) is derived from Table 2-7 in section 2.4.3.1 of the HRS final rule (55 PR 51592, December 14, 1990) Toxicity/Mobility Factor Value X Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value: 1X10* 10,000 x 100 = 1 x 10e Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value: 100 Waste Characteristics Factor Category Value: 32 32 TUT' OO1 OO43 3.3 TARGETS 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 GW-Targets Distance Well From Source Aquifer Steele 0 feet Matthias 0 feet Harvey 0 feet Tillet 0 feet Smith 0 feet Bedrock Level I Contam. (Y/N) Bedrock Y Bedrock Y Bedrock Y Bedrock N Bryan #1 4,000 feet Bedrock N Bryan #2 4,000 feet Bedrock N Demitry 2,675 feet Bedrock N Level II Contam. (Y/N) N N N N N N N Potential Contam. (Y/N) Ref. Nos. N 37, pp. 2, 3, 5, 13; 38, pg. 7; 40; 42; 46, pg. 19; 53; 54 N 37, pp. 2, 3, 5, 13; 38, pg. 7; 40; 42; 53; 54 N 37, pp. 2, 3, 5, 13; 38, pg. 7; 40; 42; 46, pg. 19; 53; 54 N 37, pp. 2, 3, 5, 13; 38, pg. 8; 43, pg. 6; 53; 54 N 37, pp. 2. 3. 5. 13;38, pg. 7; 40; 42; 46, pg. 19; 53; 54 Y 37, pp. 2, 3. 5, 13; 40; 42; 53; 54 Y 37, pp. 2, 3, 5, 13; 40; 42; 53; 54 Y 37, pp. 2, 3, 5, 13; 40; 42; 53; 54 33 TUT GO 4 4 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 GW-Nearest Well 3.3.1 Nearest Well Well: Steele Level of Contamination (I, II, or potential): I If potential contamination, distance from source in miles: Nearest Well Factor Value: 50 34 TUT OOi OO45 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 GW-Level I Concentrations 3.3.2 Population 3.3.2.1 Level of Contamination 3.3.2.2 Level I Concentrations Level I Well Population Reference Harvey' 10 46, pg. 19 Steele** 28 46, pg. 19 Matthias**• 5 53. 54 Tillef** 200 53. 54 On September 2, 1987, this well was closed by the VIDPNR to protect public health due volatile organic contamination (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 4, 11, 32; 47, pg. 3; 51, pg. 5). An alternate drinking water has been provided since 1987 at and been maintained at least through March 1990 (Ref. No. 46, pg. 19; 51, pg. 6). A December 1988 Potable Water Alternatives report prepared by Roy F. Weston, Region 2 TAT indicates that this well served 10 people (Ref. No. 46, pg. 19). U.S. Geological Survey inventories from August 1990 and March 1991 indicate that this well was not being used (Ref. Nos. 37, pp. 2, 3; 38, pg. 7). In addition, a well appropriations permit list dated July 31, 1987 states that this well was permitted for domestic use in 1978 (Ref. No. 41, pg. 5). April 1991 and May correspondence with the VIDPNR indicates this well presently serves 4 people and the current usage is for flushing and secondary use (Ref. Nos. 53, 54). A population of 10 was assigned to this well because this was the population when the well was closed down or prohibited from being used. Present use of the this well also indicates that it is available for potable water usage. On September 2, 1987, this well was closed by the VIDPNR to protect public health due volatile organic contamination (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 4, 11, 32; 47, pg. 3; 51, pg. 5). An alternate drinking water has been provided since 1987 and been maintained at least through March 1990 (Ref. No. 46, pg. 19; 51, pg. 6). A December 1988 Potable Water Alternatives report prepared by Roy F. Weston, Region 2 TAT indicates that this well served 28 people (Ref. No. 46, pg. 19). U.S. Geological Survey inventories from August 1990 and March 1991 indicate that this well was being used for irrigation/stock and domestic purposes, respectively (Ref. Nos. 37, pp. 2, 3; 38, pg. 7). April 1991 and May correspondence with the VIDPNR indicates this well presently serves 20 people. The current well usage is unknown (Ref. Nos. 53, 54). A population of 28 was assigned to this well because this was the population when the well was closed down or prohibited from being used. 35 TUT 001 0046 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 '** In 1987, this well apparently was not closed down. However, PCE and TCE have been consistently detected in this well since 1987 (Ref. Nos. 30, pp. 6, 10, 14, 18; 31, pg. 52). U.S. Geological Survey inventories from August 1990 and March 1991 indicate that this well was being used for and domestic purposes (Ref. Nos. 37, pp. 2, 3; 38, pg. 7). April and May 1991 correspondence with the VIDPNR indicates that this well presently serves 5 people, however is presently used for flushing and secondary usage (Ref. Nos. 53, 54). The population served by this well obtains potable water from an alternate. It is not known whether this well was ever used for potable purposes. It was counted as part of the "Level I" population because it is not closed down and remains available for potable usage. >••• On July 31.1987, the Tillet well (Tutu Water Wells) was closed by the VIDPNR to protect public health due to volatile organic contamination (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 4, 11, 32, B-5, B-9; 47, pg. 3; 51, pg. 5). U.S. Geological Survey inventories from August 1990 and March 1991 indicate that this well was not being used (Ref. Nos. 37, pp. 2. 3, 5; 38, pg. 8). April and May 1991 correspondence with the VIDPNR indicates that this well is presently not being used, however it serves 200 people when operational (Ref. Nos. 53, 54). A population of 200 was assigned to this well because this was the population when the well was closed down. Population Served by Level I Wells: 243 Level I Concentrations Factor Value: 2430 36 TUT 001 OO47 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 GW-Levei II Concentrations 3.3.2.3 Level II Concentrations Level II Well Population Reference Smith* 12 46, pg. 19 The Smith Well was closed down or prohibited from being used in July 1987 as evidence of alternate drinking water supply and its operating status is discussed in the references (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 11, 19. 32; 47, pg. 3, 17; 51, pg. 6). A December 1988 Potable Water Alternatives report prepared by Roy F. Weston, Region 2 TAT indicates that this well served 12 people (Ref. No. 46, pg. 19). U.S. Geological Survey inventories from August 1990 and March 1991 indicate that this well was being used for domestic purposes (Ref. Nos. 37, pp. 2, 3; 38, pg. 7). April 1991 correspondence with the VIDPNR indicates that this well presently serves 8 people. In addition, it is not known whether the well is presently being used for drinking purposes (Ref. Nos. 53, 54). A population of 12 was assigned to this well because this was the population when the well was closed down or prohibited from being used. Population served by Level II Wells: 12 Level II Concentrations Factor Value: 12 37 'TUT 001 CO 4 8 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 GW-Potential Contamination 3.3.2.4 Potential Contamination Well N/A N/A Bryan #1 Bryan #2 Demitry N/A N/A N/A Distance Category 0- 1/4 mile 1/4- 1/2 mile 1/2-1 mile 1/2-1 mile 1/2-1 mile 1 - 2 miles 2 - 3 miles 3-4 miles Population 0 0 509* 509* 509* 0 0 0 Reference N/A N/A 37, pp. 2, 3, 5, 13; 43, pp. 93. 94; 45, PQ. 19; 53; 54; 55 N/A N/A N/A Distance-Weighted Population Value 0 0 523 N/A N/A 0 0 0 Between 1987 and the present, wells owned and operated by the Virgin Island Housing Authority (VIHA) in the Tutu projects were closed. Residents of the projects then attained their potable water via trucking, bottled water, and water mains from other public supply wells. The Bryan and Demitry wells are presently two of the suppliers serving the VIHA via water main. In 1989, 1,528 people at the Tutu VIHA were reportedly being serve potable water via cistern. It is therefore assumed that the potential population has not changed and the Bryan and Demitry wells would serve a portion or all of the population at the VIHA. No information is available on apportionment of water to the VIHA. It is assumed that each of the three wells serve the VIHA equally (509 people/well) (Ref. Nos. 37, pp. 2, 3, 5, 13; 43, pp. 93, 94; 45. pg. 19; 53; 54; 55). Sum of Distance-Weighted Population Values: 523 Potential Contamination Factor Value: 52 38 TUT 001 0049 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 GW-Resources 3.3.3 RESOURCES Well Aouifer Resource Use Reference N/A N/A N/A Resources Factor Value: 39 TUT' 001 0050 02-9102-11-HR Rev. No. 1 GW-Wellhead Protection Area 3.3.4 WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA Area Use Reference Value There are no known wellhead protection areas within 0 4 miles of the site. Wellhead Protection Area Factor Value: 0 40 TUT OO1 GO51 SECTION IVrRQURES L .•: ••-•'. TUT 001 COS2 Rev. No. 1 *^^li v-^*« :aa*faf lr-;j;v* \\ TUTU WELLFIELD .SS (APPROXIMATE LOCATION)! VIRGIN ISLANOS (QUAD) EASTERN ST. THOMAS, USVI SITE LOCATION MAP TUTU WELLF1ELD, ST. THOMAS, USVI SCALE: r* 2000 FIGURE 1 IMUS TUT 00.1 OO5J Rev. No. i SITE MAP TUTU WELLF1ELD ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 2 IMLJE CXDRFOPATO TUT OO1 0054 REFERENCE NO.1 TUT 001 OO55 12-14-90 Vot 55 NO. 241 Friday December 14, 1990 Book 2 II United States Government Printing Office SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS Washington. DC 20402 SECOND CLASS NEWSPAPER PosUg* and Fe«s Paid US Gov»mm»nt Printing Office (ISSN 0097-6326I OFFICIAL BUSINESS Penalty tor private use. J300 TUT 001 O056 TOO ini I -I I I I I I I 1 1 I Z -ON 30N3U3d3d ll IIIII 1 1 1 1 1 -A /' J tt. S & M CRANCM SUPERFUND CHEMICAL DATA MATRIX DATA SOURCES November 27,1990 TUT 001 GO53 REFERENCE NO. 2 SUPERFUND CHEMICAL DATA MATRIX April, 1991 TUT 001 O060 I I I I REFERENCE NO. 3 "UT 001 0061 CDM i cderal Programs Corporacion September 19, 1968 Ms. Caroline Kwan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10278 Project: EPA Contract No. 68-01-7331 Document No. T648-C02-EP-CJLY-1 Subject: Updated Technical Review of Documents Tutu Wellfield/Supercat Laundromat CERCLA 104(e) Responses W.A. 648 and W.A. 821 Dear Ms. Kwan: Enclosed is the updated technical review of nine CERCLA 104(e) responses submitted by 1) O'Henry Cleaners 2) Ramsay Motors, Inc. 3) Consolidated Auto Parts Inc. 4) Rodriquez Auto Parts, Inc. 5) Esso Tutu Car Care Center 6) Texaco Tutu Service Station 7) Jim Tillet, Inc. 8) Caribbean Jeep and Car Rental and 9) Virgin Island Housing Authority. It is recommended that further site investigations be conducted as soon as possible at the above mentioned facilities or other areas of concern to complete this review, information on potential sources and potential contaminants of concern may not have been noted in the CERCLA 104(e) responses. Please return any comments or suggested changes to me or Robert Goltz. Sincerely, CDM Federal Programs Corporation Scott Grader Work Assignment Manager SG:mm Attachment cc: Jose Font, CFO Francine Lang, DPNR Amy Chester, ORC NYC File E. Sayed, CDM FPC - HQ (SG2/7) 59 John Sam, Eighth ROOT New York, NY 10038 2123934634 TUT 001 0061 (/Henry Cleaners Mztors, Inc. (trtamnant(s) of Cbncem -Dry cleaning (i.e. tetrachloroe- thylene- PCE) 2-butOKyethanol hexylane glyool Rjst-GD (IF acid) -EX-Pedite degreaser -E^-Cua-it Process(es) Recycling of FOB Use/transfer of PCE of FCE volatile solvents) Dye Stripper Used oil Kerosene -*SEP degreaser (naptha, solvents Potent^ Source Leaching pit Sunp holding tank Raw naterial storage area Above ground fuel tank 5 gallon containers of spent FCE (filter values or dry) FCE residue 55-gallcn druoB PCE 2000-gallcn aboveground tank Potential Pelease/Rute Sfrillage of FCE to grounoVBter/surfaoe veter/ soil/ air (inferred) Obments ( PCE ray not be the only dry cleaning fiinH used, tto other infix- nation vas available on the dry cleaning operation Ajtomotive service Car engine cleaning Deposition of oil IBT (block and nectar tank) IET to grajndwater/goil Druns (inferred) kerosene to and from underground storage tank (LET) petroleum distillates, ethoMylated nonyl >_ - % _ _ > I m f^fpl - I Ml w ^fftf All grades SfE motor oil *Godd hand cleaner (ncnoxynol, petro- leum distillates) -*S1P Garb spray (xylene, butyl oellosolve, un- specified solvents) Transmission fiinH -"Brake cleaner (1,1,1- trichloroethane, per- crxiQcmjtJryLsnBy CMTX^I dioxide propellent) *Kendall antifreeze and coolant (ethylene gly- col additives) WMO Lubricant (petro- leum distillates) Injector fluid Radiator flush Gasoline 1. Contaminant constituents included in parentheses, vten known, fix ocmnercial products listed. 2. "*" indicates that listing of hazardous ingredients is supported by fbterial Safety Data Sheet-? (MSB) 3. "**" indicates that hpogMrfriK ingredients are listed elsewhere in table, based on other respondent's 4. "-" indicates that product probably contains a chlorinated solvent. -1- JimTillPtt, Inc. Contaninant(s) of Cbnoem -Stater-based dyes (amcniun hydroxide, mineral spirits) including Plastioue Ptccess(es) Fabric silk screening aqueous residue is Gvspootod onto $?FX? Which is di spread of Potent/ Source Runt containers; raw material storage area Potential teleaae/feute Cne drain to unknown des- tination; second drain to evaporation pit. Cements All colors are clflimnrl to be voter-based. Silver Pearl No. 1120EL off-site Marten Thidool NO. 359 Marten Thiokol No. 475 Caribbean Jeep and Car Rantal Unleaded gasoline Consolidated Vteste oil Auto Parts, Inc. Engine Fluids -"Ch9nical5"(auto) various grades of motor oil Storage and transfer of product to and from UST Autcodtive service Storage of waste prcducts in druoos (unoowered-infierred) Storage of caw LET: gasoline (JBI^pipes to grounoVater, surface water, soil 55 gal druns of waste oil Shallow ditch near the service bays Service yard/bays Drums of products Drums to gcoundwater/ surface vater/storn drains/ in site runoff noted in Based on limited knowledge of tenant; need to oonficm/ expand information with cvnei (Bsso, St. Unas) A list of chemicals used/ sold was not provided Service bays/^erd to storm drains Virgin Islands ftousing Authority tydraulic fluid storage of hydraulic fliriri inlBT dealership; LET; hydraulic hoists lines to graundwater/surface vater/ soil (inferred) 1. Ccntzninant constituents included in parentheses, when known, for oomercial products 2. "*" indicates that listing of hazardous ingredients is sufpxted by Ifeterial Safety Data Sheets (ffitB). 3. "**" indicates that hazacdbus ingredients are listed elsewhere in table, based on other cespondent's M9S. 4. "-" indicates that product probably contains a chlorinated solvent. Property was used by TtopLca 96 fln hydraulic hoists, prior to usebyvniV. YMV official cevealed p ^ ** ^ ij*i UST containing hydraulic ^H"d use to operate hoists. The UST existence has not been verified,. -2- Ccntantnant(s) of Concern Ptooess(es) Rjtentiaf uroe ttapentiai Release/Rxite Rodriguez Eferts Oil Gasoline Kerosene Xylene -Sell sol (low aronatic Oute spirit/fetcctiard solvent) Groase Ajtonotive service Storage/transfer of waste products to pit and dcuns Texaco Tutu Gasoline Service Station used oil *l<totor Flush (xylene, petcoleun AJtnnotive service Storage/transfer of products to and from USE; -**SIP degreaser -**STPCarb spray Drive and dean Gasoline Detergent Tvo (5000 gad) USls: Super Premiim and Regular unleaded Underground pit used to collect oil from the garage collection (used until 7 or 8 yrs ago) (cement) to Old car wash drain lines Gild drain to sewer USls/pipes to groundMater(GW)/soiV surface voter (SW) underground pit (until 1966) to collect "gray" voter from the car vash Drum of product IFIs - Unleaded/leadad gasoline i*» Separator Car care floor drain Car care catch basins Drum storage area Old car vash drain lines to O-i/SK/Soil Oenant cistern to sewer to groundwBter/&uirface vater/toil Catch basins to sewer Mr. R>;ii ifjw. nay have purchased a franchise from Bssan and wnilf" ri> an affiliate of Esso. UStt were removed from service as follows: 1 (4,000 gals) tank July '80 Out of svce f*^ to g^p»ft*jd leak (BetrotiteTest); 2 (4,000 gals) tanks July '80 Cut of service due to failing mechanical integrity test. The tank installation is not ! with a lining system. It is indicated that the tank piping WB6 rpplanaH fiy tO a pinhole in one of the pipes (Pipeline test perfiooned). chemicals were used but a chemical list was not provided. VW77 letter indicated 2242 gals of premium gasoline loss attri- buted to pipeline leaks (other letters 1. Contaminant constituents inckrfed in parentheses, vhen known, for ccmnercial products 2. "*" indicates that listing of hazardaus ingredients is supported by fbterial Safety Data Sheets (M!£). 3. "**" indicates that hazardous ingredients are listed elsewhere in table, based on other respondnet's VEDB. 4. "-" indicates that product probably contains a chlorinated solvent. Qrtamnant(s) of Concern Esso Tutu Car Care Center (hale ited Gasoline (feed oil -Frecn R72 hydc Antifreeze (ethylene glyool) Battery fluid Rawer steering fluid -*MXur flush SIP gas treatment A.O.K. gas treatnent -fuel injection cleaner Pics&l fi^^ QondL Transmission Seal/xrd. Wyrns Friction Proof Wyrre Spitfire trtmnt Wyms top cylinder oil Super radiator flush Water puop lube Tinjrid radiator sealer R-6 Bar's Step leak Super octane trtnEnt Dry gas treatment Upholstery cleaner -Chrcne cleaner -Magvheel cleaner -Bug and tar reamer WhitEvall tire cleaner -Spoke and wire cleaner cleaner Prooe^ s) Ajtcoctive service Storage/transer of products to and/tx vasteprcdrts to and fromlBIs Source Puoanial QCmnents Uileadad/Leaded gasoline UST- 2000 gal oil tank (cistern) in mechanic shop f>qr care area flcr drain Mechanic shop floor drain Drain lines to sever UBIs/pipss to grcunduater/ surface vater/soil -**Grake cleaner Silicon spray Penetrating oil Bust Oleutt undercoat WD40 lube spray Brake Quiet spray Ignition dryer spray White lithiun grease Bat. term, protector High tesp. brg. grease <'ift^i^ oil powder y^H^t'or' g^^l^f* numerous car vax products Brake fluid A.O.K. Octane Boost ND ceoords maintained en oil IBT. Results of 7/27-26^87 tank test indicated that tie structural integrity of the premium unleaded UBT was qjesticned since the petrotite test was sl»'n*«i <^»» to a p^BgiHiA leak; stand pp» <^»s decreasing. . CtntanLnant constituents induced in parentheses, vhen kncwi, for oumeiual products listed. 2. "*" indicates that listing of hazarcbus ingredients is supported by ifeterial safety Data Sheets (I6S). 3. "**" indicates that hazardous ingredients are listed elsewhere in table, based on other respondent's HSDS. 4. "-" indicates that product probably contains a chlorinated solvent. o It" I I I r . . • • , ... i I REFERENCE NO. 4 1 I I TUT 001 006" 00, 7 02-8902-40-PA REV. NO. 1 FINAL DRAFT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT TUTU TEXACO ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS PREPARED UNDER TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE DOCUMENT NO. 02-8902-40 CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7346 FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY MARCH 31,1989 REVISE DM AY 26.1989 NUS CORPORATION SUPERFUND DIVISION SUBMITTED BY: ' / f ,&/>Lr' ^AjLiJi DIAftE TRUBE PROJECT MANAGER REVIEWED/APPROVED BY: SEPHWAYO ITE MANAGER RONALD M. NAMAN FIT OFFICE MANAGER TUT 001 OO68 02-8902-40-PA Rev. No. 1 POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT PART I: SITE INFORMATION 1. 2. 3 4. 8. 9. Site Name/Alias Tutu Texaco Street Route 38 and Route 384 City St. Thomas (Tutu District) County N/A State U.S. Virgin Islands Zip 08002 County Code N/A Cong. Dist. N/A ERA ID No. New Site Latitude 18°20'34"N. Longitude 64° 53' t8"W. USGS Quad. Eastern St. Thomas. U.S. Virgin Islands Owner Texaco Caribbean Tel. No. 809-774-1931 Street PO Box 3740 City Charlotte Amalie Operator Unknown Street________ City_________ State U.S. Virgin Island Zip 00801 Tel. No.________________ State Type of Ownership [x] Private D County Q Municipal Q State Q Unknown D Other. Owner/Operator Notification on File D RCRA 3001 Date ______ [xj None D Unknown Permit Information Permit Permit No. Date Issued None __ ________ _______ QCERCLA103C Date Expiration Date Comments 10. Site Status ra Active 11. Years of Operation Inactive Unknown Q Unknown to Present UT 001 006C I I I I I 1 02-8902-40-PA Rev. No. 1 12. Identify the types of waste units (e.g.. landfill, surface impoundment, piles, stained soil, above- or below-ground tanks or containers, land treatment, etc.) on site. Initiate as many waste unit numbers as needed to identify all waste sources on site. (a) Waste Management Areas Waste Unit No. Waste Unit Type Facility Name for Unit 1 _______Drums________ Waste Oil Drums_________ 2 Underground Storage Tanks Waste Oil Underground Storage Tanks (b) Other Areas of Concern Identify any miscellaneous spills, dumping, etc. on site; describe the materials and identify their locations on site. No other spiHs. incidents of dumping, etc, were observed on the site during the t^S Corp. Region 2 FITon-site reconnaissance on 2/15/89. 13. Information available from Contact Amy Bcochu______ Aaencv U.S. ERA_______ Tel. No. (201)906-6802 Preoarer Joseph Mavo_____ Agency NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT Date 03/31/89_____ 'TUT 001 00'70 02-8902-40-PA Rev. No. 1 PART II: WASTE SOURCE INFORMATION For each of the waste units identified in Part I. complete the following six items. Waste Unit 1 - ____Drums______, Waste Oil Drums 1. Identify the RCRA status and permit history, if applicable, and the age of the waste unit. There are no known RCRA permits for this waste unit. The age of this waste unit is unknown. Until June 1986, the Water and Power Authority (WAPA) accepted waste oil and used it for fuel. A batch of waste oil was found to contain polychlormated biphenyls (PCBs), and WAPA stopped accepting waste oil. Currently, there is no acceptable method for disposal of waste oil on St. Thomas. Waste oil generators must store all their oil. 2. Describe the location of the waste unit and identify clearly on the site map. The waste unit is located in the northern corner of the Tutu Texaco property. 3. Identify the size or quantity of the waste unit (e.g., area or volume of a landfill or surface impoundment, number and capacity of drums or tanks). Specify the quantity of hazardous substances in the waste unit. There are twenty-seven 55-gallon drums in the waste unit. Twenty-five of these drums contain waste oil generated from automotive repair and servicing operations. The remaining two drums reportedly contain dirt. There are also three 20-gallon drums and a few 5-gallon pails containing waste oil on site. The total quantity of waste in this unit is approximately 1420 gallons. 4. Identify the physical state(s) of the waste type(s) as disposed of in the waste unit. The physical state(s) should be categorized as follows: solid, powder or fines, sludge, slurry, liquid, or gas. Twenty-five of the drums contain liquid waste oil. Two of the drums reportedly contain dirt which is a solid. 5. Identify specific hazardous substance(s) known or suspected to be present in the waste unit. Twenty-five of the drums on site contain liquid waste oil from automotive repair and servicing operations. This oil may contain small quantities of gasoline, kerosene, or degreasing solvents. Sample analyses of waste oil from the Tutu Texaco station reportedly detected the presence of trichloroethane (TCA). However, the analysis results were invalidated because the sample holding times were exceeded. 6. Describe the containment of the waste unit as it relates to contaminant migration via groundwater, surface water, and air. The waste in the unit is contained in drums that are stored on a concrete surface. There are no berms or curbs to contain the oil in the event of a spill. There is evidence of spills in the storage area, and the bung on one of the drums was open. An OVA flame ionization detector noted a reading of 20 ppm from the open drum. There were no readings above background in the ambient air in the drum storage area. The lack of containment of the waste unit provides the potential for release to surface water by runoff from spills and for release to groundwater by runoff and subsequent percolation through soil. Ref Nos 1.21.22.24 TUT OO1 O071 02-8902-40-PA Rev. No. 1 PART II: WASTE SOURCE INFORMATION For each of the waste units identified in Part I, complete the following six items. Waste Unit 2 - Underground Storage Tanks . Waste Oil Underground Storage Tanks 1. Identify the RCRA status and permit history, if applicable, and the age of the waste unit. There are no known RCRA permits for this waste unit. The age of this waste unit is unknown. Until June 1986, the Water and Power Authority (WAPA) accepted waste oil and used it for fuel. A batch of waste oil was found to contain PCBs, and WAPA stopped accepting waste oil Currently, there is no acceptable method for disposal of waste oil on St. Thomas. Waste oil generators must store all their oil. 2. Describe the location of the waste unit and identify clearly on the site map. The exact location of the waste unit is unknown as the tanks were not observed during the on- site reconnaissance conducted by NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT on 2/15/89. A preliminary investigation conducted by the Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) on 8/5/87 indicated the presence of two underground storage tanks. One tank had a concrete top and a concrete partition, and the second tank was covered with a square steel plate. The volume and composition of the tanks were not determined. The material in the tanks is reported to be waste oil. 3. Identify the size or quantity of the waste unit (e.g., area or volume of a landfill or surface impoundment, number and capacity of drums or tanks). Specify the quantity of hazardous substances in the waste unit. The capacity of the tanks and the quantity of waste in the unit are unknown. 4. Identify the physical state(s) of the waste type(s) as disposed of in the waste unit. The physical state(s) should be categorized as follows: solid, powder or fines, sludge, slurry, liquid, or gas. The physical state of the waste is liquid. 5. Identify specific hazardous substance(s) known or suspected to be present in the waste unit. The waste unit contains automotive waste oil. Substances such as gasoline, kerosene, and degreasing solvents may be present in the oil. Samples of Tutu Texaco waste oil were reported to contain TCA. However, the sample analysis results were invalidated because the sample holding times were exceeded. 6. Describe the containment of the waste unit as it relates to contaminant migration via groundwater, surface water, and air. The containment of the waste unit is unknown. The tanks are covered, but no other information concerning the tanks' waste containment properties is available. Ref Nos. 1.21.22.24______________ ("5 ** 02-8902-40-PA Rev. No. 1 PART III: HAZARD ASSESSMENT GROUNDWATER ROUTE 1. Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the groundwater as follows: observed, alleged, potential, or none. Identify the contaminant(s) detected or suspected, and provide a rationale for attributing the contaminants) to the facility. The potential exists for wastes on the Tutu Texaco Site to be released to groundwater. There is evidence (photo No. R3-P10) that spilled oil is staining soil and may be transported to groundwater. There are no berms or curbs to contain the waste from the drums in the event of a spill. One of the drums was open. The drums on site contain automotive waste oil. Air monitoring instrument readings indicate that organic vapors are present in one of the drums. It is reported that samples of waste oil collected from the site contained TCA. However, the sample analysis results were invalidated because the sample holding times were exceeded. There is insufficient information available to evaluate a release from the underground storage tank for waste oil as the construction and integrity of this tank are unknown. There are no reports of spills or leaks from this tank; however, waste oil in the tank is being stored in violation of U.S. Virgin Islands laws. Ref. No. 1,22,24 2. Describe the aquifer of concern; include information such as depth, thickness, geologic composition, permeability, overlying strata, confining layers, interconnections, discontinuities, depth to water table, groundwater flow direction. The rock units of St. Thomas and St. John are divided into three major groups: The Water Island Formation, the Virgin Island Group, and an unnamed group made up of one or more dioritic plutons. The Water Island Formation, which is late lower Cretaceous in age, consists of keratophyre and spiHates. The Virgin Island Group, which is probably early Cretaceous or Albian in age, consists of andesitic-pyroclastic rocks and sedimentary formations. The Virgin Island Group is divided into four formations: the Louisenhoj Formation, which consists of augite-andesite breccia, tuff, and conglomerate; the Outer Brass Limestone which consists of partially silicified-tuffaceous-radiolarian-limestone; the Tutu Formation, which consists of tuffaceous wacke, including megabreccia near the base and limestone near the top; and the Hans Lollik Formation, which may be Eocene in age, and consists of augite-andesite breccia and tuff. The final group is made up of one or more dioritic plutons. These unamed dikes and plugs of quartz - andesine-hornblende porphory are Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary in age. Alluvium deposits are quarternary in age. The Water Island Formation, which consists of 95 percent volcanic flow breccias, was probably extruded on a relatively level ocean floor. The absence of terrigenous sediments from this formation indicates that there were no emergent islands present in the area at the time of extrusion. Emergent islands would have served as a source of weather sediments or detritus, whic-fi is not present in this formation. There is evidence that sea floor subsidence occurred during the greater part of the accumulation of this formation. However, the subsidence was not rapid enough to maintain a constant water level, thereby causing explosive erruptions near the top of the formation. Regional uplift occurred near the end of Water Island time. TUT OOi 02-8902-40-PA Rev. No. 1 The Louisenhoj Formation of the Virgin Island Group unconformably overlies the Water Island Formation and crops out on about half of the land area on St. Thomas. Pillsbury sound between St. Thomas and St. John was the origin of this formation. Evidence of this center is based upon the coarseness of volcanic eject a in the formation in nearby eastern St. Thomas and western St. John. Material is less coarse and tuffs are more predominant further east and west away from the pluton. This augite-andesite formation ranges in thickness from 4,000 to 13,000 feet. In certain areas of St. Thomas and St. John conglomerates are interbedded with andesitic rocks at the base of this formation. The depositional environment of this conglomerate varies from location to location throughout the formation. The Outer Brass Formation of the Virgin Island Group is mostly siliceous limestone, which overlies the Louisenhoj Formation. This limestone formation is an offshore deposit formed by radiolarian and foraminiferal remains including a minor amount of tuff. Thicknesses are known to be up to at least 600 feet. Overlying the Outer Brass Formation is the Tutu Formation. The Tutu Formation is fine- to coarse-grained volcanic wackes, which are termed flysch. This formation is derived from eroding sediments from the Louisenhoj andesites. Exposed thicknesses are known to be as much as 6000 feet. Within this formation, a megabreccia lithofacies with an average thickness of 30 feet and a limestone member with thickness up to 300 feet are worth mentioning. The Hans Lollik Formation, which consists of at least 10,000 feet of augite-andesite pyroclastic rocks, crops out on Little Hans Lollik Island. Oioritic plutons are located in Pillsbury Sound between St. Thomas and St. John; the narrows, between St. John and the British Virgin Islands; and south of St. Thomas. The exact delineation of these plutons is uncertain. Throughout the islands isolated dikes of quartz-andesine porphyries, andesine-hornblende porphyries, lamprophyres, breccias, and pegmatites appear. Folding occurred after the deposition of the Virgin Island Group. Rocks were tilted to form a northward-dipping homocline, which is cut by sets of faults trending N 45°W, N 55°E and north. Well-defined joint sets parallel each of the major fault trends. Dips range from 15° to 90° with the average being 40°. Strike-slip faults have horizontal offsets of less than 1 mile. Two major strike-slip graben structures or fault systems exist. The first passes through Redhook, St. Thomas and the eastern tip of Lovango Cay. The second crosses St. John, from Contact Point on the southwest to Brown's Bay on the northeast. Most recently. Pleistocene to Holocene alluvial deposits occurred primarily in coastal embayments. However, a narrow bank of alluvium extends up to Turpentine Run on the east end of the island. Most of these deposits are composed of silt, clay, and thin, discontinuous beds of sand and gravel. Maximum thickness of these is 50 feet. Groundwater movement is limited to openings and joints along fault zones. Regional geologic information is insufficient to determine whether these fractures and fault zones are present in all of the above-described formations; however, for this report it is assumed that the fractures and fault zones are present in all of these formations. The valleys on the island are the result of weak zones caused by faulting and jointing and are primary recharge areas for groundwater. Alluvial deposits have a high porosity but low permeability, making this aquifer unfavorable for groundwater production. In coastal embankments throughout the island, saltwater intrusion is widespread in alluvial deposits. In most areas, alluvial deposits are interconnected with bedrock and act to recharge precipitation to the underlying bedrock. TUT 001 0074 02-8902-40-PA Rev. No. 1 The direction of groundwater flow in the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer is south-southeast which is generally along the direction of flow of Turpentine Run. Depth to groundwater in the aquifer ranges from 5 to 60 feet, arid the altitude of the water level ranges from 1 to 209 feet above mean sea level. Ref. Nos. 9,11,16 3. Is a designated sole source aquifer within 3 miles of the site? No sole source aquifer, as designated in the Federal Register, is located within 3 miles of the site. Ref No. 8 4. What is the depth from the lowest point of waste disposal/storage to the highest seasonal level of the saturated zone of the aquifer of concern? Drums are stored on a cement floor at ground level. The lowest point of the waste oil underground storage tank is unknown but is assumed to be at least 6 feet. Depth to groundwater in Virgin Island Housing Authority (VIHA) well Nos. 1 and 2, which are located approximately 500 feet northeast of the site, is reported to be 56 and 60 feet, respectively. Therefore, the depth from the lowest point of storage to the highest seasonal level of the saturated zone of the aquifer of concern is approximately 50 feet. Ref. Nos. 1,2,9 5. What is the permeability value of the least permeable continuous intervening stratum between the ground surface and the aquifer of concern? There are no continuous intervening strata between the ground surface and the bedrock aquifer. Soils are generally thin in the area around the site. The water-bearing formations in the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer are composed primarily of fractured and jointed volcanic rocks. The range of hydraulic conductivities associated with these formations is 10-3 to 10-5 cm/sec. Ref. Nos. 10, 11, 16 6. What is the net precipitation for the area? Net precipitation is usually calculated by subtracting mean annual lake evaporation (a surrogate measure for evapotranspiration) from normal annual total precipitation. Mean annual lake evaporation information was not available for St. Thomas; however, evapotranspiration data were available. These data indicate that 95.8 percent of the incident precipitation on St. Thomas is lost through evapotranspiration. The normal annual total precipitation for St. Thomas is 43.74 inches, but because of orographic effects on the island, normal annual total precipitation can range from 35 inches to 50 inches over short distances. In the Turpentine Run Basin, normal annual precipitation is 40 inches. Calculations for net precipitation are provided below: 40 inches precipitation x 95.8 percent lost to evapotranspiration = 38.32 inches lost to evapotranspi ration 40 inches precipitation - 38.32 inches lost to evapotranspiration = 1.68 inches net precipitation Ref Nos 3, 5, 12, 13 001 OO75 02-8902-40-PA Rev. No. 1 7. Identify uses of groundwater within 3 miles of the site (i.e., private drinking source, municipal source, commercial, industrial, irrigation, unusable). Groundwater within 3 miles of the site is used as a source of private and municipal drinking water, and for commercial purposes. There are at least 41 wells within 2 miles of the site. Thirty-four of these wells are within 1 mile of the site. Sixteen of these wells have been closed because they are contaminated with volatile organic compounds. Ref. Nos. 6, 9 What is the distance to and depth of the nearest well that is currently used for drinking or irrigation purposes? Distance 500 feet_________ Depth 150 feet__________ The nearest well is the VIHA well No. 2, which is located approximately 500 feet northeast of Texaco. This well is believed to be used for drinking. A nearby well, VIHA No. 1, was ordered closed because of contamination with volatile organic compounds. VIHA weM\No. 2 is not listed as being closed for contamination, and its designated use is for domestic ^jfc05*5- Ref. Nos. 6,9 9. Identify the population served by the aquifer of concern within a 3-mile radius of the site. It is difficult to estimate the population served by groundwater on St. Thomas as there are few records available on groundwater withdrawal, sale, and transport. The locations of some wells in St. Thomas are unknown, and there are reports of illegal drilling on the island. It is estimated that there are 500 to 600 private wells on St. Thomas. Most of these are used for nondrinking domestic purposes such as washing and flushing, although some may be used for drinking. There are a number of wells that are used for commercial purposes. Water from these wells is trucked to private houses and pumped into cisterns to augment the rainwater collected from roofs. Groundwater is also bottled and sold in supermarkets. There are at least 41 wells in the Turpentine Run Basin. Recently 16 of these wells have been ordered closed because they were found to be contaminated with volatile organic compounds. One of these wells was a major supplier of water to the eastern end of the island. Estimates of the population using groundwater as a source of drinking water range from none to approximately 11,000-the population of the Turpentine Run Basin which is not served by water from the desalinization plant. The actual population served by groundwater is probably less than 11,000, as desalinated water and water from wells outside the 3-mile radius is trucked into the area. Ref. Nos. 9,13.15, 18,19 SURFACE WATER ROUTE 10. Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminants) to surface water as follows: observed, alleged, potential, or none. Identify the contaminants) detected or suspected, and provide a rationale for attributing the contaminants to the facility. A potential exists for contaminants to be transported to surface water. There were some spills in the drum storage area, and there were no containment structures around the drums to prevent migration of the spills. TUT 001 007.; 02-8902-40-PA Rev. No. 1 The drums contain waste oil generated from automotive repair and maintenance activities. Air monitoring instruments indicated the presence of organic vapors in an open drum on site. Samples of waste oil from the Tutu Texaco Site were reported to contain TCA. However, the sample analysis results were invalidated because the sample holding times were exceeded. The waste oil may also contain small quantities of substances such as gasoline, kerosene, and degreasing solvents. Ref. Nos. 1,22,24 11. Identify and locate the nearest downslope surface water. If possible, include a description of possible surface drainage patterns from the site. The nearest downslope surface water is the Mangrove Lagoon, which is hydraulically connected to the Caribbean Sea. The distance from the site to the nearest surface water along the course of Turpentine Run, an intermittent stream that drains the Turpentine Run Basin, is 2.5 miles. There are a number of storm sewers near the site, and it is possible that these sewers may intercept much of the runoff from the site. It is unknown where the storm sewers discharge, but it is suspected that they discharge to Turpentine Run as it is the only drainage pathway from the basin. Ref. Nos. 2, 4, 5 12. What is the facility slope in percent? (Facility slope is measured from the highest point of deposited hazardous waste to the most downhill point of the waste area or to where contamination is detected.) The facility slope is relatively flat with a slight slope toward the south-southwest. Facility slope is estimated to be 0 to 3 percent. Ref. Nos. 1,2 13. What is the slope of the intervening terrain in percent? (Intervening terrain slope is measured from the most downhill point of the waste area to the probable point of entry to surface water.) The slope of the intervening terrain cannot be calculated, as runoff may discharge to storm sewers and the path of these sewers is unknown. If runoff follows an overland route, the slope of the intervening terrain could be as follows: • Elevation of waste area - 200 ft • Elevation at point of entry -Oft • Path length-13000ft 200 ft - 0 ft x 100 = 1.5 percent 13.000 Ref. Nos. 1,2 OO1 0077 02-8902-40-PA Rev No. 1 14. What is the 1-year 24-hour rainfall? One-year 24-hour rainfall data were not available for the U.S. Virgin Islands. However, it is known that rains exceeding 1 inch in 24 hours occur six or seven times a year on St. Thomas. It has also been reported that it is not uncommon for 24-hour rainfalls to be 2 to 3 inches. Ref Nos. 4, 6 15. What is the distance to the nearest downslope surface water? Measure the distance along a course that runoff can be expected to follow. The nearest downslope surface water is the Mangrove Lagoon which is hydraulically connected to the Caribbean Sea. The distance from the site to the lagoon is 2.S miles. It appears that most runoff from the site enters storm drains near the site. Since the point of discharge and the route of these storm drains are unknown, the distance to the nearest downslope surface water along the pathway is unknown. Ref. No. 2 16. Identify uses of surface waters within 3 miles downstream of the site (i.e., drinking, irrigation, recreation, commercial, industrial, not used). Surface water within 3 miles downstream of the site is used for recreation including swimming, fishing, and boating. The OPNR has designated the area of the Mangrove Lagoon for preservation and conservation recreation. Ref. Nos. 2,14 17. Describe any wetlands, greater than 5 acres in area, within 2 miles downstream of the site. Include whether it is a freshwater or coastal wetland. There are no wetlands greater than 5 acres within 2 miles downstream of the site. However, there is a coastal mangrove wetland approximately 2.5 miles downstream. The Mangrove Swamp is designated as a preservation area in the Coastal Zone Management Program of the DPNR. Ref. Nos. 2, 14 18. Describe any critical habitats of federally listed endangered species within 2 miles of the site along the migration path. There are no known critical habitats of federally endangered species within 2 miles of the site. The Virgin Islands Tree Boa (Epicrates monensis qranti) is an endangered species in the U.S. Virgin Islands; however, no critical habitat has been identified for this species. Ref. No. 7 19. What is the distance to the nearest sensitive environment along or contiguous to the migration path (if any exist within 2 miles)? There are no sensitive environments within 2 miles of the site that lie along or contiguous to the migration pathway. Ref Nos 2, 7, 14 TUT Out. 02-8902-40-PA Rev. No 1 20. Identify the population served or acres of food crops irrigated by surface water intakes within 3 miles downstream of the site and the distance to the intake(s). There is no population served or food crops irrigated by surface water intakes within 3 miles downstream of the site. The nearest surface water is saline. There is a desalinization plant which uses sea water to supply drinking water, but the intake is greater than 3 miles from the site. Ref. Nos 2, 13 21. What is the state water quality classification of the water body of concern? No water quality classification is known to exist for the Mangrove Lagoon or the Caribbean Sea, although the mangrove swamp surrounding the lagoon is designated as a preservation area by theDPNR. Ref. No. 14 22. Describe any apparent biota contamination that is attributable to the site. There was no apparent evidence of biota contamination noted during the on-site reconnaissance conducted by NUS Corp Region 2 FIT on February 15, 1989. Ref No. 1 AIR ROUTE 23. Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the air as follows: observed, alleged, potential, none. Identify the contaminant(s) detected or suspected, and provide a rationale for attributing the contaminant(s) to the facility. The potential for release of contaminants to the air is very small. Above-background concentrations of organic vapors were detected in a drum; however, no readings above background were detected in the ambient air in the drum storage area. The drums on site contain waste oil from automotive repair and servicing operations. The oil may contain small quantities of gasoline, kerosene, or degreasing solvents. Samples of waste oil from the facility were reported to contain TCA. However, sample analysis results were invalidated because the sample holding times were exceeded. Ref. Nos. 1,22,24 24. What is the population within a 4-mile radius of the site? Based on the 1980 census, the population within 4 miles of the site is approximately 36,000. Ref. No. 17 "U'T 001 0079 I 02-8902-40-PA I Rev. No. 1 FIRE AND EXPLOSION 25. Describe the potential for a fire or explosion to occur with respect to the hazardous substance(s) known or suspected to be present on site. Identify the hazardous substance(s) and the method of storage or containment associated with each. No significant fire or explosion conditions are known or suspected to be present on the site. Ref. No. 1 26. What is the population within a 2-mile radius of the hazardous substance(s) at the facility? Based on the 1980 census, the population within 2 miles of the site is approximately 19,000. Ref. No. 17 DIRECT CO NT ACT/ON-SITE EXPOSURE 27. Describe the potential for direct contact with hazardous substance{s) stored in any of the waste units on site or deposited in on-site soils. Identify the hazardous substance(s) and the accessibility of the waste unit. There is little potential for direct contact with substances stored in the waste unit. Although the bungs are open on some of the drums and there are some spills, the drums are not located in an area that is frequented by customers. Access to the site is not controlled by a fence. There is potential for workers to come in contact with waste oil in the course of performing their jobs. Ref. No 1 28. How many residents live on a property whose boundaries encompass any part of an area contaminated by the site? There is no evidence that any residential areas have been contaminated by the site. Ref. No. 1 29. What is the population within a 1-mile radius of the site? Based on the 1980 census data, the population within 1 mile of the site is approximately 11,000. Ref. No. 17 TUT O01 0080 ._ - 02-8902-40-PA SC~ 1 Rev. No. 1 PART IV: SITE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Tutu Texaco is an automotive service station located in the Tutu area of St. Thomas. U.S. Virgin Islands. The primary activities at the site are gasoline sales and automotive repair and maintenance. The area within approximately 1 mile of the site is densely populated and contains some commercial properties. There are large housing developments northwest, north, and east of the site. Beyond 1 mile, there are scattered smaller villages and towns. The densely populated and highly commercial town of Charlotte Amalie is located approximately 2.5 miles west of the site. On February 15, 1989, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT conducted an on-site reconnaissance of the Tutu Texaco Site. A total of thirty-one 55-gallon drums were observed on the site. Twenty-five of the drums contain waste oil, two contain dirt, and four contain water pumped from a tank excavation. There are three 20-gallon drums and a few 5-gallon pails containing waste oil on site. In addition to the drums, there are a number of underground storage tanks below the site. An unknown number of these tank contain gasoline, and two of the tanks contain waste oil. There is evidence that the gasoline tanks are "not tight" (i.e., may be leaking - Ref. No. 23). The integrity of the waste oil storage tanks is unknown. The underground gasoline tanks and the drums containing tank excavation water are not evaluated as they are not considered to be hazardous waste under the petroleum exclusion of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act(CERCLA). Samples of waste oil from the site were reported to contain TCA. However, the sample analysis results were invalidated because the sample holding times were exceeded. The waste oil may also contain small quantities of gasoline, kerosene, and degreasing solvents. Until June 1986, the Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority (WAPA) accepted waste oil generated by marinas, airports, and auto maintenance facilities. The waste oil was blended with fuel and burned as a source of power. WAPA stopped accepting waste oil when a batch was found to contain PCBs. The source of the PCBs is unknown. Currently, there is no permitted method of waste oil disposal on St. Thomas. Generators must store their waste oil, but the facilities are not inspected or issued permits. These conditions, combined with drum shortages and poor housekeeping, have resulted in generally poor waste containment at many of the facilities. The waste oil drums on the Tutu Texaco Site are not properly stored or contained. There are oil spills visible on the ground, and oil-stained soil was observed on the Gassett Property adjacent to the drums. There are no berms to contain the oil in the event of a spill. Underground tanks for waste oil storage were described in a preliminary investigation completed by the DPNR in August of 1987. Waste oil was being stored in these tanks in violation of Virgin Islands Law. Based on the above TUT 001 O081 I I 02-8902-40-PA Rev. No: 1 I _ considerations, a recommendation of MEDIUM PRIORITY for further action is provided. Because of I the spills, stained soil, and improper waste containment, the potential exists for transport of the wastes to surface water and groundwater The owner of the Tutu Texaco Site, Texaco Caribbean Inc., has been identified as one of nine potentially responsible parties in the contamination of groundwater in the Tutu area. In July and August 1987, ERA confirmed by sampling that volatile organic compounds were present in a number of wells in the Tutu area Results of sampling conducted in October, 1987 (Ref. No. 24) show the presence of volatile organic compounds and metals in Tutu area well water. OPNR has issued orders to close 16 wells in the area. ERA removal action activities in the Tutu area included sampling of wells and cisterns, removal of contaminated water from cisterns, and supplying clean water on a regular basis to affected residents. s*\t I ^<> Locations for the collection of environmental samples at the Tutu Texaco Site are limited. The only available soil near the drum storage area is on the adjacent Gassett Motors property. A number of the wells in the vicinity of the site are known to be contaminated with volatile organic compounds. As a consequence, there may be few wells available that are useful in determining whether hazardous substances have been released from the facility. Sampling of waste sources on the site is recommended to determine whether the waste oil contains hazardous substances. Efforts should also be directed toward further definition of the population using groundwater for drinking and toward determining the volume, construction, and integrity of the underground oil storage tanks. Sampling is not recommended if ongoing or planned removal actions or enforcement actions result in the collection of samples from the site by ERA or DPNR, or by Texaco Caribbean for the aforementioned agencies. OO1 0082 ATTACHMENT A MAPS AND PHOTOS . TUT OO1 0083 02-8902-40-PA Rev NO. i TUTU TEXACO ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS CONTENTS Figure 1 : Figure 2: Exhibit A: Site Location Map Site Map Photograph Log ***• - *£S- - r- TUT 00.1 0084 02 8902-JO-PA Rev. No. 1 i5TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION VIRGIN (QUAD) EASTERN ST. THOMAS, V.I. SITE LOCATION MAP TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS FIGURE 1 NUS CORPORATION SCALE: r* 2000' TUT 001 OOG'5 02-S9C2 .40-PA Rev. No._l DIRT FILLED DRUMS 20 GLN. DRUM AREA SITE MAP TUTU TEXACO, ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS L 1 FIGURE 2 IMUS ( NOT TO SCALE ) TUT 001 0086 32-3902-.10-PA Rev. No. 1 TUTU TEXACO ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS FEBRUARY 15, 1989 - PHOTOGRAPH INDEX ALL PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN BY DIANE TRUBE Photo Number Description Time R3-P1 West side-Dirt pile 1300 R3-P2 Drums under overhang 1302 R3-P3 Tutu Texaco drum storage area. 1304 R3-P4 Tutu Texaco excavated dirt pile and pvc-pipe collection 1308 system. R3-P10 Tutu Texaco drums as seen from Gassett Motors. Note stained 1353 soil. t • """•TV TUT O01 O087 IMUS CORPORAnON :9V. JTU "IXACO R3-P1 February 15, 1989 West side-Dirt pile. 1300 TUT 001 OO8S "JTU "IXACO JCMAS. ..£. ,;RG: R3-P2 February 15, 1989 Drums under overhang. 1302 TUT OO1 OO89 . 1 "JTU "XACC •-CM-S "« O * . i . - ta.- ; i u » R3-P3 February 15, 1989 Tutu Texaco arum storage area. 1304 'TUT 001 0090 IMUS CORPORATION JTU 7IX.ACC . - . £ . . :RG:;, : R3-P4 February 15, 1989 1308 Tutu Texaco excavatea airt pile and pvc-pipe collection system. TUT 001 0091 3-ev. .3. 1 UTU TEXACO •. "HOMAS, j.i. . :RG;:J ISL R3-P10 February 15, 1989 1353 Tutu Texaco drums as seen from Gassett Motors. Note stained soil. TUT OO1 0092 ATTACHMENT B REFERENCES TUT OO1 O093 02-8902-40-PA Rev. No: 1 REFERENCES 1- Field Notebook No. 0398, US Virgin Islands Drum Reconnaissance, TOO No. 02-8902-29, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT, Edison, New Jersey, February 14 to 17, 1989. 2. U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Topographic Maps, 7.5 minute series, "Central St. Thomas, Virgin Islands and Eastern St. Thomas, Virgin Islands Quadrangles" 1955, revised 1982. 3. Gomez - Gomez, F. and J.E. Heisel. Summary Appraisals of the Nation's Groundwater Resources-Caribbean Region. Geological Survey Professional Paper 813-4, 1980. 4. Stone, R.G. Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands, Volume XIX - Part 1, Meteorology of the Virgin Islands. 1942. 5. Climate of Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands, Climatography of the United States No. 60, June 1982 v*x 't *--^v> 6. Tutu Well Site Potable Water Alternatives Report, Anna's Retreat, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. Prepared for U.S. EPA Region 2 By Region 2 Technical Assistance Team, Weston/SPER Division, December, 1989. 7. Fish and Wildlife Service List of Endangered and Theatened Wildlife and Plants. 50 CFR 17.11 and 17.12. February, 1985. 8. Telecon Note, Telephone conversation between Nancy Schlater, EPA and Diane Trube, NUS Re: Sole source aquifer in VI, March 3, 1989. 9. Graves, R.P. and R. Gonzalez. Potentiometric surface of the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer in the Tutu Area, Eastern St. Thomas, US. Virgin Islands, September 11, 1987. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resource Investigations Report 88-4131, 1988. 10. Uncontrolled hazardous waste site ranking system, A user's manual, 40 CFR, Part 300, Appendix A, 1986. 11. Donnelly, T.W., Geology of St. Thomas and St. John, US. Virgin Islands, Caribbean Geological Investigations, Geological Society of America, Memoir 98. ed. H. H. Hess, 1966. 12. Climatological Data Annual Summary, Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1987. 13. Torres - Sierra, H. and R. Dacosta, Estimated Water Use in St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, July 1983 to June 1984. Caribbean Research Institute, Technical Report No. 21. 14. U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources, Coastal Zone Management Program, zoning districts and coastal land and water use plan map. 15. Memo to Stephen D. Luftig, EPA, from Carlos O'Neill, EPA. Authorization of CERCLA Removal Action Monies for the Tutu Well Site. January 6, 1988. 16. Jordan, D.G and O.J. Cosner, A Survey of the Water Resources of St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, US Geological Survey Open File Report, 1973 TUT 001 0094 I - REFERENCES (CONT'O) I 02-8902-40-PA Rev No 1 17. Water Management Plan for the Public Water System, Prepared for the Government of the Virgin Islands by CH2M Hill. July, 1983. 18. Telecon Note: Conversation between Fernando Gomez, USGS and Rich Feinberg, NUS Corp., on 3/11/89 at 1045 hours. RE: Hydrology and ground water use in St. Thomas. 19. Telecon Note: Conversation between D. Goetz of Polycaribe and D. Trube, NUS Corp., on 3/14/89 at 1430 hours. RE: Wells and water use on St. Thomas. 20. Telecon Note: Conversation between L. Reed. DPNR, and 0. Trube, NUS Corp., on 3/3/89 at 1640 hours. RE: Permits for site on St. Thomas. 21. Record of Communication, Telephone conversation between L. Reed, DPNR, and A. Brochu, U.S. EPA Region 2, on 1/30/89 at 1400 hours. 22. Memo from L. Reed, DPNR, to Texaco file, RE: Texaco Violations, August 5, 1987. 23. Records of Petro Site tests performed on Tutu Texaco Service Station underground tanks Nos. 1 and 3, by J.F. Martinex and Cia., Inc. on July 18 and July 11, 1987, respectively. 24. Memo from Arnold Martinez, TAT II, to Carlos O'Neill, U.S. EPA Caribbean Office. January 27, 1988. Subject: Tutu Area sampling results. TUT O01 OO95 I fc ff 30) Ir i i REFERENCE NO. 22 TUT 001 O096 . -PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF TEXACO VIOLATIONS DATE: 05 AUG. "87 . TO: TEXACO's FILE ' FROM: LEONARD REED SUBJECT: TEXACO's VIOLATIONS [waste oil, etc.) On 05 August 1987 at about 07:45 hrs. an inspection was conducted of the Texaco Tutu facility located at ?? Anna's Retreat. Mr. Vernon Morgan was contacted for information relative to the inspection. The inspection revealed that there were several violations of V.I. Laws/Regulations. The findings are as follows: 1. A large underground container with concrete top that is ' part of the entire surface area was on site. This container had a concrete partition that may have holes towards the bottom since the material contained therein was of the exact height in both compartments. The container was protected with a circular cast iron cover. The material contained appeared to be waste oil. It was not possible to determine the construction of the subsurface tank to include depth, width, length, type of bottom [concrete, dirt, etc.1. Waste oil is classified as a hazardous waste in 19 R&R ch. 56 sec. 1560-500. Said waste oil was generated in violation of 19 R&R sec. 1560-501. Said waste oil was also stored in the above tank in violation of sec. 1560-501. 2. There were there (3) service areas, each equipped with hydraulic hoist and waste oil collection trap that had pipes installed to transfer the waste to one (1) or more of the waste oil storage tanks. Each of the three (3) traps contained waste petroleum products in violation of 1560-501. 3. There was a filled septic tank on the property that will be in violation of 19 R&R sec. 1404-73 if further investigations revealed that there is public sewer available. 4. The soil of the unpaved area along the northern boundary was saturated with waste petroleum products. There were several containers of petroleum products stored in said area along with automotive parts all in violation of 1560-501. The auto tires contained in the above accumulation are capable of breeding mosquitoes in violation of 19 VIC section 1563 (5). TUT 001 O097 TEXACO1s VIOLATIONS 05 AUG. "87 continued __ 5—-There was a large distinctly circular area with a square steel plate cover that was also filled with waste oil. It was not possible to determine the length, depth, width, type of bottom [concrete, soil, etc.]. Said waste oil was generated and stored in violation of 1560-501. 6. The storm drain contained waste oil or similar petroleum products in violation of 19 VIC section 1563 (13) and 19 R&R section 1560-2 (j). 7. There were two additional man holes covered with square steel covers. It was not possible to determine the contents of said man holes due to the rear wheels of the most north of three (3) (semi trailers being on the said covers. These are suspect of containing petroleum products since the cistern and the septic tank were identified. FOLLOW UP IS NEEDED! TUT 001 00Vb I I I I i • REFERENCE NO. 5 I I I I I I I I I I I TUT OOi OO99 I I \, i I, I I L.U.S.T. LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SURVEY ST. THOMAS, ST. JOHN AND ST. CROIX U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS 'l. BY WERNER WERNICKE, P.E. AND ALICE SEYMOUR • - DONALD L. HAMLIN I CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. i P.O. BOX 5202 | . ST. THOMAS, VIRGIN ISLANDS 00801 ' FEBRUARY, 1986 This study was supported by the Government of the Virgin ( Islands Department of Conservation and Cultural Affairs, Division of Natural Resources Management under Contract No, - - - PC-CCS-22-86. TUT 001 OiOO I Ir TABLE OF CONTENTS I SECTION PAGE | 1.00 INTRODUCTION 1 2.00 CONCLUSION 1 |. 3.00 UNDERGROUND TANK SURVEY 2 4.00 SOILS/GEOLOGY 4 ! 5.00 GENERAL OPERATING 5 PROCEDURE ! 6.00 GROUND WATER INVESTIGATIONS S 7.00 DISCUSSION 6 REFERENCES 8 LIST OF TABLES AND 9 FIGURES APPENDIX I I I I TUT OOi 0101 . 1 - ff 1.00 INTRODUCTION Many petroleum products, and other chemicals, are stored in below ground tanks which can corrode, leaking toxic products into the underground environment. In order to evaluate the 'occurance of such events the V.I. Department of Conservation and Cultural Affairs contracted with Donald L. Ham1in Consulting Engineers, Inc. to perform a survey of eleven gasoline service stations in the Virgin Islands ( Leaking Underground Storage Tanks - L.U.S.T. Contract No. PC-CCA-22-86). Information on underground storage tanks was obtained through visits to the facilities, interviewing persons having specific information about the facilities as well as mailing questionnaires to knowledge- able individuals. 2.00 CONCLUSIONS * Ten gasoline retail outlets ( and one bulk plant ) were surveyed of the approximate 50 service stations on the islands. Since all stations were not sampled, a degree of uncertainty exists as to the conditions at the other locations where pertroleum products or hazardous substances are stored in underground tanks. The information was provided on a purely voluntary basis, and it would be reasonable to assume that a station operator with a serious tank leakage problem, either presently or in the past, may be reluctant to provide such information. Consequently the information obtained during this survey may have a built in bias. The finding of the interviews indicates that leaks do occur, which are apparently terminated fairly rapidly once they are discovered by taking the tank out of service. How much petroleum product does leak into the ground is not clear, nor was it possible to determine its effect on ground water supplies in the area. Stations which carry the large company brand names, such as Texaco, Esso, etc., have their tanks installed by those companies, which also replace any leaking tanks. Thus tank replacement occurs fairly rapidly once a leaking tank is confirmed. The independent stations, i.e., those not carrying the larger oil company brand names, maintain, install or replace their own tanks. Only one independent operator was surveyed on St. Thomas and none of his tanks had been or were leaking. Thus, in the case of independent service stations, it is unclear as to how rapidly damaged tanks are replaced or the volume of product lost into the ground. TUT 001 0102 - 2 - In all cases, some product is lost when a tank begins to leak. The volume of fluid lost depends on several factors such as size of the leaking hole, tank size,and content level, among other factors. The cummulative effects of many such small leaks on the water quality of an aquifer is not clear. Comprehensive testing of ground water would be needed to establish a linkage. The limited groundwater testing which has been carried out does indicate the presence of toxic or petroleum substances at some locations. Most of the owner/operators of service stations interviewed had very little knowledge of the below ground facilities. Although this greatly increased the level of effort needed to get information, it did not appear to have any bearing on the leakage of tanks. A simple test is used on as regular basis to determine if tank contents are lost. Whether such testing method is adequate from a standpoint of protecting groundwater supplies or the environment in general is not certain. Corrosion protection is not uniform for steel tanks, and corrosion and failure of such tanks does occur. Effective corrosion protection of steel tanks for their operating life will provide an effective method- to prevent the release of toxic substances into groundwater supplies and the general environment. 3.00 UNDERGROUND TANK SURVEY 3.10 INTERVIEWS The investigation into the potential for leaking underground storage tanks (L.U.S.T.) involved obtaining specific information on the history of installed underground tanks from owner/managers of automotive service stations ( one bulk facility was included). In complying with the conditions of the contract, a total of eleven sites were selected on the three main islands, five on St. Thomas , five on St. Croix and one on St. John. Most of the sites were chosen from areas where ground water exists and is utilized for human consumption. In the event of a leaking tank, the contents would likely find its way into the ground water supply. Such an event could adversely affect the water quality. Owner/managers of service stations on St. Thomas, St.Croix and St. John were contacted by telephone and interviews were scheduled. Questionnaires were developed for use during the interviews to obtain consistent information ( see Appendix). For three stations on St. Croix the interview forms / questionnaires were mailed. All efforts were made to interview owners or managers to obtain as complete information as possible. The questionnaire was set up TUT 001 O1O3 - 3 - to obtain information on storage tank age, size, content and construction material as well as other information relevant to this survev. Service stations interviewed included subsidiaries of Esso and Texaco fuel suppliers. One independent operator was interviews on St. Thomas. 3.20 ST. THOMAS A total of six (6) service stations were contacted by telephone on St. Thomas, five (5) agreed to an interview and appointments were scheduled. The process of schedulincr the interviews was very Lime consuming. Interviews had to be rescheduled a number of times or interviewers waited at the station because of the absence of service station owner/managers. Due to their lack of knowledge, service station owner/managers had difficulty answerina the followina questions on the Questionnaire: 15 Deoth below ground 16 Construction material of tanks 17 How long have tanks been installed This information was eventually provided bv Texaco and Esso Bulk Plant manaaers. The results of the survey are found on Table 1. See Figure 1 and 2 for the locaton of the service stations. 3.30 ST. JOHN One service station was contacted bv telephone and an interview scheduled. The station owner was verv cooperative, however, he had difficultv answerina the followina: 15 Depth below ground §6 Construction material These questions were eventualIv provided by the Texaco Bulk Plant manaaer. The results of the survev are found on Table 2. See Figure 3 for the location of the service station. 3.30 ST. CROIX The survey task on St. Croix became an exercise in frustration. Over a dozen service stations were contacted by telephone requesting interviews with manaaers or operators. Some aareed to be interviewed only to cancel later. The most freauent response was that the distributor (bulk plant) should be contacted for the desired information. Two interviews were carried out and onlv in one case could all the required information be supplied (airport fuel facilitv). At the other site only limited information was TUT 001 0104 I - 4 - I available and the distributor (Esso) provided the needed details. A parallel effort was carried out by sending the questionnaires to the Texaco distributor requesting completion of the questionnair and return to our office. Such information could not be provided by telephone (or interviews) as its release had to be approved by the San Juan main office. Survey information on three additional sites was obtained in this manner. It took three months for the information to be returned to our office. See Table 3 for the summary of the survey and Figures 4 through 7 for the locations. 4.00 SOILS/GEOLOGY This survey of fuel facilities was centered as much as possible in areas where ground water aquifers are utilized for public water supplies, namely central St. Croix and the eastern section of St.Thomas (Jordan, 1975; Jordan, 1973; Geraghty-Miller, 1983). The geology of an area is one of the major factors which determines the extent and characteristics of aa aquifer. Deep soils or sedimentary formations are generally favorable for significant aquifers. Likewise, the presence of such soil/geology formations, at least in the upper 10 feet, is favorable for the installation of underground fuel tanks. Excavation into rock is costly and locations with deep soils are prefered. On St. Thomas, four of the five sites surveyed are located in the Tutu watershed basin and the Bovoni area. Both areas contain aquifers from which public water supplies are withdrawn. The Tutu basin contains the largest and most heavily utilized aquifer on St. Thomas. On St. Croix, most of the stations surveyed are likewise located over the island's extensive central plain aquifers. On St. John significant aquifers are not found in the Cruz Bay area (Cosner, 1972). The soils which exist at the survey sites are shown on Table 4. The depth of soil at the Tutu basin (Anna's Retreat) sites on St. Thomas ranges from 20 to 40 feet (Jordan, 1973). The depth to rock at the other sites is likewise sufficient for tank installations. Hydrologic conditions during the wetter parts of the year will bring the water table in proximity of underground tanks. The bottom of buried tanks will usually be 8 to 10 feet below the surface. This has two implications. 1. Leaking contents have short pathways to aqifers and TUT OO1 O105 - 5 - 2. the moisture will promote accelerated corrosion of steel tanks. 5.00 GENERAL OPERATING PROCEDURE This section gives a brief discussion on the general procedures used at service stations to check on fuel loss through leakage or other causes. Underground storage tanks for gasoline or diesel fuel are normally owned by the parent oil company. It is the oil company's responsibility to maintain these tanks. However, it is to the station operators advantage to properly monitor these tanks on a regular basis to check for loss due to leakage or theft or for intrusion of water. The time elements may vary but in general it will this pattern daily. Each pump has a master meter which keeps a running total of every gallon pumped. This meter is read dally at start or close of business and checked against register tapes. On a weekly or daily schedule* the operator will dip his tanks with a, properly calibrated stick. This tells but how much is in each tank and this will be compared to the Meter readings. Every second or third week he will usually add water detecting paste to the lower 6" of the stick to check for water. A representative from the parent oil company normally calls on all his stations once a month. At this time he will stick all the tanks. He then checks his reading against his record for the previous month, deliveries of fuel during the month and past and present meter readings. If these figures do not balance out the oil company resentative will usually call the station on a weekly basis for a time and the tanks are monitored closely to determine if they have a leak, a dishonest employee, .or in a rare case, a faulty master meter. Once a leak is suspected the tank level monitoring effort increases. If a leak is confirmed, the tank is taken out of service and replaced. 6.00 GROUND WATER INVESTIGATIONS A survey of ground water conditions was carried out in the U.S. Virgin Islands during 1982 by the firm of Geraghty and Miller, Inc., (1983). The quantitative and qualitative characteristics of a number of wells were determined. Pentane and barium, both chemicals associated with refinery operations, were detected in water from the Barren Spot wells at St. Croix's central plain aquifer. The report further indicates that hydrocarbons, principally from leaded TUT 001 0106 - 6 - I ^_ gasoline, were detected in a significant area within the Hess Oil refinery boundaries. Organic solvents were found in well water samples from the I V.I. Housing Authority well in the Tutu, St. Thomas area. Sources of such organic solvents include many light industrial processes, dry cleaning operations and ( mechanical repair shops which utilize such solvents and chemicals in their operations. Such chemicals may also be used in household products and could be introduced into the , ground water supply through septic tank and leaching fields (Geraghty, Miller 1983). A reconnaissance of ground-water quality in the Virgin I Islands was carried out in 1984 by the U.S. Geological I Survey in cooperation with the College of the Virgin Islands (Garcia, 1984). Nineteen wells were sampled throughout the , islands. The survey did not find any abnormal concentrations • ~ of the chemicals tested for which included common ions, trace elements, priority pollutants, purgeable organic, .' base-neutral, and acid extractable compounds, as well as j organochloride insecticides, polychlorinated biphenols and • polychlorinated naphthalenes. Pentane, which was found predominant in the Geraghty-Miller survery, was however not tested for. --— On the basis of the findings by Geraghty-Miller (1983), sources of hydrocarbon pollution of the ground water supply are present and pose a threat to the public water supply. 7.00 DISCUSSION A number of findings were made based on the survey. i 1. Leakage of tanks does occur and tanks are either repaired or replaced within a short time . 2. The gas station operators/owners had generally little knowledge about installation details of the tanks. 3. No apparent standard is used to minnimize corrosion of steel tanks. At all stations surveyed, the method used to detect leaks is fairly consistent and timely. Each fuel tank is dipped once or twice daily to determine the fluid level and the presence I of any water in the tank, adjustments are made for fuel added or pumped out during that period. If discrepancies are noted, the frequency of tank dipping increases. If a leak is determined to be the cause, the fuel in the tank is I used up. The empty tank is sealed, removed or otherwise I taken out of service. I During the time the tank is emptied by sale of the contents ^^during the normal operations, the tank continues to leak. The severity of such a leak would depend on a number of TUT O01 0107 I I - 7 - factors, such as the size of the leaking hole, the tank content level, the tank size, the presence or absence of ground water and other factors. Of course, prior to discovery of a leak, some of the contents will have been absorbed by the surrounding soil. Thus some loss of contents accompanies all situations where tanks leak. The survey revealed that gas station owners/operators had generally little knowledge of the tank installation details. In most cases the suppliers (bulk plants) had to be called upon for specific information. The result was that much time was spent: in attemting to locate the persons who had the needed information. In other instances owners/operators refused to provide any information. The reasons for such refusal were not clear. The survey effort on St. Thomas/St. John preceded on a reasonable basis once cooperating individuals were identified. On St. Croix, however, with one exception, the survey proved to be' time consuming task and at times frustating. Only through the intervention of Ms. Dinah Johnson of the Division of Natural Resources (DCCA) was the information finally provided. Host of the tanks involved in the survey are constructed of steel. Some are coated with corrosion inhibiting material while others are not. It cannot be conclusively determined, based on the interviews, as to how severe the corrosion problem is. Too many unknowns are involved, not the least of which is the probable bias in the sampling. It is possible that the owner/operators who failed to cooperate had a history of leaking tanks. Location, depth to ground water and soils, among other factors, would certainly influence corrosion attack of the metal. TUT 001 0108 I I I i: r I I I I - 8 - REFERENCES Garcia, R., and Canoy, M., "Reconnaissance of Ground-Water Quality in the U.S. Virgin Islands," July 1984, U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Open-File Data Report 84-807, prepared in cooperation with the College of the Virgin Islands, July, 1984. Geraghty & Miller, Inc., "Report on Current Ground-Water Conditions in the U.S. Virgin Islands," prepared for the V.I. Department of Conservation and Cultural Affairs, April 1983. Rivera, L.H., et al., "Soil Survey-Virgin Islands of the United States," U.S. Soil Conservation Publication, 1971. Jordan, D.G., "A Survey of the Water Resources of St. Croix, Virgin Islands," U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 1975. Jordan D.G., and Cosner O.J., "A Survey of the Hater Resources of St. Thomas, Virgin Islands," U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 197.3. Cosner O.J., "Water in St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands,* U.S. Geoloaical Survey Open-File Report, 1972. TJT O01 0109 A- f U L. TABLE 1. SUMMARY INFORMATION LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SURVEY ST. THOMAS V.I. 'STATION INTERVIEWED NUMBER OF TANKS SIZE OF TANKS (GALLONS) TANK CONTENTS DEPTH BELOW GROUND (FEET) CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL LEAKS YEARS SINCE INSTALLED ' 11 2 (A) 5,000 (B) 5,000 : (A) LEADED, 'Ii (B) UNLEADED 2 to 3 ALL STEEL (A) NO (B) NO U) DON'T KNOW # 2 2 (A) 6,000 (B) 6,000 (A) LEADED (B) UNLEADED 2 to 3 ALL STEEL (A) ~ NO (B) NO (A) 11 YEARS (B) 10 YEARS t 3 / _ ^' 3 (A) 4,000 (B) 4,000 (0 4,000 (A) JNLEADED (B) JN LEADED (C) LEADED 2 to 3 ALL STEEL (A) YES (B) NO (C) NO (A) L6 YEARS (B) 16 YEARS ' (C) 16 YEARS f 4 3 (A) 6,000 (B) 6,000 (C) 2,500 (A) LEADED (B) UNLEADED (C) OIL 4 ALL STEEL (A) NO (B) NO (0 NO (A)' 16 YEARS (B) 16 YEARS (C) 16YEARS » 5 3 (A) 6,000 (B) 8,000 (0 6,000 (A) UNLEADED (B) LEADED (C) UNLEADED 1+10 in. ALL STEEL • (A) NO (B) NO (0 NO (A) 5 YEARS (B) 5 YEARS (C) 5 YEARS See Figure 152 for Numerical Identification TUT 001 OHO Table 4 Geology/SolIs Gas Station and Location Esso Tutu (Anna's Retreat) St. Thomas See Figure 1 Rodriquef Auto Parts (Esso) Anna's Retreat St. Thomas See Figure 1 Tutu Texaco Anna's Retreat St. Thomas See Figure 1 Bovoni Texaco fiovoni, "- St. Thomas See Figure 1 Gotllieb's Quickway (Esso) Contant (Crown Bay Fill) St. Thomas See Figure 2 Texaco, Cruz Bay St. John See Figure 3 Eastern Carib- bean Airways, Alexander Hamilton Air- port, St. Croix See Figure 4 Sion Farm Esso, Castle Coakley, St. Croix See Figure 5 Soil Type (LaB), Lavallee Gravelly clay loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes (LaB), Lavallee Gravelly clay loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes (GyB), Glynn clay loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes (SaA), San Anton clay loaa, 0 to 3 percent slopes (Ma) Made sand dredged from harbor (PbC) Parasol clay loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes (AgB), Aguilita gravelly clay loam, 2-5 per- cent slope (ScB), sion Clay loam 0-5 percent slopes Depth to Rock (ft) 20-40 Seasonal high water table <ft) 10 + 20-40 10 20-40 10 + 2 (soft lime stone) 10+ 2 (soft lime stone) 10+ TUT 001 0111 -II- .••v ."\ it i. :\: •s><i>L~i'. vTN«Y«;" ' - — •>r''2£* ^& mi "\; c/' " * 24000ft FIGURE 1. UNDERGROUND TANK SURVEY LOCATION ESTATE TUTU 5 BOVONJ ST. THOMAS, V.J. TUT 001 OH-'' • - • • SERVICE STATION ff 3 I ' ' UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INVENTORY ,^* I OUESTTOXATBF I A. Date; Deretnh^r 1 ?, 1985 Person Interviewed: Mr. Vernon Morgan____ Position: Owner ' B. Location of Facility: TUTU TEXACO Estate Anna's Retreat I at. Thomas. V.I. 2. Kimber of Storage Tanks: 3 3. Size of Tanks: ( Gallons) fi) 4 rnnn (2) 4.onn f3) 4.000 (4). 4. Contents of Tanks: Gasoline ( 1 1 l-+*A*A ( 2 ) Hn1^aH>.^ ( 3 1 Unleaded ( 4 ). 5. Depth below ground: (O. 6. Construction Materials: fl) Steel f2-) Steel f3^ Steel 7. How long have tanks been installed: ( 1 )__]_l_jitaxs_ f 2) 1 1 year* (3) 11 years (4). 8. Have there been problems with leaks: Mn f2) No f3^ No (4). Specif/: A TeaV ncrured between two tanks in 198S T^T•»r•n yepaired the problem in three weeks Interviewer Louise Penn TUT OO1 Oil: I I I I REFERENCE NO. 6 I I Ir I I I I I I TUT OO1 Oil4 MEMORANDUM CAMP tsRESSER & McKEE INC. TO: Qr.raL FROM: »"tt PROJECT: SUBJECT: .T^. r .^.^ \ ^ CM DATE: L\r, dor iffior^ (OM/e. Tutu TUT 001 vy H * V' I f-T"f o X* o <D B 1 J «^i V ^ * •* * * * % _ _M»l ———J, | „, Mmmmmm M •^•tf -* T -V V » '.» Tl r li, I' I ii •' — •——-————- TUT 001 0117 CO A: t.i * -r o,i ~V.1 *t \ i o •^r r- o i i VST-.V-'iE?'it .^ 19 xJ }• •• * o •*• -c; 0 •5 -^ 3 o *L-i)c_-r..«u i 4 ? xo A? §i S v jg X B H • * rk tt, •o LO * » I I*f. Hi * />/* Y 1 — I'./Ji o*v &*/A TUT 001 0120 r-0 L I i ON : ^ *$? r i s ,: | I '•J g 00 [ i I I REFERENCE NO. 7 I I L I I I I I I I TUT 001 0122 FIELD NOTES 104(e) SAMPLING NOTES TUTU VELLFIELD AREA ST. TBOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Prepared for U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Vaste Programs Enforcement Washington, D.C. 20460 EPA Work Assignment No. EPA Region Site No. Contract No. COM Federal Programs Corporation Document No. Prepared By Vork Assignment Project Manager Telephone Number Primary Contact Telephone Number Date Prepared : 821 : II : 2P2G : 68-01-7331 : T821-C02-RT-DAVK-1 : CDM Federal Programs Corporation : Scott Graber : (212) 393-9634 : Caroline Kvan : (212) 264-0151 : March 16, 1989 (VP11/29) TUT 00 i Oi: ,'•*:#$&* •pi 1:8 MSTANC81 HK)M MOt,»TAmS fg*. ™OM jgg*%^f Ml Ml* jmmq WISH. MM i ftfl MWl OMOtKt 7 • if 4 rtM) HA ttw «M***•€* «rrur' MC* Wt frM BM ^ JUOPV VMM (Ml) ttttf Ct toft* AIM iMMilV tl MMr **Cvt •? jZ^FPjTJ^^^^i^™^ »•»» fll" Mil MMtf *1 fMI lV>/f MI) vlMoMCt On IWk» "^3^4,- * 0i 2 345 6 78 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 0 .1 7 4 .4 5 .6 .7 J .9 MstMCt out from Side or SrauMor Steko 0.0 15 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0 10.5 12.0 15.0 16.5 110 19.5 21.0 22.5 24.0 255 27.0 215 30.0 315 33.0 •345 36.0 37.5 39.0 405 42.0 435 45.0 415 410 495 51.0 525 54.0 555 57.0 585 60.0 07 1.7 3.2 4.7 6.2 7.7 9.2 10.7 127 13.7 15.2 16.7 112 19.7 217 22.7 24.2 25.7 277 217 307 31.7 337 34.7 367 37.7 397 40.7 427 43.7 457 46.7 412 49.7 517 52.7 547 55.7 577 58.7 60.2 04 1.8 34 4.8 6.3 7.8 9.3 10.8 124 13.8 118 113 19.8 21.3 22.8 244 25.8 274 28J 304 31J 334 34.8 364 37.8 39.3 40.8 424 43.8 454 46.8 413 49.8 514 52.8 544 55.8 574 58.8 604 0.5 2.0 34 5.0 6.5 8.0 95 11.0 12.5 14.0 155 17.0 18.5 20.0 215 23.0 245 26.0 275 29.0 305 32.0 33.5 35.0 365 38.0 395 41.0 42.5 44.0 45.5 47.0 485 50.0 51.5 53.0 545 56.0 575 59.0 60.5 0.6 2.1 3.6 5.1 6.6 8.1 9.6 11.1 12.6 14.1 15.6 17.1 18.6 20.1 21.6 23.1 24.6 26.1 27.6 29.1 §0.6 32.1 33.6 35.1 36.6 38.1 39.6 41.1 42.6 44.1 45.6 47.1 48.6 50.1 51.6 53.1 54.6 56.1 57.6 59.1 60.6 0.8 24 3.8 5.3 6.8 8.3 9.1 114 12.8 144 15.8 17.3 18.8 20.3 21.8 234 24.8 264 27.8. 294 30.8 324 33.8 354 36.8 384 39.8 41.3 42J 44.3 45J 474 418 504 51.8 534 54J 513 57J 594 60.8 0.9 2.4 3.9 5.4 6.9 8.4 9.9 11.4 12.9 14.4 15.9 17.4 18.9 20.4 21.9 23.4 24.9 26.4 27.9 29.4 30.9 32.4 33.9 35.4 36.9 314 39.9 41.4 42.9 44.4 45.9 47.4 419 50.4 51.9 53.4 54.9 56.4 57.9 59.4 60.9 1.1a 5.6 7.1 16 10.1 11.6 13.1 14.6 17.6 19.1 20.6 22.1 235 25.1 216 211 29.6 31.1 32.6 34.1 35.6 37.1 38.6 40.1 41.6 43.1 44.6 46.1 47.6 49.1 50.6 52.1 53.6 55.1 56.6 58.1 59.6 61.1 17 5.7 77 17 107 11.7 13.2 14.7 167 17.7 197 20.7 227 23.7 25.2 217 287 29.7 317 32.7 347 35.7 377 317 407 41.7 437 44.7 412 47.7 497 50.7 527 53.7 557 517 512 59.7 617 1.4a 5.1 7.4 19 10.4 11.9 13.4 14.9 114 17.9 19.4 20.9 22.4 23.9 25.4 26.9 214 29.9 31.4 32.9 34.4 35.9 37.4 38.9 40.4 41.9 43.4 44.9 414 47J 49.4 50.9 52.4 53.9 55.4 519 58.4 59.9 61.4 Si 0i 234 56 78 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 31 39 40 •I }'.l ' •" 4 Tm poptr hi tMs book it jL' ' '' modi of 100% big trodo rag stock with • WATER RG9STINQ surfKO sbinf. \ KEUFFEL 4 ESSER CO. ;i ' "• KEUFFEL ft ESSEN CO. For Curve Table* too Mid of boot, I -iC H- f-0 9STO TOO 1 ——— —————— 1 ——— —— i —— i —— i —— i —— ! —— i —— 1 v4 i ' 'a^ t- II «a /» T i F . 1 f «S — O Nj ta fit (v» J ^-.^ '<? -itk cS. rNfi.. >lu!.f; nt? »5-< J $-fcL, H ?Jt a> I**./ Ji ;? C A 7*» «>& afiMk U.1J *»w ftt TUT 001 0128 c-t oot- !-Lw <i (A. 'Ait or sm • w tt a O H>w TUT 001 0132 ££TO TOO mi Q £i H- £, H--w TUT OO1 O135 ^xji^bJ /i?-ft r^rrciB ^ p^ro ^j<K-^*» ^EH <^^>^j ^jV*r« Sff^Bt j> "b^r ^]eo^i^ ^^'"^IF |<6^ CtoLtC/ 9yA j^ ujrjy*^ <#*rt ''. fvfT* *^sk> *** txr^sKpp ~JV 1 '° v / wr&?' ^ ^^f. '^^—^^\\j^s^ ~ty *h r*^?^^ v -^•TH^v •-0 Ki T~too (- ID ^r V " ^ ajp^"1**^ 'tyyjk" TUT OO1 0137 TUT 001 013 8 TUT 001 0140 TOO mi -^5,w v^i TUT 001 0143 = TUT 001 0144 TOO -_ ->— _ * — — 9irTO TOO IHl u-£>^j TUT 001 0147 TUT 00.1 0148 TOO ini OS TO T00 I I "I I I 8 'ON 30N3H3J3H I I I I J I I C O M F E D E R A L P R O G R A M S C O R P O R A T I O N April 27, 1990 Ms. Caroline Kwan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10278 Project: EPA Contract No: 68-tf 9-0002 Vork Assignment: C02048 - Tutu Veil Field Document No: TES 5 - C02048 - EP - BQBF Subject: Preliminary (unvalidated) CLP Sample .,x Analysis Data Summary of Soils and Vaters ^J from the Tutu Texaco Soil Pile, Tutu Esso Tank Excavation Pit and Soil Pile, and Second Round 104(e) Letter Response Sampling, Tutu Vellfield and Supercat Areas, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands Dear Ms. Kvan, The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the preliminary CLP analysis results from the sampling activities of the week of June 5-10, 1989, in the Tutu and Supercat Areas, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands. Vhile this data has been through our in-house validation process, FPC is awaiting validation by MMB before officially releasing the data. When we receive that validation we will submit separate formal data summaries to you for the Tutu Well Field and Supercat Laundromat areas. The samples analyzed consist of: Case 12058 - soils and aqueous samples - volatile organ! cs (VOAS), extractables (semi-VOAs - base/neutral/acids, pesticides, and pcbs) Case 4512b - soils and aqueous samples - total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) Case 4658b - soils and aqueous samples - EP toxicity Summary tables of these analyses are included as attachments to this report. Splits of PRP samples were accepted by FPC during the following oversight activities: Texaco soil pile sampling (following soil pile ventilation) Esso tank excavation (from pit following tank removal activities) Esso soil pile sampling (excavated soil prior to ventilation). 40 Rector Street. 10th Floor New York. NY 10006 212393-9634 OO1 0151 CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION FPC samples from 10A(e) Letter Response sites were collected from: Texaco Tutu Station Esso Tutu Car Care Station 0'Henry Dry Cleaners Department of Education Building (formerly LAGA) Ramsay Motor Company Supercat Site (locations not differentiated in this report) The 104(e) Letter Response site sampling represents a second investigation. These, and additional sites, were originally sampled in the summer of 1988. Copies of the Sample Analysis Data Summaries submitted for 1988 sampling and 1989 analysis of oils from 104(e) letter response sites are included as attachments with this report for easy reference. A master table of locations split samples accepted by FPC during field oversight activities is included vith the data tables. It lists the PRP field number, FPC field numbers, CLP sample numbers and analyses performed. The data tables list only analytes found above detection limits. We have included data qualified as estimated (J), tentatively identified (NJ), estimated and found in blanks (BJ). Analytes qualified as below detection limits (U) or estimated belov detection limits (UJ) were not included. Values that were rejected during the validation process due to problems vith laboratory instrument calibration are listed as rejected (R) vith no value. Analyses from field blanks and trip blanks are presented vith the data from each site to indicate vhich analytes may have been present due to sampling or laboratory contamination. Brief summaries of the analytical results from each site are presented belov. Texaco Soil Pile - Splits from the ventilated soils avaiting disposal at the Texaco site are relatively clean. VOAs vere collected from the top, middle and bottom of the pile at each location. All other analyses vere performed on homogenized (top/middle/bottom) samples. The main VGA found vas methylene chloride, vhich vas also found in a lab blank. Sample FSP2-022 from the middle of Texaco's location SP-3 contained chlorinated Lhydrocarbons and xylenes. Tentatively identified hydrocarbons vere also found in semivolatile analyses from this location. No pesticides or PCBs vere detected. TPH at the three locations split with FPC ranges from <10 ug/g (ppm) to 91 ug/g. The only metals detected by EP Toxicity analysis vere cadmium and lead. Cadmium ranged from .35 to 2.8 ug/1; lead ranged from 1.8 to 31 ug/1. Esso Excavation Pit - FPC accepted splits from 7 of the 13 locations sampled by Esso. Of the VOAs detected, xylene and ethylbenzene vere the most common, being present in all but one sample. Benzene vas detected in four samples, toluene in tvo. The highest concentrations - 311,000 ug/kg (ppb) - of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) vere found in sample TE-X-03. Various benzenes vere tentatively identified in most samples. No chlorinated hydrocarbons vere identified except 8 ug/kg (ppb) -2- — <£•£ TUT 001 01*2 I r i CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION chlorobenzene in sample TE-X-05. Semivolatiles detected included naphthaline, methylnapthalenes, fluorene, phenathrene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, and benzene isomers, most of vhich vere found in five of the samples. No pesticides or PCBs vere detected. TPH in the pit soils ranged from <10 to 69 ug/g (ppm) in all but location TE-X-03, vhich contained 2550 ug/g. Barium, cadmium and lead vere detected in almost all the samples. Esso Soil Pile - FPC accepted splits from 3 of 7 locations. VOAs vere collected from the top, middle end bottom of the pile at each location. All other analyses vere performed on homogenized (top/middle/bottom) samples. Contaminants found vere similar to those found in the excavation pit. High values for xylenes and ethylbenzene vere found in all but one sample. Toluene vas detected in tvo samples. Tentatively identified compounds in all samples include abundant hydrocarbons and benzenes. Semivolatiles detected in all samples include naphthalene, methylnaphthalenes, fluorene, phenathrene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthlate, and benzene isomers. No pesticides or PCBs vere detected. TPH ranged from 48 to 139 ug/g (ppm). ^Barium, cadmium, and lead vere detected in all samples and arsenic vas detected in one. 0'Henry Dry Cleaners - Three samples vere collected at the site. Chlorinated hydrocarbons vere the prinipal VOAs found. Sample e02-02 contained the highest values (20 ug/kg [ppb] 1,2-dichloroethene (DCEJ, 75 ug/kg trichloroethene ITCE] and 180,000 ug/kg tetrachloroethene [PCE]). Semivolatiles detected include phenol, heptadecane and bis(2- «thylhexyl)phthalate. No pesticides or PCBs vere found. TPH ranged from 38 ug/g (ppm) to 302 ug/g. Cadmium vas the only metal detected; it vas present in amounts less than 1 ug/1. -i/v pP riDepartment of Education (LAGA) - Five (4 soil and 1 vater) samples vere I x-^vV collected. Toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes vere detected in sample c^v W -—eL-02-01S. Xylenes vere also detected in eL-02-02S. Heptanes vere *' ,j?f >• tentatively identified in the vater sample. Most of the Semivolatiles ' found vere also in sample eL-02-01S. They include phenol, methylphenols, i^" naphthalene, methylnaphthalenes and other hydrocarbons. The only pesticide detected vas Endosulfan I, also in sample eL-02-01S. TPH ranged from 544 to 3470 ug/g (ppm). Cadmium and lead vere detected in all samples. Ramsay Motor Company - One soil sample vas collected. Meythylene chloride, xylenes and tentatively identified benzenes vere detected in the VOA analysis. Semivolatiles detected included naphthalene, methylnaphthalene, fluorene, fluoranthene, pyrene, and benzofluorahthenes. No pesticides or PCBs vere found. TPH vas 23,400 ug/g (ppm). Cadmium and-lead vere detected at 6.1 and 15 ug/1, respectively. Supercat Area - Eight samples (six soil and 2 vater) ver« collected from the area. The discussion of individual locations at the Supercat site vill be more detailed in the official data summary FPC submits after ve receive MHB data validation. VOAs found in most samples vere acetone and methylene chloride (possibly laboratory contaminants). Benzene, methylpentanone and ethylbenzene vere detected in soil sample eSC-02-06S, as vere tentatively identified hydrocarbons. Ethylbenzenes and tentatively identified compounds vere found in eSC-02-05S; xylene vas found in samples eSC-02-Ola -3- c- iffi OOl O153 COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION I ^_ and -04S. It should be noted that the trip blank accompanying the aqueous I samples yielded high BTEX values. The Supercat samples contained fev semivolatiles, except for sample eSC-02-04S, which had di-n-butylphthalate, butyl benzylphthalate, aliphatic hydrocarbons and sulfur. The only I pesticides detected were in sample eSC-02-06S, which contained 55 ug/kg ' (ppb) 4,4'-ODD. TPB in soils ranged from <10 to 24,500 ug/g (ppm) in eSC-02-06S and from <1 to 2 mg/1 in waters. Lead, ranging from 1.4 to 978 | ug/1 was found in all samples. Barium and cadmium were also detected in ! most samples. This completes all of the sampling activities and receipt of the corresponding split sample analytical data for the Tutu Veil Field site (Supercat Laundromat site included) to date. If you have any comments or questions regarding this data, please contact Sally Odland or me at (212) 393-9634. Sincerely, COM Federal Programs Corporation Scott B. Grai TES V Regional Manager SG/sko -4- "UT OO1 0154 LETTER REPORT PRELIMINARY (UNVALIDATED CLP SAMPLE ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY OF SOILS AND WATER FROM THE TUTU TEXACO SOIL PILE, TUTU ESSO TANK EXCAVATION PIT AND SOIL PILE, AND SECOND ROUND 104(E) LETTER RESPONSE SITE SAMPLING TUTU WELL FIELD AND SUPERCAT AREA ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Prepared for U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Vaste Programs Enforcement Washington, D.C. 20460 EPA Work Assignment No. EPA Region Site No. Contract No. COM Federal Programs Corporation Document No. Prepared By Work Assignment Project Manager Telephone Number Primary Contact Telephone Number Date Prepared (Master 11) C020A8 II 68-W9-0002 TES5-C02048-LR-BQHD COM Federal Programs Corporation Sally Odland (212) 393-9634 Caroline Kvan (212) 264-0151 April 27, 1990 TUT OO1 0155 tutu Ucllfields, •„.. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands Volatile Organus Analrsis ol Soils in ug/kg and Uatcr in ug/l. IEUCO SOIL PILE ! PRP Location: 1 Field Saiple Nuttier: 1 EP» Saiple Nuaber: ! nttrii: Ithloroiethane IBroioiethine ivinrl Chloride ICnloroethane incthylene Chloride lAcetone 1 Carton Disultide U.l-Dichloroethene 11,1-Dichloroethint Il.:-Dichloroethene (total) !Chlorofori !l,2-0ichloroethane 12-Butanont 11,1,1-lricMoroethane ICarbon Ittrachlondt IVinrl Acetate IBroiodichlorotethane ;i,2-0uhloropropane !cis-l,3-Dtchloropropene llrichloroethene ! D I broioch 1 oroiet hane !l,l,2-Trichloroethane IBenrene :trans-l,3-Dichloropropenc IBrotofori 14 nett.rl-2-Pentanone 12-Heianone llttrtchloroethent !l.l,2,2-tetrachloroethane ! Toluene IChlorobenzene ICthrlbenzene ISUrene ;X)lene 1 total! UK's: I None Identified 5P-110P SP2-011 fll 262 soil 61 6J SP-iniO SP2-012 BX 26S soil 4 J 5P-IB01 SP2-013 BX 266 soil SP-/OP SP2-021 BX 261 toll 7 J SP-&10 SP2-022 BX 267 soil 31 J 1 J « 5 J } J } J 160 1 J 140 J 5P-/60I 5P2-023 81 261 soil R J J 2 J SPv^IOP SP2-031 IX 264 soil 1 J SP-/OP SP2-0310 61 749 soil 61 BJ SP-lniD 5P2-032 B! 747 soil SS BJ SP-i Bul SP2-033 81 748 soil 67 BJ Field Hank SP2-F62 B! 7SI water 2 J 9'3 TO TOO Tutu Ucllticld, St. Ihotas, U.S. Virgin Islands Seaivoldtile Organics Anabsls of Soils (in ug/kgl and Uattr (in ug/1) TEXACO SOIL PILE : POP Location: ! Field Satple Nuaber: ;UP [Case No. 102581 Nuaber: ! natru: i Phenol !bis(2-Chloroethrl)ether !2-Chlorophenol ll,J-Dichloroben2ene !l,i-Dichloroben2ene Henjyl alcohol 11,2-Oichlorobeniene 12-nethvlphenol :bis[2-Chloroisoprop|fl)ether IK-Nitroso-di-n-propylaiine IHeiachloroethane 1 Nitrobenzene llsophorone !2-Nitrophenol ;2,4-DiaeIh»lphenol ilenzoic acid !bis(2-Chloroethoirliethane 12,4-Oichlorophenol 11,2,4-Trichlorobenjene ! Naphthalene !t-Chloroaniline IHeiachlorobutadiene 14-CMoro-J-itthrlPhenol ;2-nettirlnaphthalene IHeiachlorocirclopentadiene !2,i,6-Trichlorophenol 12.4, j- Inch lor opfitnol 12-CMoronaphthalene ;2-Nitroaniline IDiatthrlphthalate lAcenaphthrlene !2,6-Dmitrotoluene !}-Nitroaniline lAcenaphthene !2,t-Dinitrophenol !i-Nitrophenol IDibenzofuran 12.4-Dinitrotolutne IbiethrlPhthalate 14-Chlorophenrl-phenrlether IFluorene !4-Nitroaniline !4,6-Olnitro-2-aethiilphenol !M -Nitrosodiphenrlaiine It) SP2-010 61 749 soil sr-i SP2-011 (I 262 soil 5P2-021 II 26! soil 5P2-031 IX 2t,4 soil > f. . TOO J i' lulu UellfielJ. St. lno»as. U.S. Virgin Islands Scuvolatilt Organic} Anal r sis ol Soils lin ug/kgl and U«ter (in ug/1) TEIACO SOIL PILE 1 PRP Location: 1 Field SrtPle Muaber: 1CLP (Cast Nt.lOHt) NjiUir: 1 llatrii; !Htiachlorob«n;«nt IPtntachloropncnol IPhrnanthrtnc (Anthracene ;Di-n-Butylphthalat< IFluoranthene ihrene IButrlttnnlPhthalate !l,3'-Dlchlorobcn<idine !B«n2ola)anthractne IChrmne !biU2-Ethrlheiyl)phthalate IDi-n-octrlPhthalate !Ben2olb)fluortnthene !B(n;o(kl(luoranthene !lndeno(l,2,}-cd)prrene !Diben2la,Mtnthracene !Ben2o(g,h,i)perrlent UK's: ;t-H»droi»-4 ntthrI-2-pentan I Aliphatic hydrocarbon IHeptadtcane !OctaJecane INonadecane SP-/6 SP2-OJO Bt ?i« soil 1) 5P-I SP2-011 B» 2t? toil II 120 J SP-/ SP2-021 Bl 2t) iOil 41 J II 110 ] 110 NJ no : 110 J sp-7 5P2-OJ1 BI W mil It c lulu Uclllitld, St. Thoias. U.S. Virgin Islands Pesticide/PCfl AnaUsis of Soils I in u»/k«l and Uaters (in us/11 1EUCO SOIL PILE ! PRP local ion: 1 Field SatPlc Huibtr: ! CLP 112058) Nuibfr: ! flatrii: lalpha-BHC IbMa-BMC Idelta-BHC Isaaia-BHC ILindancI IHeptachlor lAldrin IHeptacMor epoiidc lEndosulfan I ICHfldrin :M'-DDE lEndrin lEndosulfan II lEndosulfin sulfatt 14, ('-DPI Intthoirchlor lEndrln kttone lalphi-Chlordane Igaiii-Chlordine IToiaphtnt IArochlor-1016 lArochlor-1221 IArochlor-1232 !Arochlor-12i2 lArochlor-1241 [Arochlor-1254 IArochlor-1260 I10IAL PESI/PCB. SP-1 SP2-OI1 6X 262 soil 5P2-021 BI 261 soil NO PESUC1D SP2-OJ1 BI 264 soil S OR PCBs D SP2-0310 BT 749 soil TECTEO Tutu UelllielJ, St. Ihoiai, U.S. Virgin hlandi Total Petroleui HrJrocarbon IIPHI Analr&is (toil in ua/g, Uattr in ig/!l TEXACO SOIL PILE PUP Location: Field Saiole NuiHer: CLP ISA5 «512B) Nuiber: Total Pctroleui Hrdrocarbon SP-1 5P2-OI 45128-10,11 30' 5P-/ 5P2-02 15126-15.14 62' SP-f SP2-03 4M2B-16.17 20 J1 SP-i ;Fifld Blank 5P2-OJO : SP2-f»2 4M2B-21.22; 4512B-24 (10 V 1 (1 ig/1 'Averaged value Tutu Uelltield. St. Inoijs, U.S. Virgin Islinds if loncitr Analius ot Soil in u«/l TUACO SOIL PILE PRP location: f .eld jsiplt Nuibrr: CLP ISAS 46546) Nult.tr: Arstnic Bariui Cadiiui Chroiiui Lud Htrcury Stlfniul Silver SP-1 SP2-01 46586-12 R 2.2 S ft I.I ] SP-3 SP?-02 itSSB-lS R 2.J ] R 31.0 J R 5P-5 5P2-OJ 16MB- 11 II O.Si J II R SP-b 5P2-03 OUP 46516-23 R 0.35 J R 5.7 J| Field Blink SP2-FB2 46586-25 1} R lutu UellMeldl Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands lOUel letter Response Site Saiphng Volatile Organics Analysis ol Soils in ug/kg and Water in ug/1. 0'HENR» DRY CLEANERS 1 Field Saiple Nuibfr: I EPA Sdtple Umber: 1 natru: iChloroiethane iflro»o«thant IVinrl Chloride IChloroethane IHethrlene Chloride lAcetone ICarbon Disultide 1, 1-Dicnloroethene !l,l-0ichloroethane 11,2-Dichloroethene Itotal) ICMorolori !l.2-0uhloroethane !2-Butanonr 11,1,1-lrichloroethane ; Carbon Tetrachloride IVinil Acetate llrmodichlorotethane !l,2-Dichloropro»ane Uis-1, J-DicMoroproctne :irkhloroethene tDibroiochloroiethane :i.l^2-1richloroethane !Bfn:ene !trans-l,i-Dichloropropene IBroiolon 14 neth»l-2-Pentanone ;2-Heianone lletrachloroetnene ( ;i.l,2,2-letrachloroethane lloluene IChlorobenzene lEthrlbenzene IStyrene Urlene (total) e02-01 BX 261 soil 170000 e02-02 Bl 259 soil 1H BJ J4 J 20 J 12 J 75 - - - - - — 180000 - —— ——— -t • e02-03 BX 258 soil 2 J 1 .___ "" X • . 51 J e02-FBl BI 200 vater lie's: Pentanr,2-iethoi)-2,l,t-tr 150 NJ 39 TO TOO mi lutu UfllluU, Ihotoi, U.S. Virgin Islands lOUel Utter Response Site Sampling Organic* Analrsis ol Soils lin ug/kg) and Uater lin ug/1) O'MCNRr ! Field Saiple Nuaber: ;UP ICase No. 102511 Nuaber: I natrii: IPhenol :bis(2-Chloroeth»llether 12-Cnlorophenol 11.3-Dichlorobenzene !l,*-0ichloroben:ene IBenirl akohol ll,2-0ichloroben;ene 12-nethrlphenol !bis(2-Chloroisopropylletner ll-nethdphenol !N-Nitroso-Oi-n-proprlaaine IHeiachloroethanc INitrobenzene !2-Nitrophenol :2,(-Onethrlphenol !8en;oic acid !bis(2-Chloroethoiir)aethane !2,i-Dichloropl\enol ;i,2,t-Ir!cMorobfnitne INapMhalene ' !i-Chloroaniline iHeiachlorobutadiene !2-nethrlnaphthalene iHeiachlorocrclopentadiene ',2,(,6-Irichlorophenol !2,(.S-lrichloroptienol !2-Chloronaphthalene !2-Nitroaniline IDiaethrlphthalate lAcenaphthrlene 12,6-Dinitrotoluene ;}-Nitr<>aniline '.Acenaphthene !2,(-Dinitrophenol !(-Nitrophenol IDibenzoluran !2,(-Dinitrotoluene IDiethilpnthalate 1 1 -Ch loropheni I -phenr lether !f luorene It-Nltroaniline !t,6-Dinitrb-2-aet>irlprienol IN-Nitrosodipnenrlaaine 111 e02-D) Bl 2SI soil 59 NJ e02-Q2 B» 2S9 soil e02-01 81 261 soil R £9 TO TOO in..I.. lulu UellllMd, Si. IhOUs, U.S. Virgin 104(cl letter Response Site itilvolatilf Organic s Analysis of Soils (in ug/k«) and Utter (in uj/ll O 1 HENRY 1 Field Sa»le Nuibtr; XL? ICaic No 102581 Nuibtr: ! Hatrn: ! i -eroiophenr 1 -phenr lether IHeitchlorobeniene IPentachlorophenol IPnentnthrene I Anthracene IDi-n-tutrlphthalatt !Muoranthent !P»rene IButylbenzrlphthalate Il.i'-Duhlorobeniidine !Benzola)anthracene ;Chr»sene Ibisl2 Ethrlheirllphthalate !Di-n-octrlphthalate !Ben2olti)fluoranthene Itenzolkltluoranthene IBeniolalprrene ! Indeno(l,2,3-cd)prrene !Diben2(a,h)anlhricent !B(n2olg,h,i)perirlene UK's: lAldol ' iHeptadecane, '2,6-Oiaethrl- (02-0} 8« 2SI soil 280 1 ft (02-02 It 259 soil J90 : R UOO NJ e02-01 8X 261 soil MO R UOO NJ lutu Uellfield, it Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands lOt(e) letter Response Site Saapling Pesticide/PCB Analysis of Soils (in ug/kg) and Haters I in ug/ll O'MENRr DRY CLEANERS 1 Field Saiple Nuibtr: ! CLP 112051) Nuibtr: ! natrn: lalpht-BHC Ibeta-BNC lilelta-BHC Igaaia-BHC (Lindanel iHeptacnlor lAldrin iHcptachlor epoude lEndosultan 1 IDieldrin ;«,4'-DDE lEndrin iCndosultan II Xt'-DDO lEndosulfan sulfate K.C-DOI lltethoircnlor Itndrin ketone lalpha-Chlordane Igaaaa-Chlordane lloiaphent !Arochlor-IOI6 IArochtor-1221 !»rochlor-l2J2 ;Arochlor-1242 :Arochlor-124i !Arochlor-12St IArochlor-1260 IIOIAL PESI/PCBs e02-01 (I 261 soil e02-02 11 259 soil NO PES1ICID e02-OJ BI 251 toll S 0* PCBS D (02-F61 II 260 water TCCTED lutu Uelllield, St. Uious, U.S. Virgin Islands Second Round 10.k) Saicling \Ail Mroleui Mxdrooarbon (IPHl Analrsii IJoiU in ug/g; Unttrs in ig/1) O'HCNIiy DOT ClfANfRS Field S»plt Nuiber: CLP (5*5 451261 Nulbcr: lota! Pttroltui Hrdrocarbon C02-01 (5126-1.2 302' ' Averaged e02-02 i512B-4.5 865" lalue (02-0) 45121-7,1 51' e02-FBl 4SI2B-1) (1 ig/l lulu Utllfitld. St. Ihotai. U.S. Virgin Islands Second Round IDUel E.P. luiuitr Analms of Soil in us/1 0'HENRY W1 CLEANERS Field :>a>ple NuiDer: CLP (S*S 465SB) Nuttier: Arsenic Bariui Cidnui Chronui Leid Hercur» Sdeniui Silver e02-01 (6SaB-l R O.ii ) R R ei)2-02 U5J6-6 R O.Jt ) D R e02-03 (6SSB-9 R .a ] R C02-FB1 46SJ6-20 101 R 1.3 Xi *„• lulu yellfields. 31. Inotas, U.S. Virgin Islands lOtle) Letter Response Site Saipling Volatile Organics Anal/sis of Soils in ug/kg and Uater in ug/1. OEPI. OF EDUCATION I LAG*I ! Field Sdiple Nuaber: 1 EPA Saiple Nuaber: ! Itatru: !Chloroaethane IBroaoaethane IVinyl Chloride IChloroethane INelhrlene Chloride lAcetone [Carbon Oisullidt !l,l-Dichloroethene Il.l-Olchloroethane 11,2-Dichloroethene Itottl) IChlorolon !l,2-Dichloroethane 12-Butanont ',1,1,1-Trichloroethane ; Carbon letrachloride Ivinrl Acetate IBroaodichloroiethane 11,2-Dichloropropane Uis-l.J-Oichloropropene llrichloroethene IDibroaochloroaethane :i,-l,2-1richloroethane ;Btn;ent !trans-l,i-Dichloropropene ISroaolora !«-nethrl-2-Pentanone 12-Heianone lletrachloroethene 11,1,2,2-letrachloroetMne 1 Toluene IChlorobenzene lEthrlbenzene IStrrene Hrlene (total) CL-D2-01S BT 759 toil R 200 J (20 J UOO J el-02-02S BV 760 soil It 00 J el-02-OJS BV 761 soil * eL-02-045 BX 141 water 12 J el-02-OSS BI W soil fi eL-02-FBl 6» 762 uater eL-02-FB2 BI ^O uater eL-02-Tfll BI 99] uater I T l C ' s : !Bicrclo|l.].l]non-2-en-9-o 1 Phenol jP«ntdnc.2-itthoir-2,l.4-tr 21 N) R R 190 MJ iHeptane.l.J.S-triaethd 89 TO TOO li'll 29 NJ I Li lutu Ucllfielbi, 5t. Inoias. U.S. Virjin Islands 10(1(1 Letter Response $it( Saaplms Volatile Organics Analysis of Soils in ua/kj and Uater in ug/1. DEN. OF EDUCATION (LAGAI Field Saiplt Nuibrr: F.PA Saiplt Nuibtr: natru: Heptane, 2, !,6-triiftri»l el-02-OIS 6T 7S9 soil eL-02-025 BY 760 soil eL-02-0« B> 761 soil el-02-0»5 BI 991 •ater 29 NJ eL-02-05S BI 992 soil eL-02-FBl 8V 762 yater eL-02-FB2 BI 990 utter eL-02-IBl BX 993 »ater >'\ •*»»/ n N. g o §!! IS> * 1* o o - s • I o v> ? s ^ I I tutu UtllMeld. St. Thoaas. U.S. Virgin Islands lOtle) Letter Response Site Saipling Ptsticide/PCB Analrsis of Soils lin ug/kgl and Uaters (in ug/ll OEP1 OF EOOCAI10N ILAGAl ! Field Saaple Nuioer: ! CLP 1120511 Nuioer: ! Hatrii: lalpha-BHC iBeta-BHC Idelta-BHC Igaaia-BHC ILindanel IHeptachlor !«ldrin Ineptachlor epoude lEndosulfan 1 IDieldrin !Fndrin lEndosulfan 11 Xt'-DDD lEndosultan sulfate U.t'-DOI llttthoirchlor lEndrin ketone Ijlor.a-Chlordane Igana-Chlordane lloiaphene lArochlor-1016 >rochlor-1221 lArochlor-1232 lArochlor-1242 ;»rochlor-12U :»rochlor-!25* IArochlor-1260 1IOIAL PESI/PCfls (L-02-01S BY 759 soil 92 eL-02-02S BY W soil eL-02-035 BY 761 soil «L-02-f81 BY 762 vater lutu Utlltitld. St. Ihoiai, U.S. Virgin Island Second Round lOtlel Sliding total Petroleut Hrdrocarbon IIPHl Analrm (Soils in ug/g; Uattrs in •«/!) OtPI OF EDUCATION IU&M Field Saiple Nutber: CLP (5 AS 451261 »u«6er; Total PetroUut Hrdrocarbon el-02-Oli 4SI2B-26 }(70 (L-02-02S 45126-27 1730 el-02-OJj 4S126-2J S(i eL-02-FBl 45126-29 (1 ig/1 °f lulu Uellfield, St. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands Second Round lOtUI Stic I ins E.P. loiicitt Analrsis of Soil in ug/t OtPl OF EDUCATION I LAC*I Field Sskple Nuiber: CLP (SAS U58B) NuiDef: Arsenu Bariui Cadiiui Chronui lead nercury Scltniui Silver eL-02-Ols Mil- In » 2.1 J II 11.0 J «L-02-02i itSIB-2; II 0.12 J 5.3 J el-02-Ols 46S!e-2« II 2.4 ] II 8.5 ] eL-02-FBl US8B-21) II II lutu Uellfield. St. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands lOtlel Letter Response Site Saipling Seiivolatile Organics Analysis of Soils lin us/kg) and Uater (in ut/1) DEPI. OF EDUCATION lLAGA) ! Field Saiple Nuiber: ICLP ICese No. 10258) Nuiber: ', flatru: 14-Broiophenrl-phenyUlhtr jHeiachlorobenzene IPentacMorophenol IPheninthrene Anthracene IDi-n-ButylPhthalite IFluorinthene iPrrene !Butrlben2rlphth>late 13, 3' -Dichloroben;idine !Ben2o(<)anthrtcene IChrrscnc ;bis(2-[thylheir!)phthaUte IDi-n-octrlPhthalite ;6en;olb)lluoranthene ;Ben:o(k)tluor«nthene Kenzolalprrtne ! Indenol 1 , 2, J-cd)p»rene ;Dibenj(»,h)jnlhracene ;6en;o(s,h,l|perrlene UK's: INonane ICW18 lioitr lAliphatic hrdrocarbon IDecane (8CIW1) :ct-benztnt isoier IC10H20 isoier IKjpthelene. dtcahrdro, tra lUnoecane UCI9CII ;tth»lphenol isoter ^-Octadecenou acid IZI- !i-Hrdroir-(-iethrl-2-pentan ICl-beniene liOier llH-lndtnt, 2,1-dihndro- ICHHJZ isoaer IC10H12 isoier ICS-benzene Isoier '. 1-Hethylnapthalene !C2-Naptnalent isoier H-02-015 BT 759 soil R 140000 NJ 1SOOOO J 200000 J 710000 NJ 120000 J 160000 J 77000 NJ 110000 NJ 170000 J 650000 NJ el-02-025 BY 760 soil 20000 J 59000 NJ SiOOO J 55000 NJ I J6000 J 22000 NJ 17000 J el-02-OJS BY 761 soil 120 J II 17/.TO TOO If LI.. lutu Uelllields, St. Thoias, U.S. Virgin Islands lOUel letter Response Site SaiPling Volatile Organics Anabsis at Soil* in ug/kg and U RAIISA» noTO* co. Field Saiole Nuiber; EPA Stiple Nuiber: Flatrii: IChloroiethane Itroioiethane IVinrl Chloride ICMoroethgne inethrlene Chloride lAcetone [Carbon Disullide !l,l-0ichloroethene 11.1-Dichloroethane 11.2-Oichloroetriene (total) ICMoroton 11.2-Dichloroethane 12-But anont ;i,l,l-Irichloroethane ;Carbon letrachlonde IVinrl Acetate !troiodichloro*ethane 11,2-Dichloropropane !cis-l.i-0ichloropropene llrichloroethene IDibroiochloroiethane 11,1,2-lrichloroethane iBeniene !trans-l,3-Dichloropropene IBroiofora H-neth»l-2-Pentanone !2-Heianone lletrachloroethene 11,1,2,2-Ietrachloroethane llviluene IChlorobeniene ICthrlbenzene IStrrene Itrlene Itotall eR-02-OlS OX 944 soil 200 J IlC's: CJHt-Benzene isoier l,2-Dieth>l benzene JC4H10 Benzene isoier 11000 BJ 17000 KJ 6000 J lulu Uelltield, St. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands IQtle) letter Response Site Saipling Sealvolatile urganics Analysis ol Soils (in uj/kgl an »MISA» iwioft co. ! Field Saiple Nuitier: ;cif ICase No.10251) Nurttr: ; natrii: !Phenol ;bis(2-Chloroeth»llether 12-Chlorophenol ;i,3-0ichlorobenzene ;i,i-Dichloroben:ene !Ben2>l alcohol !l,2-Duhloroben;ene ;2-nethHphenol ;bisl2-Chloroisoprop»l)ether ;4-nethrlphenol jM-Nitroso-di-n-proprlaiine iHeiachloroethane !Nitrobenzene llsophorone ',2-Nitrophenol !2,i-DnethylPhenol IBenioic acid !bis(2-Chloroethoiy)*ethane !2.i-Dichlorophenol ;i,2,4-lrichloroben2ene Naphthalene U-CMoroani lint iHeiachlorobutadiene l4-Chloro-]-*ethirlphenol 12-flethirlnaphthalene IHeiachlorocrclopentadlene !2,4,t-1richlorophenol i2,t,S-lrichloruptienol !2-Chloronaphthalene !2-Nitroaniline IDiiethrlpnthalate !*cenaphthrlene !2,b-Dinitrotoluene IJ-Nitroaniline lAcenapnthtne 12,4-Dinitrophenol ',4-Nitrophenol IDibenzofuran !2,4-Dinitrotoluene '.Diethrlphthalate ',4-Chlorophenrl-Phenrlether IFluorene !4-Nitroaniline 'i4,b-Uinitro-2-aethi>lPhenol IN-Nitrosodiphentlaairie 111 tft-02-OlS BI 9>4 soil 4400 6100 140 J 420 J ) of lutu Uellfield, St. Ihous, U.S. Virgin Islands lOiltl Letter Response Site baiplint Seiivolatile Organici Analrsis of Soils (in ug/kg) in «»H5A» noion co. ! Field Saiple Nuiber: ICLP (Case No.l02S8) Nuibtr. ! Hdtrii: U-Broiophtnrl-phenrltthcr IHeigchlorobcnzene IPentachlorophfnol IPhenanthrcne 1 Anthracene IDi-n-Butrlphthalate !f luoranthene IPrrene !But»lben2irlphthalate 13,)' -Oichlorobeniidine IBenzolalanthracene IChrrsene ;bisl2-Ethrlheirl|phthal«te ;0i-n-octrlphthalate 1 Benzol bllluoranthene IBenioUKluoranthent !Benjola)prrene !lndeno(l,2,}-cd)prrene ;Dibeni(a.h)anthracene IBeniolt.h.ilptrrlene UK's: INonane !C9H1> isoaer lAliphatic hydrocarbon Ibecane I8CI9CI) ICt-benjene -isoaer IUOH20 isoier INapthalene, decahrdro, trt lUndtcane (8C19C1! lEthrlphenol isoier ;?-Octadecenoic acid IZI- i(-Hrdroir-(-iethrl-2-pentan !C)-ben:ene isoier llH-lndene, 2,3-dihrdro- 1C19H32 isottr IC10H12 isoier !CS-btn2ene isoier Il-Nethrlnapthilene !C^-Napthalene isoier eft-02-01S BX 9tt soil 7(0 J 2000 iiOO 170 J 770 J 4)0 J 2100 J 4700 J R lUOO J 4000 J JSOO ] 4600 NJ 3800 J 00 lutu Uflllield, St. Thoias, U.S. Virgin Iblands lOile) letter Response Site Saipling PestKide/PCB Unalrsis ol Soils lin ug/kgj and Uaters (in ug/l) i)*ns*y noiOR co. Field baipU Kuiber: CLP 112058) Hu.ber: natrn: lalpha-BHC !b(ta-6HC Idtlta-BMC igana-BHC Ilindanc) IHeptachlor !«ldrin iHcptachlor epoudt ICndosuKan 1 IDieldrin :4,t'-oDe ICndrin lEndosullan II Xt'-DDO lEndo&uUan sullatt H.t'-ODt Inethoiirchlor ICndrin ketont lalpha-Chlordanc Igaiia-Chlordanc IToiaphcne ;»rocnlor-!OI6 ;«rochlor-1221 ;*rochlor-!2J2 ;Arochlor-12t2 :*rocMcr-12t8 ;»rochlor-125t IArochlor-1260 ;iOUL PESt/KBs eR-02-01S BX 98i soil NO PESTIC10 S OR PCBs DEC1ECUD Tutu Utlltitld, M Ihoiai. U.S. Virgin Islands Second Round ItUltl Saipling Total Pflroltua Mrdrocarbon I1PHI Analrsit (Soils in uj/s; Mattrs in ig/ll RAHSAY HOI OR CO. Field Staple Nuater: CLP (SAS 45128) Mulber: Total Petroltua Hydrocarbon (R-02-02S 45126-40 23400 lulu u e l l f i t l d , SI. ThoMi. U.S. Vngm Islands Second Round lOUel Sampling It. Toiicitr Analrsis of Soil in ug/l noIOR co. Fitld Saiplc Nuibtr: (IP 15 AS 4658BI Nuttier: Aritnic Binui Cidnui Chronui Lead Hercurr Seleniut Silvtr eR-02-02s 46586-40 1) 6.1 II 15.0 ] lulu Uellfields. St. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands lOilel Ittttr Response Site SaiPling Volatile Orginici Analrtit of Soils in ug/kg and Utter in ug/1. SUPERCAI SHE Y CC! T—)o : Field Saaple NuiOer: ! EPA Saaple Nuatier: ; hatrii: ICI.Urotethane IBroaoitthane IVinrl Chloride IChloroelhene Inethyltne Chloride lAcetone 1 Carbon Disulfide Il.l-Dichloroethtne Il.l-Dichloroethane ;i,2-0ichloroethen« (total! IChlorofora ',1,2-Dichloroethane !2-Butanone 11,1,1-lrichloroethane ; Cor Don letrachlonde IVinyt Acetate IBroiodichloroiethane !l,2-0ichloropropane !cis-l,]-Dichloropropene llruhloroethene IDitroaochloroiethane 11,1,2-Irichloroethane ',Ben;ene :trans-l,}-DichlQropropene IBroiofon !4-nethrl-2-Pentanone !2-Heianone lletrachloroethene :i,l,2,2-Ietrachloroethane lloluene !Chloroben2ene lE'hrlbenjene IStrrene !Xrlene (total! eSC-02-Ola 61 994 water 110 eSC-02-02a BI 99S water eSC-02-OiS BI 997 soil 1) J ) J IS J eSC-02-055 BI 99B soil 27 IS J CSC-02-06S BI 976 toil 67 J 7 J 31 1 13 J 20 J 110 J eSC-02-07i BX 977 101 1 10 J eSC-02-09S BI 971 soil 4) J CSC-02-10S BI 913 soil } ] (SC-02-03F6 BI 996 water e$C-02-OSfB BI 979 water ; eSC-02-lB BV 764 water IUOO ; \ / f \ i J700 ) ^_^ 1700 .£00 eSC-02-161 BI 9B1 water 4 J 2 J : IlC'i: !l-Propene,2-itthil- Idonane ;0<tane,J,5-Dnethxl- 5100 N] JOO NJ SOO NJ 38 TO TOO IC'll — • </» — S o•" s 5 o •* o «•-*o •f 0 ? s Vi s •r* * 2 o* 1 0 I Q. ^ * 5 ,0 OB <*• = •D CO ao oO S * s i 1 WJ •* b. « 1 2 1 o kit 1 o o •1 9 fc. 3 U. » s s g ""* — S X o 3 -^ — » -^ — . -^ o o •-* — «•> o = = = o S-^ r = 5 •;:-£ j £ ^ ^ - y s - ? i S 7 : ? 1 5 1 I 1 1 -lif--i v — a v * • c * o i me - m « C C -. C 4* JZ « f > . « r f « l • U W 3 4 > 3 > * . * > V ' *f >. ** flO ( ^ • p o o t / i ^ i « i _ * i _ j ^ c ^ ^ i _ t ^ « — ' lutu Uelltield. St. Thoias, U.S. Virgin Islands IDUe) Letter Response 5ite Saipling Senvoiatile Orjenics Analrsis of Soils (in ug/kgl and Hater I in u»/l) SUPERC*! SHE CO : Field Saiple Nuiber: ICLP (Case No. 10258) Nuiber: I natrii: 1 Phenol IbisU-CMoroethHlether 12-Chlorophenol ;i,J-Oichloroben:ene 11,4-tnchlorobenjene IBtnnl alcohol !l,2-0ichlorobenjene ! 2 -flethyl phenol !bisl2-Chloroisoprop»l)ether n-nethylphenol IN-Nitroso-di-n-proprlaiine iHeiachloroethane iNitrobenzene llsophorone ',2-Nitrophenol 12.4-tiiaethHphenol Itenzoic acid !bis(2-Chloroethoiy)iethane 12,1-Dichlorophenol 11,2,4-Irichlorobenjene 1 Naphthalene !4-Chloroaniline !Heiachlorobutadiene 14-Chloro-i-iethrlphenol !2-Heth>lnaphthalene IHeiachlorocrclopentadiene :2,4,6-Trichlorophenol l2,4,S-1richlorophenol !2-CMoronaphthalene !2-Nitroaniline :oiaeth»lphthalate lAcenaphthylene !2,b-Dinitrotoluene !5-Nitro«niline !«cenaphthene 12,4-Dinitrophenol 14-Nitrophenol IDibenioturan !2.4-Dinitrotoluene IDiethrlphthalate ! 4 -CMorophenr l-phenr lether ;f luortnt |4-Nitroaniline IN-Nltro&odiphenrlaaine 11) fSC -02-65 61 97t soil eSC-02-7s 61 977 soil e5C-02-9S (I 971 soil eSC-02-105 tl 9tl soil eSC-02-4S BI 997 soil eSC-02-5S BX 99B soil lulu Mellfield, St. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands lOUel Letter Response Site Stapling Senvolatile Organics Analrsis of Soils (in ug/kg) and Utter (in ug/l) SUPERCM SHE 03 I field Saiple Nuibtr: 1CLP (Case NO.I025D) Nuiber I rtatru: li-BroiOPhenrl-phenrlether IHeiachlorobtnztnt !Fentachlorophenol IPhenanthrene Anthracene IDi-n-Butylphthalate IFluorenthene IPirene :6utrlben2ilphthalatt ; J. J' -Dichlorobfnndinf IBcnzolalanthracene IChrnstne !bisl2-Cth)lheirl)phthalate !Di-n-octrlphthalate !Benzolb)(luoranthene iSehzolkltluoranthene IBenzoltlprrene llndfnoll.2, J-cJlprrtnt IDibenzl a, h (anthracene IBenzoIg.h.ilperrlene UK's: :;-Hyilroir-(-*ethrl-2-pentan ^Aliphatic hrdrocarbon ISulter, iol (Stl eSC-02-liS B> 976 soil R 2300 J eSC-02-7s 61 977 soil R eSC-02-95 BI 971 soil R 160 BJ ,' eSC-02-105 BI 911 soil R e5C-02-*5 11 997 soil 2100 J 2000 J 10000 R 4900 J (100 NJ e5C-02-55 BX 991 soil R lulu Uellfield, St. Thoias. U.S. Virgin Islands I04(e) Letter Response Site Saiplin« Pesticide/PCB Anelrsis ol Soils (in us/kg I and Utters I in us/11 SUPEKAI SHE in GO ! Field Saiple Nu«btr; 1 CLP 112051) NuiDer: 1 natrii: lalpha-BHC !beta-BHC Idelti-BHC Igaiia-BHC iLindane) IHePtachlor IMdrin iHtptociilor eponde ICndosuKan 1 IDieldrin U.i'-OOE Itndrin !Endosulfan II X*'-DOD lEndosulfan sultate ;t,4'-D01 InethoiycMor lEndrtn ketone lalpha-Chlordane ;«aua-Chlordane lloiaphtnt lArochlor-1016 ;*rochlor-1221 :*rochlor-l2)2 ;«rochlor-12t2 ;»rochlor-1246 !»rochlor-1254 IArochlor-1260 :tOI»L PESI/PCBs eSC-02-Ola BI 99* uater eSC-02-02a 61 995 uater eSC-02-IUS BI 99? soil eSC-02-05S 61 991 toil eSC-02-Ob$ (I 97<> soil 55 eSC-02-07S 61 97? soil eSC-02-09S BI 971 soil fSC 02-105 61 98! soil tSC-02-OJFB BI 996 vittr eSC-02-OHFB BI 979 uater (I 1 lulu UMlfield, St. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands Stcond Round 10411) Sliding lolal Petroteui Hydrocarbon ITPH) Analysis (Soils In ug/g; Utters in ig/1) SUPERCM SHE -0 CO •H Field Sup If Nuibtr: CLP (S»5 til 26 1 Nuibtr: total Pctroltui Hydrocarbon eSC-02-Ola 45128-10 2 ig/1 (SC-02-02a 45128-J1 (1 ig/1 cSC-02-Ols 4S12B-33 U70 eSC-02-OSs 4512B-34 65iO (SC-02-06S 4M2B-3S 21500 eSC-02-07s 15126-J6 (10 eSC-02 09s 4512B-J8 1830 «SC-02-03fB «SC-02-0«F6 45121-32 45126-!? (1 ig/1 (1 ig/1 lulu uellfield, St. Ihoits, U.S. Virgin Islands Second Hound lOilt) Stapling l.F. loucitr Anibsis of Soil in ug/1 UXACO CARU6EAN, SUPERCAT fit [<1 Suplf NulDtr: CIP ISAS 465881 Nulber: Arsenic Bsrlui Cadoui Chroiiui Ltid Nercurr Seltniut Silver eI5C-02-01s 46586-39 R 0.45 R f '\ > a I'r; « lutu Uell(iel<J, St. IhoMS, U.S. Virgin Ulindt Second Round lOilel Siiollng r f. loncitr »n»hus of Soil in ug/l SUPERCAT SHE CD :~r; Field Siiple Nuiber: CLf (SAS 465881 Nuiber: Arsenic Bariut Cidiiui Chroiiui Leid Her cur r Seleniui Silver eSC-02-02l 46588-31 ft R 2.J eSC-02-0«i 465M-JJ 1.0 J I5S J 36.0 J R 978 J (SC-02-OSt 46586- J4 1560 ] 3.6 J ».0 J e5C-02-OH 46588-35 1290 12.0 R 40.0 J eSC-02-07t 46588-36 R 0.26 2.8 J tsc-02-cm 4658B-J8 t l.l J 1.4 J eSC-02-03FB 46588-32 J9.2 ft eSC-02-OIFB 465SB-3? * C/ lulu Utllfield. St. Ihoidi, U.S. Virgin Islands Stcond Round IO»UI lotal Pttruleui Hydrocarbon 11PH) Analysis (Soils in ug/g. Utttrs in u/ll KlACO CMItBCAN Field Suple NuiDtr; CLP ISAS 45126) Nulbtr: lotsl Pttroltui Hydrocarbon (ISC-02-OU 4512B-39 (10 0-- 03 Tutu Uelltields. 5t. Thotas. U.S. Virgin Islands Volatile Organics Analysis of 5oilt in u«/kg and Uater in u«/l. ESSO SOU PILE ! PUP Location; ! Held baiple Nuiber: 1 EPA Saaple Kuiber: I Matrii: IChlgroaethane IBroioie thane IVinrl Chloride IChloroethane Iflethrlene Chloride 1 Acetone ICarbon Disulfide 11,1-Oichloroethene Il.l-Oichloroethane 11,2-Oichloroethene (total) IChlorofon 11,2-Dichloroethane 12-Butanone 11,1,1-lruMoroethane ICarbon letrachloride IViurl Acetate IBroioduhloroiethane 11,2'Dichloroprwane lcis-1 , 3-Oichloroprottne llrichloroethene lOibroioihloroiethane 11,1.2-Irichloroethane Iflenjene ltrans-l,3-Dichloropropene IBroiofori l4-nethrl-2-Pentanone 12-Heianone IMrachloroethene 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ;i fluent IChlorobenjene lEthrlbeniene I5trrene Urlene (total) 1 U C ' s : ;Neptane.3,5-di«th,l- lHeptane.3-«th»l- I0ctane,2-aethrl INonane I0clane.2,3-Diiethrl- SP-1IOP E5P-01T BY 702 soil 7 J 270 210 NJ 230 NJ 500 NJ 300 NJ I 590 NJ ! sp-inio ESP-oin BY703 soil 210 J 3300 5100 2100 NJ 3700 NJ 5P-1BO! ESP-018 BY 704 soil 460 J 780 2500 1500 2700 NJ 4700 NJ 5200 NJ 5P-210P ESP-02I BY 705 soil R 240 J 3600 2500 NJ 3100 NJ ! SP-2KID E5P-02B BY 707 soil R 550 J 750 J 13000 4600 NJ 4700 NJ I 6000 NJ ! 5P-2BOT E5P-02B BY 709 soil R 360 J 15000 J 8joo NJ ; SP-3TOP E5P-031 BY 711 soil R 2100 J 2100 NJ .MOO NJ 3600 NJ ! SPiniD E5P-OSM BY 712 soil R 4tOO 2600 NJ UOO NJ 5000 NJ ! SP-3BOI E5P-03B BY 713 soil 8 1300 1500 NJ 3200 NJ 2400 NJ I 3700 NJ ! Field Blank E5P-fB3 BY 701 water 1 J i lulu Uellfitlds, 51 tr.ous. U.S. Virgin Islands Volatile Or«anics *nal»sis ot Soils in ug/k« and Uattr in uj/i. ESSO SOIL PILE o-- 1 PRP Location: 1 Field Saaple Nuaber: ! EP» Saaple Nuaber: ! flatrii: i Octant, J-itthrl tNonane,3 aetliyl- I Heptane, 2, 4-diaetM- lEthrlaethylbeniene isoaer 7-neth»rtridecene Heptane Benzene, l-ethrl-2-aetnrl Oecane Benzene, 1,2,4 -truethrl - 2,3-hepladien-5-rne,2.4-di Benzene, ll-aethrletn>ll- Beniene.proprl- Substituted benzene Alkane Heiane,2,S-diaethil Benzene 1,2.3-tritethrl- Triiethrl benzene isoaer Methyl octane isoier Pentane,2,2,4-tritethrl- SP-1IOP E5P-011 BY 702 soil 490 NJ 240 NJ 1200 NJ 1200 NJ 5P-1H10 ESP-01H BY703 soil 3200 NJ 48000 J 1300 J 1800 J 24000 NJ SP-1BOI ESP-01B BY 704 soil 2000 NJ 53000 NJ 24000 NJ 2300 NJ 8200 NJ 2900 NJ SP-210P CSP-02T BY 70S soil 2000 NJ 1600 NJ 36000 J 1300 J SP-2I1IO ESP-02H BY 707 soil 62000 J 2SOO NJ 32000 NJ 4100 NJ 4700 NJ 5900 J SP-2B01 ESP-026 61 709 soil 9800 NJ 40000 J 4500 NJ t.8000 NJ 4500 NJ S200 NJ 5P-3IOP E5P-03I BY 711 soil 13000 J 6400 J 3300 NJ 3000 NJ SPJfllD E5P-03H BY 712 soil 4600 NJ 33000 J 2200 NJ 34000 J 5P-3BOI ESP-03B BY 713 soil 7600 J 1800 NJ IbOO NJ 10000 NJ Field Blank ESP-FBS BY 701 uater •r Tutu Uellfield, St. Thous, U.S. Virgin Islandi Senvolatile Or gin u 4 Anahsis ol Soils Itn u</Hl and Ualer (in uj/ll CSSO SOIL PILE ; PRP Location: ! Field Said It Nuiber: ;CLP (Case Ho. 102581 Nuiber 1 natrii: ! Phenol I6isl2-Chloroelhrl)ether !2-CMorophenol ;i,3-0ichloroben2ene 11,4-Dichlorobenitne IBen»l alcohol 11,2-Dlchlorobenzene !2-Hethrlphenol !bi si 2-Chloroisoproprl lether 14-ntthylphenol IN Nitroio-di-n-proprl«iine IHeiachloroethant INitroberutnt ilsophorone 12 Nitrophenol !2,4-Diiethrlphenol !Ben;oic acid ;bisl2-Chloroethoiy)iethane 12,4-Dichlorophenol :i,2,4-Irichlorobenjene INaphthalene !i-Chloroaniline IHeiachlorobutadiene !4-Chloro-3-iethrlphenol 12-Hethrlnaphthalene iHeiac-hlorocrclopentadiene 12,4,6-lrichlorophenol !2.;,5-!richlorophtnol !2-Chloronaphthalene ;2-Nitroanihne !DnethrlpMhalate lAcenaphthrlene !.,i.-Dinitrololuenc 13-Nitroaniline 12,4-Dinitrophenol !4-Nitrophenol IDiben^olui an !2,4-Dinitrotclu(ne !DiethrlPhthalate 14 Chlorophenjl-phenr lether '.Fluorene 14-Nitruaniline !4,ti-Dinitr(i-2-iethi>lphenol ;»-NUroioJiphtnrlo«inr III 5P-I ESP 01 tr 704 soil 1400 1700 150 J SP-2 E5P-02 61 710 soil 3100 2SOO 89 J ISO J SP-3 esp-os 11 711 soil 2000 2000 310 J ISO J r-.j i>. •H Tutu Uelllield. it. ThOMs. U.S. Virgin lilanji SeiivolatUt Organic* Analnlt of SoiU I In ug/kgl and MaUr lin ug/ll E5SO SOIL PILE ! PUP Location: ! Field Saiplt Nuibtr: ;CLP ICasf No. 10:61) Nuibtr: ! Halm; ;Htigchlorobrn2en( IPenUchlorophcnol !Ph(ntnthr(ne lAnthractnt IDi-n-tutrlchthilate IFluoranthtnt lP»rtnt IButribtnnlphthalsIf ll.J'-OichlorobenZKline ;Ben;o(alanthractnt IChDsene :t>lil2-Elh>lh<irllphthalatc ;Di-n-octrlphtr.al«tt IBenzoltiltluoriintntne ! Bfnzol klfluoranthene IBtnzololprrtne MndtnoU,2, J-cd)prrtnt IDiben/U.hlanthracenc !8rn{olg,h,i)p(rrltne ;uc's: U hrdroir-i-itthrl-2-pentan ;C3-Dfn:tn« isoitr ;c*-bfn;tnt isoitr IC10H12 isoitr ICS-benjtnt iso«r ll-fltthylnapthalene !C2-Napthaltnt isoicr :CIOM22 isoier 1C9M10 iso«fr :C2-btn:tnt isoierthrl-l^Cll Aliphatic hrdrocarcon :0tcane (8CISC1I HH-lndtnt, 2,5-dihrdro- 5P-1 ESP-Ol BY 70( soil UO J 2*0 J R 5000 J 3000 1 1100 J 1600 J 1100 NJ 790 J SP-: ESP-02 BY 710 soil 170 ] 95 J R 1600 J S200 ] (200 J 2(00 ) 1700 HJ 1600 J 1100 J ' 1100 NJ 2100 NJ SP-J ESP-OJ 11 711 soil 120 J 200 J R 9000 J 5300 J 2900 J 1(00 J UOO NJ 1200 J 1700 J Cr- Tutu UfllliflJ. St. [holds, U.S. Virgin Isldnds Ptstlcidt/PCB Anahsis of Soils lin uu/ljl and uaitrs (in ug/ll £550 SOIL PILE 1 PKP Location: ! FielJ Sdftulr Number: ! CLP 112058) NuiDcr: 1 natrii: lalPha-BHC ;t>fta-BHC Idflta-BHC leaMa BHC (Lindantl IHeptathlor lAldrin IHtottchlor tpoiidf lEndosullin 1 ;(,«'-ODE ! [nor in ifndosullan II Undoiultan iullate U.t'-DIil IflfthoircMor lEndrin kflonf lalpha-CMordane IganarChlordanc llouphrne IArochlor-1016 !Arochlor-l221 lArochlor-1212 IArochlor-1242 !Arochlor-l2(t !Arochlor-125t :Arochlor-12lO I10IAL PEST/PCBs SP-l E5P-OI BV 701 soil SP 2 E5P-02 8T 710 soil NO PESUCID 5P-J E5P-OJ IT 711 toil S OR PCBs D Field Blink E5P-fBJ X 701 yit*r TECIED lutu U c l l l l f l d , St. IhOiii, (l-i. Virgin Island* lotal Pttrolfui MrJrocarbon IIPHI Analysis (Soil in ug/g; Usttr in ig/ll ESSO SOIL PILE PRP Location: Field SaiD It NuiOfr: CLP ISAS 4S12B) Nuibcr: total Pttrolfu« HrJrocarbun 5P-1 ESP-01 45I26-7J 48 5P-2 CSP-02 4M26-74 134 5P-J E5P-OJ 45126-75 65 Field Hank E5P-F83 45128-72 U ig/1 Z ^ ^ ^ S S ^ ^ 5 2 c S. - " c 3 • -« • • ^ KJ E , '-^ b ^ S 30 3D "* cr 1 Nuibcr; i o» o-V o* & 30 Cf* • O £ ? *» 0 T •vj »vj 0 "^ 4 ?^ TUT OO1 0196 lutu Uelltields, it. Inoaas. U.S. Virgin Islands Volatile Organics Analrsis of Soils in ug/kg and Uater in ug/l. CSSO 1ANK tlCAVAUON 1 PUP Loci! ion: 1 Field SatPle Nuaoer: ! EPA Saaple Nuaoer: 1 natrii: 12-Butene Iflenjene, ll-iethflethrl)- IBenzene, proprl- IBenzene. l-propenrl IDiethtlbenzene isoier !Ben!<nc,2-ethrl-l,(-dii(th :Ben2(ri(,l,2,},S-t(triicthr !Ben2cnc,l,(-ditth>l- :H«pttn(,2,i-di>cthifl- ;Ben;fnt.l-tthrl-2-ifthrl !l,4-Crclohciadienc,]-ethnif iMrnnt. 2-itthr 1 ;HfOtant,3,5-diitth»l- ;2,J-Hfptadifn-5-»n*,2,4-di IBtnjtnt, ll, l-dlitthiltthrl !lthrldia(thylb(nt(nt isoaf inttnanr.truhlorotluoro- IPropant,2-«thoiir-2-«thrl ! B«nzene, 1.2,3- triifthrl- IBtnicne, 1,2,4-triiethrl- ;iH -indent, 2, J-dih»dro-5-af ;B«nzene,l-«thifl-5-proprl- ISutistitutcd bcnitnc ;((nztn(,l,2,«-trii(thyl- iBfnit'nt, 1-tlhtl- J.Vdiatth ;6tn!enf,l2-attNrlpropil)- indhanc.trichlorofluoro Benztnt, l-fthrnrl-2-ittHrl IP-I K-I-02 11 771 soil «700 N] 18000 NJ IP-3 It-I-01 IV 770 toil 150000 NJ 260000 NJ 260000 NJ 1000000 NJ 110000 NJ 210000 J IP-5 It-I-01 BY 76S toll 26000 NJ 26000 NJ 12000 NJ 20000 NJ 12000 NJ 13000 NJ IP-7 Tf-K-OS BY 773 soil 1100 NJ 1700 NJ 1100 J 1500 NJ 1100 NJ 1100 NJ IP-» U-X-06 BT 769 soil 1>0 NJ 190 NJ 100 NJ 11 NJ IP-il TC-l-04 BY 772 soil 45 NJ 21 NJ 51 NJ 45 NJ 40 NJ SI NJ 21 NJ IP-11 IE-I-040 BY 774 soil IP-12 IE-X-07 BY 775 toil 22 NJ 61 NJ 21 NJ 22 NJ 4.9 NJ 6.2 NJ 9.9 NJ 7.4 NJ Fltld Blank It-FBI BY 761 uater 24 NJ Field Blank IE-FB2 BY 761 vater 11 NJ Irip Blank It-111 BY 766 water 270 J Irip Blank IE-112 BY 767 water 270 J tutu uelllitld, St. Ihoaas, U.S. Virgin Islands Se»lvoletile Orginics Analysis of Soils (in ug/kgl and Hater (in ug/ll ESSO lAHH EKAVAUOK ; PUP Location: 1 Field SaiPle Nmtier: '.(.if (Case No. 10251) Kuiber: ! Nairn: IPhenol IbisU-CMoroethrllether 12-Chlorophenol !l,3-Dlchloroben2ene 11.4-Oithlorobeniene !6enirl alcohol !l,2-Dichloroben2(ne !2-nethrlphenol !bi si 2-CMoroisoprop 1 1 let her !l-nethrlphenol IN-Nltroso-dl-n-propylaiine IHeiachloroethane iNitrobenzene llsophorone !2-Nitrophenol !2,i-Diiethrlphenol IBenioic acid :bis(2-Chlorocthoir)iethane 12,4-Oichlorophenol 1 1,2,4 -Irichlorobtn: tne I Naphthalene 14-Chloroaniline IHeiachlorobutao'icne |t-Chloro-)-iethrlPhenol 12-nethHnaphthalene IHeiachloroirclopentadiene ;2,(,6-Trichlorophenol !2,O-Irichlorophenol ;2-Chloronaphthalcne !2-Nitroaniline IDiiethrlphthalate lAcenaphthylene !2,6-Dinitrotoluene 13-Nitroanillne lAcenaphthene 12,4-Oinitrophenol 14-Nitrophenol !Diben:oluran !2,4-Dinitrotoluene IDiethrlphthalate l*-Chloropheniil-phenirlelher !Fluorene !4-Nitroaniline i4,6-Oinitro-2-ieth» Iphenol ',N-Nitrosodiphtnrlaiine (1) |i-lro»ophtnrl-phenrl ether IP-5 IE-1-01 11 7t5 soil 5700 J 5000 330 J Field Blank !C-fB2 BY 761 viler IP-9 IE-I-06 tl 769 soil UOO 1600 130 J IP-J It-X-03 BT 770 soil 37000 J 27000 J 1100 J IP-1 1F.-X-02 BY 771 soil . 1100 1100 14 ] IP-11 U I Ot flr 772 soil IP-7 IE-X-05 BY 773 soil bOO 940 300 IP-11 IE-I-04D BY 774 soil IP-I: IE-I-07 BY 775 soil lulu Uellfield, SI. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands StilvoUlilt Or games Analrsis ot Soils (in ug/nl and Uittr tin ug/ll 0- ESSO UMH EICAVAIION I PRP Location: ! Field Saiple Nuiber: ICLP (Case No. 10258) Nuiber: 1 flatm: iHeiachlorobenzene IPentachlorophenol IPhenanthrene (Anthracene ;Di-n-Butrlphthalate IFluoranthene IPrrene IButrlbenzylphthalate !3,3'-Okhlorobenzidine IBenzolilanthracene !tiisl2-EthrlheiHlphth«late IDi-n-oct>lphthalate (Benzolbltluoranthene ! flenzo ( k I ( luoranthene IBenzolalprrene ; Indenol 1,2, J-cd|p»rene lOlbenzla.hlanthncene ;Benio(g,h,i)perrlene !UC's: !4-Hrdroiy-4-iethrl-2-pentin !C2-benzene isoier lAliphatk hydrocarbon !C3-benj.ene isoier 11 H-Indene, 2,'3-dihrdro !C4-benzene isoier 1C10H12 uoier !CS-ben;ene isoier !l-h>thrlnapthalene Undent ;C10H14 isoier IBiphenrl IC2-napthalene isoier IP-S IE-X-01 BY 765 soil 300 J SO J R 3400 J 1800 J 5700 J 4200 NJ 9100 J 2200 J 1700 J 2200 NJ Field Blank IE-FB2 BY 768 water 3 J IP-9 IE-K-06 BT 769 soil R 1900 J 3100 J 1700 J 1400 J 1400 NJ 1200NJ 1600J IP-3 IE-X-03 BY 770 soil 1100 J ISO J 260 J 21000 J 8300 J 8500 J 13000 NJ 14000 J 12000 J 9900 ) IP-1 IE-J-02 BY 771 soil R 1200 J 730 NJ 2300 J 540 J 660 J 660 J IP-11 IE-11-04 BY 772 soil 45 J R IP-7 IE-I-05 BY 773 soil 170 36 J R 540 J 2100 J 610 J 570 J 570 J 1300 J 540 J IP-11 IE-1-040 BY 774 soil R IP-12 IE-J-07 BY 775 soil 59 J R 11) ; cannot bt separated froi Diphenrlaiint lutu UelltielJ. St. Ihoias. U.S. Virgin Islands Pesticide/PCB Analrsis of Soils tin us/Hi and uaters lin ug/ll E5SO IANK ElCAVAIION ; PRP I0*.4l ICin: : FielJ iaiple Nuitier: ; (LP 1120581 »u»t>er. I natru: !aUtia-BHC Ibfla-BMC Idelta-BHC !ga*ia-BHC Ilindanel IHtptachlor lAldrin IHeptachlor epoude lEndosulfan 1 lOieldrin Xt'-DDE lEndrin lEndosullan II U.t'-DOD lEndosullan sulfate Incthoirchlor !Endrin ketone laipha-Chlordgne !idiia-Chlordint lloiaphene |Arochlor-l016 IArochlor-1221 lArochlor-1232 IArochlor-12(2 ,'Arochior-124« lArochlor-125* !ArocMor-1260 1IOIAL PESI/PCBs IP-1 IE-« 02 BY 771 soil • IP-3 IE-X 03 BY 770 soil IP-5 IE-X 01 BY 765 toil IP-7 It-X 05 BY 773 soil NO PESIICID IP-9 IE-X 06 BY 769 soil S OS PCBs D IP-11 ! £ - ( 04 BY 7?i IECIED IP-11 IE-1 U.d BY in s.ll IP-12 IE-X 07 BY 775 soil I-E-l BY 761 water Field Blank IE-FBI BY 7t,3 water Field Blank IE-FB2 BY 769 water lutu Uelltield. -A. Ihoias, lutu UellMeld, St. Ihoaas, U.S. Virgin Islands lots! Petroleui H>jrocarbun lotal Petroleui Hrdrocarbon (IPHl Analysis (Soil in ug/j; uater in u/ lioil in u«/4; U«ttr in ig/1) ESSO UNK CICAVAIION PRP location: Fit Id Sa»lt Nutbtr: CLP ISAS (M2BI Nuibtr: lotal Pttroltui Hrdrocarbon PIP location: Field Saiplt Nutber: CLP (SAS 4512BI lluibtr: lotal PttroUui Hydrocarbon T-E-1 IC-A-01 45121-60 it it/I IP-5 H-I-01 45128-61 69 IP-1 IE-I-02 45126-62 6i IP-3 IE-1-03 4512B-6) 2550 IP-11 lE-I-Oi (512B-64 II IP-7 tE-I-05 4512B-6I 63 TP-* TE-I-06 45I2B-69 39 IP-12 IE-X-07 4512B-70 (10 IP-11 IE-I-04D 45125-71 (10 Field Blank IE-FBI 45128-65 (1 10/1 Field Blank IE-FB2 45I2B-67 (1 i«/l lutu Uellfield, St. IhoMs. U.S. Virgin UUndi E.P. loiicm Anilriii of Soil in us/I £550 UNK EXCAVATION POP Location: Field 5aiple NuiDer: CLP 15*5 46586) Nuiber: Arsenic Bariui Cldilui Chronui Lead nercurir Seleniua Silver I-E-1 IE-A-01 46586-60 I 1100 II 46.0 J IP-b 1E-X-01 46586-61 2950 J 4.5 J II 20.0 J II IP-1 IE-X-02 46586-62 2690 J l.B J 1 4.4 ] IP-J IE-X-OJ 46586-6J J090 J J.9 ] ft 1S.O J IP-11 IE-X-04 4658B-64 2560 J 2.2 J 40 J IP-7 1E-X-05 46586-68 R 0.60 J t.l J IP-9 IE-K-06 46586-69 2590 ] 1.0 J (.9 J IP-12 IE-1-07 46588-70 I) 0.36 J IP-11 lf-1-Ot OUP 46586-71 1950 J }.2 I 1.0 J J.5 J Field llink IE-FBI 46586-65 1) R Field Blink IE-FB2 46586-67 R II IUIU UELLfltLO SAMPLE ;unn«R» LIST Of FPC SPLITS Of PRP iADPlES APRIL 27, 1990 HEPuRI CASE | 12058 45126 16)81 1 DATES lo/S-10/89 16/5-10/89 16/5-10/89 ; nAtmx ISOIL, AQ I50IL, AO 150IL, AO : CIP is !B(. 61, 6V I 45126 ! 46566 ! ANALYSES I VOA, Ell 1 IPH 1 EP 101 IPRPI LOCATION IEXACO STATION SOIL PILE SP-1, top SP-1, ltd SP-1, bot SP-1, COIP • * SP-J, top SP-J, lid 5P-3, bot SP-J, COIP • SP-5, top SP-5, nd SP-5, bot • SP-5, COIP • • Dup SP-5, top Dup SP-5, COIP • Field Blank fPC FIELO 1 SP2-OI1 SP2-012 5P2-013 5P2-011 SP2-01 * 5P2-021 5P2-022 SP2-023 5P2-02I 5P2-02 " SP2 031 5P2-OJ2 SP2-03J 5P2-03I SP2-03 • SP2-031D 5P2-03IO SP2-030 • SP2-FB2 CLP 1 BX 262 61 265 61 266 61 262 45128-10 45128-11 46586-12 61 263 6X 267 Bl 268 Bl 26} 4512B-1J 45126-14 46586-15 BX 264 BI 747 BI 748 61 264 45128-16 45126-17 4658-18 BT 749 BT 749 45126-21 45126-22 46586-23 81 758 8T 758 45126-24 46586-25 DATE 6/6/89 • • • • • 6/6/89 • • • • • 6/6/69 * * 1 • * ' 6/6/69 • • 6/6/89 • • MATRIX 1 ANALYSES ] ; SOIL IVOA IVOA IVOA IEXTRACIA6LES IIPH IIPH IEP TOI SOIL IVOA IVOA IVOA !E1IIACTA6LES IIPH IIPH IEP TOI SOIL IVOA IVOA IVOA IE1TRACTA6LES IIPH IIPH IEP IOX SOIL IVOA IEITRACIABLES IIPH IIPH IEP TOI AO IVOA lEXTRACTABLES ITPH IEP TOI TUTU SANPLE HASIER 1151 OF FPC SPLITS OF PIP SA APRIL 27, 1990 REPORT CASE I DA1ES I I1AIRIX CLP IS 12058 :6/5-IO/B9 ISOIL, AO IBI. 6X, BY 4512B 16/5-10/19 ISOIL. AO ; 4512B 46588 16/5-10/89 ISOIL, AO I 46588 (PUP) LOCATION ESSO STATION TANK EXCAV PIT IP-I • IP-5 * ' TP-5 * 1 TP-7 ' ' IP-9 IP-11 • IP-12 • • Oup, IP-11 • • Field Blank • ' FPC FIELD 1 IE-11-02 " ' 1E-X-03 * TE-X-01 ' * lt-X-05 • 1E-X-06 * * te-i-<K " ' TE-X-07 * ' IE-X-04D • • IE-FBI • IE-FB2 • CLP 1 BY 771 (6126-62 UStB-62 BY 770 4512B-6J 465JB-6J BY 765 45128-61 46586-61 BY 773 45126-6J 46518-68 BY 769 4512B-69 46588-69 BY 772 45128-64 4658B-64 BY 775 45128-70 46588-70 BY 774 45126-71 46588-71 BY 76J 4S12B-65 46586-65 BY 768 4S12B-67 46588-67 DATE 6/9/89 6/9/89 6/8/89 6/9/B9 6/9/19 6/9/89 6/9/89 6/9/89 6/8/84 6/9/69 nATRU SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL AO AO ESSO SOIL PILE 5P-1, lop SP-1, lid SP-1, 0(,d 5P-I, toip ESP-01I ESP-Oin EiF-OlB ESP-01 BY 702 BY 70} BY 704 BY 704 6/10/89 ' . SOIL •Wr f- 1UIU U[UFItl& SAHPLE suimARr IIASIER 115! OP fPC SPLITS OF PRP SA APRIL 27. WO DEPORT CASE I DATES CLP is 12058 16/5-10/89 ISOIL, AO !(T, BX, Bt 4512B 16/5-10/89 ISOIL. AO ! 4512B 4658B I6/5-10/B9 ISOIL. AO I U586 IPRPI LOCATION • SP-2. top 5P-2, lid 5P-2, bot SP-2. COIP * * SP-J. top 5P-J. lid SP-5. Dot 5P-3, COIP • • Field Blank • • FPC FIELD 1 • ESP-02I ESP-02H ESP-02B ESP-02 " * ESP-OJT ESP-03H ESP-OJ8 ESP-OJ * ' ESP-FBJ • • CLP 1 ttSBB-71 BY 70S BY 707 BT 70) BV 710 45128-74 U588-74 Br 711 BY 712 Br 71} BV 711 (S12B-7S 465J6-75 BY 701 45128-72 46586-72 DATE • 6/10/89 • • • * • 6/10/89 * ' * 6/10/89 • • IUIRU • SOIL * ' • * * SOIL * * 1 ' AO • • lulu at:iimil SttnPiE Su IMSItK LIST OF iHHr-LEb FMift H'4IE| Ltlltfc KEifU.Vc (4PKU 27, Wo ftEFOM lUUIiUtl ;U HE«h» [til iLEANEkS ; under i pile ot 1 aeons, trlV '.(inner me sj»e pile ; 01 oeoris, 15'1'4- d bouih 01 lust : borer.oie location aoove ; Field bunt ItEPI Ut llHJLAllOft ; llrui area ;5 to 12 inches deep Orui area ; brut area IKroouct in open oru* ; FiHa riant held blar.. Irip hUr,i :KAni,rt( ndijh LU. .Ne-t to oasset fence 'ii.ineo soil, ;-i." iUfthlHl MIC 1 Fro* nori-^otjQ.t Ifroi ocijOle t.'tri CASE 1 Iiu5« 4M.-8 46)66 FK FIELD 1 eO-vI'-ul *• eO-u.-u; • .0-U2-..3 • * eO-u.'-fbl • tl-v2-vtS • • eL-l'2-ii^'S " ,i-«:-*b * • eL-l'2-u4L ei-u.'-nib ei-u.-FH (L-l-i-Fr.1 ti.-o.-m tH-Vl">\3 ' e;t-". -i la jt-u;-;. OAIES 6/)- hi/89 6/)-lfr/89 6/5-1U/B9 CLP 1 bl 261 45128-112 bx :59 45li«-445 bl 256 4M.'f-7»6 465BB-9 8< 26U 4512S-19 BY 759 45lib-26 46588-26 6V 760 45i;<b-27 bi 761 br 761 451 ^-48 46?bb-i6 bl 991 11 992 IM 762 45K'b-29 4658b-29 bl 99ii bl 99! br <rj4 4M.f-4u 4c)bf-4o bi -*i< 4»"Sl Mlkll SUk, AO Suk, Ab SOU, AO OKIE 6/5/89 * b/5/89 • 6/5/U9 • • 6/5/89 • 6/6/89 • • 6/6/89 • 6/6/89 • 6/6/69 6/6/89 6/6/69 • 6'0/b9 6/6/69 6/n/oV • ail- 'Si 6 ' i 1 Bl CLP IS I ANALibtS bl, 81, br 1 VGA. til 45l2b 1 !Hi 465Bb 1 EP 101 •ftNlkll 1 AIDSES SOU IVOA. EllkACliibLES ;IPH SOU IVOH, EIIkAClHbiES IIPH SOIL IVOA, EilftAClHllLEb IIPM IEP 101 AO IVOA, EIlkAClAbLEb 1 1PH SOU IVOA, ElldACIAbLES * I TPH IEP 101 SOU IVOA, EllftACIAKEi lll-H SOIL IVOA ;1PH :EP lui AO ;vo« —— L SOU IVOA : AO IVOA. EllhHiliibLEb ;lPh IEP lui AU IVOA AO : vbH : iuk VUH, EilnHLUcub :iFh ;EP lui HU IVUrt, t lIK^L UbLt i> HJ :Vct4, cilnrtL Ut iti i CN c WOA: »01 43! mi: os 101 43! 101 43! "Hi: 'WJA: nos 101 43! mi: 'VOA; nos 101 43! 'DOA: nos ioi 43: 'WOA: nos 101 43! S3W1DIMIJ 'MA! 1105 IOI 43.' H4I! 'WOA! 110? 101 43: *»///« 4B/Z/9 IS* lit 944 {84 H Pi4 18 at, m 9/4 18 844 18 ft-88S9» £44 <8 It-MW fl^O-M-15* | IDS «nna ,q ubis (ours «cnq .?!-[ •fjjf panuai aoisu| /puts «o|aq .(,-; buii'uifiuo 101 43 113 'VOA '»<) '11 JIM n» 'nos w 'no? w 'nos 1 •)!] 1 dlJH 48/01-5/9 SI 41D IIHIVU "441 'i 1 3«»3 1SP nmi ATTACHMENT 1 Approximate Location of Soil Samples Collected Esso Tank Excavation Tutu Wellfield, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands June 8-10,1990 TP-10, TP-10A Excavation X Wall TP-11 X TE-X-04 TE-X-04D x TP-1 TE-X-02 x jP-2 x TP-3 TE-X--03 ' Tp_4 x Excavation Floor TP-5 TP-5A x TE-X-01 TP-6 x TP-7 TE-X-05 X Tp-8 X jP-9 TE-X-06 X X TE-X-07 X TP-V2T EXCAVATION PIT SP5 X sp-2 X SP-3 X SP-6 Soil samples (except VOAs) are vertical composites from top. middle and base. middle base SOIL PILE CDM Federal Programs Corporation TUT 001 0203 r i rI I I . CEIMIC y CORPORATION ••<-V"^> '•*& • '•'••' • . . < • • • > ' ". . "'..'-.:. -I'C.;*---:- .'.'•••.' .:". '••"Y'^'V'.V •V';v^.^''-..v'V: . - . • • > - • - - '"•'•^•'..jV-.';. ,-V;' :-V ^: ;- J'.?;-!;^'/.'-,<: •'••' - •':':'--:'--;!_-;^::'-"JlK',:'iV^'-''1-'>"'.-'- ••;•'' "-,:'''^:'' :':'.' :'. ^:''- ";•*•;&. f^ •^&$^^£$*^-'.^-':: r .^.OSEPA Contract, Lab Program••• ''.'v':^"l^•'••.-•- :'/ '-; Saaule Maniaa.=>in^n-h Of-f ^ ^o'''^.^-'/.'^-'';.-"'-. : ' • ' - . . :July,,18, 1989 , : Dear Program'"'Manager:''V^;]|-£-tv^^ : ; • ' • - ' -' •• ":'!;> ,w, V- •" ' • ' ; ; . . ' . ;".-'-^;"- !-" -; ^^ix^^vf-:'^.?- ••': ;K^V'.. : v ' ' . • : . " .: - • V Enclosed please find a data package and one floppy diskette for each of.the two SDGs.(BT747 and BX978) for the analysis of thirty, two soil samples.received at CEIMIC from Region II under Case .#12058 and performe'd."under contract 368D90028. /. - Please call if. you" have any questions regarding the data. Sincerely, .Kin S. Chlu ' "' Program Manager .cc. DSEPA EMSL-LV USEFA Region II 100 Dean Knauss Drive, Narragansett, R.I. 02882 • (401) 782-8900 • FAX (401) 782-8905 ' -,0 yf •tj'yy-':- ' - •' TUT ° 01 °209 CASE NARRATIVE i I I The enclosed data package is in response to EFA. Case #12053 and performed under Contract $ 6SD90028. These corresponded to 32 VGA, 23 SV and 2S Fest analyses (including the duplicate matrix spikes) originating from USEFA Region II and received at CEIMIC on June 13, 1989 via Federal Express. There are 2 SDGs in this case: ET747 and EX978. The data package included the analysis of samples""'' for SDG 3T747: EFA ID ANALYSIS -BT747 —— SDG VGA BT74S VGA BT749 VGA, SV, Fest cBX262 VGA, SV , Fest VGA, SV, Fest VGA, SV, Feet —•-8X265 VGA ^—BX266 VGA EX266MS VGA BX266KSD VGA —"EX267 VGA ^EX263 ' VGA .^5X976 • VGA, SV, Fest VGA, SV, Fest VGA VGA, SV, Fest BY759EE VGA BY759MS SV, Fest BY759MSD SV, Fest VGA, SV, Fest —— Last sample VGA, SV, Fest i i i i i i Tlie submitted data covers the analysis of the Volatile I (VGA), Seiaivolatile (SV) and Festicides/FCB (Fest) fractions and their associated blanks and QA/QC. CEIKIC would like to highlight the following points pertaining to the analyses performed for this case: I i < / ^i cf U(33 / TUT 001. 0210 I (1) INSTRUMENTATION AND COLUMN IDENTIFICATION I The following instruments are used for the analyses: | GC/MS ANALYSIS a. VOA S2 : column I MS2 : HP 5970B GC/MS using 6' x 2 mm ID SP-1000 packed I • column , b. SV I I MS3 : HP 5970B GC/MS using 6' x 2 ram ID SP-1000 packed MSI : HP 5970B GC/MS using 30 m x 0.25 mm ID DB-5 fused silica capillary column GC ANALYSIS GC1 : HP 5890 with ECD GC3 : HP 5890 with ECD a. Primary column: SP2100 6' x 2 mm ID glass column packed with 3% i SP-2100 on 100/120 Supelcoport (Supelco) I b. Confirnation column: 22502401 (2250/2401) 6' x 4 mm ID glass column packed with 1.5% . SP-2250/1.95 % SP-2401 on 100/120 Supelcoport I (Supelco) j (2) SAMPLE INFORMATION Duplicate matrix spikes were performed on BX266 for the VOA I fraction, and on BY761 for the SVOA and Pest fractions. A. Pest Fraction Surrogate recovery and retention time of several sample extracts were out of the limits. This is probably due to matrix interferences * as method blanks which were analysed with the sequence were all * """" within limits. " TUT OO1. O2.ll B. VGA Fraction Sample BY759 was reanalyzed to demonstrate matrix effects, The VGA reconstructed ion chromatograms are labeled as : IS-1 Eroroochloromethane IS IS-2 1,4-Difluorobensene IS IS-3 Chlorobensene-d5 IS S-l l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SS S-2 Toluene-d8 SS S-3 p-Bromofluorobensene SS C. SVGA Fraction: The SV reconstructed ion chromatograms are labeled as : » S-l 2-Fluorophenol SS S-2 Fhenol-d5 SS IS-1 l,4-Dichlorobensene-d4 IS S-3 Nitrobensene-d5 SS IS-2 Naphthalene-d8 IS S-4 2-Fluorobiphenyl SS IS-3 Acenaphthene-dlO IS S-5 Tribromophenol SS IS-4 Fhenanthrene-dlO IS S-6 Terphenyl-dl4 SS IS-5 Chrysene-dl2 IS IS-6 Ferylene-dl2 IS IS = Internal standard SS = Surrogate standard DEVIATIONS FROM THE SOW None TUT 001 0212 terms I I I I I I I I I i I I I I certify that this data package is in compliance with the and conditions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer-readable data submitted on floppy diskette has been authorised by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as verified by the following signature. Kin S. Chiu Program Manager "i UT OO1 0213 CASE NARRATIVE I I The enclosed data package ie in response to EFA Case » 12058 UOA Pffforned under Contract » 68D90028. These corresponded to 32 VOA, ±9 SV and 28 Pest analyses (including the duplicate matrix spikes) originating from tlSEPA Region II and received at CEIMIC °n ™13' 1989 via F«d«ral Express. There are 2 SDGs in this case: ET747 and BX978. BT The data Pa^age included the analysis of samples for SDG ID ANALYSIS 1 I I I I BT747 —— SDG VGA I . BT748 VGA I BT749 VGA, SV, Pest ^ BX262 VGA, SV, Pest • BX263 VGA, SV, Pest I BX264 VGA, SV, Pest 1 BX265 VGA BX266 VGA BX26GMS VGA BX266MSD VOA BX267 VGA I BX268 VGA I BX976 VGA, SV, Pest BX977 VGA, SV, Pest , BX992 VGA I BY759 VGA, SV, Pest 1 BY759FE VGA BY759MS SV, Pest I BY759MSD SV, Pest 1 BY760 VGA, SV, Pest BY761 —— Last sample VOA, SV, Pes-t ,„«. submitted data covers the analysis of the Volatile (VGA), Semivolatile (SV) and Festicides/PCB (Pest) fractions and I their associated blanks and QA/QC. CEIMIC would like to highlight the following points pertaining to the analyses performed for this caee: ftl 001 0214 " (1) INSTRUMENTATION AND COLUMN IDENTIFICATION f i The following instruments are used for the analyses: - GC/MS ANALYSIS a. VGA MS2 : HP 5970B GC/MS using 6' x 2 mm ID SF-1000 packed I column MS3 : HP 597OB GC/MS using 6* x 2 mm ID SP-1000 packed i column b. SV MSI : HP 5970B GC/MS using 30 m x 0.25 mm ID DB-5 I fused silica capillary column | GC ANALYSIS GC1 : HP 5890 with ECD | GC3 : HP 5890 with ECD a. Primary column: SP2100 ' 6' x 2 mm ID glass column packed with 3% SP-2100 on 100/120 Supelcoport (Supelco) I b. Confirmation column: 22502401 (2250/2401) j 6' x 4 mm ID glass column packed with 1.5% SP-2250/1.95 % SF-2401 on 100/120 Supelcoport (Supelco) (2) SAMPLE INFORMATION Duplicate matrix spikes were performed on BX266 for the VOA fraction, and on BY761 for the SVOA and Pest fractions. A. Peet Fraction Surrogate recovery and retention time of several sample extracts were out of the limits. This is probably due to matrix interferences as method blanks which were analysed with the sequence were all within limits. (,(**•• ... IUT 001 O215 I I i B. VGA Fraction Sample BY759 was reanalyzed to demonstrate matrix effects The VGA reconstructed ion chromatograms are labeled as : IS-1 Eromochlororoethane IS I IS-2 1,4-Difluorobensene IS IS-3 Chlorobensene-d5 IS S-l 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SS § S-2 Toluene-d8 SS I S-3 p-Bromofluorobensene SS I C. SVGA Fraction: The SV reconstructed ion chromatograms are I S-l 2-Fluorophenol SS S-2 Phenol-d5 SS IS-1 l,4-Dichlorobensene-d4 IS I S-3 Nitrobensene-d5 SS • IS-2 Naphthalene-d8 IS S-4 2-Fluorobiphenyl SS I IS-3 Acenaphthene-dlO IS S-5 Tribromophenol SS IS-4 Phenanthrene-dlO IS S-6 Terphenyl-dl4 SS IS-5 Chrysene-dl2 IS IS-6 Perylene-dl2 IS IS = Internal standard SS = Surrogate standard I • DEVIATIONS FROM THE SOW None I I I I - . L 7 ^ M*"5" TUT 001 0216 I t I I I f I I I i I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer-readable data submitted on floppy diskette has been authorised by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as verified by the following signature. Kin S. Chiu Program Manager i I I 001 0217 „ — (1) INSTRUMENTATION AND COLUMN IDENTIFICATION 1 The following instruments are used for the analyses: I * GC/MS ANALYSIS /' I V \ X &/ ' ' a. VOA \ < , <' MS2 : HP 5970B GC/MS using 6' x 2 mm^lD SF-lCfOO pacfc column 'VV "'^ "" I b. SV • MS3 : HP 5970B GC/MS using 6' x 2 mm I'D SP^IOOO packed column xs \. MSI : HP 597C1B GC/MS using 30 m x 0.25 mm ID DB-5 fueed silica capillary column I GC ANALYSIS | GC1 : HP 5S90 with ECD GC3 : HP 5890 with ECD I a. Primary column: SP2100 6' x 2 mm I'D glass column packed with 3% SF-2100 on 100/120 Supelcoport (Supelco) b. Confirmaion column: 22502401 (2250/2401) 6' x 4 mm ID glass column packed with 1.5% SP-2250/1.95 % SF-2401 on 100/120 Supelcoport (Supelco) (2) SAMPLE INFORMATION Duplicate matrix spikes were performed on BX984 for the VOA fraction, and on BY775 for the SVGA and Pest fractions. A. Pest Fraction The surrogate recovery and retention time were out of the limits for several of the sample extracts. This is probably due to matrix interferences as the method blanks which were analysed with the sequence were all within limits. TUT 001 0218 B. VOA Fraction The VOA reconstructed ion chronjatograws are labeled A IS-1 Browochloromethane IS IS-2 1,4-Difluorobenzene IS IS-3 Chlorobensene-d5 IS S-l l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SS S-2 Toluene-d8 SS S-3 p-Bromofluorobensene SS C. SVOA Fraction: The SV reconstructed ion chromatograros are labeled as S-l 2-Fluorophenol SS S-2 Fhenol-d5 SS IS-1 l,4-Dichlorobensene-d4 IS S-3 Nitrobensene-d5 SS IS-2 Naphthalene-d8 IS S-4 2-Fluorobiphenyl SS IS-3 Acenaphthene-dlO IS S-5 Tribromophenol SS IS-4 Phenanthrene-dlO IS S-6 Terphenyl-dl4 SS IS-5 Chrysene-dl2 IS IS-6 Ferylene-dl2 IS IS .= Internal standard SS = Surrogate standard DEVIATIONS FROM THE SOW None 70 /^ TUT 001 0219 1 certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer-readable data submitted on floppy diskette has been authorised by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as verified by the following signature. Kin S. Chiu Program Manager TUT 001 0220 CEIMIC CORPORATION SECOND REVISED SDG Cover Sheet Laboratory Name: Ceimic Corporation Contract Number: # 68D90028 Sample Analysis Price: $ 737 Case Number: # 12058 SDG Number BT747 - first sample received BT748 BT749 BX262 BX263 BX264 BX265 BX266 BX266 MS BX266 MSD BX267 BX268 BX976 BX977 BX992 BY759 BY759 MS BY759 MSD BY760 BY761 - last sample received Date of Receipt 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/10/89 6/10/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 6/8/89 H H 100 Dean Knauss Drive, Narragansett, R.I. 02882 • (401) 782-8900 • FAX (401) 782-8905 IT, 153 I I CEIMIC CORPORATION SECOND REVISED SDG Cover Sheet Laboratory Name: Ceimic Corporation Contract Number: # 68D90028 Sample Analysis Price: $ 737 Case Number: # 12058 SDG Number Date of Receipt BX978 - first sample received 6/10/89 BX983. 6/10/89 BX984 6/10/89 BX997 6/10/89 BX998 6/10/89 BY704 6/13/89 BY710 6/13/89 BY711 6/13/89 BY765 6/12/89 BY769 6/12/89 BY770 6/12/89 BY771 6/12/89 BY772 6/12/89 BY773 6/12/89 BY774 6/12/89 BY775 6/12/89 BY775 MS - 6/12/89 BY775 MSD - last sample received 6/12/89 160 TUT 001 0222 100 Dean Knauss Drive, Narragansett. R.I. 02882 • (401) 782-8900 • FAX (401) 782-8905 73 £ I I I SOP NO. HW-6 Revision #6 CLP ORGANICS DATA REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY REVIEW ODNCURRED BY: - / ~-^~ Date; is -B^vilacgua C Monitoring Management Branch APPROVED BY: /LpUt*JJr ' H^C— —_______________ Date:, Gerard F. McKenna, Chief Monitoring Management Branch I I TUT ooi o; STAMPED OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 3 of 36 " Date: March 1989 Revision 6 "PACKAGE COMPLETENESS AND DELTVERABIZS CASE NUMBER:. LAB: ; ; -- SITE: —•• —• _____________________ 1.0 Data Corpleteno^s and Deliverables YP^ NO N/A 1.1 Have any missing deliverables been received and added [ -x 1 __ __ to the data package. ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittal of any missing deliverables. If lab cannot provide them, note the effect on review of the package under the "Contract Problens/Non-carpliance" section of reviewer narrative. 1.2 Was s:.o CCS checklist included with package? f • ] __ __ n n rover Letter/Case Narrative 2.1 Is the Narrative or Cover Letter present? f ^ 1 __ __ 2.2 Are Case Number and/or SAS number contained in the / ^ Narrative or Cover Letter? f * 1 __ __ 3.0 Data Validation Checklist The following checklist is divided into three parts. Part A is filled out if the data package contains any VQA analyses, Part B for any BNA analyses and Part C for Pesticide/PCBs. Does this package contain: VQA data? ••' __ BNA data? _^_ __ Pesticide/PCB data? -: __ ACTION: Complete corresponding parts of checklist. I I I TUT 001 O224 -7 C - I STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 4 of 35 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO PART A: VDA ANALYSES 1.3 Are the Traffic Report Forms present for all samples? ACTION: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing or illegible copies. 1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any problems with sample receipt, condition of saaples, analytical problems or special notations affecting the quality of the data? ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the effect on the quality of the data. Acno;.': If any sample analyzed as a soil contains more than 50% water, all data should be rejected. A7.ru:- If both VOA vials for a sample have air bubbles, flag all positive results "J" and all non -detects" "R". N/A _ _ f - I _ _ 2.C Tunes 2.1 Have any VOA holding times, determined from date of collection to date of analysis, been exceeded? If unpreserved, aqueous aromatic volatiles must be analyzed within 7 days of collection and non-aromatic volatiles must be analyzed within 14 days. If preserved with hydrochloric acid and stored at 4°C, then both aromatic and non-aromatic volatiles must be analyzed within 14 days. If uncertain about preservation, contact the sampler to determine whether the sasples were preserved. A ten-day holding time for soil samples is recommended. Table of H o l n Tme Violations Sample Sample Matrix Preserved ? (See Traffic Report) Date Date lab Sampled Received Date Analyzed i- / / •'• i-t- ACTION: If holding times are exceeded, flag all positive results as estimated ("J") and sample quantitation limits as estimated ("UJ"), and document in the narrative that holding times were exceeded. TUT 001 r/ (7 X r. -T, P. . "-I : v , " -o \ r r. ( c- • •o Cr- STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 5 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 " YES NO N/A If analyses were done more than 14 days beyond holding time, either on the first analysis or upon reanalysis, the reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the reliability of the data and the effects of additional storage on the sample results. The reviewer may determine that non-detect data are unusable ("R") . 3.0 Surrogate Recovery fFom . 3.1 Are the VQA Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II) present for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water [ __ ] __ _/ b. Med water [ __ ] __ J/ c. Low Soil [ _ _] __ __ d. Med Soil [ __ ] __ _^L 3.2 Are all the VOA sarples listed on the appropriate Surrogate Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water [ __ ] __ J^L. b. Med Water [ __ ] __ _u/ c. Low Soil f 1 __ __ d. Med Soil [ __ 3 __ _^ ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittals. If missing deliverables are unavailable, document effect on data under "Conclusions" section of reviewer narrative. 3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? [ •/ ] __ __ ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. 3.4 Was one or more VQA surrogate recovery outside of contract specifications for any sanple or method blank? /_ If yes, were sables reanalyzed? r / 1 Were method blanks reanalyzed? [ __ ] ACTION: If surrogate recoveries are > 10% but all do not meet SCW specifications: 1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J") . 2. Flag all non-detects as estimated detection — limits ("UJ"). •TUT OOi <-''- i OPEEATUG PROCEDURE Page: 6 Of 36 I Date: March 1989 * Revision 6 NO N/A If any surrogate has a recovery of <10% : 1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J"). 2. Flag all non-detects as unusable ("R"). Professional judgement should be used to qualify data that have method blank surrogate recoveries out of specification in both original and re- analyses. Check the internal standard areas. 3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw data and Form II? __ [ ./] __ ACTICN: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmitt.al, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". > £.tc;:. .Sfi;kes (Form IIJ)' 4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III) prrsmt? [ _(/_ ] •i.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water [_] b. Med Water [__] c. Low soil [_/J d. Med soil [__] ACTICN: If any matrix spike data are missing, take the action specified in 3.2 above. 4.3 How many \KA spike recoveries are outside QC limits? Hater soils .*.. •'•-r-?'/-7 '-/A out of 10 -: out of 10 4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits? Water Soils :- -7v ' '-'/A OUt Of 5 O OUt Of 5 t^/A- l£ •.<..--< «•-';':" ACTICN: If MS and MSD both have lessHchan 10% re- covery for an analyte, negative results for that analyte should be rejected, and positive results should be flagged "J". me above applies only to the sample used for the MS/MSD analysis. Use professional ...... ,,, ,q judgement in applying this criterion to.other iuf ou camnloc in +'ho rv»r-Varro SIWSBARD OPE31A3ING PROCEDURE Page: 7 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A~ 5.0 Blanks (Form IV) 5.1 Is the Method Blank Summary (Form IV) present? [ ] __ 5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil, medium soil), whichever is more frequent? [ v \ ___ 5.3 Has a VCR instrument blank been analyzed at least once every twelve hours for each OC/MS system used? [ •••' ] . _. AClKlv. If any method blank data are missing, call lab for explanation / resubmittal. If not available, reject all associated positive data ("R"). j.4 Chrcrratography: review the blank raw data - chromatograms (RICR), quant reports or data system printouts and spectra. js ..he chromatographic performance (baseline stability) for each instrument acceptable for VQfts? [ \,' ] __ ACnCK: Use professional judgement to determine the effect on the data. 6.0 Contamination NOTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are validated like any other sample and are not used to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the other QC blanks discussed below. 6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive results (TCL and/or TIC) for VCAs? When applied as described below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution Factor. y I__] 6.2 Do any field/trip/rinse blanks have positive \KA results (TCL and/or TEC)? __ [__) _- ACTION: Prepare a list of the samples associated with each of the contaminated blanks. (Attach a separate sheet.) I NOTE: Oily field/rinse blanks taken the same day as the samples are used to qualify data. Trip I blanks are used to qualify only those samples I -—' with which they were shipped. Blanks may not be qualified because of contamination in another blank. Blanks may be qualified for surrogate, 1 spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems. TUT °01 CSSAKICS 9LAXK CO.TAMJNAT1CNJ CASc: - - - SITE: - ..,r-u. LAB: . - FSACriCW: ANAITTES 1 TCL 4 . . l'.i>\'. .,-.-, - ->' '-»<• *-',,W.^,; ^ •' | V . , • — " I / ' • • ,. . _ ' • . - ' •'••-. K* ; • i u.'^e^^-*-- TIC ^ ^ 1 :< :•-, ^j. (.- '. i-V<'r ,-t- 1 1 1 1 1 AFFECTED SAMPLES ME7HCO SL*Hf CCNTAXINAI ICNS 10 ••:<3-;'.' 10 •-- ;-.- AMOUNT / • "- '/ \ ^-V {' i 1 cT" . "^ *• x -:/T<"- ?r/,.: '— . *•' ' AMOUNT •~ ' $ A.- ,'- 10!-- . » ^ AMOUNT t0.-v . 10 't - •' AMOUNT - - R ,'-••' ''-? -^r.-7.> ^r-w^: " * / . * ' , > L k Cv. NO:,,- .- AMOUNT -«i^. *-**2 NO: AMOUNT TRIP BLAS'K CCS'T. - j NO: AMOUNT - NO: | AMOUNT | 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CCNTAMIMATICNS CASH: . -•- SITE: - - LAB: i ; . ; - . - C FSACTICN: ANALYTcS TCL I-' , •"•;•'.", <_ /'"• •'• ,~.Kl".'>"i ; , cV//..% .>«;a. )lt ^ .'•''- • • .-.,-..,.——. ,T ; •'l'»---i ->•., ;/ - •' ' .'••fttllfl t i '.' L.' ' M l.^— ,''L'r_ rr^-J~u,rf'\t- i)''-t"- •L'i-.Uu'.-v..,.. TIC /_ ' 1 1 1 1 AFFECTED SAMPLES "ETHCO SU.'iK CCNTAXI NAT IONS 10/V---X- AMOUNT -r' _^ -. i-,f. lr.\' ?*>'.>"•' :\ nc i i j^ ; l^c:-; ^':.^f'4\ io£- '-•''• AMOLKT T '.<;. 1 O A o -; -^. / -•• /- '. /T' to AMOUNT 10 AMOUNT - RINSE BLAKK CCKT. NO: AMOUNT •• NO: AMOUNT TRIP BLAWK CCST. \ NO: AMOUNT — » NO: | AMOUNT | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 02- TUT OO1 O231 * STANC&RD OPERATING PROCLDUHi. Page: 8 . of 36 s Date: March 1989 Revision 6 t —————.—_—.____________________________________ VES NO N/A ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify -— TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest value from all the associated blanks. .'Sample cone > CRQL!Sanple cone < CRQL &jSanple cone > CRQL ' but < lOx blank is < lOx blank value value & >10x blank value Methylene chloride Flag sanple result,1 Reject sanple result [No qualification 2-butanone ' ' Acetone {with a 'U'; cross and report CRQL; {is needed Toluene out 'B' flag cross out 'B1 flag .'Sample cone > CRQL [Sanple cone < CRQL &! Sanple cone > CRQL [but < 5x blank Jis < 5x blank value value & > 5 blank value Other Flag sanple result Reject sanple result No qualification •"ontarinants with a 'U'; cross and report CRQL; is needed out 'B1 flag cross out 'B1 flag .'•*> I I I ^<- i____________i______________i_________________i ACTION: For TIC compounds, if the concentration in the sanple is less than five tines the concentration in the most con- taminated associated blank, flag the sanple data "R" (unusable). 6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every sanple? [__] ^ __ ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank. Deception: samples taken from a drinking water tap do not have associated field blanks. 7.0 GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration (Form V) 7.1 Are the GC/MS Tuning and Mass calibration Forms (Form V) present for Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)? [__] __ __ 7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge (m/z) listing for the BFB provided for each twelve hour shift? [__) __ __ 7.3 Has a tuning performance corpound been analyzed for every twelve hours of sanple analysis per instrument? [ 's 1 __ _. ACTION: If any tuning data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ACTION: List date, time, instrument 10, and sanple analyses for which no associated GC/MS tuning data are available. TUT 001 023i 1MANDARD OPERATING FROCHX'Kh Page: 9 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A ————— ————— aa^^iiMjiiuiA - ,or»i-i£-j_t, nuu-ini irwj 1 —————————————————————— j ——————————————————————— ————————————————————— I ——————————————————————— —————————————————————— 1 ——————————————————————— ACTION: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration interval. 7.4 Have the ion abundance criteria been net for each instrument used? ACTION: List all data which do not meet ion abundance criteria (attach a separate sheet) . ACTION: If tuning calibration is in error, flag all associated sample data as unusable ("R") . However, if expanded ion criteria are net (See 1988 Functional Guidelines) , the data reviewer may accept data with appropriate qualifiers. 7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors between mass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least two values but if errors are found, check more.) 7.6 Have the appropriate number of significant figures (two) been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors are found check more values.) ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resutsnittal , make necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". 7.7 Are the spectra of the pass calibration compound acceptable? ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine whether associated data should be accepted, qualified, or rejected. 8,1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I VOA) present with required header information on each page, for each of the following: a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates c. Blanks LJJ _ — 'TUT OO1 O2 3.3 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 10 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 " YES NO N/A 8.2 Are the VGA Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, the ^ mass spectra for the identified compounds, and the data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in the sample package for each of the following? J^ /r a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate [__] ^ __ b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates f •.- 1 __ __ (Mass spectra not required) c. Blanks L_iJ __ __ ACTION: If any data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. 8.3 Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report? [__] '•' __ 6.4 Is chromatograpnic performance acceptable with respect to: Baseline stability [ -'] __ __ Resolution [ -•'.] __ __ f Peak shape f ^ 1 __ __ Full-scale graph (attenuation) [_i_] __ __ ' ^ Other:_________________ ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the i acceptability of the data. 8.5 Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the '' identified VQA compounds present for each sample? [__] _^_ ACTION: If any mass spectra are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. If Lab does not generate their own standard spectra, make note in "Contract Problems/Non-compliance". 8.6 Is the RRT of each reported compound within 0.06 RRT / units of the standard RRT in the continuing calibration? f • 1 __ __ 8.7 Are all ions present in the standard mass spectrum at a relative intensity greater than 10* also present in the sample mass spectrum? [_;_] __ __ ' 8.8 Do sample and standard relative ion intensities agree within 20%? [_^_] __ __ I ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine acceptability of data. If it is determined that incorrect identifications were made, i ^— all such data should be rejected, flagged "N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of the compound) or changed to not detected (at the calculated detection limit). * TUT 001 0234 Page: 11 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES .NO N/A 9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Form I, Part B) present; and do listed TICs include scan number or retention tine, estimated concentration and "J" qualifier? 9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified compounds and associated "best match" spectra included in the sample package for each of the following: a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate b. Blanks ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ACTION: Add "J" qualifier if missing and "N" qualifier to all identified TIC compounds on Form I, Part B. "< T »jre any TCl compounds (frcn any fraction) listed as •JTC compounds (example: 1,2-dimethylbenzene is xylene— a VGA TCL—and should not be reported as a TIC)? ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC. 9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the sample mass spectrum? 9.5 Do TIC and "best match" standard relative ion intensities agree within 20%? - ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine acceptability of TIC identifications. If it is determined that an incorrect identi- fication was made, change identification to "unknown" or to some less specific identi- fication (example: "C3 substituted benzene") as appropriate. 10.0 Cmnjuund Q*iar|^itation and Re 10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in Form I results? Check at least two positive values. Verify that the correct internal standard, quantitation ion, and RRF were used to calculate Form I result. Were any errors found? 10.2 Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions and, for soils, sample moisture? (V\,f\u- i -• yijT OO1 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 12 of 36 - Date: March 1989 Revision 6 " Y E S N O " N/A ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / - resubmittal, cake any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". ACTION: When a sample is analyzed at more than one dilution, the lowest CRQl£ are used (unless a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis). Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration range in the original analysis by crossing out the "E" value on the original Form I and substi- tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted sample. Specify which Form I is to be used, then draw a red "X" across the entire page of all Form I's that should not be used, including any in the summary package. II..1) Standards Data fGC/KST .1.1. ^re the Reconstructed Ion Chronatograjiis, and data systen printouts (Quant. Reports) present for initial ?-nrj continuing calibration? f ,."\ __ __ ACTICN: If any calibration standard data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. I J ,0 GC/MS Initial Calibration /Form VI) 12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present and complete for the volatile fraction? ALTXUH: If any calibration standard forms are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. 12.2 Are response factors stable for volatiles over the / concentration range of the calibration (RSD <30*)? [__] __*' __ ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: When RSD >30%, non-detects may be qualified using professional judgement. Flag all positive results "J". When RSD >90%, flag all non-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region II policy.) 12.3 Do any compounds have a RRF < 0.05? __ \v 1 __ ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: If any volatile compound has an average RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that compound as estimated ("J"), and flag non- detects for that compound as unusable ("R"). TUT 001 rnxA_cdJU«c, U OL. Date: March 1989 Revision 6 jo 12.4 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the reporting of average response factors (HRF) or %RSD? (Check at least two values but if errors are found, check more.) ' ACTION: Circle errors in red. ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubmittal , make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions" . YES N/A __ r -, 1 __ 13.0 GC/MS (Form VU) 13.1 Are the Continuing Calibration Forms (Form Vli) present and conplete for the volatile fraction? 13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed for every twelve hours of sample analysis per instrument? ACTION': List below all sanple analyses that were not within twelve hours of the previous continuing calibration analysis. [_ _ ] __ __ [ __ ] __ __ ACTION: If any ferns are missing or no continuing calibration standard has been analyzed within twelve hours of every sanple analysis, call lab for explanation / resubndttal. If continuing calibration data are not available, flag all associated sanple data as unusable ("R") . 13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard conpounds have a RRF < 0.05? ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: If any volatile conpound has a HRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that ccrpound as estimated ("J") , and flag non-detects for that compound as unusable ("R") . *•' [ __ ] __ 13.4 Do any caipounds have a % difference between initial and continuing calibration RRF > 25%? ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated sanple data as outlined in the table below: . ^ [ __ ] —— TUT 001 urxjvu. Apflj trrajt-tuuKt Fage: 14 or Date: March 1989 Revision 6 I I ___ YES NO N/A % DIFFERENCE 25-50 ' 50-90 ! >90 'J1 positive 'J' positive 'J1 positive (results, no action results, 'UJ' results, "R" ;for ncn detects non detects ' non detects .1. 13.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the reporting of average response factors (KRF) or difference (%D) between initial and continuing RRFs? (Check at / least two values but if errors are found, check more.) __ r •' 1 ACTION: Circle errors in red. t-TIOi:: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors urvte:: "Conclusions". ;' i u wsjijpi £-?ndards (Form VTII^ • '.j Are t:.e internal standard areas (Form VIII) of every sa'TJle a:x3 blank within the upper and lower limits / for •=•.=• ^ continuing calibration? [__] •/ ACTION: List all the outliers below. Sample I Internal Std Area Lower Limit Upper Limit 'i"! 1C (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the upper or lower limit, flag with "J" all positive results and non- detects (U values) quantitated with this internal standard. If extremely low area counts are reported, or if performance i exhibits a major abrupt drop off, flag all associated non- I detects as unusable ("R"). 14.2 Are the retention times of the internal standards within / I 30 seconds of the associated calibration standard? [^Lj — ACTION: Professional judgement should be used to qualify data if the retention times differ by more than 30 seconds. TUT 001 O238 STANDARD OPERATING FRXEDURE Page: 15 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 ~ " YIS JW N/A 15 . 0 Fisld 15.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for VQA analysis? ACTION: Conpare the reported results for field duplicates and calculate the relative percent difference. ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate results must be addressed in the reviewer narrative. However, if large differences exist, identification of field duplicates should be confirmed by contacting the sanpler. * TUT 00 J 90 ,^33 •' "• " DJ.ru•u-Tvrv^' ^rrjvio. .u'ttj r-KiJt-M »IKI- rayc. j.o ui. jo Date: March 1989 Revision 6 " YES NO N/A~ s_, PART B: SNA ANALYSES 1.0 Traffic Reports and Laboratory Narrative / 1.1 Are the Traffic Report Ferns present for all samples? LjL] __ __ ACTION: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing or illegible copies. 1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any problems with sample receipt, condition of samples, analytical problems or special notations affecting the quality of the data? __ r '<•' 1 __ ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the effect on the quality of the data. ACTION: If any sarple analyzed as a soil contains more than 50% water, all data should be rejected. 2 '", Holding Tines 2.1 Have any BNA holding tines, determined from date of collection to date of extraction, been exceeded? __ [ V '] __ Sarples for BNA analysis, both soils and waters, must be extracted within seven days of the date of collection. Extracts must be analyzed within 40 days of the date of extraction. Table cf Holding Time Violations (See Traffic Report) Sample Date Date lab Date Date Sample Matrix Sampled Received Extracted Analyzed ACTION: If holding tires are exceeded, flag all positive results as estimated ("J") and sample guantitation limits as estimated ("UJ"), and document in the narrative that holding times were exceeded. ^ . . TUT 001 0240 -// ' __.«.___ »,»—.—. —-^ • '•"••» ^' • T"L .rdytJi j./ oi jo * Date: March 1S89 * Revision 6 I —————————~——————————^————————————————————————— If analyses were done more than 14 days beyond holding time, _ either on the first analysis or upon reanalysis, the reviewer I must use professional judgement to determine the reliability 1 of the data and the effects of additional storage on the sample results. The reviewer may determine that non-detect | data are unusable ("R"). i 3.0 Surrogate Recovery (Form II} 3.1 Are the ENA Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II) present for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water b. Med Water c. low Soil d. Med Soil 3.2 Are all the BNA samples listed Recovery Summaries for each of a. Low Water b. Med Water c. Low Soil d. Med Son on the appropriate Surrogate the following matrices: [_] _ [__3 _ _•/' ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmlttals. If missing deliverables are unavailable, document effect on data under "Conclusions" section of reviewer narrative. 3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? [_ ACTICW: Circle all outliers in red. 3.4 Were two or more base-neutral OR acid surrogate recoveries out of specification for any sample or method blank? If yes, were samples reanalyzed? [__] __ > Were method blanks reanalyzed? [__] __ ACTION: If all BNA surrogate recoveries are > 10% but two within the base-neutral or acid fraction do not meet SCW specifications, for the affected fraction only (i.e. base-neutral OR acid compounds!; 1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J"). 2. Flag all non-detects as estimated detection limits ("UJ"). T OO1 0241 STWCPiRD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 18 of 36 f Date: March 1989 Revision 6 I s-' YES NO N/A If any base-neutral or acid surrogate has a recovery of <10% : . 1. Flag all positive results for that fraction (i.e. all acid or base-neutral compounds) "J". 1 2. Flag all non-detects for that fraction "R". Professional judgement should be used to qualify data that have method blank surrogate recoveries out of specification in both original and re- analyses. Check the internal standard areas. 3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw / data and Form II? __ t •/ ] __ Amen- If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resutmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". ligti i..t Spikes (Form III) c -1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III) / preser^? [ __/] __ 4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water [__] __ b. Med Water [ 1 __ c. Low Soil [_/] __ __ d. Med Soil [_] _ j/_ ACTION: If any matrix spike data are missing, take the action specified in 3.2 above. 4.3 How many EWk spike recoveries are outside QC limits? Water Soils out of 22 /"-f out of 22 . 4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spike and matrix spike I duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits? Water Soils •;:>•• M^-wr N>M out of 11 3 out of 11 I ACTICN: If MS and MSD both have less than 10% recovery '^ for an analyte, negative results for that analyte should be rejected, and positive results should be flagged "J". Ine above i applies only to the sample used for MS/MSD analysis. Use professional judgement in ,-— ~{ t « r Ooi 0242 eamnloc '•*• u' - 1U' '-'"'' STAMPED OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 19 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A 5.0 Blanks (Form IV) b.l Is the Method Blank Sunmary iroiin iV) present? [ v\ 5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of ENA TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil, medium soil), whichever is more frequent? [_^_] __" __ 5.3 Chroma tography: review the blank raw data - chromatograms (RICs) , quant reports or data system printouts and spectra. Ts *h° rftromatographir performance (baseline stability) >• n instrument accepc^ble for JOa? [ - ] —— ^ '-Ti- Use professional judganent to determine the effect on the data ContaiTu nation MDTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are validated like any other sample and are not used to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the other QC blanks discussed below. 6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive results (TCL and/or TIC) for ETAs? When applied as described below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution Factor. •'' t __ ] _ 6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive ETA results (TCL and/or TIC)? __ [ __ ] ACTION: Prepare a list of the samples associated with each of the contaminated blanks. (Attach a separate sheet. ) NOTE: Only field/rinse blanks taken the same day as the samples are used to qualify data. Blanks may not be qualified because of contamination in another blank. Blanks may be qualified for surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems. CSiANlCS BLANK CCNTAMINATICNI CASE: S I T E : IA8: -" : •' F S A C T J C N : -- • 1 | ANALTTES 1 1 TCL 1|. .................. I.................... 1.................... 1 1—— —— —— —— —— "" 1|... ................ ! ..................... 1j..... ............... 1 1——————— — — 1..................... j ——————————— 1 TIC |-...~- ............. w . .;.... yi < / ••-'.'• t if - l-t: • •'•- *^ - t^,-U 'l"j< ...... .'.iij-.-'rt...... '— .' ...,,.-„ 1 1 1 1 1 ArrECTEO SAMPLES IMETHCO BUNK ccNTAxiwAncNs «o*ir/- AMOUNT • e <-; -i ,'c .-jt :?"/' O.C'''.? -s/' -'•'^ r f si " t -"! • I^IIM y 10 /•'/:- ANOLMT • v "T; 75- .yvt-<<- ' W> T ) '.^ /"/<• "','/ >?:_> H74-V j.'7.;.'c.. r 7/7 .t."2.;.i.., r77? ^r ~) '/'+ ID AMOUNT . ID AMOUNT - RINSE BLASK CCIiT. NO: AMOUNT « • NO: AMOUNT TRIP BLAMK CCWT. | NO: AMOUNT x.^. >•-.- — » NO: | AMOUNT | I 1 I 1 1 JL. ........ 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TUT 001 0244 BLA« CCKTAMIWATICHI CASH: . ' ; s ; SITE: ',',, v-t, LAB: <: < ANALTTES TCL TIC ' "- • i_ .. /-; A/ • „- / 1 • ^ , , ,,rc_^ I 1 1 1 1 1 AFFECTED SAMPLES IKETHCO 3LA« CCWTAMIWATICHS 1 0^/'-<V AMOUNT 10 AMOUNT ::: V-x//r •i; ,-',«;- •-" * ii.- - J> i'li' S/Jt.-«. !5xfi7L C<r'/ ?•• jr-7^7 ^r-c-r iir-7^/ 10 AMOUNT 10 AMOUNT • R1MSE BLANK CCNT. NO: AMOUNT •• NO: AMOUNT TRIP B:A« CC-.-T. NO: AMOUNT -» NO: AMOUNT 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TUT O01 0-245 (JfJLKrti jj^u i-WUCLDURE «ige: m or 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest value from all the associated blanks. YES NO N/A Common Phthalate Esters Other Contarninants Sample cone > CRQLj but < iox blank Flag sample result with a 'U'; cross out 'B1 flag -i ——— . ——————— i [Sample cone > CRQLj but < 5x blank Flag sairple result with a 'Uf; cross out 'B1 flag i ... . i Sanple cone < CRQL & is < lOx blank value Reject sample result and report CRQL; cross out 'B1 flag Sanple cone < CRQL & is < 5x blank value Reject sample result and report CRQL; cross out 'B' flag : Sanple cone > CRQL value & >10x blank value No qualification is needed 1 j Sanple cone > CRQL value & > 5 blank value No qualification is needed 1 i ACTION: For TIC corpounds, if the concentration in the sample is less than five times the concentration in the most con- taminated associated blank, flag the sample data "R" (unusable). Are there field/rinse/eguipment blanks associated with every sample? [__] ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank. Exception: samples taken from a drinking water tap do not have associated field blanks. 7.0 GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration (Form VI 7.1 Are the GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration Forms (Form V) present for Decafluorotriphenylphosphine (DFTPP)? 7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge (m/z) listing for the DFTPP provided for each twelve hour shift? 7.3 Has a tuning performance compound been analyzed for every twelve hours of.sample analysis per instrument? ACTION: If any tuning data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ACTION: List date, time, instrument ID, and sample analyses for which no associated GC/MS tuning data are available. [_] _ _ ? TUT OO.1 0246 STANEPiRD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 21 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A ESVTE TIME INSTRUMENT SAMPLE NUMBERS ACTION: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration interval. 7.4 Have the ion abundance criteria been met for each / instrument used? [ ./ ] ACTION: List all data which do not meet ion abundance criteria (attach a separate sheet). 2CTION: If tuning calibration is in error, flag all associated sample data as unusable ("R"). However, if expanded ion criteria are met (See 1988 Functional Guidelines), the data reviewer may accept data with appropriate qualifiers. 7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors between mass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least two values but if errors are found, check more.) __ 7.6 Have the appropriate number of significant figures (two) been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors are found check more values.) __ ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions11. 7.7 Are the spectra of the mass calibration compound ,' acceptable? [ >/ ] ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine whether associated data should be accepted, qualified, or rejected. 8.0 Target Compound List (T(X) PVTriXytiSR 8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I BftfV) present with required header information on each page, for each of the following: a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate ^—-) b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates [ y_ ] c. Blanks [ J\ t/1 STANDARD OPERATED PROCEDURE Page: 22 of 36 -Date: March 1989 Revision 6 Y E S N O N / A 8.2 Are the ENA Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, the mass spectra for the identified compounds, and the data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in the sample package for each of the following? a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate f / ] __ __ b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates [_k_J __ __ (Mass spectra not required) c. Blanks f •/ 1 __ __ ACTION: If any data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. 8.3 Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report? [__] • __ 3.4 Is chromatographic performance acceptable with respect to: Baseline stability [____] __ __ Resolution [___] __ __ Peak shape f -- 1 __ __ Full-scale graph (attenuation) [ - 1 __ __ Other:________________ [__] __ _^ ~^——s j ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the I acceptability of the data. 8.5 Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the / identified BNA compounds present for each sample? [_'_] __ __ ACTION: If any mass spectra are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. If Lab does not generate their own standard spectra, make note in "Contract Problems/Non-compliance". 8.6 Is the PRT of each reported compound within 0.06 PRT units of the standard PRT in the continuing calibration? f / 1 __ __ 8.7 Are all ions present in the standard mass spectrum at a relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the / sample mass spectrum? f J 1 __ —— i 8.8 Do sample and standard relative ion intensities agree / within 20%? [_/J __ __ I ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine acceptability of data. If it is determined that incorrect identifications were made, t all such data should be rejected, flagged ^ "N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of the compound) or changed to not detected (at , the calculated detection limit). * " ' TUT 001 0243 uf£j<A:r.LNG PROCEDUKt; Page: 23 or 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 I YES NO N/A ' "> Tentatively Identified Cunmuunds fTIC) 9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Form I, Part B) present; and do listed TICs include scan number or retention time, estimated concentration and "J" / qualifier? [_/_] __ __ 9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified compounds and associated "best match" spectra included in the sample package for each of the following: a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate r J1 __ __ b. Blanks [_J __ __ ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ACTION: Add "J" qualifier if missing and "N" qualifier to all identified TIC compounds on Form I, Part B. j 9. :< Are any TCL compounds (from any fraction) listed as I TIC compounds (example: 1,2-diroethylbenzene is xylene— / a VOA TCL—and should not be reported as a TIC)? __ f J 1 __ | ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC. 9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a 1 relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the sample mass spectrum? [__] __ __ 9.5 Do TIC and "best match" standard relative ion intensities agree within 20%? [__] __ __ ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine acceptability of TIC identifications. If it is determined that an incorrect identi- fication was made, change identification to "unknown" or to some less specific identi- fication (example: "C3 substituted benzene") as appropriate. • 10.0 CoiTound Quant i tat ion and Reported Detection) LJFU'tg 10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in Form I results? Check at least two positive values. Verify that the correct internal standard, quantitation ion, and RRF were used to calculate Form I result. / I Were any errors found? - [__] __ 10.2 Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions I and, for soils, sample moisture? ^^ TUT ooi °249 ..~.o r«JCEDL"RE Page: 24 of Date: March 1989 Revision 6 36 YES NO N/A ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / x_ resubnittal , make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". ACTION: When a sanple is analyzed at more than one dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher CRQL data from the diluted sanple analysis) . Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration range in the original analysis by crossing cut the "E" value on the original Form I and substi- tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted sanple. Specify which Form I is to be used, then draw a red "X" across the entire page of all Form I's that should not be used, including any in the summary package. 11.0 Standards Data (GC/WS) 11.1 Arc tlie .Reconstructed Ion Chrorarogrars, and data system printouts (Quant. Reports) present for initial and continuing calibration? ACTION: If any calibration standard data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. x-'V. 7 *) GC/K5 Calibration (Form 12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present and ccziplete for the BNA fraction? ACTION: If any calibration standard forms are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. 12.2 Are response factors stable for ENAs over the entration range of the calibration (RSD <30%)? ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: When RSD >30%, non-detects may be qualified using professional judgement. Flag all positive results "J". When RSD >90%, flag all non-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region II policy.) 12.3 Do any conpounds have a RRF < 0.05? ACTICN: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: If any BNA conpound has an average RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that conpound as estimated ("J"), and flag non- detects for that conpound as unusable ("R"). __ LiU __ TUT 001 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 25 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 Y E S F r o N / A 12.4 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the it-porting of average response factors (RRF) or •— %RSD? (Check at least two values but if errors are found, check more.) __ I '.'' 1 __ ACTION: Circle errors in red. ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and ncte errors under "Conclusions". 13.0 GC/MS Continuing Calibration fForm VIII 13.1 Are the Continuing Calibration Forms (Form VTI) present and complete for the BNA fraction? f -' 1 __ __ 13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed for every twelve hours of sample analysis per instrument? f - 1 __ __ ACTION: List below all sarple analyses that were not within twelve hours of the previous continuing calibration analysis. ACTION: If any forms are missing or no continuing calibration standard has been analyzed within twelve hours of every sample analysis, call lab for explanation / resubmittal. If continuing calibration data are not available, flag all associated sample data as unusable ("R"). 13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard compounds have a RRF < 0.05? __ ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: If any ENA compound has a RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that compound as estimated ("J"), and flag non-detects for that compound as unusable ("R"). 13.4 Do any compounds have a % difference between initial and continuing calibration RRF > 25%? '/ ; [__] —— ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated sample data as outlined in the table below: TUT OO1 O251 Page; 26 of 36 Date: March 1°°9 Revision 6 YES NO N/A % DIFFERENCE 25-50 ' 50-90 ' >90 ! •J' positive j'J' positive [ 'J1 positive .results, no action results, 'UJ 1 .results, "R1 "" for non detects ncn detects' non detects 13.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the reporting of average response factors (RRF) or difference (%D) between initial and continuing RRFs? (Check at / least two values but if errors are found, check more.) __ f - 1 __ ACTION: Circle errors in red. If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubnittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". • 11^ • >mal S* '^f^^rr^e. (Forr. 1 ' Are the internal standard areas (Forn VIII) of every 'Tuple and blank within the upper and lower limits :'-r t!2.ch continuing calibration? [__] ACTICN: List aU the outliers below. Sample # Internal Std Area Lower Limit Upper Limit (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the upper or lower limit, flag with "J" all positive results and non- detects (U values) quantitated with this internal standard. If extremely low area counts are reported, or if performance exhibits a major abrupt drop off, flag all associated nan- detects as unusable ("R"). 14.2 Are the retention tires of the internal standards within 30 seconds of the associated calibration standard? f ^ 1 __ __ ACTION: Professional judgement should be used to qualify data if the retention times differ by more than 30 seconds. rur OOl STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 27 of 36 i Date: March 1989 Revision 6 I Y E S 7 * 5 N / F 15.0 Field Duplicates I -- 15.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for ENA analysis? [j/J __ __ ACTION: Coipare the reported results for field duplicates and calculate the relative percent difference. ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate results must be addressed in the reviewer narrative. However, if large differences exist, identification of field duplicates should be confirmed by contacting the sampler. I I I TUT 001 0253 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 28 of 36 ' Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A PART C; PESTICIDE/PCS ANALYSES }.2 Are the Traffic Report Forms present for all samples? f /I __ __ ACTION: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing or illegible copies. 1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any problems with sample receipt, condition of samples, analytical problems or special notations affecting the quality of the data? __ [_^J __ ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the effect on the quality of the data. ACTION: If any sample analyzed as a soil contains more than 50% water, all data should be rejected. .Tines s.f Have any PEST/PCB holding times, determined from date of rr.VtH rim to date of extraction, been exceeded? __ f 1 __ Samples for PEST/PCB analysis, both soils and waters, must be extracted within seven days of the date of ^ collection. Extracts must be analyzed within 40 days of the date of extraction. 3.0 Surrogate Recovery (Form II) 3.1 Are the PEST/PCB Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II) present for each of the following matrices: a. Lew Water [__] __ _kl_ b. Med Water [__] __ _J/ c. Low Soil f /_] __ __ d. Med Soil [__] __ _±_ 3.2 Are all the PEST/PCB samples listed on the appropriate Surrogate Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water [__] __ _±L b. Med Water [__] __ ._itl c. Low Soil f v/J __ —— d. Med Soil [__] __ J/ TUT 001. 0254 STWIRRD (JFtHAHUG PROCEDURE Page: 29 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A ACTICN: Call lab for explanation / resutmittals. If missing deliverables are Unavailable, document effect on data under "Conclusions" section of reviewer narrative. / 3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? [ /1 __ __ ACTICN: Circle all outliers in red. 3.4 Was surrogate (EEC) recovery outside of the contract specification for any sample or blank? ^' t__] __ ACTIdJ: No qualification is done if surrogates are diluted beyond detection. If recovery is below contract limit (but above zero), flag all results for that sample "J". If recovery is zero, flag positive results "J" and non-detects "R". If recovery for the blank is zero, flag non-detects for all associated samples "R". If recovery is above contract limit, flag all positive results for that sample "J", unless in the reviewers professional judgement the high recovery is due to co-eluting interference (check the associated blank - if recovery is high there also, flag the sample data). 3.5 Are there any transcript ion/calculation errors between raw data and Form II? __ f ftCTICN: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". 4.0 Matrix Spikes (Form III) 4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III) present? [ '/ ] 4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water [__] b. Med Water [__ ] c. Low Soil [ ., 1 d. Med Soil I_1 __ ACTICN: If any matrix spike data are missing, take the action specified in 3.2 above. 4.3 How many PEST/PCB spike recoveries are outside QC limits? Water Soils .,;; /'~//i out Of 12 Cr OUt Of 12 •_-:<jfc>, f-- "••""< ''- ————— . uvp/~ 7 N-/A- ''< I0(f cru|^3 TUT 001 I/ SIN>£&RD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 30 Of 36 Date: March 1989 | . Revision 6 I YES NO N/A 4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits? Mater - _, ,-_ t . "* '^,-. /i/£ out of 6 -Vr/vr *-•'*> ACTION: If MS and MSD both have less than zero recovery for an analyte, negative results for that analyte should be rejected, and positive results should be flagged "J". The above applies only to the sample used for MS/MSD analysis. Use professional judgement in applying this criterion to other samples. J I 5.0 '^anks (Form IV) .'*> j • !=• tN> Method Blank Sunmary (Form IV) present? [_i_l J5* _ _ - j.i Frtquvn cy oi Analysis: for the analysis of Pesticide TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been nalyzM for each set of samples or every 20 samples of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil, / medium soil), whichever is more frequent? [ '/ ] __ _ 5.3 Chrcnatography: review the blank raw data - chromatograms , quant reports or data system printouts. Is the chromatographic performance (baseline stability) for each instrument acceptable for PEST/KBs? I 3 __ __ ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the effect on the data. 6.0 Contamination NOTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are validated like any other sample and are not used to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the other QC blanks discussed below. 6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive results for PEST/PCBs? When applied as described below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks / are multiplied by the sample Dilution Factor. __ t_^_] _ 6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive PEST/FCB results? ACTION: Prepare a list of the samples associated with each of the contaminated blanks. (Attach a separate sheet.) » TUT' 00 SlWCftRD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 31 of Date: March 1989 Revision 6 36 YES NOTE: Oily field/rinse blanks taken the same day as the samples are used to qualify data. Blanks may not be qualified because of contamination in another blan1'. Blanks may br qualified for surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems. ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest value from all the associated blanks. NO N/A I Sample cone > CRQL ! but < 5x blank Sample cone < CRQL & is < 5x blank value Sample cone > & > 5x blank value "'"•g sanple result •.Lh a "U"; cross ."1- «B" flag Reject sanr'e result and report CRQL; cross out "B" flag No qualification is needed re t samp1 field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every [ __ ] ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank. Exception: samples taken from a drinking water tap - do not have associated field blanks. 7.0 Perforation and GC Performance 7.1 Are the following Gas Chromatograms and Data System Printouts for both Primary and Confirmation (confirmation standards not required if there are no positive results above CRQL) column present: a. Evaluation Standard Mix A b. Evaluation Standard Mix B c. Evaluation Standard Mix C d. Individual Standard Mix A e. Individual Standard Mix B f. Multi-component Pesticides Tbxaphene & Chlordane g. Aroclors 1016/1260 h. Aroclors 1221, 1232, 1242, 1248, and 1254 ACTICN: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above U J (03 o TUT 001 0257 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 32 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 ————————————- — — — — — - - 7.2 Is FOOT VIII Pest-1 present and ccnplete for each GC column (primary and ccnf irration) and each 72 hour sequence of analyses? f , ] __ ACTION: If no, take acticn specified in 3.2 above. 7.3 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw data and Form VTII? __ [__] ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". 7.4 Has the total breakdown en quantitation or confirmation column exceeded 20% for DOT? __ [_J - for Endrin? __ [_^_] or if Endrin aldehyde and 4,4'-ODD co-elute and there is a pe^Jc at their retention tine, has the combined DDT and Endrin b. eakdown exceeded 20%? ATTCN: a. If DOT breakdown is greater than 20% on quantitation column beginning with the sarples following the last in control standard: 1. Flag all positive DOT results "J". 2. If DDT was not detected but DDD and/or DDE are positive, flag the DDT ncn-detect "R". 3. Flag positive DDD and DDE results "JN". 4. If DDT breakdown is > 20% on confinnation column and DDT is identified on quantitation column but not on confinnation column, use professional judgement to determine whether DDT should be reported on Form I (if reported, flag result "N"). b. If ESidrin breakdown is > 20% on quantitation column, beginning with the samples following the last in control standard: 1. Flag all positive Endrin results "J". 2. If Endrin was not detected, but Endrin Aldehyde and/or Endrin Ketone are positive, flag the Endrin non-detect "R". 3. Flag Endrin Ketone positive results "JN". 4. If Endrin breakdown is > 20% on confirmation column and Endrin is identified on quantitation column but not on confirmation column, use professional judgement to determine whether Endrin should be reported on Form I (if reported, flag result "N11). c. If the combined breakdown is used (it can only be used if the conditions in 7.4 above are met) and is > 20% on quantitation column beginning with the last in control standard, take the actions specified in 7.4 a and b above. If the combined breakdown is >20% on confinnation column and Endrin or DDT is identified on quantitation column but not on confirmation column, use professional judgement to determine whether Endrin or DDT should be reported on Form I (if reported, flag result "N"). TUT 001 0258 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 33 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A" 7.5 Is the linearity check PSD of all four calibration factors <10% for the quantitation column? f (/] __ __ ACTION: If no, flag positive hits for all pesticide and PCS analytes "J" for all associated samples. Do not flag toxaphene or DOT if they are quantified from a 3-point calibration curve. • 7 . 6 Is the % difference between the EVAL A and each analysis (quantitation and confirmation) DEC retention time within QC limits (2% for packed column, 0.3% for capillary [I.D. /fr < 0.32 mm], 1% for megabore [0.32 < I.D. < 2 mnj) ? [ __ ] / __ ACTION: DBC retention time cannot be evaluated if DEC is not detected. If it is present and has a retention tine out of QC limits, then use professional judgement to determine the reliability of the analysis and flag results "R", if appropriate. '. " Was the proper analytical sequence followed for each / 72 hour period of analyses (page PEST D-36 in 8/87 SCW) . [ ./] __ __ ACTION : If no, use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect on the data and accept or reject it accordingly. Generally, the effect is negligible unless the sequence was grossly altered or the calibration was also out of limits. 8.0 pp'-crtjcide/PCB 8.1 Is Form IX present and complete for each GC column and 72 hr sequence of analyses? ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above. 8.2 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between / raw data and Form IX? __ r -J 1 __ ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under •'Conclusions". 8.3 Is DOT retention time for packed columns > 12 min (except OV-1 and OV-101 columns)? [___.] __ __ ACTION: If no, check that there is adequate resolution between individual components. If not, flag ( results for compounds that interfere with each other (co-elute) "R". 1 .4 Do all standard retention times fall within the windows / ""' established for the first IND A and IND B analyses? f •/] __ —— no * w TUT °01 { STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE . Page: 24 of 36 " Date: March 1989 Revision 6 __ NO - N/A ACTION: Beginning with the samples following the last in control standard, check to see if the chromatograms contain peaks within an expanded window surrounding the expected retention tines. If no peaks are found and, DEC is visible non-detects are valid. If peaks are present and cannot be identified through "pattern recognition" or a consistent shift in standard retention times, flag all affected compound results "R". 8.5 Are the continuing calibration standard calibration factors within 15% (for quantitation column) or 20% (for confirmation column) of the initial (at beginning of 72 hr sequence) calibration factors? r J 1 __ __ ACTION: If no, flag all associated positive results "J". Use professional judgement to determine whether or not to flag non-detects. Identification I > " I- Fom X corrplete for every sarple in which a pest jr. He or PCS was detected? [ _ ^_] __ __ ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above. 9.2 Are there any transcription errors between raw data and Form X? ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". 9.3 Are retention timps of sample compounds within the calculated retention time windows for both quantitation and confirmation analyses? [__] __ __ Was GC/MS confirmation provided when required (when / compound concentration is > 10 ug/ml in final extract)? [__] __ i/ ACTION: Reject ("R") all positive results (meeting quantitation column criteria, but missing confirmation by a second column or GC/MS (if appropriate). Also, reject ("R") all positive results not meeting retention time window criteria unless associated standard compounds are similarly biased (i.e. base on RRT to DEC). 9.4 Check chromatograms for false negatives, especially for the multiple peak components toxaphene and PCB's. Were / there any false negatives? __ f y_] __ ACTION: If appropriate PCS standards were not analyzed, or if the lab performed no confirmation analysis, flag the appropriate data with an "R". /// or "$3 TUT 001 026o STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 35 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A" . 0 Compound Ouantitation and Reorter* Detect] 10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in Form I results? Check at least two positive values. / Were any errors found? __ [ v 1 __ NOTE: Sijiple peak pesticide results can be checked for rough agreement between quantitative results obtained on the two GC columns. The reviewer should use professional judgement to decide whether a much larger concentration obtained on one column versus the other indicates the presence of an interfering compound. If an interfering compound is indicated, the lower of the two values should be reported and qualified as presumptively present at an estimated quantity ("JN"). This necessitates a determination of an estimated concentration on the confirmation column. The narrative should indicate that the presence of interferences has obscured the attempt at a second column confirmation. it)./ Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions and, for soils, sample moisture? / [__] __ ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". ACTION: When a sample is analyzed at more than one dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis). Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration range in the original analysis by crossing out the "E" value on the original Form I and substi- tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted sample. Specify which Form I is to be used, then draw a red "X" across the entire page of all Form I's that should not be used, including any in the summary package. 11.0 11.1 Were baselines stable? 11.2 Were any electropositive displacement (negative peaks) or unusual peaks seen? 11.3 Were early eluting peaks (for early eluting analytes) resolved to baseline? ACTION: For 11.1 and 11.2, comment only. For 11.3, reject ("R") those analytes that are not sufficiently resolved. L/J __ __ __• LiJ __ TUT OOi O261 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 36 of 36 ; Date: March 1989 Revision 6 K ' Y E S N O N / A 12.0 Field Dupl j^t*"5 — 12.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for PEST/PCB analysis? r - 1 __ __ ACTION: Conpare the reported results for field duplicates and calculate the relative percent difference. ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate results most be addressed in the reviewer narrative. However, if large differences exist, identification of field duplicates should be confirmed by contacting the sanpler. I * TUT OO1. 026 : - c.? -*: xs:: Jars CSC/ TUT 001 0263 CEIMIC I CORPORATION \ August 4, 1989 USEPA Contract Laboratory Program 209 Madison Street, Suite 200 .. - Alexandria, VA 22314 ; ATTN: Muhannad Kanaan Dear Muhannad: ,- '^^-•'"' Enclosed is the resubmitted diskette and documentation for EPA case 12058, SDG BT747 and BX978. Please replace the resubmitted page for that arriving with the original datapack. This diskette contains the fractions VGA, BNA and Pests. Sample BY770 will not be reanalyzed. Thank you for your time in this matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Kindest Regards, 'Veronica Moretti Document Control Encl. cc: USEPA EMSL-LV USEPA Region II I 100 Dean Knauss Drive, Narragansett, R.I. 02882 • (401) 782-8900 • FAX (401) 782-8905 I TUT °01 °264 I SAMPLE DATA PACKAGE 136 TUT 00.1 026!: f t SAMPLE DATA PACKAGE PAGE 1. Case Narrative 140 2. Traffic Report 145 3. Volatiles Data a. QC Summary 154 (1) Surrogate Percent Recovery Summary (Fora 2 VOA) (2) Matrix Spike/MAtrix Spike Duplicate Summary (FORM 3 VOA) (3) Method Blank Summary (FORM 4 VOA) (4) GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration (Form 5 VOA) (5) Internal Standard Area Summary (FORM 8 VOA) b. Sample Data 177 (1) TCL Results - Organic Analysis Data Sheet (FORM 1 VOA) (2) Tentatively Identified Compounds (FORM 1 VOA-TIC) (3) Reconstructed Total Ion Chromatograms (RIC) for each sample or extract c. Standards Data 325 (1) Initial Calibration Data (FORM 6 VOA) (2) Continuing Calibration (FORM 7 VOA) (3) Internal Standard Area Summary (FORM 8 VOA) d. Raw QC Data 372 (1) BFB a. Bar Graph Spectrum b. Mass Listing (2) Blank Data a. Tabulated Results (FORM 1 VOA) b. Tentatively Identified Compounds (FORM 1 VOA-TIC) c. Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms and Quantitation Reports. d. TCL Spectra with Lab Generated Standards e. GC/MS Library Search Spectrum for TIC f . Quantitative Calculation of TIC (3) Matrix Spike Data a. Tabulated Results of Nonspiked TCL Compound b. Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms and Quantitation Reports . (4) Matrix Spike Duplicate Data a. Tabulated Results of Nonspiked TCL Compounds (FORM 1 VOA) b. Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms and Quantitation Reports //*? *f '33, TUT 001 SAMPLE DATA PACKAGE PAGE Semi-Volatiles Data a. QC Summary . 444 (1) Surrogate Percent Recovery Summary (Form 2 SV) (2) Matrix Spike/MAtrix Spike Duplicate Summary (FORM 3 SV) (3) Method Blank Summary (FORM 4 SV) (4) GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration (Form 5 SV) (5) Internal Standard Area Summary (FORM 7 SV) b. Sample Data 467 (1) TCL Results - Organic Analysis Data Sheet (FORM 1 SV-l,SV-2) (2) Tentatively Identified Compounds (FORM 1 SV-TIC) (3) Reconstructed Total Ion Chromatograms (RIC) for each sample or extract c. Standards Data 634 (1) Initial Calibration Data (FORM 6 SV-l,SV-2) (2) Continuing Calibration (FORM 7 SV-l,SV-2) (3) Internal Standard Area Summary (FORM 8 SV-l,SV-2) d. Raw QC Data 694 (1) DFTPP a. Bar Graph Spectrum b. Mass Listing (2) Blank Data a. Tabulated Results (FORM 1 SV-l,SV-2) b. Tentatively Identified Compounds (FORM 1 SV-TIC) c. Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms and Quantitation Reports. d. TCL Spectra with Lab Generated Standards e. GC/MS Library Search Spectrum for TIC f. Quantitation Calculation of TIC (3) Matrix Spike Data a. Tabulated Results of Nonspiked TCL Compound (FORM 1) b. Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms and Quantitation Reports . (4) Matrix Spike Duplicate Data a. Tabulated Results of Nonspiked TCL Compounds (FORM 1 SV-l,SV-2) b. Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms and Quantitation Reports 13* Itff TUT OO1 0267 i SAMPLE DATA PACKAGE Page 5. Pesticide/PCB Data a. QC Summary 731 (1) Surrogate Percent Recovery (Forms 2E,F) (2) Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Results (Forms 3E,F) (3) Method Blank Summary (Forms 4C) b. Sample Data 736 (1) TCL Results - Organic Analysis Data Sheet (Form ID) (2) Copies of Pesticides/PCB chromatograms '•**-, (3) Copies of Pesticides/PCB chromatograms second GC column confirmation (4) GC integration report (5) Manual work sheets c. Standards Data 768 (1) Form 8D,E PEST/PCB 1 (2) Form 9 PEST/PCB (3) Form 10 PEST/PCB x-" (4) Pesticide/PCB standard chromatograms I and data system printouts d. Raw QC Data 835 (1) Blank Data a. Tabulated results b. Chromatograms and data system printouts (2) Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Data a. Tabulated results b. Chromatograms and data system printouts TUT 00i °268 I t I I I I CASE KAKRATIVE I - I t / j n /to TUT 001 0269 2. TRAFFIC REPORTS 145 /2V iff- V3.J TUT ooi 0270 j u/ u -ShQ ^*S ^V ^* A'S^ V 0 Krrl< So *$ I T/.30 TOO in'- 3? ^ J r mi)i6 X I) r- 4 LO /V w, 5 ^-t{ 5U SOLID WATER-MIS LIQUID NON WATER- MIS LIQUID MANAGEMENT OFFICE 5 P.O. BOX 818 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313 o' 703/557-2490 F15-557-2490 CASE NO: SAS NO: (IF APPLICABLE) ORGANIC TRAFRC REPORT (FOR CLP USE ONLY) OF ACTIVITY (CIRCLE^CWeK-. \s -i- <j) SUPERFUND—PA SI ESSaiEST'RD "flA €R .,.,,,,_NPLD O&M OTHER NON-SUPERFUND— ' *' "" 'pROe'RAM SAMPUE-tlESCRIPTlOKi'^11*1^ (ENTER IN BOX A)-aii4.-SOIL":LT.:!: UHUUpei 1. SURFACE WATER.!,5. SEDIMENT- -I.-Q', 2. GROUND WATER 6. OIL"(SAS) *^ 3. LEACHATE D^ «7. WASTE (SAS) PV?) REGI NO:-^"'"-'SAMPLING COMPANY © ATTM. SAMPLING DATE: BEGIN: DATE REC'O: LABORATORY CONTRACT NO. UNIT PRICE TRANSFER TO: . DATE REC'D: © 'D 8Y: CONTRACT N07PRICE: CLP . - SAMPLE NUMBER - (FROM LABELS) CONCENTRATION ' @ L - IOWMEO H - HIGH (SAS( O « ;»c. s^c p - r~'HAS"" '" ;• . ANALYSIS - N I PESTICIDE /PCB's ':'SPEC'lAJL HANDLING 'STATION ; LOCATION c; SAMPLE CONDITION ^ CC ON RECEIPT HIGH CONC. PHASES ! ^CHECK) UJO feO ' 3 \^ X/l -E / .i $ WHITE - SMO COPY PINK ^- CLIENT COPY WHITE - LAB COPY FOR RETURN TO SMO YELLOW — LAB COPY "° a"ff USEPA CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAM ^ SAMPLE MANAGEMENT OFFICE -5 P.O. BOX 818 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313 -- / 703/557-2490 FTS-557-2490 CASE NO: SAS NOr- (IF APPLICABLE) ORGANIC TRAFFIC REPORT (FOR CLP USE ONLY) TYPE OF ACTIVITY (CIRC 1 SUPERFUND— PA SI E 1 .- ,.. ..... NPLD C NON-SUPERFUND— LEONE SI RIF5 &M O .; ..... . ^ > RD RA E TtJCO D R ILPROGRAM SAMPLE DESCRIPTION !:>U'6U1 (ENTER IN BOX A)-aJ£*.rSOIL*i.Ct;i uniupei 1. SURFACE WATER, :.-£. SEDIMENT-, c) -,,., 2. GROUND WATER-^S. OIL^(SAS) " * " 3. LEACHATE D^ :7. WASTE {SAS) REGION NO:: l;':1"r-'rSAMPLiNG""cOMPAh I j3r~:,Z'.'c <J*t~* f^K:.*—?ii 4Y ® I SAMPLER: <NAME) 0_.i'-: ^-^IC-:'U_- , . -. CLP .__ "SAMPLE"1 I NUMBER- - • (FROM LABELS) |— 7£/ ^ . • • ! •'. "'"' - ": i i - SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ©1 (FROM BOX 1) '•- ;, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | ^/ ll CONCENTRATK L » LWWMEO H - /. - ^HIP A^f" — 'S*> 3 ' D^VrfcKfoSS ' ^Jt.' T<3-r r »p -3ncf ^ Q> DATE REC'D: SDG NO: © v s-~-' :-f : AvrAo/A' c-' r-" ;- :' ; c'~T2rT"" >""i 'C/~~ r7 TL- io \\o\\ \ i^( / M / K»- -^ '• REC'O BY:**" • ' • • " " -:""" ••• ' •^^c* I ]JlAarT^jCxJ»i\cr>c>X^ ^"^"•^"^ --— LAgbRATORY CONTRACT NO. UNIT PRICE • '- ...... ,— ,~ ,,,,.. .v | V_>^ SAMPLING DATE: £ |£"/$ BEGIN: END: ® Vi/^.D \OQ5-?s 1^5 1 - TRANSFER TO: DATE REC'D: © f •SfrSSSl ....ANALYSIS.-. ^ VOLATILE : * i; • I 1 >c -'• PESTICIDE /PCB's ' ^ - - ' O IT C.'-iXOA *- ---SPECIAL- *~: , .HANDLING j , . .,r«,c.. ^(L \ vYA s NJ/^X OyVLfi tJV\rtl/Ysj>ta ,- — ..-.,.. .• ICD< O opf"n <D ~ STATION LOCATION v , > .-;v c «£-0*.-t»35 - - ^ * lL Mp*->o \ KrvOTx V - I yy ' /" . -.• • - • •. -- --• — - ——— — — BY: CONTRACT NOJPRICE: SAMPLE CONDITION :, •-. .ON RECEIPT • - • _ • - r- ,- .-• v. .. - / S&JL) • • - -- — •-- - - - - - •1*0 5 HIGH CONC PHASES : ?- (CHECK) 0 / V) Is8 cio UZ) 88 2*2 •*> ^ . IPA Form 2075-7 (8-87) . A "* " WHITE — SMO COPY PINK — CLIENT COPY WHITE — LAB COPY FOR RETURN TO SMO YELLOW — LAB COPY sj TJ SZ.SO TOO r~ * 5s! - X ) 5 \ "3 'i 1 ^ <-,•; ".<: •: SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ft (FROM BOX 1)1 <• , W 2 3 4 5 6 7 CONCENTRATION @ L • UMTMED H •> HIOH (SAS) VOLATILE BASE/NEUT /ACID \ PESTICIDE /PCB's SOLID WATER— MIS LIQUID WATER- MIS LIQUID > ' OT W O 0 0 r> § 9V ini !! 88 £ ut zo o 5 M O en a r 9/.:~' -co ini 6 J - 6 W . M -;» SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ® (FROM BQX 1) • 1 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 CONCENTRATION ; @ L • LOWMEO M ^ HK)H (S*S) VOLATILE BASE/NEUT ./ACID PESTICIDE /PCB's SOLID WATER— MIS LIQUID NON WATER- MIS LIQUID TJt. n 2075-7 trre LLZO TOO mi \ f -4WK t '' »^ t— K. 0*MHL -^4^(FROM r 3 ft) San. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION & OM BOX 1) M , 2 3 4 S 6 7 CONCENTRATION ' '"@ L . LOWMEa H » MWH(S«i( VOLATILE BASE/NEUT /ACID . PESTICIDE /PCB's SOLID WATER— MIS LIQUID NON WATER- MIS LIQUID N TJ W C S b > w « - > Z ^ 0» Z O ^ m '2 hu , OT >> I? CO O •-•fii'T «:i VOIATILES a. QC Summary I - 154 ' /X9 ! < * - ( - - i^*> TUT 001 027a 3CIL Y T L A T I L E Sl ---.' i ^ - • 1 ERA ; SAMPLE NO. i ============ •:• ! BT747 02 1 BT748 03 ! ET749 C4IBX262 J5 ! 3X263 06IBX264 •;;- ! £V265 '' f~' • p y ^~- /., /. : ~; • Ev:2£~- : I: ! !?;:2i:G : .1 , DX976 12 1 DX'-77 1 .3 : BX°-~ .14 | TV/ 7 59 151FY760 16IJ5Y761 17 1 BX266f;S IS ! BX26£i';Sri 19: .'ELK 01 20! VBL.KC2 •- -t : ' i—. i • -,-.-:•• ._ J I . ^.' !__?•-. _ ..' 22 : '-. "LI : :>" 22 : v:?:...: : 05 ::- ;' 'i r:..;-:o/.: i SI ! (TDDir - ; ====== ! 105 : 104 ! 104 ! 106 ! 106 ; 101 : 101 i 104 : 105 : 106 ; 115 : 102 : 102 : 113 : 101 ! 116 : 103 : 106 ! 105 : 104 1 i 02 ! 103 ! °3 ! 103 i 52 ( BFB ) # 96 9-" 95 90 90 90 89 . £3 31: S3 -;. d rr 95 88 95 81 85 S9 10.0 97 97 95 "i j.00 i £3 : r DCE ; # : ====== ; 97 ; 98 ! 96 i 98 1 99 ! 95 1 96 ; 95 ~ * r i .— / i '::_• • < -.- ; j. -. ..- ; 83 : : 03 :. 91 i 1.00 : 92 1 95 : 92 1 100 ! 100 1 =5 ; r'5 i ^1 - ,-, *-, . OTHER ! TOT ! O'JT -== 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ; •j C '•-' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o =• TclL,cr,5-cn = Brcncf luc.rcfcenz CC LI M I T E ' 91-117) ( 74-121; ( 70-121 ' • C::l:;r,ri tr, be; usscl t~ -fl^.c " '..'.--. :L.-.C-£; rLitnde cf ccr. tr<r.c t rn-quirec; C'C li.r.its C G^rrrnr.teE diluted cut : E-T747 155 TUT 001 1/37 0279 OS3O TOO mi 9ST ;._ •-\.—; s III " C ; ' i • • - • — ' -^ ,_•-»-i .:....-... i __ T ; X-~>^ ••"-'-'...: - ; ' I T ~ 3 £ - r . . ' 7 T 3pT = zv- ^ :.c- i:-- o = C . J _ "--T"-:: :;,j ;•- ?:::•--:;.-:; ---:-/, : :•; :->r.'~'i ;•? '_-•.? '...; v:/•* ~ 3-.-,.;• ..v-. add P:--^ ,-_!3 •. T:: ::' ' ::.;••;> r ;. ;: .::• ; - :j.-; r ; i_:"'::r.2 .; •_- ;•:-•? 7 23-. ( L- >:/ 5 n; -•> • .: i >.: -• 5 i '—3\J\a .jT ~ '- .... ; ; ~" ' ~™ • " " • • • * j ' 1 -, •* • ' / 1 : ^21-39 i i -T / "•• ; -1 i 1 W i. C t_> =1 1 : • 33d : t Z»-i- i K--I - I ; •- ,-n i * - " 3 '-.rf ^ 83T tf 33d V. i'-sC SW • • • •• • J.. .-. T " >.-'-! *.' w i~ (D-^/Sn) - r ( •••<\< i ;\imM'">'i ^ i. -L. V ' J ^- 1 < _J -_J 1 4\^-—f SUi -' ^ ': . u (6>|/5n) >••-• r i j^-^j ( -.I'l--:- .-r^— i . . _• u _L. %y •_.,*_ i * _ . wJ i ' i -__• -.J 3 ~" -'! ''-4Q i '— . rN •« O J * ' ^j " • > — ' ^ "T « :""•."• 3 ' 9i ( D^/f:ri; ••~""7.'T "7i.-l 3:.n:d;-j £* ' ..' I." _I ' J 7; 11 C' -\'— ' '.; "'• •3' T •" r "' ' S'J.3^-£a-^ [MD-C-^i 3u-j^T3Cj-:'_;--Ta-T' T 'ul'H 1 0 O !''•-•_> i_' •7 ".' V" V/' ' ' ""i "•* " . - j ' i ' --•• - i_ i 1-1 -- • - H - • -.- i •-•! -£> • , .- .' .-• /••. •_:. •• - : * -• L -' — •- ..... ..-• -_..;, — '--- • , • -' ^. - • -'• -r - .-; c. ^. l" L.. *- - '; . £_ ^ '_ i I'-. i. i J ' • .— 1 '••' '- •i-' ir'i o i - i ' ' ;_' L.j _ j r . ,- - ; " _i 1. i LL 1" .' 1 "! i - ( 1 »•' 2 t - L j ; J n- t' (-- * -;• C rJ i_i 1^ ... •n j'_ cr 5J" C J U'.lO i." < T , .. • l"i "t HI [1 IM L:; C j i—i 'V »--i I ! L,. , 1 i_J_ U f: •;; .1 C-l t- -! rj a - !j! J3 1.'" K .- r'.! '.7 1 i.j ... 1 1 C'i <:f I^ •=r o o . Ci^^ <r X-. T3 tO a ai i: hi E i 1 •--. • :•-. :•: in -< 0 ' L:J l& r-l . _J i. -^ U t'~ •• T" .-1 <l" Hi uJ k> • - ;> •'-i fj tj U . • "T j — 1 " ,"n.j _ j LL LU J_ f - C K- cri LJ 0~' i- < CU _! L- U j f! T -, _ ! <£ 1- ^ f "i <J 0 LD ;; c 0:1 i; ?. CI. j i^ fj'i 11; •*-' n '5 O 'i :r .. • . •• (. - -L: -1 n b; in •-* •--< j.; ; i • '• (J 1! LJ li LJ r j n y >• ii K-" .J i: !!•• ^j r--.- u-i t- <1. Ii '•!• f"' t': -l i ;: n • • «•: 11 n •-!' il i. i C J H n i! i: :, ii o ii '-< II iXi II •:\ UJ i: _j .J 1! <. u, -: r- >-' i; L J U i L" U"J LJ. r !•"! r'i ("' l- ' ,. .' . , , / , ._ , il 1-1 LJ U L, H li i. i i !i • '• ii •••! Mi'' 1 •=.!- i! -,,i .\ o •.;• u'j UJ ii ; ! i " •;i .J ,i i - i - r - r- _j LL l! •:,• •'...• C- •:.' >: !i • i rH TH ,i <.L ii '::; o c •" LJ ii 0- C- 0- 0 !| LL: CO LJ CO -- -- . - . -. -.. -- il rj n -:'- !' ii <- ill || 11. -.! li .ij (•_ ;j ''-.(.; f."- TJ 2.. il ,L • - -:l ^i <:. H f-- f - r- ; i Lri :! ! • - ! • ! • - :.,: : : J i • i t-i i" . . - - - . .. . . ... __ . _ ' i i i • • i 10 h-i (-sj z Liu (J) J! U.I C! 4> J J . J I 'i 'I; li. I ./St) E.:..,de i Lr I MI c L.ab r:.\e ID: J -VrZJ. .•••.!-a i : 1-.-33 i i",:<ti-i:;; ^sci • IristrjiT.tcnt IDi c-..sa No. -;-: --'.I",: r. t : :.£:;?•: 02 3 £;-;- : ' : ^ . i SGIL IZ: !.£3\-el: (Icw/rnea) ;:-.. : r-:T747 t 229 LOW ;'P3 • HIS METHOD BLANK AF PLIES TH THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, I'S AMD MSD: 0,1 : EPA : SAMPLE rn. ; r- — =: — — i-r :ir — rz • :rr rr =:• t v V -~^ t T i ;-• ._•._' . :pv2:-^ IDX2A- :FX2/cl. !£'X2£7 1BX7=^ME t LAB 3 AMPLE ID = - .-• rr - =: ^ — - - — ~ :T = G':"'' I07-- I .. r 90 ic ---•:£. oo •*• •• ••-."'' _ •• -f S9C:07-OS S90i07-0c: S90i-::7-C-£MS 1 LAP ! ; r- -iLE Tr ! ::: :.:;:; — • rr r- ^ = :: L- r. =-::^-r. •' •'!' 'I T '- 1" 1 CM'367 i C03A4 ; r-:-7;-r c r- --, -T ,• r- •_••-'•.. _ '.; i C-'-Zi i i 'I ME ANALYZED r., .-- -r — ' :~ ::-. :— r-. " r^ :.'">':-1 : ^ : •: 1 ••' 7 2 4 — • -i e. _-. - ^ *_ 1940 1SOP ; ;:. 3? ...f 158 J./87 .-ev TUT O01 0282 * I T-,-T- —• * "T i Jo . S^ .r:-T / *t / 06/17/8 : . i- O - - i", ' .— T — . . . , I » -T ,-. / 1 -T ._ &O I- -j I. . ._ _•. i : I f J J. I..' ^ !_•• • - V r<- t.' '.^ .L .-• " J-. y red: '' .1212 SOIL Level :( low/fried ) -t- t : T c ( r : 1 cr T-. i /\ »-. it .•• /•* r-( ^, i T r- i-» -T- o T it CT rr *~s i i /-, t i T i. i ,— • *• • x>. M O ' CT ^ M CH—M.NK t~i r r L_ x c. ^r i U she. r '_.'i_L\.jv- J. ;vo or-frir i_c.cr- ^ i i EFA AMFLE NO. LAB SAMPLE ID • T i ^ T r\ I L.t » U TI ME ANALYZER 3v0107-Oe!1£D i C0773 159 "CRM IV VDA 1/S TUT 001 O2 83 TOO in.l. '7! / T ' • I—m A / T I.IVI •"* J »y -_j i i iix K-H -_j '_• _. 091 16203 ; TT-^:.7067: etn i •—\ *- - J w :9i_,v:i , •jO '9Z.A3 ! 10 3hl Ol 53I"ldd:oJ >ihy~!t{ QCH13U 51 Hi MQ'l ' 3'-. — f • L,.-.u \'i-..\.'"it : '.. L 11"! 111 CCF\P C.--l2i g_F. I r-1 T C Case No.: 120 58, ;_c,b Filt: ID: C03r%9_______ D^te r,.-:alyzcaj 4 A VOLATILE METHOD FLAN:: ^UHMAPY _________ Contract: 6SD9002S No. : EDG lie. : n-:T74: 067 J 9/89 Mstri:;: (soil /i-:a ter ) SOIL 1 Instrument. TDs HS3 Lab Sample ID; V20619-31 Ti.T.e Analyzed: 1355 Level:(low/med) LOW "THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES. hS AND KSD; CTCt ^ EPn AMPLE NO LAB SAMPLE ID LAB 890107-15 CO 400 TIME • ! ANALYZED ! 161 FORM IV VOA /S7 Rev, TUT OO1 0285 VOLATILE I1E7HOD PLANK SUMMARY * L.---b N~,T,C-?: CEIINIC CCRP______________ Contract: 63D9002S • lJ5b Cede: CEIMTC Case No.: 1205F) SAG No.: _______ SDG No.: ET74" Lab File ID: K1&50______ Ls.b Ssmple ID: V0619-B1 I Date Analyzed: 06/19/8?- Time Analyzed: 1414 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Level :( low/med) LDUJ ' Instrument ID: MS2______ THIS METHOD FLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD: ! E P A ! L A B i L A B i T I M E ! ! SAMPLE NO. 01 IBX976 SAMPLE ID I FILE ID I ANALYZED 390107-15 ! B1651 » r^ »vt «--i I— v i -j- P-- t - , 11 11^ i * I Z> I - 162 page? 1 of 1. I FORM IV VGA 1/87 Rev, UT 001 0286 ATTACHMENT 1 SOP NO. BV-6 TOTAL REVIEW CLP DATA ASSESSMENT Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Organic Analysis Case No. 12058 SDG No. BT747 & BX978 LABORATORY CEIMIC SITE Tutu DATA ASSESSMENT: The current functional guidelines (1988) for evaluating organic data have been applied. All data are valid and acceptable except those analytes which have been qualified with a "J" (estimated), "U" ( non-detects), "R" (unusable), or "JN" (presumptive evidence for the presence of the material at an estimated value). All action is detailed on the attached sheets. Two facts should be noted by all data users. First, the "R" flag means that the associated value is unusable. In other words, due to significant QC problems the analysis is invalid and provides no information as to whether the compound is present or not. "R" values should not appear on data tables because they cannot be relies upon, even as a last resort. The second fact to keep in mind is that no compound concentration, even if it has passed all QC tests, is guaranteed to be accurate. Strict QC serves to increase confidence in data but any value potentially contains error. Reviewer Signature: Verified V_£AX> Date / t^/> /19 fa Date TUT OO1 0287 ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 2 OP 10 SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 1. HOLDING TIME: The amount of an analyte in a sample can change vith ti»e due to chemical instability, degradation, volatilization, etc. If the specified holding tine is exceeded, the data may not be valid. Those analytes detected in the samples whose holding time has been exceeded vill be qualified as estimated, "J". The non-detects (sample quantitation limits) vill be flagged as estimated, "J", or unusable, "R", if the holding times are grossly exceeded. The following action vas taken in the samples and analytes due to excessive holding time. SDG No.- BT747 VOA- All analytes in samples BX976, 977 were flagged J. All analytes (except methylene chloride) in samples BX992, BY759, 760 and 761 were flagged J. SDG No.- BX978 VOA- All analytes in samples BX978, 983, 984, 997 and 998 were flagged J. / QE^-^ /3f of (/3± TUT 001 0288 I I ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 3 OP 10 SOP NO. HW-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 2. BLANK CONTAMINATION: Quality assurance (QA) blanks, i.e., method, trip, field, rinse and water blanks are prepared to identify any contamination which may have been introduced into the samples during sample preparation or field activity. Method blanks measure laboratory contamination. Trip blanks measure cross-contamination of samples during shipment. Pield blanks measure cross-contamination of samples during field operations. If the concentration of the analyte is less than 5 times the blank contaminant level (10 times for the common contaminants), the analytes in the samples shown were qualified with "If" for these reasons: it A) Method blank contamination ^ SDG No.- BT747 VGA- Acetone was flagged U in samples BT747.749, BX262, 992, BY759, 760 and 761. Methylene Chloride was flagged U in sample BX977. One TIC was flagged R in Samples BX761 and BY759, two TICs were flagged R in sample BY760. BNA- Two TICs were flagged R in samples BT749, BX262, 263, 264, 977 and BY761 and one TIC was flagged R in samples BY760 and BX976. SDG No.- BX978 VOA- Methylene Chloride was flagged U in sample BX978. Acetone was flagged U in samples BX984, 997 and 998. BNA- One TIC was flagged R in samples BX983, 984, 997, 998, BY704, 710, BY711, 765, 769, 771, 773 and 775. Two TICs were flagged R in samples BX978, BY772 and 774. Both SDGs: Note that no field or trip blanks are associated with these samples. IUT ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 4 OP 10 SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 4. CALIBRATION: Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to ensure that the instrument is capable of producing acceptable quantitative data. An initial calibration demonstrates that the instrument is capable of giving acceptable performance at the beginning of an experimental sequence. The continuing calibration checks document that the instrument is giving satisfactory daily performance. A) RESPONSE FACTOR: The response factor measures the instrument's response to specific chemical compounds. The response factor for the Target Compound List (TCL) must be > 0.05 in both the initial and continuing calibrations. A value < 0.05 indicates a serious detection and quantitation problem (poor sensitivity). Analytes detected in the sample will be qualified as estimated, "J". All non-detects for that compound vill be rejected, "R". SDG No.- BT747 VOA- 2-Butanone vas flagged R in sample BX268. ATTACHMENT 1 SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 5. CALIBRATION: A) PERCENT RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION (ZRSD) AND PERCENT DIFFERENCE (ZD): Percent RSD is calculated fro* the initial calibration and is used to indicate the stability of the specific compound response factor over increasing concentration. Percent D compares the response factor of the continuing calibration check to the mean response factor (RRF) fro* the initial calibration. Percent D is a measure of the instrument's daily performance. Percent RSD mist be <30Z and ZD must be <25Z. A value outside of these Halts indicates potential .detection and quantitation errors. For these reasons, all positive results are flagged as estimated, "J" and non-detects are flagged "UJ" (if ZD or RSD >SOZ). If there is a gross deviation of ZRSD and ZD, the non-detects may be rejected, "R". For the PCB/PESTICIDE fraction, ZRSD for aldrin, endrin, DDT, and dibutylchlorendate must not exceed 10Z. Percent D must be vithin 15Z on the quantitation column and 20Z on the confirmation column. SDG No.- BT747 VOA- cis-l,3-Dichloropropene was flagged J in samples BT747, 748, 749, BY759, 760, 761, 8X262,263, 264,265, 266, 268, 267 977and 992. Methylene chloride was flagged J in samples BT747, 748,749, BX262, 263, 264, 265 and 267. Acetone was flagged J in samples BX267 and 976. Methylene choride was flagged R in samples BX992, BY759, 760 and 761. BNA- Benzyl alcohol was flagged J in sample BX977. SDG No.- BX978 VOA- cis-l,3-Dichloropropene was outside of QC criteria in samples BX978, 983, 984, 997 and 998 and methylene chloride in BX983, 984, 997 and 998 no action vas taken because the samples were previously qualified due to holding time exceedance. Vinyl acetate vas also outside the QC criteria in samples BX983, 984, 997 and 998, no action vas taken because the samples vere previously qualified due to holding time exceedance. BNA- Di-n-Butylphthlate vas flagged J in sample BX997. Benzyl alcohol vas flagged J in samples BY704, 710, 765, 769, 771 and BX983. of TUT 001 O291 ATTACHMENT 1 SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 6. SURROGATES: All saaples are spiked vith surrogate compounds prior to sample preparation to evaluate overall laboratory performance and efficiency of the analytical technique. If the Measured surrogate concentrations vere outside contract specifications, qualifications vere applied to the samples and analytes as shovn belov. SDG No.- BX978 VOA- One surrogate spike in sample BX998 vas outside of QC criteria, no action vas taken because data vas previously qualified for holding time exceedance. TUT °01 °292 ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 7 OP 10 SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 7. INTERNAL STANDARDS PERFORMANCE Internal standard (IS) performance criteria ensure that the GC/MS sensitivity and response are stable during every experimental run. The internal standard area count mist not vary by «ore than a factor of 2 (-SOZ to +100X) fro* the associated continuing calibration standard. The retention tins of the internal standard Bust not vary more than +30 seconds from the associated continuing calibration standard. If the area count is outside the (-50Z to +100Z) range of the associated standard, all of the positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are qualified as estimated, "J", and all non-detects as "UJ" or "R" if there is a severe loss of sensitivity. If an internal standard retention time varies by more than 30 seconds, the reviewer vill use professional Judgment to determine either partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction. SDG No.- BX978 VGA- 4-Methyl-2-pentanone, 2-hexanone, tetrachloroethene, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, toluene, chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene, styrene and total xylenes in sample BX998 have already been qualifed due to holding tine exceedance. BNA- Di-n-octyl phthalate, benzo(B)fluroanthene, benzo(k)flouranthene, benzo(a)pyrene, indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene and benzo(g,h,i)perylene vas flagged J in sample BX978. I i- TUT 001 ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 8 OP 10 SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 8. COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION: A) VOLATILE AND SEMI-VOLATILE FRACTIONS: TCL compounds are identified on the GC/MS by using the analyte's relative retention time (RRT) and by comparison to the ion spectra obtained fro* known standards. For the results to be a positive hit, the sample peak Bust be within +0.06 RRT units of the standard compound and have an ion spectrum1 which has a ratio of the primary and secondary m/e intensities within 20Z of that in the standard compound. For the tentatively identified compounds (TIC) the ion spectra must match accurately. In the cases in which there is not and adequate ion spectrum Amatch, the laboratory may have provided false positive identification. B) PESTICIDE FRACTION: The retention times of reported compounds must fall within the calculated retention time windows for the two chromatographic columns and a GC/MS confirmation is required if the concentration exceeds 10 ng/ml in the final sample extract. SDG BT747 VOA- Phenol vas rejected as a TIC in samples BY759 and 760 because it is a BNA TCL compound. Due to missing spectra the following analytes were flagged N; carbon tetrachloride and trichloroethene in sample BX267, benzene and chlorobenzene in sample BX 268, acetone in sample BX976 and toluene in BY759. Pest- XD vas outside of QC limits on the primary column for sample BY759 no action vas taken because XD vas vithin control limits on the secondary column. SDG BX978 Pest--All aiialjiu *«-ic flaagtd I\ in cample DXQQ7 utuiuje XD VOB H*it-jlde QO Li.Ami.iu uu buth tin tuimagy •"«* atcuiiduij lUluuui XD vas outside of QC limits on the primary column for sample BX984 no action vas taken because XD vas vithin control limits on the secondary column. *A11 TIC compound results (VOA and BNA) are flagged "J" (estimated), and also "N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of the compound) if an identification is made, to reflect the qualitative and quantitative error inherent in the analysis of compounds without corresponding calibration standards. TUT 00.1 0294 I I ATTACHMENT 1 SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 9. MATRIX SPIKE/SPIKE DUPLICATE, MS/MSD: The MS/MSD data are generated to determine the long-term precision and accuracy of the analytical method in various matrices. The MS/MSD may be used in conjunction with other QC criteria for some additional qualification of the data. SDG No.- BT747 BNA- 1,4-dichlorobenzene, 4-nitrophenol, 2,4-dinitrotoluene aq4 pentachorophenol were flagged R in sample BY759. C.J SDG No.- BX978 Pest- In sample BY775 gamma-BHC, heptachlor, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin and 4,4-DDT were outside of QC criteria, however no action was needed,aaiuplt mj piL.iuujlj qualified fet- jun-egata racounnr. TUT OO1 O29 ATTACHMENT 1 SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 10. OTHER QC DATA OUT OF SPECIFICATION: SDG BX978 BNA- Naphthalene and 2-MethyInaphthalene results in sample BY770 and 4-methylphenol in BY759 exceeded calibration range but the lab did not reanalyze (as required by the SOW). Therefore these values were flagged "J". 11. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND OVERALL ASSESSMENT (continued on next page if necessary): Lab failed to complete Form IX for secondary column, and the lab also indicated on all Form IXs (primary and secondary) that both columns vere used for quantitation. Reviewer was unable to exactly reproduce reported CRDLs, however differences were small and no data qualification is required. 12. CONTRACT PROBLEMS / NON-COMPLIANCE: SDG BT747 VOA- Lab used X as a qualifier but did not define it in the narrative. Reviewer contacted lab to determine the definition of X (see attached phone log) as a result, reviewer flagged the positive Naphthalene results "J" in sample BY765. No spectrum was supplied to support the identification of octadecane in BX263. SDG BX978 BNA- Lab failed to flag internal standard out of QC limits for sample BX978, reviewer corrected. Both SDGs- Lab used qualifier "B" for TICs that were not found in the laboratory method blanks. These were removed by the reviewer 13. This package contains re-extraction, re-analysis or dilution. Upon reviewing the QA results, the following form I(s) are identified to be used. Form I's are clearly marked. 001 0296 LABORATORY DATA USER DPO: I] ACTION [ ] FYI Region. ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA jffEffHEFT fl^^M^y CASE NO. / l£ <"ff___________ LABORATORY ~*~~T'£-/fa/ SDG NO. /67^ 7^7 »- /?yr 97^ SOW _____J/f^'___________ REVIEW COMPLETION DATE SOIL ____ OTHER NO. OF SAMPLES ____ WATER REVIEWER tJESD I) ESAT [c^OTHER, CX>NTRACT/CX>NTRACrOR VGA L HOLDING TIMES 2. OC-US TUNE/ GC PERFORMANCE 3. INITIAL CALIBRATIONS 4. CONTINUING CALIBRATIONS 5. FIELD BLANKS (*F - act applicable) 6. LABORATORY BLANKS 7. SURROGATES I MATRIX SPIKE/DUPLICATES 9. REGIONAL QC (*F - not applicable) 10. INTERNAL STANDARDS 11. COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION II COMPOUND QUANTTTATION 13. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 14. OVERALL ASSESSMENT BNA 0 PEST OTHER X 6 / O • No problems or minor problems that do act affect data wabflity. X m No aore thaa about 5% of the data poiau are qualified as cither catiaated or oansable. M • More ihaa about 5% of the data poiau are qualified as •adaated. Z • More taaa about 5% of the data poiau are qualified as •avaable. PPO ACTION ITEMS: | AREAS OF CONCERN. TUT OO1 In Reference to Case No(s): Contract Laboratory Program REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM Date of Call: Laboratory Name: Lab Contact: Region: Regional Contact: Call Initiated By: Telephone Record Log •///>? ho ' / IM / Laboratory In reference to data for the following sample number(s): Iff-A •* VoA gT ?«/7 Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed: (•} ffCci^^ LL&i. X " 3 L'J — ~&£*is^e * /by Summary of Resolution: Signature Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy V>o Date TUT OO1 0298 CEIMIC CORPORATION DATE: *-f// //7 u____ FAX! TO: EPA - fircuvn IT ____ (COMPANY NAME) (NAME) FROM: ___ NUMBER OF PAGES T (INCLUDING COVERSHEET) RE: ________________ COMMENTS/INSTRUCTIONS: • I * yl ^« I ^ft^K ^^ *4 1 ' A ^ * / .1 r_»x V0n«^yTlkAM • ^. o 7^ ji^Kl^fc/ ^\r< BV2*<? ijlp ^^v > W 4 v-MO Drtn Knauss Drive, Narragansett. R.I. 02882 • (401) 782-*°™ • BAV TUT OO1 0299 In Reference to Case No(s): Contract Laboratory Program REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM Telephone Record Log 0 <*£ 3 (L-hm Cvoi) Date of Call: Laboratory Name: Lab Contact: Region: Regional Contact: Call Initiated By: __ Laboratory V Region In reference to data for the following sample numbeKs): J ^6 6r7V7- Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed: 6,4 Summary of Resolution: O Signature Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy /- ^9- Date 57 TUT 001 0300 CEIMIC CORPORATION DATE: TO: ATTN: FROM: FAXI EPA (COMPANY NXME) (NAME) NUMBER OF PAGES RE: (INCLUDING COVERSHEET) COMMENTS/INSTRUCTIONS: 100 Dean Knauss Drive. Narratansett, R.I. 02882 • (401) 782-8900 • FAX (401) 782-8905 of « / - ^ UT 001 0301 SOP NO. HW-6 Revision |6 CLP ORGANKS DMA REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY REVIEW CONCURRED BY; /7\ • fX*.t*JC •**¥*<*———__________ Date: "iduis -Bevilacgua i—————————————— Monitoring Management Branch APPROVED BY; W\<yt*' ' «V^C - -'______________ Date:. Gerard F. McKenna, Chief Monitoring Management Branch !UT 001 0302 SIANEftRD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 3 Of 36 Date: March Revision 6 COMPLETENESS AND DELIVERABLES CASE NUMBER: LAB: SITE; ~ru-rt.i 1.0 KtS Ccroletenegs and Deli^ernblftfT YF^ HO N/A 1.1 Have any missing deliverables been received and added f </1 __ __ to the data package. ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resuhndttal of any missing deliverables. If lab cannot provide then, note the effect on review of the package under the "Contract Problerns/Non-oorpliance" section of reviewer narrative. 1 1.2 Was sn CCS checklist included with package? f S\ __ __ •> n rc^er Jyett.er/Case Narrative I 2.1 Is the Narrative or Cover Letter present? 2.2 Are Case Number and/or SAS number contained in the / Narrative or Cover Letter? f s 1 __ __ 3.0 Data Validation Checklist The following checklist is divided into three parts. Part A is filled out if the data package contains any VGA analyses, Part B for any SNA analyses and Part C for Pesticide/PCBs. Does this package contain: U3A data? ^ S __ BNA data? t/ __ Pesticide/PCB data? / __ ACTION: Ccrplete corresponding parts of checklist. TUT 00 i O3C>3 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 4 of 35 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A PART A: VOA ANALYSES 1.0 Traffic Reports and 3 . 3 Are the Traffic Report Poms present for all samples? If no, contact lab for replacement of missing or illegible copies. 1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any problems with sample receipt, condition of samples, analytical problems or special notations affecting / the quality of the data? __ [_./] ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the effect on the quality of the data. ACriON: If any sample analyzed as a soil contains more than 50% water, all data should be rejected. ACTU.v If both VOA vials for a sample have air bubbles, flag all positive results "J" and all non -detects "R". 2.C 2.1 Have any VOA holding times, determined from date of / collection to date of analysis, been exceeded? \/ If unpreserved, aqueous aromatic volatiles must be analyzed within 7 days of collection and non-aromatic volatile* mist be analyzed within 14 days. If preserved with hydrochloric acid and stored at 4°C, then both aromatic and non-aromatic volatiles must be analyzed within 14 days. If uncertain about preservation, contact the sampler to determine whether the samples were preserved. A ten-day holding time for soil samples is recommended. Table of Holdina Time Violations (See Traffic Report) Sample Date Date Lab Data Sample Matrix Preserved ? Sampled Received Analyzed S'iX?-&rv? BY^Ji- &.••• / A'' C- 6--/7/P5 * ~irv~.A- ^.- ; >^C (,/U/K L, A » -_, ACTION: If holding times are exceeded, flag all positive results as estimated ("J") and sample quantitation limits as estimated ("UJ") , and document in the narrative that holding tines were exceeded. .^S- r ,.... /ss t?r c 3 > TUT 001 0304 & 7» x . _o Xa, au A -T> _Ti t-o V OJ TV -T, r -A , •y*• — Vi c, ; r- ' xJ r( * -*> (/J V * _i> —i rp <\ & X _n •0 V, n \ LH -1 <r._ r- 10 w O ° r • »4 *r> -J^ JS ?- c\ r i ' c & T ^ *£ t^ ^. c, o \ O t-- r V- STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 5 pf 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 "~~~ NO " If analyses were done more than 14 days beyond holding tine, either on the first analysis or upon reanalysis, the reviewer Bust use professional judgement to determine the reliability of the data and the effects of additional storage on the sauple results. The reviewer nay determine that non-detect data are unusable ("R") . 3.1 Are the VQA Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Fora U) present for each of the following matric a. Low Water [__) __ b. Med Water [__] __ tX c. Low Soil f /i __ __ d. Med Soil I__] __ 3.2 Are all the VQA samples listed on the appropriate Surrogate Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water b. Med Water c. Low Soil r i/1 __ __ d. Med Soil ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittals. If missing deliverables are unavailable, doamnnt effect on data under "Conclusions'1 section of reviewer narrative. 3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. 3.4 Was one or more VQA surrogate recovery outside of contract specifications for any sample or method blank? If yes, were samples reanalyzed? Were method blanks reanalyzed? ACTION: If surrogate recoveries are > 10% but all do not meet SOW specifications: 1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J"). 2. Flag all non-detects as estimated detection limits ("UJ"). TUT 001 O3O6 STANDARD OKRACTC PROCEDURE Page: 6 Of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO If any surrogate has a recovery of <10% : 1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J"). 2. Flag all nan-detects as unusable ("R"). Professional judgement should be used to qualify data that have method blank surrogate recoveries out of specification in both original and re- analyses. Check the internal standard areas. 3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw . data and Form II? __ [ /I ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". ' - 4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III) prrsr-nt ? 4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency for each of the following matrices: a. Low water I_] b. Med Water [__] c. Low soil [_/] d. Med Soil [__] ACTION: If any matrix spite data-are missing, take the action specified in 3.2 above. 4.3 How many VGA spite recoveries are outside QC limits? Water Soils 7>t, BT^V? *VA OUt Of 10 'O OUt Of 10 4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spite and matrix spite duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits? If MS and MSD both have less-«han 10% re- I -^ covery for an analyte, negative results for 1 that analyte should be rejected, and positive results should be flagged "J". i The above applies only to the sanple used ();,()7 • for the MS/MSD analysis. Use professional m judgement in applying this criterion to other /$"# at eamrtlac < OPERATING PHX1UURE Page: 7 Of 36 I Date: March 1989 Revision 6 I YES NO N/A 5.0 Blanlcs (Form IV) 5.1 Is the Method Blank Suimary (Form IV) present? [ >/] __ 5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of VTJA TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil, / [JLJ _ _ L/, medium soil), whichever is more frequent? 5.3 Has a VIA instrument blank been analyzed at least once every twelve hours for each OC/MS system used? Ad id*. If any method blank data are missing, call lab for explanation / resutmittal. If not available, reject all associated positive data ("R"). i. 4 Chromatograpny: review the blank raw data - chromatograms (RICs), quant reports or data system printouts and spectra. J3 i\he chromatographic performance (baseline stability) / for each instrument acceptable for VTJts? \.\/1 __ _ ACTICU: Use professional judgement to determine the effect on the data. : 6.0 Contamination NOTE: "Hater blanks'* and "distilled water blanks" are validated like any other sample and are DQt used to qualify data. Do not confuse than with the other QC blanks discussed below. 6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive results (TCL and/or TIC) for vans? tften applied as described below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution Factor. / */ I __ ) _ 6.2 Do any field/trip/rinse blanks have positive VUV results (TCL and/or TIC)? ACTION: Prepare a list of the samples associated with each of the contaminated blanks. (Attach a separate sheet.) Gnly field/rinse blanks taken the same day as the samples are used to qualify data. Trip blanks are used to qualify only those samples J ^. with which they were shipped. Blanks may not be qualified because of contamination in another blank. Blanks may be qualified for surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems. TUT 001 0308 \ C82ANICS ILA« CCNTAMINATICNl CASE: / P-C S '"L" LAS: C € j f i A > C SITE: -TuA^. FilACTICN: v/~ /4 ANALTTES TCl AFFECTED SAMPLES IMETHCO IUNC CONTAMINATIONS .........T.........T....... 10 (.' &*L ................................. AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT MN*t- •eewr. NO: i-Y T R I P tHKt CCNT. j NO: AMOUNT NO: J AMOUNT | TUT 001 0309 CRSANICS ItANC CCN7AMINATICWI CASE: /,2-ti SITE: _, LAB: UfiMi C FRACTION: t'C ft I | ME 7 HO IUNC CCNTAXI NATIONS ANALTTES TCL f ' TIC A' 7. 9 AMOUNT AMCL1IT 10 AMOUNT RINSE ILAKK CCKT. ID AMOUNT AFFECTED SAMPLES Ibl NO: AMOUNT AMOUNT NO: T R I P BlA« CCWT. T NO: AMOUNT NO: AMOUNT TUT OO1 031O STANDARD OPERATING FHOCHJUKL Page: 8 of 36 - Date: March 1989 Revision 6 Y E S N O N/A" ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest value from all the associated blanks. jSanple cone > CRQL'Sanple cone < CRQL ijSanple cone > CRQL ' but < lOx blank is < lOx blank value value & >10x blank value ! F1 an ej»TtirO a m« il *•' Methylene chloride Flag sanple result Reject sanple result Acetone with a 'U1; cross and report CRQL; Toluene out 'B' flag cross out »B« flag _____2-butanone_!___________j__________• No qualification is needed j Sample cone > CRQL [Sample cone < CRQL t! Sanple cone > CRQL jbut < 5x blank is < 5x blank value value & > 5 blank value Other F*ag s*11!?16 result Reject sanple result!No qualification •Tontaminants with a 'U'; cross and report CRQL; is needed jout 'B' flag cross out 'B' flag i———————————i————————————.1—————————— ACTION: For TIC compounds, if the concentration in the sample is less than five times the concentration in the most con- taminated associated blank, flag the sanple data "R" (unusable). 6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every sample? [__] __ __ ^ ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank. Deception: samples taken from a drinking water tap do not have associated field blanks. 7.0 GC/MS Tuning and Mass Ca] jfrration (Form V} 7.1 Are the GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration Forms (Fora V) / present for Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)? f i^f __ __ 7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge (m/z) listing for the BFB provided for each twelve / ' hour shift? f i/1 __ _ 7.3 Has a tuning performance compound been analyzed for every / twelve hours of sanple analysis per instrument? f t/1 ACTION: If any tuning data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ACTION: List date, time, instrument ID, and sample analyses for which no associated GC/MS tuning ; data are available. TUT OO1 O3.ll SXANCARD OPERATING PROCtlXIKt Page: 9 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A —— —— JJVSiTUJflCJYJ. - ———————————————————————— _________________________ aAnrie. nunnuo ACTION: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration interval. 7.4 Have the ion abundance criteria been met for each instrument used? ACTION: List all data which do not meet ion abundance criteria (attach a separate sheet). ACTION: If tuning calibration is in error, flag all associated sample data as unusable ("R"). However, if expanded ion criteria are met (See 1988 Functional Guidelines), the data reviewer may accept data with appropriate qualifiers. 7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors between mass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least two values but if errors are found, check more.) 7.6 Have the appropriate number of significant figures (two) been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors are found check more values.) ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resufcroittal, make necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions11. 7.7 Are the spectra of the mass calibration compound acceptable? ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine whether associated data should be accepted, qualified, or rejected. 8.0 Target Co CLl An 8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form Z VQA) present with required header information on each page, for each of the following: a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates c. Blanks L/J ;UT 001 0312 ofU<ATlNG PROCEDURE Page: 10 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 8.3 Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report? 6.4 Is chrcnatographic performance acceptable with respect to: Baseline stability I YES NO N/A " 8.2 Are the VOA Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, the mass spectra for the identified compounds, and the v_ data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in j the sample package for each of the following? a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates (Mass spectra not required) c. Blanks ACTION: If any data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. Resolution Peak shape f «/! __ __ Full-scale graph (attenuation) L-^J __ __/ Other:________________ ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the acceptability of the data. / T* 8.5 Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the / identified VOA compounds present for each sample? f 1 ^ ACTION: If any mass spectra are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. If Lab does not generate their own standard spectra, make note in "Contract Problems/Non-compliance". 8.6 Is the RRT of each reported compound within 0.06 RFT units of the standard RRT in the oontinuing calibration? f *•' 1 __ __ 8.7 Are all ions present in the standard mass spectrum at a relative intensity greater than lot also present in the sample mass spectrum? 8.8 Do sample and standard relative ion intensities agree within 20%? I ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine acceptability of data. If it is determined that incorrect identifications were made, . all such data should be rejected, flagged j -— "N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of the compound) or changed to not detected (at the calculated detection limit). •yij-f OO1 031--- Page: 11 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 I YES NO N/A \0 Tentatively Identified Comnexmds I 9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Form I, v Part B) present; and do listed TICs include scan number or retention time, estimated concentration and "J" | qualifier? 9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified compounds and associated "best match" spectra included I in the sample package for each of the following: a. Sanples and/or fractions as appropriate ' ' b. Blanks f / ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ACTION: Add "J" qualifier if missing and "N" qualifier to all identified TIC conpounds on Form I, Part B. •> T Are any TCL conpounds (frcn any fraction) listed as ','IC conpounds (exanple: 1,2-dimethylbenzene is xylene— a VOA TCL—and should not be reported as a TIC)? S [__] __ ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC. 9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the / sample mass spectrum? r ^ 9.5 Do TIC and "best match" standard relative ion intensities agree within 201? ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine acceptability of TIC identifications. If it is determined that an incorrect identi- fication was made, change identification to "unknown" or to some less specific identi- fication (exanple: "C3 substituted benzene") as appropriate. 10.0 Compound O^flJTtj^S'tlTTl and Reportod Detection Limits 10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in Form I results? Check at least two positive values. Verify that the correct internal standard, quantitation ion, and KRF were used to calculate Form I result. Were any errors found? 10.2 Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions and, for soils, saitplc moisture? __ IJLJ — T \ J T 0 01 0 314 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 12 of Date: March 1989 Revision 6 36 YES NO N/A ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary collections and note errors under "Conclusions'1. ACTION: When a sample is analyzed at more than one dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis). Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration range in the original analysis by crossing out the "E" value on the original Form I and substi- tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted sample. Specify which Fora I is to be used, then draw a red nX" across the entire page of all Form I's that should not be used, including any in the summary package. 11-') frtar*3*rttff (GC/MS) .1.1 Vre the Reconstructed Ion Chroma tograms, and data system printouts (Quant. Reports) present for initial continuing calibration? ACTION: if any calibration standard data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. 0 GC/MS Initial Calibration fForm VI) 12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present and complete for the volatile fraction? ACTION: If any calibration standard forms are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. 12.2 Are response factors stable for volatiles over the concentration range of the calibration (BSD <30%)? ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: When BSD >30%, nan-detects may be qualified using professional judgement. Flag all positive results "J". When RSD >90%, flag all nan-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region II policy.) 12.3 Do any compounds have a RRF < 0.05? ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: If any volatile has an average RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that compound as estimated ("J") , and flag non- detects for that cxunjuund as unusable ("R") . TUT XJ OI jo Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YE NO N/A 12.4 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the reporting of average response factors (KRF) or %RSD? (Check at least two values but if errors are / found, check more.) __ L_kLJ __ ACTION: Circle errors in red. ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubroittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". 13.0 GCVMS C/rn'tijTuiDq CSlifcrrtJpn fFoiin 13.1 Are the continuing Calibration Forms (Fora VII) present / and complete for the volatile fraction? Q _ 3 __ __ 13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed for every twelve hours of sample analysis per , instrument? Lk_J __ __ ACTION': List below all sample analyses that were not within twelve hours of the previous continuing calibration analysis. ACTION: If any forms are missing or no continuing calibration standard has been analyzed within twelve hours of every sample analysis, call lab for explanation / resubmittal. If continuing calibration data are not available, flag all associated sanple data as unusable ("R"). 13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard compounds have / a RRF < 0.05? _/_ ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: If any volatile compound has a PRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that compound as estimated ("J"), and flag non-detects for that rcpound as unusable ("R"). 13.4 Do any compounds have a % difference between initial and /. I continuing calibration RRF > 25%? " Jl_ [__] __ ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated I sanple data as outlined in the table below: ^ TUT 001 0316 n or Date: March 1989 Revision 6 I I ~ % DIFFERENCE j 25-50 j 50-90 j >90 YES NO . N/A 13.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the reporting of average response factors (RRF) or differen (%D) between initial and continuing RRFs? (Check at least two values but if errors are found, check more.) ACTION: Circle errors in red. If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". M.gndards (Form VIII) . j Are tf.e internal standard areas (Form VIII) of every «rple ard blank within the upper and lower limits / for **ch continuing calibration? [__] v __ ACTION: List all the outliers below. Sample t Internal Std Area Lower Limit Upper Limit t ? (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the upper or lower limit, flag with "J" all positive results and non- detects (U values) guantitated with this internal- standard. If extremely low area counts are reported, or if perf , exhibits a major abrupt drop off, flag all associated non- 1- I detects as unusable ("R"). . 14.2 Are the retention times of the internal standards within / ' 30 seconds of the associated calibration standard? f » 1 __ __ ACTION; Professional judgement should be used to qualify j -^ data if the retention times differ by more than 30 seconds. TUT 001 0317 I I i I Page: 15 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 15.0 Field DunHoit-.** ^^ **° N/A _ 15.1 Here any field duplicates submitted for VGA analysis? [_/ ] __ __ ACnON: Conpare the reported results for field duplicates and calculate the relative percent difference. ACHON: Any gross variation between field duplicate results rust be addressed in the reviewer narrative. However, if large differences exist, identification of field duplicates should be confirmed by contacting the sanpler. 001 0318 O.Lrui»-ruw I-MLJL _> i i i^j- ratje. xo . Ol JO Date: March 1989 Revision 6 1.0 Traffic Reports and PART B! BNa. ANALYSES Narrative YES 1.1 Are the Traffic Report Ferns present for all samples? ACTION: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing or illegible copies. 1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any problems with sample receipt, condition of samples, analytical problems or special notations affecting the quality of the data? ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the effect on the quality of the data. ACTION*: If any sample analyzed as a soil contains more than 50% water, all data should be rejected. NO N/A LJ_] __ 20 Holdjjig Tines 2.1 Have any BNA holding tires, determined from date of collection to date of extraction, been exceeded? ~ Sanples for ENA analysis, both soils and waters, oust be extracted within seven days of the date of collection. Extracts rust be analyzed within 40 days of the date of extraction. _ u/i _ Sample T*ble of Holding Tijne Violations .(See Traffic Report) Sample Date Date lab Date Date Matrix Sampled Received Detracted Analyzed ACTION: If holding times are exceeded, flag all positive results as estijnated ("J") and sample quantitation limits as estimated ("UJ"), and document in the narrative that holding tines were exceeded. 6 f TUT 001 0319 rrom_tjju«t fdge: A/ OI jo Date: March 1989 Revision 6 NO N/A If analyses were done more than 14 days beyond holding tine, either on the first analysis or upon reanalysis, the reviewer Bust use professional judgement to determine the reliability of the data and the effects of additional storage on the sample results. The reviewer nay determine that non-detect data are unusable ("R") . 3.0 Surrogate Recovery (Form 3.1 Are the BNA Surrogate Recovery Sunmaries (Fora II) present for each of the following matric a. Law Water [__) b. Med Water [__] c. low soil d. Mad Soil [__] __ 3.2 Are all the ENA samples listed on the appropriate Surrogate Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water [__] __ S b. Mad Water c. Low Soil d. Med Son ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittals. If missing deliverables are unavailable, document effect on data under "Conclusions" section of reviewer narrative. 3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. 3.4 Were two or more base-neutral O£ acid surrogate recoveries / out of specification for any sample or method blank? ' v "• If yes, were samples reanalyzed? [ __ ] _ is Were method blanks reanalyzed? [ _ ] _ _j/ ACTION: If all ENA surrogate recoveries are > 10% but two within the base-neutral or acid fraction do not 1 meet SOW specifications, for the affected fraction ! I oj-^y f j..e. base— neutral OR acid pjiiuj'iAjDJi^t 1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J") . jj ^ 2. Flag all non-detects as estimated detection limits ("UJ"). TIJT ("u-'l 0320 SIMCRRD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 18 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 I NO If any base-neutral oj acid surrogate has a recovery of <10% : 1. Flag all positive results for that fraction (i.e. all acid or base-neutral compounds) "J". 2. Flag all non-detects for that fraction "R". Professional judgement should be used to qualify data that have method blank surrogate recoveries out of specification in both original and re- analyses. Check the internal standard areas. 3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw / data and Form II? __ I / 1 _ ATTICJI- If large errors exist, call- lab for explanation / resubmittal , make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". -i . ;J i ••'*• 1 i i,i Spikes (Form III) * 3 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III) / preserr? l_i_J _ I 4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency -_- for each of the following matrices: I a. Low Water [ __ ] __ j£. ! / b. Med Water [ _ 1 _ _•_ c. Low Soil [_/] __ _ d. Med soil t __ 1 __ _i£ fCTKK: If any matrix spike data are missing, take the action specified in 3.2 above. 4.3 How many EN& spike recoveries are outside QC limits? Water Soils SDC-j 8T-fr/y l?/A OUt Of 22 /«/ OUt Of 22 BX'*'?*'' U/A ° 4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spike and matrix spike * duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits? i Water Soils out of 11 J^ out of 11 0 ACTICN: If MS and MSD both have less than 10% recovery for an analyte, negative results for that analyte should be rejected, and positive results should be flagged "J". One above applies only to the sample used for MS/MS) (70 -f D analysis. Use professional judgement in TUT 001 0321 I SEtfCftRD OPERATING PRCCmjRE Page: 19 Of 36 t Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A 5.0 Blanks (Form TV) b.l Is the Method Blank Sumnary vronn IV) present? [ v\ 5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of TCL compounds, has a reagent Aethod blank been analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 sanples of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil, / medium soil), whichever is more frequent? iJL.] _ " _ 5.3 Chromatography: review the blank raw data - chromatograms (RICs) , quant reports or data system printouts and spectra. TS *ho rhromatographir performance (baseline stability) / - n instrument acceptable for«w«? [ / 1 ._ ar VTCr Use professional judgenent to determine the effect on the data h.O Contamination NOTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are validated like any other sample and are net used to qualify data. Do not confuse than with the other QC blanks discussed below. 6 . 1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive results (TCL and/or TIC) for EN&s? When applied as described below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution / Factor. _L_ [ _ ) _ 6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive ETA results / (TCL and/or TIC)? __ I __ 1 jL ACTION: Prepare a list of the sanples associated with each of the contaminated blanks. (Attach a separate sheet. ) NOTE: Only field/rinse blanks taken the same day as the samples are used to qualify data. Blanks may not be qualified because of contamination in another blank. Blanks may be qualified for surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems. I I 11 -t-c? ^. > s TUT ool 03.^, CSSANICS CASE: /^.C'Zil LAB: £t 'A*'C-_ ILA« CONTAMINATION! SITE: YU.^*! FRACTION: g ^'/4 ANAITTES TCL r r TIC r'^"<W- i ""Z^:*** -** "/, /'?c',.A.rt<r,-J 1 1 1 1 1 AFFECTED SAMPLES j METHOD IUMC CCNT AMI NAT IONS •M/ttf AMOUNT ,'fC l/' 5 d'O /?/'77/ 6.,- ^ &W »>»l/s/ AMOUNT /t/C't f.to l^fc f^ *'f1 70 3r773 10 AMOUNT . ID AMOUNT •_ - RINSE BLANK CCKT. NO: AMOUNT f NO: AMOUNT TRIP BLANK CCNT. | HO: AMOUNT ^ NO: | AMOUNT | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Bv— TUT' O01 03: C8SANICS ILANC CONTAMINATION! CASE: LAB: IMETHCO luxe C:NTAXINATIONS AWAtTTES TCL to to AXOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT TIC ArfECTED SAMPLES 10 AMOUNT E 81AKK CCKT. NO: I NO: AMOUNT AMOUNT TRIP BLA« CCNT. NO: AMOUNT NO: AMOUNT | TUT 001 0324 FMJCLDURE *age: tu or 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest value from all the associated blanks. YES NO N/A Guuiiun Jhthalate Esters Other Contaminants ISample cone > CRQLlSample cone < CRQL & jbut < lOx blank is < lOx blank value {Flag sample result {Reject sample result with a 'U'; cross and report CRQL; out 'B* flag cross out >B' flag {Sample cone > CRQLj Sample cone < CRQL & jbut < 5x blank [is < 5x blank value Flag sanple result Reject sample result with a 'U1; cross and report CRQL; out 'B' flag cross out 'B1 flag 1 _ _ _ ! . . _ _ Sample cone > CRQL value & >10x blank value No qualification is needed Sample cone > CRQL value & > 5 blank value No qualification is needed >-«v ACTION: For TIC compounds, if the concentration in the sample is less than five times the concentration in the most con- taminated associated blank, flag the sample data "R" (unusable) . Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every sample? ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank. Exception: samples taken from a drinking water tap do not have associated field blanks. 7.0 GC/M5 Tuning and Mass CRT ^ration (Form VI 7.1 Are the GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration Forms (Form V) present for Decaf luorotriphenylphosphine (DFTFP)? 7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge (m/2) listing for the DFTFP provided for each twelve hour shift? 7.3 Has a tuning performance been analyzed for every twelve hours of sample analysis per instrument? ACTION: If any tuning data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ACTION: List date, time, instrument ID, and sample analyses for which no associated GC/MS tuning data are available. TUT O0.1. CREATING tWJUUURE Page: 21 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A DAIE TIME INSTRUMENT SAMHX NUMHEBS ACTTCN: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration interval. 7.4 Have the ion abundance criteria been met for each instrument used? ACTTCN: List all data which do not meet ion abundance criteria (attach a separate sheet). ACTTCN: If tuning calibration is in error, flag all associated sample data as unusable ("R"). However, if expanded ion criteria are met (See 1988 Functional Guidelines) , the data reviewer may accept data with appropriate qualifiers. 7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors between mass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least two values but if errors are found, check more.) 7.6 Have the appropriate number of significant figures (two) been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors are found check more values. ) ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal , make necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". _/ I__1 __ 7.7 Are the spectra of the mass calibration acceptable? ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine whether associated data should be accepted, qualified, or rejected. 8.0 d List (TCP 8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I present with required header information on each page, for each of the following: a. Sanples and/or fractions as appropriate b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates c. Blanks _- __ STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 22 of jo Date: March 1989 Revision 6 NO N/A 8.2 Are the BNA Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, the mass spectra for the identified conpounds, and the data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in the sanple package for each of the following? a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate f ,/1 __ __ b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates f 1/1 __ __ (Mass spectra not required) c. Blanks ACTION: If any data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. 8.3 Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report? 9.4 Is chnamatographic performance acceptable with respect to: / Baseline stability [_i/] ._ __ Resolution • •! Peak shape r J*\ __ __ Full-scale graph (attenuation) r -A __ __ Other:________________ [__] __ c/ ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the acceptability of the data. 8.5 Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the / identified BNA conpounds present for each sanple? r /I __ __ ACTION: If any mass spectra are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. If lab does not generate their own standard spectra, make note in "Contract Problems/Non-conpliance11. 8.6 Is the RRT of each reported conpound within 0.06 RRT / units of the standard RRT in the continuing calibration? f / 1 __ __ 8.7 Are all ions present in the standard mass spectrum at a , relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the ' / •Arnnl* mass enactmm? f / 1 sanple mass spectrum? 8.8 Do sanple and standard relative ion intensities agree / within 20%? f / ACXTGN: Use professional judgement to determine acceptability of data. If it is determined that incorrect identifications were made, - all such data should be rejected, flagged •W" (presumptive evidence of the presence of the conpound) or changed to not detected (at the calculated detection limit). tKXZDURt . >fege: 2J or 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A .0 Tentatively Identified Qamounds 9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Form I, Part B) present; and do listed TICs include scan number or retention time, estimated concentration and "J" / qualifier? • f J\ __ __ 9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified —mpounds and associated "best match" spectra included in the sample package for each of the following: a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate f J ] b. Blanks r J"\ ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ACTICN: Add "J" qualifier if missing and "N" qualifier to all identified TIC compounds on Form I, Part B. I 9-3 Are any TCL compounds (from any fraction) listed as 1 TIC compounds (example: 1,2-dimethylbenzene is xylei a VGA TCL—and should not be reported as a TIC)? I .^_ ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC. 9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the cample mass spectrum? f J 1 __ __ 9.5 Do TIC and "best match" standard relative ion intensities agree within 20%? f i/ 1 __ __ ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine acceptability of TIC identifications. If it is determined that an incorrect identi- fication was made, change identification to "unknown" or to some less specific identi- fication (example: "C3 substituted benzene") as appropriate. • 10.0 QjiiLound QmMT^ltation and Reported Detection Limits , 10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in J Form I results? Check at least two positive values. Verify that the correct internal standard, quantitaticn ion, and RRF were used to calculate Form I result. / I Were any errors found? J [__] I 10.2 Are the CRQIfi adjusted to reflect sample dilutions and, for soils, sample moisture? ' _^. [__] —— TUT GO.I 0328 STANDARD OPERATING PBorrmpr Page: 24 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions'1. ACTION: Wien a sanple is analyzed at more than one dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher CRQL data from the diluted sanple analysis). Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration range in the original analysis by crossing out the "E" value on the original Form I and substi- tuting it with data f ran the analysis of diluted sanple. Specify which Form I is to be used, then draw a red "X" across the entire page of all Form I's that should not be used, including any in the summary package. 11.0 St^r*3*gfls Pjtta (GC/WS) 11.1 Arc the Reconstructed ion Chromatcgrams, and data system printouts (Quant. Re; and continuing calibration? system printouts (Quant. Reports) present for initial / U/) __ __ ACTION: If any calibration standard data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. I v j GC/MS Initial Calibration fForm VII •""^—-^ JUbbUK«JBU&JEAM^^^dSBJUH(^JUUlUEUMi^^^JUUi^^^l^A 12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present / 1 and cccplete for the BNA fraction? \'J 1 ACTION: If any calibration standard forms are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. 12.2 Are response factors stable for BNAs over the / concentration range of the calibration (RSD <30%)? f v ] ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: When RSD >30%, non-detects may be qualified using professional judgement. Flag all positive results "J". When RSD >90t/ flag all non-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region II policy.) 12.3 Do any compounds have a RRF < 0.05? __ ft/] __ ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: If any BNA conpound has an average RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that conpound as estimated ("J"), and flag non- detects for that compound as unusable ("R"). RJT OOl O329 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 25 Of 36 Date: March 19B9 Revision 6 1 1 12.4 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the reporting of average response factors (RRF) or %RSD? (Check at least two values but if errors are found, check more.) YES NO _ u/T N/A ACTION: Circle errors in red. ACTION: If errors are large, call 'lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". 13.0 GC/MS Continuing calibration (Form VII) 13.1 Are the Continuing Calibration Forms (Fora VII) present / and complete for the BNA fraction? [jLJ __ __ 13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed for every twelve hours of sanple analysis per / instrument? [_i_] __ __ ACTION: List below all sanple analyses that were not within twelve hours of the previous continuing calibration analysis. ACTION: If any forms are missing or no continuing calibration standard has been analyzed within twelve hours of every sanple analysis, call lab for explanation / resubmittal. If continuing calibration data are not available, flag all associated sanple data as unusable ("R"). 13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard compounds have / a RRF < 0.05? f v ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: If any ENA uunifcjuunj has a RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that estimated ("J"), and flag non-detects for that compound as unusable ("R"). 13.4 Do any compounds have a % difference between initial and / continuing calibration RRF > 25%? _i/ • [__] —— ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated sanple data as outlined in the table below: Til "| no 1 0330 •" t-age: 26 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A % DIFFERENCE 25-50 j 50-90 ' •J' positive 'J' positive~'!"?J;~positive results, no action results, 'UJ' results, "R" for non detects non detects' non detects i——.—————————i__________i________ 13.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the reporting of average response factors (HRF) or difference (%D) between initial and continuing RRFs? (Check at / least two values but if errors are found, check more.) __ f / i __ ACTION: Circle errors in red. if errors are large, call lab for emanation / resubaittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". Minimal &*'-"•« rify^s (For??. 1 ' Ai« the internal standard areas (Form VIII) of every ---uiplr and blank within the upper and lower limits / :' or £i2ch continuing calibration? [ __ ] v __ ACTION: List all the outliers below. Sanple I Internal Std Area Lower Limit Upper Limit (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the upper or lower limit, flag with "J" all positive results and nan- detects (U values) quantitated with this internal standard. If extremely low area counts are reported, or if performance exhibits a major abrupt drop off, flag all associated nan- detects as unusable ("R"). 14.2 Are the retention times of the internal standards within 30 seconds of the associated calibration standard? ACTION: Professional judgement should be used to qualify data if the retention times differ by more than 30 seconds. TUT OO1 O331 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE "Page: 27 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YE NO N/A~ 15.0 Field 15.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for ENA analysis? f / i __ __ ACTION: Oorpare the reported results for field duplicates and calculate the relative percent difference. ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate results must be addressed in the reviewer narrative. However, if large differences exist, identification of field duplicates should be confirmed by contacting the sampler. ,f vj> IUT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 28 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 ~ Y E S N O N/A" PART C: PESTICIDE/PCB ANALYSES 2.2 Are the Traffic Report Forms present for all samples? [__/) __ __ ACTION: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing or illegible copies. 1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any problems with sample receipt, condition of samples, analytical problems or special notations affecting / the quality of the data? __ f /I __ ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the effect on the quality of the data. ACTION: If any sample analyzed as a soil contains more than 50% water, all data should be rejected. ?.i Have any PEST/PCB holding times, determined from date of / I rr^Ve tu.-M to date of extraction, been exceeded? __ f J 1 __ Samples for PEST/PCB analysis, both sons and waters, I oust be extracted within seven days of the date of collection. Extracts oust be analyzed within 40 *~ days of the date of extraction. 3.0 Surrogate Recovery fForm III 3.1 Are the PEST/PCB Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II) present for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water __ __ __ b. Med Water [__J __ _k: c. LOW son r /I _ _ d. Med Son [__] __ JL. 3.2 Are all the PEST/PCB samples listed on the appropriate 1 Surrogate Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrices: | a. Low Water [__] __ ^L b. Med Water [__] __ _jZ c. Low Soil f i/i __ —— 4 _ d. Med Son [__] __ _!/ I TUT OO1 Q'W::'- OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 29 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittals. If missing deliverables are unavailable, document effect on data under "Conclusions" section of reviewer narrative. 3.3 were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? ACnOM: Circle all outliers in red. [_/] _ 3.4 Was surrogate (EEC) recovery outside of the contract / specification for any sample or blank? J I __ 1 ACTJOM: No qualification is done if surrogates are diluted beyond detection. If recovery is below contract limit (but above zero) , flag all results for that sample "J". If recovery is zero, flag positive results "J" and non-detects "Rn. If recovery for the blank is zero, flag non-detects for all associated samples "R". If recovery is above contract limit, flag all positive results for that sample "J", unless in the reviewers professional judgement the high recovery is due to co-eluting interference (check the associated blank - if recovery is high there also, flag the sample data). 3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw data and Form II? _ I. ACTICN: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / | resutmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions'1. 4.0 Matrix Spikes (Form III) 4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form IH) / present? [ v 1 __ — 4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency , for each of the following matrices: I / a. Low water [__) ; b. Mad Water [_) c. Low soil I d. Med Soil I_) __ ±_ ACTION: If any matrix spike data are missing, take I the action specified in 3.2 above. 4.3 How many PEST/KB spike recoveries are outside QC limits? I ^ * Water Soils ,-< ')?? ^/& out of 12 L- out of 12 e,-p-;V7 N-/A- I £* .. .-,-•-'•/i "' • - "•••! IT OOl O--'•-• H OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 30 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A 4.4 How many RFD's for matrix spike and matrix spiJce duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits? Water Soils OUt Of 6 O OUt Of 6 ACTION: if MS and MSD both have less than zero recovery for an analyte, negative results for that analyte should be rejected, and positive results should be flagged "J". The above applies only to the sample used for MS/MSD analysis. Use professional judgement in applying this criterion to other samples. 5.o clanks (Form IV) r > - Je tN» Method Blank suimary (Form IV) present? [ /] _ _. j.2 Fryqu^,~:-y of Analysis: for the analysis of Pesticide TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been inalyzad for each set of samples or every 20 samples of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil, medium soil), whichever is more frequent? t t/] __ _ ^ 5.3 Qiromatography: review the blank raw data - chromatograms , quant reports or data system printouts. Is the chromatographic performance (baseline stability) for each; instrument acceptable for PEST/PCBs? [ /] ACTICK: Use professional judgement to determine the effect on the data. 6.0 NDttE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are validated like any other sample and are net used to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the other QC blanks discussed below. 6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive results for PEST/PCBs? When applied as described below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks / are multiplied by the sample Dilution Factor. _ l_/J 6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive REST/PCS results? __ • [ _ ] ACTIOJ: Prepare a list of the samples associated with each of the contaminated blanks. (Attach a separate sheet. ) TUT OOi SIWCftRD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 31 of Date: March 1989 Revision 6 36 NOTE: Cniy field/rinse blanks taken the same day as the samples are used to qualify data. Blanks nay not be qualified because of contamination in another blanV. Blanks may bn qv:alifi«3 for surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems. ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest value from all the associated blanks. YES NO N/A Sample cone > CRQLi Sample cone < CRQLT but < 5x blank is < 5x blank value Sample core > CHQLJ 4 > 5x blank value' -v.g sanple result- .Lh a "U"; crosr .*«-. "B" flag Reject sanr'e result and report CRQL; cross out "B" flag No qualification is needed 7.0 re Mir-re field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every sample? ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank. Exception: samples taken from a drinking water tap do not have associated field blanks. j brat ion and QC Performance .1 Are the following Gas Chromatograms and Data System Printouts for both Primary and Confirmation (confirmation standards not required if there are no positive results above CEQL) colixtn present: a. Evaluation Standard Mix A b. Evaluation Standard Mix B c. Evaluation Standard Mix C d. Individual Standard Mix A e. Individual Standard Mix B f . Multi-component Pesticides Toxaphene t Chlordane g. Aroclors 1016/1260 h. Aroclors 1221, 1232, 1242, 1248, and 1254 ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above [_] Ji _ '3 __ :2 _ ^ ~ ~ [ I/I __ __ f H^ TUT GO! O336 aanrrrrTpF Page: 32 of 36 rate: Maicn 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A 7.2 Is Form VIII Pest-l present and complete for each GC column (primary and confirmation) and each 72 hour / sequence of analyses? ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above. 7.3 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw / data and Form VIII? __ [j/j __ ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for emanation / resubmittal , make any necessary collections and note errors under "Conclusions". 7.4 Has the total breakdown on quantitation or confirmation / column exceeded 20% for DOT? __ [ ,./] __ - for Endrin? __ J /] __ -1 or if Endrin aldehyde and 4,4 '-DDD co-elute and there is a pwk at their retention tine, has the combined DOT and Endrin / breakdown exceeded 20%? _ _ f /] __ I I I i a. If DOT breakdown is greater than 20% on quantitation column beginning with the saqples following the last in control standard: 1. Flag all positive DOT results "J". 2. If DOT was not detected but DDD and/or DCE are positive, flag the DOT non-detect MR". 3. Flag positive DDD and DDE results "JN". 4. If DOT breakdown is > 20% on confirmation column and DOT is identified on quantitation column but not on confirmation column, use professional judgement to determine whether DOT should be reported on Form I (if reported, flag result "N") . b. If Endrin breakdown is > 20% on. quantitation column, beginning with the samples following the last in control standard: 1. Flag all positive Endrin results "J". 2. If Endrin was not detected, but Endrin Aldehyde and/or Endrin Ketone are positive, flag the Endrin non-detect "R". 3. Flag Endrin Ketone positive results "JN". 4. If Endrin breakdown is > 20% on confirmation column and Endrin is identified on quantitation column but not on confirmation column, use professional judgement to determine whether Endrin should be reported on Form I (if reported, flag result "N") . c. If the combined breakdown is used (it can only be used if the conditions in 7.4 above are met) and is > 20% on quantitation column beginning with the last in control standard, take the actions specified in 7.4 a and b above. If the combined breakdown is >20% on confirmation column and Endrin or DOT is identified on quantitation column but not on confirmation column, use professional judgement to determine whether Endrin or DOT should be reported on Form I (if reported, flag result "N") . TUT O01 0337 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 33 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A~ 7.5 Is the linearity check PSD of all four calibration factors / <10% for the quantitation column? r v\ __ __ ACTION: If no, nag positive hits for all pesticide and PCB analytes "J" for all associated samples. Do not flag toxaphene or DDT if they are quantified from a 3-point calibration curve. 7.6 Is the % difference between the EVAL A and each analysis (quantitation and oonf irmation) DBC retention tint within QC limits (2% for packed column, 0.3% for capillary [I.D. /<F" < 0.32 mm], 1% for megabore [0.32 < I.D. < 2 an]) ? ( __ ] / __ ACTION: DBC retention tine cannot be evaluated if DBC is not detected. If it is present and has a retention tine out of QC limits, then use professional judgement to determine the reliability of the analysis and flag results "R", if appropriate. '." Was the proper analytical sequence followed for each / 72 hour period of analyses (page PEST D-36 in 8/87 SOW) . f /I __ __ ACITON: If no, use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect on the data and accept or reject it I accordingly. Generally, the effect is negligible unless the sequence was grossly altered or the calibration was also out of limits. 8.0 ppgticide/PCB Stoiry^*'n|^c Summary 8.1 Is Form IX present and complete for each GC column and 72 hr sequence of analyses? ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above. 8.2 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw data and Form IX? ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and j note errors under "Conclusions". 8.3 Is DOT retention time for packed columns > 12 min / (except OV-l and OV-101 columns)? f / 1 __ __ ACTION: If no, check that there is adequate resolution between individual components. If not, flag I results for compounds that interfere with each » other (co-elute) "R". 8.4 Do all standard retention tijnes fall within the windows / J ^ established for the first IND A and IND B analyses? [_j/J __ __ TUT OO1 0338 •• - ' (fe-7 cf STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 34 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 ACnCN: Beginning with the samples following the last in control standard, check to roc if the chroroatograms contain peaks within an expanded window surrounding the retention times, if no peaks are found and, DBC is visible non-detects are valid. If peaks are present and cannot be identified through "pattern recognition" or a consistent shift in standard retention tines, flag all affected compound results "R". 8.5 Are the continuing calibration standard calibration factors within 15% (for quantitation colunn) or 20% (for confirmation column) of the initial (at / beginning of 72 hr sequence) calibration factors? f J i __ __ ACTION: If no, flag all associated positive results "J". Use professional judgement to determine whether or not to flag non-detects. 0 i * /»! iCj.de/FCB Identification :> ' I.- Form X conplete for every sarple in which a , pestj/v-te or PCS was detected? r 71 __ __ ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above. _ 9.2 Are there any transcription errors between raw / data and Form X? __ f \, 1 __ ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". 9.3 Are retention times of sample compounds within the calculated retention tine windows for both quantitation / and confirmation analyses? Was GC/MS confirmation provided when required (when / compound concentration is > 10 ug/tal in final extract)? (__J __ _v/_ ACTION: Reject ("R") all positive results (meeting quantitation column criteria, but missing confirmation by a second column or GC/MS (if appropriate). Also, reject ("R") all positive results not meeting retention tine window criteria unless associated standard compounds are similarly biased (i.e. base on RRT to DBC). 9.4 Check chronatograms for false negatives, especially for the multiple peak components toxaphene and PCB's. Were / there any false negatives? __ [_j_3 —— ACTION: If appropriate PCS standards were not analyzed, or if the lab performed no confirmation analysis, flag the appropriate data with an "RH. TUT 001 0339 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 35 of 36 * Date: March 1989 Revision 6 * Y E S N O N/A~ '0.0 CoTTPOUnd Ouantitatlon and Exported Detection Limits | "~ 10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in Fora I results? Check at least two positive values. / Were any errors found? __ f i/1 __ 1 NOTE: Siiiple peak pesticide results can be checked for rough agreement between quantitative results obtained on the two GC columns. The reviewer I should use professional judgement to decide whether a such larger concentration obtained on one column versus the other indicates the I presence of an interfering compound. If an interfering compound is indicated, the lower of the two values should be reported and ( qualified as presumptively present at an estimated quantity ("JN"). This necessitates a determination of an estimated concentration on the confirmation column. The narrative I should indicate that the presence of interferences ' has obscured the attenpt at a second column confirmation. I I 10..: Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions / and, for soils, sanple moisture? / [__] ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". ACTION: When a sanple is analyzed at acre than one dilution, the lowest CRQIs are used (unless a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher CRQL data from the diluted sanple analysis). Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration range in the original analysis by crossing out the "E" value on the original Form I and substi- tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted sanple. Specify which Form I is to be used, I then draw a red "X" across the entire page of all Form I's that should not be used, including any in the summary package. I II.0 ChromatooTam 11.1 Were baselines stable? r /I __ —— » 11.2 Were any electropositive displacement (negative / peaks) or unusual peaks seen? __ • C_l_] __ I 11.3 Were early eluting peaks (for early eluting / analytes) resolved to baseline? i ^_ ACTION: For 11.1 and 11.2, comment only. For 11.3, reject ("R") those analytes that are not sufficiently resolved. TUT 001 0340 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. . Page: 36 of 36 Date: March 1989 - Revision 6 YB3 NO~~ N/A 2.0 Field Duplicate? 12.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for VEST/KB / analysis? . ACTION: Ocnpare the reported results for field duplicates l and calculate the relative percent difference. ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate I results oust be addressed in the reviewer narrative. However, if large differences exist, identification of field duplicates should be I confirmed by contacting the saapler. I I I I _ I I I I I • | TUl" 001 034 \C\c <£ O3- ORGANICS LABORATORY RESPONSE TO RESULTS OF CCS J v \ ' j _ SAMPLE P t J5AJA 1/cVl Vc/\ H li 6 v \ v i COMMENTS OO c) / -I. ^f \Ci\ \c\ 1 o TU I ; VT . V - ( : > t r || ^ ^ I ..'-:• "4^ ..;(, '.-VyV;--;/^ • •*•'.* " -'n-.*^ -- : i J* .'.- '< - '••". , i if.~T «•><'_'»'i i'Mi'ilfri.'» . ^•J'jXTiTl'itV ••» : •: - -T'-vV:/'£?" r •• • ^ *• >_,• oUMMARY FORM Type of Review;_ Project: (No. of Crmponnds/No. of Fractions (Samples) ____________ Date; ' V/^3 /f" ^ CUse Lab Name: ( ( i ,li t r, Initials: fie. Number of Samples: Analytes Rejected Due to Exceeding Review Criteria; Acids (15) B/N (50) 3V TOA (3&) PEST (20) PCS (7) TCDO (1) Surrogates 0 V ^ ^^—— Holding Time O \ L__ Calibration 0 1J -/ (0 [ i ~^ — Cbn tarn i nation C> I la o — — _ ID o to 7 ^^— Other x? (Mfj *:jX / c> V -^__ Total N Samples AS l£ £1^ iS — — - —— _ Total i Rejected/ Total # in all Samples <3 A? -7J- V //2ZQ /(* _/_±u<-/ 26 /£?>d 7 / }7& — - — _. __ _ _ Analytes Estimated Due to Exceeding Review Criteria for; Acids (15) o O n 0 7<T ' B/N (50) 7(73) AC VGA C3a) fc H " c: PEST (20) o o ir OCR TOTO (1) | .£ Ji \>CLSed o»v G?C Lrt (suck CEIMIC CORPORATION DATE: H-n fllU_____ FAX| TO: £PA - (COMPANY NAME) ATTN: ' (NAME) l^\ FROM: ___ * 1J/1 » NUMBER OF PAGES *^ (INCLUDING COVERSHEET) RE: _________________ COMMENTS/INSTRUCTIONS: V *..-'u.«»> - i'^ V°A BX 2^-7 .S p^ct>-?v wiisipg -fW j BY 2^ u I H <i r/>« f <A c Drtn Knauss Drive, Narragansctt. R.I. 02882 • (401) 782-8900 • FAX (401) 7 of ' TUT ooi °345 In Reference to Case No(s): Contract Laboratory Program REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM Telephone Record Log Date of Call: '//'? 17 O_____________ Laboratory Name: C_,f- //*/? / Lab Contact: _ Region: ______ Regional Contact: /-«? . Call Initiated By: __ Laboratory * Region In reference to data for the following sample number(s): VoA Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed: Q (%Guhs LULL X 0 ' ^~ Summary of Resolution: ____4£t, T^- . Signature Date I ^ Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy I |UT CEIMIC CORPORATION / DATE: TO: ATTN: FROM: 729/70 FAX* I-2I-2-267-3QS7 JL (COMPANY NAME) (NAME) NUMBER CF PAGES RE; (INCLUDING COVERSHEET) COMMENTS/INSTRUCTIONS: 100 Dean Knauss Drive, Narragansett, R.[. 02882 • (401) 782-8900 • FAX (401) 782-8905 <-V V.3% ryi 001 0347 In Reference to Case No(s): Contract Laboratory Program REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM Telephone Record Log Date of Call: / A Laboratory Name: £ ^ ///? / Lab Contact: _ Region: _ Regional Contact: _ (¥o l) Call Initiated By: __ Laboratory * Region In reference to data for the following sample numbeKs): J" 2X-? Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed: ^A^j^/f, —— ' / 0 try 36G ft /., Summary of Resolution: Signature Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy /_ ^ 9- T 001 0348 TUT In Reference to Case No(s): / £ (-' 5 j Contract Laboratory Program REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM Date of Call: Laboratory Name: Lab Contact: Region: Regional Contact: Telephone Record Log i /i1? J c) o (/-,<< Call Initiated By: __ Laboratory -^ Region In reierence to data for the following sample numbeHs): w11 Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed: £' £^i Lite X Summary of Resolution: fJ " Signature Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy i^g <$ -9/17/V cs Date nn 001 0349 *-* _ _ .L. ._ _. ._ J- _ i_._..,t.t a.Cl. J Case MD.r 1205B M -I r IvO . ; — CM , I (J i tr Ls\'ci i ''. !"iGlE' Co:. u..T,n 5 . 0 Cg/mL) G_ Lab Sample 1C: 370107-01 Lab File ID: C0354 cure-, ret dec . S •'f:ac!.:/csp>) PACK Date Received: 0.5/08/35, Date Analyzed: 0671^/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ COMCENTPAT ICN UNITS: (ug/'L or ug/Kg) US/KG . 7 • > _ • : • - _ . T-__ ____ . __ _r L.. i r .rn £,._ .. _„ ' /'•! — r_7 — '-. — — — — — — — — — Eii"GftiGiTi& thane ; . ? -'.>l-4 — ----- ——— Vir.vl Chloride : ~r-'I >-7-- — -- —— -ri-.ioroe uhane 1 71-C'"-2-- — — ——— Methylene CMorice : 67-- :--i-l ——— - — • —— Acetone ! 7U-.J-0 —— ————— Carbon Di~ulfide ; 75 -,; ~. .-.;---•-• — ——— i , i-DjLc;-ilor set hen e ! /5-7^--,::.— ----- - —— ' ,l~D:.ehlcroethanc ; 540- :-;"._o--— ----- —— 1,2-Dichloroethsne (total) ; (f-y-i !.,--...-._•_- — — -CMcrcf crirj ; i I-7-;: •:.:-"'• — »•-•-• —— i .2-E'ichlorGethane : ~" ~ -'. "• -6------------1 , 1 . i -Trie: hi eras thane : ^c.--::7-:— - ——— ----- Cartcrn Titrr.cM'cr ide : -.: S- ' r: - " - • - - - - - - -----,':.r;\ I Acetate , ^ - .: - -,--- —— •----••E:-c-r.c-dic;-ilc;r.i>iT;~ t!-.ar.£? I ::G-(i7-7 •-• ———— ----. i H2 -DichlorGpropar.e lOOii-C J -=•-- — --L-is:-J. „ 7-Dich ] crcpropenc:. ! T-'.-'M-c;.------- — — -r- chlcroethene ! 124-^ B-l ——————— Di troriOC h 1 crcme thane- ; 7'-' •-.:•:.--=• ------ — -i,i,^-Tric!-.;orc3eth£.ne ; ~! - -7-2-- — ——— -Benzene ; .!.•:•:>.. 1-0 2 --6 — - — -Trans-i , 3-Diihloroprcpene ___ ! 7r ,— 2T — 2 — — — — — BromcfGr.Ti ! '.'I'S-l >-l- •• — -- —— -4-Methy 1-2-Pe-n tananc- ! 5 ••/•!- /S-<£: — — ——— 2-Hexe-.r.one , 127- 1 3-4-- ——— •— --T-trac-lar-ethene ! 79-7-1--=.- ——————— 1 , 1,2,2-Tetrachlcroethr-ne ____ , iO-- :-7--_.---- - •-' -T-jiUtrnt: : 103-~ ;- - 7 - - - - - - - -- —— Chl crcte r-izene 1 1 1 : -;i-^ -•-•- —— ----Ethvl benzene : i :••:•- -•;:;- = .-—-- —— stvrene ; :77 ;-_:>- 7- ---- — -----7jtal X \ l f - n e s 11 .J- O- •1 •• 1 I c *= v^ f ) c e; c 11 er. c- c: 5 e; c: 4 4 5 rr -J i i B ' • U U t_r U U U U U L) ' U U U U 1 1 U 1 1 U U U U U L) U 178 1/S7 Rev, TUT O01 0350 BT74S Contract: 6SD90028 L_c- ~ V 1 li::: •_ i" 1 | i_i:VtI V. Mc.ii * CclUiTif 1 1 ( U 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I ^ • : _. .. r- • — T . .; L. • *... ! *. j. :: f s - - I 5 U t / V D l : ( I c 2-cura: r 1-1- C:-.£P N'-.; i---.fP ' =^q r-,.: T-F N- • F — 47 /;-.'c.-ter; SOIL Lib Sample 1C: S90107-'"»2 i 5.0 (-;/A;L) G Lat File ID: C0355 .•j/nca) LOW Date Received: 06/OG/S9 ot dec:. 9 Date Analvzed: 06/15/G9 "i : i pack/cap ; PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0 .—• r r-* K • r '-j l-i O i -1 L. 74-83- 75-0°- 7 IT 4 r_: 67-66- 71 ••-•:. T- -i. - . j " • CONCENTRATION UNITS: COMPOUND (L'.g/L cr ug/Kg) LJG/I-G G -:_. __ ______ -C I"-] cr-:--£;th = r,i= •::...___.. —— . _ .. 5 r 0 ffl 0 ,, K_, a- ... -; n _ •'. -.... -. ————— .', jir. v/ ] Ch ! or lde ">- — •- — -- — -- Chl oroe thsne 2- — — ——— Methyisne Chloride ^ ....._ ———— — Acetone - • •- — U a t D O i I LJ -. 5 U a. i 1 0 e 4- — - ———— i , 1-Dichloroethsne -_ —— — — _j ^ l-Dichlcrccthane -0-- — - ———— .1 , 2-Dichlcro£thene ; total } 3- — - ———— Chlorof ore, _ -^ _ ._ _ _ _ _ . . _ \ l~\ r\ .: — i.. i ... _ ;_ i. _ _ .1 , ^_ .'-' .^ l_ i i j. __: 1 _' C. TI i . *r\ n cr -••... .- — —— --2- B.; t£. none ,/.........._ — .. — ... i ^ <_ ^ i-.-r- -[-,] -.rni=i-h,--ne i- ..... .._. ... __._._ 'c.. r 'Den Te t ra c t~. i orid^ .:. _. ...... . ——— -V i n y i •"-;,: e t.=-. ts — rr -•' — r - £. _. _ ,; _• _ j__ -. ___ ___„.-.. |_ _ ^. ,_. — T f—. /n— * / o "~ w . — 79-01- —T rr .___'—. rr _ 10S-10 JL .*_ / """ JL LJ 79-34- 10G-9T. 100-4. 1C 0-4 2 *:.•--••- — - — -1 . 2 -Die hi ore pro pane " 1 5 - - - - - —— ciE-1 , 3-Dichlcropropene o • - •- Trichloroethsne .._! .. _. ————— Dibro.T.-'ChloroiTiethane 1^- ----- — ---.i. ,!.-_' i r;.ch I. j roe than r- 2 .-- — ---.. — }:' c- .. r ^ o- r, e 02 6-- — - — -Trans-1 , 3-Dichloroprcpc-ne 2-— -- ——— - — E romo f o r m _-i_ _...-._.._. — 4-Methyl-2-Per,t£nanrr _.^._. — — . —— 2-r-:e.-;£,nc-£? _ 4 . ————— . —— - .... T e '- j.- -, _ j- ^ _ r _ e a. j_, e j_ e 5-- —————— 1 ,1,2, 2-TE trachloroethancr -.3... _— .— „ -Jcli.. .^nc .. 7- _._....... —— Cnl orobujn zene _. .5 .........__. —— E t h y 1 b CT n n: e n e -;-.—— ———— Styrtne •:- -7 —— — - -Total X ,-lenes 4 4 ^ _L •* ^ 11 67 11 =, 5 5 5 •i -4 J. JL cr -^ JL 5 C 5 ir w' cr rr^ 11 11 5 cr. ifte ; i U U • ii.j r; u L' u lj L! 1 ' 1 I >_• i • »..' u u - U L! U U ; t L! U u u u ;j u u u L1 m FORK I VGA TUT O01 O351 r K> > < 6 o o- t l CO CO c h- r- x f CU 0 -0 CO ii-; (•- «• o K> x x P • Cr- o -0 o a ca LJ •_•• o .-' ~ [IJ rs p n -o UJ n •• ill iU P > N 11! i-i -,H •>. Cli • < 01 -i C J 11- ill i J 113 O l~ rl _I]J j. cr- in LL P 0) QJ co n a 4-t .p H- -IJ ili iTi i5 ij U J .J P |?J 1:1 -r 4-' co u a 'i i-- vl X. i- +-' en ' r c -rr t- a CD CJ Cil 1- . LU r rj ;- co _ J L 'i X- '.. <C C .J '- C'i t -'£ »••! U1 Cfi -• --• LJ M o "* T'" •'"*( "i "' .J "• q- i. "' ij t~< u".! j£ T-I Ul CJ D C! 113 CO .J a. cj L' L- -J CJ L — ij ^ f_! Ul TJ PJ r - 4 -! IjJ TJ <.: LJ LJ * e _J •— ' >-' 3 x -p u i- r --. •• 2 n : - f-i r i r-H rH G ^ I'j I'J •••! 0 •-* i. '! L.) i; > U x 01 •j L_ il UJ • ^ ~i i:- C •" -P J;! :'J •' 0 •• iji x- a tii u a j; 4-. t > n \ . ; 'M r; ai / . i: en .j ;; 'C ^.( ~". •.H i a « ii 4J CO x U h- CM >TJ i—. "j LL J!!:j ~ C 0' o z it 4J n IJI -J H -J •^ <L ••H ct: L. P 1- 0 T' 01 -J LJ -«. Z ai a 3 u ~ p "Z. ~~\a CLj- ii CJ u u CL L- *-*a •su V. ^. ' u o fS Z CL CO •;£ U *• C ."i r-1 O l_) I ,-vj'J t'J CJ CJ KI ~i3 -.0 O <i -0 0 --a rj -0 ~.i CJ •:; 0 -j -0 C, -O -rs -r; vO C'-J CJ -J <i -0 -4j •-? -0 -0 j, i r~\ T-, T-I -0 <i • ! • -H -H • f ,-i i.ti CJ 4-1 III !H i1! o c a j: 4-' til U IU 0 4-1 — c iu u a. oi t: L. m QJ us 1:3 i: & o i: 'u CL t: o 01 Oi 01 Ol 111 SI .-\ j C L :lj £. 0 O L -j c i; c c 4J L j: iri a j; -P L t: Oi o H Oi ui rj oi >s ti rj -<j a. u 4-" ii! o 1-5 c •-> t- -Dxrjijj j_ tjr-< u n i, ai QJ Q -• 4-" aix: 111 0 -H 4J .4-" 4J 4-' L XT i : L ij C K L. Jl C J^ 1 i iy TJ --H 'i- o 01 oi 0! o ij u rj a .- < ii! o o u oi ±> a oi ui c 0! -H iu j: ~t o a o o •-< ID -u L. 'u x: JT v. -< •••< LL in L c oi oi ij C L C U n '- L l- L I. L. .:• ;J L IJ 4J ;J JI P ! 0 4-J IjJ C C J- Ti C M ij U 0 0 C 0 111 UP P .< U -H 0! r-i U 1 CJ PJ ^ ill N IU ili ij J^ rH J- Hi ;-\ r-t r+ •-» L r^ |" -1 li.i i!j jl --1 P D J. 'H K! £ ! U 0 \- \~ H r-> IJ 4-' j^ P t P i: .J.: i: fj JI :j 1- i - U !J -T- ! L ij L '• L -i IJ f< !U C >- e ai cj ci oi oi u u u i- u r v- <i •< u r-j o a i-- o •• i o > c: J- o uj jj m iu x a K o -< r: c -H -H --i Q -H m i c u --i ' - - - 1 ^ 1 c ' v x: 10 u » c a 11 u L n rH L. >. U 0 P P P L P 4-J r-H Q -H ij P -rH JT J] f J 111 l/l 0 •>•' X 'C CJ U ^- •"• 01 -1 o t; :>. n j: 4-1 xi i I o i d •• n >• f= i u L •• N r. £ 01 oi L » ;j a > L is rt ri c --i -i-1 in L H -.-{ rj .-H cj nj *H L c u CJ ui -H n *-t r. <:< u i: :c 4J ,-< r-i r< j: >. i.> J_ L -H JI 111 U iU '• r. ». x: '• 1 *• i-j ••-! L ' -H L -H •• ijj L. i. i i <•! •• O XI 4-> ^J f j u a"! > cj r: <i rj TH TH ,-i rj -4 ri T! u :> PJ -H L i- p --i ai K m ^r cj i~ -i H cj UJ a. H- i i i i i i i i i i i i ; i i i t i l l i i i i : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 i ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i ! 1 1 1 1 i i I 1 ' I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 II 1 I I I I ! i i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ! 1 ! i i i I I I ! 1 1 1 1 i 1 i i ! 1 1 i 1 1 ! 1 i i 1 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I ! ! ! ! 1 UJ 1 -JJ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ! 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 I > 1 t ! I 1 1 ! 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 t • 1 1 i 1 I ! 1 O i C J I 1 •:* i T- ,-n i Cl I --* O «r K1 r- <t Ui ! r i a- T KI c-j *H o "-t ••"< i n i KI -a uj i «.,- ui ••••> -n u; M •..;• rj ii uj i i ' i -.:• i 1 i 1 1 1 1 O 1 O ! 1 1 in ; i l CO i 1 1 O CO C3 I'D O • i C-J U f- K' -H O C- «* a'l u; <.f UJ -Jj O KI u:i t-i • ,- t-- T-- -H ••* *t O KI "4 u"'. -'. r- '- T en Cr- ^ •-.- ! en 'o .... •:.• o •# TH KI --. i a i :,- UMN : u v. -o o i o vi --o c-j ! i i K> i i i i •:•.• i i i 1 i i i o i r- i i uj i o <r ; •'• i co »H r^ i c. c:' o c> t •'•• ff cf u -, L:I in |x u^ ui u~i <1- |-x o OJ 'H U •:.' a'> CO O G- CJ 0- TH ..... tj o Ci- CJ u- O O O O -"i I ^ - . [V -. fN. <l TV |-> (x. L'"J -0 ^H r% f-. |ij .• J fv f. TI f-. r-\ ?•* f- --I f--. -rH Uj 'H T- '4 .-I ^4 »H i-l ) j 0 s ^ LE rTSANICS ANALYSIS T\'-,TA SI-'EET Contract; ASD9002^ Lab Code: CrTMIC C&r-e Mo.: 12058 SAS No.: ^ K*l _. 1- ... 4 . , r /,— .., J I .' . . _ _L __ ... \ r^ *-l T I | I ivu-. tr j. X : v i" C - 1 / w ei L. E f ) "• ...' 1 L S-arTi,-_'l t? i-.it/vcl;. 5 . 0 I Level: (low/(Tied) LDW :; Moisture: net dec. __16 Cclj.rr.n: (pack-/cap) PACK CAS r.;C. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: G___ Lab File ID: Date nieceiveds Date Analyzed: Dilution Facto CONCENJRATICN UNITS: (u g / L o r u a /K g ) L'G/K ERA SAMPLE NC BX262 Me.; ST747 39O1Q7-04 • C0357______ 06/OG/S9 •'•6/15/S9 r: 1. 0_____ hane —r r- f~ •* T i i j _ . . n r~- L. i _. ._ J «J ^^ . w-"• '•- - — < — —"• — — — — ——.- j. i i y j. u i : J. LJf J. ue 75-0-3-3 —— — -———Cnl oroe thane '5-09-2 — -—————Methylene Chloride, ' —' / /i < o / — ft 4—1- retone 5-15-0————————Car ben Disulf ide. 75 -35-4 —— ————— 1,1-Dichloroethene,_______ 75-34-3— —————— 1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total ). 67-66-3--———————Chloroform________ ________ 07-06-2———————1,2-Dichlorcethane. 8-93-7-- --————2-Butancne 71-55--6—-——-——i , 1, l-Trichloroethane_ 56-2""-^- ———-——Carbcn Tetrach] cride_ ' ''""-''. r~ - 4—— — — ———— Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-2.'-- -—- —— — 9rcr,-.cdichlc;rcf7,sthar-,e. 73-S7-5-------- —— l ., 2-Dichlc!rapropane_ 10061- 01- 5 — -——cis- 1 , 3—Dichloropf 79-01-6----————Triehioroethene_ ll'-l-'-'U-v-l — ————DibroiT:ochloromethane__ •--.•..../-..-..'-__.——......—— ^ __ ji ? 2-Trichloroethsne. 71 "•-.'••-2-——-———Benzene . ___ .0-I'il•1-02-6-—---Trans-1 . 3-Dichloropropene_ r5-25--2--——————Bromororm________ __ _______ 103-10-1-—-———4-Ketny1-2-Pentanone 591-73-fc-—————2-Hex 127-12-4————---—Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-5-———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorc-e-thane. 108-SE-3-———————Toluene _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ 103-90-7-———————Chlorobenzene. 100-^1-4—————Ethyl benzene J J-'.-'. -Styrene_ 1 c.30-20-/--————Total X y lenes 6- fa A 12 6 6 6 t 6 Q LJ !J B B Uu U {J u u 6 U 6 'J 6 U 6 L) 6 U 6 U U LJ uu [_1 u u u u u FORK I VGA 198 001 035:3 CPA '9Ar--!PLF MO. • i...».;_ ••_... . >. v i~>:'•; i '. :^ I-,i .!• it— V —— * |— • —, -I I f - . • • T —. ——T i-i- T |— T i ' £-'•< • *- i J T*r_L. i _• i L-.c-i i j r• a i I Level: "/: r.oisU; I C CD lu,••.-,;-, r~- -. ,.. j. ._. _ ._ 4. . .• r- t*\ r-i ,-,,•%'-i i_ s_-! . '.. i CT ' - t. . r •_; i_- •: i. '.' J. ( j ^vv/iTieiu ) LCw___ :•: n c t d 03 c . ':, 6 P3.ck/or,p; FACi"! Lab Garnplc; ID: G°O107-04 _^b File ID: C03^7 E^.te Rscsiv&d: 06/09/89 Date Analyred: 06/1^/89 -i1at ion Fac tcr: i.0____ r-- n» i r~ r* K i n-1-. .--. T- T r~i K i i 11.1 T ~r r~ , uUi-ii-.Ln i r P- i IL-'I-.' uiii i s . •'u.q/L. c:;- uq/Kc) U3/K£ r^ r"- n i-. i—. ( i u i T-- » ; ,-» KX r— ^L.'i if LJW/.H*.' . i"-,i iJl TUT 001 0354 I VGA-TIC H _ L 'i 0 a C- "^ .*- -.- - X C 'I-N 1 * .- -C ri u* V *) _! C H O0 i— *• o rjl cn ( ' f* ! ' t * !• -» K-» ---4 !-• >.n v-4 O •.:• O O --0 M -0 n-l o ••:;• c:! co i -4 ^-* ••:• i i i i I.--J i i 1 •(-• .ft- -0 OJ 4i t- -4 f .: M )-' O .'0 ! ITj f.'(l •:•• l i i t '.n i i ! in .ii -,| , ,j ! j» rj- • 4 1 I i ; II ! ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ! 1 ! I 1 1 H ui m n H t-* -i M n rt ,-t rr o * ru I rt x; -_T i--1 <-> <-•• ft I ?i T < ci f,: •' -, ni »— rn >»' T R t J ?i - n cr o ri * n f.i r-': fij m tr m t-j :r n x- rj i? l t- D •- N n H o " 1 m in i-j m - m u r: ITI rt n fD IT) 3 1 ID in 2 !' rt n rr rr ro 0 iti i -1 0 1!rtrr "1n rti !•-•• C- cr cr- Cr- &- r> o- ^ c t c c L: c c; cr I-* '-4 !•- •::• <.n o O 1 0 i ro cr- K« rjl i-» 0 1 1 1 f-.l 0- M ! i J ! 1 1 rr- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l> 01 --I 1 T T :r o pi ITJ 3 n rt 0 in rr -t. i x' 0 t--- K-. T -. 1 3 i» t-.l I 1 U TJ H- in n ?• rr ri- "--• D! 0 n T Cl 0 n n itl -0 D ro D ft! . *•* >••• c- o- c c: c -1 -4 ^ -0 1 1 b C' 1 0 1 1 J ' ni i 3 H- •J ••• n i* j •« n r-J i i Tl • ! T H-nrr >-•uT 1.! r.]ii:.t PIjn > i> .. c M xj t-» -.4 - j l ' r n rO -0 O CO rn .-; r-, ^ i •.:• i : n l l o cr tn !J l t.i J-, ,_L w* -.j v| ,;, ,;.j CO 1 1 1 1 '.-I ! 1 i> o .-n •'- ' i..n i • ^ i -.-. l l l i i ri 1 ' i 1 I I I 1 i i I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 ! 1 ! m H n ^ r.ri -.•: n t- 1- T H- * ^ I-- !'" rr H- in rj r.i n T T n l i 3 •< r:r n rr r-» t.3 n i-- :.i ^ j-j -^ H- Q. II o Q u n »•• ~t> n T i :r n n -i rr u rj •- :/ in m »-•• ITi !-'• 0 i--1 rt rf- Ci r»- n "i f PI i 1 rr rr o - rt- r' o m •-• T] n i;- n n r.1 o T -.3 :r rj n i n ri >- rt O -D ri- fi rr TJ r.' rr ~ pj T n :;.' !-•• n n ro n a ro t 1 MI ra ron (Ti h cr- c- r> i> rr- :- c c c c: c u t: ': ; I •-.4 -i H- Cr r.n -j -..| -j i> vj j . | | • j K' GJ O ••-! -?» rjl r.i r.n -.4 rn rn ..1 4i -^ ! 1 - 4 1 O ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! <n -n i cr- i U <.•( i- r> O o o co nj rn i.-'l O l> tn -•» U1 rjl 4j --0 o H r.| • .J i ' o- I -n I i i i I i i i i r '••! i i..-J i i,-) -tJ o i--1 M i i -^ -n '.--I 1 t.l O 1 ! 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I ! I I ! K- 1 1 t- n t- >-» *-* n j,< ii n ••: m n i •* rr •' •• •' PI n o T H- i • r Hx I'.' tJ *-• U ^ (-- T (Tl rt •"• n U •-•• - <~ i a ! 1 ! cr rt rr n x: =1 o H rh tl -i U U U O 0 •<• 1 -- 0 1 i HI p- n H- >'• H- n n •"• o ri n H n n ••*. n n n m ft rn n p< -i i Q rr rj rr rr rr u n ,-i rr rt rg (••• J t-J "1 t~- »-J i--1 !-'• ID -r H-. -f rt ri m o D a n a in pi u a> IT rr ~ -; - -i r: o n T :.-• /> I-- p no ii >- rr m i-j ro n o ro m 11 ra -!. i--' a "i 1 rt rt ri ,t '" 0 fli ri rr rr rr rr ct T ru !!• rri EI rn rn > j- •••!• r! n n n a ~T in IT; f[! m n 'Tin III rt 0it n- K-» *-,• ! i '-' h* 1 * • •> i - ! ' ij- t-1 0- cr o rr- i> i> j.» -i >• !l i-- :-x c: c n: >_ c: c: c: c c c: :; c •:: u .• r in ;< . ( c; rn -y f. •;. i 7C < -i rr rr c o !ji TI -'. "\ \>- ^-• i— H :'! n 10 " IT! ;.; r; ft " L'L ri tr: .? rti l> -n ,-.- rn - - in -•-.. -.; T] ••- .- -.; u r' PI •- c1 !-•• n r i n :i r< > - K- » i 7- ci 5; -• --, :•: n- --. r ' -i n :i si : ) •-.I a. m ,t n (ii a r-i ^-- n ^.- -j t -..^ n •n r in '! J> o c) in n n '-•• £ m 1-1 HI ci :-- n - r -.i. o -T Tl r: 0c:;;. mi • rj D M r -n rn ro ! ( , ; T) — n vt c_- n ID ;r ;•: x n fi r n :. n H tn r i i i \" r -", TJ H. r/ ii, i, ij. I> >-• ii- rt IT cr C H f 0 IB ID >~« ,t "i tn x n h'- "•> -n '•• r-i ~ Z O -1 iTi •-' ?.l :-n r* f n ri -M --- c rr i » • ;; TI -. |... • < fi »-- n HI : i ...- ; i rrj H ri n iy: -• n i • , ID rt ^ LL r..l : 1 -r .. n " •• -• (0 !j'J • « :'-;, ,;-, n -.j IJ i-- r>- ;•> o 0 X •-,. \{ ^ rr- r:j , J • •• v! -i H n co m i -i -0 -o •::• ,-.T -I • r ^ I'; fri :'ln '- 1 ~ >".< » 4 i —— 1 ) _ | ! 1 --', o r ,1 1 1 TJ t •J ; 'i T> - r £ - M l.'i T> • T ;;=i u'in ;:'! n 1.1 i i "' H ~ - ~> -; 'i n • ' r :" i.) i 1 r- i ci : 1 -0 -,n :'l . . .. . j L , r,; '" 1 7. ra i- -- • i n Hi 3 11n rt r.i Q in p; •n 5' ~*j f.i rr Cla — ii1 II ;;3 V H-nrr :a 3 -.-; i—t 'u "•"•I l-.:. HI H'l 1 ( ( H' (JI M UJ t'3 tO -0 OI -0 0 O O r-1 1 '. J ! X| IJI i -i i i,-i i i ?-3 o •: i t ) ::• -43 4> i -M i CO -43 1 .-i 1 03 i 1 rO 1 r.n 1 0 tO 1 ! i 1 1 1 ! i 1 1 ! i i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 ! 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i ! 1 1 W rj M m irj rn i;i ••-••• 3 ft rn nj 3 rr ct 3 3 D M 01 HI N f-4 N n 3 3 ci o o -~. M Cl ~ — . -— •u ^, .-. n, rr Q- . i), ^ ^ -,, — rr •- ••• TI TI TI ' rr t-.3 •< >•-• r ••• I .. ._.. -j -r( r- r; -- 3> o< ro b 5 TJ 3 i 3 T T in rt n rti PJ rn T rr a 33 -f. ~ -' rt rt i— 9. TJ "r T Hi n •< UJ H) 3 0! T 33 m 3 rri mm 01 3m ' 4 04 0-< C4 04 0-J 03 03 CO CO 03 CO O O O O O O c: c •:: cr c c X) O h' M x| 1ill J-. 1 l""1! O H- 1 3 1 Onrt X' 1— • 11 rrrtrr P.'^j 1'rt m 04 03 O C H- 1-'-J 1 03 r.* \ 4 rr H- in x^. t .1im n-rr ^<;' *-J D" rn s,r' i— • *_x TI rrrtrr BI»-• a>rt Oi J> 03 r_i ( to m -o 03 i--1 M m i-- m n ^ !•» C3 in i--* rn xi co i •* t-» >--• rn m -ri t- r> i-- m to o •£> ro en x| r' o rr- oj o o O -fc to 0-! o M o; >rj CO 1 1 1 -13 r> 1 O 1 i 03 r* 1 4'» O 1 O 1 f- (0 O 1 1 1 I rn -o rr- i i --j j •;;• iji i ; • - • - ! ! I xi r.n r> i i I ;..i u o O in ^ rn o .t» 4» h-' M ;> -I in o '.n <-* oi I cr- ^ 0- o en •) -ri M i i i o j* i to i i •-•• <-' i n o \ xi i .fi ja to i i i I U !"• x| 1 ! M 1 Q.I r.n I i 0 I 1 x| M t .1 1 | 1 rn -0 j-.j - O i l ! O O 1 x| l ! i-' * ! ' (•- r> i l | fO -43 -1 I ! i 1 1 1 i i i 1 1 1 ! ! i 1 1 1 1 '--I 1 ! i 1 1 1 1 1 ! i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I ! 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 ! 1 1 i 1 1 1 ! 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! i 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 ! 1 i 1 1 ! 1 ! 1 1 ! i 1 1 1 1 i ! ! ! 1 1 ! ! i 1 I I I ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 ! ! i 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! i ! ! ! 1 1 1 1 I I ! ! n rji u ifl "i "n rj T> n TJ ;r _r-> 2 .s .(.-, TJ _t> tj ro rj & io 1-- • :i •T m •* r • :' K- i- • -J -j rii :"; i 1 •• ! •--• 1 I ••• ' !••• 1 •> fi | "i 3 t. J rr 'i C. 1 rr n 3 : i.1.1 ?.* l> 7'. C O HI J-> CT '?. 4* ITi 7* < r i - < "J Ci 3 T 3 rr LI* • -i ui- I <-•• O rr , r 1 Hi i-1- 1 3 • •- in D 1 >--• 3 -j 1 - B1 ''I si Ci rr o ,-i- i •--• ;r tr) 3 rr r-\ in ,t Oi ^-. ".' rr n.s in w ri n n :r -•; -• »-•• ~ rn 0 xr w- 14 i H- TI i 3 Ci h'- III 3 C fi rr "T " Ci 0 3 !"| 3 1 i-* 3 Ti P 3 T O ill ~ n 3 rt rt iTi rr •-•-' f! TI in I-" U1 OI 0 T! V" -t. T3 H- r>~ pi j> ;r (•< :.r x: 3 -; n -, rr c it 3 n :r r-t c T . -s u n 3 •- < n i- m Oi ~ o rn CL T :-•• ir rr T T n.i 'i TJ t-.. rr 0 >•-• 3 TI ri 1 1 rr ri H- rj *-• ru ;r O Oi 3 ci ri !-• T T TI it! ;r ft! TI r.l -< TJ ! H- 3 fi. rt 3 O T] 01 H- T u rr rt rr n r • rr to 3 -< K-- o t--1 ;r 3 C> rr r* 3" rn n | Oi i fti ^ <n t-j o* ffi n 01 rr & 3 i- r; n :-c ! n r: Z1 m 3 ji i-' Q r1 rr < Oi TJ :a 01 o 3 u >-•• Hi (-• 0! PI >— • 11 rr 3 »--• Oi H- ci rt 3 <i< rr m rrj a rt ra -< D •< -i p. |J) i-J H HJ V 3 Pi 3 TJ ^-J o rt HI rr Oi rr ;Ti it ITI '-•• 3 rr -; ! A r.i TI »-• ^-•• "I . I.A h' M I--1 i-' i-l i>4 4 1,4 vJ Ll 'VJ 01 vJ -43 •: J i 1 ' 1 -n -3 01 'I i.| OJ OJ -43 --0 '4 -il Oi ra -4 ro 1.0 ro 03 ro 03 c- M ri ro o o co ru co ci en o o rn o o o o o o o o o o o •."-• o o o •"•• o o c- o o o ••':• o o c c: r: c c c c c c c.: r: c: c: c ci c: c: c: c.: c rr c c c co i-i ;< i CM ..•.'. i TJ r: m t a. n. n rr II < 3 rt LT -i 0 rn TJ ~ n Cj M K-- >--• »-•• r"; >-• n in I., m ;; n 0: rt ft .. a n a* !-• c. .E m 35 3 O T rr (.1 rr: 3 0! • x. in TI " " —— «" 0 |:'1 '::: •• i- o p- !rn O 3 0 '-' ^-l »- ( n 5- •• x. ^ rt x 2 •~- r/j '-i ju fj < oi a in ,t 11 01 li m z -o n ^ -| n i. j '?. [i r- i;i HI 3 o ! •! r3 m I 'J rt !•-• T. O n 01 LJ -x 4a • |- :: o'j r> -• •'i n o CJ 3 i :: n — '.C r- a TJ ill 13 iO T. n r- •;;• ,. = .^ f n ro m m n 4 n !-"• :,3 T- - n iji r ri ih '-^ '•"•' •--. ri a r- n "' •« u H t.3 a u o r r •| ,Ji i-1- fl^ & ai a.' in - I- »-• it ft rt cr cr !/ -i rr oi m m 'U n rt T| rrj --. C3 H. T> m rri ! • • • ;ji — Z 0 3 ;•; iTi i- I- iQ 3 pi rt 0 0! Tj •- c H.. T rr, ~ •_.- TI •< 3.1 M- n rn r: M a. N n < cj fji -H n Oi rt ra •• i-t rn ••-. r j i r t a m a i j u i • .- n .• ci •« •• C3 !'.,:i T o o o T-, n r," <-- -4 ^ fj- M. .11 v x t3 O iT- h 03 x| O TI xl H •' i 03 CO 03 ! -1 •0 -0 -0 O *" rji -4 r { •r',. QI Oi |H i 1 n rn ji • i ii i^ * _'>. j- i1"1 :; r - In : :.• in H ;ii •-^ Tl j -h n • i UJ T-,'r ' — f - T i J ~.T 7,-, r - -.; rj3 n •• < D f!J 3rt r.i rii --: !""' _i-: it •n rr ni 03 H in -i 1?x to CO -- -- _. 1 n m --j :••< J^ !0 r,- .1 oi :o T Ti rn jC. CO , ,- ....... ,_. _ - _ . ip pT _ ... - . , , . . , \_,.— rr- -.- r.-r .'• ~'.•TT'T' • _•;_. ' -. , .1 .... i:. ... .. i -. • - . . _ . . : . , • . < I- I L- . -' ... _' •••• i'. I n ... . i ._ .... i i. •:. b L' c r!;.: : T IT i ratrix: f <:C.i 1 ,'uatcr ; £ ScA.T.ple ,,t ,' vc 1 r. Level: ( 1 a w / «i e ci) LDUJ "/. MeiEtu.r&r not d e c . _1": (pack/cap; PACK ,'g/nL) GAS MD. CItPCUND IPA SMIF'LE BX264 ZD5 Me ., : E77T Lab Sample ID: C-010"?-06_ Lab File: ID: CC3&T. Date Received: C(WOC/S9 Date Anslvzeccj: v&/l£ .'S° Dilution Factcr: i .,.• CDNCENTRATTC:^ L'NITE: (uq/L c;r ug/Kg) 74--S3 ---—--•— — Bromc^ie rhane ________________ i — '"_".-' _ ••' _ __ _ „ _ _ '• -• : ^ i i r~ i... i ._ ... _• _: _ i / % . . • • . „ * . -T . ^. , i •-: 1 s... . . ... •_• , „ Lj ^ _____________________________ . 75-0'; •-3~-----------Chioraot'",,-ne_________________: 75-09-2- -----———Ms thy ler-;e- Chl or ids___________1 67-6A-1-————- — Acetone______________________: 75--11: -'!•——————--Carbcri risL.l fide____________: 75-35-4——————-—1 , l-Dicl-iloroethsne___________i 75-3A-3————- — — ijl-DicMorce-thsne___________! 540-59-C- — -———-1,2-Dichlorcethene ( tat*l ) __I 67-cl:,-3--—-- ——— Chl -z-rcf c:~n____________________! l'.:7-;:,i - - 2 - ---•-.-.—-i ,::-Oic'-lcroeth?re___________! 7C---7-7- —— --———--Dutanope...__________________' 7i-r75--c.-—- — -----.1 . 1 , 1-Tr.ic!-.] oroathane________! 5^-2"-5-- — •-—---C;,r i-cr Tttrarhlcririe _________' 7 r.: :< • 27" --4 ••- --..----- Er-;:n.-^:ic 7G-S7-5 - - — --—-1 . 2-"-icMaroprcpsns__________! j OCA: -01-5----—-c: =•-! . 3-Dichlcrcpr openr:______1 7o._cl._A——-----——Trichlcroethene_____________! j2-^--8-j.--—-——-Dibromc-chlorcT.e thane________! 7~- •:--i,-,-^-....--......__-_, i, 2"Tr.ichlarciet'-iar,e________! -•; ._^-._-2 -•—---..-— p - i-zer.K'__ ________ _________' ... C Ool- 02-- =- -----Trr.ns; - j. , 3-Die: hi era pro pens___i 10S-1C-1—-•---——-—r'.ethv 1-2-Fentancns i 591-73-6------——-2-Kexancne-___________________! 127-o.S-v-—— —— — TetrachicrGe thene ___________1 79--::.^-:. —— —————-1 ,1,2,2-Tetrschlcrocthanc____! ^;.-3-8P--3-- —————— Toluene______________________! 1;..' i!: - ?'"- - 7 - ———- - -C h 1 o r c h e n z E rie_______________! 100-41 - •-'• •- -- ———£•_ hv 1 Ler- zene-_________________! 1 'I 0 • - -T 2 -• 5 - - - —- - - •• - '£ I", v r e n e. _______________________ i 1T30-2C-7 — — — — T-tal >:/Ter.es______ ________I . 1 11 ••} 6 6 6 6 11 6 ' U 6 6 . ( 3 t 6 & 11 6 6 A t 6 t 6 ;u ; L! \ \ \ ; Li : u :u ,u ; v : •~ ;. 1 : L1 :u iu :•,'. ;u ; j i;j i •_' :LJ ! U ;u ;u :u iL' :u :L; rent-: i VGA- TUT 001 0357 f i '.--, i f- ••- T i i— .— r~i c* /•* K i T i—' r^ r i t r, \ \ / r-* T t~* r- r\ "r- , -....._*-. i a i_L_ '....-• --Oh-if -! j _.-o r .r!i--L_ i -^ i -:J u-f-i i BX265 ,r; ;j;,;:c: rCIMJC CORP Contract: c-SD?OQ23 SDG Mo.s ET747 I : <rb r.:c-:!-?r ''T. ~ K T C Case Mo.; 12058 SAS No.: _._____ | tfs.tr.-,;;: i sai 1 / *••• s t e r) SOIL Lab Sample ID: S90107-07 le ..:t.Vol: 5.0 (g/mL) 3___ Lab File ID: 30364 Level: r r-;. r,ot de-c: . .'picl.:/csp) PACK Date Received: 06/08/39 Date Analyzed: 06/16/S9 Di In tier. Factor: 1. 0______ COMPOUND CCNCEMTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG FORM I VGA 1 of M33 TUT oo i 0 — 1 . • I "* f . "T — - r-. .' i_" o .-' .•• ,_ — » r^ / J ~r c / - 67 .'.. C 1 •~"~.i , ...... — r •< • J. '„-'• 11' ' -• ;. T- «, — . ... 1C 4 —— , -L *_ -r '- 71 ^ * — • cr. ;..•: = 9 * — 79 < •; ^ !' ' r i ••• .j. ' . • — ---;7-7 ----- —— - —— i~:h lore methane -P7-9— -- —————— Brc.mom& thane --: I--":- — - ———— Vinyl Chloride . -' -• •._ . i I U/ 1 C t. •_ , nr.; i tr -• - " ~- ' PI 2 i. i i y i tr i t S U J ! J. LJ f i Q G' -c/4-1--- ——— ——Acetone I I — - f » L _ T ^ ' ^ ^ * _ 1 •i. •-• '-' — Lea Don i-iSL.il fide -35-4-—- — ——— 1 , 1-Dichlcrcethenc -^i--- • 1,1 Dicnlt-jroethane 0- '5 ":'-0 ------ ——— i , 2-Dichlorcethene (total ) __ -^c -..-• - • Chloroform 7-06-2 —— - ———— 1 ,2-Dichloroethane -97,. ..-3-- — ———— 2-Butanone -r-5 6 —— •- ———— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichlorcet.hane — .-•'.- •-— — — — — — — —— L,arbon i s traohlor ide i -. . -;. -.4 -- - -----Vir.v 1 fVetate 7.T*-'i - - — • - — — - - E'r orncd i c: h 1 crorr.e t har.e S, •_.- • • 1 , 2 -D.ichl orcpropane C:: I -OJ - 5 -- — --cis-1. , 3-Dichl crcpropene -•'". '. -6 ----- ——— - —— Trichl oroethene 4- •£.%- i- —— ——— Dibromoc hi or erne thane -CO- 5 —————— - — i , i ,2-Tr.tchlGrcethana -•3 -2 ------ — • — B0-nz£-rs "; .'.^ i •"' ~ - 6 •- - —— - - T r a n <=- - i , 3 - D i c h 1 o r n D r o p s n e -1:^-2 ——— -: ——— Src-o-form 3-iO-l — - ————— 4-Methy 1-2-Fen tsncne i__. ,5 .-,---- ———— 2-Hexanone 7- !'-: -4-- ————— Tetrac hi oroethene -3-T-^- - —————— 1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachlcroethane B-crE-3- — - ——— To 1 Liens 3-9O-7--- — ——— Chlorobonzene 0-4 L -4 ————— — E thy 1 ben r.ene O--" 2-5 —— ———— Styrene 7:-.-r/-.-7 ._.— .... —— Jr;tal Xylenes g j. j.. • L. J.. j ^ . 11 6 6 6 i, 6 6 11 t 6 1 1 A , O • L o 6 6 C: L •h 11 11 A •i A 6 A 6 A , , U '_! !J ^ w >.J U U U •— J U ,_,! t 1 i i _J 'J I : LJ U U ' 1 U U !J U U 1..! ! 1 1 1 1 1 U U 1 1 U CJ — r l i — l L- <f "C1 i.r; -n .-r X ij. u;i .- ... -_ LJ t •; c c~ r.'j LU i - .:! > i U p L''i Ui;i i r ^ 1- 4J - •-•: c •U Q U - CM f- i ^ i. ; *i'! ".: . '_ -' : !. i i . t- -. .-'j cr; ! "! i. .^ i. ~. L1. t- Li _J C' i- ' U 1 - ••1 CJ . J ' i L' TL y ! L L . ' • ijj v J'J <q ) 0 Vr 0- i i ro co i- r». uii O in CO -JJ O KI i> o •<! -o T-t _o o: u o o T • • «i^ CJ •• •• - O t. CJ Tl ID -P L , r-l -. Ill IJJ |J rj ^ -In >. LL . H i!! ,-H si nj u id i; i: .-< UJ u IJ •c ; • . LT' < r -H UJ U. -P UJ lil -j Jj J -P 4- r-< ;j ij i5 iTi -.-l (J P Q . i. -. ; i _ _ Li! cT (V ITI CJli; '-- _J C-I := - i v. !7' -^ '"i ' :i o | j__ c"i U. LJ I.J | CL * Ui .J 1 it LJ • L •-» LJ ill 'D I'D L. 4-' 111 U ':. C-. i'J G U t . 2 •-- 4J -x n -- :* o .- r-l r-i ,~i IJ .; |J 1 ; H ij .... ,(, i i! O ;> •-•• .. u LI •-. iii •• ••-• -p L CJ .; Jj :.j •' ii •• Ijl C LJ H r-l rH -H (£ i- 11 ijj ij .: XJ 4J G > v; rn >ci it! iri ID o -j i: LJ .j .--! u c CO ** j^_ cn "-. i- i? r. ""'' --, x^ ...' .°' D ~ r- I!' 1— -i U. L H- 0 "' LU -J LJ -- 2 D' O J U — CJ2 --jn CLi;ci U •a „ ,. cn <r r i .j ::i ::• r1 D n .j :3 ::• -J :j 13 : . ra _; : \ ... ,("-: ^ -r-i -jj T-I ^j -o -0 -0 -JO -0 'H -D -.'; • ' r-l T 1 T I T-! T-4 T--1 -. i •—» r-l :|j P II JJ lil '-s l" ill i 1 Hi Ij !D Hi Q lil iii J- -.-i i n :: i: i: i: -*- i.. j. n HI HI rr.i Ui i;i iii l i -i i- TJ x: j: a: i: u r i i ij 1.1 r, 4J -P -P -P L J.I ! LI IJ r-i ^|- 01 i:l lil ID f; :J ij : c D -ri ijj x: -v o o a o n .'j ij •. iT. C L It LJ j L L. L L r L •:! : j: iC :j •!• ui 1.3 Q o H n ID u -P < J - P -C r-f X: 01 -H '-1 .-I r-l >. r-l f -.-! |]J !j J di -i- 1 .r -I- 1 r c; .n x: .c o x: u L h- u , H Ui LJ :JJ IU IU iJ U U 1-- U C 1- <i. •• U .; 0 r-i r C -rH -n -H ij •.-! iu ! !! T L o r-i L >. o o p K o L n .p T-4 i j , i ; n i.= :- 13 x: -P x; : i i u ! -i • - j • :>• : r-i L3 L- r-i 4J ii! U. "I Ti CJ r-i I UN -'' X. C I J" L -ri Jl I)J IJ llj *' '• ' JH •' i * 'ij '• i i i..i Cij •. u r^ <x f i -H ,H T-I LJ • •* c- ! '•! cj :• c i ii i i i i i i i i i i it i i i i i i i i i 1 II I 1 1 1 i 1 ! 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 i ! 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i II 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 ! l I I 1 1 1 O ( • i l l - ' K.I O '-r K.' C'J -H O '* KJ If' i KI -0 u. •. <• : ; . i i i i : c> -o i ; ;t' 1 , KI ,., ~. i> -in L-I <r u'; -!j •-.: | i u-j r-.i •"'• 1 id i.ij .-. .;. o.. ^!.i r.| | i f. i | ,,i | o- t i i j i ( i i i i i i i i o i r ••• i > i ai <i <r LJ i!'j u"j !-•- u~t in m «-r r- o CO --i -J •'.:•• '' : - r- r- r- t • --o r-- r- i . u> -c -H r- r- '*> *->• t ) \ . j :j - :3 :j :j "j "3 :j :j - D :. :3 -.j ::i :i ::, i -Q -0 O -0 -'J -L -i'i -€ "I -r-l <1 <: -0 -C <! -0 -0 -H -H * i'J IU c i: IU UJ lij c a x: i u Hi IJ 4' il U. UJ C !- Hi CJ : iii u i: "0 Q- i: u 5 t: L. re x: rj r:j L. : u a. r. 4-> L L: QJ o •> LL I'J 4-> 0! 13 'j C rH J 0 L. 01 .ii IJ --, 4J UJ Jt L. u c i£ L j: c r u ; a. r-l Hi 1": 0 U UJ 4-' ilj lii lil - U .:: JZ L. r-i -H IX. ill L c UJ iU j L i 4J o -n: cti ! o -P c; c i: i 0 -i lil r-i u ! f-,1 lii L. UJ fj M in : .-i c, o x: -.-! K- g i u o i- c '•' -• j X. , !- U L - L rH Q rH flj C i u KI 0 0 h- ijj -.-i 0 > f x: CJ Hi J^ IU ii: x .1 -H - r-i ; j,- i M- r. ui u »• i- o xj r: 1 I'i ' a: D ( -1 :j Ul Ij 4J :::: 15 Ci ii L --H t rn : ' i u L '- M c r; aj 1^1 L r. ;:, o :> !... .rs j CJ l: ••-! XJ .-I L '5 13 I! :C -P -,•! rn r, jv ... jJ _ ' -,- L •* * . ai •- LI i ijj •• o .'. 4-' 4-1 n '! • '• U 1- CJ '-< Cil f- fJj tr M 1- -H 1- CJ U! Ui 1- i l l I I ! 1 i I I I i l l I I 1 ! 1 I I I I I I i 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 i 1 I I I I I I l ! 1 i 1 I I I I I I i 1 I I ! I l l : uj i i -o ii i iii III 1 ! 1 i 1 1 1 N i TH i T-I i c-i TJ .o <..- r.i r- *•? m i ^ u'j o <; i'i c-i •"• IN l l u~:. i i i ...;. i i i co : i i o ici ;:3 rj c- 'H u i \ . s .-i — ' >T o i o *T uj T- |-, ,-i ..^- n a- -i -T t oj -o •-.' i •'..• =)• --J i--, i i i r--i i ii •-• i •::.• i «r ; o a .H r- , co CD c: <;. KI "i CO O I'- CJ t"- 'H O UJ O C> CJ C- O •;> O O K' - t . TH r. T-i r-. r- T-I r- T-I uj T-I i-. -H T-I .-i ^< -,-\ \ / j i u j : r* .' O ^j O .tr V— ^<F •T *S4-' cj o ~> 01 -1 ".'.'. rsl r:-au. 1A VOLATILE ORGAN ICS ANALYSIS DATA SAMPLE NG, BX2&6MSD _<b • Name : CEIKIC CORP Lab Ccide: CEIMIC Case No.: 12058 I Matrix: (sail/water 5 SOIL Contract: <LSD90p28 SAS Me.: ___ No. : BT74: Sam pie wt/vo1: 5 . 0 (g/fnL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW " Moisture: not dec. 3.1 (pack/cap) PACK Lab Sample ID: S90107-08NSD Lab File ID: C0373______ Date Received: Q6/Q8/S9 Date Analyzed: O6/17/99 Dilution Factor: 1. 0______ * A r- k ir-> _|--. ^> l'4<-> . COMPOUND CONCENTRATI DM UNITS: (ug/L cr ug Kg) US/KG - 74-87-3 ———————— Ct. lore-methane 74-33-9 —— ————— Broir.crr.ethsne 75-01-4 — - —————— Vir.vl Chloride 75-00-3 ———— - ——— Ch 1 o roe t han e 75-09-2 ———————— Methylene Chloride 67-64-1 ———————— Acetone 75-15-0 ———————— Carbon Disulf ide 75-35-4 ———————— 1 . 1-Dichloroethene 75-34-3 ———————— 1.1-Dichloroethane 540-59-0 ——————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3-- ——————— Chloroform 107-O6-2 ——————— 1,2-Dichlorce thane 78-93-3- —————— - — 2— E* ut an one 71-55-6 —— ————— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichlcroethane 56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride 103-05-4 ———— - — -Vinyl Acetate 75 27 4 Bromcdichlorornethane 7S 87-5 1,2-DichloroDrcoane 10O61-O1-5 ————— cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene 79-01-6 ———————— Trichloroethene 124-4S-1 ——————— Dibromochlorome thane 79-00-5 ———————— 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 71-43-2- ——————— Benzene 10061-O2-6 ————— Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene ___ -' ^:~' ^- BrornoTorm 108-iO-l ——————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 591-7S-6 ——————— 2-Hexanone 127-18-4 ——————— Tetrachloroethene / *r o-t j i , j. , -^ , _i Tetrachloroeth-*ne ___ 108-88-3: ——————— Toluene 108-90-7 ——————— Chlorobenzene 100-41-4 ——————— Ethyl benzene 100-^2-5 ——————— Styrene 1330-20--7 —————— Total Xylenes 11 11 11 11 10 r-\ 6 6 6 6 6 6 11 6 11 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 11 11 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 I i I i i > LJ :u :u :B ! J :u :u :u :u iU :u : u :u :u ID i i i i *-J :LI :u !U :u :u !U :u ;u :u !U :u :u su i !U t 1 I t *_J i t i 141 FORM I VOA o( TUT OOi 036O $ Matrix: .';o.il.\jtter) ECIL Eanipls wv/volt 5.0 (g/mL) G. I Level: (low/meo) LOW :: Mci a lure: r.ct do:c. Cclur.'.r, : (pack/cap) PACK COMPOUND r.' Y - •:. -7 )_• A j_ <_• / EA Lsb Sr.T.ple ID: S90107-07 Date? Received: 06 /OS/89 Date Analyzed; 06/1 £./_59 Dilution Factor 1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: Q ----- <-., h 1 o r o IT. e t h a r, e yl Chloride. -00-3------—————Chlcrca thane -OT-2——•—————Methylene Ch - 6 4--1 -----————Acetone ids 15-0-————••——Carbon Disulfide_________ -35-4————————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ -3-T-3--—••—-———1,1-Dichloroethane_______ :>-•:'?--•:•--••—-———1,2-Dichloroethcns (tstz.1). - ('.6-3----——————Chloroform_______________ ? ~ 06 ~-2 •-•--••--——1,2-Dichloroeth-.ne ____ 71 - . "r-.f;--—--•——-—1 ,1 ,1-Trie hi croc t.h£.p.e_ .'.' 'I Z-'.-C'--4 ———-—Vinyl Acetate________] 7?-27-" -------——BrciT.cdichloromethane. . 3—y .-*— 5 — — — — — — — — — 1 , 2—Die h 1 e-rcpropane_ 1C 061-01-5—————cis-l,3-Dichlorcprcp=r.e_ 79-01--6--——•-———Trichlcrsethcne________ 12'1 --12- *. -——————Dibr cmoc h 1 orome thane___ 79-00-1 •-— • ———- i ,1,2-Trichloroethane__ — j _ /* -^ -. .-• x *- _ " — - — — — — — rar.s-i , 3-Dichlcroprcpene_ crm __ ___ 1 OS-10-1———————4-Methyl-2- 591-73-6————-——2-Hexanone_ 127-16-4———• -Tetrachloroethene 79-34- ?-———————1,1,2,2-Tei.rachloroethane. i.OS-88-3—-————Toluene .1 CE-r>0--7——————Chl ore-ten zene. -00-41-4- —— -——Ethyl benzene_ ^7-5—-——•—Styrene_____ - -T "T ,-< *~,,- -r _ -r ,^ 4_ _ T v . , •} _ __ _ _ .i...-.-_ _ ,_ .' .- • - — — - --— j cjuc.i /-. /1 critic- FORM I 'v'DA ZlO o( •- i- S 0 6 6 6 6 6 / ii 11 160 6 6 140 U U X TUT 001 0361 fe J» \T-tl /* T T i I— ,— p. r* /\ *. I T r-> r-> ,-\i-.t.\i \/ - i--L-.li I il—U. LJ!~ -Ol-il'i 1 '._,J M'.Mi-lL- i • T-* A T r'i C"* ! 't~ t-'t-i I H til'l tit r- r-. /\ r- At^f-il r- i 1 f ^- r t-i o t-i i i r l_ t- i - »_ cl w ^ _ i_j t. Case W e . : 1205S ratr:-;r '..^-i 1/water) SDIL 5arr.pl c t-jt/voli 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Leve i : (1 cw/n-.ed ) L.CU' V. Moisture: ncr dec. 11 Col umh : ( ps.c k / c a p ) PACK CAS r<;o. COMPOUND Contract: 63D9002S SAS Mo.: DX26? Lab SaiTipic Lab File ID: C0374 D^.te Received: 0&/08/S9 Date AnslyzEd: '06/17/39 Dilution Factor: i . 0_____ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) U8/K3 Q I 3--- ——— • —— Ch]oromethane ne 75-01-4 ———————— Vinyl Chloride. 75 -OO-3 ———————— Ch lores than s -Methylene Chloride. -Acetone ________ £7-64-1————— _________ 75-1 ~.-0-———————Carbon Disul fide -1,1-Dichloroethene. •1.i-Dichloroethane 540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total )__ 67- = £ -3-- ——————Chloroform__________________ ' -J" T— n S—'-" — — — — — — — — 1 ^ — r> • r- H 1 r-i--r-i= +• t- - " ci a. ••_'; *_• o *, j_ .1 *. ]_•±. c 111 c/ r c fe u n --% i«tr ___ 7B-93-3———————2-E-:utanone___________ 71-55-6——————— 1 , i , i—Trichlorcethane-.. 51-~3--tr.-——————Carbon Tt:tr = zhloride_ l'I3-05- --—-———Vinyl Acetate________ 75-27-4—-——————Bromodichl Dromethane_ 7E-B7-5————————1 ,2-Dichlaropropane-_ 10061-O1-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene. 79-01-6————————-Trichicrcethene________ 124-45-1 ——— ———Dibromochlarome thane -1,1,2-Trichloroethane_ -Benzene 1O061-O2-6—————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75-25-2———————-Brofiicf orm ________________ 103-10-1———— 591 — — P- (...————— 127-18-4———— 79-34-5- ——— 108-SE-3——— — --Toluene -4-Methy1-2—Pentancne_ -2-Hexanone _______ Tetrachloroethene________ 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 103-90-7———————Chlorobenzene. 100-41-4 —————— -Ethyi benzene_ 100-AT-5 — -—-——Styrene______ 1330-20-7—-———Total Xylenes f 11 1 1 li 6 C3 6 6 A 6 11 11 6 6 6 *^i 6 6 6 TUT 001 0:62 I o Name: CEIMIC CORF' 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS C'ATA SHEET Contract: 63D90028 ERA SAMPLE NO. BX976 Lab Code: CEIHIC Case No.: 12058 ' SAS Mo.: SD6 No.: BT747 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol : 5.0 (g/mL) G_ I Level: (low/med) LOW 7. Moisture: not dec. 13 1 Column: (pack/cap) PACK Lab Sample ID: 890107-15 Lab File ID: B1651 Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Analyzed: 06/19/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CA3 NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 74-97-3————————Chloromethane____________ 74-33-9————————Brcmcmethane____________ 75-01-4————————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3——————--Chloroethane____________ 75-O9-2————————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1————————Acetone_________________ 75-15-O————————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4————————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3————————Chloroform______________ 107-06-2———————1,2-Dichloroethane_______ 78-93-3————————2-Butanone______________ 71-55-6————————1.1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5————————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 1O8-05-4———————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-27-4—————————Bromodichloromethane______ 78-37-5————————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene_^_ 79-01-6————————Trichloroethene__________ 124-48-1———————Dibromochlorome thane_____ 79-00-5————————1,1,2-Trichloroe thane____ 71-43-2—-——————Benzene__________________ 10061-O2-6—————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2————————Bromoform________________ 108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Pentsnone_____ 591-73-6———————2-Hexanone______________ 127J-13-4———————Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-5————————1,1,2,2-Te trachloroethane_ 103-83-3———————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7———————Chlorobenzene____________ 10C-41-4———————Ethyl benzene____________ 1CO-42-5———————Styrene__________________ 1330-20-7——————Total Xylenes____________ FORM I VGA 11 11 11 11 6 67 7 6 6 6 6 6 33 6 6 11 6 6 6 6 6 6 13 6 6 20 11 6 6 6 6 110 , 6 6 :u :u :u ;u ;u :u :u :u :u :u t i :u :u ;u :u !U :u :u :u :u ;u ;u :u :u :u ii :u !U TUT OOi 0363 L/87 Rev. g LJ _ j LL3:c r- ci-i r- 0** •'I 'LL CQ LJ __ -- _. CO IN O 0 1 LV, LJ CO _,_ L' ' *• -p <I U I-- 15 i ~ ^_ •LJ 4J C ti'J 0 >H t j tfl ':>- J ::£ A- ,- r ^•' t •.-i UJ tJ rH i'^ :i IT' IT :""! LL! - -: ;X r-i iX !- - i : <I i j f t j rH i.l LL- t 1 ' ;'. J .. 0! 'ii r .-t 1 C- -4j r-i" v-« Ch r -- i co H t CO O t-j 0 'T'l U J *H O IN x L> «H -O C OJ tl C -7 COn t:i n en n •• oi P > QJ rH -H rH QJ U. 01 U ii rH QJ '•J - < LL: CO LL 01 n n -P i n; rfl 03 -J -J Q bj. r. - ~ CO e£ CO • CD CC u j ^— « '-"' _j c •'. a ~~*. x !J: = • •_• •r: Z IT. J » 01 i"n o 3 W O K' CJ OS CO _J U ~-. L ^ Ui 13 •i- 0! C i .f C !-•( :"• \ > :: -", - 2 r-H -i .-H 0 LU .H ID rH C.' 0 > IJI >• -.-.. .p UI i "n " a .. U ri rH rt L C. QJ \ -n -P e > ; >y Ki is ui -) T. in .1 l> • 0 CO CO C:i *• "%. Cl C- -H C 1 O X X • •5 ~s " / •-> •• \ L. L'J •O •• 0 -« i: ID n -P en x- 4J 01 U H- CO u N ui I-H ~! 03 > LL ;•: i. rH 13 " 4J iB C O' :•: c 0 z v UJ <E ••-! tJ x Jj - __ j j-T, Qi at 3 l- :3 •P -P r-i <X '0 nj -H Ct i- Q P Q \~ U ...r U -J CJ v- O 3 CJ O U c5 rjj i •• u X QJ a ~D Cj •~- i''! ij ::.! c c^ D CL u; J" Ci- X 1 i -->. t-' 1- i C0 Z u *- u LL Z "1; Q. X •>-> ci > CO -P s— ' n o • <a UJ C 3 Cii L IJ C CC 3 -i !5 Lj •t-1 •!-> Ill UI U rH a L i; -P f.J '< LL i I'l CO :~j r? .j D D ro _j D ~i ij o o o o o o o o o o •r-i i < -H rH »H rH rH rH rH -I '-r '•'•? "1" "•!" «f ^1" T rJ" C4" *•!" i L IU j^ -I- ' L. LL! UJ -. j ^ rH -• J >• L!j 01 QJ Oi LI C C C 0 rH CJ Ol 01 L. :x n N N a. -t: c c c o t-1 .-i 11! Ol r-< 0) — l Ui rH Si a a £t n n o -i o o c o o x r o c o c i- QJ L L O L Oi L QJ Q T: o o u Q x; o i: r-< iX^H ^ rH rH O. rH C. j- i"j x: x: <r J7 rn jz rH L. '... U IJ U >• CJ > rH ! f) -.-I -rl rH -,-| JT | JT 0 IN ri Q Q >Q 4-' fj -i-' C ••' JC N Of — • !il IU Ml tJ t'') ^T C C J H Ui i; Li ••>. i •• ' 01 '• -H 1 U. XJ /i r< r) pj r-i C'J XJ «JT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i l i O 1 i l l 1 1 ! cj M- i »H r- >o i J m i ! CO 1 '-i N <•'.• 1 L' -t i j 4] 'H ii <r LT -i- - r- •; LJ o co 10 -r 1 ! lij u" '-t f I CO H 1 »H -Jj O 1-0 ^0 O *•' u"i -y o O in IT; C^ O TH rH l> LO rH rH |> O f" "' ^ .^ -., _, --, -., --, -^ ^ O O1 '1. • O O O O . O* O1 *H rH r TH rH «H £i rH r-i «t *t ^ -•? f>:' -t O 5f ^t C^J Ol QJ L; c -r-i |Q r XI ai -P rH IJJ fl --:^ LJ r-i 'X r-i i. 0 x O U. Ol C O C i i7 Ol XT QJ C "J •£ ij -l- \ s: rH a: m a. •H 4J ID o rH 13 o o Q 0! C C > -H L L 1 Q Ol Hi fei £ ij 0 0 n '.- i i : j: -P <r *-H rn ui u r: 3 a Oi r j; O rH |Jj - 0 S ij LJ U L C J'j j t- H -r>, i -r-l •P u o : -P D u r J a •.-; iii L 1 -H I N --- 1 Z X 4- "! "' -T - UI C 1 111 -.-, 1 i ' iU -H '• z "r. :••: • -: i. -, c-j cu .u c-j i i i i i i i i l l i i i i i i i i i i 11 I ! I I I I ! I I I I I i i i I I I ! i I ! i I I I I I I I II i I I I I ! i i r- i i i i r . - H ci i --i !••:• - * „ i i c i i •=r i i i i r- --i K' -u r ••; uj o- i. j o in y- co i -- a >-••• - i oi i i rH ! i | IP 'H O IN t- CO CO iu " UJ --I C-J <i -0 Cr- T- OJ -H <j -H r-; "3 T "' o •:::• o rH rH H ef ,^j i.f QJc 01 r-jc QJn 0 QJ L C C -H rH rH x: 0; -H u c c •H il) r(j L rH !J H- i:j L j. a •U- |.J rH •• x: x; CJ liCJ '• ''ii ! rH Z «t 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! i ! 71 '. w c'j i' r'- CO O <t 1 f-! O •JD C-J r-l O rH C^ rH n n o o rH rH cj- tj- . rH 0 C 01 oi r c a P rH •H >- 13 x: ITJ 4J -P Ol 3 r. XI 1 O KI !.. 1 0 0 rH L x: o U rH •Ii XI X CJ ijj ! I <r i l l l 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! 1 ; ; r -i iv i ! LO 0 •~a in i r > o- co m --, -3 -) — — o o o rH rH rH <f *f «f Olc Ol •H D rH 'Ci O Ol -P C C C 01 oi oi r rn a a 03 O O X: rH j. -P U 0 X: >- rH a u 4. '13 0 U II L -rt rH O L ',*-. rH ) — • j; x: •P U -0 Ol '0 '- ^" X rj- r oi '• C i I C J i i i iiiiii 1 ! 1 •ij *t C'-J 1 1 r- r- -i^ in <r ftl 'H N CO O N CO _, _j -^ --, _ — - — — O O O O O O O rH O rH rH r-i O *r O *r *t <i C'< C J rH O C Q) QJ C Ol Oi x: QJ -P c a rH IB QJ O 'C rH 3 L x: oi .u oi r-, o -P c x: c o rH JZ -H 4-1 0) 4-; X: a rH j- rH Q U it; -H IL >- L •H r c X -i-: L O Hj rH 4-' H h- L o •> . r c I o L x: CL H LO r-, 4J 4-i rji O ' j; -H 4 c i «f U Z f= 01 -0 i -r! U - C'-J M ( J a <I IN iiiiiii i i ('•' UJ C-i M- h- t \ lf u"^ ai cV -i o"- c'j L> u ".; |x | ; rH tO <l LrJ rH CO KI O O D- C- CO -H Cj -0 \/ < ' K1 O ,_4 O '•-/ 1— '— -j u- ' tv^ (m --jJ rH 1 ^\^> ~-> 0 fj\ rH .^ \ E l 1^ LC'0 LL ! I i 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: CEIMIC CORF_____________ Contract: 63D90028 EPA SAMPLE--NO. -"- EX 978 Lab Code: CEIMMC Case Mo.: 12053 SAS No.: SDG No.: BX979 I Matrix: (sail/water) SOIL Sampls wt/va-Is 5.0 (g/mL) G_ I Level: C low/med) LDU1 7. Moistarer urait dec. 22 Lab Sample ID: 890107-1: Lab File ID: C0401 Column: (ps.ck/cap) PACK Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Analyzed: 06/19/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CAS ,NC. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UB/KG 74-ST—3——————Ch 1 or ome thane_____________ 74-S3-9————————Bromome thane_____________ 75-01-4————————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-0<Q>-3————————Chloroethane_____________ 75-09^-2————————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-6*-1————————Acetone_________________ 75-15—0————————Carbon Disulfide__________ 75-35—4————————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34V-3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-39-0———————1,2-Dicnloroethene (total ). 67-6>&-3————————Chloroform_______________ 107-C6-2———————1,2-Dichloroe thane_______ 78-93-3————————2-Butanone_______________ 71-55-6————————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-?————————Carbon Tetracnlcride______ 108-€5-4———————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-2T--*-————————Bromodichlorome thane_____ 78-87-5————————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichlorcprcpene___ 79-O1—6————————Trichloroethene__________ 124-4S-.1———————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-OO-5————————1,1,2-Trichloroe thane____ 71-4-3-2————————Benzene_________________ 10061—O2—6—————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25'—Z————————Bromof orm_______________ 108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Fentanone_____ 591-78-6———————2-Hexanone______________ 127-1S-4———————Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-5————————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 10S-SS-3———————Toluene_________________ lOS-^O-7———————Chlorobenzene____________ 100-41—4———————Ethyl benzene____________ 100-42—5————•——Styrene ______________ 133O-20-7——————Total Xylenes___________ 13 13 13 13 22 43 6 6 6 6 6 6 13 6 6 •t ~r j.--' 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 13 13 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Q :u :u :u !U :u :u :u ;u :u :u :u :u :u t i l i U !LJ iU !U :LJ !'J ;u !LJ :u :u :u :u :u :u :u !U :u FORM I VGA TI IT fUI OO1 0365 Rev. MPLE '; !',/-.-,-,3: CCr-:TC CCTP T-. •./ m—r r—. I. • .-. / / C CzntrGct: 6SD9002? I CaLs? !,o.; .'.2053 —- v /-* —r r-, 1: A V / O_ f 5^f7,p j. ti v'Jt / -.'ol ; ! ,-el: ( lcw/.T,e:-d) LOW •IsiEture: r.r-t dec. 21 Cj tr C • I E.-.tracticn: (SepF/Ccn t/Scnc) SDNC 3PC Cleanup: ( Y / N ) y__ pH: 3.6 I LL-.b Si-..T,pIe ID: Lsb File ID: D a t e R e c e i v e- d : D a t c? u. Xv u r o. c "t. — »j Date Analyzed: 06/10/39 06/12/09 06/30/S7 f~* r" 1 K.-' r% i—. i i r" 1 K.-' r-i.—, i i Y. l T~. ^- ! ::~ •,....-:'. !_' CONCENTRATICN UNITS: fug/L ~-r ug/lvq) L'G/K - - --- ——— Acer.a^hthene 51- 2C-- f - —-----—- , 4-Difi i trcpheroi _________ 100-O2-7-—-———^-Nitrophencl_____________ 132-64-9———————Dioenrofuran______________ 121-14-2-——————2,4-Dinitrotcluens_______ 34-66-2————————Diethylphthaiate__________ 7005-72-3——————4-Chlarophenyl-phenylether. 36-73-7-—-—————F luorene ________________ 100-10-6- —————— 4-Mitroaniline__________ 534- =2-1--- —— — 4 , 6-Dini t.-o-2-Methy 1 phenc 1. 36-30-6---—-———M-Mitrosadiphenylamine ( 1 ). 101 --55-3—————--4-SrGriOpheny l-phenylet.her_ 113-74--1-—•— ----He xschl;; i-c: benzene________ G7-56-5-——-——-P.-r-itc-.-rhlc-rcphencl________ 35—0 !••-5 —— — — •- — — — P 'isn^.n threne______________ 120-1 2-~--—-——-Anthracene 34-74-2—-————-----^i-n-Futylphthalc-.te______ 206-44-0——- ———F1 Licran thene______________ 129-00-0———————Pyi-.rne____________________ 55-6 3 -- 7 - -—- - --—- B :...(t y I b e n z y i p h thai a t e ______ 71-?'"-l ----- ----- •----"; . 7 ' -Dichiarcbsnzidins_____ 56-55-3-——-—------!-•=• i-.zcC a) Anthracene________ 213-01-9———- — -Chryssne___________________ 117-31-7-—————--!:,i5'2-Eth>-lhexyl )Phthalf*te. 117-34-0———————Di-r.-Octyl Phthalste______ 205-99-2—-—-——Penro(L)Fluoranthene______ 207-03-7-———--—!?«n-of k ) Flucran thene______ 50--32-r----——- — £c?nzo ( a '; Py rsne____________ 173-35-5---——— Indf:-n---i 1. 2 , 3-cd } Pyrene. 57-70-3—-——---r; Len- '•. a , h } Ar t:-racsne_ 191-24-2-—-——9(51-17.0 ( g ., h , i )Pery lene (1; ~ Canr.r-L L--I- Espai-ated from Diph^ny FORM I EV-2 4100 340 4100 4100 340 4100 4100 34O B40 340 54O 340 340 340 34 O 84 0 1700 S40 U LJ i I LJi i LJ I l O LJ ;u u :LJ B40 !LJ- S40 ; LJ SI40 ; U £4O • 1 LJ 340 ! L.' 340 i (• 340 ! LJ. TUT 001 0366 1/S7 IB ~ fc-* T i i f< f .-"»"i- T i r— .-^ r-, ^- A t. i T r^- r-- ."•. '- i /\ i v /.— •*- r~- •--. .*\ -«• r. : --\ ,\— <— •*- : . * / (..:i_i-i : i L__ (_r\i_ji-!iM i ocr CIJN*-U_ ; ::: -. o _. i-, ; t-i :::. .L_I_ t UFA SAMPLE NO. Centra-1: .iBD9002E '•latr.l. ;•; : (<..Hwi I./.-jater } SOIL !-icf.r-iple ,vt/v.-l: 31 .4 (q/fnL) G_ .Level: (law/n-,ed) LQK! ':: Moisture-: r-cfc dec. j 8 dec. _ I Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Scnc) fj GFC Cleanup: (Y/N) N,_ pH: _ C * > f~- *• ' — r p V C? "7 C> Lab Sample ID: 890107-13 b File ID: A 1254 .8 Date Received: 06/10/S9 Date Extracted: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: O6/2V/S9 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CCMPC'JND CCNCENTRATIGN UNITE; (ug/L or ug/Kc) L'S/K5 i08--v:>-2 ——————— Phenol 111-^-4 ——————— ti=<2-Chloroet!-.yl ) Ether 95-:: 7- 5- ———————— 2-Chlorcphencl 541 -73- 1 ——————— 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 106-4/6-7 ——————— 1 ,4-Dichlcrobenzene 4. >.•<.' j'-t o Fens/* Alcohol 95--5O-1 ———————— 1.2-Dichlcrobenzene 95-4^-T-- ——————— 2 -Ms thy 1 phenol 3963S-32-9 ————— bis (2-Chloroisopropy 1 ) Ether _ 106-44-5 ——————— 4-MethvlDhenol 621-64—7 ——————— N— Ni troso-Di-n— Propy 1 amine 67 /2 1 — Hex ac hi oroe thane 98-95—--. ———————— Nitrobenzene 73-59-i ———————— Isaphcrone b8-75--5- ——————— 2-Nitrophenol 1'.'5 6, *=? -2, 4-Dimethyl phenol 6b E5 •'.) Benzole Acid il 1-91-1 ——————— bis (2-Chlcraethcxy) Me thane __ 120 -83- 2-- —————— 2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-SZ-l ——————— 1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene 91--j':.s-3 ———————— Naphthalene 106---+7-8 ——————— 4-Chlorcaniline :•: , -•' '^--- ---——-- Hexachl orobutadiene 59-50-7- ——————— 4-Chloro-3-Methvl phenol 91-5 / -6 ———————— 2-Methvl naphthalene 77-47—4 ———————— Hexachlorocyc Icpen tadiene ___ E8-06— 2- ——————— 2 , 4 , 6— Trichl oropheno 1 95-95-4 —— ————— 2,4.5-TrichlGrcDhcnol 91-TS-7 ———————— 2-Chlcronaphthalene tS-74-4 ———————— 2-Nitroaniline 131- 1" -3 ——————— Dimethyl Phthalate '.-CP-'-'f.-'E ——————— Acenaphthylene f.. -06-2 " .--2 ——————— 2, 6-Dinitro toluene 400 400 4OO 400 400 400 400 4OO 40O 400 400 4OO •- 0 0 2000 400 40O 4OO A ,-, .-, *T '..) I.) 400 400 40O 400 2000 4 <.' O 2000 400 400 4OO 1 i : t i i i ; U :u :u !U :u :u ; U 1 U U u i 1u u . u i L.' : U !U 1 1 1 i 1 J ;LJ ;LJ IU 1 ' I i i * ;u ; FORM I SV-1 2-11 357 1/37 rvf--, TUT OO1 0367 VOLATILE ORGAN I C3 ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: CEIMICCGRP EPA SAMPLE NO. BX983 Lab C.ods: CEIKIC Case No.: 12053 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol : 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW 7. Moisture: not dec. 17 Column: (pack/cap) PACK Contract: 63090028 __________ SAS No.: ______ SDG Mo.: BX97S Lab Sample ID: 890107-18 Lab File ID: C0407 Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Analyzed: 06/20/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-B7-3————————Chlorome thane____________ 74-83-9————————Bromcmethane_____________ 75-O1-4————————Vinyl Chloride____________ 75-00-3————————Chloroe thane_____________ 75-09-2————————Methylene Chloride________ 67-64-1————————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0————————Carbon Distilfids_________ 75-35-4————————1, l-Dichloroethene_________ 75-34-3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-16-3————————Chloroform_______________ 107-O6-2———————1,2-Dichloroethane_______ 78-93-3————————2-Buitanone______________ 71-55-6————————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5————————Carbon Tetrachlorlde______ 103-05-4———————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-27-4————————Bromodichlorometnane_____ 78-37-5 ———————— 1, 2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-O1-6————————Trichlcroetnene__________ 124-48-1———————Dibromochlcromethane______ 79-00-5————————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2————————Benzene__________________ 10061-02-6—————Trans-l,3-Dichlorcpropene_ 75-25-2————————Brcmoform________________ 108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-73-6———————2-Hexancne_______________ 127-13-4———————Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-5————————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 103-88-3———————Toluene__________________ 10S-9O-7-——————Chlorofcenzene____________ 100-41-4———————Ethyl ben sens_____________ 100-42-5———————Sty rare__________________ 1330-20-7——————Total Xylenes___________ 12 12 12 12 3 12 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 6 6 i •- 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 :u !U :u '/ :u :u :u :u :u :u ;u ;u :u iu :u !U :u ;u !U :u !U :u :u :u :u :u :u :u :u :u !U !U iu -183 FORM I VCA TUT 001 O368 _H I VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET f Lab Name: CEIMIC CGRP_____ ERA SAMPLE U3. No. : 1205E Contract: 6ED7002E i__________ SAS No. : ______ SDG Mo. : BX97S I • i 4 ^ .k . - * . .. r / f ^ ~ i_l ' " ' A "*" T '] ^^^1 Lab Sample? ID: S9 0107 -1.9 Sample wt/voi I 5.0 (g/mL) E_ Lab File ID: 0414 Level: (low/med) LOW Moisture: not dec. 17 olumn: (pack/cap) PACK Date Received: 06/10/67 Date Analyzed: 06/20/89 Dilution Factor: 5.0 _ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-37-3————————Chloromethane____________ 74-83-9————————Bromome thane_____________ 75-01-4————————Vinyl Chloride____________ 75-00-3————————Chloroe thane_____________ 75-09-2————————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1—-—————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0————————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4————————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total ). 67-66-3-———————Chloroform_____________ 107-06-2———————1,2-Dichloroethane_______ 78-93-3————————2-Butanone_______________ 71-55-6————————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5————————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 108-05-4———————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4————————Bromodichlorome thane_____ 7E-87-5———————— 1.2-Dichloropropane______ 1OC61—Oi — 5—•———cis—1,3—Dicnloropropene 79-01-6————————Trichloroethene__________ 124-48-1———————Dibromochlorome thane_____ 79-00-5————————1,1.2-Trichloroethsne____ 71-43-2————————Benzene_________________ 10061-02-6—————Trar,s-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-23-2-———————BrciTiOf orm________________ 1 OS-10-i———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-7E-6———————2-Hexanone_______________ 127-13-4———————Tetrachlcroethene________ 79-34-5————————i,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 10S-ES-3———————Toluene_________________ 103-90-7———————Chloro benzene___________ 10C-41-4———————Ethyl benzene____________ 100-42-5———————Styrene__________________ 1330-20-7——————Total Xylenes___________ 60 60 60 60 200 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 30 30 60 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 60 30 30 30 30 30 30 49O Q :u !L) :u :u :u :u :u :u !'J :u :u :u !U :u !U ;u :u !U :u :u ;u !U ;u :u !U ;u :u :u I O 'X FORM I V'OA ~190 ./87 Rev, TUT OO1 O369 '-• _. ._ J- . _ ... .:. . , — »•», r— ,-,.-,'•- f^j C "• ~ '- • ,. - .-!._• !-<:._' . t _ _ __________ i fc . llati i:.: {y.cil/w^. Sr.r.plz :•;t.•--•.-1 : 70. 2 ; g/,7,L • Level : .: 1 •::;;/ -.td ) LOW Cu.?" ; n;:-t d s c . ; -. ... r— J T .. i —\ / .1 .—,r~, c: .-.-, J f J. J. L; .. ^, I r-;.i. ^id-'_______ '...I r~ C . C;. trsctior- .* < SepF/Tcnt/Eonc ) EPC Cleanup: (Y/rO N__ pH: g.5 *?' c\ t G R ft? C t: j. V C d : i.' •':• / 1 '..'• /'::! T p. _ j.. _ p ... i. .. ^ _. 4. ^ _i , •"V • •'' 1 '-* ••''" '~ *•- ,--n, i —* f— i • — r-. .N -f •' .'•- K i i r K -•--•/— '.._ ;._l, ''i „ i_. i '. . :". i*? .1. <._ I •• i..1 i : J. 1 C. / i . . . - > . - . — , . -,::/ i_ ::.- .1;:, »-,.„ ; ...-...- y.ll--r 4-<•—•—————•!.is(2--Chl = rr.-sthyl ;E7her______ ?5-f 7-8----••• - ——--2--C:-. : cre-phenol______________. C41-7*7 -1 —-———-1, 3-Dichlorobenzene_________ 106--6-7- - -----———1,4-D:; chlcrobenzsne_________ 100-21-6——-——Benzyl Alcohol._____________ 97-50-1-—————1.2-Cichlorobenzc-ne________ ?5-43-"'-—-—————2-Methylphencl_____________ 3963--!--32--9—-—— bis ( 2-CMcroisopropy 1 )Ether__ 106-44-?,-————4-Methylphenol_____________ 621- 64-7-————-! <- Nitraec-Di-n-Frcpyl z.T.ine__ 67-72-1—-----——-Hexachloroethane___ ________ ^?-=~--7-..——.-——.——MJ.I-C-SF:-,:-£ r^__________________ 7 ?-?'"--.". - - - - - - - - - I ^ z p!". c r G r. ^.___________________ i' [-"••• f - - ------—- •:-• - M ;.. t r r r- h c. r c 1 _______________ ' C [-/:.-- 7 - -———-—2,. 4 - D i.r.e t h y 1 - !~,,~;-::;; ___________ 65- Pv.--0———-——Ps-:::c:i- Arid.________________ 11 _.-"•-1 — - -- - -bis (2-1 h 1 c; csthc xy ) Me thane__ 120-97 -2 — — ———2.4-Pirh1 crophen = I__________ •• ^ *• •— *- _ j _ r -- -•-- -""" ' " " - !• ' .'.'- -..'"-"• • ' -:i " - — • - — • -- —... —._ _______ ___ £ 7--vZ ""- ----- -—-HexachloroDL't;.'.u;;.^r.e_____ 59-50-7————'•———4-Chlora-3-M=thv 1 phenol _ 91-: 7--———————2-Methylnaphthalene____ 77-47 -^—---———-—HexachlcrccyclopEntaoicn G8-06-2-——•————2,4,6-Trichlcropher.ol __ 95-?':-^———————-2.4,5-Trichlorophenol_ 91-55-7---———-2-Chlcrr-,/:-.r. j-.j--r----,..------- —— 2-\.i tr.'j/j:-,11.1.- i ". clucr I/ :::0 1600 1600 1600 ii.-:.-o 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 j 600 1600 1600 16 00 1600 1600 76.00 1600 1600 1600 •1400 1600 1600 1600 6100 1600 1600 7/..00 1600 7600 16 ro 1600 1600 :u ;'j ;u iu lu :u :u : u IU : :. j 1 U iu ;LJ i • i t V - .' ' 1 U i u -364 TUT 001 0370 1C _______________ Ccntrart: 6RD90020 C:PA SAMPLE NO. Nc,. BX97G Lab £~f,u:le ID: G90107-19 Lab File ID: A12S5_____ :trr,c- :'C Cleanup: dec. .___ ; SepF/Can t/Ssnc) SONG (Y/N) N__ pH: 3.5 Date Received: C^/lO/39 Date Extracted: 06/12/S9 Date A r; s 1 y z e G : 07/01/S9 Dilution Factor: A. 0_____ f— /-• K ' — r— v ; -r C' • v_-_Ji i — c. i . i •.. r (U.-.J/L Cr - - 3 - N i t. r c- aniline, - -1 :-. t- G r,.-• c; n t. h e n e ___ •_.. • _. ••. -14- --2,4- D i n i t r o p n e n c 1. --4-N.i trophenc 1 _____ - D i ben r c f u ran __ . -2,4-Dinitrctrluene, -Dicthyi phrhalate 70v3-7_J-3-————4-Chloropheny 1-pheny lei B6-77.-7—•—- ——— F] uorene______________: 100-'.0-6-———-----4-Nitroani 1 ine _ ; CJ6-30-6-- --4 , 6-Dinitro-2-*1ethy 1 phenol -N-!Mi trosodipheny 1 5. mine ( i ) -~ •-Brcffiopl-.c.riy 1 -pheny J E th;_ r_ -—Hex ec hi Ic re benzene_________ - • - F' e- n t a c r, 1 o r o p h e n t; 1 _________ - - F1 h e n a n t h r e r. e _____________ --••Anthracene ___._. —D i -n -En t y 1 p h t ha 1«t_». —F1uoranthene_______ —Pyrene _ _____ _ "-^"-7--———-—Butylbenzylphths lists. —3 , 3 ' -Di^hlcrc,fcenridir:e:-. —•—Bn-nzo ( a } Anthracene____ —C h "• y s e n e ______________ — bi s(2-E thy1hsxy1)Phtha1 ate. —Di-n -Oc ty 1 Phtha 1 ate_____'_ —Eer.zo ( b ) Fluoranthens______ — If: e r,:: o n:) F1 u c r f. n t h, e n e _______ —-Bsnzo'a)Pyrene____________ —•-Indcno (1,2, 3-cd ) Pyrene. —-Di ten z ( a , '.} An thracene__ — l-'enzc. ' g . h . i )Pery lane 7 6 00 _. T' >.' 7 6 0 0 760-' I' 1600 160O 1600 160O - r. *-\ ,->. 7600 7600 160O 1 600 1600 7 r-.-:"; 1600 1 600 1600 74 O 200O 16 CO — • .•- .-, 1600 1600 54OO 16OO S70 160O 770 1600 1 6 0 0 •-'30 vJ •T ,_' U u u u LI U -»U LI LJ U !_! • i u t ( l.J u »J -» >_' ' 1 I I LI LI U -Io u J '_! j_ -T 365 epara.ted from Diphenylam^ FORM I EV-2 TUT 001 O37.1. 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab l-^.m :RP EPA-SAMPLE SX984MS L^W C3d=: en I!*! 1C Case No.: 12053 Contract: 65090029 __________ SAS No. : _______ SDG No. : BX973 J Sample wt/vol: 5.O (g/mL) S_ Level: (low/med) LOW 7. Moisture: not dec. 17 Colurr.n : ( pack/cs.p ) PACK Lab Sample ID: E90107-19MS Lab File ID: C0415 '_____ Date Received: 06/10/39 Date Analyzed: 06/20/89 Dilution Factor: 5.0______ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 7-2— 97— ~— • —— T A ^* "^" (— s -~ rr ,-, « A 75-00-3- —— - 75-09-2 —— - 67—64—1———- 7 1* 1 = f"> -7 c: -T c /\ 75-34-3 —— - *^ A A ^ O /~i D*fU _> v '.' 67-66-3 —— - -7O t?T T- "71 »r. c l C /_ *-. -7- c; 103-05-4 — --£- ^—— T A 7S-S7-5 —— 10061-01-5 T O l"l * ' XT • J -t C * ~^ n '"l *~> ^ —t * n-r <-> / J. t _' ^L. 10061-02--6 •7 e ^n rr ^^ &0 1 -TCI / 127-13-4 — •TO — n ^ * ,-• [-• n i n Jw >_' 4_- ' T A "S •* t~* I': f '"^ C ————— Chlcro.T.e thane BrcfTiome thane - ———— Viftvl Chloride ————— Chlo roe thane ————— Meths-lene Chloride ————— Acetone ————— Carbon Disulfide ————— 1 . 1-Dichlornethene ————— 1 . 1-Dichloroethane ————— 1 ,2-Dichlcroethene ( total ) __ ————— Chloroform ————— 1 .2-Dichloroethane ————— 2— Butanone ————— 1 . 1 « 1-Trichloroethane ————— Carbon Tetrachloride ————— Vinvl Acetate ————— Bromodichloruimetha! .e ————— 1 . 2-Dichlcrcpro&ane - ———— cis-1 .3-Dichlcropropene ————— Trichloroethene ————— Di bromoc hlorome thane ————— 1 . 1 ,2-Trichloroethane ————— Benzene - ————— Trans-1 , 3-D ichloro pro pens ___ ————— Bromof crm ————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ————— 2-He::anone ————— Tetrachloroethene ————— 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ___ ————— Toluene — - ——— Ch lore benzene —— - —— Ethyl benzene - ———— Styrene ———— --Total Xylenes LO 60- 60 6O 20O 43 30 330 30 30 30 30 60 30 30 60 30 30 290 30 30 330 30 30 60 60 30 30 440 340 30 30 390 I I i'J ! L! i 1 i :u :BJ ;u ii :u :u :u :u :u :u !U ;u • i i t i LJ !U !B I I | :u i iU !U :u :u :u !U i i :u ! J i ii "FORMi VGA TUT 001 0372 1A ERA SAMPLE NC. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET BX984KSD I i -.*-» p _ - _ » — . ••" rr T M T r- L_ ^ L J '_* Lj Ui tr • '_. L_ X I I j •__• Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL P_____________ Contract: foSD9002B __ Case No.:. 1205S SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: 5X979 Sample wt/vcl: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (Icw/med) LCUJ '/. Moisture: net dec. 17 I Column: (pack/cap) PACK Lab Sample ID: S90107-1.9MSD Lab File ID: C0441_____ Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Analyzed: 06/25/89 Dilution Factor: 5.Q_____ I I COMPOUND CONCENTRATICN L'N ITS : (ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG / *T O . 74-83-9- 75-01-4- / w v <_• — •-• 75-09-2- 67-64-1- 75-15-0- 75-35-4- ~7 C ^ 1 "^ 75-.;>4-o- w' r »_' i_- i »_' ^. "T — A A "T " *" ~*~i"i ^ ^ — m Q -T -T -T •« er. c= /. c'£ ">"T — e- 4 i~i Q „ r^ ^ ^ -T r= *-\-r /i 10061-01 "^f"1 /~ -t /_ ./ fj~tJ±-.£<- •4 *~ rt /i r— . -^ r-t *•* /-% r= 7 -t /» -T *~l 10061-02 / *-• A_ • < »^. 108-10-1 BiO 1 ~7Q Z. 4 '-•-y ^ c £L / » •— • T -' 4 ,* . t-\ C~ ."^ T» j.Ocj— oo— •_•• •1 '"• '^ ^ !*• "^ 4 /"• »"l ^ t A 100-42-5 a. -^ •-• l-' *. •-' ——————— Chlorome thane -- —————— Bromoiue thane ——————— Vinyl Chloride ——————— Chloroethsne ——————— fiethylene Chloride ——————— Acetone ——————— Carbon Disulfide ——————— 1 , 1-Dichlcroethene ——————— 1 , 1-Dichloroethane ——————— 1 ,2-Dichloroethene ( total ) ——————— Chloroform —— - ———— 1 ,2-Dichloroethane _ ——————— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichlaroe thane ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride ——————— Vinyl Acetate ——————— Brc.T.odichlorome thane « r~t r\ • l_ 1 -• l,*. Dichloropropane -f ————— cis-i , 3-Dichloropropene -Trichlcroe there Dibromochloronethane ——————— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane ——————— Benzene -6 ————— Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene ___ Br omof orm ——————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2 Hex an one • ——— - ——— Tetrachloroethene ——————— 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachlorcethane ___ ----- ———— Toluene ——————— Chlorobenzene —————— Ethyl benzene • —————— Styrene ' -; ... • 7 —————— Total Xylenes 60 60 60 60 21 6O 30 30 30 3O 30 30 60 3O 30 60 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 60 30 30 30 30 30 30 3D 1 1 :u !U !U :u i T I U !U :u :u :u :u :u :u !'J :u :u !U ;u :u :u :u :u !U :u :u :u :u :u :u !U ;u :u :u !U !LJ TUT 001 0373 1A IPA SAMPLE- NO, OLATILE ORGAN I CS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: CEIMIC CORP Contract: 63D900: BX997 Lab Code: crriniC Case No.: 12058 SAS No.: SDG No.: BX973 1 Matri Gamp It | Level 7. Moi« ! Columr ! I 1 1^ 1 1- •-: : ( soil /water !• wt/val : : (low/med) sture: not dec i: (pack/cap) CA3 NO. -T n f-)-r T 74-8,:.-9 ———— 75-01-4 ———— 75-00-3- ———— 75-O9-2 ———— 67-64-1 ———— 75-15-0 ———— T C TT n ~T / ^ / / "^ 67— 66— -j' — ——— — 1 ('] 7 ("it "? — ~7Q O — — 7< e K / -L O w' C c / »-. -T tr. 10S-05-4 ——— 75-27-4 ————— 10061-01-5— 79-01-6 ———— 124-48-1 ——— 79-00-5 ———— 71-43-2— —— 10061-02-6 — 1 t"lr"1 * i~l 1 c o 1 ~7C3 i. *.'V_L / O O 127-^8-4 ——— 79-34-5 ———— 108-88-3- ——— 100— 11-4- ——— 100-42-5 ——— 1330-20-7 —— •; SOIL Lab Sample ID: 89O1O7-20 5.0 (a/mL) G Lab File ID: C0409 LOW Date Received: O6/ 10/59 21 Date Analyzed: 06/20/89 PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0 CONCENTRATIC COMPOUND (ug/L or uq, Chlorome thane — Bromome thane — Vinyl Chlorides ——— Chloroe thane ——— Methylene Chloride — Acetone ——— Carbon Disulfide — 1 , 1-Dichloroethene 1 . 1-Dichloroe thane ——— 1 ,2-Dichlcroetnene ( total ) ——— Chloroform ——— 1 ,2-Dichloroethene ——— 2-Butanone — 1 . 1 . 1-Trichloroethane ——— Carbon Tetrachloride ——— Vinyl Acetate Brofr.od ic hlorome thane ——— 1 .2-DichloroproDane ——— cis-1 . 3-Dichloropropene ——— Trichloroethene ——— Dibromochlorome thane ——— 1 . 1 ,2-Trichloroethane — Benzene ——— Trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene ___ — Bromof crm ——— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2 Hexanone — - — Tetrachloroethene ——— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroe thane ___ i oluene ——— Ch lore benzene ——— Ethyl benzene Styrene ——— Total Xylenes ]N UNITS: 'KG) UG/KG Q I l 13 : u C 13 ;u 13 :u 13 :u 13 : 6 !U 6 :u 6 :u 6 :u 6 :u 6 :u 13 !U 6 :u 6 :u 13 :u 6 :u 6 :u 6 :u 6 :u 6 :u 6 :u 6 :u 6 :u 6 :u 13 ;u 13 :u 6 :u 6 :u 6 :u 6 :u 3 UC 6 :u 15 it ± 1 •-1 / - ' • - ' * • . - " 203 FORM I VOA -' _l/87 Rev, TUT 001 0374 . 0 I£ LL! LL •'•L 1 - L'.! 0 1 >. . ij ' ri C 1 C 1 ij- 1 ! J l,; '.O i;l •". I ' - l l i i . ;-; 1 , 0r.j CM . ( 1 *\ *< I, i' . t- : ^ :. ;' , u -j U- l'. r- 1' i 1 ! " •-. <• • ... ! '. i : L J LJ ' - '- •;';' • l"' : '...' r- f ! t> Cr f. 1 ff- l co co cJ r.j .V I'-. f;. o r- o f) •-• . • -jj T-I T.-, r .1 •:> (j -•'. ••-. x U T-, <l -Jj -0 f) j'j J!' •:: •:.:• •_• C '-- f :J C'J l ' • • 13 ' • i.J •' ' -> - CJ O TI !J| TI 4J Lr! ••. !.i.l >-• - 0! -M iH U I" C': Lj .-• IJ !'! '0 n I-i ill n .-i 'ii >- LL : ' -i in L -H -.:i • - a iu u 4> 'C i- n- i; .-< tu x c a u j.. .1; -H cc: ii <r. -H u • . OJ U. TJ i-- IT' .'i in iu j l- TJ jj rj -:-' 4' -T-J ,n 'li 'li "i .J '5 -H 1. !•- ..j .1 u n n a i •' • ' f ' ] ~ J :' M ''? li'' 1. J - - , , "I 1 ! I A i ; c'J co! | c'l :.] ,; T. ;, .. ti 11 ! ' -u <. i I.H •-- M u j - II C ' II U . L. 10 CM r -J • Ct •-. C' u »•< -:.. :: . J- c.; i.: :'< f, LJ LI ' :i • -j ! u- id CJ ..-, U L- I* !l< -IT i« '1 !-; i u 'U ;,- i r •_ in r--. .'" •: -jJ .-; u r , -i . < :J1 •; i . 1 : 1 0 -H u i'i > -- - •« a iji *•-. ;ii ;i 3 n 4-i L u n •: •: i 7. J ••< iu M •u -iJ 4J :D M -. IJ "• Hi U r< CJ •" ' • ' -i '5 U L 11 ill 0 i- \ JJ '-' c. > i: H-- u } •« '.• .c :.u ;; (x x i >: ii -J r; t'J ti .• ::i D .;• •:• •".• •.:• - -i o ,;-, L'-i •:•• -•>. •-,' • -i U II ii L: ••! !l! li- .-- i: rj •.-i r..: L. r i: T- ::.i i-' -1 0 i" L ;. u. -.-* -:•' Ili Pi •n \: i V !l; rr r'i •-': rj ! 'I ! ! i ! 1 1 i i i ! r i o- J, i i i L. 1 1 l.j •:• I-'".' i/i ,1 .t 1 0- i.O u . 'JJ •:;.00 •T .--l I.II It. 0 t> •HIi. ! 1 1 ••-. ' v:J ' ~i ~ -o o T - I 0.1 cij ;j '!-nil r: .ij •H C! ff* i •o c'jn -J •:;• —i CO iiin != f-ii'i 4.' L .; • •'•i f^ •.-) 9 r-j'i. N fi 1 •=1- ^ ir; T I IJ 0 c- o! inf 1- i ITJ JI 4-; ii »• i ;.-. .C 4-' III C i; , 1 -U i U ~ 6 c CO C'j L III 4J !LI "*. i" IU 1-r •-.,- %-ii J: Ll. C CJ i- C. 0 ill '-< L Jt c, U .J. *"j" 1 u i j 1 1 M • i f 1 l'- r - * i ( j L'l (- 0 1 £& ) "i 00 o r-t ID ••• 1 .1 . i l~ i.ip -;-' •.-! ?. ± -0 . ~i -. •[ 100 TH rj | <i ri U C •ii 11 ^•1 ,•• Jt Oi V I 1) 1p 4" •.HIj -.-( f.)| -0 c- i. i 1n L',i r'.' U J ~'j 00 CO '-- T - l liJc I:l-j F--I CI IDj.:a •H 1 1nijip 4J •Hz T' -ij 1 (* -, 1 0I •JJ r'i n ;j J:1 •-.-• o •; c- •"• '- - O '"' T-I . t .-.:• ••-. co u ••.;• LT.I ^T L. J- |J i--i f 'i:u IJJ .* tj. L'j i"- i N ij --i i.: j. ui i.i iii c •' |J i: ..': :.- U !- u o - •: j: IJ r-l J.I T-1 L JI ij II 0 LJ J ii! L 'I* --' It ivj :: c Ui l ii! i'i j.: -: r n. o.. !i i ': \ 'l 1 i , i , •'. u: u, -1 ; n 0 T-i L'j | i 0 '•! !-• !•:. .•i i 1.0 OJ , • ( ; " n '•a. :j :D r-j C- 0 C.' 0 ... o o o o ... T-I >H r-i , < ,-;, CU C i CO CO U u III l> • ' 'u =5 ,--. .-• ij :[j •'" -.' '•'•-'. j.: r-j Ii a n .. < u -r-i ui it >j:: H 0 4J 4J II U ti II Oj Hi I'i'l i'J i' J;J i- !_ C .-* JJ H LJ IJ > Ij L ,-• c --H rn :>, .j • r <UL u. rn i i l ,;- 0 i N ! !•• 1. 1 cr o i . •-- <-; O ii.i ! ?'• 1 -0 0 - P C - , f i <••:•• 0 f J DJ • •i 13 f J -I (JJ '.i rj c o i '< i *i ••;• T-S -!J CO '• -\ iu' -••; i oi ••' iJ iii ij Jj ii U L !... J.I U iJ Jt icC I.! X--. -.-I .li u — : o - r-j 10 C - ill . !' ' UJI'I ! 1 1 1 i ! 1 ! ! ; L - 1 J' : ! ' f • ' r "i « ,''• "i L -. i ».;J •» 1.: LIJ ( 7i IJI 0 0 0 D C- C- jo •:;• co T-i . iii 4-1 -( ITJ f-' li! r. •-'• L._ ;i' rH Hi >. .17 i.i) -fl JI LL "v ^H I: >- Ill 4J -P Lt IU IJ 11 ! 0 J! I'J ..- '- LI _ ! i'l 1 I -,-( H j .n C"j l l I i ! i i i i i ! 1 1 l 1 '": Y •l T-I •;;• ;• iii cu 1 1 •ji r- r> -1 H - 1 1 ,H T-I II o ijj I.Uii li! i". L H f i LL Jt' -.». i'Jii[I iii 1-1' 1 t ' J C"c- U'J ;j u cu uit ILI -iJr ij r < L .- -- _'i '-'• U IJ £a; I'.i-i U'.l , -', r;- C J i'j T-i Co fll CIII L IX !u •-•n Ni. i ! i. ) i.J H 0 Lij n c- C.J *ii L >• Ll. .- ^ i""to r r-J j T-i ^' !j It U IJ ;•; ii ! j i 1 i IT! i ;;. • i ~: f .-1 - : 00 i '. ca Lb L. !;. II l-l JI 4-'r ''• -• i-. •. -iicij JJ • i-j V !ii - i *r (- j r- l i u r -"-' x •H OJ ij 1 !!! r-! iji 6. .--. ..j f. .;; '• 17' •••- Ui; L Ui ft! ii 1| ini rr f'-' |' •H Cr- T-l > ai O LL' fe\ T-I m -,0 » I , '. V- •{« ^ J- c - r-j o ,-H -'. 3" :-•- u, A in H :JJ r ^ ' U i:a i; n u L. e 0 L. '!- -a •ii -i-'"ii. fa-il it: • •• "j .i.- ;•;; !_ !" •';i 1 i i • J I 1A U C -r ^- • ' •• • -" : • - < • _ - - •"A- ' ' " KO I VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET :EIMIC ccF<F Contract: 6GD90025 Lab Code: CEIPT.!! Case No.: 12053 SAS No.: EPA SAMPLE NO. BX998 SDG T4o. : BX978 t Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vals 5.0 (g/mL) G_ I Level: (iow/med) LOW Lab Sample ID: 890107-21 Lab File ID: CO410 I 7. Moisture: rrat dec. 17 Column: (pack/cap) PACK Date Received: 06/10/39 Date Analyzed: 06/20/S9 Dilution Factor: i.0____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-ST—3.————————Chlorome thane____________ 74-83-9————————Bromome thane_____________ 75-01-4————————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-OO-3————————Chloroethane_____________ 75-O<?-2————————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-6*r—1————————Acetone_________________ 75-15—0————————Carbon Distil fide_________ 75-35—4————————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-3*—3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total ) 67-66-3————————Chloroform______________ 107-O&-2———————1,2-Dichloroethane_______ 78-93-3————————2-Btitanone______________ 71-55-6————————1,1,1—Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5————————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 103-05-4———————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-27—s—————————Bromcdichl orome thane______ 73-37-5————————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene___ 79-O1-6————————Trichloroethene__________ 124-4S.—i———————Dibromoc hi orome thane_____ 79-OO- -'5 ———————— 1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71 -43-2———•————Benzene_________________ 10061—02-6—————Tran=-l,3-Dichlorcpropene_ 75-25-2:———————Bromoform_______________ 108-1;:-!———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591 -73-6———————2—Hexanone_______________ 127-1E-4———————Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-5————————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 10S-SS-3———————Toluene_________________ 1 OS-9 0-7———————Chlorobenzene____________ 100-41-4———————Ethyl benzene____________ 100-42—5———————Styrene________________ 1330-2:0-7—————Total Xylenes____________ 12 12 27 21 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 6 6 1^. 6 6 . 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 6 6 6 6 85 6 6 FORM I VOA Q iU :u !U :u !U :u !U ;u :u :u ;u :u ;u :u :u :u :u :u ;u :u :u :u :u :u :u ;u :u :u i !'u v •u _l "I LIT . 1/87 Rev. 001 0376 1A •""> t~» f~* *•-. *v i T *'"• r^ •-» » i /•-. i \ / r^ T (*•* T™\ ,~i, T~ /\ r^ • t *• or\OM.M u,a MIMI-II_ i a i b i. f-i I n m-.c I EPA SAMPLE NO, VBLK01 rab Name: CEIMIC CQRP Lab Cjjde: CEI• 11c Case We.: 12055 I Mstri:;: (sail/water) SOIL Sample wt/vcl: 5.0 (g/rr.L.) §_ I Level: (Icw/med) LOM Con tract: 63D9002S ! _________ SAS No.: SDG Ma.: BT747 Sample ID: V030615-B1 Lab File ID: C0348______ 7. Moisture: not dec. O Column: (pack/cap) PACK CAS NO. Date Received: 06/03/89 Date Analyzed: 06/15/S9 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 0 74-87-3——— ———— Chloromethane____________ 74-63-9————————Bromofne thane_____________ 75-01-4————————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3————————Ch lores thane____________ 75-09-2————————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1————————Acetone__________________ 75-15-0————————Carbon Disulfids_________ 75-35-4————————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0————-——1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3————————Chloroform_______________ 107-06-2———————1,2-Dichloroethane________ 7S-93-3————————2-Butanone_______________ 71-55-6- — ————— 1,1, i-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5-————————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 103-05-4—--————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-27-4 ———————— Bromodichlorome thane______ 73-S7-5————————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene___ 79-01-6————————Trichloroethene__________ 124-48-1———————Dibromochlorome thane______ 79-00-5————————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2————————Benzene_______ 10061-02-6—————Trans-1,3-Dichloroprop6ne_ 75-25-2————————Bromof orm________________ 10O-10-1———-———4-ttethyl-2-Pentanone______ 591-7S-6———————2-Hexanone_______________ 127-1S-4--—————Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-5————————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-83-3———————Toluene__________________ 108-90-7-———————Ch lore benzene____________ 100-41-4———————Ethyl benzene_____________ 100-42-5—-——'•—-Styrene__________________ 1330-20-7———--•—Total Xylenes____________ 10 10 10 1C 0. C'• 5 5 5 5 5 e: ^,1 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 :u :u ;u :u :u : a :u :u !U :u !U :u :u !U !U 1U :u !U :u :u :u iu :u !U :u iu :u !U !U :u :u !U :u iu FORM I VQA ruT 001 0377 1A VOLATILE ORGANIC3 ANALYSIS DATA SMEE' F.FA SAMPLE NO. VBLK02 Name: CEIKIC CORP Lab Cods: CEIMIC Case N=.: 12058 Contract: 6SD9002S !_________ SAS No. : ______ SD3 No. : ET747 i Ka tri:; : ( soi 1 /water ) SOIL Samp1a wt/vo1: f Level: 5. 0 (g/mL) G_ (low/mec) LOW "/. Moisture: net dec. __0 Lab Sample T Lab File ID: V3O616-B2 CO361 Column: (pack/cap) PACK CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Received: 06/OS/39 Date Analyzed: 06/16/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG G- -» n P-.-T -T -T A C'~* r~l 7C {-* -» ft ^' L' -L 't ™ 75-00-3 —— —— 75-09-2 —— —— 67-64-1 ————— "7C. 1 ^ A — -TI= -T er f\ -7 1= ~T n -T 540-59-0 — -— 67-66-3 —— —— 107-06-2 —— — 78-93-3 ————— -T 4 t= e / E t~\ *- C *_' i_« "7Q C-"7 «^ 10061-01-5 —— 79-01-6 —— — - 124-48-1 — —— 79-00-5 ————— ~T 1 /» ^ »"•* 10061-02-6 —— -7 e <-»i= *-* 108-10-1 ———— e o 1 "7O Z, w'V 1 / O O 127-13-4 ———— 79-34-5- ———— •1 f'lO OQ T 100-42-5 ———— 4 -^" •» j"» <~t r*\ T X •— ' •— • •-' -— .' / • —— C hi orome thane - —— Bromome thane —— Vinyl Chloride -Chlo roe thane — Methvlene Chloride —Acetone —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1 , 1-Dichloroethene 1,1 Dichloroethane —— 1 ,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ — —Chloroform —— 1 ,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone —— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichlcroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Vinyl Acetate —Bromodic hi orome thane 1,2 Dichloropropane cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene — Trichloroethene — DibrotTicc hi orome thane —— 1 . 1 ,2-Trichloroethane Benzene —— Trans-1 . 3-Dichloropropene _ — BrotnoTorm —— 4-Me thy 1 -2-Pen tanone — II xi He:-; an one —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1 , 1 , 2,2-Tetrachloroethane Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethyl benzene Styrene —— Total Xylenes 10 « r\ 10 10 5 1O 5 5 5 5 5 10 «=i 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 V.1 5 10 10 5 5 «i *.' . 5 5 . :u :u :u • 1 1 1 1 1 i * i 1 1 1 i U ' 1 1 i U 1 1 1 i U ' 1 1 i U i LJ ' 1 1 i U 1 1 1 i U !U i | I :u i U 1 1 1 > 1 1 i U 1 1 1 i U i U 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 :u i 1 1 i U 1 1 1 1 1 1 : u i i i * 1 1 • • u . * i U _ _ • u 3Q • u o*J • • FORM I VOA TUT 001 0378 IA VCLATILE CT2AMICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Srab Name: CEIMIC CORP r~ .-• *j*r, I r- t -^ C.:i-i! if Li_ .* J . Lab Code: CEIMIC Contract: 63D90028 SAB No.: ___ VBLK03 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL . Sample wt/vol : 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW 7. Moisture: not dec. __0 Column: (pack/cap) PACK Lab Sample ID: V30617-B2 Lab File ID: C0372 Date Received: O6/OS/S9 Date Analyzed; 06/3.7/8° Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CAS MO. COMPOUND CONCENTRAT I ON UN11TS : (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG -Ch 1 orofnetnane -Vinyl Chloride. -Ch lores thane __ -Methylene Chloride, -Acetone_______ 74-57-3______ 74—83—9————————Brcfr.Qfne thane 75-01-4———— 75-00-3———- 75-09-2———— 67-64-1——— 75-15-0————— 75-35-4————— 75-34-3—~— 540-59-0——— 67-66-3———— 107-06-2———— 78-93-3————— 71-55-6————————1,1, 1-Trichlorcathane 56-23—5————————Carbon Tetrachl cride_ 10S-O5-4—————-—Vinyl Acetate________ -Carbon Disulfids -1 , 1-Dichloroethene -1 , 1 -Die hloroe thane -1,2-Dichlcroethene -Chloroform _______ ' (total). -1,2-Dichloroethane. -2-Butanone ____ -Dibromoc hi ore-methane_ -1,1, 2-Tr.ichlcroethane_ -Benzene_______ __ 75-27-4————————Bro~;odic hi orctre thane___ 78-87-5———>————1,2-Dichloropropane____ 10061-O1-5—————ciE-1,3-Dichloropropene. 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1———- 79-00-5----- 71-43-2————— 10O61-02-6—————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene. 75-25-2————————Bromoform________________ ioa-io-1—— 591-78-6——- 127-18-4——— 79-34-5————————1,1,2.2-Tetrachloroethane. 1OS-3S-3———————To 1 uene____________________ 108-9O-7———————Chlorcbenzene____________ 100-41-4———————Ethyl benzene_____________ 100-42-5———————Styrene_________________ 1330-20-7——————Total Xylenes______________ -4-Methyl-2-Pentanone. -2-Hexanone__________ -Tetrachloroethene 10 10 10 10 4 10 5 5 5 5 10 C 5 10 c: 5 5 5 5 5 10 1O 5 FORM I VOA ;u i J :u !U :u :u !U i i i i LJ :u ;u :u :u ;u !U :u :u ;u ;u !U :u !U :u :u :u :u ;u ! J :u :u :u :u \/B7 Rc-v. TUT OO1 O379 CW Eanpj.^ i t/vc::". l Level: (low/,ied) _ •• Mci^t;.!rr=: --.ct. dec. ___ Q CZciuir.riS ( pack/c»f: ) PACr! CCMF'OU^D G_ Ccn tract: 68D9C02G I_________ 3AE No.; SDG No,: HT747 Lab Sample ID: r:90l07-Q4 Lab File ID: C03o£> Date Received: 06/08/R9 Date Analysed: • "Vj/lg/g?*? Dilution Frctcr: 1 . 0_____ CONCENTR AT I C!M UN ITE : (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG . n G? _ 7 5-01--"- ------ --—— 'in/1 Chloride. 75-00-3———••—-—2h lores th".e 75-09-2—-—————Msthylene Chloride. 67-64-1—————•——Acetone _____ 5-0————————Carbon Disulfids '5-35-4————————1 .1-Dichlcroe-thene 540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3———————Chloroform 107-06-2-—————-1,2-Oichlorcethane. 78-^'3-3--— -—-—2-Eiutar.cne T--27-- 4-—-—•-•—ErrjriodichlorcTi3thane. 73-37'-T- — - —— -—1, 2-D ic!~ lore pro pc.ne_ -----——ci=-l ,3-Dichlorcpropene. —————Tri -rr. lorcethene________ 79-01-6--——————- 124- 40-.1 —••—--——Dibromochlorcmethane_ 77-00-5----—-—-——1,1,2-Trichloroethane. 71-43-2—•————Scnzsne___ _________ 10061-02-6-—-——Trans-1,3-Di = hlcropropene_ -1 -Ma thy I -2-Pen tar.one. - 2 - H e ;•; t; none _______ —Tetrach1orcethene 10S-10--1——- 591-73-6—— 127-1S-4——— ________ 79-34-5-——-——-—1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane. 108-82-3 — ——-—-Tcluene_ __________ 10E-90-7---—————Chlcrobenzene___________ 100-41- 4-—————--Ethyl benzene_____________ 10 0 - 4 2 - - 5-——————St'-.-' r e n e _________________ 1330-20-7——————Total X/lenes 24 o 10 407 FORM I VOA TUT 001 0380 Rev. I I 1A VOLATILE GRGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SKEE EF'A SAMPLE NO, b£b N, Lab Cc ttatr.1: Sample Level y. Moic Columr -line: r-EIMir CO Dde: cnriTC ; : ( soil /water * t-vt/vol : : ( Icw/rr.ed 5 Eture: not dec i : (pack /cap) CAS NO. -T n ^-? -* / • H o / 74.. P~r o / ~ w •— ' * 75-01-4 — -- — 75-00-3 — --- 75-09-2 —— — 67-64-1 ———— 75-35-4 ———— / »-• •— "*T •-' 540-59-0 ——— / ~T / / ""^ 67-66—0 — — — — — 107-06--' —— - 78-93-3 ———— "7 « c c / / 4. -..i D C c i. —,T t: w W *. •_• ^' 1O8-05-4 ———— 75-27-4 ----- 7S-37-5 ———— 1 ri i"» z. 1 t~-i 1 = J-U'-'O-. '.'1 _' -TO /•> 1 A / V I.' 1 O 1 ^d * C 1 iiin *tD 1 79-00-5 ————— -^ 4 A -T >-\ / J. ^ _' -L. 10061-02-6 — o.l.'u I.1.' J. i-'Va. i o o J. ^. / * -_r H 79-34-5 ———— 1 /"i O O *""* "^ lUa /'.' / 100-41 -' —— - 1 00-4^-5- -—— 1330-20-7 —— ! VELK05 PP Contract: 6SD9002S ! Case Nn.: 17O5G SAS No.: EDG No.: BX97S ) SOIL Lab Sample ID: V'20619-Bl 5.0 (q/mL) 3 Lab File IDs C0399 LOW. Date Received: 06/O3/S9 0 Date Analyzed: O6/ 19/39 PACK " Dilution Factor: 1.0 CONCENTRATIC COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/ Chl orome thane Bromine thane —— .-Vinvl Chloride Chloroe thane ——— Methylene Chloride ——— Acetone Carbon Disulfide ——— i . i-Dichloroethene ——— 1 . 1-Dichloroethane ——— 1 ,2-Dichloroethene (total) Chloroform ——— 1 ,2-Dichloroe thane ——— 2-Butanone ——— 1 , 1 . i-Trichloroethane ——— Carbon Tetrachloride ——— Vinyl Acetate ——— Bromodichlcrome thane 1 . ii Dichloroprcpane ——— cis-i ,3-Dichloroprcpene ——— Trichloroethene ——— Dibromochlorome thane ——— 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroe thane ——— Benzene ——— Trans-1 . 3-Dichloropropene ——— Bromoform ——— 4-Methvl-2-Pentanone ——— 2-Hexanone ——— Tetrachloroethene ——— 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ——— Toluene ——— Chlorcbenzene ——— Ethyl benzene ——— Styrene ——— Total Xylenes 3N UNITS: 'Ken UE/KG 10 10 10 10 11 10 *-l *_ 5 5 5^ 5 10 X 5 10 5 5 5 5 2 5 5 5 5 10 1O 5 5 5 -f 5 5 5 Q i t U u u u u J u u u J u u J 1 t t_. u u u u u J u u u u u u u u u J u (I u 283 1 1 FORM I VOA TUT O01 0381 i -.t 4- -i- T i *— f—• I— r" /* I i T f- r^ •\v;,-Ki \ i r- T r" T- -v -i- .- •— I >•"- •— • . '.ji_.i~i i IL.C. uj i . u l-t I '-i i L- o I-IIMI-IL- i ;- ± a iJr-i i t~\ .;;ri::i::_ VBLK06 Lab Co I'atri;,' Level; : i :v ___ Cc,se Mo.; 12053 i/^s.ter'i SOIL 5 . 0 (g/mL) G ( low/.T.i-ci) LOUj i r-i~t dec. _ 0 CQlL.-;r, •; j:aci.:/csp) PAC COMPOUND Contract: ^GD90C2g PAS No.: Lab Sample ID: VC617-B1 El 6 50 ile ID; Date Received: 0&/O2/S9 Date Analysed: '''6/19/8° Dilution Factor: 1 _..0____ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG -3 —————— - — CnlorofTiethane _ --9 — -• —— -- — B ro.-narr.e t han e -4 — - —————— Vinyl Chloride -:;- ———————— Chlorc£2thane 67- 09 64 15 2 ———————— Methylehe Chloride -i— •• —————— .Acetcne C- Carbon Disulficie 67-66- 4- ——————— 1 , i-Dichloroethsne _______ 3 ————————— 1 , 1-Dichloroethr.nc:' _________ -0 ——————— 1 .2-Dichlcroetnene ( tctal ) 7-- — ——— --Chloroform _______________________ 6-2 ——————— 1 ,2-n-ichlcroethsr.e -3- ———— - —— 2-Putanone -,':-- — - ———— 1,1,1-Trichlorcsthane -5-- — - ————— Carbon T&trachloride 1'"- • • - - — ----- —— Vinyl Acetate? i 006 1 - ———————— Bromodichlorome thane ———————— 1 , 2-Dichl orapropane 0 1-5- — ——— c i = - 1 , 3-D i c h 1 o r o p r c pene 6- ——————— Trichloroethene 1,1,2-Tr.ichloroe thane Benzene —— —— Trans-1 , 3-Dichlaropropene Bromoform 108-10-1— 591-73-6 127-13-4- 79-34-5-- lOE-E'S-7 4-Methyl-2-Pent£.none 2-He;-:anone _ Tetra.chloroethene 1 .1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Toluene -Chlorobenrene Ethyl benzene Styrene -:--7- —————— Total' Xylenes 10 10 10 t= 5 t;_ 5 5 5 •=, 10 10 c 5 c= >.l 5 5 5 5 U L! FORM I VGA TUT 001 0382 1A VOLATILE C3RGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET r"pr*./N *~ /"• tr 1-1 oi-i Name: CEI^IC CORP VBLK07 Lab Codei CEIMIC Case No.: 12053 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G_ Level: (low/med) LOW 7. Moisture: not dec. __0 Column:' (pack/cap) PACK Contract: A3D9002B ________ SAS No. : ______ SDG No. : BX97S Lab Sample ID: V3O620-B1 Lab File ID: C04O6 Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Analyzed: 06/20/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ I CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3————————Chlorome thane____________ 74-S3-9————————Bromome thane_____________ 75-01-4————————Vinyl Chloride______________ 75-00-3————————Chloroe thane_____________ 75-09-2————————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1————————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0————————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4————————1,l-Dichloroethene:______ 75-34-3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3————————Chloroform _____________ 1O7-06-2———————1,2-Dichloroethane_______ 7S-93-3————————2-Butanone_______________ 71-55-6————————1,1,1-Trichlorcethane____ 56-23-5————————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 108-05-4———————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-27-4————————Bromodichlorome thane______ 78-87-5————————1, 2-Dichloropropane_______ 1O061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene___ 79-01-6————————Trie hi oroethene__________ 124-48-1———————Dibromochlorome thane_____ 79-OO-5-———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2————————Benzene •-••~- ••'-•.•'^•'•' •--.____.<*• 10061-02-6—————Trans-1 ,,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2————————Bromoform____• •• ______ 108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______ 591-73-6———————2-Hexanone ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ 127-13-4———————Tetrachloroethene 79-34-5————————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-S8-3———————Toluene ' -• •'_____ -' •' 108-90-7———————Chlorobenzene____________ ICO-*.1.-4———————Ethyl benzene ____________ 1 00-42-5————:——styrene'-^-'^-"••-;-*>'•••- • •- -•••- 1330-20-7—————Total Xvlenes ' --^ " • • 1C 10 10 10 5 4 5 5 5 5 10 1 *n 10 e=( 5 5 ^l jL. 5 5 5 5 1 10 10 5 5 5 5. 5 G :u !U :u !U :u ; a !U :u :u :u ; j : j :u ; j : j :u :u :u ;u : j ;u !U :u :u : j :u :u :u :u :u :u :u :u TUT OO1 0383 :i CFSA; ;•:•;;:- ANALYSIS "":~A CHEF" .or : Contract: £8090025 2AE Me . i ______ EFA SAMPLE i PY704 PX97° SC?IL Lab S~.-r.ple ID; £90107-30 Lab Fi.le ID: A1253 ._•_-. t_-.. LGI-J 3FC •action : II L'ar.up: t r!cc . ___ 9_ dec. ____ < SecF/Ccn t/Sanc ) SCNC (Y/N) N __ pHi Date Received: 06/13/39 Date Extract-Be!: 06/13,'G? Date? Analyzed: C 6'.-'2 9.'59 Dilution Factor: 1 . 0_____ UMIT<=: 'ug/L cr -.Jc/Ka) U5/KG :•. S-- = -2———-—Phenol. _--:-••-^4-^—--————bis(2-Chlci-Get!-,yl )i - f-5.•-•-• — ----- —— 2-Chlorophenol_______________'. 3 :-l- i -73-1 —— — —— i , 3-D i c h 1 ore ben z en e __________! 106--6-7-—-- ——— 1 , 4-Dichlor obenze?ne__________! 100- = l-6 —— -———Benzyl Alcohol_______________! 9 - - SO-1 - — --———— l , 2-Di c h 1 oroben z sne_________! ?!:-4S-7~———————2-Msthyl phenol_______________! 39t3B-32--9—————bi£(2-Chloroisopropyl ) Ether_! 106-'.-4-5- ——————4-Methyl phenol___________ ! 621-64-/-— —— —N-Nitrcso-Di-n-Fropylsmir.e__• 67-72-1-———— ~^-^-'.—— — - — — T s o p h c i _________________ ;>.. ---';- ...............—— -.. Nit.rcpnerirji_________________: ;.'! rj--::7 r---- ——...-—._2 , 4-Dinethyl phenol___________; 6r>-£5-0 -- -------Benzcic Acid_________________i :.ll-c?l-l- — -—~-b.i5(2-rhlorocth--:-;y) Methane__! 120-97-2--- —— -- — 2,4-Dichlcrophenol___________! :.20-81?-1-————— 1,2., 4-Trichi orobensene______! .'. '-•--'• :: ••'''- — - - -- ^---Ch 1 r-roa-n iline ' -7-;. -c -3- ------- — -Ms xachl o rebut ad iene_____|___! ':.=J-50-7 ———'-— —4-Chloro-3-M6 thy 1 phenol______! ?1- -^7-6 ----- -•-———-2-i -ID thy 1 naphtha Iene___________i T-.-/ 7-4--.—.———— He xachlorocyclopen tad iene___! LS->':.--2—- — ---——2 , 4 , 6-Trichlorophenol ________! 0-=.-9-:-i—.-.— --.—2,4 , 5-Trichlcrophencl________i v:-vr-~————- —— 2-Chloronaphthalene_________1 —-rirr:ii--h\ 1 F'.-thalTte ~" ~l - 2 , 6-D i n i t r o to 1 men e __________ 1 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 3iO 360 360 360 36 O 1 GOO 360 360 360 1400 360 360 360 1700 360 360 1SOO 360 • IS 00 360 360 360 . L! ;u :u 1U iLJ :u :U :u : J ILJ !U ;LJ !U !U I SV-i TUT OOl 0384 1C rfr-. I VOLATILE ORGANJCS ANALYSTS DATA ?<-!FET SAMPLE NO. b Name: LilTf-lC CfjRp Con t ract: 0&D9002S I l.a.b Cc.de: C.E:jlIC__ Case No.: .1 2059 SAS Mo.: Matri:;: ( soi i /vjate-r ) SOIL I Sample i.'t/'-ol: 30_. 8 (g/mL) G_ Level: (Ic-w/fj.sd; I..DU) ''. Moisture: not dec. 9 aec. _____ SDG No.: BX97B Lab Sample ID: 89Q1Q7-30_ Lab File ]D: A1258 Extraction: '• SepF/Cont/Sonc} SONG 3PC Cleanup: (Y/N) N__ . pH: 9.1 Gate Received: 06/13/89 Date Extracted: 06/13/S9 Date Analvsed: •:'6^2 Dilution Factor: 1.0_ CAS NJ. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: ( u a / L o r u a / K q ) U G / K G Q •-•- ._(• .-•_-._ 51-23-5- 1. OO— 02— 7 I -T*-** , n r~» 121-14-2 * — i n i • r~i 7005- -'2- 36-73-7- 100— 1O— 6 e: T /i KI -— \ H 8A-3O-6- 101-55-3 1 i E' — •" — 1 O _.i I.) 1 O 120-12-7 r-. i -T n —\ *_ '-' '. J ~T T *J 129— O 0—0 85-68-7- 91-94-1- 56-':-5-3- *-\ + r t i-\ •* o < - -T ,— , -» -? 1 1 ~7 *"• " r~i J. J. / — c? *t t.' '~\/~\ c: /—i •—% -~i 207-OB-9 5O-32-3- 193-39-5 C T -? .- "?• ..1 . j / '..' _' 191-24-2 - — ———— 3-Ni troe.ni ] me - — - ——— Acenaphthene xi , 4 Dinitrophenol ——— — — 4-Ni trophenol - —————— Dibenzof ura.n ——————— 2 . 4-Dini trotoluene ——————— Diethy 1 phthalate 3- ————— 4-Ch 1 orophenv 1 -pheny 1 e t her -— — — — — F luorene — -- ———— 4— Mi troani 1 ine —— ———— 4, 6-Dinitro-2-Methyl phenol N Nitrosodi pheny 1 amine 1) ______ - —— —— -4-Brofficpnenv 1 -pheny 1 ether — — ——— Hexachl or o benzene —— ———— Pen tachlorophenol — — ———— P hen an threne —— ———— Anthracene — —————— Di-n-Butyl phthalate —— ———— Fluoranthene — —— —— Rvrene ———— —— Butyl benzyl phthalate ----- ———— 3, 3' -Dichlorobenzidine - ——— ——— Ben 20 ( a ) Anthracene - —————— bis(2-Ethyihe;;yl ) Phthalate ——————— Di-n-Octvl Phthalate - —————— Benzo( b JFluoranthene —— ———— Ben 20 ( k: ) Fluoranthene Bei izo ( a ) Pvrene Indeno( 1,2, 3-cd ) Pyrene —— - ——— Dibenz ( a , h) Anthracene Ben 20 ( q , h , i )Perylene 1300 360 .A. O1.' .' 360 360 -T l^ /-_ J' O U 360 150 1800 360 360 360 1300 14O 360 360 360 360 360 7 CO 360 •_ o-.' 240 360 -T ft~\ •J'QU 36 O 360 36O -.' W *./ •_'O».' : u i t » i uJ :u !U i i i :u !U !U 1 I :u :u :u !U. :u :u : J !U :u 1 I 1 ID 1 1 ) !U !U :u ; j 1 1 1 :u :u i i i :u ID 1 1 1 : be separated from Dipheny 1 amine FORM I SV-2 TUT O01 0385 .'37 Rev r— r-. /\ ,—- f t J r"-« r— K I ~^ L-_ r 1-1 c: M i • i,-. i. c. T!_! . — • — M T I I f~< I A -T" T I I— • .— • t— . — • /x I • T f— r- f. K i /-i I * / r~ ^- r- •• -% - .:- — : i j. vLi.-1-i i J.I..E u'. -iifi-:ii i i. c. i -IIV..-IL. : £ i r. , - r i T-. ' / -^ -I ,-. .- i / :• •--• / r-. f -, r- .-,.-. ITi c9C'i••'• 7-j 1 I ••veil : . tr.v.c •r- r - • — •• w L. . i~ Or I i i C; 11 u» d C ti-r,: (Se-F ssnup: (Y/l' — -- r~ K r-. •_„ !-•;;• 1 . V.J . _ '-• CT - .._ "T .'. *~. / .. ' _ 1 ^ r~~ 1 L r~ ' ^ —— ~ ^^ r r 1 *"* / -~1 -•.-.-. ^ J,. j.ii_ 1 iT i.--:. w i -. J. fci 1 J-' . r-:l ^..t'-- L D %' D a t e R e c e- i v e d : 0 6 / i Z , ' 3 9 23 dec. Date,- E:;tracted: 06/13/89 .'Cont/Sonc) 9.C'.IC Date Analyzed: 06/29/89 ) N pH : 9.0 r-j 1 u.tion Factor: J.O CGNCENTRAT I ON UN ITS: CC.MFC: ^D (uc/L -r ua/Ka ) UG/KS 0 ——— F:-enol 11 1-4 4-4 ——————— biE(2-ChloroethvlJ Ether r-t rr c — r r-. 5 /1 « — '-» 4 _ T A / •_• 1 106-46-7 - —— 100-51-6 ——— 9 <= — 1 ^ "^ 4 f~* t n, n n e *~> 4 f f\ T / — T __ — 7 >-^ __ •( __ __ __ _ 9G-95-3 ———— F3-75-5- ———— 65-85 --0- —— -- 111-91-1 ———— 1 T' '') t- "' 1 t-\ H *-,,-• -T V JL -- . 106-47-E - —— 87-63-3 ——— — c- (-. r- .-^ -* 91-57-6 ———— 77-47-4 ———— SS-06-^ — — - 0 <=: C C=. ... £ 7 w* / ^' ~ 91-58-7 — —— oo -7 « 4 tJ U^ / ^' 1 i 31-1 1-.:-,- —— *"i »•. r-. o ' <~i 606-10-2- —— ——— 2-Chl oro phenol - i , _:, - D i c h i o r a b t-n z e n e ——— 1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene ——— Benzyl Alcohol ——— 1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene ——— -2-:icthy 1 phenol ——— bis (2-ChloroisC'propy 1 ) Ether _ ^ hethyl phenol ——— N— Ni troso-Di-n-Propyl aiTiine - - — He x ac h 1 c roe t han e ——— Ni trobenr ene —— -I so^horone —— -_-r Ji tropheno 1 ———— 7. , 4-Oitr.er.hy 1 phencl ——— Eenzoic Acid ——— bis ( 2-Chlorcethc;:y } Methane ——— 2 , 4-Dichl cro phenol ——— 1 , 2 , 4-Trichlor^be?nzene ——— Naphthalene- - —— 4-Chloroani 1 ine - —— He- .; <? c !-i 1 ore bu 1 3d i cne ——— 4-Chloro-3-Methy 1 phenol ——— ^-Mcc-thyl naphthalene Hexa-_hlcrocyc lopentadiene ——— 2,4 , 6-T rich lor ophenol ——— 2 .4 , 5-Trichlorophenol ——— 2-Chloronaphthalene 2 Nitroaniline ——— Dimethyl Ph thai ate —— --Acenaphthy lene —— -? , 6-Dini trotoluene 430 1 'J 43O !U 430 ! U 430 ! L.! ^30 !L! 430 ! U . 4 30 i L: 43O 1 U 430 I U A 30 ! D 430 ! U 43O ! U 430 !U 43O !U 430 1 U 43O I L) 2100 ;u 430 ,'LJ 430 ; U 430 ! U 310O ! 430 ID 430 ! L! 430 ! U 2500 ! 430 ! U 43O I U 2100 ;u 430 ! U 2100 :u 430 !U 430 i U 430 ! U 1 1 47 FORM I SV'-l 1/87 Rev, TUT 001 0386 1 * 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1C EFA BAMPL2 MO . i i BY710 ::: •'• •.-.-;. IVUr.'.'.r: -2PP Cor.tracr.: 6S29O022 I ---•:- .;.:;•: '/:::::. Cite ;" •:•-•. j J..205R . 2AS '-!D.: SD3 No.: E'X9~^ •<:..'-ri :. ,.::::.i/., a •;•:;;••; SOIL Lab Saiv.Gle 12: 890107-31 ?-.n.-lv --I've..!; 30.2 (G/n-iL) G Lab File ID: A12iO Lc-velr ( low/ir-ed ) LOW Date Received: 06/13/99 •/. i':ci=---Lii e: r.ct c!sc . 23 dec. Date Extracted: 06/13/99 Extr v:::'::.c:r;: ( SepF/C^n t/Sonc ) SCNC Date P SFC 21jai-up: (V/H) N __ pH : 9 . 0 Diluti CONCEN7PATIC •-- -•--.. - - ' .- - - - - - I'-i •_ e r. a p h t h e n e 5.V- 28-r — — ———— -2, 4-D in it roc he-no i 1 100-02-7------ —— -4 -Nitre: phenol ! ......:.: (_'••--.'"• ----- -ijibenzof uran i 121 -I— 2- —————— 2, 4-Dinitro toluene v , • G4-/.0-2-— ----- —— Diethvlphthalate • .- •-.'.-.:• ...:•.. 4 Lhiorcphenyl pheny 1 ether __ > tt . . . - - 7 - - - - Flu^rciit i 100-1 ;-::—— ———— 4-Nitraaniline Ci-3v~6—— - ————— N-Nitr=soc!iphenylaffiine (1} - : " --- ~-7 -- — —— --•-Brcmcpheny 3. -pheny 1 athcr ____ : -.-'"•-•""-'• i-- —— — -Hexachl^robenzenc '-7-:'. ••'"•-• • -- -— ---rt-rit.?.t::~. Ic.rcrhenol . "•.--• - : •-•- • Fhtnanthrene ! : 20- ; :.--••------ —— Anthracene ; 84- -4 -2-— ———— -Di-n-SutylDhthalate i 206- -"-- -0---- ——— Fluoranthene •*• •""• r^ >"• •* * r*i . r ._ .^ ,_ ._ i .i... 1- . ,_.-.-• — — - i-yrene , P:V. ,.,.. .„._.. — — -Patylbenzylphthalate . c:. -•:.-;..—-.---..-. —— 3,3'-richlor^be-nzidins . I- >-.•>-? -..:-.:- -- - r.-'fiii-uf a) Anthracene i *•» . j r*. ,-. t /-, r- i ••-—-- - -- t._ ; i ! f r^.- 1.1 PI *:? ; 117-E1-7 ----- — -— bis(2-E*hylhexyl JPhthalate __ ; 117-84-:. —— - ——— Di-n-Octvl Phthalate ; 20r:--'--2-- ——— —— BenzQ(b)Flucranthene l~ ,- -r - , • •. .— i- y 1 \ 1 — 1 II i ,....-. -- -c .••--•• — -— t-sinzc ( k ii'- j. i-iufan i. hsnvr , 3.0-32-8------ — — Benzc ( a ) F'vrene i -• •— . — — C" r- "" i ' •• f~^ ~~" • • r-, 1 j. / .. -• w1 j,rtCj&PiCj^--n^.( -..• tl w / i y ( tH i £r -T "" '--•• - - - • • • - -----DibenL (a. h; Ari thracer.c ; :.. 7 1-;"-"--- 2- ----- -- -^enzc ( q , h , i } F'e-ry lens ^^ ralvzed: r"^/2c/S9 en Factor : 1 . O N L'!-JI73: : i 2100 !U 430 : J 2100 !U 2100 !U 430 ;:_• 430 : u 430 : 'J iso ;j 2100 i'J 2100 :J 430 I L' 430 U ^30 ' J 2:00 ;j 1 7 '.- , •-* 130 i'J ' - — ,-, • i — -..••_• , -.j 430 I'J ^30 : U 430 ; LJ 360 ; :j 430 , J 430 ! U 95 ' J 430 ! U 430 I LJ 430 I U ^30 ! LJ 43-:; • j 430 1 LJ 430 i LJ I i A7 Clarinet ::•::- -i-sparated from Dipheny 1 FGRM I TUT 001 0387 a7 Rev. • ••• I"A iAMRLE N3. i- '-1 r- ^ i _ — \/ f--—T I- w> JL. ^ i -: i_, . : i /- ; . t L«b Sample IT; 3-0107-32 (g/.-nL) "'. .•'.:-:-i~ • urr- ; net rcc . 2~ 2 I ! . Received: Oa/l Date E:;tr&cte=r 0^/1 •Y/N; w_ rH: Dilution F^ctcr: 3 . 0 C ~ r- t. : — , I--... I -,_ . - — ——— 2-Chlcrophcnol ____________ ' 541-77-1——-———-1 ,3-Dich'l zrcbcnzcr.e ________ 1 lCd-46-7-—-———1.4-Dichlorcbenzcne_______ ; 100-31-6-——————Bsnzyl Slcchol___________ , 95-20-j———— --——1 ,2-Dichlorobcr.zene_______ 1 75-4E-7———————2-Methylphenol____________ : 3^630-32-9————3is(2-Chlorcisoprozyl )Ether. ! _ '..','.; "•• -:T *4 — ^7" ~ — —"— — — — — *% — is £} i*. 11"..-" ji "., "i £ r*^ CD A ___ i £.. -^ a "~ *. *•• " / ~~ * "" "~; \ — • x j. w *~ u.- '1- ^ — »-' * """ Pi r i i 67- 72-1 ———— - — -Hexachlcrcerths.re__________ ~~ *~" ~~"" —""~ — .v iii '_• f" i i o r ^ r~i (•• — ~"~"~ —' ™ -—-- __._•"•.'., j. T^ j-"" ~ r • t" r^_ j~, t~~» A 6r.-35-••>---——---Bi=nzoic ^cid______________ , 111-71- 1—- —— -—-biE(2-C hi crz.e the:; y^c thine;. ; 120- S3--2-—-———2,4-Dicnlcrophenol________ ; 120--32-1————-1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene____ : i-;6-4~--3-------- ; ^T-^O-7—----———i-Ch!wro-3-Msthylpher.3i_ : cl- r.'.7--:'.;---—-- —— 2-Methylri£phth£.l£:-rie_____ ! "77-47--"--—-----—i-'cxachlcrozyc Icpen tB.c'.ier.t . 3~"-Of-2~— -————-2,4,6-Trichlorouhenol __ ' 9?-r-T--4 — -—-——2 , 4 ,5-Tric hi croc-hero 1___ . ?:; • •':.2- ~ - -------2-Chlcror,aphthalene_____ 33--'---———-——-2-NJ trcsr.iline___________ :.71--- ;--;--— ——— Dimethyl F•'- : 20E--6-P- -——-——3cen,= phthvlene_ 410 .T . .* 410 a 1 0 410 " !' I'O 410 410 .'•10 20':-:- -"-10 4 5 0 2000 4 1 0- 20-:--- 410 410 4 1 0 •L' -rn ;LJ •ilO !U 410 ;u 410 ;u ii-o :_ ••% ^ ,-j i ; • •'1C J 2 oo-: --10 j L ; 5 05 FCRM ! FV-3 Rev, TUT 00.1 0388 I 3FA LAr — '"• "! '-••' T -' _ — •— ~ V-i - r •- 4— r-.f. -:.: - r" I",? 3 X., -E2-" Nc. i ^y^T -". - .-,. H 1 •-.: - : t- / • ' i. J. ; Le-'t-:: ; low. /' :: r':::stu:-e: not. _~ 0.4 ' G ,' ML ; L21-; 20 de::. ._£.L E.-..r.pi£ ::::: c?o.i 07-33.. L5.C Fili? II: A12i^ Date Received: •:-&/13/g? ! ^Gp PC 21t:ar, Este Anil', zed: 06/30 / Dilution Factor: '.. . 0 C3--32 ?-—•-•————-ir.c c-r.if.hr. hen a. 100-02-" — — — — 132--£4-«= ————-Diber.zcl 121-14-2- "'003-72 -7————--•-•••?-Chlcrrjphe PI y I -pherv/ ie ther_ £6-73-7---——————FT uorrns__________________ 100 -10-6— - - - - --'•>-- M i t r c= a n i : i r, e.________._____ SA-3-:-6— --——-—.- K-NitrcisadiHhsnyi5.,v.:r,s (1)" : Cl-?'?-3-~- ———•-•/!--Frc-cphG-y] -phenyle-thG:^_ ••S;-.T:-______ 34-"- -2----------::i-,• •.-r_:Mvip":-,th,:.:Tt.r 12?-:"' "•-•"- ••--—————l- vrf;nc______________ lo-Tr •3--- ———-— P-rrc,^ )^nr.;- 213--01-9 ——-— — 2hry<=er-^______________ 1 17-GI--7-————-bis(2-EthyIhe^vi )Phtha] 117-C4-0---———---i-n-O-tyl Phthalate__ 205-9? -2-- - —— -—Per -c i b } F1 uz ran thene__ 207-08-9-—————-B^r.-^~. ( \-) Flagrant hers__ i'73 • Z'' -'••--•--- ----l:-,de;-.c : 1,1., ~- cd / Py--.--.-.t -3 .-;-,... 3.. ._..._............ rii.er.:: f ;. _ •.. ; A n t h r_ c .,,.. _ (1) - I.^.r.rvr-r. Lo= separatej f,-;^, Diphc:-ny 1 c i :oo -UO 3000 2000 410 410 3SO 410 1 f.'I- 2000 200'-: 410 .0. 1 0 -- - .^ — J- .' — -• .-, --, -_ ."-• -• 120 410 410 -'10 --10 - :. " --. — ,-. ...• -_• • . -110 410 200 410 :u 1 T iU i'J :u 410 A 10 ; L: 410 ID 4iO :L 410 :LJ ! TUT 001 0389 1/S7 Rev, i A "\ r-.«-»/».(. i T r^r-» ,-\ K i A i • / r» T r-« T~, A. -r r\ <™ i 'r .-1 "-. U M1N J. L~ -_w f-t I \ M l_ T O X wl- ^. ri i t-i _i t 1 EF'A bi-iMPLE MO ! b Name: CEflMIC CC Matri :; : i =rai 1 /water Sam p 1 e w t / vcl : Level : ( Icw/med ) 7. Moisture: not dec Column: (pack/cap) CAS NG. 1 : 74-E7-3 ————— i — f r f~i T- r-. . ! 75-00-3 ——— — I i ^- e *-» Q *-* I , / .: 09 .. 1 ! 67-64-1 ———— i -71= < c. f-» __ 1 : 75-35-4 ———— ! 75-34-3 ———— ! 67-66-3 —— — ! 107-06-2 - —— ! 7S-93-3 ———— 1 -T 1 ._ rr. "= .- ^. _. ' =6 ri~T ^ - I 108-05-4 —— - ! 75-27-4 — — - ! 7E-8/-5 ——— - ; 10061-01-5— i / T *-> 1. a ! 124-48-1 —— - I / .4. -r--' «. 1 i'.'VOJ. Ujl O ! 75-25-2 ——— - BY759 RP Contract: fcBDe'0023 Case No.: 12055 SA3 No.: 3DG No.: BT747 ) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 890107-12 5.O fa/mL> G Lab File ID: C0389 LOW Date Received: 06/08/59 12 Date A PACK Diluti nalyzed: 06/18/89 on Factor: 5.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG G ——— Chlorome thane Bromomethane ——— Vinyl Chlcride • ——— Chloroe thane • ——— Methyl ene Chloride • ——— Acetone ——— Carbon Disulfide • ——— 1 . 1-Dichloroethene • ——— 1 . 1-Dichloroethane • ——— 1 ,2-Dichloroethene ( total ) __ • ——— Chloroform - ——— 1 . 2-Dichlcroe thane - ——— 2-Bu.tanone - ——— 1 . 1 . l-Trichloroeth«ne • ——— Carbcn Tetrachloride ———— Vinyl Acetate ———— Brcmcdichlorome thane ———— 1 ,2-DichloroDroDane ———— cis-1 .3-Dichloroprcrene ———— Trichlorcethene ———— Dibromochloromethane ———— 1 . 1 .2-Trichloroethane ———— Benzene ———— Trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene _____ ——— Bromof orm - — ——— 4— Methvl — "2— Pentanone ! 591-78-6 ——————— 2-Hexanone I I 127-18-4 —— - | 1 79-34-5 ——— - i 4 AO CQ "*" ! 103-90-7 —— - 1 I « /-• f"t /• 4 /I i i '•-''..' *•:•..-. *.< > 1 TTf-- ".,-•. -T i JL •_> •_• •-• ^_ U . 1 1 1 ^~^ 1 ———— Tetrachloroethene ———— 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachlorcethane ___ ———— To 1 uene ———— Chlorobenzene ———— Ethyl benzene ———— Styrene ———— Total Xylenes i i 57 ! U es~^ t i i _• / i '.J 57 !U 57 !U — L 57 I^fC 250 IfSt/^T 28 !U 28 !U 28 !U 28 !U 28 !U 28 !U 57 !U 28 !U 28 ! U J 57 !U , 28 ! U f~* 28 !U 28 !U 28 !U 28 !U 28 !U 28 !U 28 1U 28 1U 57 !U 57 !U 28 !U 28 ', U 200 : ^ 28" !U 420 ! 28 • ! U 1400 \$& _i/j- 11 285 FORM I VOA ••'• "^~.-*'*-^i^ TUT 001 0390 <U3 ORGAN IC3 ANALYSIS DATA SHEET FFA SAMPLE tin BY 7 5 7 _.._..__________ Contract: 68._)9O.O_2_8 __ '. _ __'_____ Case Mo.: 12053__ SAS No.: ..______ 3DG No.: BT747 •5 C so i1/wa t e ri SOIL_ f ^i/vol: 3Q.7 (g/mL) G. : (1 ow/med) L ________ • t "ire : not de?c . •• ' i on : 1 oanups Lab Sample TD: Lab File ID: A i 2.7 8. Date Received: .15 dec. (SepF/Cont/Sonc ) (Y/N) N __ pM: 9.0 Date Extracted: i.»6_,__!.2_,_89. Datf? Analysed: (r)Z£ti Dilution Factor: 20O r.AS COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/l O -1.3-Dichlorobenzene -1, 4-D.ichlorobenzene_ -Benzyl Alcohol __ LO8-95--2———————F~-h«?nol______________ _ _____ 1 1.1-44-4———————bis ( 2-Ch 1 oraethy 1 ) E ther ~____ 75-57—8————————2—Chlorophenol _________ _____ 541-73-1——————- 106-46-7——————— 100-51-6———————- 75-5O-1————— "-ji^_/^g_-j___________ 3763B-32-9—————bis( 2-Chloroisopropy 1 )Ether. 1O6-44-5———————4-Me thy 1 phenol______________ 621-64-7———————N-Ni tr oso—Di—n-Propy 1 amine_ ('j 7-72-1—-——————He ::achloroe thane____________ r'8-95-3———————Nitrobenzene__________ ___ 78-59-1———— •1.2-Dichlorobenzene_ -2-Methy1pheno1 _____ IO5-67-9- 65-B5--O— I 1.1-91-1- 12O-H2-.1- 91-2O-3— VO6-47-Q- 87-68-3-- - T sophorone _________ -2—Ni trophenol ______ -2,4—DimethyIpheno1_ -E<enzoic Acid __ -bis( 2-Chloroetho>:y)Methane. -2,4-Dichlorophenol _________ -1,2.4—Triehiorobenzene -Naphtha1ene__________ 77-47-4——- nn~o<s-2—- 95-95-4—- VV-5B-7—- BH-74-4—- .131-11-3— 20H-96-8— /,OA- 70 2-- -4-Chloroani1ine________ -Hexachlorotautadiene _____ -4-ChIoro-3-Methy1pheno1 -2-Methv1 naphthalene____ ——He;:achlorocyc 1 a pen t ad i ene ——2.4,6-Trichlorophenol____ — -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol____ —-2~Chloronaphthalene_____ ——2-Ni troani1ine -Dimethvl Phthalate. -Acenaphthvlene_____ -2,6-Dinitrotoluene 9OO'.»..)'.» 7BOOO 78OOO 78 (JO'"' 780(.»O 7HOOO 78OOO 3200OO 78OOO 130OOOO 78OOO 7BOOO 78OO'"> 42OOO '80OOO 7BOOO 780OO 78OOO 770O 78OOC) 78OO'.' 78OOO 78OOO 780OO 3800OO 7ROOO 38OOOO 78OOO 7ROOO 78OOO :u 1 1 I t I .' !U : i j i i ;u !E :u :u :u MJ in : .j : u :u :u !U :,i :u :u :u :u :u :u :u :u : 11 :u :u FORM I SV-1 s-i I / / TUT OO1 O391 1/B7 \ ••••'-. IP, ::• "'...•; "::_E 2'-.CA."_[;Z AliAI.YSIE DATA 7HECT • i - -.- - •" T.' " '.•*•*• f~ — •- . r~.p. • '•"-••>'-. ' -. .:-___•_•__. • -- - •..- " I I L«.b C::^:: ^~.:HI_._ C-s ^ :!.;. trj;.: ; -D^ : /.—:- .ver "• 1DIL 2 A m pic; i-;*./\cl: 31 .2 (g/mL) L.a-vc? 1 •. (1 o w / r.ed ) L.CUI___ X Moisture: net dc-c . 15 dec. : Extraction: ( = z:pF /Ccnt/Sonc ) GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N__ pH: 9.0 __________ Contract: 6£D9'"i_02£ Nc.. : 12058 3AS Mo.: __ __ EFfi ?AMPLE"%3. BY759MS Me . : 5T747 I Lab E«mple ID: 990107-12X2 Lab File ID: ftl.279______ Date Received: 06/O8/S9 Bate Extracted: 06/12/39 Date Anslyred: 07/01/39 Dilution Factor: 210_____ CDN'CENTRATICN UNITS; :rs_c-r-..^_ ....._... —— rr-;-enol lliw.4-.4-- — —— • — bis(2-CThlcrcethvl JEthsr 9r.- T7-r-> ----- - ——— 2- Chl crasheno 1 54.1-73-1— —— - — 1,3-Dic hi ore benzene 10i,- ^6- 7 ——— • ——— 1 , 4-Dic hi e<ro benzene- 100-51-6- ——————— Benzyl A Ice hoi ~-5-f 0- •:. ————— - — -1. ,2-Bich lore benzene 95-46-7- ——————— z-i1e thy 1 phenol 39c.'3r-72-9~- — - — bis ( 2-Ch lore:. copra py ] ) Ether lOi— •i4--l5—— ————— -4-MsthvlDhenol 1 2 1 f: -1 ----- — - — M - r „' i. t r c = o - D i - n - F1 r c p y 1 a m i n e __ •::7-72-l ———— -- — He xachlorce thane <:-• c: _.c^...-._ —— ... ... ... ———— N , 4- f. _ ,. ., n .. _ n ^ 75-7-i-'- -;.----.----- — Isophor :?nc- .-.'-— r . -. -< .. i - i . ,_ _ % '..* L. .' . —— 1 M J. •_ , 1... P . i i t.' 1 i - — . J. j;: -._.,. -...o.. —— ._ —— 2,4-Di:v,et.hvlf;hent-l c-.S-'-F^-O- — — - —— Fenrc ic Acid l.:.l-?l-l-— — — — bis(2-Chlorcsthox> ) Methane __ : 20-87 - -- -——---. —2 , 4 -n ; c h 1 c re pheno 1 i2:i-f?2-.t —.- — — . -1,2. 4 -Trie hi crobenren*> '•'.-'I- :-•:----•------ — Naphtha] sne J-: ::-- • -"I ----- ----- -4-C.L-.l-::rca.nili-'e c" : - — t '.:'—_- — — — — — — — — n £, ;.; ^ _; H l c r c f. Li t a d i ci' n e ir .— > T- ,-* ~r n r-- L. T -^ ^y* x u •* ^ T r., ., r — — \ ivi l ( i i- 4. 1 1 77-47--1 -— — - —— --Hexrtc: hlorocye 1 open tsd iene _____ C8-0:--2- — —— • — -2,4,6-Trichlcrophenol ,-r- .r ••- ... f ._ . . . ..... _.- /•. c .-TJ. , cv, T c f_m^i.. .-^ „ 7 .... ,- _ -. ._ , _ _ (. J. 1. _ 1 ' ..•»_• >.. l_- ; i j i.. t i. • . ; cr i_; i I T_ i tir\ i tr r , uj1 -;-...- .'..-.. .........._... .. .. 2-Ni trcan i 1 ine :!.:'•-.' ' .' ----- - r-i.-e-vJiyl Phthal.v.ts .O; 'T-'":. r - •• •• - ••••- --Aner. -rhth vler.c- i •:/ -" ::-2- — •-• — -2,6-r'initrotoluene 7 E-O :>•:• — T r". .-. /•< -~x '_. •_•• l.' -' — * ,—. -•»/•- ••-, .' \_'Ot.' N. 7SOOO 7SOOO 73000 — rr-l - - - . C -.'*-'*.' 310000 73000 1300000 73000 "3000 7COOO — -\.-. .-. .-. • — . •.'».* 37000 -•W4-'1.'' -' — r c~. r~t t ~\ '-; •7 r:- i~i •'• r- .' vjlj >.'•-• 79 000 7300 •: 7 r? oO'i' 7 SO 00 - 7 sooo "8000 73000 73000 3COOOO 7 SOOO 3GCOOO 73000 — T,— ,-•> ,'-. .". . •_. '_' . . 73000 : I I I 1 i '_' 1 : J ! t i l 1 iU i i u : ;u i i iE :u i i . i i -. .- , • ' 'T , \j ;u :u :u :u , u !U 1 1 1 1 '-J i ' t :u : u ! '• 1 :u ; u •; 'j ;u : FCRil 1 SV-i 723 TUT OO1 O392 -.— i- .' v . T .— r-. ,- , . ,-M /,-- .— • ,- -r r, ,- , l-[——T ..-. - Mi i j..., i. ;-•. :-ii~i_ . .} .. .1' i..: . i-i ,:i"iZ-C. j ERA SAMPLE NO. •-•> k ' i-^ ••"••::••: CJ-JTriC rc^P Crntrpct: 1 :..;-. U C Lee: rE:KIC Case h.!o.: 12058 ' SAG No.: "ist,--:: :rc——,,^-; -,JL | Level ; •' l3i,/med } LOW '• Mcisturc: net dsc. 15 dec. : E:;trf..e-c:.an: (ScpF/Ccnt/Sonc) S3NC GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N __ pH: 9.0 CCNCEI. "•"1 -~- CCKPO'JIJD C.iy/L ' ' •*• - _ r~ cr — _ _ i-. i_ _ _ i 1 1 111--.4--4 ——— - — J-his(2-CM=rcethyi;=Ether | •' 95-57-2 ———————— 2-Chlorophencl ' •-•^-L •••••• -V- -l,3-Dn_hl*_,rob3n^sne ! 106- --A-7-- ——— • — 1,4-Dichlorcbenzene 1 : 100-51-6 —— — • — -Benzyl Alcohol 1 \^ i =5-50-1 —————— — 1.2-Dichlo;-cbsnzene : -5-4-8-7--- ————— 2-Methy}phenol 1 3'f-S- 72-9 - —— --bis(2-Chloroisoprcpyl )E + : -L-^—l^-s- —————— 4-Mothylphenol ; • •:.:!• 6-;-~ ——— • ——— N-Nitrcsc-Di-n-Propylamj ' -- • • — — ' ' *_ • c. '„ . i j. LJ i L_- *.; L. ft t\ HI & - .-.- • . i -- -- - -r-2. trote.-.ztr, if -• — . r: .— -; — L 1 J. ": '— ' i. j i i '_j j V-' i . C ——— ^, ——— ——— —— ' " I ) - t • J_ ' 1. 1 • -- -•' ^_ 1 i u w i '...' ,_ . .t- : ; ._ J. -"- - - -- • — * r i. j_ , 1 1 r. •_ i t r i. ,J i I *._ I t — x i C--5- 55- •:,----- —— -Pen zoic Acid SY759MSD fcB:)900::G ^?D3 No. : I5T747 Lab Sample ID: 890107-1 2MSD Lab File ID: A12SO Date Received: O6/OS/S9 Date Extracted: O6/12/G9 Data Analyzed: 07/01/89 Dilution Factor: 210 TF.ATIDN UNITE: -r u.g/Kg) L'£/> G H 1 TO 00 i LJ ! 7SOOO ! LJ : 78 coo ; ;j ! 73000 ! U ! 7EOOO ! U ! 73000 i U ! 73000 ! U ! 270000 ! :her ! 78000 !U : ii ooooo : .r.e ! 73000 1 'J ! . 78000 :U 73000 : Ll ; -'TOO'" i u : ""SO'r'O i '-J ! 35000 !J I 380000 : U i ill-^i-l ——————— t:is(2-Chlorcethcxy)Me-thane ___ ! 7SOOO !U 1 120- 83-2--—— —— 2,4-Dicnlorcshenol 1 78000 IU : :.-:•'.•--.-,. i — - — -l ,2,4 - ' ri^hloroben^E-ns !.— • « - • - — • • k I t l_ t •* - - - • rr* P- 1 i r i . .-.. j. t? : ! tz' , :•.'.-•:::-- - • •-(.-: — ------ — -'-^hiorcar.iline : "7-t E-7-- — - ——— Hexachlcrobutadiene : -:=..«..-;... ._......_._.. —— 4-Chlore-.i-Methyl phenol , 9? -:-7-£. —— ————— 2-!1eth-,'lnaphthaler.e "! — T —— '1 || 11 -1 • • • ! C2-Oc-2—— - ————— 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol • T.':_C --._.-...__. —— .._._2.4, 5-7--;.chlQi-ophe;-Dl . '- 5..;- ----- -- 7 Lh 1, c-.rcnc-iphtnalenf : - :- : - -- - -.:: - - - - - - -.. - 2-M.i t ro = n i 1 ir. s -•""I •::- _• -- - - -- -: ir^thvl p'-.tl-.alats- : 73000 : u : 7POOO i !.J i . 7SOCO I L: ! 78000 ! U i ' 73000 JL! ! 78000 ! U ie 1 "3000 !Li ! 78000 i Ll ! 330000 ! LJ ; 7 «ooo : '.i ! 730000 ' 'J -'SO 00 ' LJ . ;:?C--'-^- ^-- --------i-cai-.aphthylene ; 73000 i U ^^ : - - " 6 - r : -7.- - —— - —— -7,L-Dinitrot.Gluene ; -eooo : u i J 72 FORM 1 SV-1- TUT 001 O393 ! I \ 1 < *• , :- :*• 'v *— /\ K*I *-. i r* K 1 1— L V J.T. c. f- M cir-iilr- I_E. iJO. 'x ";?.;•:: '.DLATTLE ^rGANiCG :-\-\^,\ YSIS r.-ATA L- ;-=:F~ ! BY 760 •,,5; ~!~: ";T,:: rr?R~ Contract: iE-D9002B I ;.•..!&: :.ir::-:T- Ca-e Wo.: .12053 SAS Mo.: <^DG ,\'n . : BT747 : •=.-:-.: 1 -.,i-(t.erl EOIL LaD Sample ID: 890107-13 •~- •'••-••:-} i. 30.1 (a/mL) E Lab File ID: A1282 i ( low/msri) LOW . . . . • ' ' ' . Date Received: 0£/OS/B9 sturc;: ;--t cite. 16 dec. Date Extracted: 06/12/89 .ctic-n: ( SeDF/Car, t/Sonc ) SDMC Date Analyzed; 07/01/8*7 rieanup: (Y/N) N pH: S . 5 Dilution Factor: 10 r^ r~- 1 i *~- r~ \ • -»••-. A -r T r- L- O i -,' L. C. i ['•< i ~.r1 ( J. U i : .'.:?--[:- 2- —————— -Phenol ! : l ;.-•••',••; -4-— —— - — bis ( 2-Chloroethvl )Ethsr : '"',-!" 7-3- —— - ——— 2-C.Mcrr. phenol ; •=.<;•; --73-1 --- ——— -•-! , 3-Di.-h] 6rab*=r,-e-ne •' 306-46-7- — - —— — 1 ,.4-D.ichlorcbenzene ! iOO-'rl-i--- ————— Benzyl Alcohol , 95-^0-1- ——————— 1 ,2-Dichlorobenrene : v «=...- 3 _.v.. ...... —— „ — 2 --Methyl phenol : 39i33-3"-~ ————— -bis (2-Chloroi.EOpropyl )Tlhc;r _ , 10-/.-44-5 — — - ——— 4-Msthyl Phenol ! 621-.-i->-7 ————— - — M-NitrcsQ-Di-n-Prcr.vla.TO-G : 67-~"2-l--- — ——— He xachloroe thane c-_..._r-._ ,..__.._ — — -Mi trcbsnzene ' .•"•::• — *:• .-'- \ - — - — — — — — — i =cphorone . - :.-.- " r"- - ------ ~---,-r.NJ. trcpnenol I l ::r.-:ii7 ------- —— --2 , 4-L>imetny 1 phenol ! /-:-r-G":::-o-- — -- —— -Benroic: Acid i 111-91-i---- ————— bis ( 2-Ch lores the ;:y; Methane ; 12 :>- c-3-1 — ————— 2 , 4-Dichl orophenol i 120- "2-1- ———— — i . 2 , 4-Tric hi ore ; ben -ene 91 •-!"•"••:- 3- •——"—— ———Naphtha 1 ene 1 ; C 6-47- c---- —— — 4-Chloroani line i 07-6^-7- -• —————— Hexachlorobutadierie 1 =,^-SO-7 —————— : — 4-Chloro-3-Piethyl phenol ! 91- -z-7- -6 ———————— 2-Methy 1 naphtha 1 ene i 77-47-4- — ------- — -Heirac h 1 orocyc 1 open tad i ene : SS-O6-2-- ———— — 2: ,4 , 6-Tric hi ore phenol 1 95-9!?~4— ——————— 2,4,5-Trichlcrophenol ! 91-r^--- ----- ———— 2-Chloronaph thai ene ; 33-74-4 —— •••• ———— 2-N.i trcani 1 ine ! J31-l:i-3 — — - ——— Dimethyl Fhthalate , 20S-96-S--- — - —— Acenaphthvlene : 60t- 2 !•• 2 — -- — —— 2 , 6-Dir.i trotoluene ^ \ »•- 1 1 1 1 , 1 T T f- . iM LjN 1 i O L 3900 ! L1 3900 ! U 3900 I U 3900 ! U 3900 ! LI 3900 1 U 390O 1 U 390O I LI 3900 i U 3900 ! U 3900 : L! 3900 1 U 3^00 .' U 3900 i U 19000. !U 39OO ! U 39 00 ! U 3900 ! U 4100 ! 390O ! U 3900 ! U • 3900 I U 750 !J- 390O ! U 39OO ! U 19000 : u 3900 i U 19000 ! L) 3900 ! U 3900 ! 'J 3900 ! U ; " r FCRM I SV-1 ^ TUT 001 576 0394 LA ' '•• -;±,~:- ••'' '• rs ANALYSIS DATA SHEET F ::PA SAMPLE NC. •••»«: CF.II-irc C.'JUT Contract: 63D70O28 ••;-: cLiiur. rv<c=r. rin.: .12058 SAS MO.: SDG NO.: BT747 — -.- : ( ?--ii . 1 /w.H ••-.?(- ) 30 11. l,ab SaiTio.e ID: 390107-14 • fit/vol: 5.0 (u/ml.) G LabFilelD: CO337 : i low/m.pil) LOW... ...._._ Date Received: 0.6/1.2/37 •i-iirp; not dec. ..J 'f. Date Analysed: ('6/JB/_nv -t: (pack/cap) COCK . _ Dilution Factor: .l..J> ______ CONCENTRAT I ON ON I TS : '"fi" NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or uq/Kq) UJ3/KG Q * '1 O "T """*• i- - t i j_ L i R 7— . - — — .-- — — •-— ij •-,] or 'ome t hr~>nr? . T •!••«•: -'? -- — ----•---•• — — Bro mo met hane . ___ _ _ _ __ _ ", oi ..-/!-.-_ ....... — ..... . v j rty 1 Hh'l or idi3 •r) -O'i-3 - •--—-----( Mil oroethane ".... ..,,9-7.... ...... ,__._.._...Mpl t ;hvl(?ne Chloride A7-/)4-l ----- — - —— Acetone . 5 J 5 •(.)-• -- -Carbon Disulfide ^ri-35-4 — —— • —— -l.l-Dichloroethene 7^-34-3--. —————— 1. , i-Dichloroethane? "•40-59-0 — ----- - -t , 2-Dicfiloroethene ( total ) __ •'-> "' - h A - 3 - —— - - ———— Chloroform l''7 <>6 ,. - - I . 2-Dichloroethane 7Ft-'^3— ."•-— — — —— -—2— But an one - I --^5 -6 ----- •— - -- 1. , i . 1 - |~r i chloroethane tt,./,-2T.-r.i- — - ———— Carbon T'^trachloride 1 M«_O<;, -4 — - ——— - — Vinvl Acetate '•'"3-77-4-— ———— • — Bromod it: hi oromethane ___ _ _ /'"?- 87-^ •- — - — - — -i , 2--Dichloropropane 1 M/IA j -oi - -5- —— — ci«.-l . 3- Dirhloropropene _______ "?-o 1 _/0..._— ...._ — .._._ frich 1 oroethene 1 •;•• 4 .. /} 9 - j ..__._ ———— n i br omoc h 1 o r ome t ban e '7--no-ri- — _.—. —— j[ , j_ . 2 -Trichloroethane _______ • t -43-2— ——————— -Benzene I riO61 -U2-6 ——— — T ran s-l , 3-Dichloropropene ___ ' • 75 2 -•• - Fsromoform ) , ,:^_ ! ,-,_ i ——— . ——— 4-Methv 1 -2-Pen tanone v r? 1 — 78— 6— - — — — — 2— He::anone 1 .V - J f J 4 -- Fet.rachloroet.hene -.•^ '">-- ~ 1 . 1 , 2 . 2-1 etrachloroethane I "M-fl!]-3- —————— Toluene 1 1 >p-9o-7 —————— -Chlorobenrenp i 00-4 1 -4 ————— — -Ethvl benzene : 1 OO-42-5- —————— Stvrene? ! I •3"-2O-7- — - — — Total Xvlenes • 1 7 :M i :;.: : 1 1 t 2 1 1 J 26 ; n 14 IB fi !H 6 :u 6 ! U 6 i1 II 6 1 IJ 12 :u 6 : u 1.2 :u 6 1 I.) 6 ; o A ! U A ! |J ,'. :u 6 ;o A :u A : i ) 12 :u • 12 !IJ 6 : u A :u 6 :u A :u A !U 6 :u 6 !U 1 FORM I VGA TUT 001 0395 8t f:PA SAMPLE Ml*. "n!.,-ilT|.E ORGANIC':- ANALYSTS DATA SHEET i FN T AT r VLI ..\ i nr M T T r T ED rnnpnuNDS r.LU..!S_..r;.!'?6.f;L.____.._......._ __ Con trac t: 6C- IIM.f.C.. . C*se No.: l.:J050 SAS No.: OY7/-.1 SDG Mo.: 8T747_ : r - / » i l /ua l-p>r ! SnTL "i>. /veil: ......._?_...<: ( low/«i»?d ) LpW__ : • ,1 .- f nre : riot: dec . J.J} • I • • mr i I par k /cap) r:'A_CL_ ..ni-.or ! ICs fr-un. Lab Sample ID: O7Ol'i/ -J4_ ''I/ml ) G _. Lab File ID: CO3!37j _____ Date Received: 'J6_/,l2/a9. Date Analysed: '-).4 Dilution Factor: 1 ..._O CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or uq/Kg) UG/JKjG SMDFR >O«.)O ")i")(")O »")OO COMPOUND NAME Unknown Unknown Unknown RT F3 . 02 29.44 31.79 i- ST. cone. n. i 1AO 38 Q DJ BJ BJ FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Pr.v. TUT 001 0396 L-:PA SAMPLE :;!.;. r|{ ;;v%c CCRP BY761 r i c . : Mo.: V-JT747 L_eve ; : re.;. •./—-. re r) 1CIL 31.-1 ;. g/mL) E_ ) LCW 22 dec. _ L»£ Sample ID: £,90107-1.4 Lab File ID: .• •../ C -1.., £f \- . ^_ ....'. ;Sepr/Cont/5cjr.c) SONG 3FG<Cl5an,.;p: (Y/N) N__ pH: 9- . 0 Date Received: . 06/O3/39 Date Extracted: '''6/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/30/89 Dilution Factcr: 2. 1____ ,-» r-\ ». t r- I — » : T- f~: *•.-«- T '-ii, '. < i i . ' T T" *~ _ ^j 1 M U l_ i '•'. i !". r-i i i v-i i •« •_• ! - J. 1 .:.".• . / ... , » . . ... .- i . ._ -. i tr" - . - - , — i. ....... t... ... . • '. .• f-'.-i ' • ••" ' r ~ •'.%:;;:: -.-00-02-7- 4 -T •—. _ f_ .- _ ^J __ - -— -* - .1 '~, .:. *:.. .i- _•- *r j_ 34 •-.:••. 6-2— r?/___"7~*_-7 ._ ._• '_.-• .• _ lOO-^O-.i-- ^.^ 4 --•=.-• i- «• •* c: cr _ -r _ •: . f, —— : t ._ -. W ' " . *1 " _• " •-J1 — ,— j _ ; _ l!Sl:£ 20i--->4 -0- 1 29-f"' "' -;"'•- S5--63-7 — - < _ c: ," ... i _ . cz / f= r ^' \.j -..' •.-• -" _• — 213-Ol-=- 117-S1--7- 117-84-0- 205-9 9--2- 207-0.3--- - 1 — — -T r . = ._ - r~. ^ '-. .- ^- ----- — -3-Nitrcani.l ine — — — — — — — M c e n 3. p h t n e n e ----- — -2 , 4-Dini trophenal ——— - — 4-Uitrophenol — — ._- — Dibenzof uran -.._ —— — 2 , 4-Dini tro toluene —— ------Diet hy 1 p h t ha late .__. ———— 4-Ch 1 crophsny 1 -pheny j e- th^r _._._..— —— _p i LiQ|-ene _ — — •-- ~ .q -- N i t r c a r. i 1 i n e ------- -4, 6- D in itrc-2-Ksthv 1 phenol ------ --M-Ni troEOdi phenv] a.~i re (' 1 } — --- — ~ 4 -E r C..TO p hen v 1 -p he T: •. • 1 c; t h-s r ------- -!-ie;-'acMc;robfvnz era - _. - „ _. ... _ p e p -W- ,- ,- j.- 1 0 | - o p h; e n Q | — — — — — P hen ^.n t h rene ——— - —— Anthracene -- ————— Di-n-Butylphthalate ...... ——— -FluGran thene - ——— — -Pvrene —— .._. — -Butyl ben zylph thai ate -•- ——— -3 , 3 ' -Dichlorcbenzidi.- - ----- ———— Benzc ( a ) Anthracene — ... ——— C h r v c e n e • —————— bis(2-Ethylhexyl jPhthalate _._.. ———— D i _n _0c ty i ph t ha 1 a t e ._._ — —— Benzo ( b } Fluor en thene — • ———— Benzo ( k ) Fluoran thene ----- —— -Ben no ( a ) Py rene • —————— I ndeno (1,2, 3-cd ) Py rene -- — - — — Dibenz ( a , h ) Anthracene • —————— Ppr.zc ( q , h, i ) Pery lens 41OO ! LJ T50 iJ 4100 IIJ 4100 1U 350 ! LJ 850 :L! 350 ! LJ E50 !U 550 :u 4100 '.'..'> 4ioo ;u 550 !U £5-0 : U sr.o i! ! 410O ;U S5O : LJ 350 ID 350 ', U 850 !LI S50 ilJ 120 !J ITOO :u' 350 !U 350 IL' 350 ; U 850 !U S50' ; LJ 850 !U 850 ILJ 850 ID 850 •' '.J 350 I U : -- / ..:r <= e para ted . from Dipheny lamine FORM 1 SV-2 606 TUT 001 0397 00 1 1 • 1 -H '"':i -j- i c ! a 1 Q i ' '• ' . •' ' ".' -IV ., .: i' -1.1 ' i '•'•' LO ' 1 1 ! ! ! M . rr- 'Ti 1 1 r-i -,i !-" Tl -> '.r '- rt •-» r -j ...-; n ,•-• 't •••; r> 3 •- -• :Tj f- '.'•• Ill •- 1 •, ! -J --1 •.:• 0 r~ i - I, 3 3 - • - Li! 1 •-' u.l 1 - 1 1 I . ' . ' -.. • J i 1 I i ' ! i i ii ; : n H '.; .1! i- rt rt T -; < 1! :i -r: ,-,. ," t -• ff. ,,. IT :i G! m I.J rt-ri 1- ) 03 • .1 o •••• o f.: c: o •;!.; ; M -,- : i -. .;•- ! 1 ! ! i! : i i ;' A " ; • . "- -' • f f! "1 - J [1 -1 iii n "D "T -' >-• rt G ir -, rn a »-•• n |Ti :r (D in0 !-* •i ! co o 5 r " i " y -.j 0 -,' i : v- 4- f- -,j i : ' 1 ..-. i 1 ! ! i ! j \$ '' '.',< r^ n i :r -i ^ -i C .... -,. n o :r r: -- < o n o q" fr ni m n 2 ''• 0 !!J r-- a H- it! ~1 .^ '1-1 U -1 -J 0 0 r: c: •0 V •'- • • r i 1 :• ; : ! i ! ! ! t i r ir/ rtlr -i a". Tlrr :r pi1... rti r 1 1 b IT' !"1 t ' .'1 1 ' K* '- ' 0 -1 : ;. >- M }..i i- • 1 r- -.;. '" i • . ", ! I . : . M ' ! .;. n . . >. • ro M. j ! ' i ; M i 1 ' 1 . 1 . J 1 ; : I ' M ^ ' i • • i i ' : 1 •• . ! i , i : ; i ; i • ' ' • i ; ! ' i ' i i • ! : • i i 1 ! i : i i 1 i '• 1 f- rr. •<-. ..: ' • i .1 - I 'Ti i •'.• •• •• i- i'l > : JT: M -^ !li :r HI .r ir . , -. i-. rr i -• ,-h js r? M n !'• r; T i :-•• i -'i » • -; : H ri ; i i'j M :•, * ' - :r .r l -. :-: in !-•• •--• -,-• Cl ri :; ;: i : n \ • ! rr i- i; - -| :i r' •'- >- n ij !Ti ri I 0 -I i ;-| rt P :.i -i :r ,r ir t: in t; fu T < >- rr n n H- nj ITJ D :..: n :i 1; >-• •< rr P ,-i r.i pi :.r D rri r^ :}i 'i in •in il-J ' i U '-I '.-I U • i -J ' -1 • • ! • ' ' • i - J -.! 0 <:< .;. -.;• :.-. •::• o c: f. r:'x: r. c •,: ( '-- !-• 'i.; j 0 i'.- " ; ' • 1 ' -• •:• ••' \ \'-\ a -.| i j .;... -.1 ; 1 1 i i i i i-» i> r; n ; .1 r, -j i i ! ; . ' , .!-, | .-... . • ! • • . ! i - , • I ; :;; : : -o r n M ; ; : i i . ; 1 i i i i ? ! ' ! ' i ! i I I I 1 i i ! ! i l ! : i i 1 ! 1 ' i i ! ! i l ! ! i i ••i t .; i i . i :-: x .". 4-. 'T i |V ., 1 M. .... |TJ i | ^. r.i .;, ; : ji rt :; ;.:: :< in • M | I • ij "I Ol !- - IT! .--. ) Ci i.;l r: J M n ri- rr tj , ' - i- -i i ; i r :r "i IT i '. n -'! n • n •— • u x" ('1 •- D TI ij ii 1.1 in > • :r » n rr m in ;;i i i ;r o : i-- •- • : i : ; n u :-. ^ ,- r.i > , n , i- s =• rj a r -, , . -r i r-j ,... (_ ;.r M .1 ,- in , n :i i o i.i m ;i n f! "' -i r? 0 ri n •—i Ti a m !' rt r.i rr * m -j i 'l i-i i ! . J • 1 ,.l •.-! .,J '.J . :;• J ! j - ! 1 - 1 -J -.1 - o o • •..:• • • o o o o ' :- L: r.: .; r: c; c c c; t ' ' i'l 0 »-' ' !- rn -0 h- -• n f.n ..%....• ^:, .n . . -. ! : o r> i- . ' ; L •• ;i '• T. i | m 1 :•:• o ..i >•• -. -.1 . n i r i-- •: i -i i ; .. '.r- j '•• . ; n ; ; i i> I-' 1 - •:. M ' ' i ! l 1 1 | i ; i ! j i i - its' - •• l" i : :r T Hi :i 4s L,I n 1:1 HI J ! N ; i rr -•- '; r ^ - : f J 1 ! t • r j Q r i . i.^ p. ..... r: r- : n ii n T n -• ir j-.- r.r :,- ci _r r d n n u ;r r'i i -, n -i -, o •; i r.i rr n r; M u i ^r o rr r- f.\ ;•! - m (.. ni iji i- , ;- n ii :i ri r-i M "I HI m i • r.i ii "i m ru iii n IT' -.r ;'; -'i •J '1 U '-J M ' ' ' . ! ' ' J -J - | -,| -.j - 1 • | -J -• 0 O •:> 0 0 .•;•• •,•• : c: c: c. L; r: i... u - • r.; m :, r" !."• .: \" , i? ;• it; M' iJi r'rf n rt- ;; •;. ? ,; i x - n IT; Ti -; f 1 ':> \- >-. i • ; . .1 t • j j l^i •,. |1i - : ni ,1 i- : M ! 1 C: !'• [. ' !'! 1 1 I . I - i , ; . . . , in '" :i ri •. • - - • L :• ' -:-. ., ... -i ... |- | 1 Ii ' . -.. . l. -: ri ;.. - T ri -- " ! ' _ " -'-: K < ?• r'i j Ti r.. n. r: V! ' ' i n v.- ; ) n r Ci 1 \- ;•: "- I' i.i - ' - I -'1 i:! ri- r • .v: o -< U 11 --. lt,1 • f- • i m i ' "0 t: n i.: ri !~1 It 71 Or -' ?; in n r • : . - .. = .. - n 1 Ii0 !-' feh i --. n !.-• £ 9 ••- ri . ; !" m ,;i H o t; i.; r.; r r -; ;TI K.. rn r- HI n, ,,: T;. >•-' ri- -•' rt M CT -: --! c ID iti in i| i t H rt- '] : '1 -.. r.i •-•- i-. n -T '•• •;,. V". 2! 0 •_-, • IT: >--' =• ni 11 !5i rt • n fO C! - - c t- ~. m -••: ~si •< :'' t- •-- rn i" n !ii M n .-; ".i n --i n m rt Q •- > < M .11 rt u. n LX .':.1 :• 1 ~ •' 0 ., ci .. •- !.r.i - T ••• ' •:;• ~ ;•• ••" -' t, ;> . j - n, r... .0 : J -.;• O f.l Ci •-•'• m r- '?: "-: > ' ';i .: ••b -0 -o i i 1 : ; j.i r- !: -> L~ r-i • t •; •-- -: ' .: ; j :"! r r ': - - ! .J ; .• ; • 1 • - " . , - -•i 1 r i 1 " i 1 (; ' 1 •: t ^ i : i >- 'i " : f - ' ' 1 !-: : I i..} • i ol , -! ; ! M ... - . ... : .! -:: -r? -J 1 • n —r ? D LU j; •~L Ul» in <i c > i- i't • I i ... _ ^ _ . ( LU r •6 i> i - t ; i .J IU i.; -j .":i .', " A> •:L U ! - ij ... ^. : ; 4-' ;• L i IJ i . L.! L j i ,. r -— (••' LJ 1 C.' LJ i *l "i <r£ L'.' r :' • i J ..: u_ r < L - i '. • 1 ' 1 i , r. J 1 -. " i i: : i 1 -' : ;. J. ..<l 'r '.: L ' _ Cj c-i i-- (-' Cr- Cr- i> ! O.I LTJ N. r- lij O If; C-,1 tO o i-' i> ,-i <: -rj jj C.i •:! r. Ci - " T3 M f-i u ai ;..; i i -- Ui 4-> Q > U Lj rH - i - i i.i r-i Jil !_ ii. iu u 4' !• rH 11! X is -ri c: LLJ Ll I 1 . Il 111 ii j~l 4J 4-J •! 'ti '•(' *U J L.I (..i . •. ; ~ T L- j i-;_ i T ; L'J c; •:: _i u t < Ir ii! U !T> . •_- ' c- 1- v-i _J . f-4 U ' f O 3 ' vn !i cj ro a .J t! .J i i !. '- IJ i'.! n in 4- ! a 13 IV •;.: i~ - -. li --. 4' •: - . • • 3 i i .-, -H ,-H o i: L. - 1 U -.1 i. .1 !> i.il • , U 4-J L l\i -' "j ~'! ••' . -. . )J :_. ••: ^ •-'-< ^ LL & U , o t! :| £ }: /.!.' .1 n .1 :: r.t CO V C ;-J .'1 .^.. "n OJ ti ..." 1— t •ci; '"i Ul 4-1 '0 C'j LJZ C to *-*.uc0 (J! V N 4Jrc r i v L. a. a: LO "•• • •c: i • i 1 1 !,_ 4-' *' UJ c; •o rH h* L. L_: ij "-.•. 4J 0! -•-. U I-- L'i Hi *-( - ' u. :* — • -^ - C I.!' U 7. ii •H C.i v- i-' rH !.|i '."i \" • r-i <!. ••4. LC i-. i'i i •• 1"! Z:I 1 1 i j LJ -•'- ;-: u> CJ -! L J ^ • f 4. CJ .. Xii n "^ — iD a.i:u CJ •-» X - - I'l •-. . -_. 0 •** * , IL U C!'.. L! tr iD '.- r-t LJ (Jli. UJ ID i'j D D :j D D n «-.i 13 :i n O O •'.• O O O C O •'.:< O O O o r- •;• o r- r-- i - r • to o o r • -a i; LJ co r\- t' r-i n to to co n ,-i H -I 'H f ! i_ rH ^-- iu a in '"" &- ^_- 4- 1 p] LJ Jl fH -H a C > ri •••! c :>- G m :n r ai rH C H 4J r-H O U! 01 LL ii) ,>- i: :j 4J j; c IU ij) rH 111 r-H |JJ | Ql t: c -i u rn ;x c n -i: ••\ m a a c •*-' «J c -H i LI r-< IT 0 C IT) O JI 111 'H O '4 .-i li! L 01 L L 4-1 IT -r< L. n L. ^ 4-* n n 4-' j^ a i; 4J o it 4' -H n •<- -i CL o iu '& H ui o .1.: C O Q C - « L C O C U L a -H L ri -H > U UI i- -H L 4- IL O 4-1 C LJ j: r< L 4-' a 4J •H c i •-'. iu p x: o 'H i ••-* z a.' «r z 13 «:r ai u 3 z -o z I !J ». 1 .H •• 'H rH I ,. | to '-a M «r P rj o «? L- * <r z i ! i ! Ill i i • i i iii l i l t i i i 1 i ! 1 III i i : i 1 1 1 i i i i iii ! i i i I i ill i l l ! n i i i , i ! r- o- f-\ i <s .4. i i ; :: • u'j i i i -:--\ n i-v < i ^j ! '( 1 ^\ ',!' '-? h- ! O IN j_ c -'' ; -i 'i ' : <; LI-J r-- : LI !-• i ; i o o '-i o •::• ^ i n- r; ^ o M ci rf .-. ,Q .;.-. [-. -o u- i.'.;i D -i .1 -H to r-- u -•< u"j 03 ( ^' -• - "1 '- -[ | -. -T —— 1 --, —— I —— , 'I --, —— * .... —— 1 —— , —— 1 _j - • -.! J — 1 - ' _J _J .J -J _ 1 — I r J - J _ . — I o c/ •?' o o o o o •;•••'..• o o o o o o i - i - o ••.-• i - i - r- i - N m r- r- m r- r- r- r-'.i •';• LU ci to to r-i i j r. r- i-:. ro r:i t-:< to . i ui !_ 4J li id J"_ rH 4-> li! 1C Q t: .c r-i Ui -H 4J 111 111 lli > ai 4J n j; 4J c L: |- ^-' rj - i |JJ u. iTi Pj ill CJ UJ rH iii rH tS |~ .- - rH J~ J^ .C l-' 0 r-l i5 t~ IU 'H Hi 4J 4J l i. HI r i-j j; U u > J: c C i ii nj jc w n '.(, :••: 4J it ui ri i: i: 4-< j~ t.! !.. ui r i. u. > in ij. ai x: oj a. L j; .c a. o o [.: -J! ij C L'i C rH 1.1 +i r-l ^ ^ U; 1.1 L l[! CU rH i!| >. rH j~ >. rH rH rH j: L. i/j L L >- jc r-i a; <f r >. LL u.. a o ^ i; ,j 4- 4^ c LI •••> (n 4-» 4-1 --x '-- U rH i; iJ ij ii c UJ -i '6 L: IU U J3 -^ <-- sr. u r: .T; PJ n GJ rj rj - ai o — ~ 0 U t ID !- ! L C rH | o UI f 1 1 0 U L. rrj jj c a" t: D iii >• - N > ^ c N >•> iii - r; u -P i j L 4-' to i: L m c r: 1 li! iU 1- C '--I r-l >- J '- (11 j- H -ri |]J Iii -t X Li. LL C Ci LL LL I'ii t-'! t'U U J'J P |Ti CTi ! 1 1 i i 1 1 i i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 i I 1 ! i ! 1 II 1 i 1 i 1 1 ! ! 1 1 1 II 1 ! 1 : 1 i i i i ! 1 II 1 ! 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 i 1 II 1 i 1 I ! 1 1 I ! i i 1 ! 1 l i ! i 1 ! 1 1 1 ! i i 1 ! 1 i 1 1 i ! 1 ! i ! 1 1 II |--'i - H . i f -. \ •"•• O ! : I D - - f-. O f-l Cr i i ii. LO : r ••! i i r-- --i o i i i i i IJ "i v! i I IN ' ••; O 1 . 1 T-I ,-i -H; t. ,;:-. ui {•- vj --i r-1 '•• '• •.;- •':. ••; u; •.:• I'D CO cr- •':• i i £0 •...'• i 1 ! -U Li ifi i ! l -•i i.! : o • -o i> i i i C'j r- r- L-i r-. o '•! r- Lfj u •=• •:.•• ci L. '••! •-, T-I ,.< ,-< o •-• T-i i -i Ci i':i ,4 LO (i *•! 0; !j ••; IN •< i • -i IN f'-J IJ n -j 13 . \ l"l !' -. O f- r r:- N i'.i (•> i :• r"! ui ~ iii ill U LU '•.- !ii r: > U 0! LL ifj '-i •— L >- •u j: L ai u 4J in C 1 C LL ijj to <r --- L '• -^ -H >- C ) J7 '• LL • •'•!: -•^ ' 1 \\i '• iQ *' --•- O' -' 0 i-J — o c r. o N 111 01 N c u JJ c iii L: -H iii UC >"i l"; ll'i I I I ! ! i i 1 : ! i i i ! 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 ! I 1 : i - 1 1 i i ! I U' i IN r-° ,.' ,': : IN r"-.i •;, f.;i i "' 1 i- ! i f- '! ; | .7. c- r . o- li 1 ' \ Ui. 'H 6 r^ CO X T-i -rH ,-^; O i —b UJc •H i- 'r i Tj J r ' ~,,' >. If; L" 111 rH ra E •'4 |X Cl 0 Li- e 0L •)- T! U 4-' "jL iiia U! I'l !!l ^ \ 4J 0 :"i: i5rj i .— . '••i \) I IB TLC -F.GANICE AN SAMPLE 1 1 1 1 j i •> I I I i < i 1 1 . " i'j * .,:'.'~if=: : CE I I i BY769 r-'IC C2F:F' Contract: 6SD°002S I : .. I., i—- .1 _ r" r~ T K>* T f - •— « _ _ _ K 1 _ '»-.*•* e r~i f ^ r~> 1 1 _ - r" f, /-* I t L...C-I... . . Je: •. .:j..:.it_ L^tiiEe MO. 1 j »:..•? c:: c-.-fo ijfj. I -TIJO No. r I./I .. J. .._ J - r ^ .'...... - 1 i , r,\ •_ r — . ; : • i; L_ j. i ,- t:ufi.~ j t= ;>.' t ,: vo 1 /v-^tcr: SOIL . L;.t: Sample ID: :::^0 : -0.3 (a/JiL) G Lib File ID: A12 Lsvti : ( law /med ) LOW Date Received: 06/ 7. Moisture: n EN" t ruction : 3FC Cleanup: <- ^. r^ no •._ r". ^.* i '^ — f . ,— t—. C= 1 _ 1. ' -t -1 •7 en . ... r- -T ._ t; .« < —— !• i •* .-• / i / i 0?" 5r") — v ^ • O "^ * r^ ! 3963E- J 106-44 ; 62i--b4 • /. -T -T ^ i r-\ •-% /— , r -* cr _. ^ -T- _ p ^ _"-.. i / r- r-. rr . i:- ^.-- • t_ _» ~~ i •• ~.--- p-r * 4 '•T ,-^ __ •"? J" t •' .", -• .' •"! -L .-*--• " *- ' ! 1^ 1 -.-• -' : ', .1 --5.'- ! ,7-4/~ ^- U- - ^_ ; c: 1 . f-.: • ; 20'?---?> ; oO6-2C Dt dec. 17 dec. Date? Extracted: CA/ (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SDNC D^.tc f- iv/N) N PH: 0.8 Diluti nalvzeri: 06/ _—. r~ - — A- — ,- - •< Oil f'Cli-L.' 1 • — . CCNCENTRAT I CN LJ !^ I TS ; COMPOUND (UG/L cr uc /Kc } UG/KG -2- ———— - — Phenol n v _ 4 - _ / ' ^ f^ »•- ^ ^ .^. — _ 4 - u - i l * ' — 4-1- _ ... 1- "IS ( i.— Li i - iji ije t: iV 1 .' !-_ _! itrf c--- — - ——— 2-Chlorcpher,ol --1 — — •— —— i , 3-Dichloro benzene -7- — - — —— i , 4-Dich lorobenzer.e -A ——————— Benrvl Alcohol 1- ——————— 1 , 2-Dichlorofcenzerie 7 ———— — — 2 -Methyl phenol 32-9 ————— bis(2-Chloroiscprv_pyl ) Ether _ -1:. ——————— 4-Me thy 1 cheno 1 - -N-NitruSC-Di-n-Proi-jylafnints 1 Hexachloroeth^.ne 3 — ——— —— Nitrobenzene 1 —— —— - — Isophorsne = _..._._. — — -2-Ni trophenci -^ — —— —— 2 , 4-DjLf.-.e thy 1 phena 1 ;;._..._. _. —— — Eenzoic Acid -. —— - ——— bis(2-Chloroetho:,-y)Methane __ -2 ——————— 2,4-Dichlorophenol '- i ——— - ——— i ,2, 4-Trichlorobenzerie --...__.__ —— Naphthalene •-3- — .. —— -4-Chlorco.niline ...... ...... —— — HexachlcrobutCidiene •7 <--Chloro-o— hethy Ichenc 1 _ . ———— . ——— 2-Me t. hy 1 n a p h t ha 1 en e -4 Hexachlorocycl open tad iene ___ __. —— ..._ —— 2 ,4,6- . richli_»rophei.t_il 4 ———————— 2,4,5-Trichlc.rc.pherol ~-- —— — — 2-Chlcronephthalene .^ ......_ —— -----2-Ni troani 1 ine -7 — - ————— Dimethyl Phthalate >-3--- ——— -Acenaphthvlene •-2- — •- ——— 2, 6-Dinitro toluene 400 .a 00 •=•00 -'.DO 400 400 40O 40O 400 40 O 4 CO 400 4OO 40!;; -T '_ O 1900 400 400 400 1£OO 4CO 40O 400 1500 400 400 190O 4OO 1900 400 40O 400 pyr.-r-j 4 ,"-. -r —• —T .i _-• .- ' -_ ..' 56 12/G9 13/B9 29/89 0 .—. •_-. i i • i . i i i i '— ' ."J !U :u .. ;LJu ;u ;U ; u ::j i i i : -_J i i i . J i j i ij ;u ;u i ;u !U :u : j :u ,'U :u !L! !U !U 1 r _ FORM I SV-1 TUT 001 0400 ( r - "" 1 f '; 0: ~i-• (i i-r rr •• li'i (!! TJ T rr Hia .(, ~ f.: •-i i.J 13 TJ J-- T.T Xi-p *- •* rrj3 f.O < ,-- ^ ! Oi rj =' (.,. rr; -H CH 0 O H- o 1 ' 4> x 0 CD H- Ois / r- ' 1 | • ' P I j M] ?.J ,o O O '- I \A i 1 i • j 1 ,-,i ; r) ";• i i t.l O .*> ' v"! : ill 1 ' '< I n ! ' r ) ' - i -0 i i i ! i i ! ! t | ! l i i i l ! • ! i ! ! ! 1 : i ! i ! I ! 1 1 :ji ri -,.t rrt rp iTi i :- 3 rn ro 3 rr a 3 3 1-4 ,"> 12 N t-J o :' 3 r.i a „,. M O .~, ^ in ••"• ••••-• 91 T* •, •".; (.j. -..,• .... T - - -I.-! Tl •* :.r t,-!-,: •-• !-• - ' '•• "1 C -•• J> i J fil 11 TJ 3 ; M -i m rr i"! rti QJ •1 rr C. 3 < "i - - rt r- 9l Tl T ITJ n x- fj| 3 fil - 3 m 3 in ITJ !Tj 3 Ji |i J-. Ja .0 6 o o o 6 ; : c: c: r: c H v- K» r.) rn o CO r-' rO M H' CO r:i • '- CO rji N| ^J 01 i ! '! '-3 Q* i '-1 ! ' fO >"* 1 ! 1 1 ! '.n ..'i ir- ! ! -.; i O '•> 1 i >:-J o ro rj.1 o f.'i -i. M ••:• •?> j. " ••- .'-• -i 'i •-> -0 .fi n !-> i i i •;:• •'' i f J i -, rn i i r : :••! r- -j i i f.;i : ro '. n ; 0-- f-,1 O ' i 0 ' I i O O ! -J i i :• U ! i 1 i 1 1 1 ! : 1 ! i ' I 1 ! i ! i I i 1 I ! i ! i i i ! i 1 1 i ! i ! 1 1 ! 1 ! i 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 ! i 1 1 i 1 i ' ! 1 ! ' 1 I i I 1 1 ! 1 I 1 i ! 1 ! ! ! I ! ! ! 1 1 1 1 i : ! ! 1 i 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! 1 i ! 1 1 ! ! i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 ! 1 ?i.' ri rr n m t..-i w TJ TI u '& TI -11 T; & z n 1— I-1- "T ITi •- r ••*." >••• (••• 3 T Ti iTi i 1 3 T> T 3 i | rr -i r-l ; rr rr, 3 :, rri •?_ N 3 ••-• -.-• !•'• • ••:.' ITi f! 3 3" 3 it 51 -i h- n M in n i !-• 3 i ! ". {!•• i' n n ri- •- O 1 rti --• i.J rr rti »• :.TI U1 3 r: ir '< - cr n m 3 rn >- TI 3 c n rr rr >-• n o ~ rt tt m -' n 3 rt rr rri .T >•••• f! TJ Ul TI -; 3 j> -j r i ir >< 3 - rj -^ :j o >-J (-• -< 3 --••->•' Itl i-- ITJ fii "i Ci l7l Ci. r n r+ n •-• 3 Tl 3 0 rr 3 (•'• 0 TI ;r 3- -; T:I rri -- rr: TT m •< ~a T 3" rri ~i n :r rr :r 3 •• -_r ai rr •< 9> Q" n zr- ni N ' in n 3- -< n in -j- PI 3 m n 3 rt PI '-j rfi 3 B.I >•- 0 3 ir •<:. 3" •-• -•' -' 1-4 ( •' 3' >-• Hi ?S i--1 p| pj "11 (Jl (.1 £i ,-(- 3 111 3 ^ 3 " U rt rp, < 3 m rti rt i •• rn *•• I-'- T 3 r t i 3 * I'i rt (T) »-• ;r 5.1 rn ^-. rt -i M m h» ji ^ r> .;> is rn :* ^ '-•> ^ 4> 4^ -n ;. ;•> .r-, o o o •;:• o • :• • > o •:"• o w •:;• ••> •::• •::• o o o o o o o o o •.:• o o o o o o o r: c: c. r: r... c: c c.: c r: c: c: c: c: r: c: rn I-- i.-J 0 \ "'' r j o i i i ••'• o-- ! 1 i j i i 1 ! i i i i ! 1 4* -i* '* \ O 7. ! i- O rr p. -T P 0 u*. ni rt 3 •1 h- O !-• 1 K- tJ 3 i m -i mrtrr •>< >••• Tl 3' III3 0 h' M •o -n o •":• :: r: / V 01 -j ro M i-1 h' r.n c,i o c- o -£•> n i.-J o >•» i.J o O l-' t-.l O 1 j ! J rn !> i ! 1 M i- ' • 1 i rr- .* 0-. .-;, rn f ) .;-i i •-. l -i.i J^ :-.i i i i -•J W -11 : i < n -.1;; r j i 1 t 1 -0 --J ' 1 i ! f.-i : i i i i i i 1 ! I 1 i 1 i 1 ! 1 i I l 1 1 ! 1 1 1 I ! ! ! i ! 1 1 1 ! ! ! 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 ! 1 1 i 1 i I 1 1 1 Tl .'-. r;5 i\ r_1 4^ t-.l 1> •..) f_ | H. ., H- | - n 1 c n m j» rr ~t ^ :r. i;. 0 3" rr i rti v,. i 3 p. -i >•-• T rj :i ,t O Hi ri IT! 0 •< i-" M 1 !J-T1 -'i 3 -i >--• 3 n o 3 :r o (T) Q Tl |-j. -J, -j-j H- ,-f. 31 Ti 3" rr r_ -j rr 3- 1' 3" rt 1 :'!i fn ", itl '-•• rn 3" 0 O.i 3 D 3 i-' 3 fit ,-t 3 C.I TJ ITI !-" *«•'- ^-^ o i. • ~ r "1 -., l_t r' _ ' — ' i-j BI !••• rri rrj 1 rt r 3 T3 <0 IE O 3 - 3 • - - ITI iTi 3 x^ t-^ rnrr:r m h* t- ; • ' >' J> Ji .{i .h ,/j -n 1., -..'I .•i '...• •,.• • ,• v. 1 i. .• •„• '.;• '..,' ._• O O O O O O •'"• O •-- c: c: c.! f. c L: c: r: ro n n rti ;].• 3 i ^ c TJ ; T •• i ii -•*..<v 2! ^- s* no Tl -3j; -..- T ij TJ X •• £ — 11 " CT *n ^r • - n r m n H r-,i 1 T> H- H^ *~* r H c u'i »~i rt --.. n H T T: a Ul 3 -- c: ' '* Ti 1 " i'H "l i'-i' H n --. rn rt -- .. a ITi ~i *• *•* C1 rj m ;-.: ! r.j ;r ;- x ,-r :T •:.' r.l rr U -i n in TI •; :'i in •• ro ;: ', rt- r-r .. IL H- r ;- ri rj 'I rr 3 Hi ••- ill < C, • •• h- n > - • • .M 3 a '- •<••> • •• n E •• •_, :c 01 a" ii '1 IT! Ci- fR r*- -c re o r, TI n *•. • .. .• ri 1. 1 a r~ r: ' P 3 rj L-J n t:i rt i-* S O n PI NI r" en r--J ;: o L: 3n~ in CL x ra n M n r ...;• r ^ H ro 01 ro r.lHri i ,1 i? rn ~ D •" o a a r f pi ai BI BI <••> rt rt- rr r_r cr m ro fti Tl LO i> m TI i- p. 3 x m »• i< pj rt ,n re in t— 1 ITJ K-1 < PI •••• t-i rti i-i n < u IT; rt |TJ •• >--i Ul LI rn n. i--i TJ a. .. •• 01 •• * . o • '...• o :];• c:: o r> r L- i- -4.1 x to o M t-' 1— rn i-i •-•1 i-j M n- •';• D:' • -j ?< 01 01 ro i -o -0 -0 -0 1 ) '-I u rn '-'. iri •; ; : . n PI 14 * 1 1 x v ' l-H ' I n "ir n :> n - 1 ":i r" '1 r 1 XI fTi T> ', r : ! (• T i j L i .";.-• .. _ "i> '" -.-' rn 1 1 • • U i) nrt ^i ~~j "T :< ,-i -H ! 1 ~i> rr n r: ; r- : 11 ,1.1 ;i CJ • I -0 , :;'] ! 1 LO -- -•- -• n o.J "Ti o 7> rr- m •0 ?•• _{ ~nrrn o • IS I ' :,-nc : OZIMIC C3PP .TI^IC C*.i.-e No.: 1705? ' SAG Me. : 2PA SAMPLE NC *i\ .'-7 —r *"•. •* X •' -•' '•-•' : B::7~3 •_ •: ^ ' ; :-•_ — p- ..- "1 CJ«-' T ' (g/fr.L) S_ L-!:: E<?.,r.pi£ ID: 89010/--24. Level .- CTFC -;-j.- r.-,sd ) LO','J Sate Received: 06/12/89 ^: r--± dec. __11. dec. ___ i. (SoDr/Cont/Bcnc) SCNC p: (Y/!\!) K__ pH: 3.9 I-ate Extracted: 05/ IT/89 Dste Analyzea; 07/0 1/S9 Dilution Factcr: 4 . Q ____ '-• *"•v. i r~ r— x i T- i—. r-, ~ T r~ 1.1 i 11» i T T~ £-• , L, UIM L- EI \ I T. !-i ! i w I M <_' N 1 i b J i i :. i:: /• t *-* -r JL •* i~-. ; 1 C 0 396 ~. . '.j 67 - , i- 4 — % ,- .. j ... "! .' " ••"- o • _ V.* .' T? - ... -r-t , / — .— ^ - - - _1 -95 C7- ~" / -' - 4 6 n 4 .. • CJ ~' f* f< — ^i _.. - ••- 1 r~: r= _ _ ,— . *~ _pr« .'. C; _ t-'l ~' -- f: 7 - (— r~. _ CJ . < • ,-. — 2 —— —— — r'henoi -4 ——————— :bis(2-Chlaroethvi iEther 3 — • —————— "^-Chlorophenol -1 ——————— i , 3-Dichlorobenrene 7 1.4 Dichlorobenzu-ne - o Benzyl Alcohol 1- ——————— i ,2-Dichlorobenzene 7 ———————— 2-Methylchanol "2-9 ————— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl )Ether _ •~* •"•• ! i fc^ t it y 1 p M s n o 1 -~7- ------- N— Ni trcso-Di-n-Prou-y 1 S.T. ir.e j. Hexachloroethar.e 7---- — — — Nitrobenzene 1- isophcrone -••- —— - ——— 2--!JitroDhenol ...p.. ——— . —— 2.4-Dimethvlchencl '•— —— — — — — — Eifin zoic Mcid -- ------- tie (2-Chloroethoxv )^e throne -2 — - — —— 2 , 4-Dichlorophenol -1- ————— --1 , 2, 4-Trichlcrcbenzene -.-. _.. — ..... — |,; -, -.j-jt ha i ene • T ——————— -1-Chi -roa.-.il ine 3 — ————— -Hexachlorobutadiene ... ———— .. — 4-Chlora-3-Me thy 1 phenol >- -' Methyl naphthalene 4 —————— — Hexachlaracvclcpent = diene 2- —————— -2, 4, 6-Trichloropneno.] 4. ——————— 2,4,5-TrichloroDhencl 7- — • ———— 2-Chlc re-naphthalene 4 -- —————— 2-Ni troan i 1 ine _.-- ——— .. —— Dime thy 1 F Iithaiats- ...r:__ — ._.. — Acenaphthy lene _•-•.-_ _ ———— - ^ 6— Dini trotoluer.e i 50':> 1500 1500 1 50O 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1 500 150O 1500 1500 1500 7200 1500 1500 1500 7 7 COO 1500 1500 1500 27000 1500 1 500 7200 1500 7200 1500 1500 1 500 1 :u . 4 1 1 VJ !LJ :u :u !U :u :u :u ;U ;u !U t *~ •• * • i t t «— i ID :u :LJ :u :u !U :u :u I SV'-l TUT 001 O402 133. /B7 I V BY770 •" b '"• r r! e-: ~ ^ " M T '" Case No. : :2 '^9 3X97C i;;: •.' =•-! 1 /'is^tcr } gGIL l£- wt/\-Dl: 30.2 i_- a U '.:_. £1 iTi pat i U i Lab File ID: A1251 ,1 Level: ( lo'.-v/miid ) LOW 1 7. Moisture.; not dec. U dec . ' Hxtractiar,: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) 3F'C Cleanup: (V/N) N pH: Dite Received: . 06/12/89 Date Extracted: QA/JT/gr Date Analysed: 07 ,'01/59 Diluticn Factor: ^.0 COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITE: '. ••.ic/L ".r us/Kg) U3/i--:^x- ' 99—09-2 — — ————3 9 T» -T —, r-, _ __ __ _ _ _•"" _ _*" ~ — — — — — _-— — — 51-2S-5————————2,-1-Dinitrcphenol 100-02-7———————4-Nitrcphenol___ 132-6--9—————--DibenzoTu.ran______________ 121-14-2———————2,4-Dinitrctalu.ena________ B4-66-2————————Eiethy i p htha 1 ate__________ 7003-72-3——————4-Chlorcphenyi-pheny1ether. 86-73--7————————-Flucrene__________________ 100-1C—6————• -4-Nitroani1ine 534-52-1———————4,6-Dinitro-2-r1ethy] prenol. S6-30-6-———————N-Ni trosod i pheny 1 ami^e ( 1 * 101—55-3———————4—BrGQOpheny 1-phery le-ther_ IIS-"7^-!----————Hcx^.chr. era benzene_________ T7 2£-5————--——-FentanM 85-01- 8————— -—Phenantnrer,e_._ .orephenol 3/L_7.-._2---——————-Di-n-Butylphthals.te. 2 06--14 -0———————F1 uoran thene_______ 129-00-O———————Pyrsne_____________ Bf.- 60-7- —— ———— - 7a.it y '• benn . '7J.--T-':- ! 5i-55- 210-01-9- 117-P1-7- 117-34-0- 205-99-2- -Bsnzo ( a "; Anthracene. -Chrysene ————bic(2-Ethylhe;:vl )Phthai ate ————Di-n-Octyl Phthalats_____\ —----SenZD(b)Fluoranthene______ 207-08-°———————Benza( k ) Fluoranthene______ 50-32- 8 ——— —— —-Benso ( a j Pyrene____________ 193-3?-5 ——————— Indeno (1,2, 3-cd )Pyrer:e____ 53-70-3---- — -——Dibtjnr ( a .. h } Anthracene_____ 191-24-2- —————Benzc(g,h.i)Pcrylene______ 1500 7 2 '••-• '-• 7200 1500 15 CO 1 f OO 1500 1500 ilC 0 1500 1500 < =,->.-. .L »..' •_« •-.' 150 1 500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 -i C *•'% (-» J, W--' -' 1500 Ci-nn-'L separated frc.T, TUT 001 0403 FORM I SV-2 Rev. I I I IB r,3: ^;i:7'X 2C •' ?G/,nL. ; L , I c^r..p, e- wt/ vol : Level; (law/meo) LOW % Mcisture: not dec. 1 •'•'. dsc. ___ (Extraction: (SepF/Cunt/Gsnc) 92NC !..i.L, Sample 12 : C :.;.b Fil ID; .' .L:.T.~ 1 Date Pezeivcd: 06/12/r?9 Date ~:;tr I EFC Cleanup: (Y/N) N__ pH : 9.4 "ate Analyzed: 06/29/9^ Dilution Fatter; 1.0 CAS r''J. 3 2 'IP1?'. -!-;:; CCNCZr.'TRATICN LT.'7"S: '-..;g,'L -.:;- ; ^.'Kgj L^/'-'E ' 108-??-2-—————-F"- = rol_ __________________: : lli--'-4-4——•—— — t i s f 2-c:-,l = rcethyl ;Etr.=?r_____I I 541-73-1-—-———-1,3-Dichlorobenzene_________I I 100-51-6——————Penzyl Alcohol ~\ \ 95-50-1———-———1,2-Di = hlorobenzene________' ; 37638-32-9—————bis(2-Chlorcisopropv] ' Ethc^r_'• : 106-44-5———————fl-Meth\ I 621-64-7-—--—— ; 98-95-3-————-—;-.!j. t.rcbc--=---.e_ . C3-7r.-5—----———•":-:•:: t rophe-.c 1 i 65-85-0-————•—-! _________________ I 111-91-1 —— -----—fc;.s'. 2~C:hlor-ethe:•;>•;. Methare___i I 120-83-2————-—2,4-Dichlorophencl__________I i ^: - 20--3- —— - -——Nf.ph t %a 1 e:\o__________ I I 106-•-'•--3-- ---------•-'•; r-.lcrcani line______________! I 59-50-7 — —-————4-CMcro-3-Methvl=her.al I , 71-57-6-—-——-—2-Methylnaphthalene________I ! 77-47-4-——————Hoxacniorocyclcpentadiene____! ! 83-06-2———•———2,4 ,6-Trichlorcphencl_______I I 95--95-Z- — — ———2 , 4 , 5-^ I 9j- TC- 7- -—-——-2-Chlnrcnsphthalene ; SS-74-4---—— — 2-Kitr=::-.r,ilir.s____ I 131-; 1- 3-—-—•-.--DifrctS-.v: P:-;th&lat^_ I 203-9/..-8—-—-—-Ac<=naphthyiene____ 1 60/::-r>-2~~———--2, c-":.-, it rctoluene 73RM I EV-] T20 : J 330 3 SO 330 3 SO 3SO 3SO 3 BO 39.O 330 7SO :u : j 33 0 " ,~ "' 330 :: 900 3 1 0 3SO 380 * •; .-,.-. 330 3SO 330 llOO 3 GO 3SO 1900 -T -•- ,-•, 1900 — - .-•. •. 390 320 ;u 1 C. ; u TUT 001 0404 II • ,--i-»! •— r-. p i— ft i, i T ^-. r^ ,• . i r- i \/-f~- T r-- - - -r — n I J ,-.,^. _«i l.;i—.!•-*! •_-;.• ;-! *"-!*•» L- t CI- * C»' .. i-l . : 3V771 :CRP - :£ Tip -E 30.1 •E2T002S I- Q - -r- — "• r- i.. Oi--. .llf- J. W. _ab File IDi I,, tract GPC CIe ion -.r.up: I CAB '-r. : dec. 14 dec. EepF/Cant/Sonc) (Y/N) N__ PH: COMPOUND 3.4 Date Receivec: O6/12/S9 Date Extracted: 06/13/39 Date Analyzed: 0&/29/S9 Dilution Factor: 1 ._Q_____ ^MTI-.!T'AT T O*.« I 'K.:TT^ ' Jl «*t_C.i '•< I 1 '--I-! I A k^l ^ L..J V i. I »_• • ,„/( _ .._ . . y/ l_ :-'t .-l » 99-: <7 -1 ———————— 3-Nitrrsr.il ine !.J3-._ ' - 9 ———————— Acensphtf-.ene :-,!- -^ '-:• ————— 2,^-Dinitrcchenci iuo-.-. 2--/- —————— 4-Nitroohencl 132-c:4-9 ——————— Dibcnrcfuran '2-J-14-2-- —————— 2,4-DinitrGtoluene 34- -ii-2 ———————— Diethylptithalate /U-03-72-3 —————— 4-Chloraphenyl-phenylether __ Gc.-73 7'-- ——————— Fl Liorene 100- :. 0-6 ——————— 4-Nitroaniline -3-;-'-l-i ——————— a ,6-Din: tro-2-tlethyl phenol __ E-6-3 : -A- —— ———— ni-Nitrasociiphsriyl£iTiine ( 1 } _ __ j 01 - = f -3 ——————— 4-BroTiCDphsn v 1 -p hen v let he: r 1 li?-"T4- • ------ —— Hexschlorccenzene Gv-'i--!:- ——— —— — ric-nts.chlcrcphenal oj.- !. .:.--,_•-• - Plienanthrene 12 :.: - 12-7 ——————— Anthracene C:4-7-^-2 — - ————— Di-n-Butvlchth.slo.te 206--4-0 ——————— Fluor an thene 129-00-r ——————— Fyrene t; r -;'- c--: - -—---.. ——— -B,.I t y 1 ber, r v 1 p h t ha 1 a te c- • r"-- -^-••- — -- —— -3 . 3 ' -Dichlcrcbenzidins -^ 15-3 -Sense (a) Anthracene 2iE-Oi-9~ ——— - —— Chrysene :.;. 7-R1-/-- —————— bis(2-Ethy:hexyi )Phthalate __ ii7".1-4-0 ——————— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 205--c?-2 ——————— Benzc(b)Flucranthene 207-- JP-9 ——————— BeriZGdOFlucrs.nthene :: :-.>- 32- B- ——————— Benzc ( a )Pyrene 1T3-39.-5-- ——— —— I "den 3 (1,2, 3-cd 5 Pvrene - - - •_:•-.: • -- —— — - — Diber.z (», h ) An thr scene j.9i -2 ' -2~ —————— B»n zo ( q , h , i ) Pery 1 ene 1900 380 1900 1900 3BO T»r~. ^ -•i-'O 7PO 3SO = 9 1900 1900 330 320 3SO IT'OO -T- ,—— \ ,"•>. J t>*J •__' *-» \-J •^or. 380 3SO 770 3 SO 3SO •^PO -_' W ".' 330 380 3SO 380 • 3SO 7 GO 3SO 1 1 •. _ 1 1 :-_• 1 1 u 1 « 1 1 u t « v_- U J . | W i i u_- U U . ' -J •J U U U * 1 U U t 1 UJ U U U L! U o L: w *J !J L Lit: ^eparated froir, Diphenyiar.-,.ine FORM I EV-2 636 TUT 001 0405 ( i..* ..., I."J'ilri 3n ;• k rr ni in iBn PI•^ inrt IBa -»,-o3 CO. fj ~J1 ' !_,. i-i n SUM J W> 3 y\ 03 •< * <C t-' 0 1 HI -r, t J =< _£• r< WN '^ VkJ VJNJ H CH O U*. O 0 r> r \ •* rn -0 i'.J M ! ! 4 !J O .in 1 ' J j-./i Y i 1 1 1 1 1 ifj ^ (7! H i) rr M HI 0 3 .— . M UJ '-- •« Hi "r * -'' rr i.,. ,_• -•— • 1> TJ 3 IB rt T rr -< 1 m ri ri m IB 3 m r..j \_.-i •-13 -43 O 0 C C. O5 __ CD K- i n •-0 O ij i W i.'J lO -0 ! CM r..n i i 1 1 I 1 1 1 K4 Ml 3 IT! a 3 Sis n a o a — •-- ii i~» •— • . -n to •< i.j rn 'l 3 n rti a —— • 2 -^ili IT! C-l U -0 -0 0 0 C C to -"j .-.illi •c I tJ1 IB rj C) .-.. 7T x... T] (.^ c: Ci Hi 3 rt:r iB3 IB i-J -43 O c: »j i-- O f • ui ~-j o cn -9 r-, ! I to o 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1rn trt rb~ t- 3 M 3 0 I cr n "~'° rt" 3J X' r 6 t! i rr 0* rt 3 rr rt pi T »-• rn si 3 rt m ID c-i •: i o o 0 0 c c ^ r* -J r.b i-» ••4 FTf- in ^-. x, t J i l r m : rr f rr -<; >—.rr (ll :•.' •< J— ' Tl 3" rt -r D.' i— 1 a'rt m il 4* -j oi •: U L M i.n • O Ll3 :• ' "n P-A 1 N 0 i •3 w T rr T 3 x W n 0 n "- 3 1' B — 3rtrr-I1'n ro 3 ra 4 C J 0 -J3 :• o : c * -;1 C3 M ^J C''i ' * 0"! : ! • t - : * ( ^ K1 O 4ifJi.il J ^A C i ! VQ O j ..J. ; ij i ^* • • fr- l ^ - i •'"•• !":"i i ! p.i '..' i 'j j .-.' i i fj ii'; •-• ^ .ji -' i • C'- -.J i.n ! •'• 4* ; M i f> i.n i-' ~J i ! i ! rn ' n ; : i ! O O 1 -- • <"• ' J ! i ! i ! ! ! ! 1 1 i ! : ; i l l 1 1 i l l l : i l l l l i l l l l ill i J i ill H n~ TI TI n !:• TJ n ;c •'•* • r x' f i- 3 T ro m i (••J r»- T C 1 rt in ."J ;:: Ml • < ra o 3 rr n rt n> "i l >-•• 3 -i IT .1.1 r' n n !.-•> r.T m PJ rn p.! 3 n rr 3 >- rn 3 c n ^ rr t- u ii 3 ,-r rt ra rr >j o TI rr r-4 rr •< n ^ o ~i rr >• j --"x ro ^ j ri iti ~"i n o o i- 3 n rj n HT 3 "1 TI IB ;T IB T> i"J "••: o rr rt rr n >-•• (T rt rr rn n i rj rr BI 3 rr: T.I 3 DI »-• 0 3 rr N |--1 DI '•-' rf! rn 1" P! ft 3 a rr ro < M III >•-• :i m in rtrr ill T i » - -J CI (,-J C--J W vJ i'A -0 ' -1 vt QJ --0 -43-0-43 -0 -0 O -0 -0 O O O O O O O O O 0 c: c: c c c c c c c c 03 0- 1 o rr- ?r _r \-. rt T Uin 0 LX H- 13 rr IB3 < ^-* DIa K 3 iB X-, hi X.X L'J ^3 O t: ( '.n ;- ro -j !',•! ••;• o .:'•• t> •:> l •::• f L.I M > ". ' .! - J M M o- : l i ''i l l l i l l 1 i l II l i l 4» 4i T) 4^. .. | ^ | r> z c n i t- o rr •.'' rt "i ^-' !-•• -, fil 0 n rj 3 -r ^ J• (3j IB 0 rr 3 TJ "i H- rr f'l H- iB 1 h" 3 tO 3 •< 1 III •- 3 1 IB T'i rr -r _r ra < 3 t— * %r" Tl •-- rr iji .Tl rr 3 rr Cl IB t-j "T I-" h* •o >i3 LI u O O --0 -0 o o o o c: ci c: c; CO 4i n-. to U H- m ,-»• rr ~< •-< Tlrrrt"r in »•-• D'rr IB i'-j -0 O c: .j t* tJ ''••! r1 t J 1 ! .,'i ---- rO -'3 i tO M - H- j'a rr ru 0 3 H. ri 3 0 t- -h rt c: "1 "i O "' ri- 3 Cl c: m3 IB 1. 1 •- 1 -0 -1 0 0 c c: r* ,••-, O 1 to i-J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _t»i -.* H'. rt ->0 Tl'r IB3 171 I--' )-' -0 O0 c: ui 1:0 M t-* Ll -!3 ! i ! t o i'; c 03 tj -0 1 . ! r.n ri •.') 1 ! • ! 1 1 ! i 1 1 ! 1 i 1 1 1 i ! 1 l ! i i i i i : to j. u •- r-i ! 4> IB Z i :: i '• U :). , i- 1 '• Tl "1 3 -r f! »'• rt "' ft rr 3 ~ rri " 0 :: •-•• •n m »••• : r 3 m rn 30 *••* ..w | * -0 U -0 . '• '.;-) . "• .;:• o .-• U C '•-'. 03 -n C3 Cl r.i ! 1 <ll -.-> 3 n r: TJ T •• ;' j , --X -< "V. Z •^x ;; r : (3 "i :"i (•- ^ r t.J Tl ~Ji.. ?D * .... f j - r 3 ih *'n r n - y C! H O -i "I •- J> •-• :'.: -H C. U ! M ft -•- n >••• • - ;: o i/'l 3 .... - r~ .-: "n 1! " t-i 1l : 1 -•) f'l ".. rn rt .-•: .• n : 1 "i f « * * • £3 n x f n :t r • /' " IT! U r' 1:i V ft 1C < •-• rr tr ~ ri ra TI "i pi »••• >-.. > • t • i :i ri in ..: r,i : i • rl r; r -• £ - n S ^- -• •• :.i IP --. in -: n n •••• o H- n :i o >-• -j -( 0 v .. -.. T rr •••. '. ' ' U3 £i 3i I l Hi CL (ii rt Tl m CL !Ti TI n -• --; ri i .1 n r in <••• 3 o ''.J O ?n rt s-» i; O n Ii rn • r~ 03 tO Z 0 Ci h x~- itl • a % ••• m ? ' .1 ri r • . ,• i ni fO '':3 g n [0 "3 i!i Li '• ',) t-j u f" r~ PI fll Ol C: i;l rr rr rt r;r rj IB ru re ~;~\ fj1) i> n 31 ^- ni 3 :•: IB ^ 3 •U rr n III Tl !•••• "i (Ti '••' ni jj. n ffi M n < w HI rt fli v '-I f'3 o. ni a a ^ *<• Cl •• •• f;~) • • o •::• o i> 03 b" n- •";- o^ H- -n • \ to o tO I--1 !-' I'-J H- J •>! t-.3 0 O W •, '"•*. '*x '-J •M' 03 1:3 C3 i -0 -0 -0 -JJ rO 4 Cr- -a • i. i .-; li r'. i "i L ! n r'i '",.' ••'• i- 1 ~ i. J :"3' " t "i j -" i'3 H ..-1 ;j v ' .'! n "• !'0 T-, r* 1 ^ri i' "j V. 1 , r- -;- ; 1 f3 ^ il (0 3 rr :. 1 ">• -.i i M .;• ; t • •• 'i 'i^ i '• "il s::. n rj I •.-i O to 03 - . . - n Ml "il ••' 1^ -i •-.! 03 to :> *" T! ~m \ -.Td I t I ' »• I T r~ f~- r-. ¥. i /•* i * . r~ T r-- r* •-. T- ,-, r- i : r- r— -r -iHiL-c- t-MMi-tL '. ^-1 S A.— i h. Lr-.r:.L i C _ _ 4. .... _. „ 4, B .• r-. T". r-v,--, .'iT? ______________ wj i i L. r c.-v u. L. " •_. '11^-^^K.^u '."• "PA SAMPLE ND. •„&. : 2 7 '1 : C _ Ci,£e . . . _ , . _ t / -4- .. . \ /T-l T I -. . V -: ... - j. / v.i- v_-_ : j Oi-.' A L E2G !\!o. : 5X979 (g/mL) E_ Lab S^npie ID; L;'-?01O7-27 Lab File I"j A1268 (Irw/med) LOUJ : net d^c. __U dec. GF-C -actioni (SepF/Cont/Sanc) 5DNC Cleanup: (Y/W) N__ pH: 9.; Date Received: OA/12/S9 Date Extracted: QA/13/C0 Date Analysed: 06/30/39 Dilution Factor: 1. 0____ I I C 2 M POL'NT- CONCENTRATION UNITS; (uc/L r:r ug/Kr) L'"/KG - 08-9?--2- ———— — Phenol 111--4--4 ———— — — bi=(2-Chloroethyl ) Ether ~. IT tr —**•-• «-v r~ • i_ ^ _ ^ i_ ._ ... •• • ./ -,-o ^i Lnlci ophenc.i 541-77-1 ——————— 1,3-Dichlorobensene 106-4t— 7 ——————— 1 , 4-Bichlorobennene 100-31-6 ——————— Benzyl Alcohol O K, „_ ^ ("v . -\ A *~f TT ^ _- t ^ _ ._ __ L .. , , _ ,- ,, __ 95-4 S-7- ——————— 2-Me thy 1 phenol 39c:3S-32-9 ————— bis (2-Chloroisopropy 1 ) Ether _ 106-44-5 ——————— 4-Me thy 1 phenol c-21-64-7- —— ——— N— Ni troso-Di— n— Procy lamine 67-^2- 1- ——————— Hexachlcroethsne 9S-c'3--3 ———————— Nitrobenzene 7S-59-1 ———————— Iscphorcne B3---7':- -5- ——— ——— 2-NitrcDhenol 105-67-9 ——————— 2, 4-Dimethvl phenol 65-85-0 ———————— Ben zoic Acid lll-r-l-l ——————— bi=(2-Chlaroethoxy) Me thane 120-83-2 ——— ——— 2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-82-1 ——————— i , 2 ,4-Trich lorobenzene 7.1. -20-7 - - - ————— Nap htha 1 ene 106-- ••- 7 -•";- — - —— — 4-Chlcroani line 37- -'F -3 ———— —— -Hexachlorcbutadie-ne 59-50-,- ———————— 4-Chloro-3-Methyl phenol 91-C7-6-- —————— 2~Me thy 1 naphthalene 77--r • — i ———————— Hexachl orocyc lopen tadiens f!.3 .i.-2 ——— — -- — 2, 4, fe-7ric hi ore-phenol (73-95-4 — • —————— 2,4,5-TrichloroDhenol 9 1-i C'!-7 ———— ——— 2-Chloronaph thai ene G3-74-4 ——— - ———— 2-N'itroaniline .' 31 -11- 3- ------ — Dimethyl Phthslate 20 c. - ^ •-. ~<z - —— - - —— Ac en a p h t hy 1 ene 60 6- ?•...-- 2- —— ——— 2 , 6-Dinitrotoluene ————————————————————————————————————————————— ___ 37O -r ••? f"\ 370 370 370 37O 370 370 37O 370 370 370 -_ .' ••„•• 37O 1800 370 370 £-.00 37 C 370 370 940 370 370 IE 00 370 1 f* • "* f"'- lo'-'O ^T"7?"1 37O 370 ' i -_" U U U i t0 t 1 •_' 1 1 *_J i; 1 1o 1 1 •J Li 1 1 \«f i * LJ 'J U U U IJ U U U L: !J U U LJ ' 1 i_l |u e^i i FORM I SV-i TUT OO.1 O4O7 I I I •c SEMI VOLATILE ORGAN ICS ANALYSIS E'ATA '\.HEET ERA EfMPL NO. I -b Name: ± '<F:P Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No,: 12053 Matr i;;: t soi 1 /Hater ) SOIL Sample rit/vol : 3i. Level: (low/med) LOW (q/mL) G "/. Moisture: not dec. n dec. ___ Extraction: 1SepF/Cont/Sonc) SQNC GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N__ pH: .9.1 CAS NO. C on tr Bcr: 63090023___ !_ SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX97S Lab Sample ID: 890107-27___ _ Lab File IIJ: A1268____ Date Received: 06/12v_89 _ Date Extracted: O6/13/39 Date Analv;:ed: O6/30/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CGNCENTPATI ON UNITS: (uq/L or i.g/Ka) UG/KG I I I 99-09-2———--—3-Nit rcani line____________._ 83-32-9———-- —-Ac en 5 phthene_____________ 51-23-5————————2.4-Danitrophenol ______ ____ 100-02-7———————4-N.itrophenol____J_____'__1__ 132-64-9———————Diben20furan _________'_'______ 121-14-2———————2,4-DinitrotolLiene_______________ 84-66-2-———————Diethylphthalate________________ 7005-72-3——————4-Chloropheny1-phenylether__ 86—73—7——————-—Fluorene______________________ 1OO-1O-6————--—4-Nitroan.iline______________ 534-52-1—————•—4, 6-Dd nitro-2-hethyl phenol__ 36-30-6—————-——N-Nitrosodiphenv] amine ( 1) __ 101-55-3—— — 118-74-1——— 87-86-5———— 85-01-3———- 120-12-7———— S4-74-2———— 206-44-O——— 129-OO-0----- 85-6S-7——— — 91-94-1 —— —— 56-55-3——- — 213-01-9———— 117-31-7——— 117-34-0 —— — 205-99-2——— 207-03-9——- 50-32-8——— 193-39-5———————Indenot 1 ,2,3-cd )Pyrene__ 53-7O-3————————Dibenz ( a , h ) Anthracene__ 191-24-2———— -4-BrciTiopheny 1-pheny 1 ether_ -He x ac h 1 o r o b en z en e __________ -Pentachlorophenol „__________ -Phenanthrene _____________ -Anthracene -Di-r,-Butylphthalate._ -F1uoran thene_______ -F'yrene._____________ -Euty1 benzylphthai ate__ -3.3'-Dichlorobenzidine. -Benzo(a)Anthracene_____ -Chrysene__ __ _____ -bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. -Di-n-Octyl Phthalate_______ -Benzot b)Fluoranthene_____ -Benzo(k)Fluoranthene_____ -Benzo(a)Pyrene ____ __ -Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene__ 1 £00 "r. "/ J~> 180J 1SOO 370 37O 370 37O 30O 1300 1800 370 370 370 1SOO 170 37O 370 370 370 370 710 370 370 36 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 : J ;u ,'U !U !U I t i U :u :u !U :u ; u :u :u !U !U :u !U :u :u ;:i iLI :u :u iij ;u :u :u I (1) -- Can nor be separated from Dip hen y la mine FORM TUT 001 04OS I I I r*'— *•?* T ', : r~ ' •"•-»-•!• i ^- /—v r", /T*( r- *• » T r— / • ,-\ K » /^ e \ .• f^-_ f r-- ^^. •-• -^ /•» .—-1. | tT" fT T Contract: 6EC90028 3Y775 I - ^ .- Level : 7. MOIH Extrac r- r~, r* «-• •* t^-I L, 1_ ^ : i i i i i i i i ! : I ! 1 i 1 ! i 1 ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— : ______________ X ———————————————————————————————————— ... ....... —————— : -i'^cil /-.-;•-- r) r"~L !_«b S^inple ID; G70107-29 i-;t/v,. 1: 30.6 fq/mL) E L^b File ID: A1233 tlow/med) L^W Date Received: 06/12/39 ture; rot dec. 12 dec. Date Extracted; O6/13/89 ti,_ni (SepF/Cont/Sonc) 5CNC Date f- tsnut: (Y/N5 N pH: S.9 Diluti CCNCENTRATIC ~n3 !-'C- . COMPOUND (uc/L or ug/ •v T-09-2 ———————— 3-K'it re-aniline Hr-32-9 ———————— McenapJ-.thene 31 22-3- ——— ——— 2,4-Dinitrcphenol 100-02-7- ——————— 4-Nitraphenal «T»^-. • * • ! - » • T-V • i_ ^^ . • r- •* — rv j- •_' *L. t- T > : _• •! 1— : G 1^ ^.- D 1 LI 1 Cl M 121-14-2 ——————— 2.4-Dinitrotoluene 84— t.fs-2 ———————— Diethylphthalate 7005-72-3- ————— 4-Chlorophenyl-Dhenvlether S6-77-7- — ————— Fluorene 100-10-6 ——————— 4-Mitroaniline 334-52-1 ——————— 4, 6-Dinitro-2-Methyl phenol __ S6-3 " -<b ———————— N-Nitrosodipheny lamine ( 1 ) 101-1.3-3- ————— -i-Bro,TiC.phenyl-phenvlether 1 1C--7-'--- 1- - ———— -—'exachl Cjrcbenzsne :. /-c ._•;.- - ————— r-'enter.chlcrrpheno] ._ _• -O; -;------ --------Phsnai- threne 1 20- i 2- 7- - - — -- — Anthracene o 2. -7. >•:-.- -::-—-• —— - —— Di-n-Butylp!-.thalats 206--~ 4-C- ———— — Fl uoran thene 12?-SI C:-0 ——————— P'vrene r~-6-:-7- — •- —— — -^utyi benzyl phtha late "1- -94-1 — — •— ——— 7.3* -Dichlarobenridine 5i- 55-3- — ————— Fsnso ( a } Anthracene 218-01-9 ——————— Chrvsene 217-E1-7-- —————— Li5(2-Ethylhexyl )Phthalate __ 117-24-0- ——————— Di-n-Qctyl Ph thai ate 205-99-2 ——————— 3enzc(b)Fluoranthene 207-CE-9 ——————— Benzc(k)Fluoranthe-ne 50--32- C-- —— -•- — - T enzo(a)Pyrene 19...-37-rJi— - — • — — Ir.deno ( 1 . 2, 3-cd ) Pyrcr.e 5_ - . -...- - - —— --- -I :.; benz ( a , h ; Anthracene J.vi-^4- 2- ----- — -Ben 20 ( Q , h, i )Perylene nalyred: 06/27/89 on Factor: 1.0 :N UNITS: Kn) UC/KG,.»x 0 ^J i 1800 ! U 4 *"•• »"* ."» 1 1 ' j. w ••.' *.' • '— ' 1300 ! U 370 ! U 370 ! U 370 ! U 370 ! U 370 ', U isoo :u 1SOO iU 370 ! U 370 : U 370 : U 37 O ; U 370 I U 370 ! U 37O ! U 370 I U 370 ! U 730 1 U 370 ! U 370 ! U 59 ! J 37-0 ! U 370 ', U 370 ! U 37 O i U 370 ! U 370 ! J 370 I U i : i ... -- ' i i i i i i i i 1 i i 1 i 1 • i i i 1 i I i 1 i t i i i i I t 1 i 'I _-.•...-.-rt ::•-- CEIO £.rated from Diphen-ylarr.ine FORM I SV-2 TUT 001 0409 1/87 Rev. 1 ^ J. '_ Ccntra-ct: freP^CC^G ^so Me. i JJ205P rAS Mo.: _____ IT-PA SAMPLE MO. BY775I1S :•'..; ti-i.c: : re il /water) 22-I Sample ID: 390107-2^:^ Pile ID: A 123 4 _______ Level: (lo;-;/.-ed) L.CUJ Date Received: 06/12/39 dec. 'I Mc:,i?;.-:-i;rr>: ^cz C3C. 12 E?.:tr,7-ctirr. : ( SepF/Con t/Scnc ) SDNC GPC C:cr,.-L;p: (Y/t^) N __ pH: 8.9 ate Extracted: 0&/13/S0 Date Anal y red: 06/27/39 Dilution Factcrt 1 . 0 I CCNCEMTRA7ICM UNITS: (ug/L rr ug/Kc) L'2/KG •- ° - •'- -.' - - ... N' i t r c a n i 1 i n e ri-28-f ———— ——— 2,4-Dinitrochenol lvu-02-7 ——————— 4-NitrcBhenol ....:• 2 £.- , - - - Di benzof u.ran j.--~j.~- "^ ——— 2 . 4-Dinitrotcluene £.4-36-2-- ————— —— Die thy! ph thai ate 70 05-72-3 —————— 4-Chlorcphenyl-phenyl ether __ "A- 73-7- ——————— Fluorene 100-10-6 ——————— 4-rUtroaniline t"7-".-52-l— - —— — 4, 6-Dinitro-2-Meths 1 phenol 26 ....:.; 6 - N Ni trasudipheny lamine (1) __ - 01-55-3- ——— - — 4-ErofTiQphenyl-pnenvlether - 13-74-1 ———— —— He- x*c hi era benzene ^ r*-r- —— ———— t-'entachl-jroohenol G5-01 -S-- — ———— Phenanthrene 1 *-• '•• -' — — f /N J_ l_ — — - — -*- ' t—ti»i_r~iictu.t?pie G4-74-2 ———————— Di -n -Butyl ph thai a te 206-44-0 ——————— Fluoranthene 129-OO-0 ——————— Pyrene S5-te-7-— -— - —— Butvlbenzylphthalate '•'...-- 4- i — - —————— 3 , 3 ' -Dichlorobenzidine 56-55 -3- —————— -Be.-zo ( a } Anthracene v. _.-..j '.'j. / -—hr ysene 117-B1-7 ——————— bis(2-Ethylhexyl )Ph thai ate __ 117-S4-0 ——————— Di-n-Octvl Ph thai ate JC 5 99 ••• • EtenzcC b)Fluoranthene I.*.., -'Jc— 9 ——————— E-ienzo (k ) Fluoranthene 'f '• 32- S- —— ————— Eer-zo ( a ) Pvrer.e 93-3?-5- ——— ——— Indeno(l,2,3-cd)Pyrene 5,.. - ."".--3 —————— r — DJ benz (a, h) An thracene :. 9 1-24-2 —— ———— Benzo (q , h, i )Fery lene 1S'0'~> 370 1BOO 1SOO 370 370 370 . 370 1300 1800 370 370 370 1300 370 370 37O 370 370 370 750 370 370 54 370 •_•• / O 370 TT*-» •_.' / *•_' 370 370 i i :u !U :u :u su :u :u :u !U ;U i i i i U :u :u ;u :u 1 1 1 i < i !U :u ;u :u :u :u i i ;u ;u :u :u :u :u ! U Of • o< - C^.-;nc.t be separated frcm Dipheny iamine FORK I GV-2 TUT 001 04.10 1/S7 Rn-v. I I EFA r;,-.MPLE NO. ;, Me. C ;,•-.; 3FC 1 .- ... i. Cl -e; 1EJMI2 :;i":P Csr:zract: . .. . .._•; ,, ; - ;.,, . , r . _ s :I,. = D ^5 N0- : . :;. = il.',.;;.t.-r) S-GIL i v t / . c J L 30.G (g/fr.L; E ___ Mc«/,7,Ed) LOV tu,.^ ;,I:.T .... 12 dec> •ticn: -rSepF/Cont/Sonc) SONG c?on:lp: (Y/N1) N __ PH: 3.9 ccr-jcc? » 9o_ =: - 2-—— ———— 3-"Nitrcar.ilir.3 0 - ... - -• _ •- _. . . ... _. -. . ,- ,_ ,-. n .- ,- : - J- V- c _ f_- *- . -.- *_. v fc i. f i. ' a. Pi I ll i C1 ^J . i O I t L-1 j. lO:>-02-7- —————— -4-Nitrcch6ncl i32-/:4-9- —————— Dibenzo-furan 12:- : ^-2 ——————— 2,4-Dinitrstcluene n -',•--£• -2 —— ~ ——— CiethvlPhthalate . 005 .-7_-3-~~- ——— 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyleth -; .£. --3... 7. __..__._ ——— Fluorene 10--.10-0— ---- ——— -1-Nitrcaniline rt--/* rr. <~ J ^ / |^- ^ 0 _ _ ^ . -^. * w « _ j _ | m , ^ _ i _ . __ 06 ^..— 6— — -- N-Nitrasodiphenylamine < iO-1 - r"3-7-- -•- ----- --- — •S--Bi-omop!-e?ny 1-pheny lethe :. 12-7-V--1 — -- ———— Htxschlcrobenzene :"-7-- . .:'..--:'•.- ------ — --Ptrvc^cr.lcro v.:.hs~ol K^ ' ' 1-S —— -•- ———— Phens.n threne 12:- •:-'-7 --— ——— Anthracene 54-74-2— ——• ——— Di-n-Butvlohthalate 206- 4/'-0 —— — • — -Fluoranthene 129-'I'0-0 —— ———— Fyrene ?3-£S-7- — - - ——— Botvlben^vlphthalate '•1-^- -1- ————— ---3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine :-/:--r =-.:-.- ----- -^snzo (,:,; Anthracene '— •' .—, .-» 4 — \ f- l._ _ ._j-..- -..'.•. . - — -— — u-iTrysent; 1:7-51-7 ——————— bis(2-Ethylhexyl )Fhthalc 1 17-S4-0 —— - ——— Di-n-Octyl Phths.late 205- ^9-2 ————— — Eenzc(b)Fluoranthene 207-03-9-—— ——— Penza (k)Fluoranthene 3-0-- -32-3- — ——— — Fe-nzo ( a ) Pyrene 173-37-5 — • --- —— IndenoU,2,3-cd)Pyrene L3 7--3 —— — - ——— E-ibenz ( a, h ) Anthracene 19 1-24-2——-- ——— Penza ( -3 , h , i > F'ervl ene • 1} - ^Si-ret Mo separated from Diphenyla.T. sn,r,,=B •-:-. L^.i: Scmpls 12 ' ;-b File 12: Date Received 2ete Z.-c tracts Dste Analyzed Dilution Fact '7FATION UNITS -"" -?. -'!<=; LJ2/ : i i i ! 1I I .er ___ ! ? j T ! • I I I : i : ii tte __ 1 1 1 I 1 1 i i : -ne : ; i -; .._ , OVO- E . 390i07-.2«=*ED A12T?' : 06/12/89 d; 06/13/89 : Oi./ 27 ,'89 cr: i.O . * < i i 4 — . .- -. it. i _ :.. .. ••.' . i j . 370 : :j ; 1200 ; LJ 1 1300 I U ! 370 : LJ : 370 ILJ 1 370 ', U 1 370 ; u : 370 1 LJ 1 isoo ;u i IEOO ;LJ : 370 1 U 1 770 :u : -T -T ,-v I t ' . » •_• / '.' 1 •_' I - -7" •' *. • ' ' ; 370 1 U I 370 i LJ ! 370 ! U ! 370 I U I 370 i U 1 370 ! U 1 750 ;LJ 1 370 1 U 1 370 ! U i 67 i J i 370 ! U 1 370 1 U : 370 1 U ! 370 ' ILJ ! 370 1 U i 370 i U i 370 1 U ! QQQ —— ! Oou I TDRM I SV-2 TUT OO1 0411 CHRP 2c.ciF.li ,..::/•, ci :. . 30.. C :q/mL; G Level: ( 1 :;w/:nec} LOW /; /*" oi-zt.L-.ro>: ,-,ot dec. __0 Extraction: (SspF/Cont/Sanc) GPC C:ear.i_'p: (Y/!'^ N__ dec. T^y97 = *^*—'l\!r SuNl '.0 Date Received:. 06/08/39 Date Extracted: 06/12/59 Date Analysed: 06/19/G9 D i 1 •_•, t i c n F a c t c• r E 1 . 00 I I I I JOR-9r.-::-——————--'henol ____________ 11,-, 4^-^——--—-i:is(2-Chl=rcet:hyl ',& ^^-!;7-r--—————2-Chl CM"phenol_____ 541-73-1-——-——i,3-Dichiorcbsnzene. 106-4i.'.-7-— ————— .1 , 4-Dichlorobenrer.e. .1.00-51-6———————Benzyl Alcohol. •-:':.- 50-1- — - — ——-1 ,2-Dicnlorobenzene 95-4S-7————————2-nethy] phenol. -bis(2-Chlcroisopropy1>Ether_ lCt-44-5--—————4-Me thy 1 phenol____________ 621-64-7-——————N'-Nitrcso-Di-n-Propylf.iTine. 67-72-1 ———————He xachloroe thane__________ 98-95-3--——————Witrctenzcne______________ j. •-',; ~ .: .• • • • " • — — ——— —— — ^;, -v- iji ,iife •;-. hy i phenc . il 1-9l-l---——--• -bis (2--Chlaroethoxy }Met! 120-S3-2-- ———— --2, 4-rich let—phenol____ 120-32-1-———-1,2.4-Tricnlcrobenzene -'•I -2 >- — •—-——— Naphthalsr,K___________\ 1C6-47-3-——- ——4-Chl jroa-iline. 37--6LJ-3---- •-•—— -i- 1;- sac hi CJTO butadiene______ 59 —5 •'.'•— 7—— ——- •—— ——4—Ch 1 ore—3—Me thy 1 pheno i _ 91-57-f.————————2-Methyl naphthalene______ 77-47-4 - -—-——-Hex-r.c h 1 Grc-cyc 1 open tad iene eD-Ct-2—-——-——2,4,6-Trichi.orophencl____\ 95-9?.--4 ———————2 , 4 , 5-Trichlcrophenol____ t- -' f<~ ~» _ *~• " ! _ T _ . _ _ . _ _ _ — U - i . L _ _ T _ ,_ __ T ... — ... v.: • - / — — — — — — — _ _ — „ . j. L. i i_n=i(-i. t^ns i <±rie______ r-. r^ — ', - _ _ _ —. _ I- i j a. ._ _ _ ^ • •• ; _ _ OO . *-.'" - - - - - — - - ^ .-Jj.._f ..jc... i j. i IT! ti___________________ * — / _ •* •: -? _ _ _ _ „ _. r'~ - — - 4- I-. . . - p, 1~ J_ L_ _ 1 _ o_ _. j- -•• J - - —-: — — — — — —— i/j.:. it: T L i ^ > i I- i : i_rict j. c-, utf__________ 2;!'G-';;: .f;—o —— — — — ——Ac:en?.p!"ithv lene___________ •2• ----- — — — 2 , ;'_-E :I.",i trotol uene FOF'M I PV-1 Q 330 ; U 370 !U 33O i U 330 i U 330 ! U 730 : U 330 ! U 33O ! U 1600 !U 160O : i..! 33'? : U 330 1 J 370 ; J TUT OOi 0412 1C :FMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ERA SAMPLE NO. EBLKOi i - ' K i... „. -. « o T T t"' T r* r^ n E:- c- u_ v. • -i -A tiitr • -... i— 1 i i j^'— u, '_•?"* n __ ___________________ Contract: 6SD90025 !__________ ab Code: CFI1*IC Case No.: 12058 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BT747 riatrix; (soil/water) SOIL I ample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G___ level: (law/med) LOW "/' Moisture: net dec. __0 dec. ____ jxtraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SQNC 3FC Cleanup: (Y/N) N__ pH: 7.O Lab Sample ID: S0612-B1 Lab File ID: A1129 Date Received: O6/OS/89 Date Extracted: 06/.12/89 Date Analysed: 06/19/89 Dilution Factor: 1.OO I :AG ?-'n. COMPOUND (uq/L or uq/Kq) UE/K5 99-09-"7' ———————— 3-Nitroani 1 ine 83-32-9 ———————— AcenaDhther.e 51-28-5 ———————— 2, 4-Dinitro phenol 100-02-7 ——————— 4-Nitrophenol 132—64-9 ——————— Dibenzof uran 121-14-2 ——————— 2.4-Dinitrctcluene 34-66-2 ———————— Diethvlph thai ate 7005-72-3 —————— 4-Chlorqphenyl-phenylether __ 86-73-7 ———————— Fluorene 100-10-6 ——————— 4-Nitroaniline 534-52-1 —— - ———— 4.6-Dinitro-2-Methylchenol 86—30—6 ———————— W-Ni trosodipheny lamine ( 1 ) 1 0 i - 5 5-3 ——————— 4-Bromophen y 1 -phen v 1 e t her 1 1 G-74-i ——————— hexachlcrobenzene G7- F-::-- 1:-- — ——— — —Pen t af hi or a phen ci S5-O1-5 ———————— Phenanthrene 84-74-^ ———————— Di-n-Butvlphthalate 206-44-O ——————— Fluoranthene 129-00-0 ——————— Pyrene 85-63-7- ———— —— Bu tv 1 ben zylph thai ate '?: -9--1 - ————— • —— -3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine 56-55-3 —— -• ———— Eenzo(a) Anthracene 218-01-9 ——————— Chrysene 117-81-7- —————— bis(2-Ethylhexyl )Fh thai ate __ 117-84-0 ——————— Di-n-Octvl Ph thai ate 205-99-2 ——— - ——— Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 207-OS-9 ——————— Benzo( k )Fluoranthene 50-32-8- ——————— Benzo (a ) Pyrene 1^3-39-5 ——————— Indenod, 2, 3-cd) Pyrene !;3- / . -;.-- —————— Di ben z ( a , h ) An thracene 191 -~~4-'T' ——————— E;f=nzo ( a , h , i )Pervlene 1600 330 160O 1600 330 33O 330 330 330 1.600 160O 330 330 330 1600 33O 330 330 330 330 33O 660 33O 33O 330 330 330 33O 330 330 330 :u :u !U :u I L> :u ;u :u :u :u i i i i i.-i i t • i •— ' 1 i i t t»> :u !U :u :u !U !U !U :u :u •u i 716 ;...nnc.t be separated from Diphenylamine FORK I SV-2 2- TUT 001 0413 T V T i i *-i; r -r - i r- r-\<r-• r*- r *-. \ •* r- r-- ,--. i, t /•, i -. / r- r r*~ T^ ^ -T- A r--1 i r~ |— •— . i I t v ..JL-f-i I j U.I..1 •_'!-*.. _3f-; ••; .1 L_-_» !" I-4 ML.. T O J. :2 L. I-! i M CD I'.!_ L- i SPA SAMPLE NO. SBLKOI I h Name: C1IMIC CCRP L&b Cods: CCIMK Case No.: 12053 Contract: 68590028 !_________ SAG No.s ______ SDG. No.: DT747 Matrix: (soil/water) SCTL Sample wt/val: 30,0 (g/ml_) G___ Level: (low/ned) LCW % Moisture: not dec. __0_ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Scnc) SCNC GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N__ pH: __.7«_0_ CAS rc. Lab Sample ID: S0612-B1 Lab File ID: A1129 Date Received: O6/08/89 Date Extracted: 06/12/89 Date Analysed: 06/19/89 Dilution Factor: 1.00 I CONCENTRATION UNITS; (ug/L =r ug/Kg) UG/K3 ^_-l— • ?. ^ 111-44-4 — - 541-73-1 — - 106-46-7 — • 100-51-6 — • 95-48-7 —— • 39633-32-9- 106-44-5 — • 621- 64-7- — 67-72-1 — - 105-67-9 — 65-E5-C —— JL _ .*. / j. j. 120-83-2 — 120-82-1 — 1C6-47-S — 87-68-3 —— -?-T f!^ /* // *+, ^ 88-06-2 —— ————— Phenol ———— Tbis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether ———— 2-Chlorophenol ————— l,3-3ichiorobenzene 1,4 Dit_hlorcbenzene ————— Benzyl Alcohol ————— 1,2-Dichlcrobenzene ————— 2-Methvlohenol ————— bi=(2-Chloroisopropy])Ether _ "^ ' » %z '* ,# y ^ ^ t * =^r i : O i ————— N-Nitros = -Di-n-Prcpylar.iinE ——— — Hexi-.chlcroethane 5^ ^ ^ _ ^ ^ # _ = = ^ __ _ ^ —— _ — Isz-shsrone - ———— 2-^itrop-enol ————— 2,^-Dir.ethylphenol - ———— Psnzoic Acid ————— bis(2-Chlorosthcxv)Methane ————— 2.4-Dichlorophenol ————— l,2,4-Tri.-hlorobenzene ————— r^azhthalene — . —— -4-Chlcrcsr.ilir:e ————— Hcxachlcrobutadiene ————— 4-Chlcro-3-Methylphenol - ———— 2-Mzthyjnaphthalene Hexachlcr^cyclopentadi^ne —— . —— 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 ———————— 2,4,5-Tri.chlorophenol 91-58-7 —— 88-74-4 —— 131-M-3— 606-20-2 — ————— 2-Chloronaphthalene ————— 2-:Vitrcar,iline _ _ _ T^^_^j_^..T ^. l*j.&_*1_*.^ —— — — — - ^ . .. C; v i i \ i r i i 1.1 :«.& j. &• *_u; — - ——— Accr.&^hthylene —— —— -2*fr-2initrctoluene 330 330 3-J..U 330 330 330 330 330 330 33 U 330 J" J* - * 330 J\7\O •_• !• L' 330 1600 330 330 33O 330 330 530 330 330 330 330 1600 330 1600 730 230 330 i — r-*"n T f^i. ^ rCifM. i 3.— 1. * IU I I I 1 LJ i i . i L.' :u IU :u IU :y IU t LJ :u IU : u : * * !U I'J t t-f :u IU :u :u :u :U :u i * * : *J :u IU i i * i ** IU * i * : w? •IU '^15 ^A1 0414 of TUT ? /N M C' I IT n r-* < Hi ir l_t. i<t_i . r~. r~. r—• /-- i- i T r-- r* r. i. i A I »_-rvor-:IMJ S_-O nl*<|-ll GBLKOl *... t- 4- n- - — •*- « - CD 11 •_ f o. L_ .1 ase No.: 120=8 30.O (g/n^L) G i^-fcure: r^ct: dec. i_ ?D3 r-'o. : EX97S ID: S0612-B1 A1129 dec . _____ Extraction; (SepF/Cont/Sanc) SGNC GPC Cleanup: CY/.N) N__ pH: 7.0 CAS \'C-. COMPOUND Date Received: OA/08/39 Date Extracted: 06/12XB9 Cate Analyzed: 06/19/89 Dilution Fs.ctcr: 1.00 . CONCENTRATION UNITS; (uq/L cr ug/Kc) US/K5 Q T--OV-.- ———————— 3— Nit ream line 23-32-? ——— - ———— Acenaphthene 51-^2 5- — 2, 4-£initrophenQl 1C 0-02-7 ——————— 4-Nitrophenol 132-64—9 —————— — Dibenro-furan 121-1-^-2 ——————— 2,4— Dinitro toluene S4-66-2 ———————— Diethylphthalate 700 = -72-.i —————— 4-Chlorophenyl-phsnyl ether E't- 73-7 — —————— Fluorene •00-1O-6 ——————— 4-Ni troani line r-74-52-1 —— -- ——— 4,6-Dinitro-2-rt5thylphGriol __ C6 .:•'.• h N Nitrosodiphenvl smine (1) iOl j-s -• - 4 Bromuphenyl—pheny] ether 1 13-74".-. -- —— —— He xac hi aro benzene D7-?:/.- -^ ———— ——— Pen tact".], orophenol o^.-01-S ———————— Phensnthrene . 120-12-7 ——————— Anthracene 34-74-2- ——————— Di-n-Butvlchthalate 206- 44— O — - ———— Fluoran tnene 129-CO-O ——————— Pyrene S3-- 63-7- —— -- ———— Butyl benzyl ph thai ate ? .1-94 -I ———————— 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ?6-S::.— 3 ———————— Benzo(a) Anthracene 2 IS- 01-*? ———— : —— Chrysene il7-cl-7 ——————— bis ( 2-Ethyl hexy 1 }Ph thai ate __ 117--' 4-0 ——————— Di-n-Octvl Phthalate 20^—99-2 ——————— Een2o(b)FlLioranther.e 207-03— *=? ——————— Ben so ( If. ) Fluoran thene ?'-.:-•.. ,..:- £ ——— ———— Benzo ( a ) Pyrene l?...-3v-!:. — - ———— Indeno(1.2.3-cd)Pvrene f-Z- •"0-3- •—- ———— Diben2< a, h) Anthracene l':"l-2-T-2- —— — —— Benzo (.q , h , i ) Pery lene : it oo 730 i£00 It 00 330 330 330 330 1600 Id 00 330 330 330 liOO 3 3 O 330 330 330 330 330 66O 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 33>.> !U i i i • '_* ;u !'J :u :u :u • I I 1 W 1 1 1 1 A—' :u :u ;u !U :u : j :u < i i i w :u !U iU !U !'J !U !U :u :u ;-j !U :u :u ;u :u i (1) - 'Iar.-ct te separated from Dipheny lamine FORM I EV-2 TUT 001 0415 f I ;..AT:LET ::"^'.r- — - -:'.:r-L.vr:r r V,"A -I-TET •-•:-'•! !•••-•' -.' *_- i— i . -• rf . r ;;. ; /...v.'ir.-r ; L- 2 I ;.. ": e >-,t/\ c;'. "0-0 '. .;/.iiL) . Live: \ ' I.X . Lab Fi le ID: {HULL Date Received: PC r. net dec. .__0 dec. (SepF/Cont/Sc-c.) leanup: (Y/N) N__ pH: Date Extracted: -:•£/13/39 D a t e A n s i y zed: 06/23/t39 Diluticn F.;.c:tor: .1 ,0"- CCNCEUTRATICN UNITS: (!.;q/L cr ug/Kq; I 1 • t : : ! ! i : i i • '• • < > '. i » : i1 •• i1 ; i » i t : i i 1 ; ; ; ; 1 -:.S-9=--2 ——— — - — F ^ (=r>c. i ^ 11-,; .'.-..:-- ———— ••— bis(2-3hlcr-c~thvl iEther r>'3- = 7 E;-- — — -•-— 2~Ch]crcr h-nol r>41-73--l- —————— i,3-n-icr.3crcber.2er:e l-.:o--s6-/ ———— - —— A , 4 -Die h;s re benzene ICO-^l-t — -- ———— Benzyl Alcohol 95--50-1— — ————— l,2-DichlGrrb&nrene 95-^-7- ——— — •— 2 -Methyl phenol 3-9633-32-9 — - —— fcis(2-tTh:oroisoprcpyl ) Ether 106-^^-5— — - —— 4-Me thy 1 phenol 621-4:^-7 — ————— N-N:..troEC-Di-r:"P;-opylo..T,i-e __ 67-72-1 ————— - —— -'Hexschloraethsns -G -7 5- 3— -• —————— ivitrrben-c-s 7E-1:-;-!--- —— -- - -I ^opharcnG S3-----V- — — • — ----- -N; trr-l-^nc] ICT.-;:---^--- -•-— -----2, -"-3i.7iethvl^h£--r.;:, 65-85-0----- ——— --Eenncic -cid li 1-^1-1- —— - —— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Me thane __ 120-G3-2 —————— -2.4-Dichjcrcrhencl 120-32-1—- — —— l,2,4-Trichlsr=ber,2cr.e 91--2>-3— — —— — -Uaphthalene i06-i"-r-.--— ••— -4-Chl=rca,-,iline 37 -61— 3- — — ----- — •H::.;c.chlcr-cSut£.diGne 59-50--- ———— —— 4-C hi oro-3-Me thy l phenol 91-=. -i ———————— 7-Methvl-a.i=hthale?ne 77-47 -/:-- — - —— -Hsxachlorocyc la pen tsdier-e ___ SE-06--2-- ——————— 2,4,6-Trichlorcphenol 95-r~5— r —————— -—2.4, 5-Trichloraphencl QI--C- 7- ----- -- — T-Chlc-c-nphthGle-e i-"— . — *• .,.- i ! j. •..: _ i., ! j. ~ .-i :(-: 13'.-:.: -3—- —— - — ri.T.Tthyl ^hths-.l? t=- 20G--9,1--S- ——— ----- Act-r-^phtrv,- l.^ne 606-::i: -2- ------ -2, 6--I-i.-,i trctoluer.E t ! : . I 1 l ! I l 1 i 1 '. : : ! : i ! i T ; ; ! ! f i ! ; ! i l ! 1 , ; ! , i ; t : 330 .. -_' '.' ~ — .-. 330 330 330 330 330 330 ' 330 -T-T,-, —— T- .-. •- •-• -' _- •_• .- -T-T - .-• _• - 33': 330 :. L oo _•'_- 330 _ _••..• T-Tf-j 330 T T, •-• •_• _' -' 3..0 330 330 1600 330 1600 330 T -* »"-. -..•-' •-' 730 . t • 1 '— ' - J : : l ; «..; : -.j i _ :L; i'J :u ::j :u !U :u •LJ : 1 • ;u ! L! :u !U i LJ !U : J :u 1 LJ :u :u :u :u :U 1 ! . i-J :u 5U ;U ; I FORM I •'.'-:. TUT OO1 0416 rist: 651:90029 ' - r— r~. A r" <• i-.: r*. i r~ h • r^ nr M Sr-irir i-IT NO . i ! E5LKC2 f~- T^- r*» i : _ . T-. •-.* f1. ~m £' *_•' IT i ;LJ • I *-' /-. . •• i-'1 ID; SO&13-D1_____ Lab File ID: Late Received: '•: !"!c-isturc:-: ~.Dt rite. Q dec. -;tractior,j (SepF/Cent/Senc) SGNC '•C Clesr.upi (Y/N) N__ pH: 7.0 Date Extracted: Cfc/13/ Analysed: O^/23/ Diluticn Factsrr: 1 . 00 I CGNCENTRATICN U^TTS: (ug/L DT ug/Kc) !.JG/i rnr_ b'.-' c •• >..' J. ^_ • N. i -L— i 2^ — 700 3c- 1 0 0 r. -T ^» 36- 1 '.' i •3 5 - 120 f\ f\ •_ *••• ~ Z' •"- •' 129 ^-. — c? •* IT f 21C 4 4 - 7 a ^- / -i. .* / -; 0 5 -v-)7 ^"- r « ... ... 7 -_ 3'~-'- :-. •.'! ". •;•- 2 -- ——————— 3- Mi trcani i ine •2-r —————— — A-er.aphthene 22- - = -. --- ———— 2, fl-Tiinitrsphencl -02-7 ——————— 4-Nitrophenol -£,4-n;._.- ————— Dibenrc-furan - 1 4-2- —————— 2 , A-Dinitrotcluene -.6-2- ———————— Diethylptrthals-te 3-72-3- ————— 4-Chlorephenvl-enenvlether 77 -.y — ._._-.. ——— Fluor ene ---..-.'--6- —————— 4-Ni troaniline -52-1- ———— — 4 , 6-Dini tro-2-Methy 1 phencl .-••-• e - N Nitrcsodiphenylamine ^1) __ ._ - T 3-3--- ————— 4-Bromcphenyl— phenylether ___ -74 ••• 1 - —————— He x ac h 1 oroben zene : ;: ~ - —————————— h'-iH tEC.-.l OTCpfiSnO 1 '." 1—3- — — ——— — Phen s.n tr.rene - 12 -7-- — -•• ——— Anthracene 7C-2- ———————— Di-n-ButvlBhthslste -4^-0- —————— Fluorsntnene -00- 0- —————— Pyrene f cL-7 - - - - — - —— Buty I ber. z y 1 p 1~. t ha 1 a te 74-1 — -__.__ — - (3> -Dichlorcbsr, zidine 13-3- - — •-- ——— Benro( a) Anthracene -01-9 —— ---' ——— Chrysene ...21-7- — - —— -Dis(2-Ethyihexyl }Phthalate -54-0- — - ——— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate -99- 2- —— ——— Ben ~o ( b ) F 1 ucran t hene -OS-9 ———— - —— 5enzc(k )Fluoranthene 32- - —— -- ——— DenzD< a ) Pyrene -o9-5 ——————— Indenc( 1 , 2,3-cd ) Pyrene . '. -._.- — - ----- —— Jibcnr (a s hJwnthracEne -2 - - "'• ----- ——— Benzc ( q . h,i )Perylene 1600 ~T("^;^-_ < ^ r» ^-. _^ *_• . _• 1600 330 330 33O 330 330 1600 1600 330 330 330 1 L 0 0 ~\"\:~» 33 y 33O 330 330 T 7 •'"' 660 330 330 330 330 330 330 33O • ..30 330 330 i J i i 1 1 1 ! ; 'J < « f • «_j i <_i vj :u :u :u i i i !U :u . ! U ! 'J ! J :u ;u !LJ t * t i'J : J :u !U 1U !LS ;u !U :u i t t 1 W ! U ; frcm Diphenyiamine FORM T BV-2 TUT 00.1. 0417 1/87 Rev. I \^ ATTACHMENT 1 I SOP NO. BW-6 PAGE OP TOTAL REVIEW < CLP DATA ASSESSMENT i • Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Organic Analysis 1 Case No. 12058 SDG No. BX258 & BX260 LABORATORY COHPUCHEHN SITE TUTU < \ DATA ASSESSMENT: The current functional guidelines (1988) for evaluating organic data have been • applied. All data are valid and acceptable except those analytes which have been qualified vith a "J" (estimated), "U" ( non-detects), "R" (unusable), or "JN" I (presumptive evidence for the presence of the material at an estimated value). All action is detailed on the attached sheets. ^ Two facts should be noted by all data users. First, the "R" flag means that the I associated value is unusable. In other words, due to significant QC problems I the analysis is invalid and provides no information as to whether the compound • is present or not. "R" values should not appear on data tables because they cannot be relies upon, even as a last resort. The second fact to keep in mind ] is that no compound concentration, even if it has passed all QC tests, is j guaranteed to be accurate. Strict QC serves to increase confidence in data but any value potentially contains error. Reviewer's tf.'.'.v .// ^ / i / / V/7" Signature:___ ~ -• - f ' * ,-Z-/19^ Verified By: / "^ i ~^a5C/<-' Date I I I I 1 i i I I I I I ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE OF SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 4. CALIBRATION: Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to ensure that the instrument is capable •£ producing acceptable quantitative data. An initial calibration demonstrates that the instrument is capable of giving acceptable performance at the beginning of an experimental sequence. The continuing calibration checks document that the instrument is giving satisfactory daily performance. A) RESPONSE FACTOR: The response factor measures the instrument's response to specific chemical compounds. The response factor for the Target Compound List (TCL) must be > 0.05 in both the initial and continuing calibrations. A value < 0.05 indicates a serious detection and quantitation problem (poor sensitivity). Analytes detected in the sample vill be qualified as estimated, "J". All non-detects for that compound vill be rejected, "R". 2-Butanone was rejected in samples BY705, BY707, BY709, BY711, BY712, and BY713. TUT 001 0419 I I I ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE OF SOP NO. HW-6 —— " DATA ASSESSMENT: 5. CALIBRATION: A) PERCENT RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION (ZRSD) AND PERCENT DIFFERENCE (ZD): Percent RSD is calculated from the initial calibration and is used to indicate the stability of the specific compound response factor over increasing concentration. Percent D compares the response factor of the continuing calibration check to the mean response factor (RRF) from the initial calibration. Percent D is a measure of the instrument's daily performance. Percent RSD most be OOZ and ZD must be <25Z. A value outside of/*«se limits indicates potential detection and quantitation errors. For these --.*asons, all positive results are flagged as estimated, "J" and non-detects are flagged "UJ" (if ZD or RSD >SOZ). If there is a cross deviation of ZRSD and ZD, the non-detects may be rejected, *R*. For the PCB/PESTICIDB fraction, ZRSD for aldrin, endrin, DOT, and dibutylchlorendate must not exceed 10Z. Percent D must be vithia 1SZ on the quantitation column and 20Z on the confirmation column. VOA The following analytes vere qualified for high ZD results: 1,1,2 Trichloroethane vas rejected in sample BX258, and qualified "UJ" in samples BY772, BY773, and BY775. Chloroethane vas qualified "UJ" in samples BY769, BX994, BX979, BX981, and BY774. Chloromethane vas qualified "UJ" in samples BY772, BY773, BY775, BX994, BX979, 3X981. Tetrachloroethene vas qualified "J" in sample BZ258, and "UJ" in samples BY769, BY774, BY772, BY773, and BY775. Bromofora vas qualified "UJ" in'samples BY772, BY773, and BY775. Acetone vas qualified "J" in samples BY772, and BY775; "UJ" in samples BY774, and BT769; and rejected in sample BY773. Acetone in samples BY701, BY763, BY768, and BX259 vere qualified "J" due to high ZD results. Acetone in sample BY769 vas also qualified "u" for method blank contamination. ZD values vere high for 4 Methyl 2 Pentanone but this vas previously qualified for surrogate recoveries. Methylene Chloride in sample BX259 vas flagged "J" due to RSD values. Acetone in BY768 did not meet QC requirement for ZD but vas already qualified due to high RSD results in sample fBX991. BNA The following analytes are qualified for high ZD results: 3,3 Dichlorobenzldine was flagged "OJ" in samples BX260, BX979, BY758, BY762, and BY261. 4 Nitrophenol vas flagged "UJ" in samples BX994, BY75B, BY762, and TUT 001 0420 17 REFERENCE NO. 8 CONTINUED flJT OOl O421 i I I I I I I I I BY261. Diethylphthalate vas flagged "UJ" in samples BX995RE, BY763, BY768, and BY761. Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether vas rejected in samples BY701, BY762, BY758 and BY261. Benzoic Acid vas flagged "UJ" in samples BY701, BY761, BY763, and BY768. 3 Nitroaniline vas rejected in sample BX994. . Bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether vas flagged "UJ" in sample BY701. N-Nitroso Di-n-Propylamine vas flagged "UJ" in sample BY701. Hexachlorobenzene vas flagged "UJ* in sample BY758, BY762 and BY261. Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate vas flagged "J" in samples BY761t BY768, BY258, and BY2S9. Benzoic Acid in sample tBX995RE also failed QC requirements but vas previously rejected for surrogate recovery. PAGE OP SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 6. SURROGATES: All samples are spiked with surrogate compounds prior to sample preparation to evaluate overall laboratory performance and efficiency of the analytical technique. If the measured surrogate concentrations vere outside contract specifications, qualifications vere applied to the samples and analytes as shovn belov. BNA The acid fraction in sample BX995RE vas rejected. VOA 4Methyl-2-Pentanone vas qualified as "J" estimated, and all the other analytes qualified as "UJ" in sample BX991. 3"> TUT 001 ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE OF SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 7. INTERNAL STANDARDS PERFORMANCE r Internal standard (IS) performance criteria ensure that the GC/MS sensitivity and response are stable during every experimental run. The internal standard area count Bust not vary by more than a factor of 2 (-50Z to +100Z) fro* the associated continuing calibration standard. The retention time of the internal standard mist not vary more than +30 seconds from the associated continuing calibration standard. If the area count is outside the (-50Z to +100Z) range of the associated standard, all of the positive results for compounds quantitated using that IS are qualified as estimated, "J", and all non-detects as "UJ" or "R* if there is a severe loss of sensitivity. » If an internal standard retention time varies by more than 30 seconds, the reviewer will use professional judgnent to determine either partial or total rejection of the data for that sample fraction. VGA 2 Hexanone, 4 Methyl-2-Pentanone, Tetrachloroethene, 1,1,2,2,Tetrachloroethane, Toluene, Chlorobenzene, Ethylbenzene, Styrene, and Xylene the internal standard area count falls outside the QC range, no action was taken because these analytes were previously qualified for poor surrogate recoveries in sample BX991. 431. ™T °01 °423 I I i I I 1 L I ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE__OF SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 8. COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION: A) VOLATILE AND SEMI-VOLATILE FRACTIONS: TCL compounds are identified on the GC/MS by using the analyte's relative retention time (RRT) and by comparison to the ion spectra obtained fro* known standards. For the results to be a positive hit, the sample peak mist be within ±0.06 RRT units of the standard compound and have an ion spectrum which has a ratio of the primary and secondary n/e intensities within 20Z of that in the standard compound. For the tentatively identified compounds (TIC) the ion spectra must match accurately. In the cases in which there is not and adequate ion spectrum ^match, the laboratory may have provided false positive identification. B) PESTICIDE FRACTION: The retention times of reported compounds must fall within the calculated ( retention time windows for the two chromatographic columns and a GC/MS confirmation is required if the concentration exceeds 10 ng/ml in the final sample extract. BNA Phenol in sample BX258 was flagged "JN" due to inadequate spectral match. The aldol products (TIC) in samples BX258, BX259, BX261 were rejected. Two VOA TCL identified as TIC's were rejected in sample BXC761. All TIC compound results (VOA and BNA) are flagged "J" (estimated), and also "N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of the compound) if an identification is made, to reflect the qualitative and quantitative error inherent in the analysis of compounds without corresponding calibration standards. Tu'>' on* -°424 I t I 1 1 I i I 1 ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE OP SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 9. MATRIX SPIKE/SPIKE DUPLICATE, MS/MSD: The MS/MSD data are generated to determine the long-term precision and accuracy of the analytical method in various matrices. The MS/MSD may be used in conjunction vith other QC criteria for some additional qualification of the data. VGA Poor matrix spike recoveries vere obtained for the VGA fraction. The matrix spike sample (BX259), was diluted by a factor of 6.7. 43i TUT 001 0425 I ATTACHHEHT 1 PACK OP SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 2. BLANK CONTAMINATION: Quality assurance (QA) blanks, i.e., nethod, trip, field, rinse and water blanks are prepared to identify any contamination vhich oay have been introduced into the samples during sample preparation or field activity. Method blanks measure laboratory contamination. Trip blanks measure cross-contamination of samples during shipment. Field blanks measure cross-contamination of samples during field operations. If the concentration of the analyte is less than 5 times the blank contaminant level (10 times for the common contaminants), the analytes in the samples shovn vere qualified vith "U" for these reasons: A) Method blank contamination VOA Acetone in samples BX258, BY702, BY769, BY774. Chloroform in samples BY769, BY772, BY774, BY775. Methylene Chloride in samples BY705,BY707, BY709, BY711, BY712, BY713, BY769, BY772, BY773, BY774, BY775, and BX258. Acetone in sample BY773 vas flagged "J" for field blank contamination, this flag vas superceded by rejection due to calibration results. I BNA Tvo TIC's vere rejected in sample BX258 due to method blank contamination. 1 B) Field or rinse blank contamination ("vater blanks" or "distilled vater blanks" are validated like any other sample) VOA Acetone and Methylene Chloride in sample BY764 vas qualified "u". Acetone in samples BY769, and BY774 vere already qualified for method blank contamination. Methylene Chloride in samples BY772, BY773, BY775, and BY774 also failed QC for field blank, but vas previously qualified for method blank contamination. There vere several field blanks not associated vith any samples. C) Trip blank contamination TUT 001 0426 I I 1 I I 1 I I I ATTACHMENT 1 PACE OP SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 10. OTHER QC DATA OUT OF SPECIFICATION: Sample #764 was received but not listed on Chain of Custody or Traffic Report. Sample #BY761 was listed but not received. Sample 1775 was received with samples collected on 6/9/89 but not listed on the traffic report. The BNA portion of sample By765 was not received by the lab, therefore the analysis was not performed. 11. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND OVERALL ASSESSMENT (continued on next page if necessary): 12. CONTRACT PROBLEMS / HOH-COMPLIANCE: Relative response factors for 2-Butanone were calculated using Bromochloromethane as the internal standard instead of 1,4 Dichlorobenzene. No qualifications were required since the retention time for 2-Butanone was closer to the Bromochloromethane standard. 13. This package contains re-extraction, re-analysis or dilution. Upon revieving the QA results, the following for* I(s) are identified to be used. SEE FORM I's. TUT O01 0427 CASE NO. SDG NO. _ sow__ 5 *T REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ___ LABORATORY "" " •1___ DATA USER ( ^ W ________ REVIEW COMPLETION DATE ^ " 30- NO. OF SAMPLES ''I WATER ^P SOIL ____ OTHER JSc^S, // //?0-f REVIEWER (]ESD I]£SAT [] OTHER, CONTRACT/CONTRACTOR - 1. HOLDING TIMES 2. OC4C TUNE/CC PERFORMANCE 3L JNTTIAL CALIBRATIONS 4. CONTINUING CALIBRATIONS 5. FIELD BLANKS (TP • am applicable) & LABORATORY BLANKS 7. SURROGATES t. MATRIX SPJKEA)UPLICAT£S & REGIONAL QC (-F - am applicable) ia INTERNAL STANDARDS 1L COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION 12. COMPOUND QUANTJTATJDN 13. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 14. OVERALL ASSESSMENT BNA OTHER \J O • No problems or mioor problems thai do aot affect data vsabilitjr. X • No more than about 5% of the data poiats are qualified as either estimated or urasable. M « More thaa about 5% of the data points are qualified as estimated. Z • More thao about 5% of the data poiats are qualified as oavsable. DPO ACTION ITEMS: AREAS OF CONCERN: 276 TUT 001 0428 "•"'• 7" >S! V H -fa 1-0 -0 I In Reference to Case No(s): Contract Laboratory Program REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM Telephone Record Log Date of Call: Laboratory Name: lab Contact: Contact: CalJ Initiated By: ___ Laboratory " Region ————— ' ————— lp reierence to data for the iolJowing sample number(s): Surmnary of Questions /Issues Discussed: (D 'PaCkjX*.. /$ /t//T?//tg, ^?y/n J Summary of Resolution: .T g) Signature Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy *h*n£> Date TUT I GOMPUCHEM LABORATORIES, INC. 03/01/90 Ms. Margo Rezado COM Federal Program Office 40 Rector Street 10th Floor New York. New York 10006 Dear Ms. Rezado; \ i The attached is missing data you requested for Case 12058. '• SDG# BX258 Form VI and missing raw data on Inst. 10 - VOA (PAGES 847A - 847S). \ SDG# BX260 I TIC missing for Sample BY761 (PAGE 1069A). \^ j- Incorrect page in your package for Inst. 06 on 05/01/89 for SSTD160 I (PAGE 897) Please replace this page and the response factors will caculate to the ones given on Form VI. } If I can be of further assistance, please call 919-248-6478. Sincerely; Alice Evans Contract Compliance Coordinator cc: SMO Region II EMSULV TUT OO1 O431 I SOP NO. HW-6 Revision 16 CLP ORGANIC DATA REVIEW AND PREUMBttRy REVIEW -B^vilacqua C Monitoring Management APPROVED BY; Gerard F. McKenna, Qiicf Monitoring Management Branch Date; TUT 001 0432 I STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 3 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 PACKAGE COMPLETENESS AND EELTVERABIZS CASE NUMBER:. IAB:____ 5 05^ ST1E: 1.0 pata CcrDletfin*?*! and De] j / 1.1 Have any missing deliverables been received to the data package. ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittal of any vissing deliverables. If lab cannot provide then, note the effect on review of the package under the "Contract Problens/Oton-ccrpliance11 section of reviewer narrative. i ' -i.. SJD CCS checklist included with package? 2.0 Cover T>tter/C3se Narrative 2.1 Is the Narrative or Cover Letter present? 2.2 Are Case Number and/or SAS number contained in the —• Narrative or Cover Letter? 3.0 Data Validation Checklist The following' checklist is divided into three parts. Part A is filled out if the data package contains any VQA analyses, Part B for any SNA analyses and Part C for Pesticide/PCBs. Does this package contain: VQA data? EWA data? Pesticide/FCB data? ACTION: Ccnplete corresponding parts of checklist. NO N/A w< TUT 001 0433 I SiANUARD OPERATING PROCEDURE: Page: 4 of 35 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 NO N/A PART A: VDA •'"v/ 1.0 Traffic Report^ andlgborattyv Narrative 1.1 Are the Traffic Report Forms present for all samples? ACTICN: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing or illegible copies. 1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any problems with sample receipt, condition of samples, analytical problems or special notations affecting the quality of the data? ACTICN: Use professional judgement to evaluate the »ff»-fc on the quality of the data. ACTICNi If any sanple analyzed as a soil contains more than 50* water, all data should be rejected. ?cr[v> if both VQA vials for a sample have air .buhhles, flag all positive results "J" and all nan -detects "R". -'.0 Holding Tunes ^ 2.1 Have any VQA holding times, determined from date of ~" collection to date of analysis, been exceeded? If unpreserved, aqueous aromatic volatiles must be analyzed within 7 days of collection and non-arcnatic volatiles mist be analyzed within 14 days. If preserved with hydrochloric acid and stored at 4°C, then both aromatic and non-aromatic volatiles must be analyzed within 14 days. If uncertain about preservation, contact the sampler to determine whether the samples were preserved. A ten-day holding tire for soil samples is xm.a tiniinnded. T?Hle of Holding Time "ViolirtiynS (See Traffic Report) Sanple Date Date Lab Date Sample Matrix Preserved ? Sampled Received Analyzed ACTION: If holding times are exceeded, flag all positive results as estimated ("J") and sample quantitation limits as estimated ("UT"), and document in the narrative that holding tiu*~ were exceeded. TUT UO1 O434 I STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 5 of ~ 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A If analyses were done more than 14 days beyond holding tine, either on the first analysis or upon reanalysis, the reviewer oust use professional judgement to determine the reliability of the data and the effects of additional storage on the sample results. Ihe reviewer may determine that non-detect data are unusable ("R") . 3.0 Surrogate Recovery fForm 3.1 Are the VGA Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II) present for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water ftXl __ __ b. Med Water [ __ 3 c. Low Soil d. Med Soil FvXl __ __ j.l' Are all the VOA samples listed on the appropriate Surrogate Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrices: a. Tr-fj water b. Med Water c. Low Soil d. Med Soil ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittals. If missing deliverables are unavailable, document effect on data under "Conclusions" section of reviewer narrative. 3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? [±IJ __ __ ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. 3.4 Was one or more VGA surrogate recovery outside of contract specifications for any sample or method blank? If yes, were samples reanalyzed? '•'• Were method blanks reanalyzed? ACTION: If surrogate recoveries are > 10% but all do not meet SOW specifications: 1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J") . 2. Flag all non-detects as estimated detection limits ("UJ"). TUT OO1 0435 « I SIW3ERRD CREMATING PROCEHJRE Page: 6 Of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A If any surrogate has a recovery of <10% : 1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J"). 2. Flag all nan-detects as unusable ("R"). Professional judgement should be used to qualify data that have method blank surrogate recoveries out of specification in both original and re- analyses. Check the internal standard areas. 3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw data and Form II? __ __ AcnCK: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". * Matrix Strikes (Form III) 4.1 is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III) /* I±_3 — — 1 4.2 Here matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency for each of the following matrices: I a. Low Water b. Med Water [__1 __ ! c. Low Soil d. Med Soil ACTICN: If any matrix spike data are missing, take the action specified in 3.2 above. 4.3 How many VCA spike recoveries are outside QC limits? Water Sails 3 out Of lOftG&JicO 0 out Of 10 [ \/\ __ __ 4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spike and matrix spike p$ duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits? ^ Water Soils o out of 5(s>fcafco) V out of sftftf Sj>6*&) '• c/6 ACTICN: If MS and MSD both have less than 10% re- covery for an analyte, negative results for that analyte should be rejected, and positive results should be flagged "J". Hie above applies only to the sample used TUT 001 0436 for the MS/MSD analysis. Use professional judgement in applying this criterion to other earrw-iloc < I STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 7 . Of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A~ 5.0 Blanks (Form IV) 5.1 Is the Method Blank Summary (Form IV) present? 5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of VGA TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil, medium soil), whichever is more frequent? [ W<l __ 5.3 Has a VGA instrument blank been analyzed at least /^^ once every twelve hours for each GC/WS system used? \Y 1 __ __ ACTION: If any method blank data are missing, call lab for explanation / resutmittal. If not available, reject all associated positive data ("R"). 5.4 Chromatography: review the blank raw data - chromatograms (Rirs), quant reports or data system printouts and spectra. Is the chromatographic performance (baseline stability) for each instrument acceptable for VGAs? ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the effect on the data. 6.0 Contamination NOTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are validated like any other sample and are not used to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the other QC blanks discussed below. 6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive results (TCL and/or TIC) for VGAs? When applied as described below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution Factor. ^_ I__1 __ 6.2 Do any field/trip/rinse blanks have positive VGA results (TCL and/or TIC)? ACTION: Prepare a list of the samples associated with each of the contaminated blanks. (Attach a separate sheet.) NOTE: Only field/rinse blanks taken the same day as the samples are used to qualify data. Trip blanks are used to qualify only those samples ^ with which they were shipped. Blanks may not be qualified because of contamination in another blank. Blanks may be qualified for surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems. TUT 001 0437 CISAHICS BLANC CCNTAMIHATICNt SITE: LAB: - •;';,. FRACTION: I'd'A" ANAITTES TCL Mf-Cl- &UOU. ?\ *. ^t**(.'Si; y^\ '^ 1^ v/ TIC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 AFFECTED SAMPLES (HETHC9 SLAHC CONTAMINATIONS &L< K'1 AMOUNT ^r^ * X ^ & i. **•**••» • V^/c v / r ;• AMOUNT ^^C- *' i *^f . — ... 10 ___ , AMOUNT .- .,. /'*>/ 1 ? . i.* ''' ^•?:-7^ ...1:1." ........ -r .v> v ^V;- AMOUNT . J» J/^, , • ftfro? ........ «+W»e BLANK CCUT. «:. ^ ^ AMOUNT / *-> *7j^. 6JC?^.• NO: AMOUNT ,'[ **>lk \0'1> ?<ni z "77? tfttP- BLANC CCNT. | NO: AMOUNT 7^i r »T ''l/ J I 1 1 J im/ f^^ ' t - 6/77? u* NO: _ j AMOUNT | I^/L\ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TUT OO1 O43S CSSAH1CS ILAHS CtHTAMINATICNS cut* LAB: tt"***1 «ACTIC«: ' «-'*'*' IMETKCD >UNC CCNTA/ ANALTT£S TCL 10 AMOUNT AMOLKT AMOUNT AMOUItT 8IMSE BLANK CCNT. AMOUNT AMOUNT tut* BLANK CCNT. j AMOUNT AMOUNT | '% 3 0% J M // I TIC Z 4 .-• T>. •«,<•«-. - AfFECTED SAMPLES .?.?£. ^ u.i. .7.°.7. -7/ •43 TUT 01 0440 0 a «i ar: 5 i i c-j 57 v l IU HI 35 H "H •• jI i Si V :> J i 8 i/; >»^» O I •• I s;i if i T< d- j -. j ~j—4—. ___L «*: kr V^l, j c, i _ , _ i _ ; __ -U I STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDUKh; Page: 8 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest value from all the associated blanks. {Sample cone > CRQLjSample cone < CRQL &jSample cone > CRQL but < lOx blank is < lOx blank value value & >10x blank value Methylene chloride Flag sanple result Reject sanple result No qualification I Acetone with a 'U1; cross and report CRQL; is needed Toluene out 'B' flag cross out 'B' flag _____2-butanone_!____________!_____________!___________ {Sanple cone > CRQLjSaaple cone < CRQL 6!Sanple cone > CRQL but < 5x blank jis < 5x blank value value 6 > 5 blank value Other JFlag sample result!Reject sanple result No qualification Contaminants with a 'U'; cross and report CRQL; is needed out 'B' flag cross out 'B1 flag i ____________ i _____________ i ACTION: For TIC canpounds, if the concentration in the sanple is less than five tunes the concentration in the most con- taminated associated blank, flag the sample data "R" (unusable) . 6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every sasple? ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that there is no associated f ield/rinse/equipment blank. •Deception: samples taken from a drinking water tap do not have associated field blanks. 7.0 GC/K5 Tuning and frfa^s f^literation (Form V) 7.1 Are the GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration Forms (Form V) present for Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)? 7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge (m/z) listing for the BFB provided for each twelve ' hour shift? 7.3 Has a tuning performance compound been analyzed for every twelve hours of sample analysis per instrument? . r ^1 __ __ ACTION: If any tuning data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ACTION: List date, time, instrument ID, and sanple analyses for which no associated GC/MS tuning data are available. TUT OO1 O441 I SIANDARD OPERATING EROCLUUKfc Page: 9 . of . 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES ND N/A ——— -- - - -. ALM'ICW: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration interval. 7.4 Have the ion abundance criteria been met for each instrument used? ACTICN: List all data which do not meet ion abunda criteria (attach a separate sheet). ACTION: If tuning calibration is in error, flag all associated sample data as unusable ("R"). However, if expanded Ion criteria are met (See 1988 Functional Guidelines), the data reviewer may accept data with appropriate qualifiers. 7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors between mass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least two values but if eirurs are found, check more.) 7.6 Have the appropriate number of significant figures (two) been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors are found check more values.) ACIICN: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make necessary con actions and note errors under "Conclusions". 7.7 Are the spectra of the mass calibration compound acceptable? ACTICN: Use professional judgement to determine whether associated data should be 8.0 accepted, qualified, or rejected. jrri List frm Arwlvtes 8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I VGA) present with required header information on each page, for each of the following: a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike rtiiplicatfs c. Blanks 2 op <= 133 TUT 001 0442 1 Ir i i i STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 8.2 Are the VGA Reconstructed Ion Chroma tograms, the mass spectra for the identified compounds, and the data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in the sample package for each of the following? a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates (Mass spectra not required) c. Blanks ACTION: If any data are missing, take action soecified in 3.2 above. Page: 10 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A f^.r _ _ t±j" __ __ i I 8.3 Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report? 8.4 Is chromatographic performance acceptable with respect to: Baseline stability L_klJ _ __ Resolution Peak shape Full-scale graph (attenuation) Lk^J __ __ Other:______ ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the acceptability of the data. 8.5 Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the ./ identified VGA conpounds present for each sample? Q^J __ __ ACTION: If any mass spectra are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. If lab does not generate their own standard spectra, make note in "Contract Probleros/Non-compliance'1. 8.6 Is the RRT of each reported compound within 0.06 RRT / units of the standard RRT in the continuing calibration? T 1/1 __ __ 8.7 Are all ions present in the standard mass spectrum at a relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the sample mass spectrum? 8.8 Do sample and standard relative ion intensities agree / within 20%? r ixf __ __ ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine acceptability of data. If it is determined that incorrect identifications were made, all such data should be rejected, flagged "N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of the compound) or changed to not detected (at the calculated detection limit). r TUT 001 0443 erf IUT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE • - Page: 11 of 36 Date: March 1989 - Revision 6 YES NO N/A .0 Tentatively Identifig'j Concoury^g fTIC) 9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Fora I, Part B) present; and do listed TICS include scan number or retention time, estimated concentration and "J" ^ qualifier? f Un __ __ 9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified compounds and *ce/'y'iat**1 "best natch" spectra included in the sample package for each of the following: a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate f v^l __ __ b. Blanks \ tXl __ __ ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ACTION: Add "J" qualifier if missing and "N" qualifier to all identified TIC compounds on Form I, Part B. j.. Are any TCL compounds (fren any fraction) listed as TIC compounds (example: 1,2-dijnethyUbenzene is xylene — a VQA TCL— and should not be reported as a TIC)? ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC. 9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the sample mass spectrum? 9.5 Do TIC and "best match'1 standard relative ion intensities agree within 20%? ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine acceptability of TIC identifications. If it is determined that an incorrect identi- fication was made, change identification to "unknown" or to some less specific identi- fication (example: "C3 substituted benzene") as appropriate. 10.0 Cotinjound Ou^TTfci+'^tion and Report^ Detection Limit*!? 10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in Form I results? Check at least two positive values. Verify that the correct internal standard, quantitation ion, and RRF were used to calculate Fora I result. Were any errors found? 10.2 Are the CRQIs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions ^ and, for soils, sample moisture? * [ __ ] —— <£ TUT 001 0444 I STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 12 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions11. ACTION: When a sample is analyzed at more than one dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis). Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration range in the original analysis by crossing out the "E" value on the original Form I and substi- tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted sample. Specify which Form I is to be used, then draw a red "X" across the entire page of all Form I's that should not be used, including any in the summary package. il.-j Standards Data U.1 Are the Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, and data system printouts (Quant. Reports) present for initial and continuing calibration? ACTION: If any calibration standard data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. GC/MS Initial Calibration (Form VT) 12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present and complete for the volatile fraction? ACTION: If any calibration standard forms are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. 12.2 Are response factors stable for volatiles over the concentration range of the calibration (RSD <30%)? ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: When RSD >30%, nan-detects may be qualified using professional judgement. Flag all positive results "J". When RSD >90%, flag all non-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region II policy.) 12.3 Do any compounds have a RRF < 0.05? ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: If any volatile compound has an average RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that compound as estimated ("J"), and flag non- detects for that cuin-omiJ as unusable ("R"). ~'1/ *» <: / ce, . _ • TUT 001 0445 J~> OI JO Date: March 1989 ReV.sior 5 NO N/A 12.4 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in 1 ^-- the reporting of average response factors (RRF) or %RSD? (Check at least two values but if errors are ^.^ found, check more.) ^ [__) __ J ACTION: Circle errors in red. ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / | resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and •« note errors under "Conclusions". j 13.0 GC/MS <^P TT^"UTiliiJT eT ^"^bration (Form VTH i 13.1 Are the Continuing Calibration Forms (Form VH) present and complete for the volatile fraction? 13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed for every twelve hours of sample analysis per -i instrument? ACTION: List below all sample analyses that were I not within twelve hours of the previous continuing calibration analysis. ACITCN: If any forms are missing or no continuing calibration standard has been analyzed within twelve hours of every sample analysis, call lab for explanation / resubmittal. If continuing calibration data are not available, flag all associated sample data as unusable ("R"). 13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard compounds have a ERF < 0.05? \S ACTION: circle all outliers in red. ACTION: If any volatile compound has a RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that compound as estimated ("J"), and flag nan-detects for that compound as unusable ("R"). 13.4 Do any compounds have a % difference between initial and .^ continuing calibration RRF > 25%? \s [__] —— ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated sample data as outlined in the table below: TUT 001 0446 1 1r i oj-fuiuttiMj wruv^Lj_i*j FT* *, f,\ fl inr. ^age: ±4 or Jt> Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A % DIFFERENCE i f bjT 1 J 25-50 positive results, no action for f non detects ii|.j. 50-90 positive results. 'UJ' non detects'* ii j-j. >90 positive {results. "R" jnon detects • • . I 13.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the reporting of average response factors (ERF) or difference (%D) between initial and continuing RRFs? (Check at least two values but if errors are found, check more.) __ f V^l ACTION: circle errors in zed. ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make &••/ necessary corrections and Jiote errors under "Conclusions". (Fcnr. Vim 14.1 Are the internal standard areas (Form VIII) of every sarple and blank within the upper and lower limits fcr each continuing calibration? ACTION: List all the outliers below. Sample f Internal Std Area Lower Limit Upper Limit 111600 (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the upper or lower limit, flag with "J" all positive results and non- detects (U values) guantitated with this internal standard. If extremely low area counts are reported, or if performance exhibits a major abrupt drop off, flag all associated detects as unusable 14.2 Are the retention times of the internal standards within 30 seconds of the associated calibration standard? ACTION: Professional judgement should be used to qualify i data if the retention times differ by more than j^ 30 seconds. TIJT 001 0447 STANDARD OESttUNG HOCZDURE Page: 15 of - 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 i i NO N/A 15.1 Were any field *"r'Hf"a')''>c «i>™i->-t-ari for VDA analysis? { __ J ACTICN: Conpare the reported results for field *v» and calculate the relative percent difference. ACTICN: Any gross variation between field duplicate results most be addressed in the reviewer narrative. However, if large differences exist, of fiyUri fl'ipl j«^»*'«g should bp the saooler. TUT 001 O448 1 • OU-VUl-fT-'Vi.' wrLJVrti JJ'Aj WflJLJLUUWC. 1 PAST B: BNA ANALYSES h 1.0 Traffic Reoorts a1^ Lj^Ta*iTv N^yrrative - roye. J.D ui jo Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A * J l.i Are the Traffic Report Fcrfcs present for all samples? f _Vj __ __ I ACTION: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing 'i or illegible copies. s 1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any problems with sanple receipt, condition of sanples, analytical problems or special notations affecting the quality of the data? ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the effect on the quality of the data. ACTION: If any sanple analyzed as a soil contains more than 50% water, all data should be rejected. :.C, HolduTQ Tinea 2.1 Have any BNA holding rines, determined from date of collection to date of extraction, been exceeded? Samples for BNA analysis, both soils and waters, must be extracted within seven days of the date of collection. Extracts must be analyzed within 40 days of the date of extraction. Tghle of Holding Time Violations (See Traffic Report) Sample Date Date Lab Date Date Sample Matrix Sanpled Received Extracted Analyzed ACTION: If holding times are exceeded, flag all positive results as estimated ("J") and sample quantitation limits as estimated ("UJ11), and document in the narrative that holding times were exceeded. TUT 001 0449 rage: i/ 01 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 > ' YES HO N/A If analyses were done more than 14 days beyond holding time, either on the first analysis or upon reanalysis, the reviewer must use professional judgement to determine the reliability of the data and the effects of additional storage on the sample results. The reviewer may determine that non-detect data are unusable ("R"). [__] __ _£ 3.0 Surrogate Recovery fForm 3.1 Are the BNA Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II) present for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water b. Had Water c. Low Soil d. Med Soil -.2 Are all the BNA sarples listed on the appropriate Surrogate Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water b. Med Water [__] c. Low Soil d. Med Soil [__] __ ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittals. If missing deliverables are unavailable, document effect on data under "Conclusions" section of reviewer narrative. 3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? Lk3 ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. 3.4 Were two or more base-neutral ££ acid surrogate recoveries out of specification for any sample or method blank? \/ [__] __ If yes, were samples reanalyzed? Were method blanks reanalyzed? ACTION: If all BNA surrogate recoveries are > 10% but two within the base-neutral or acid fraction do not meet SOW specifications, for the affected fraction ^ 1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J"). 2. Flag all non-detects as estimated detection limits ("UJ"). TUT OO1 O45O SIBNEftRD OFIKAinJG PROCEDURE Page: 18 Of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A If any base-neutral or acid surrogate has a recovery of <10% : 1. F3ag all positive results for that fraction (i.e. all acid or. base-neutral compounds) nJ". 2. Flag all nan-detects for that fraction "R". Professional judgement should be used to qualify data that have method blank surrogate recoveries out of specification in both original and re- analyses. Check the internal standard areas. 3.5 Are there any trdnscrlption/raImlation errors between raw data and FOOT H? ACTICN: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resuimittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". Matrix SpiKes fForm TU) t.l j.5 "Jit MeLrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III) }« ?s»ent? 4.2 Were matrix spikes *«'u«iypwi at the required frequency for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water b. Med Water c. Low Soil d. Med Soil ACTION: If any matrix spike data are missing, take the action specified in 3.2 above. 4.3 How many EN\ spike recoveries are outside QC limits? Water . Soils /Sfcfe^fcO) . out Of 22 ( 0 out Of 22 SbG £J 4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits? out o 11 i o out of u If MS and MSD both nave less than 101 recovery for an analyte, negative results for that analyte should be rejected, and positive results should be flagged "J". The above applies only to the sample used for MS/MSD analysis. Use professional judgement in arrVUrinr* +*nc /-r-i«-er-inr» f-r> o»-haw eamrtloe [V_] [ _ ] liXl I __ ] UT 001 0451 SIWCftRD OPERATING PRQCmjRE Page: 19 Of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO Blanks (Form IV) -.1 Is the Method Blank Suntnary (Form IV) present? [ ^H 5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of TCL compounds, has a reagent /Method blank been analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples of similar matrix (low water, ned water, low soil, / medium soil) , whichever is more frequent? [ VXl _ _ 5.3 Chromatography: review the blank raw data - chromatograms (RICs) , quant reports or data system printouts and spectra. Is the ?:hronatographic perf orrarr ;. (vaseline stability) for each instrument acceptable fo ^ Use professional judgement to determine the effect on the data. i contamination NOTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are validated like any other sample and are act used to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the other QC blanks discussed below. 6.1 Do any nethod/instrument/reagent blanks have positive results (TCL and/or TIC) for BAs? When applied as described below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution Factor. 6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive H& results (TCL and/or TIC)? ^_ t__] __ Prepare a list of the samples associated St>QK?~ ^"?b^-"/lo0^cc. with each of the contaminated blanks. (Attach a separate sheet.) NOTE: Oily field/rinse blanks taken the same day -z>y7L>-z as the samples are used to qualify data. Blanks T\ £ may not be qualified because of contamination in another blank. Blanks may be qualified for surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems. ^ ft TUT 001 0452 mJCLDURE iJU or - 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest value from all the associated blanks. YES NO N/A Common Fhthalate Esters Other Contaminants j Sample cone > CRQLj Sanple cone < CRQL &j Sanple cone > CRQL but < lOx blank is < lOx blank value value 6 >10x blank value Flag sanple result Reject sample result No qualification with a 'U'; cross and report CRQL; is needed out 'B' flag cross out 'B' flag ! Sanple cone > CPQLj Sample cone < CRQL t! Sample cone > CRQL but < 5x blank jis < 5x blank value value t > 5 blank value Flag sanple result Reject sanple result No qualification {with a «U«; cross and report CRQL; is needed out 'B' flag cross out «B' flag ACTION: For TIC compounds, if the concentration in the sanple is less than five tir.es the concentration in the most con- taminated associated blank, flag the sample data "R" (unusable). 6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every sanple? w-^' ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that there is no associated field/rinse/eguipment blank. Exception: samples taken from a drinking water tap do not have associated field blanks. 7.0 GC/K5 Tuning and Mass f^illhration fForm V) 7.1 Are the GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration Forms (Form V) present for Decafluorotriphenylphosphine (DFTPP)? 7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge (m/z) listing for the DFTPP provided for each twelve hour shift? 7.3 Has a tuning performance compound been analyzed for every twelve hours of sanple analysis per instrument? ACTION: If any tuning data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ACTION: List date, time, instrument ID, and sample analyses for which no associated GC/MS tuning data are available. tJ/J __ —— TUT oo i O453 SIMEftRD OPERATHG PROCEDURE Page: 21 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A DATE 1TME INSTRUMENT SAMPLE NUMBERS ACTION: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration interval. 7.4 Have the ion abundance criteria been net for each instrument used? ACTION: List all data which do not -meet ion abundance criteria (attach a separate sheet). ACTION- If tuning calibration is in error, flag all associated sample data as unusable ( "R" ) . However, if expanded ion criteria are met (See 1988 Functional Guidelines) , the data reviewer may accept data with appropriate qualifiers. 7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors between mass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least two values but if errors are found, check more. ) 7.6 Have the appropriate number of significant figures (two) been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors are found check more values. ) ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal , make necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". 7.7 Are the spectra of the mass calibration compound acceptable? ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine whether associated data should be accepted, qualified, or rejected. [_^J __ __ 8.0 Concound List I 8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I present with required header information on each page, for each of the following: a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates c. Blanks TUT O01 O454 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 22 of ' 36 'Date: March 1989 Revision 6 8.2 Are the ENA Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, the mass spectra for the identified compounds, and the data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in the sample package for each of the following? a. Sar^ie= and/or fractions as appropriate b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates {Mass spectra not required) c. Blanks ACTION: If any data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. 8.3 Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report? 3.4 Is chromatographic performance acceptable with respect to: Baseline stabilityv-^ YES NO N/A Resolution Peak shape Full-scale graph (attenuation) Other:_______________ ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the acceptability of the data. 8.5 Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the identified ENA compounds present for each, sample? ACTION: If any mass spectra are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. If lab does not generate their own standard spectra, make note in "Contract Problems/Non-compliance". impound within 0.06 RRT units of the standard RRT in the continuing calibration? 8.6 Is the RRT of each reported 8.7 Are all ions present in the standard mass spectrum at a relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the sample mass spectrum? 8.8 Do sample and standard relative ion intensities agree within 20%? ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine acceptability of data. If it is determined that incorrect identifications were made, all such data should be rejected, flagged "N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of the compound) or changed to not detected (at the calculated detection limit). [_3 I_3 _ — t±L3 __ — TUT 001 0455 page: 2J or - 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A Tentatively Identified Compounds 9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified compound Forms (Form I, Part B) present; and do listed TICs include scan number or retention tine, estimated concentration and "J" qualifier? 9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified compounds and associated "best match" spectra included in the sample package for each of the following: a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate b. Blanks ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ACTION: Add "J" qualifier if missing and "N" qualifier to all identified TIC compounds on Form I, Part B. • Are any TCL compounds (from any fraction) listed as TIC compounds (example: 1,2-dimethylbenzene is xylene— a VQA TCL—and should not be reported as a TIC)? -- ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC. 9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the sample mass spectrum? 9.5 Do TIC and "best match" standard relative ion intensities agree within 20%? ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine acceptability of TIC identifications. If it is determined that an incorrect identi- fication was made, change identification to "unknown" or to some less specific identi- fication (example: "C3 substituted benzene") as appropriate. 10.0 Cuiiujuund Co*r|'*'i'fo'tion and Reported Detecti^ LlrU'Vg 10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in Form I results? Check at least two positive values. Verify that the correct internal standard, quantitation ion, and RRF were used to calculate Form I result. Were any errors found? 10.2 Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions ~-s and, for soils, sample moisture? LSLJ _ _ LL/3 _ _ J _ .] __ __ TUT 001 0456 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 24 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resutnittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". ACTION: When a sample is analyzed at more than one dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis). Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration range in the original analysis by crossing cut the "E" value on the original Form I and substi- tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted sample. Specify which Form I is to be used, then draw a red "X" across the entire page of all Form I's that should not be used, including any in the summary package. Cata 11 Are the Reconstructed Ion Chronatograms, and data system printouts (Quant. Reports)' present for initial and continuing calibration? ACTION: If any calibration standard data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ^""12.0 GC/K5 Initial Calibration fFora VI) 12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present and complete for the ENA fraction? f0^ 1 ACTION: If any calibration standard forms are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. 12.2 Are response factors stable for -ENAs over the concentration range of the calibration (RSD <30%)? [__] V —— ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: When RSD >30%, non-detects may be qualified using professional judgement. Flag all positive results "J". When RSD >90%, flag all non-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region U policy.) 12.3 Do any compounds have a RRF < 0.05? \/ [——3 —— ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. 1 ACTION: If any ENA compound has an average RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that t, compound as estimated ("J"), and flag non- ' detects for that compound as unusable ("R"). iUT OO1 0457 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE ' Page: 25 of ~ 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A 12.4 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the reporting of average response factors (RRF) or *RSD? (Check at least two values but if errors are found, check acre. ) ACTION: Circle errors in red. ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any. necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". / 13.0 GC/MS ContJiT^^ip^f ft* "I ^ration fFuim 13.1 Are the Continuing Calibration Forms (Form VU) present ./ and complete for the BNA fraction? LL^J __ __ 13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed for every twelve hours of sample analysis per instrument? \ ^ 1 __ __ ACTION List below all sample analyses that were not within twelve hours of the previous continuing calibration analysis. ACTION: If any forms are missing or no continuing calibration standard has been analyzed within twelve hours of every sample analysis, call lab for explanation / resutssittal. If continuing calibration data are not available, flag all associated sample data as unusable ("R"). 13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard compounds have a RRF < 0.05? ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. ACTION: If any BNA compound has a RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that compound as estimated ("J"), and flag non-detects for that compound as unusable ("R"). 13.4 Do any compounds have a % difference between initial and continuing calibration RRF > 25%? \s ; [__] __ ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated sample data as outlined in the table below: TUT 001 0458 STANDARD OFn&TING PROCEDURE Page: 26 'of- 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 j 25-50 ' 'J1 positive rfcauiti, no action for ncn detects i \ DlF'tLRhNCE j 50-90 'J1 positive results, 'UJ1 non detects - j in i • it < ~*r* t r*^^i 5CES NO N/A >90 j 'J1 positive j results, "R" . • ' . . _ non detects j - . • —— ^_ —— r_^' •• • • -.ilm4--?nn .-.»-». . — i i -i-rl -4-tn* reporting of average response factors (RRF) or diff< (%D) between initial and continuing RRTs? (Check at least two values but if enurb are found, check more.) ACTION: Circle errors in red. ACTION: If en.uii» are large, call lab for explanation / r« isubmittal, uvake any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". .v-^rncl. S La: darns fTorrn TIU'i ' i Are thf- internal standard areas (Form VHI) of every 3a.T7.dx and blank within the upper and lower limits lor each continuing calibration? ACTION: List an the outliers below. Sanple # Internal Std Area Lower Limit Upper Limit (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the upper or lower limit, flag with "J" an positive results and non- detects (U values) quantitated with this internal- standard. If extremely low area counts are reported, or if performance exhibits a major abrupt drop off, flag an associated nan- detects as unusable ("R"). 14.2 Are the retention times of the internal standards within 30 seconds of the associated calibration standard? ACTION: Professional judgement should be used to qualify data if the retention tines differ by more than 30 TUT 001 O459 tOANLftr<L> O^i_-(Aj..LNti iWCEJURE Page: 27 of , 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 N/A 15.0 Field 15.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for SNA analysis? [ __ ] __ ACTION: Corpare the reported results for field duplicates and calculate the relative percent difference. ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate results oust be addresser! in the reviewer narrative. However, if large differences exist, identification of field duplicates should be confirmed by contacting the sanpler. TUT 001 0460 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 28 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 PART C: 1.0 Traffic and 1.2 Are the Traffic Report Fonns present for all sanples? ACITCK: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing or illegible copies. 1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any problems with sample receipt, condition of samples, analytical problems or special notations affecting the ifiality of the data? ACITCK: Use professional judgement to evaluate the effect on the quality of the data. ACTION: If any sample analyzed as a soil contains more than 501 water, all data should be rejected. X&SS 2-3- Have any PEST/PCB holding times, determined from date of collection to date of extraction, beer, exceeded? Samples for PEST/PCB analysis, both soils and waters, — must be extracted within seven days of the date of collection. Extracts must be analyzed within 40 days of the date of extraction. 3.0 Surrccate Recovery fForn HJ 3.1 Are the PEST/PCB Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II) presenc for each of the following matrices: a. IWWater b. Med Water c. Law Son d. Med Son 3.2 Are all trie PEST/PCB samples listed on the appropriate Surrogate Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrices: a. Lev Water b. Med Water c. Low Soil **s d. Med SoU YES NO N/A f \ / j __ __ fi XI __ Id" «**"$ [__)^ I ^ ^ [_3 TUT 001 0461 SIMJCftRD OFEKMTNG PROCEDURE Page: 29 Of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A~ ACTICU: Call lab for explanation / resutmittals. If missing deliverables are unavailable, document effect on data under "Conclusions" section of reviewer narrative. 3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? [__1 _ ¥L ACnCN: Circle all outliers in red. 3.4 Was surrogate (DBC) recovery outside of the contract / specification for any sample or blank? __ I V \ ACTICN: No qualification is done if surrogates are diluted beyond detection. If recovery is below contract limit (but above zero), flag all results for that sample "J". If recovery is zero, flag positive results "J" and nan-detects "R". If recovery for the blank is zero, flag nan-detects for all associated samples "R". If recovery is above contract limit, flag all positive result-s for that sample "J", unless in the reviewers professional judgement the high recovery is due to co-eluting interference (check the associated blank - if recovery is high there also, flag the sample data). 3.5 Are there any transcript ion/calculation errors between raw data and Form II? ACTICN: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resutmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". 4.0 Matrix Spikes (Form HI) 4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III) present? 4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency for each of the following matrices: a. Low Water b. Msd Water [__] __ c. Low Soil tjt^J __ d. Mad Soil [_] _ ftCHCN: If any matrix spike data are missing, take the action specified in 3.2 above. 4.3 How many PEST/PCB spike recoveries are outside QC limits? Water Soils OUt Of 12 0 OUt Of 12 TUT 001 0462 OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 30 Of 36 Hate:. March 1989 Revision 6 YES ND N/A 4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spite and matrix spike duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits? Water Soils I out of 6 0 out of 6 ACTICN; if MS and M5D both have less than zero recovery for an analyte, negative results for that analyte should be rejected, and positive results should be flagged "J". Tne above applies only to the sample used for MS/MSD analysis. Use professional judgement in applying this criterion to other samples. '•*\ 8iarJts (Form IV) • J Is the Method Blank Sannary (Form IT) present? 11^3 _ _ .;. Frequency of analysis: foi the analysis of Pesticide TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples of similar matrix (low water, ned water, low soil, radium soil), whichever is more frequent? 5.3 Chromatograpny: review the blank raw data - chromatograns, quant reports or data system printouts. Is the chroTBtographic performance jbasej-ine stability) for each instrument acceptable for PEST/FCBs? \\/ ] __ 7O1CN: Use professional judgement to determine the effect on the data. 6.0 NOTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are validated like any other sample and are Dflt used to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the other QC blanks discussed below. 6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive results for PEST/FCBs? When applied as described below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution Factor. 6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive PEST/PCB results? aCTICN: Prepare a list of the samples associated with each of the contaminated blanks. (Attach a separate sheet.) TUT O01 O46 STMEftRD OPERAHN3 PROCEDURE N3IE: Page: 31 of Date: March 1989 Revision 6 36 YES Only field/rinse blanks taken the same day as the sanpies are used to qualify data. Blanks nay not be qualified because of contamination in another blank. Blanks Tray be qualified for surrogate, spectral, tuning I.T calibration QC problems. : Follow the directions in the table below to qualify TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest value from all the associated blanks. NO N/A Sample cone > CRQL but < 5x blank Sample cone < CBQL & is < 5x blank value Reject sample result and report CFQL; cross out "B" flag Sample cone > O*QL fc > 5x blank value Flag sample result wit-n a "U"; cross ou-r "B" flag No qualification is needed 6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipmertt blanks associated with every sample? ACTICTJ: For low level samples, note in data assessment that there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank. Exception: samples taken from a drinking water tap do not have associated field blanks. 7.0 7.1 Are the following Gas Chromatograms and Data System Printouts for both Primary and Confirmation (confirmation standards not required if there are no positive results above CBQL) column present: a. Evaluation standard Mix A b. Evaluation standard Mix B c. Evaluation Standard Mix C d. Individual standard Mix A e. Individual standard Mix B f. Multi-component Pesticides Ibxaphene t Chlordane g. Aroclors 1016/1260 (\to(o$) h. Aroclors 1221, 1232, 1242, 1248, and 1254 ACnCN: if no, take action specified in 3.2 above. ud' [_!/] $ TUT 001 0464 t STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 32 of 36 Date: March 1989 | Revision 6 " " Y E S N O 7.2 Is Fonn VIII Pest-1 present and crnplete for each GC column (primary and confinnation) and each 72 hour sequence of analyses? ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above. 7.3 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw data and Form VUT? ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". 7.4 Has the total breakdown on quantitation or confirmation / column exceeded 20% for DOT? __ f V\ . - for Endrin? __ [ J,/] __ or if Endrin aldehyde and 4,4'-DDD oo-elute and there is a peak at their retention tine, has the combined DOT and Endrin / breakdov-. exceeded 20%? __ Q/j __ If DOT breakdown is greater than 20% on quantitation column beginning with the sarples following the last in control standard: 1* Flag all positive DOT results "J". 2. If DOT was not detected but DDD and/or DDE are positive, flag the DOT ncn-detect "R". 3. Flag positive DDD and DDE results "JN". 4. If DDT breakdown is > 20% on confinnation column and DOT is identified on quantitation column but not on confirmation column, use professional judgement to determine whether DDT should be reported on Form I (if reported, flag result "N"). b. If Endrin breakdown is > 20% on quantitation column, beginning with the samples following the last in control standard: 1. Flag all positive Endrin results "J". 2. If Endrin was not detected, but Endrin Aldehyde and/or Endrin Ketone are positive, flag the Endrin non-detect "R". 3. Flag Endrin Ketone positive results "JN". 4. If Endrin breakdown is > 20% on confirmation column and Endrin is identified on quantitation column but not on confinnation column, use professional judgement to determine whether Endrin should be reported on Form I (if reported, flag result "N"). c. If the combined breakdown is used (it can only be used if the conditions in 7.4 above are met) and is > 20% on quantitation column beginning with the last in control standard, take the actions specified in 7.4 a and b above. If the combined breakdown is >20% on confinnation column and Endrin or DDT is identified on quantitation column but not on confinnation column, use professional judgement to determine whether Endrin or DDT should be reported on Form I (if reported, flag result "N"). TUT O01 O465 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 33 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 NO 7.5 Is the linearity check RSD of all four calibration factors /" <10% for the quantitation column? fv 1 __ __ ACTION: If no, flag positive hits for all pesticide and PCS analytes "J" for ail associated samples. Do not flag toxaphene or DOT if they are quantified from a 3-point calibration curve. 7.6 Is the % difference between the EVAL A and each analysis (quantitation and confirmation) DBC retention tip** within QC limits (2% for packed column, 0.3% for capillary [I.D. < 0.32 on], yt for aegabore [0.32 < Z.O. < 2 on]) ? ACTION: DBC retention tine cannot be evaluated if DBC is not detected. If it is present and has a retention time out of QC limits, then use professional judgement to determine the reliability of the analysis and flag results "R", if appropriate. : . Wdss the proper analytical sequence^ followed for each /' 72 hour period of analyses (page FEST D-36 in 8/87 SOW) . [\s ] __ __ ACTION: If no, use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect on the data and accept or reject it accordingly. Generally, the effect is negligible unless the sequence was grossly altered or the calibration was also cut of limits. 8.0 pp-gticide/PCB Sty^***^ fiTITBTY 8.1 Is Form IX present and complete for each GC column and / 72 hr sequence of analyses? riX] __ __ ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above. 8.2 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw data and Form DC? _ ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". 8.3 Is DOT retention time for packed columns > 12 min /" (except OV-l and OV-101 columns)? f Vl __ —— ACTION: If no, check that there is adequate resolution between individual components. If not, flag results for compounds that interfere with each ^ other (co-elute) "R". 0 8.4 Do all standard retention times fall within the windows I established for the first IND A and IND B analyses? TUT' 001 0466 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 34 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 NO N/ ACTION: Beginning with the samples following the last in control standard, check to see if the chrcnatograms contain peaks within an expanded window surrounding the expected retention tunes. If no peaks are found and, DBC is visible nan-detects are valid. If peaks are present and cannot be identified through "pattern recognition" or a consistent shift in standard retention tines, flag all affected compound results "R". 8.5 Are the continuing calibration standard calibration factors within 15% (for quantitation column) or 20% (for confirmation column} of the initial (at beginning of 72 hr sequence) calibration factors? ACTION: If no, flag all associated positive results "J". Use professional judgement to determine whether or^ot to flag non-detects. r«»fc.t.cide/PCS Identification Is Form X ccrplete for every sarple in which a or PCB was detected? ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above. 9.2 Are there any transcription errors between raw data and Fora X? ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". 9.3 Are retention tines of sample compounds within the calculated retention tine windows for both quantitation ^^ and confirmation analyses? r "* Was GC/M5 confirmation provided when required (when compound concentration is > 10 ug/ml in final extract)? ACTION: Reject ("R") all positive results (meeting quantitation column criteria, but missing confirmation by a second column or GC/MS (if appropriate). Also, reject ("R") all positive results not meeting retention tine window criteria unless associated standard compounds are similarly biased (i.e. base on RRT to DBC). 9.4 Check chromatograms for false negatives, especially for the multiple peak components toxaphene and FCB's. Were there any false negatives? ACTION: If appropriate PCB standards were not analyzed, or if the lab performed no confirmation analysis, flag the appropriate data with an "R". TUT 001 0467 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 35 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 —————————————————————————————————————ygj;————————————JJQ N/A OUATl^i^atT on Jtrv3 t?£»rv^y^^^ Fta+'^'^irvs T ^w**J^e 10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in Form I results? Check at least two positive values. Were any errors found? __ [__] NOTE: Sisple peak pesticide results can be checked for rough agreement between quantitative results obtained on the two GC columns. The reviewer should use professional judgement to decide whether a ouch larger concentration obtained on one column versus the other indicates the presence of an interfering compound. If an interfering compound is indicated, the lower of the two values should be reported and qualified as presumptively present at an estimated quantity ("JN") . This necessitates a determination of an estimated concentration on the confirmation column. The narrative should indicate that the presence of interferences has obscured the attaint at a second column confirmation. Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions . ^/ and, for soils, sample moisture? 1>X7 [ __ ] __ ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary collections and note errors under "Conclusions". ACTION: When a sanple is analyzed at more than one dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis) . Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration range in the original analysis by crossing cut the "E" value on the original Fonn I and substi- tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted sanple. Specify which Form I is to be used, then draw a red "X" across the entire page of all Form I's that should not be used, including any in the summary package. U.I Were baselines stable? 11.2 Were any electropositive displacement (negative peaks) or unusual peaks seen? 11.3 Were early eluting peaks (for early eluting analytes) resolved to baseline? ( __ ] . _ J/. ACITCN: For 11.1 and 11.2, cement only. For 11.3, reject ("R") those analytes that are not sufficiently resolved. ,..,.,< 046B TUT uo1 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 36 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 " " ' " YES NO N/A 12.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for PEST/PCB analysis? [ __ ] ACTION: Compare the reported results for field and f^iraii^t^ the relative percent difference. ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate results must be addressed in the reviewer narrative. However, if large differences exist, identification of field duplicates should be confirmed by contacting the sanpler. TUT OO1 O469 1. CASE -s , shipment and/or analyt elf 22EI"10" °f •"> qu<li'y control. s reported 1n the data pacUas? wcountered in proeeiting tne e n ,h,n re-analy$is to be 61l1able. and If $0^ JtJ! * ' tthfr 1t "n>'"r$ the resalytlon. ' > corrective actions ta*er.t and tne SQHPLE DOTf9 PQCKOBE _ 181 TUT (>01 O47O I GOMPUCHEM LABORATORIES EPA CASE NARRATIVE—CASE! 12058 Contract No. 68-D9-0032 SOGl BX260 CompuChem Laboratories, Inc. Sample Numbers: BX260 BX979 BX981 BX990 BX991 BX993 BX994 BX995 BX996 BY701 BY758 BY761 BY762 BY763 BY764 BY766 BY767 BY768 This portion of Case if 12058 consisted of 10 water samples for volatile, semivolatile, and pesticide analysis, 7 water samples for volatile only analysis, and 1 water sample for semivolatile and pesticide only analysis. The samples were received on 6-7-89, 6-9- 89, 6-10-89, 6-12-89, and 6-14-89 in properly sealed shipping containers via USPS Express Mail. Several discrepancies were noted during the receipt of the samples. SMO was notified and CompuChem was instructed to proceed with the analysis of the samples and note discrepancies on the traffic reports. The traffic report for sample BX260 did not required a pesticide analysis although one was required. One VOA each for samples BX995 and BX996 were received broken due to poor packaging. Sample BY764 was not listed on the traffic report or chain-of-custody documents; however, two VOAs were received for it on 6-12-89. Sample BY761 was missing two VOAs. Sample BY763 was missing one 80 oz. amber bottle. Sample BY768 was missing one 80 oz. amber bottle. Thirteen of the samples were designated as either field blanks or trip blanks. VOLATILES: All volatile fractions were analyzed within holding time require- ments. Nine of the seventeen samples requiring volatile analysis contained TCL compounds. Samples BX260, BX979, BX990, BX993, BX996, BY762, and BY767 (all designated as field or trip blanks) did not contain any TCL compounds. Each sample did contain a tentatively identified compound at significant levels. This TIC could not be attributed to laboratory contamination or sample carryover and was considered to be an actual constituent of the samples. A qualifier was included with each sample. Samples BX981, BY701, and BY766 (also designated as field or trip blanks) each contained low levels of methylene chloride and/or acetone along with the tentatively identified compound mentioned above. Qualifiers were also included with these samples. Sample BY758, which was designated as a field blank contained a below CRQL level of chlorobenzene and no tentatively, identified compounds. The chlorobenzene could not be attributed to laboratory contamination or sample carryover and was considered to be an actual constituent of the sample. A qualifier was included with the data. Sample BY763, which was designated as a field blank, required a dilution due to the high level of acetone present. It also contained methylene chloride and a tentatively identified compound, COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES,INC. P.O. Box 12652 3308Chap«Hril/NelsonHigrtway fteMrcti TriangtoPark.NC27709 (919)549-8263 TUT OO1 0471 5| pOMPUCHEM £3 lABOF&TORIES trichlorofluororaethane. The presence of these compounds could not be attributed to laboratory contamination or sample carryover and. were considered to be actual constituents of the sample. A qualifier was included with the data. Sample BY768, designated as a field blank, contained methylene chloride, acetone, carbon disulfide, and one tentatively identified compound, trichloro- fluoromethane. The presence of these compounds could not be attributed to laboratory contamination or sample carryover and were considered to be actual constituents of the sample. A qualifier was included with the data. Sample BY764 required a dilution due to the high levels of TCL compounds present including benzene, toluene, and xylenes and also contained many tentatively identified compounds. Sample BX994 contained xylenes and three tentatively identified compounds. Sample BX995 did not contain any TCL or tentatively identified compounds. Sample BX991 contained 4-methyl- 2-pentanone and many tentatively identified compounds. The D5- chlorobenzene internal standard fell below QC limits in the sample along with the bromofluorobenzene surrogate. The DS-toluene surrogate recovery exceeded QC limits. These failures were attributed to the actual sample matrix and were confirmed when the same trends were seen in BX991MS/MSD. The associated blank spike was reported which met all QC criteria and qualifiers were included with the original and spike data. All surrogate recovery criteria were met except those mentioned above. The matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate results were acceptable. The recovery of trichloroethene exceeded QC limits in the MS and the recoveries of toluene exceeded QC limits in the MS/MSD. These failures may have resulted from the observed sample matrix effect mentioned above. SEMIVOLATILES: All seiniyolatile fractions were extracted and analyzed within holding time requirements. TCL compounds were present in three of the 11 samples requiring semivolatile analysis. Sample BY76S contained only a below CRQL level of bis(2-ethyIhexy1)phthalate. Tentatively identified compounds were present in only five of the samples. Two analyses of sample BX995 were reported and billed. In the initial analysis, 2-fluorophenol and D5-phenol surrogate recoveries fell below QC limits. The sample was reextracted and reanalyzed and the same recovery trends for the two surrogates were present. It was concluded that the surrogate failures resulted from the actual sample matrix and both analyses were reported with a qualifier. Two analyses of sample BY761 were reported and billed. In the initial analysis, the levels of naphthalene and 2- methylnaphthalene exceeded QC limits. The sample was reanalyzed at a dilution and both analyses were reported due to the loss of some compounds in the dilution. In sample BY761, the recovery of D5- nitrobenzene exceeded QC limits. In sample BY762, the recovery of 2,4,6-tribromophenol exceeded QC limits. All other surrogate recovery criteria were met. The QC matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate results were acceptable. COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC. PO. Box 12652 3308 Chapel Hill/Nelson Highway Research Triangle Park. NC 27709 (919)549-8263 /Bio TUT O01 O472 f . —B GOMPUCHEM 1 2SS LABORATORIES I PESTICIDES: All pesticide fractions were extracted and analyzed within holding time requirements. None of the samples contained any reportable levels of TCL compounds. Only 300ml of sample BX260 were available for extraction due to low volume. This resulted in slightly elevated detection limits. All surrogate recovery criteria were met. The QC matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate results were acceptable. The recoveries of gamma-BHC, endrin, and 4,4'-DOT exceeded QC limits in the MSD. The RPD value for endrin exceeded QC limits in the MS/MSD. I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer-readable data submitted on floppy diskette has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as verified by the following signature. Note: This report was paginated for reference and accountability in decreasing numerical sequence. C . u/lfcK.. fr/kv A? .Jtmet C. Garrett 6-26-89 Technical Reviewer COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC. PO. Box 12652 3308 Chapel Hill/Nelson Highway Research Triangle Park. NC 27709 (919)549-8263 It TUT 001 0473 GOMPUCHEM lABORMORlES QUALITY ASSURANCE NOTICB With the advent of the new organics Statement of Work (SOW 2/88, Revision: 9/88) participants in EPA's Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) are required to provide hard copy and diskette deliverables. CompuChem employs the Finnigan QA Formaster Program (Format A) to generate these requirements using data files from our analytical instrumentation. Currently, and independently, quantitation reports are generated by the instruments and are used with CompuChem-developed software to calculate results. The GC and GC/MS quantitation routines employ the convention of carrying at least one extra significant figure until the mathematical computations are completed. Then, the quantitative results are rounded to the SOW-required number of significant figures for reporting. In addition, the algorithm used by the Formaster Program is slightly different than that employed in Compuchem's software routines. Therefore, results presented in the supportive data supplied with our deliverables packages may be slightly different than those which appear on the hard copy forms generated via Formaster. This notice serves to alert the end users of these data yes as to the reason why slight differences may be Robert E. Meierer Director of Quality Assurance COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC POBo« 12652 3308 Chapel Hill/Nelson Highway He»e«rcn Triangle Park. NC 27709 (919)549-8263 -SIMPLE DQTB PfUXmeeT - ..-.. 180 TUT 001 0474 LABORATORY HOTICE On June 15, 1985 ConpuChen Laboratories began adding D3-2,4-01n1trophenol to •11 standards and samples. The purpose of this addition 1s to enable the laboratory to have higher and more consistent analytical sensitivity for the native 2,4-D1n1trophenol. The peak corresponding to the deuterated analog 1s clearly labeled on each RJC at 03*1 and will not be searched and reported as a tentatively Identified compound (TIC). This compound 1s not being used as an Internal or surrogate standard. _. TTcnaraTTynn, Development Chemist Fierer, Director of Quality Assurance SOHPLE DOT a PttCKBBE TUT OO1 O475 DETECTION LIMIT CALCULATION CLARIFICATION To protect our K columns from unntetssary contamination, soil samplts prtpartd according to Caucus Protocol mtthods art routlntly dlluttd 5:1. Through a strlts of tiptHmtnts vt havt determined that our Instrumtnt Otttctlon Limit for ptstlcldts Is SX lowtr than tht EPA Contract Rtqulrtd QuantUatlon Limit (CRQL). Me, thtrtfort. only adjust our dtttctlon limits If tht dilution ntctssary to analyzt tht samplt Is grtattr than 5:1. If tht samplt 1s dlluttd by a factor of X tht dtttctlon limit Is adjusted by X Insttad of X. Bob Meierer Director, Quality Assurance SBMPLE oara PBCKBBE IS 06 TUT OO1 0476 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: CQMPUCHEM LABS ________ Lab Coda: CQMPP case No.: 12QS8 Matrix: (soil/watar) SOIL Sanpla wt/vol: 30. Q (g/mL) fi __ Laval: (lov/mad) LOW % Moisture: not dac, _ 21 dec. ___ Extraction: (SapF/Cont/Sonc) SONG GPC cleanup: (Y/N) H__ pH: BX261 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX2S8 CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 266349____ Lab File ID: G2J66349A04 Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Extracted: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/11/89 Dilution Factor: 1.00 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 99-09-2 ——————— 3-Nitroaniline 83-32-9 ——————— Acenaphthene 51-28-5 ——————— 2 . 4-Dinitrophenol 100-02-7 —————— 4-Nitrophenol 132-64-9 ——— —— Dibenzofuran 121-14-2 —————— 2 . 4-Dinitrotoluene 84-66-2 ——————— Diethylphthalate 7005-72-3 ————— 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether __ 86-73-7 ——————— Fluorene 100-01-6 —————— 4-Nitroaniline 534-52-1 —————— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Methyiphenol 86-30-6 —————— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ( 1) __ 101-55-3 ————— •4-Bromophenyl-phenylether ___ 118-74-1 —————— Hexachlorobenzene 87-86-5 —————— Pentachlorophenol 85-01-8 ——————— Phenanthrene 120-12-7 —————— Anthracene 84-74-2 ——————— Di-n-Butylphthalate 206-44-0 —————— Fluoranthene 129-00-0 —————— Pvrene 85-68-7 ——————— Butylbenzylphthalate 91-94-1 ——————— 3 . 3 ' -Dichlorobenzidine 56-55-3 — - ——— >-Benzo fa) Anthracene 2 18-01-9 —————— Chrysene - 117-81-7 ————— bis (2-Bthylhexyl) Phthalate __ 117-84-0 —————— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 205-99-2 —————— Benzo (b) Fluoranthene 207-08-9 —————— Benzo (k) Fluoranthene . 50-32-8 ——————— Benzol a) Pyrene 193-39-5 —————— Indeno(1.2.3-cd)Pyrene . „ 53-70-3 ——————— Dibenzo (a f h) Anthracene 191-24-2 —————— Benzo(q-.hr i) Perylene 2000 420 2000 2000 420 420 420 420 420 2000 2000 420 420 420 2000 420 420 420 420 420 420 840 420 420 510 420 420 420 420 . 420 420 420 U U U y- //**^^ *f U J Uuuuuuuuu uuuuuuu &(ff uu uuuuuuu (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine \V^^:-;--~VFORM i sv-2 - -,T,: --- .-.' "•-•'-".."";.--.:-..-;£££&'~^~/^^!^^^^^1^^^^:^^J^^y^^:-' •^k -:V::;±;i^^uiliffiS^^^^^SaMP/' f GROTTO "eScmaf-^ 1/87 Rev. ETP^XSsS TU r U4// QUALITY ASSURANCE NOTICE Specific guidelines arc presented in tha EPA CLP Organic Statement of Work for tha positive qualitative idantlflcation of compounds through mass apactral intarpratation. Applying these guidelines abtolutaly nay not ba poaiibla whan tha natura of tha sample ia laaa than pura rafaranca materiel. Vhara tha mass apactral pattarn of a compound to ba idantlfiad demonetrates intarfaraneaa or coalutlon from ona or more additional compound*, althar unknowna. Intamal atandardt. or aurrogata atandarda. tha '+* aign la addad to tha top of tha dual apactra paga. Robert E. Haiarar Vice Praaldant. Quality Assurance I ^ — SfWPLE Off TO POCKQBE 1305 TUT O01 0478 2. TRAFFIC R-P3STS oara TUT 001 0479 DETECTION LIMIT CALCULATION CLARIFICATION To protact our K columns from unnecessary contamination, soil samplas praparad according to Caucus Protocol methods art routinely dllutad 5:1. Through a series of axparlmants we hive determined that our Instrument Oatactlon Limit for pesticides 1s 5X lower than tha EPA Contract Required Quantltatlon Limit (CRQL). Ha, therefore, only adjust our detection Units if tha dilution ntcassary to analyla tha simple Is graatar thai) 5:1. If tha simple Is dllutad by a factor of X th% detection limit 1s adjusted by X Instead of X. 5 lob Nfiarar Olractor, Quality Assuranca Sf»HPL E TUT OO1 0480 ^^^^^ -'^^£: LABORATORY NOTICE On June 15, 1985 CompuChta Laboratorlts began adding 03-2,4-01nltrophtnol to •11 standards and samplts. Tht purpose of this addition Is to tnabl* the laboratory to have hlghtr and «ore conslsttnt analytical ttnt1t1v1ty for th* native 2,4-01n1troph*nol. Tht ptak corrtspondlng to tht dtuttrattd analog Is eltarly labtltd on tach RIC as 0311 and Mill not bt starchtd and rtporttd as a ttntatlvtly Idtntlfltd compound (TIC). This compound 1s not btlng ustd as an Internal or surrogatt standard. L. Ri( Ricnaro Flynn, Otvtlopntnt Chtnlst 006 Director of Quality Assuranct SAMPLE DP TO PPCKaeE t a- TUT OOl GOMPUCHEM lABORSTORJES QUALITY ABBTOAMCE NOTICE With the advent of the new organic* Statement of Work (SOW 2/88, .Revision: 9/88) participants in EPA's Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) are required to provide hard copy and diskette deliverable*. CompuChem employs the F^nnigan QA Formaster Program (Format A) to generate.^,/ these requirements using data files from our analytical instrumentation. Currently, and independently, quantitation reports are generated by the instruments and are used with CompuChem-developed software to calculate results. The GC and GC/MS quantitation routines employ the convention of carrying at least one extra significant figure until the mathematical computations are completed. Then, the quantitative results are rounded to the SOW-required number of significant figures for reporting. In addition, the algorithm used by the Formaster Program is slightly different than that employed in Compuchem's software routines. Therefore, results presented in the supportive data supplied with our deliverable* packages may be slightly different than those which appear on the hard copy forms generated via Formaster. This notice serves to alert the end users of these data packages as to the reason why slight differences may be ob*/ Robert E. Neierer Director of Quality Assurance COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC. PO. Box 12652 33WCttap«HM/N«wn Highway RMMrchTrlangtoPvt NC 27709 <»19)54»-M63 SRMPLE DPT a PPCKPBE QUALITY ASSURANCE NOTICE Specific guidelines ere presented in the EPA CLP Organic Statement of Work for the positive qualitative identification of compounds through ness spectral interpretation. Applying these guideline* absolutely nay not be possible when the nature of the sanple is less than pure reference Materiel. Uhere the ness spectral pattern of e compound to be identified demonstrates interferences er coelution from one or wore additional conpeunds. either unknowns, internal standards, or surrogate standards, the •+• eign is added to the top of the dual spectre pege. Robert E. Meierer Vice President. Ouelity Assurance 530 SAMPLE DPTa TUT O01 O483 GOMPUCHEM lABOR&TORES EPA CASE NARRATIVE — CASE 12058 SDG NO. BX258 Contract NO. 68-D9-0032 Compuchem Laboratories, Inc. Samples: BX258, BX259, BX261 PESTICIDES The pesticide fractions were extracted and analyzed within the proper holding time requirements. There were no reportable levels of EPA Target Compound Lists (TCL) compounds present in any of the samples. There were several outliers present in the %D column of the Form VIlls of the sequences included in this SDG. All outliers were associated with either hexane blanks or samples not included in this SDG. In the pesticide fractions, all recovery and RPD values passed QC limits. There were no reportable levels of TCL compounds found in the matrix spike, BX261MS, the matrix spike duplicate, BX261MSD, or the associated method blanks. Surrogate recovery values for the samples, blanks, and the MS/MSD passed contract required QC limits. All other data generated from the MS/MSD met QC acceptance criteria. I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer readable data submitted on floppy diskette has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as verified by the following signature: jjfln Cyntha E. Technical Reviewer" 21 June 1989 Note: This report is paginated for reference and ' accountability in decreasing numerical sequence. COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC. P.O. Box 12652 330B Chap* HIM/Nalson Highway Research Triangto Park. NC 27709 (919)549-8263 ,,;•--".- ' T U T 001 O484 GOMPUCHEM IABORMOR1ES dilution requirement that one analyte must be in the upper half of its analytical range. To protect the instrumentation and/or prevent detector saturation, the sample was not reanalyzed at a lesser dilution. A qualifier was included with the data. Two analyses of sample BX259 were reported and billed. In the initial low level 1 gram analysis, the level of tetrachloroethene exceeded the multipoint range. The sample was reanalyzed as a medium level at a 6.7:1 dilution which met dilution requirements. Both analyses were reported due to the loss of some compounds in the dilution. Surrogate recovery data were not available for BX259DL due to the dilution. Two analyses of sample BY773 were reported and billed. In the initial 5 gram low level analysis, the levels of ethyl- benzene and xylenes exceeded the multipoint range and indicated that a medium level analysis was required. The sample was reanalyzed as a medium level which was an acceptable dilution; however, the xylene levels did not compare well between the two analyses. It was concluded that the differences were due to a combination of sample inhomogeneity and the difference between the low level purge and trap and the medium level extraction procedure. Both analyses were reported with a qualifier. Surrogate and spike recovery data were not available for the medium level spikes, BX259DLMS/MSD due to the required dilution. The associated blank spike was reported which met all QC criteria. All surrogate recovery criteria were met except those mentioned above. The low level MS/MSD results were acceptable. All method blanks met QC criteria. SEMIVOLATILES: All semivolatile fractions were extracted and analyzed within holding time requirements. Each sample contained low levels of bis ( 2-ethylhexy 1) phthalate. Sample BX25S also contained a low level of phenol. Each sample contained several tentatively identified compounds, some of which were attributable to blank contaminants or aldol condensation. All surrogate recovery criteria were met. The QC matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate results were acceptable. I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer-readable data submitted on floppy diskette has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as verified by the following signature. Note: This report was paginated for reference and accountability in decreasing numerical sequence. C . Janet C. Garrett 6-29-89 Technical Reviewer COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC. P.O. Box 12652 3308 Chapel Hill/Nelson Highway Research Triangle Park, N' TUT 001 0485 GOMPUCHEM LABORATORIES EPA CASE NARRATIVE—CASEl 12058 Contract No. 68-D9-0032 SDGI BX258 CompuChem Laboratories, Inc. Sample Numbers: BX258 BX259 BX261 BY702 BY703 BY704 BY705 BY707 BY709 BY711 BY712 BY713 BY765 BY769 BY770 BY771 BY772 BY773 BY774 BY775 This portion of Case 112058 consisted of 3 soil samples for volatile, semivolatile, and pesticide analysis and 17 soil samples for volatile only analysis. The samples were received on 6-7-89, 6-12-89, and 6-14-89 via USPS Express Mail in properly sealed shipping containers with traffic reports. Several discrepancies were noted upon receipt of the samples. Samples BX258, BX259, and BX261 did not require full analysis according to the traffic reports. SMO was contacted and the samples were put on hold until 6-8-89 when CompuChem was notified that the samples required full analysis; therefore, the receipt date on Forms I for these three samples was 6-8-89. Two soil VOAs were received for sample BY775 which were not listed on the traffic report or chain-of-custody document. Sample BY765 was missing 2-BOoz. amber liters. CompuChem was instructed by SMO to note the discrepancies on the traffic reports and proceed with the analysis of the samples, volume permitting. The pH values of the samples were within the range specified in EPA protocols. Moisture content of the samples ranged from 11% to 24%. The remaining portion of this narrative pertains only to the volatile and semivolatile sections of the case. VOLATILES: All volatile fractions were analyzed within holding time require- ments. All samples contained TCL compounds at various levels. Tentatively identified compounds were present in most of the samples at very high levels. Samples BY703, BY704, BY705, BY707, BY709, BY711, BY712, BY713, BY765, and BY771 each were analyzed as medium level soils, some at dilutions. None of these analyses met the dilution requirement that at least one analyte be present in the upper half of its analytical range. To protect the instrumentation and/or prevent detector saturation, the samples were not reanalyzed at a lesser dilution. Qualifiers were included with each sample. Sample BX261 required a medium level analysis at a dilution due to the high level of tetrachloroethene present. Surrogate recovery data were not available due to the dilution. Sample BY770 required a medium level analysis at a dilution due to the high level of xylenes present. Surrogate recovery data were not available due to the dilution. Sample BY702 was analyzed as a low level using only 1 gram. This analysis did not meet the ,. COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC. P.O. Box 12652 3306 Chaprt HID/Nelson Highway R«March Triangle Park. ' - U ' - - - : : - " • • - -2* TUT O01 0486 ' ' • ~ 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM TABS________._ Lab Code: COMPD case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ( Level: (low/mad) LOW % Moisture: not dec. BX258 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 Column: (pack/cap) CAP CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 266347____ Lab File ID: GHQ66347A18 Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Analyzed: 06/10/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/KG 74-87-3——•————Chloromethane____________ 74-83-9—•——•———Bromomethane_______________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane____________ 75-09-2——*———Methylene Chloride________ 67-64-1———————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3-———:—--Chloroform______________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________ 78-9 3-3———————2 -Butanone_______________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride______ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate___________ 75-27-4-——————Bromodichloromethane_______ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane________ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene____ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene___________ 124-48-1—————Dibromochlorome thane______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43-2———————Benzene_________________ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene___ 75-25-2——————Bromoform______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6—————-2-Hexanone_______________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___ 108-88-3——————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene____________ 100-42-5—————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes___________ 11 11 11 11 27 80 6 6 6 6 2 6 11 6 6 11 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 11 11 58 6 6 6 66 6 FORM I VOA "" SOHPLE OffTff PPCKQBE Us 1/87 Rev. ss^^' 001 0487 IB SEHIVOIATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_______ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12056 SAS No.: Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) fi__ Level: (low/ned) LOW % Moisture: not dec. _H dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONG GPC Cleanups (Y/H) .H_ pH: Contract: 68-D9-0032 BX258 SDG NO.: BX2S8 Lab Sample ID: 266347____ Lab File ID: GH066347B04 Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Extracted: Q6/O9/89 Date Analyzed: Q6/09/89 Dilution Factor: i.oo CAS NO. CONCENTRATION (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG' •) 108-95-2 ——— 111-44-4 ——— 95-57-8 ----- 541-73-1 —— - 106-46-7 -—— 100-51-6 ——— 95-50-1 —— ~ 95-48-7 ----- 39638-32-9 — 106-44-5 —— - 621-64-7 —— - 67-72-1 ----- 98-95-3 —— — 78-59-1 —— — 88-75-5 ----- 105-67-9 —— - 65-85-0 ----- 111-91-1 —— - 120-83-2 —— - 120-82-1 —— - 91-20-3 ----- 106-47-8 ——— 87-68-3 ———— 59-50-7 ———— 88-06-2 ----- 95-95-4 —— — 91-58-7 ----- 88-74-4 ----- 131-11-3 ——— 606-20-2 ——— ——— Phenol ——— bisf2-Chloroethyl)Ether ——— 2 -Chlorophenol ——— 1.4-Dichlorobenzene —— Benzyl Alcohol ——— 1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene ——— 2-Methylphanol —— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether _ ——— 4-Methylphenol —— -N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __ ——— 2f 4-Dimethylphanol .. .., ,. , - —— Benzoic Acid ——— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __ ——— 1 . 2 , 4-Trichlorobenzene —— Naohthalene ——— 4-Chloroaniline ——— Hexachlorobutadiene . ——— 4-Chloro-3 -Methylohenol ——— Hexachlorocyclopentadiene —— 2-Nitroaniline ——— Dimethyl Phthalat* • — •— Acenaphthylene ——— 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene 39 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 1800 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 1800 370 1800 370 370 370 ^t f*"J U Uuuuuuouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuau a - - uu FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev. -^• :-^&:-:^^^?*-!3K*^ ~-~ : -'• - •- sfiHPLE OPTP PPCKQBE *&&?& -'- J^^f3«^S££5^^^*- :: 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM Contract: 68-D9-0032 BX258 Lab Code: CQMPO Case No.: 12058 SAS No.: Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) fi__ Level: (low/mad) LOW % Moisture: not dec. _U, dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONG GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N._ pH: SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: 266347____ Lab File ID: GH066347B04 Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Extracted: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/09/89 Dilution Factor: 1.00 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) 99-09-2 ——————— 3 -Nitroanil ine 83-32 -9 ——————— Acenaphthene 51-28-5 ——————— 2 . 4-Dinitrophenol 100-02 -7 —————— 4 -Nitrophenol 132-64-9 —————— Dibenzofuran 121-14-2 —————— 2 P 4-Dinitrotoluene 84-66-2 ——————— Diethylphthalate .. _ 7005-72-3 ————— 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether __ 86-73-7 —————— Fluorene „. 100-01-6 —————— 4 -Nitroanil ine 534-52 - 1 —————— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2 -Methy iphenol 86-30-6 —————— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) __ 101-55-3 —————— 4 -Bromopheny 1 -pheny lether ___ 118-74-1 —————— Hexachlorobenzene . 120-12-7 ——————— Anthracene 84-7 4-2 ——————— Di-n-Buty Iphthalate 206-44-0—— ——— -Fluoranthene 129-00-0 —————— Pyrene ., .... ,. 85-68-7 ——————— Butylbenzylphthalate 91-94-1 ——————— 3 , 3 ' -Dichlorohenz id ine 56-55-3 ——————— Benzo (a) Anthracene ,, .... ., ._. 218-01-9 ————— — Chrysene 117-81-7 ————— bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 117-84-0 —————— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate _ _ , . . _ 205-99-2 —————— Benzo (b) Pluoranthene 207-08-9 —————— Benzo (x) Fluoranthene 50-32-8 ——————— Benzo (a) Pyrene 19 3-39-5 —————— Indeno ( 1 , 2 f 3 -cd ) Pyrene 53-70-3 ——————— Dibenzo (a fh) Anthracene _ 191-24-2 ——————— Benzo(qfhri)Perylene 1800 370 1800 1800 370 370 370 370 370 1800 1800 370 370 370 1800 370 370 370 370 370 370 740 370 370 280 370 . 370 370 370 370 370 - •- *• *7/\ u uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu^ •^T^ J**! uuuuuuu (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Coda: COMPO case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) J Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 11 Column: (pack/cap) CAP BX258MS Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS NO.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: 266437_____ Lab File ID: GR066437C10 Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Analyzed: 06/13/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———•••—Bromome thane__________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone____;__________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1.1-Dichloroethane 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform_____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3--—————•2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———•———Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———•—Benzene______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromof orm______________ 108-10-1——————4 -Methyl-2 -Pentanone____ 591-78 -6—————2 -Hexanone___________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5<——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3--————-Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——-———Chlorobenzene_____________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene_____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene__________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 11 11 11 11 19 11 6 6 6 6 2 6 11 6 6 11 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 11 11 17 6 6 6 6 6 6 U U U U B U U U U UJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SBMPLE DPTa PRCKBGE JUT 001 0490 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) $ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. BX258MSD Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX25JL Column: (pack/cap) CAP CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 266438_____ Lab File ID: GRQ66438C1Q Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Analyzed: 06/13/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromome thane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroe thane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1——————Acetone______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane_________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———•———Chloroform____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________ 78-93-3—•————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________ 75-27-4-——————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——•—•——Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-4 3-2———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2-——-——Bromoforn____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6—————2-Hexanone___________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene_________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5—————Styrene________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes______________ 11 11 11 11 12 116 66 6 6 6 11 6 6 11 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 11 11 19 6 6 6 6 6 6 U U U U B U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SPMPLE ~DRTP PBCKB8E - TUT 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM Lab Code: COMPO Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: l.Q (g/mL) J Level: (lov/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 Column: (pack/ cap) CAP Contract: 68-D9-0032 BX259 SAS No. SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: 266348____ Lab File ID: GRQ66348C1Q Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Analyzed: 06/13/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION OMITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) PC/KG 74-87-3 ————— —Chl or one thane __________ • 74-83-9 —————— Bromonethane _______________ 75-01-4 —————— Vinyl Chloride ___________ 75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethane ______________ 75-09-2 —————— Methylene Chloride ________ 67-64-1 ——————— Acetone ___________________ 75-15-0 —————— Carbon Disulfide _________ 75-35-4 —————— 1, 1-Dichloroethene ________ 75-34-3 ——————— 1, 1-Dichloroethane ________ 540-59-0 ————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ 67-66-3 —————— Chloroform ______________ 107-06-2 ————— 1,2-Dichloroethane ________ 78-93-3 —————— 2-Butanone ______________ 71-55-6 —————— 1,1, l-Trichloroethane ______ 56-23-5 —————— Carbon Tetrachloride ______ 108-05-4 ————— Vinyl Acetate ___________ 75-27-4 —— • ——— Bromodichloromethane _______ 78-87-5— — — — — 1, 2-Dichloropropane _______ 10061-01-5 ———— cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene _____ 79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene ___________ 124-48-1 —————— Dibromochlorome thane _______ 79-00-5 ——————— 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane ______ 71-43-2 ——————— Benzene _______________ 10061-02-6—— ——Trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene ___ 75-25-2 ——————— Bromoform _______________ 108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone _______ 591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanone _______________ 127-18-4 ————— Tetrachloroethene 79-34-5 ——————— 1.1. 2. 2-Tetrachloroethane 108-88-3 —————— Toluene 108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene 100-41-4 ————— Ethylbenzene 100-42-5 —————— Styrene 1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenes__ ___________ 62 62 62 62 150 84 31 31 31 20 12 31 62 31 31 62 31 31 31 75 3 1 31 31 3 1 31 62 62 31 31 31 31 31 31 FORM I VOA '•TV- "*-»* *>>~ U ••- U". U . J T J.T U -.• U ' Uu: U U « U U U U < U U " U U o ••/ U U U ? u .• 1/87 Rev. PPCKPSE TUT 001 049 ' 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPTJCHEM LABS Contract: 68-D9-Q032 BX259 Lab Cod*: CQMPU Case No.: 12058 SAS No.: SDG No.: BX258 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) Level: (lov/ned) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 dec. pH: COMPOUND Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONG GPC Cleanup: (Y/H) Lab Sample ID: 266348____ Lab File ID: GJQ66348B04 Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Extracted: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/09/89 Dilution Factor: 1.00 CAS NO. CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 99-09-2 ———— 83-32-9 ———— 51-28-5 —— -- 100-02-7 ——— 132-64-9 ——— 121-14-2 ——— 84-66-2 ———— 7005-72-3 —— 86-73-7 ———— 100-01-6 ——— 534-52-1 ——— 86-30-6 ———— 101-55-3 ——— 118-74-1 ——— 87-86-5 ———— 85-01-8 ———— 120-12-7 ——— 84-74-2 ———— 206-44-0 ——— 129-00-0 ——— 85-68-7 ———— 56-55-3 ———— 117-81-7 ——— 117-84-0 ——— 205-99-2 ——— 207-08-9 ——— 50-32-8 ———— 193-39-5 ——— 191-24-2 ——— ——— 3-Nitroaniline ——— Acenaphthene ——— 2 . 4-Dinitrophenol —— 4-Nitrophenol ——— Dibenzofuran ——— 2 . 4 -Dinitro toluene , —— »4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether __ ——— 4 -Nitroanil ine —— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol —— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) __ — — Hexachlorobenzene ——Anthracene ——— Butylbenzylphthalate , ——— Benzo fa) Anthracene —— -bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate __ ——— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate ——— Benzo fbiFluoranthene . , — — Benzo (It) Fluoranthene ——— Indeno(lr2.3-cd)Pyrene , _,, ... . ——— Dibenzo (a r h) Anthracene ——— Benzo fq.h,i)Perylene 2000 410 2000 2000 410 410 410 410 410 2000 20OO 410 410 410 2000 410 410 410 410 410 410 820 410 410 390 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 U l Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uauuuuu (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine ,^-:-~' '• .-.~:'~I---.— » '-•--V~?^.** :".«. FORM I SV-2 .1/87 Rev. :*K'- -•- " * ^-'-'S- • . -•. :--,-. - .:,»*•••-..-, •:-'-• •:- :•-,— ^':-/-"'^-V?-xJ^8*j5Sj5 PPCKBBE t T1IT £&&3$ rUT IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______ Contract: 68-D9-0032 EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_______ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 SAS No.: Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/nL) fi__ Level: (low/ned) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONG GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: BX259MS SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: 266434____ Lab File ID: GJQ66434AQ4 Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Extracted: Q6/O9/89 Date Analyzed: Qfi/io/89 Dilution Factor: 1.00 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG;^ 108-95-2——————Phenol____________________ 111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether____ 95-57-8——————2-Chlorophenol___________ 541-73-1—————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_______ 106-46-7———•—-1,4-Dichlorobenzene________ 100-51-6——•——Benzyl Alcohol___________ 95-50-1——————1,2-Dichlorobenzene________ 95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol____________ 39638-32-9————bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether_ 106-44-5—————4-Methylphenol___________ 621-64-7—————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine__ 67-72 -1——————Hexachl oroe thane_________ 98-9 5-3 ——————Nitrobenzene____________ 78-59-1———————Isophorone_______________ 88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol_____________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol________ 65-85-0————•——Benzoic Acid____________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-ChlQroethoxy) Methane__ 120-83-2——————•£, 4 -Dichlorophenol________ 120-82-1—————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____ 91-20-3——————Naphthalene_____________ 106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline__________ 87-68-3 ——————Hexachlorobut adiene_______ 59-50-7——————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol____ 91-57-6——————2-Methylnaphthalene_______ 77-47-4——————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene___ 88-06-2———————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95-4——————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7——————2-Chloronaphthalene_______ 88-74-4——————2-Nitroaniline___________ 131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate________ 208-96-8—————Acenaphthylene___________ 606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene________ 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 43 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 2000 410 2000 410 410 410 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I SV-1 -• ."" -.. . , - v - :^s=."-"- ^ r; '— "•-'•- ra 1/87 Rev. TUT 001 0494 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPPCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: CQMPO case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) Q.__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. _12 dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) H_ pH: BX259MS Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: 266434____ Lab File ID: GJ066434A04 Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Extracted: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/10/89 Dilution Factor: 1.00 ;. :-fci^^z-;^ ^.^^^ •r: " -— - - ^ii'k. ' <-•'•:••*" -'•*~-:zZ~***.' CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 99-09-2 ——— 83-32-9 ——— E ^ ** O E 100-02-7 —— 132-64-9 —— 191 — 1 4_9___ 84-66-2 ——— 7005-72-3 — 86-73-7 ——— 100-01-6 —— 534-52-1 —— 86-30-6 ——— 101-55-3 —— 118-74-1 —— 87-86-5 ——— 85-01-8 ——— 120-12-7 —— 84-74-2 ——— ——— 3-Nitroaniline ——— Acenaphthene ——— 2.4-Dinitrophenol ——— 4-Nitrophenol ——— Dibenzo furan ———— 2r4-Dinitrotoluene ———— Diethylphthalate ———— 4 -Nitroanil ine ——— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol __ ——— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) __ ———— Di-n-ButvlDhthalate 206-44-0 —————— Fluoranthene 129-00-0 —— 85-68-7 ——— 91-94-1 ——— 56-55-3 ——— 218-01-9 —— 117-81-7 —— 117-84-0 —— 205-99-2 —— 207-08-9 —— 50-32-8 ——— 193-39-5 —— 53-70-3 ——— 191-24-2 —— ——— Pvrene ———— Butvlbenzvlphthalate ----- 3 , 3 ' -Dichlorobenz idine _ —— —Benzo (a) Anthracene _ ——— Chrysene ——— bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate __ ———— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate ———— Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ———— Benzo ( Jc) Fluoranthene ~ —— Benzo ( a ) Pyrene ———— Indeno(lP2f3-cd)Pyrene „ ., ———— Dibenzo (a. . h) Anthracene ——— Benzo(qrhri)Perylene . 2000 410 2000 2000 410 410 410 410 410 2000 2000 410 410 410 2000 410 410 49 410 410 410 820 410 410 420 410 410 410 410 . 410 410 86 Uu UuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJuuuauu uuuuuuJ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine TUT 001 0495 IB SEMTVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. BX259MSO Lab Name: COMPPCHEM TABS_________ Contract: 6B-D9-0032 Lab Code: COMPU case No.: 12058 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX258 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 3Q.Q (g/»L) fi__ Levels (lov/ned) LOW % Moisture: not dec. _13. dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONG GPC Cleanup: fv/N) J|_ pH: Lab Sample ID: 266435____ Lab File ID: G3J66435A04 Date Received: 06/08/89 Bate Extracted: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: Q6/11/B9 Dilution Factor: 1.00 GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 108-95-2——————Phenol_________________ 111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether____ 95-57-8——•————2-Chlorophenol____________ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene________ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene________ 100-51-6—————Benzyl Alcohol___________ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-48-7——————2-Methylphenol_______________ 39638-32-9————bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether_ 106-44-5—————4-Methylphenol___________ 621-64-7—————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine__ 67-72-1———————Hexachloroethane__________ 98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene_____________ 78-59-1———————Xsophorone______________•_ 88-75-5———————2-Kitrophenol___________ 105-67-9—————2,4-Dimethylphenol________ 65-85-O——————Benzoic Acid____________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__ 120-83-2—————2,4-Dichlorophenol________ 120-82-1—————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____ 91-2 0-3 ——————Naphthalene_____________ 106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline__________ 87-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene_______ 59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol____ 91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene_______ 77-47-4———————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene___ 88-06-2-—————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene________ 88-74-4——————2-Nitroaniline___________ 131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate________ 208-96-8—————Acenaphthylene___________ 606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene________ 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 2000 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 410 2000 410 2000 410 410 410 FORM I SV-1 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu Rev. 001 0496 "--T"*S5?i; *£>' -•".---..*38S .-—rr^r js^T;^... i_=-.-^^? 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: COMPU case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) fi__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONG GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: BX2S9MSD Contract: 68-D9-Q032 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX2S8 Lab Sample ID: 266435____ Lab File ID: C3J6643SA04 Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Extracted: Q6/09/89 Date Analyzed: Q6/H/89 Dilution Factor: 1.00 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 99-09-2 ——————— 3-Nitroaniline 83-32-9 ——————— Acenaphthene 51-28-5 ——————— 2r4-Dinitrophenol 100-02-7 —————— 4-Nitrophenol 132-64-9 —————— Dibenzofuran ,.,. 121-14-2 —————— 2 . 4-Dinitrotoluene 84-66-2 ——————— Diethylphthalate . . 7005-72-3 ————— 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether __ 100-01-6 —————— 4-Nitroaniline 534-52-1 —————— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol __ 86-30-6 —————— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) __ 101-55-3 ————— 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether ___ 118-74-1 —————— Hexachlorobenzene 120-12-7 —————— Anthracene 84-74-2 ——————— Di-n-Buty Iphthalate 206-44-0 —————— Fluoranthene 129-00-0 —————— Pyrene 85-68-7 ——————— Butylbenzylphthalate , , . , . _ „ . 91-94-1 ——————— 3,3'-Dichlorob«nzidine 218-01-9 —————— Chrysene 117-81-7 ————— bi»(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate __ 117-84-0 —————— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 205-99-2 —————— Benzo(b)Fluoranthene . . . . 207-08-9 —————— Benzo(k)Fluoranthene . ,_ „ , 50-32-8 ——————— Benzo(a) Pyrene 193-39-5 —————— Indeno ( 1 f 2 e 3-cd) Pyrene 53-70-3 ——————— Dibenzo( a. h) Anthracene 191-24-2 —————— Benzo(g.h.i)Perylene . 2000 410 2000 2000 410 410 410 410 410 2000 2000 410 410 410 2000 410 410 83 410 410 410 820 410 410 510 410 410 410 410 410 410 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJuuuuuu uuuuuaJ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylanine 1/87 Rev. '• -. •-"•' ~v"^^yv-»"" ,V- ft1. . •" •- -*•*•- - - - • > • . . - - - • SAMPLE DPTP PPCKP6E •'•>.... ~~-,..• i1^-«-* 1*i3i£-'•/»-•'--?-•••-:£& ,=»•••?",:!?""~fc«a ~-?s™ '. ** -rr*i~nrwK: TUT O01 O497 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______ Contract: 68-D9-0032 EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. 19 Column: (pack/cap) CAP BX259DLMS SAS No.: SDG No.: BX2S8 Lab Sample ID: 26fiaa3 Lab File ID: CR066883C23 Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: 6.7_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UC/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________' 74-83-9——————Bromomethane_____________ 75-01-4——————vinyl Chloride____________________ 75-00-3 ——————Chloroethane_____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride________ 67-64-1———————Acetone_____________________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide____________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3-——-——Chloroform___________________ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane________ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone__________________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride_______ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate___________ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane____________ 10061-01-5--——cis-l,3-Dichloropropene____ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_______________ 124-48-1—•—-—Dibromochloromethane__________ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-4 3-2——————Benzene________________________ 10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene___ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_______________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_____________ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___ 108-88-3—•———-Toluene________________________ 108-90-7 ——•—-—Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_____________ 100-42-5—————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________- 10000 10000 10000 10000 2300 10000 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 10000 5100 5100 10000 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 10000 10000 180000 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 U U U U BDJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U D U U U U U U FORM I VOA DPT ft PPCKQ6E • i'-/- iv.~ •-.»—iSVX-rrV-._--^- '-;•.. — ''tvi"-;' --~-J»-:V"--'.".- j-*"•:.-* Si^S^^^ISM^^K^ 1/87 Rev. TUT 001 O49S 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPOCHEM LABS________r Lab Coda: COMTO case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) J Level: (low/Bed) MED % Moisture: not dec. 19 Column: (pack/cap) CAP BX259DLMSD Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: 266884____ Lab File ID: CRO66884C23 Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: 6.7____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG 74-87-3 ——————— Chloromethana 74-83 -9 ——————— Bromome thane 75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride 75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethane 75-09-2 —— r ——— Methvlene Chloride 67-64-1 ——————— Acetone 75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4 ——————— 1.1-Dichloroethene, 75-34-3 ——————— 1. 1-Dichloroethane 540-59-0 —————— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __ 107-06-2 —————— 1.2-Dichloroethane 71-55-6 ——————— 1.1. 1-Trichloroethane 56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride 108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acetate 75-27-4 ——————— Bromodichloromethane 10061-01-5 ————— cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene 79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene , 124-48-1 —————— Diluroaochloromethane 79-00-5 ——————— 1,1,2-Trichloroethane _ _ 71-43-2 ——————— Benzene 10061-02-6 ———— Trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene____ 75— 25— 2"™— — ••— — — HronoC on 591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanona__. _ 127-18-4 ————— -Tetrachloroethene ..,_. ._ .,_ 79-34-5 —————— 1,1,2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ 108-88-3 -————-Toluene 108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene 100-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene 100-42-5 —————— Styrene 1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenea 10000 10000 10000 10000 2500 10000 , 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 10000 5100 5100 10000 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 10000 10000 170000 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100, uuuu BDJ U U U U U U U U U Uuuuuuuuuuuuu Duuuuuu FORM I VGA •jf'Vs t,-'*.'.\ :^J^;'^ •••' 1/87 Rev. ..__. .SPMPLE :OPTP PPCKPQE ± 0499 ^v^:-C;,.^-^^ggg^^^^s^:-^;': -:,.--- v-- !U1 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE N Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: COMPIT case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP BX260 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS NO.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266346____ Lab File ID: CN066346A10 Date Received: Q6/Q7/89 Date Analyzed: 06/11/89 Dilution Factor: l.Q____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3 ——————— Chloromethane 75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride 75-00-3 —— - ——— Chloroethane 75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride 67-64-1 ——————— Acetone 75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4 ——————— lrl-Dichloroethene 75-34-3 ——————— 1.1-Dichloroethane . . 540-59-0 ——— • —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ 107-06-2 —————— 1.2-Dichloroethane 71-55-6 ———————— lTlTl-Trichloroethan« 56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride . . 108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acetate 75-27-4- — —— —— Bromodichloromethane 78-87-5 ——————— 1.2-Dichloropropane j: . _ 10061-01-5 ————— cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene 79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene 79-OO-5 ——————— 1 f 1 f 2-Trichloroethane 75-25-2—— —— —— Bromoform 108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanone 127-18-4 —————— Tetrachloroethene 79-34-5 ——————— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane 108-88-3 —————— Toluene . , , 108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene 100-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene 100-42-5 —————— Styrene 1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenes 10 10 10 -•% 10 ^-*-v 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 55 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U U U U U U Uauuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Re- - . SBHPLE DQTP osoo IB • SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. /* Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS Contract: 68-D9-Q032 BX260 Lab Code: COMPU case No.: 12058 SAS No.: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: IQQQ (g/nL) ML_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) fi_ pH: ____ SDG NO.: BX26Q Lab Sample ID: 266346____ Lab File ID: GHQ66346A20 Date Received: 06/07/89 Date Extracted: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/11/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UC/L 108-95-2 —— 111-44-4 —— 95-57-8 ——— 541-73-1 —— 106-46-7 —— 100-51-6 —— 95-50-1 ——— 95-48-7 ——— 39638-32-9- 106-44-5 —— 621-64-7 —— 67-72-1 ——— 78-59-1 ——— 88-75-5 ——— 105-67-9 —— 65-85-0 ——— 111-91-1 —— 120-83-2 —— 120-82-1 —— 91-20-3 ——— 106-47-8 —— 87-68-3 ——— 59-50-7 —— • 91-57-6 ——— 77-47-4 —— - 88-06-2 —— - 95-95-4 —— • 91-58-7 ——— 88-74-4 —— • 131-11-3 — • 208-96-8 — - 606-20-2 — • ——— Phenol ———— bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether , ——— 1.4-Dichlorobenzene , . ——— 1. 2-Dichlorobenzene ——— 2-Methvlphenol ——— b is (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether _ ——— 4 -Me thy Iphenol ——— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __ ——— Hexachloroe thane ——— Isophorone ——— 2-Nitrophenol • ——— 2 . 4-Dimethylphenol • ——— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __ • ——— 2 , 4-Dichlorophenol — ——— Hexachlorobutadiene • ——— 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol . , „ • ——— 2 -Methylnaphthalene • ——— Rexachlorocyclopentadiene ___ • ——— 2 . 4 . 6-Trichlorophenol • ——— 2 . 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol • ——— 2-Chloronaphthalene — —— —2-Mitroanil ine ———— Diaethyl Phtnalat* ———— Acenaohthylene • —— « — 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu - uuuuu u , FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev. SPMPLE DQTP PBCKQBE ' - TUT OO1 0501 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Contract: 68-D9-OQ32 Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 SAS No.: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1QQO (g/mL) ML Level: (lov/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SapF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) fi_ pH: ____ EPA SAMPLE NO. BX260 SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266346____ Lab File ID: CHQ66346A2Q Date Received: 06/07/89 Date Extracted: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/11/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline___________ 83-32-9——-————Acenaphthene____________ 51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol_________ 100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol____________ 132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran____________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene________ 84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate_________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether__ 86-73 -7——————Fluorene___\___________ 100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline___________ 534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol__ 86-30-6——————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)__ 101-55-3——•—•—4-Bromophenyl-phenylether___ 118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_________ 87-86-5——————Pentachlorophenol_________ 85-01-8——————Phenanthrene____________ 120-12-7—————Anthracene______________ 84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate_______ 206-44 -o—————Fluoranthene____________ 129-00-0—————Pyrane_________________ 85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate______ 91-94-1——————3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine_____ 56-55-3——————Benzo (a) Anthracene________ 218-01-9——•——-Chrysene____;________• 117-81-7—————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate__ 117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate_______ 205-99-2—————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene______ 207-08-9——————Benzo (Jc) Fluoranthene_______ 50-32-8—————-Benzo (a) Pyrene___________ 193-39-5——————Indeno(l, 2,3-cd) Pyrene_____ 53-70-3———————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene_____ 191-24-2—————Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene______ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamina 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab N : COMPUCHEM LABS Lab Cod*: COMPU Case Mo.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) J Level: (low/Bed) MED % Moisture: not dec. 2j. Column: (pack/cap) CAP BX261 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS NO.: ______ SDG No.: BX2S8 Lab Sample ID: 266349____ Lab File ID: C2R66349C23 Date Received: 06/08/89 Date Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: 6.7____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-37-3——————Chloromethane___________ 74 -8 3 -9——————Bronomathane____________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3——-———Chloroethane___________________ 75-09-2——————Mathylana Chloride________ 67-64-1——————Acetone__________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ £7-66-3——.———Chloroform_____________________ 107-06-2—————1,2 -Dichloroethane________ 7€-9 3 -3 ————•——2 -Butanone___________________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______ 5€-2 3 -5——————Carbon Tetrachloride__________ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane______ 78-8 7-5——————1,2 -Dichloropropane________ 10O61-01-5--——>-cis-l,3-Dichloropropene____ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene__________ 124-48-1—————DibroDochloromethane______ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane_______ 71-43-2 ——————Benzene_____________________ 1OO61-02-6-———»Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_____ 75-25-2——————Brovoxorai_____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone________ 591-78-6—————2-Hexanone_____________________ 127 -18 -4 —————Tetrachl oroet hene_________ 79-34-5——————lf 1,2,2-Tetra Chloroethane___ 1O8-88-3——————Toluene_________________ 108 -90-7 ————Chloroben z ene____________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes____________ 11000 11000 11000 11000 5300 11000 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 11000 5300 5300 11000 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 11000 •11000 170000 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 Uu Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuu FORM I VGA 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABg_________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/nL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP CAS NO. COMPOUND BX991MSD Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: • SDG No.: BX26Q Lab Sample ID: 266429_____ Lab File ID: CN066429A10 Date Received: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/12/89 Dilution Factor: 1.Q_____ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L 74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________ 74-83 -9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——-———Chloroform___________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5——————l, 2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2 ———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5—————styrene_______ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 10 3 31 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Uu UuJ uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. TUT 001 0504 SBMPLE DOTa PBCK06E 1 3^ 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET _______ Contract: 68-D9-0032 EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP CAS NO. COMPOUND BX991MS SAS No.: SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266428 Lab File ID: CN066428A10 Date Received: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/12/89 Dilution Factor: 1.6_____ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83 -9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4————-—Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————-Chloroe thane____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1——————Acetone___________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5——————l, l, 2-Trichloroethane___ 71-4 3-2——————Benzene______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2-——————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 10 2 29 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U U U UJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SAMPLE DflTQ PBCKPGE "UT 001 05O5 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABff_________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 500 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/ned) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) M_ pH: ___ BX994MS contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266722____ Lab File ID: GH066722BQ6 Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Extracted: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/12/89 Dilution Factor: 0.50 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 111-44-4 ———— 541-73-1 ———— 106-46-7 ———— 100-51-6 ———— 95-50-1 ————— 106-44-5 ———— 621-64-7 ———— 67-72-1 ————— 105-67-9 ———— 65-85-0 ————— 111-91-1 ———— 120-83-2 ———— 120-82-1 ———— 91-20-3 ————— 106-47-8 ———— 59-50-7 ————— 91-57-6 ———— - 77-47-4 ————— 88-06-2 ———— - 95-95-4 ———— - 91-58-7 ———— - 88-74-4 ———— - 131-11-3 ——— - 606-20-2 ——— • —— Phenol —— bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether —— 2 -Chlorophenol —— 1, 3-Dichlorobenzene —— 1,4-Dichlorobenzene —— Benzyl Alcohol —— 1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene —— 2-Methylphenol —— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether —— 4 -Methylphenol —— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine. __ —— Hexachloroethane —— Nitrobenzene —— Isophorone —— 2-Nitroohenol —— 2 . 4-Dimethylphenol —— Benzoic Acid • —— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __ • —— 2 . 4-Dichlorophenol • —— 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene • —— Naph thai ene • —— 2-Methylnaphthalene • —— 2 . 4 . 6-Trichlorophenol • —— 2 . 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol - —— 2 -Nitroani 1 ine - —— Dimethyl Phthalate 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 4 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev. SQMPLE D0TP PPCK0GE TUT 001 0506 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE Lab Name: COMPOCHEM LABS__________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 SAS No. Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 500 (9/nL) ML Level: (low/ned) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: ____ Contract: 68-D9-0032 BX994MS SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266722______ Lab File ID: GH066722B06 Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Extracted: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/12/89 Dilution Factor: 0.50 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L -3-Nitroaniline. -Acenaphthene_ -2,4-Dinitrophenol. -4-Nitrophenol___ -Dibenzofuran____ -2,4-Dinitrotoluene -Diethylphthalate. •4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ -Fluorene_____________ 99-09-2————— 83-32-9———— 51-28-5———— 100-02-7——— 132-64-9———— 121-14-2———- 84-66-2———— 7005-72-3——— 86-73-7———— 100-01-6———- 534-52-1———- 86-30-6————- 101-55-3———• 118-74-1———- 87-86-5————- 85-01-8————• 120-12-7———- 84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate_______ 206-44-0—————-Fluoranthene_____________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene________________ 85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1———————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3--—————Benzo(a)Anthracene______ 218-01-9——————Chrysene______________ 117-81-7——————bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate_ 117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____ 205-99-2——————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene_____ 2O7-08-9—————Benzo(k) Fluoranthene_____ 50-32-8——•———• Benzo (a) Pyrene__________ 193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) Pyrene___ 53-70-3——————Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene___ 191-24-2—————Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene____ -4-Nitroaniline____________ -4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol. -N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1). -4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ -Hexachlorobenzene_______ -Pentachloropheno1_______ -Phenanthrene___________ -Anthracene_____________ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu .FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev. SOMPLE OPTP PPCKPGE TUT CO i- 05 07 IB SEMIVOIATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NC Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 500 (g/nL) ML Level: (low/Bed) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: ___ BX994MSO Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266723____ Lab File ID: GH066723B06 Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Extracted: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/12/89 Dilution Factor: 0.50 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 108-95-2——————Phenol 111-44-4—————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether 95-57-8——————2-Chlorophenol 541-73-1—————1,3-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene 100-51-6—————Benzyl Alcohol 95-50-1—————1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-48-7——————2-Methylphenol 39638-32-9————bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether 106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol 621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine__ 67-72-1———————Hexachloroethane_________ 98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene____________ 78-59-1———————Isophorone______________ 88-75-5——————2-Nitrophenol___________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol_______ 65-85-0——————Benzoic Acid 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol_______ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene____ 91-20-3 ——————Naphthalene____________ 106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline_________ •7-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene________ 59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol___ 91-57-6——————2-Methylnaphthalene______ 77-47-4-—————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene__ 86-06-2——————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol____ 95-95-4——————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol____ 91-58-7——————2-Chloronaphthalene______ 88-74-4——————2-Nitroaniline___________ 131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate_______ 2,03-96-8—————Acenaphthylene_________ 606-20-2—————2,6-Dinitrotoluene______ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 4 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 SO 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuu uuuuJuuuauuuuuuuuuuuuu PORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev. POCKPGE TU1 (-"- )J'- O5OQ 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. BX994MSO Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Contract: 68-D9-0032 Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 500 (9/mL) ML Level: (lov/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) fl_ pH: ___. Lab Sample ID: 266723____ Lab File ID: GH066723B06 Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Extracted: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/12/89 Dilution Factor: O.SO CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) 99-09-2 ——— 83-32-9 ——— 51-28-5 ——— 100-02-7 —— 132-64-9 —— 121-14-2 —— 84-66-2 ——— • 7005-72-3 — 86-73-7 ——— 100-01-6 —— 534-52-1 —— 86-30-6 ——— 101-55-3 —— 118-74-1 —— 87-86-5 ——— ——— 3-Nitroaniline ———— Acenaphthene ———— 2 . 4-Dinitrophenol ———— 4 -Nitrophenol ——— Dibehzofuran ———— 2 . 4-Dinitrotoluene ———— Diethylphthalate ——— 4-Chl oropheny 1 -pheny le ther __ ——— 4 -Nitroanil ine ——— 4, 6-Dinitro-2-Methylph«nol __ ——— W-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) __ • ——— 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether ___ • ——— Hexachlorobenzene • ——— Pentachloroohenol 85-0 1-8- —————— Phenan threne 120-12-7 —— 84-74-2 ——— 206-44-0 —— 129-00-0 —— 85-68-7 —— - 91-94-1 —— - 218-01-9 — - 117-81-7 — - 117-84-0 — • 205-99-2—— 207-08-9 — • 50-32-8 —— • 193-39-5 — • 53-70-3 —— • 191-24-2 — • — - —— Di-n-Butylphthalate • ———— Fluoranthene • ——— Pyrene • ——— Benzo (a) Anthracene • ——— Chrysene ———— bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate • ——— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate ———— Benzofb) Fluoranthene ———— Indeno ( 1 . 2 . 3-cd) Pyrene ———— Dibenzof a. h) Anthracene ———— Benzo(g.h.i)Perylene 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev. SBMPLE DBTP P8CKB6E TUT 001 O5O9 1C SEMIVOIATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: ___ BX994 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 266725 Lab File ID: GJ066725A22 Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Extracted: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/18/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline_________ 83-32 -9 ——————Acenaphthene___________ 51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______ 100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol____________ 132-64-9—•————Dibenzofuran___________ 121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______ 84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73-7-—————Fluorene_________________________ 100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________ 534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol 86-30-6——————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 101-55-3——————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_______ 87-86-5——————Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8——————Phenanthrene___________ 120-12-7——————Anthracene_____________ 84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate______ 206-44-0——————Fluoranthene___________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene________________ 85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1——————3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine______ 56-55-3———•——Benzo (a) Anthracene_____________ 218-01-9-————Chrysene______________ 117-81-7—————bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate_ 117-84-0—————Di-n-octyl Phthalate____ 205-99-2——————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene_____ 207-08-9——————Benzo (k) Fluoranthene_____ 50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________ 193-39-5——————Indeno( 1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___ 53-70-3——————Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene___ 191-24-2—————Benzo (g,h,i)Perylene____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev. SAMPLE 0/977? ^ TUT 001 0510 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) S,EpF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Ii_ pH: ___ BX995RE Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SIX! No.: BX260 CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 266726______ Lab File ID: GRJ66726C16 Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Extracted: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/16/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 99-09-2————-~ 3-Nitroaniline__________ 83-32-9———————Acenaphthene_______________ 51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______ 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol__________ 132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran___________ 121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______ 84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate________ 7005-72-3————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73-7———————Fluorene___________________ 100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________ 534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol 86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 101-55-3—————4-Bronophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_______ 87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8——————Phenanthrene__________ 120-12-7—————Anthracene____________ 84-74-2———————Di-n-Butylphthalate______ 206-44-0——————Fluoranthene_____________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1——————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3———————Benzo (a) Anthracene______ 218-01-9-—————Chrysene_____________________ 117-81-7—————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____ 205-99-2——————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene 207-08-9—————Benzo(k)Fluoranthene____ 50-32-8———————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________ 193-39-5——————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___ 53-70-3——————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene___ 191-24-2——————Benzofcr.h.ilPervlene (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 u uuu v-R uuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu -•'FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev. SBMPLE :Sara PBCKQGE .-•-::_* ^v '~^ IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) M_ pH: ___ BX996 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SD6 No.: BX26Q^ Lab .Sample ID: 266781____ Lab File ID: GJ066781A06 Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Extracted: 06/13/89 Date Analyzed: 06/13/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 108-95-2——————Phenol__________________ 111-44-4——————bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether____ 95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol___________ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene________ 106-46-7—————1,4-Dichlorobenzene_______ 100-51-6——————Benzyl Alcohol___________ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene______ 95-48-7——————2-Methylphenol___________ 39638-32-9————bi»(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether_ 106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol____________ 621-64-7——————N-Nitro«o-Di-n-Propylamine__ 67-72-1——————Hexachloroethane_________ 98-95-3——————Nitrobenzene____________ 78-59-1—•————Isophorone______________ 88-75-5——————2-Nitrophenol____________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol________ 65-85-0———————Benzoic Acid_____________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__ 120-8 3-2 ——————2,4-Dichlorophenol________ 120-82-1————-1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____ 91-20-3——————Naphthalene_____________ 106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline__________ 87-68-3———•——Hexachlorobutadiene_______ 59-50-7——————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol____ 91-57-6——————2-Methylnaphthalene_______ 77-47-4——————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene___ 88-06-2——————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95-4——————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______ 91-58-7——————2-Chloronaphthalene_______ 88-74-4——————2 -Ni troanil ine___________ 131-11-3——————Dimethyl Phthalate________ 208-96-8—————Acenaphthylene___________ 606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene________ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 FORM I SV-1 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu u-uuuuuuuuuuuu e-uuu 1/87 Rev. T iS.-: •; :-^W'-.-'T ••:•-- lui . , 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE ?r BX979 Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ 'Contract: 68-D9-OQ32 Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX26Q Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP Lab Sample ID: 266721_____ Lab File ID: CNQ66721A19 Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Analyzed: 06/13/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3—-—————Chloromethane____________ 74-83 -9—-————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroe thane_____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride________ 67-64-1——————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane_________ 540-59-0——————i,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone___________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————carbon Tetrachloride_____ 108-05-4——.———Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4-—-——•—Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———•———Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———-———Benzene______________ 10061-02-6-———Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——--——Bromoform_________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pent anone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_______________ 127-18-4-————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5——————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3—————Toluene______________ 108-90-7———•——Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene____________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Uu U" uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuauuuu lf\ If, FORM I VQA 1/87 Rev SPMPLE DPTP IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) E_ pH: BX979 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266721____ Lab File ID: GH066721BQ6 Date Received: Q6/1Q/89 Date Extracted: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/12/89 Dilution Factor: l.Q____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L FORM I SV-1 108-95-2 ———— 111-44-4 ———— 541-73-1 ———— 106-46-7 ———— 100-51-6 ———— 95-50-1 ————— 95-48-7 ————— 106-44-5 ———— 621-64-7 ———— 67-72-1 ————— 98-95-3 ————— 88-75-5 ————— 105-67-9 ———— 65-85-0 ————— 111-91-1 ———— 120-83-2 ———— 120-82-1 ———— 91-20-3 ————— 106-47-8 ———— 87-68-3 ———— 91-57-6 ———— 77-47-4 ————— 88-06-2 ————— 95-95-4 ———— - 88-74-4 ———— - 131-11-3 ——— - 606-20-2 ——— - —— -Phenol —— bis ( 2 -Chloroethy 1 ) Ether —— 2 -Chlorophenol —— 1.3 -Dichl orobenzene —— 1 . 4-Dichlorobenzene —— Benzyl Alcohol — — 1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene —— 2 -Methy Iphenol —— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether —— 4 -Methy Iphenol —— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __ —— Hexachl or oethane —— Nitrobenzene —— Isophorone —— 2 -Nitrophenol —— 2,4-Dimethvlphenol —— Benzoic Acid —— bis ( 2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __ —— 2 . 4-Dichlorophenol —— 1 . 2 f 4-Trichlorobenzene • —— Naphthalene . . • —— 4-Chloroaniline „ • —— Hexachlorobutadiene , _ , , , „ • —— 4 -Chloro-3 -Methy Iphenol . . , • —— 2-Methylnaphthalene • —— 2 . 4 , 6-Trichlorophenol • —— 2 . 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol • —— 2-Chloronaphthalene . , . - —— 2-Nitroaniline - —— Dimethyl Phthalate • —— Acenaphthylene • —— 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu u • uuuuuuuuuuuu u-v uuu .1/87 Rev. TUT 001 05.14 1C SEMI VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS ________ Lab Code: COMPU case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/rol: 1000 (g/fflL) ML Level: (lov/ned) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup : (Y/H) H _ pH: BX979 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266721____ Lab File ID: GH066721B06 Date Received: 06/10/89 . Date Extracted: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/12/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV-2 99-09-2 ——————— 3-Nitroaniline 8 3 -32-9 — • —— • ——— Acenaphthene 51-28-5 ——————— 2 . 4-Dinitrophenol 10O-02-7 —————— 4-Nitrophenol 132-6 4 -9—— — ——Dibenzo furan 121-14-2 —————— 2 . 4-Dinitrotoluene 84-66-2 ——————— Diethylphthalata 70O5-72-3 ————— 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether __ 86-73-7 ——————— Fluorene 100-01-6 —————— 4-Nitroaniline 534-52-1 ————— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol __ 86-30-6 ——————— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) __ 101-55-3 —————— 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether ___ 118-74-1 ————— — Hexachlorobenzene 87 -86-5- —— - ——— Pentachlorophenol 120-12-7 ———— - — Anthracene «4-74-2 ——————— Di-n-Butylphthalate 206-44-0 —————— Fluoranthene 129-00-0 —————— Pyrene . , . 85-68-7 ——————— Butylbenzylphthalate 91-94-1 ——————— 3 , 3 '-Dichlorobenzidine 218-01-9 —————— Chrysene . 117-81-7 ————— bis ( 2 -Ethylhexyl) Phthalate __ 117-84-0 —————— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 205-99-2 —————— Benzo (b) Fluoranthene 2OT-O8-9 —————— Benzo (Jc) Fluoranthene 50-32-8 ——————— Benzo (a) Pyrene 193-39-5 —————— Indeno ( 1 f 2 , 3-cd) Pyrene . , 53-70-3 ——————— Dibenzo (a fh) Anthracene . „ „ „ 191-24-2 —————— Benzo(gfhri)Perylene 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Uuuuuuuuu U ' • uuuuuuuuuu vttf uuuuuuuuuu 1/87 Rev. SBHPLE Dara PBCKPBE '; TUT 001 0515 /!_/ .4., .^fcL,- 1A >--t«- VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS'DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP BX981 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS NO.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 266720_____ Lab File ID: CMQ66720A19 Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Analyzed: Q6/13/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L C 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane____________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64*1——————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform___________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4—————vinyl Acetate_________ 75-27-4-—•—•———Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5—•——cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene _______ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43 -2 —————-Benzene______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2—————-Bronoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4———•—-Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3———•—-Toluene__________________ 108-90-7-————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethvlbenzene __________ 100-42-5—————Styrene___________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 10 4 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 ktw u JJuuuuuuuuauuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuua FORM I VOA 1/87 Re SAMPLE PPCKB TUT 001 0516 - *-*-»-••».-~- •••••*—•-«:. -• - • •tS^-j-^;.:",: ;r^^^i^^^?^.^ : -j;-:_,rtS-«^ --"?-J-*iv-J _ -- -«^'.'--? "-; :f:^^fe^^\ 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE N. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case Mo.: 12058 SAS No.: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 fg/nL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pacJc/cap) CAP 'Contract: 68-D9-0032 BX990 SDG Ho.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266497____ Lab File ID: CN066497A1Q Date Received: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/11/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0___ CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (Ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 74-87-3——————Chlorone thane__________ 74-83-9—————— Bromonethane________• 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3—————•—Chloroform____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3—————- 2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________ 75-27-4——————Broaodichlorome thane____ 78-87-5——————•!, 2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————ci«-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———-——Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1————— Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene______________ 10061-02-6————Tran«-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2—————Bromoform____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6—————2-Hexanone___________ 127-18-4-—•———Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-3 4 -5——————1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5—————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Uu Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuau FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev SBMPLE OPT ft POCKP6E TUT 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE : Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________ Lab Code: COMPU case No.: 12O58 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: S.Q (g/mL) ML Level: (low/Bed) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP BX991 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266498______ Lab File ID: . C4R66496C10 Date Received: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/12/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (uq/L or ug/Kg) UC/L Qr 74-87-3———————Chloronethane____________ 74 -83 -9 ——-———Bronone thane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1———————Acetone___________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3—•——-——Chloroform____________ 107-06-2——————1,2 -Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4------——-BroModichloronethane____ 78 -97 -5—•————1, 2-Dichloropr opane______ 10061-01-5————ci«-l, 3-Dichloropropene___ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene_________ 12 4-48-1 —————DibroaochloroM thane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene______________ 10061-02-6———-TraiM-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bra-oform________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Bexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethan«_ 108-88-3—————Toluene______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4—————Bthylbenzene__________ 100-42-5—————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 32 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 tfJit; '/:; VitJ u eT FORM I VOA 1/87 Re SPMPLE PBCKPGE 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML . Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP BX993 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266499_______ Lab File ID: CN066499A10 Date Received: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/11/89 Dilution Factor: l.O_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———————Chloroform______________ 107-06-2 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone______________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4———————Bromodichlorotne thane____ 78-87-5———————1, 2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene_______ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2——————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bronofonn___________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Uy U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SBMPLE PPCKQBF TUT 001 0519 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________ Lab Code: COMPO Case No.: 12QS8 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/ned) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP BX994 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS NO.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266725______ Lab File ID: CR066725B19 Date Received: 06/10/89 Date Analyzed: 06/13/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0_______ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3 —————— -Chloronethane 75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride 75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethane 75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride 67-64-1 ——————— Acetone 75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4 ——————— 1.1-Dichloroethene 75-34-3 —————— ~1 . 1-Dichloroethane 540-59-0 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ 67-66-3— — •. ———— Chloroform 107-06-2 ——————— l-2-Dichloroethan« 78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanone 71-55-6 ——————— lflfl-Trichloroethane _ . 56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride 108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acetate 75-27-4 ——————— Broaodichloromethane . 78-87-5 ——————— 1 . 2-Dichloropropane 10061-01-5 ————— cis-1 . 3 -Dichloropropene 79-01-6 —————— Trichloroethene 124-48-1 —————— Dibromochloromethane . 79-00-5 ——————— 1.1.2-Trichloroethane 71-43-2 ——————— Benzene 10061-02-6 ———— Trans-l , 3 -Dichloropropene ___ 75-25-2 —————— Bromoform 108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanone 127-18-4 —————— Tetrachloroethene 79-34-5 —————— i ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ 108-88-3 —————— Toluene 108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene 100-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene 100-42-5 —————— Styrene 1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenes 10 x--»v 10 v J, 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 110 «-W5" uu-w-^r u U U U U U Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SffMPLE DPTP PPCKPB '»._._,-i?l£i-. :*••<•'•. ~k&.3£' ~"-.rr*,"••"-• " '*• TUT 001 0520 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NC Lab Name: COMPCCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU case No.: 12058 SAS No.: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (lov/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP Contract: 68-D9-0032 BX996 SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266781 ____ File ID: CNQ66781B19 Date Received: Q6/10/89 Date Analyzed: Q6/13/89 Dilution Factor: l.Q CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L 74-87-3———•———Chloromethane__________ 74-83 -9 —•—--—Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3-———•—-Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1——————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3-——--——Chloroform______________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3 ——————2-Butanone___________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________ 75-27-4-——•——-Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5————~ 1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5———cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1————— Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-4 3-2——————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————Tran»-l, 3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Broaofom____________________ 108-10-1—————t-Methyl-2-Pentanone______ 591-78 -6——————2-Hexanone___________• 127-18-4——--—-Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7—————-Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5—————Styrene_____________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 auuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev SAMPLE oata ~> .•'^i?''-'^•*-•"•• -"-" "•" :j---'^r:'V-,r:«j«g^*£.-'- "T -.- .-Ai./.-iV;--.~".i:--vif.-.-s.-TE:?:-.« '"-;.-•.. " 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______ Contract: 68-D9-0032 EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab coda: COMPU case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: i.Q (g/«L) Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 15 Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY702 SAS No. SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: 2^7_L_5______ Lab File ID: G3R6719SA19 Date Received: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/21/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CAS HO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) TTG/KG 74-87-3 —•——••—Chloromethane____________ 74-83-9——————Bromoaethane__________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3 ——————Chloroethane__________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1——————Acetone__________• 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene__________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane_________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform_____________________ 107-06-2——————l,2-Di«hloroethane_______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane___ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________ 75-27-4————•—Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5——————•!, 2-Dichloropropane_____ 10O61-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2——————Benzene________;______ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromofon_>_____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6—————2-Hexanone_____________• 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3 —————Toluene______________________ 108-90-7—•————Chlorobenzene______________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5—————Styrene_______________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes____________ 59 59 59 59 190 89 29 29 29 29 7 29 59 29 29 59 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 59 59 29 29 29 29 29 29 270 FORM I VOA uuuu At uuuuJuuuuuuuuuuu 0uuuuuuuuuu 1/87 Rev. :— - SBMPLE Of)T0 PBCKOBi TUT OO1 052 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) $ Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. 11 Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY703 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX2S8 Lab Sample ID: 267196______ Lab File ID: CR067196B23 Date Received: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/19/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0______ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane_________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane_______________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane__________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). €7-66-3——————Chloroform____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56 -2 3 -5——————Carbon Tetrachl oride____ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate_________ 75-27-4———————Bromod ichl orome thane________ 78-87-5———————l, 2-Dichloropropane_____ 1OO61-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dlbromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———-———Benzene_______________ 1O061-02-6——-—Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoforra______________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6—————2-Hexanone__________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachl or oethene_______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene_________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ LOO-42-5——————Stvrene ____________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes________ 1400 1400 1400 1400 280 1400 700 700 700 700 700 700 1400 700 700 1400 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 1400 1400 700 700 700 700 3300 700 5100 Uu UuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu u FORM I VOA 37 Sf9liPLE 1/87 Rev. . -- - - -..-••^r-ST'Sr, PQCKO6E TUT 001 0523 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS______________ Lab Code: COMPU Case Ho.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) _ Level: (low/Bed) MED % Moisture: not dec. 18 Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY704 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX2S8 Lab Sanple ID: 267197____ Lab File ID: CR067197B23 Date Received: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/19/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 7 4 -87-3 ———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromome thane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3-—————Chloroethane__________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1——————Acetone______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———————Chloroform_______________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6—————Tr ichlor oethene_________ 124-48-1—-———Dibromochloromethane______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane_____ 71-43-2 ——-———Benzene_______________________ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform__________________ 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_________________ 127-18-4 ——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene_____________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5—————Styrene_____________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_________ 1500 1500 1500 1500 460 1500 760 760 760 760 760 760 1500 760 760 1500 760 760 760 760 760 760 760 760 760 1500 1500 760 760 780 760 2500 760 8500 U U U U J U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VGA 1/87 Rev. ...-*-!= *-r •-"!» SPMPLE DQTP PaCKPBE TUT 001 0524 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case Mo.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/nL) J Level: (lov/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. _21 column: (pack/cap) CAP BY705 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: 267198_____ Lab File ID: C2R67198C23 Date Received: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/20/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ i GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane____________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane_____________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3—•————Chloroethane_______________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride________ 67-64-1——————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide__________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene__________ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane__________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3———————Chloroforn_____________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_________ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone________________ 71-55-6———————1,1, l-Trichloroe thane______ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_______ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________ 75-27-4——•———Bronodichloronethane_______ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane________ 10061-01-5——-—cis-l,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene___________ 124-48-1—————-Dlbronochlorone thane_______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43-2———————Benz ene_________________ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene___ 75-25-2——————Bronoforn_______________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone________ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone________________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___ 108-88-3——————Toluene____________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene____________ 100-41-4 ——————Ethylbenzene_____________ 100-42-5—————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes____________ 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 820 820 820 820 820 820 1600 820 820 1600 820 820 820 820 820 820 820 820 820 1600 1600 820 820 820 820 240 820 3600 uuuu 9ff Uuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SPHPLE oara POCKOBE TUT 001 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS Contract: 68-D9-0032 BY707 Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 SAS No. SOG No.: BX258 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.D (g/mL) Level: (low/ved) MED % Moisture: not dec. Column: (pack/cap) CAP CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 267199 ___ Lab File ID: C2R67199C23 Date Received: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/21/89 Dilution Factor: i.Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) SZSZE£,.<»v FORM I VOA 7 4 -87-3 ——————— Chloroanthane 74-83-9 ——————— Bromome thane 75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride 75_00-3— — • — • —— Chloroe thane 75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride 67-64-1 — —————— Acetone 75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Disulfide 75-35-4 ——————— 1T 1-Dichloroethene 75-34-3 ——————— lf 1-Dichloroethane 54 0-59-0 —————— 1 ,2-Dichloroethene ( total ) __ 67-66-3 ——————— Chloroform 107-06-2 —————— -1 . 2-Dichloroethane 78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanone 71-55-6 ——————— 1,1,1-Trichloroethane . 56-23-5 —————— —Carbon Tetrachloride 108-05-4 — - — —— Vinyl Acetate 75-27-4 ——————— Bromodichloromethane 78-87-5 ———— ' —— 1 . 2-Dichloropropane 10061-01-5 ———— cis-1 . 3-Dj.chloropropene 79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene 79-00-5 ——————— 1.1.2-Trichloroethane 71-43-2 ——————— Benzene 10061-02-6—— —— Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene ___ 108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 108-88-3 —————— Toluene . . 100-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene 100-42-5 —————— Styrene 1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenes 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 790 790 790 790 790 790 1600 790 790 1600 790 790 790 790 790 790 790 790 790 1600 1600 790 790 550 790 750 790 13000 U Uuu uuuu0u u '•• uuuu u / uuuuuu ~ u •- uu U "' Ju .' J - ; u ,,. r - • Rev. SAMPLE iwTa^PBCKaee Jm" °01 °526 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: CQMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.Q (g/nL) Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. 16 Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY709 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX2SB Lab Sample ID: 2672Q1 Lab File ID: Date Received: Date Analyzed: C2R672Q1C23 06/14/89 06/21/89 Dilution Factor: l.O CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane____________ 74-83-9—•—————Bromonethane__________________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride________ 67-64-1 ——————-Acetone_________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3——————Chloroform_________________ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane________ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone______________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride______ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-27-4—————-Bromodichlorooethane______ 78-87-5———•——•1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene________ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________________ 124-48-1—————Dlbromochloromethane_____• 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43-2———-——Benzene_________________ 10061-02-6-———Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_____ 75-25-2——————Bromoform__________________ 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone__________ 591-78-6-—————2-Hexanone___________________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene___________ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___ 108-88-3——————Toluene___________________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene_______________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene___________________ 100-42-5—————Styrene________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_________• 1500 1500 1500 1500 4-W 1500 740 740 740 740 740 740 1500 740 740 1500 740 740 740 740 740 740 740 740 740 1500 1500 740 740 740 740 360 740 15000 Ufa* uuuu u • uuuuuuv u u • U ' u . uu J"i u -j FORM I VOA _rv_s-••:- -..; --' •': JT*> ' .- - •- * 1/87 Rev. SPMPLE DffTff ppCKaee TLIT °01 052? 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM IABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case Mo.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.C Level: (lov/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. 16 Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY711 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 (g/mL) Lab Sample ID: 267202____ Lab File ID: CR0672Q3C23 Date Received: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/21/89 Dilution Factor: l.O___ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG 74-87-3————•——Chloromethane____________ 74-83-9-———•——Bromomethane_____________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane_____________________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride________ 67-64-1———————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide__________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0——-———1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3——————Chloroform______________ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane_______ 73-93-3—————:—2-Butanone________________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride______ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-27-4—-—-——Bromodichloromethane______ 78-87-5——•———1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79 -01-6——————Tr ichloroethene__________ 124-48-1——•———Dlbromochloromethane_______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane_________ 71-43 -2 ——————Benzene__________________ 10061-02-6————Tran»-l, 3-Dichloropropene___ 75-25-2——————Bromoform_____________________ 108-10-1——————4 -Methyl -2 -Pentanone_______ 591-78-6—————2-Hexanone________________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___ 108-88-3——————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene____________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene_____________ 100-4 2 -5—————S tyrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________________ 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 740 740 740 740 740 740 1500 740 740 1500 740 740 740 740 740 740 740 740 740 1500 1500 740 740 740 740 740 740 2100 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu \J •At* i, - »'" FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. •-*-. S8MPLE DPTB PBCKOBE TUT 001 0528 __._ . . - - 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM Lab Code: CQMPU case Mo.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) J Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. Contract: 68-D9-0032 BY712 SAS No.: SDG No.: BX258 Column: (pack/cap) CAP CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 267203____ Lab File ID: CR067203A23 Date Received: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/21/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3—•—————Chloromethane__________ 74-83 -9——————Bromomethane__________ 75-01-4——————vinyl Chloride________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_____________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide__________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———————Chloroform_________________ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_______ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate_______________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____ 7 8-87-5———————1,2 -Dichloropropane________ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6————•——Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1-——•—— Dibromochloromethane_______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2 —«————Benzene_____________________ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2——————Bromoform____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2 -Hexanone_________________ 12 7-18 -4—————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene___________• 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene_________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5—————styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes___________ 1400 1400 1400 1400 710 2**- 1400 720 720 720 720 720 720 1400 720 720 1400 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 1400 1400 720 720 720 720 720 720 4800 Uu Uu «*•£(. uuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. DPTP PPCKfiee TUT 001 0529 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______ Contract: 68-D9-Q032 EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPP case Mo.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. BY713 SAS No.: SDG No.: BX258 Column: (pack/cap) CAP CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 267204_____ Lab File ID: CR067204A23 Date Received: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/21/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0___ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 ——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83 -9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3—•————-Chloroethane__________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide__________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3—~———Chloroform__________________ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————-2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane___ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4—————vinyl Acetate________________ 75-27-4 —•—•——-Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5-—•——cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1-—•———Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————i, i, 2-Trichloroethane_____ 71-43-2--—————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————BroBOform_________________ 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——•————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7———-Chlorobenzene_________________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene____________ 100-42-5—————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 1500 1500 1500 1500 -»ee- 1500 740 740 740 740 740 740 1500 740 740 1500 740 740 740 740 740 740 740 740 740 1500 1500 740 740 740 740 740 740 1300 FORM I VGA 1/87 Rev. TLIT 001 0530 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Name: COMPUCHEM Lab Coda: COMPtl Casa Mo.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/watar) WATER Sampla wt/vol: §.o (g/mL) Leval: (low/mad) LOW % Moistura: not dac. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP Contract: 68-D9-0032r'r BY701 SAS No. SOG No.: BX260 Lab Sanpla ID: 267194 Fila ID: CM067194B12 Data Racaivad: 06/14/89 Data Analyzed: O6/14/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) 74-87-3 ——————— ChloroBathana 74-83-9 ——————— BroBomathana 75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chlarida 75-00-3——— —— -- Cnloroathana 75-09-2 ——————— Mathylana Chloride 67-64-1 —————— Acatona 75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Diaul*id« 75-35-4 ——————— lrl-Dichloro_th«n« 75-34-3 ——————— 1,1-DlchloMMtaan* 540-59-0 —————— l,2-Dichloro«thaJM (total) 67-66-3 ——————— Cfeloroforn 107-06-2 ——————— 1 1 2-Dichloro-thana . .,_ . 78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanona 71-55-6 ——————— 1. 1. 1-Trichloroathana 56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tatrachlorida _ 108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acatata 75-27-4 ——————— BrOBOdichloromathana 78-87-5 ——————— 1 . 2-Dichloropropana 10061-01-5 ————— cia-lf 3-Dichloroprop«na ._ _ 79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroathana . 124-48-1 —————— Dibronochloromathana 79-00-5 ——————— 1,1,.2-Trichloroathan* ,. ... 71-43-2 ——————— B*nz«na 10061-02-6 ———— Tran«-l,3-Dichloroprop«n«_ ___ 75-25-2 ——————— BrOBOfon 108-10-1 —————— 4-Mathvl-2-Pentanona 127-18-4 —————— Tatraehloroathana 79-34-5 —————— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tatrachloroathana_ __ 108-88-3 ——————— Toluana 108-90-7^ —————— Chlorobanzana 100-41-4 —————— Ethylbanzana 100-42-5 —————— Styrana 1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylanas 10 10 10 10 S 8 5 5 5 S ' 5 5 . 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 . 5 5 10 10 S - :..s , 55 S 5 - .',-5 • U U U U U^ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rav >? • . '.- /:•*-. .- DQTP P/9CKA TUT 001 O531 /, 4 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. BY701 Lab Name: coMPOCHEM LABS________ Contract: 68-D9-0032 Lab Coda: COMPU Case Mo.: 12058 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: looo (g/mL) ML_ Level: (lov/aed) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/H) u_ pH: ___ Lab Sample ID: 267194_____ Lab File ID: ffHO67194A15 Date Received: 06/14/89 Date Extracted: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/15/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0 GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L 108-95-2—————Phenol____________________ 111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether____ 95-57-8———!--—2-Chlorophenol___________ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_______ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene________ 10O-51-6—————Benzyl Alcohol______________ 95-50-1——-———1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-48-7——————2-Methylphenol___________ 39638-32-9-———-bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether_ 106-4 4 -5——————4-Methy Iphenol___________ 621-64-7—————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine__ 67-72-1——————Hexachloroethane__________ 98-95-3——————Nitrobenzene___________ 78-59-1——————Isophorone______________ 88-7 5-5——————2 -Nitrophenol____________ 105-67-9——————2,4 -Dimethy Iphenol________ 65-85-0———————Benzoic Acid________________ 111-91-1——r——bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane_ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol________ 120-82-1—————1,2,4-Tri'chlorobenzene____ 91-20-3——————Naphthalene____________ 106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline___________ 87-6 8-3 ——————Hexachlorobutad iene_________ 59-50-7——————4-Chloro-3-Methyl phenol___ 91-57-6———————2-Methvlnaohthalene 77-4 7-4 —————Hexachlorocyclopentad iene__ 88-06-2——————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______ 95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol_____ 91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene_______ 88-74-4———————2-Nitroaniline____________ 131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate_______ 208-96-8———•—-Acenaph thy Iene____________ 606-20-2—————2,6-Dinitrotoluene_______ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 so 10 50 10 10 10 u uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev. ^ ' SBMPLE DQTR PQCKQB£ TUT 001 0532 J*v-.-- -I-ii:.f IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. BY758 Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Contract: 68-D9-0032 Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 120SB SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Saaple wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (lov/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: ___ CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 26650Q Lab Pile ID: CHQ66SQQAQ4 Date Received: 06/09/89 Date Extracted: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: Q6/H/89 Dilution Factor: i.Q___ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L 108-95-2 ——— • 111-44-4 ——— - 95-57-8 ———— - 541-73-1 ——— - 106-46-7 ——— • 100-51-6 ——— • 95-50-1 ———— - 95-48-7 ———— • 39638-32-9 — • 106-44-5 ——— • 621-64-7 ——— • 67-72-1 ———— • 98-95-3 ----- 78-59-1 —— ~ 88-75-5 ———— • 105-67-9 —— - 65-85-0 ----- 111-91-1 — — 120-83-2 —— - 120-82-1 —— - 91-20-3 ———— 106-47-8 ——— 87-68-3 ----- 59-50-7 ———— 91-57-6 ———— 77-47-4 ———— 88-06-2 ———— 95-95-4 ----- 91-58-7 ———— 88-74-4 ———— 131-11-3 ——— 208-96-8 -—— 606-20-2 ——— —— Phenol . —— bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether „ —— Benzyl Alcohol —— 1.2-Dichlorobenzene ,,., .. ., —— 2-Methylphenol ——— 4-Methylphenol —— Nitrobenzene —— 2 f 4-Dimethylphenol —— bis ( 2-Chloroethoxy ) Methane __ ——— Ir2.4-Trichlorobenzene ,. ——— 4-Chloroaniline ——— Hexachlorobutadiene ——— 2-Methylnaphthalene —— Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ___ — • — 2 r 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol . ,..,., ——— 2-Nitroaniline ——— Dimethyl Phthalate ——— Acenaphthylene „ ——— 2 r 6-Dinitrotoluene . 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 "10 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 uuuuuuuu..— /? uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuau U ' u • auauu FORM I SV-1 DPT ft PPCKBGE IJT OO1 0533 1A -"/_-(,'~^v'> VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: CQMPtl case No.: 12058 SAS No.: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not d»c. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP Contract: 68-D9-0032 BY758 SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266500 Lab File ID: Date Received: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/11/89 Dilution Factor: 1..0 ____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L 74-87-3——————Chlorome thane____________ 74-83-9--—————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4—————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroe thane____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide____________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane_________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4———•———Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene_____• 124-48-1——————Dibromochlorome thane____ 79-00-5——————l, 1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43 -2——————Benzene_________________ 10061-02-6—————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2—————Bromoform____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——-----2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——•——Chlorobenzene_________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene____;_________ 100-42-5—————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5" 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 2 5 5 5 U0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ U U U FORM I VOX 1/87 Rev. SOMPLE Jiafc.-. -.?*w~<-^- TUT 001 °534 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. BY758 Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Contract: 68-D9-0032 Lab Code: CQMPO Case No.: 12058 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: IQQQ (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) H_ pH: ____ Lab Sample ID: 266500____ Lab File ID: GHQ665OOA04 Date Received: 06/09/89 Date Extracted: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/11/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline____________ 83-32 -9 ——————Acenaphthene___________ 51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol________ 100-02-7—————4-Hitrophenol__________ 132-64-9--——«—Dibenzofuran___________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______ 84-66-2———————Diethylphthalate________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 86-73-7——————Fluorene_______________ 100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline__________ 534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol_ 86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 101-55-3—————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ 118 -7 4 -1—————Hexachlorobenzene_______ 87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8——————Phenanthrene____________ 120-12-7——————Anthracene_______ 84-74-2———————Di-n-Butylphthalate______ 206-44-0—————Fluoranthene____________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1——————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3——————Benzo (a) Anthracene______ 218-01-9—————Chrysene_______________ 117-81-7——————bis (2-Ethylhexyl )Phthalate 117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____ 2 05 -9 9 -2 —————Benz o (b) Fluoranthene______ 207-08-9—————Benzo (k) Fluoranthene____ 50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________ 193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___ 53-70-3——————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene_____ 191-24-2——————Benzo (g,h, i) Perylene_____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuu ftftf-7 uuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-2 •.- SBHPL£ DPTQ PBCKQBE ,y, •-•• •-^-A-jM^~.^^^-^-;-^^^*^^^^ii°^TO3^^^:. ---^.: - _. ^J^S^^^^fe^^^^^^-i—^v- ^^^^^^^5^^:r^--«^- 1/87 Rev. 001 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/nL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) M_ pH: ___ BY761 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 267127____ Lab File ID: GH067127B16 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Extracted; 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/15/89 Dilution Factor: i.o___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 111-44-4 —— — 95-57-8 ———— - 541-73-1 ——— - 106-46-7 ———— 100-51-6 ——— - 95-50-1 ———— - ^QJCIfi 1^ Q 106-44-5 ——— - 621-64-7 ——— - 67-72-1 ———— • 98-95-3 ———— • 78-59-1 ———— • 88-75-5 ———— • 105-67-9 ——— • 65-85-0 ———— • 111-91-1 ——— • 120-83-2 ——— • 120-82-1 ——— • 91-20-3 ———— 106-47-8 ——— 87-68-3 ———— 59-50-7 ———— 91-57-6 ———— 77-47-4 ———— 88-06-2 ———— 95-95-4 ———— 91-58-7 ———— 88-74-4 ———— 131-11-3 ——— 208-96-8 ——— 606-20-2 ——— • —— Phenol • —— 2-Chlorophenol • —— 1. 3-Dichlorobenzene • —— 1 f 4-Dichlorobenzene • —— Benzyl Alcohol • —— 1.2-Dichlorobenzene - —— 2-Methylphenol - —— 4-Methylphenol — — N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __ —— Hexachloroethane —— Nitrobenzene —— 2-NitroDhenol - —— 2 . 4-Dimethylphenol —— 2 f 4-Dichlorophenol - —— 1.2 f 4-Trichlorobenzene —— Naphthalene —— 4-Chloroaniline ——— Hexachlorobutadiene ——— 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol —— 2-Methylnaphthalene —— Hexachlorocy cl opentadi ene ___ ——— 2 . 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol ——— 2-Chloronaphthalene ——— 2 -Nitroanil ine 10 10 10 10 10 17 10 27 10 41 10 10 10 10 10 31 50 10 10 10 __tf /x/jTi ^«<% 10 10 10 \/ —S^t\ 4MfrA_ •Jp**" rf ^ \j y^f^j- 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 Uuuuu u u uuuuu «*•// ^y ~o i^ uuu -Bb uuuJb uuuuuuuu Rev. ?£:j^: SRHPLe DOT* PPCKQ6E . TUT 001 0536 *&&%m.:^;- --L-- ---^^^^^^.^^^sm^^^^ 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. BY761 Lab Name: CQMPUCHEM LABS_________ Contract: 68-D9-0032 Lab Code: COMPP case No.: 12058 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1QQQ (g/mL) ML_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPP GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: ____ Lab Sample ID: 267127_____ Lab File ID: GH067127B16 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Extracted: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/15/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline__________ 83-32-9—•—————Acenaphthene____________ 51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______ 100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol__________ 132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran___________ 121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______ 84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 86-7 3 -7 -——————Fluorene__________________ 100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________ 534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol 86-30-6———•——N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 101-55-3—————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1—•————Hexachlorobenzene_______ 87-86-5-—————Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8-————Phenanthrene______________ 120-12-7—————Anthracene____________ 84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate_____ 206-44-0———•——Fluoranthene____________ 129-00-0—————Pyrene_______________ 85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1———————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3-—————Benzo (a) Anthracene________ 218-01-9——————Chrysene______________ 117-81-7——————bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____ 205-99-2——————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene______ 207-08-9——————Benzo(k)Fluoranthene_____ 50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________ 193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___ 53-70-3—————Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene_____ 191-24-2—————Benzo (g,h, i) Perylene______ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 21 50 50 10 10 10 17 13 3 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 80 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 u uuuuuJ JuuuuuuuT uuuuuaa FORM I SV-2 ^PRCKtiBE '• ••£• -i'-_ ' _-- • - •-. TUT ,..1/87 Rev. 0537 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. BY762 lab Name: COMPPCHEM LABS_______ contract: 68-09-0032 Lab Coda: COMTO casa No.: 12058 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/mad) LOW % Moisture: not dac. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP Lab Sample ID: 266501____ Lab File ID: CNQ66501B10 Data Received: 06/09/89 Data Analyzed: 06/11/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3 —— —— -— Chlorome thane 74-83 -9— ————— Bromome thane 75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride 75-00-3 — — —— — Chloroathane 75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride 67-64-1 ——————— Acetone 75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Diaulfide 75-35-4 ——————— 1. 1-Diehloroethene 75-34-3 ——————— lrl-Dichloroathane 540-59-0 ———— --1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ 67-66-3 — ~ —— —Chloroform 107-06-2 ——————— If2-Dichloroethane ... _ 78-9 3-3 —————— -i-Butanone 71-55-6 ——————— lfafl-Trichloroethane . 56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachlorida 108-05-4 ————— Vinyl Acetate 75-27-4 ——————— Bromodichloromethane 78-87-5 ——————— -1,2-Dichloropropane 10061-01-5 ——— ~ci»-l , 3-Dichloropropane 79-01-6 ——————— Trlchloroethene 124-48-1 —— • —— —— Dibromochloromethana 79-00-5 ——————— 1,1,2-Trichloroethana 71-43-2 ——————— Benxena 10061-O2-6—— —— Trana-1 , 3-Dichloropropena ___ 75-25-2 ——————— Broaoform 108-10-1 —————— 4-Mathyl-2-Pentanona 591-78-6 —————— 2-Haxanona 79-34-5 —————— 1,1,2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ 108-88-3 —————— Toluene 108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzena 100-41-4 —————— Ethylbanzene 100-42-5 —————— Styrene 1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenea 10 10 ,*\ 10 > 10 ^ « 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Uu Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SAMPLE OOTO IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) M_ pH: ___ EPA SAMPLE NO. BY762 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266501_____ Lab File ID: GHQ66501X04 Date Received: 06/09/89 Date Extracted: o«/Q9/89 Date Analyzed: 06/11/89 Dilution Factor: _____ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 108-95-2 ———— 111-44-4 ———— 95-57-8 —— —— 541-73-1 ———— 106-46-7 ----- 100-51-6 ----- 95-50-1 —— —— 95-48-7 —— —— 106-44-5 ----- 621-64-7 —— ~ 67-72-1 ————— 78-59-1 —— —— 88-75-5 —— —— 105-67-9 —— — 65-85-0 —— —— 111-91-1 ----- 120-83-2 —— — 120-82-1 —— — 91-20-3 —— —— 106-47-8 —— — 87-68-3 —— —— 59-50-7 —— —— 91-57-6 ————— 77-47-4 ————— 88-06-2 ————— 91-58-7 —— —— 88-74-4 —— —— 131-11-3 —— — 208-96-8 —— — 606-20-2 ———— —— Phenol —— bis f 2-Chloroethyl) Ether —— 2 -Chl oropheno 1 —— 1. 3-Dichlorobenzene - — 1.4-Dichlorobenzene - — Benzyl Alcohol ——1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene —— 2 -Methylphenol —— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether —— 4 -Methylphenol —— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __ —— Hexachl or oethane — -Ni trobenz ene —— Isophorone —— 2-Nitrophenol ——2 . 4-Diaethylphenol —— Benzoic Acid —— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __ — -2 . 4-Dichlorophenol ——1 . 2 . 4-Trichlorobenzene —— Naphthalene —— Hexachlorobutadiene • —— 2-Methylnaphthalene , _ • —— Hexachlor ocyc 1 opentad iene • —— 2-Nitroaniline • —— Dimethyl Phthalate 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 uuuuuuuu »-/? *r K. uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu U' uuu FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev. SBMPLE OPTP SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________ Lab Code: COMPU case Mo.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/Bed) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) fl_ pH: ___ BY762 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 266501_____ Lab File ID: gno6650iA04 Date Received: Q6/Q9/89 Date Extracted: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/11/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0______ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline_________ 83-32-9——————Acenaphthene_____________ 51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______ 100-02^-7—————4-Nitrophenol__________ 132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran____________ 121-14 -»2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______ 84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate_______ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73-7——————Fluorene______________ 100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________ 534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol_ 86-30-6——————N-Nitrosodiphenylanine (1)_ 101-55-3—————4-Bronophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1————Hexachlorobenzene________ 87-86-5———-——Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8——————Phenanthrene___________ 120-12-7—————Anthracene____________ 84-7 4-2——————Di-n-Buty lphthalate________ 206-44-0—————-Fluoranthene__________ 129-00-0—————Pyrene_________________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1——————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3——————Benzo (a) Anthracene______ 218-01-9--————Chry sene_____________ 117-81-7—————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate. 117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____ 205-99-2——————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene_____ 207-08-9--————Benzo(k)Fluoranthene_____ 50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene________ 193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___ 53-70-3 ——————Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene_____ 191-24-2—————Benzo (g,h,i)Perylene____ 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 u (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev S(9HPLE DBTP -•" « *• ;-*r .,_". •%i^;:J»". ,_ ..- '.:_.. -_-.-.^.r..'^-.-^A,.-y*.- '^ • -S*^^'^;^"^^^^i^:^ '^•^^^•^-^•-^©^i^- :W^ oo i- 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET i si y-^-,y_/EPA SAMFJ Lab Name: CQMPncHEM LABS_______ Lab Cod*: COMPO Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 2.5 (g/mL) ML Level: (lov/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY763 Contract: 68-D9-Q032 SAS No.: _____ SD6 No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 267128____ Lab File ID: CR067128B12 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: l.O____ , CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UC/L Q 74-87-3 ——————— Chloromethane . , 74-83-9 ——————— Bromomethane 75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride 75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethane 75-09-2 ——————— Methvlene Chloride 67-64-1 ——————— Acetone 75-15-0 ———————— Carbon Diaulfide 75-35-4 ——————— lfl-Dichloroethene 75-34-3 ——————— 1 f 1-Dichloroethane 540-59-0 ————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ 67-66-3 ————— ——Chloroform 107-06-2 —————— 1 r 2-Dichloroethane 71-55-6 ——————— 1 r 1, 1-Trichloroethane 56-23-5—— ———— Carbon Tetrachlorida 108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acetate 78-87-5 ——————— 1.2-Dichloropropane 10061-01-5—— — -ci«-l , 3-Dichloropropene 79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene 79-00-5 ——————— lf lr 2-Trichloroethane 71-4 3-2 ——————— Benzene 108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone . 591-78-6—— — —— 2-Hexanone 127-18-4 —————— Tetrachloroethene ., , . 79-34-5 —————— 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 108-88-3 —————— Toluene 108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene 100-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene 100-42-5 —————— Styrene 1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenee 20 20 20 20 6 320 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuu BJ 8fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Re\ SBHPLE DPTP •TUT oo i o IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: COMPU case No.: 12068 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: ___ EPA SAMPLE NO: BY763 Contract: 68-D9-Q032 |_______ SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 267128_______ Lab File ID: GHQ67128B16 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Extracted: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/15/89 Dilution Factor: i.Q CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 108-95-2——————Phenol_________________ 111-44-4—————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether___ 95-57-8————— 2-Chlorophenol____;_____ 541-73-1—————1,3-Dichlorobenzene______ 106-46-7—————— 1,4-Dichlorobenzene____. 100-51-6—————Benzyl Alcohol_________ 95-50-1——————1,2-Dichlorobenzene______ 95-48-7——————2-Methyl phenol___________ 39638-32-9————bi«(2-Chloroi«opropyl)Ether_ 106-44-5—————4-Methylphenol___________ 621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine__ 67-72-1——————Rexachloroe thane________ 98-95-3——————Nitrobenzene___________ 78-59-1———•——Isophorone____________ 8 8-75-5———————2 -Nitrophenol___________ 105-67-9—————2,4-Dimethylphenol_______ 65-85-0——————Benzoic Acid___________ 111-91-1—————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol_______ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____ 91-20-3——————Naphthalene____________ 106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline_________ 87-68-3———•—Hexachlorobutadiene______ 59-50-7——————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol___ 91-57-6——————2-Methylnaphthalene______ 77-47-4——————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene_ 88-06-2——————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol_____ 95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol_____ 91-58-7-—•———-2-Chloronaphthalene______ 88-7 4-4——————2 -Ni troanil ine_________ 131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate_______ 208-96-8 —————Acenaphthy 1 ene_______________ 606-20-2—————2,6-Dinitrotoluene______ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 so 10 50 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu '.<? FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev. SPHPLE DftTB 05A2 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE ... Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________ Lab Code: COMPU case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/mad) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: ___ BY763 Contract: 68-D9-Q032 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 267128____ Lab File ID: GHQ67128B16 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Extracted: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/15/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline 83-32-9——————Acenaphthene 51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol___________ 100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol 132-64-9—•——•—Dibenzofuran 121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene 84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate____________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 86-73-7————-Fluorene 100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline 534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol 86-30-6——————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) 101-55-3—————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene 87-86-5——————Pentachlorophenol 85-01-8——————Phenanthrene 120-12-7—————Anthracene 84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate 206-44 -0——————Fluoranthene 129-00-0—————Pyrene 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate 91-94-1———————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine 56-55-3————•——Benzo( a) Anthracene 218-01-9—-——Chrysene 117-81-7—————bi»(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 117-84-0—————Di-n-octyl Phthalate 205-99-2—————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene 207-08-9—————Benzo (Je) Fluoranthene 50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene 193-39-5——————Indeno(l, 2,3-cd) Pyrene 53-70-3——————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene______ 191-24-2—————Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene________ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev. SRMPLE DBTP PQCKf96£ TUT 001 0543 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab tt : COMPUCHEM LABS Contract: 68-D9-Q032 SBLK08 Lab Code: COMPU case No.: 12058 SAS No.: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) M_ pH: ____ SDG No.: BX26Q Lab Sample ID: SBLKQ8____ Lab File ID: GH067362A1S Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: Q6/1S/B9 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 108-95-2 ————— 111-44-4 ————— 95-57-8 —————— 341-73-1 ————— 106-46-7 ————— 10O-51-6 ————— 95-50-1 —————— 95-48-7 —————— 39638-32-9 ——— 1O6-44-5 ————— 621-64-7 ————— 67-72-1 —————— 81-75-5 —————— 105-67-9 ————— 65-85-0 —————— 111-91-1 ————— 120-83-2 ————— 120-82-1 — - —— 91-20-3 —————— 106-47-8 ————— 87-68-3 —————— 91-57-6 —————— 77-47-4 —————— 30-06-2 —————— 95-95-4 ————— 91-58-7 ————— 88-74-4 —————— 131-11-3 ————— 208-96-8 ———— 6O6-20-2 ————— --Phenol —bis ( 2-Chloroethyl ) Ether — 2-Chlorophenol — 1 . 3-Dichlorobenzene — 1. 4-Dichlorobenzene —Benzyl Alcohol — 1 , 2— Dichlorobenzene —2 -Methy Iphenol — bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether ~4 -Methy Iphenol . . — N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __ — Hexachloroethane — Nitrobenzene _. — Isophorone — 2-Nitrophenol — 2 . 4 -Dinethy Iphenol — Benzoic Acid . .. — bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __ — — 2 , 4— Dichlorophenol — 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene — Naphthalene — 4-Chloroaniline ... .. — Hexachlorobutadiene — 4 -Chloro-3 -Methy Iphenol ... — 2 -Methy Inaphthalene — Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ___ ——2 , 4 , 6— Trichlorophenol — — 2 , 4 r 5— Trichlorophenol — 2 — Chloronaphthalene — 2-Nitroaniline — Dimethyl Phthalate — Acenaphthylene — 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene . _ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev. OOTQ PBCKP6E TUT 001 0544 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/nL) ML_ Level: (low/mad) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SapF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: ___ SBLK08 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX_60_ Lab Sample ID: SBLKQ8____ Lab File ID: GH067362A15 Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/15/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline__________ 83-32-9———————Acenaphthene_____\_______ 51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______ 100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol__________ 132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran___________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene_______ 84-66-2——————Diethylphthalata__________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73-7———————Fluorena______________ 100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________ 534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol_ 86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 101-55-3——————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_________ 87-86-5—•————Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8———————Phenanthrene___________ 120-12-7——————Anthracene_____________ 84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate_____ 206-44-0——————Fluoranthene___________ 129-00-0—————Pyrene______________________ 85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate____ 91-94-1———————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3——————Benzo( a) Anthracene______ 218-01-9——————Chrysene___________________ 117-81-7——————bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalata____ 205-99-2——————Benzo(b) Fluoranthene_____ 207-08-9—————Benzo (k) Fluoranthene____ 50-32-8———————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________ 193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___ 53-70-3———————Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene___ 191-24-2—————Benzo(g,h, i) Perylene____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 50 10 50 50 10 10 1.0 ^0 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuauuu FORM I SV-2 SftMPLE DQTP POCKQBE 1/87 Rev. TUT OO1 O54 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Contract: 68-D9-0032 Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 SAS No.: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: IQQQ (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) fi_ pH: ____ EPA SAMPLE MO. SBLK80 SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: SBLK8Q______ Lab File ID: GJ066466A20 Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: Q6/H/89 Dilution Factor: l.O GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) 108-95-2 —————— 111-44-4 ————— - 95-57-8 —————— - 541-73-1 ————— - 106-46-7 ————— - 100-51-6 ————— - 95-50-1 ———— •<— 95-48-7 —————— • 39638-32-9 ——— • 106-44-5 ————— • 621-64-7 ————— • 67-72-1 —————— • 98-95-3 —————— • 78-59-1 —————— • 88-75-5 —————— • 105-67-9 ————— • 65-85-0 —————— • 111-91-1 ————— • 120-83-2 ————— • 120-82-1 —— —— 91-20-3 —————— • 106-47-8 ————— 87-68-3 —————— 59-50-7 —————— 91-57-6 —————— 77-47-4 —————— 88-06-2 —————— 95-95-4-- ———— 91-58-7 —————— 88-74-4 —————— 131-11-3 ————— 208-96-8 ————— 606-20-2 ————— —Phenol — bia / 2-Chloroethvl > Ether — 2-Chlorophenol __.,_, _ —1 f 3-Dichlorobenzene — 1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene —Benzyl Alcohol — 1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene —2 -Methy Iphenol — bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether —4 -Methy Iphenol — N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __ — Hexachl or oethane —Nitrobenzene — Isophorone —2 -Ni trophenol — 2 . 4 -Dime thy Iphenol — Benzoic Acid .. . — bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __ —2 . 4-Dichlorophenol —1 . 2 . 4-Trichlorobenzene —Naphthalene — 4-Chloroaniline — Hexachlorobutadiene — 4 -Chloro-3 -Methy Iphenol --2-Methylnaphthalene — Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ___ — 2 . 4 . 6-Trichlorophenol — 2 . 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol ,. ,_. — 2-Chloronaphthalene — 2-Nitroaniline — Dimethyl Phthalate — Acenaphthylene — 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev. SBMPLE DffTff -•-.>-. ..-- . . ,'n- . TUT O01 O546 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Coda: COMPU Caaa Mo.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/watar) WATER Sanpla wt/vol: 1000 (g/nL) ML Laval: (low/mad) LOW % Moistura: not dac. ___ dac. ___ Extraction: (SapP/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Claanup: (Y/M) N._ pH: ___ SBLK80 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS Mo.: ______ SDG Mo.: BX260 Lab Sanpla ID: SBLKSO Lab Fila ID: GJ066466A20 Data Racaivad: _____ Date Extracted: 06/09/89 Data Analyzed: 06/11/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0___ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) 99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline__________ 83-32-9———————Acenaphthene____________ 51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______ 100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol__________ 132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran__________ 121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______ 84-66-2——————Diethylphthalata________ 7005-72-3————4-Chlorophenyl-pheny lather, 86-73-7--—————Fluorene_____________ 100-01-6—————4-Mitroaniline_________ 534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol 86-30-6———————N-Nitroaodiphanylanine (1)_ 101-55-3—————4-Broaophenyl-pheny lather_ 118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_______ 87-86-5-—•———Pentachlorophanol_______ 85-01-8——————Phenanthrene__________ 120-12-7—————Anthracene____________ 84-74-2———————Di-n-Butylphthalate______ 206-44-0—————Fluoranthene___________ 129-00-0—————Pyrene__________ 85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate____ 91-94-1——————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3——————Benzo (a) Anthracene______ 218-01-9—————Chryaene_____________ 117-81-7—————bia (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate. 117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____ 205-99-2—————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene____ 207-08-9————-Benzo (Jc) Fluoranthene____ 50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrane_________ 193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___ 53-70-3——————Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene___ 191-24-2—————Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamina 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu* uuuuuuu FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev. SBMPLE DQTB PBCKP6E •,- TUT 001 0547 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/nL) Q__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONG GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: ___ SBLK83 Contract: 68-D9-Q032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: SBLK83____ Lab File ID: GJ066463B04 Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: 06/09/89 Dilution Factor: 1.00 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 108-95-2 —— 111-44-4 —— 95-57-8 ——— 541-73-1 —— 106-46-7 —— 100-51-6 —— 95-50-1 ——— O K_ A O •* 4AJP«%A ^ «t A 106-44-5 —— 621-64-7 —— 67-72-1 ——— OO_^R_P 105-67-9 —— 65-85-0 ——— 111-91-1 —— 120-83-2 —— 120-82-1 —— 106-47-8 —— 87-68-3 ——— 59-50-7 ——— 91-57-6 ——— 77-47-4 ——— 88-06-2= ——— 95-95-4 ——— 91-58-7 ——— 88-74-4 ——— 131-11-3 —— ono— oc.a. _ _ 606-20-2 —— ——— bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether ——— -1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene ——— •! f 4-Dichlorobenzene ——— Benzyl Alcohol ——— 1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene _ ——— 2-Methylphenol ——— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether ———— 4-Methylphenol ——— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __ ——— Hexachloroethane ——— Nitrobenzene ———— 2-Mitrophenol - —— -bis ( 2 -Chloroethoxy ) Methane __ ——— Naphthalene ——— 2-Methylnaphthalene ——— 2-Nitroaniline ——— Dimethyl Phthalate ——— 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 1600 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 1600 330 1600 330 330 330 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Uau Uuuuu FORM I SV-1 SBMPLE DffTP PPCKPGE . 1/87 Rev. TUT 001 0548 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Coda: COMPU Casa Mo.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL' Sanple wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) S__ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SOMC GPC Cleanup: (Y/H) fl_ pH: ___ SBLK83 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS NO.: ______ SDC NO.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: SBLKB3______ Lab File ID: GJQ66463B04 Date Received: _____ Date Extracted: 06/09/89 Date Analyzed: Q6/09/89 Dilution Factor: l.QO CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG 99-09-2 ----- 83-32-9 —— — 51-28-5 —— ~ 100-02-7 —— - 132-64-9 —— - 121-14-2 ——— 84-66-2 ----- 7005-72-3 —— 86-73-7 —— ~ 100-01-6 —— - 534-52-1 —— - 86-30-6 ———— 101-55-3 —— - 118-74-1 —— - 87-86-5 —— — 85-01-8 ----- 120-12-7 —— - 84-74-2 ———— 206-44-0 ——— 129-00-0 ——— 85-68-7 ----- 56-55-3 — —— 218-01-9 —— - 117-81-7 ——— 117-84-0 —— - 205-99-2 —— - 207-08-9 — — 50-32-8 ———— 193-39-5 —— - 53-70-3 ———— 191-24-2 ——— ——— 3 -Nitroanil ine ——— 2 . 4-Dinitrophanol ——— 4-Nitrophenol ——— Dibenzofuran ——— 2 . 4-Dinitrotoluene ——— Diathylphthalata ——— 4 -Ni troani 1 ine —— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol —— N-Nitrosodiphenylamina (1) __ ——— Hexachlorobanzene , . ——— Pentachlorophenol , —— - Anthracene ,.. . ——— Dl-n-Butylphthalate . —— — Pyrena ——— Butylbenzylphthalate . —— — Chryaene —— bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate __ ——— Dl-n-Octyl Phthalate ——— Benzo(b)Pluoranthene ——— Benzo(k)Fluoranthene ,_. ——— Benzo(a)Pyrene _ .. ... —— Indenofl.2.3-cd)Pyrene . ——— Benzo<q.h.i)Perylene ... 1600 330 1600 1600 330 330 330 330 330 1600 1600 330 330 330 1600 330 330 330 330 330 330 660 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV-2 -,-_.*•' SBHPLE DPTP PBCKBGE 1/87 Rev. TUT OO1 O549 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) fi_ pH: ___ SBLK86 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: SBLK86 Lab File ID: GH067149B16 Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/15/89 Dilution Factor: l.O____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 108-95-2——————Phenol_________________ 111-44-4—————bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether___ 95-57-8——————2-Chlorophenol__________ 541-73-1—————1,3-Dichlorobenzene______ 106-46-7-——-—1,4-Dichlorobenzene_______ 100-51-6—————Benzyl Alcohol__________ 95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-48-7——————2-Methylphenol__________ 39638-32-9————bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether_ 106-44-5—————4-Methylphenol__________ 621-64-7—————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine_ 67-72-1———————Hexachl or oe thane_________ 98-95-3——————Nitrobenzene___________ 78-59-1——————Isophorone_____________ 88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol___________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol________ 65-85-0—————r— Benzoic Acid____________ 111-91-1—————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol_______ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene____ 91-20-3——————Naphthalene____________ 106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline_________ 87-68-3——————Hexachlorobutadiene______ 59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol___ 91-57-6——————2-Methylnaphthalene______ 77-47-4——————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene_ 88-06-2—————-2,4,6-Trichlorophenol____ 95-95-4——————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol_____ 91-58-7———————2 -Chloronaphthalene______ 88-74-4——————2-Nitroanil ine__________ 131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate_______ 208-96-8—————Acenaphthylene__________ 606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene_______ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev. SBMPLE DPTff PPCKP6E TUT 001 0550 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Nam«: COMPUCHEM LABS____________ Lab Code: COMPU case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: looo (g/mL) ML Level: (lov/aed) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) fi_ pH: ___ SBLK86 Contract: 6B-D9-0032 SAS NO.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: SBLK86_______ Lab File ID: CHQ67149B16 Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/15/89 Dilution Factor: i.o CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline__________ 83-32 -9 ———————Acenaphthene___________ 51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol________ 100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol_______________ 132-64-9——-——Dibenzofuran___________ 121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______ 84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate__________ 7005-72-3—•——-4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 86-73 -7——————Fluorene_____________ 100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________ 534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol 86-30-6——————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_ 101-55-3—————4-BroBophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_______ 87-86-5——————Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8——————Phenanthrene__________ 120-12-7—————Anthracene____________ 84-74-2———————Di-n-Butylphthalate______ 206-44-0—————Fluoranthene__________ 129-00-0—————Pyrene______________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1———————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3——————Benzo (a) Anthracene______ 218-01-9—————Chrysene_____________ 117-81-7—————bi»(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate______ 205-99-2—————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene____ 207-08-9—————Benzo (k) Fluoranthene_____ 50-32-8———————Benzo (a) Pyrene___________ 193-39-5——————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___ 53-70-3——————Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene___ 191-24-2—————Benzo (g,h,i)Perylene____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylanine 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev. SIMPLE DPTB PBCKflBE TUT 001 0551 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) N._ pH: ___ SBLK90 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: SBLK90_____ Lab File ID: GJQ66751AQ6 Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/12/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 108-95-2 ———— 111-44-4 ———— 95-57-8 ————— 541-73-1 ———— 106-46-7 ———— 100-51-6 ———— 95-50-1 ————— 106-44-5 ----- 621-64-7 ———— 67-72-1— ——— 78-59-1 —— —— 88-75-5 —— —— 105-67-9 ———— 65-85-0 —— —— 111-91-1 —— — 120-83-2 — —— 120-82-1 — —— 91-20-3 ————— 106-47-8 ———— 59-50-7 ————— 91-57-6 ————— 77-47-4 ————— 95-95-4 —— —— 91-58-7 —— —— 88-74-4 —— —— 131-11-3 ———— 606-20-2 ———— —— Phenol —— bis (2 -Chloroethy 1) Ether _ —— 2-Chlorophenol —— 1.3-Dichlorobenzene . — — 1 . 4-Dichlorobenzene —— Benzyl Alcohol ——1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene —— 2-Methvlphenol —— bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether _ —— 4 -Methy Iphenol —— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __ —— Hexachloroethane —— Nitrobenzene —— Isophorone —— 2-Nitrophenol —— 2 . 4-Dimethylohenol —— Benzoic Acid —— bis ( 2-Chloroethoxy ) Methane __ —— 2 . 4-Dichlorophenol —— 1 . 2 f 4-Trichlorobenzene ——Naphthalene —— 4-Chloroaniline —— Hexachlorobutadiene —— 4 -Chloro-3 -Methy Iphenol • —— 2-Methylnaphthalene • —— Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ___ —— 2 . 4 . 6-Trichlorophenol • —— 2 , 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol • —— 2-Chloronaphthalene • —— 2-Nitroaniline • —— Dimethyl Phthalate • —— Acenaphthy 1 ene • —— 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-1 SPMPL £ DP TP ~PPCKPGE 1/87 Rev. TUT 001 055 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample vrt/vol: IQQQ (g/mL) ML_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) H_ pH: ___ SBLK90 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS NO.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: SBLK9Q Lab File ID: GJ066751A06 Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: Q6/12/B9 Date Analyzed: 06/12/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L 99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline_________ 83-32-9 ——————Acenaphthene___________ 51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______ 100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol__________ 132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran___________ 121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______ 84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate_________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73-7--—•———Fluorene______________ 100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________ 534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol 86-30-6——————N-Nitro-odiphenylamine (1)_ 101-55-3—————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1——-——Hexachlorobenzene_______ 87-86-5——————Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8——•———Phenanthrene__________ 120-12 -7—————Anthracene____________ 84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate_____ 206-44 -0—————Fluoranthene________________ 129-00-0——————Pyrene________________ 85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate____ 91-94-1———————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine_____ 56-55-3——————Benzo (a) Anthracene______ 218-01-9—————Chrysene_____________ 117-81-7—————bis(2-Bthylhexyl)Phthalate. 117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____ 205-99-2——--——Benzo (b) Fluoranthene______ 207-08-9—————Benzo(k) Fluoranthene____ 50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________ 193-39-5—————Indeno( 1,2,3-cd) Pyrene_____ 53-70-3——————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene___ 191-24-2——————Benzo (g,h, i) Perylene_____ 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 SO 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev. 5PMPLE DQTP PPCKPGE TUT OO1 0553 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab N< : COMPUCHEM LABS SBLK99 Lab Code: COMPO Case Mo.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: IQQQ (g/mL) Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/H) H_ pH: ___ Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SIX! No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: SBLK99____ Lab File ID: CHQ66857A06 Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: Q6/13/89 Date Analyzed: 06/13/89 Dilution Factor: l^JJ____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 108-95-2——————Phenol_________________ 111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether___ 95-57-8——————2-Chlorophenol__________ 541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_______ 106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene_______ 100-51-6——————Benzyl Alcohol___________ 95-50-1————-1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol___________ 39638-32-9————bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether_ 106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol___________ 621-64-7—————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine_ 67-72-1——————Hexachloroethane________ 98-95-3——————Nitrobenzene____________ 78-59-1———-———Isophorone________________ 88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol____________ 105-67-9—————2,4-Dimethylphenol_______ 65-85-0———————Benzoic Acid____________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol_______ 120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene____ 91-20-3——————Naphthalene___________________ 106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline_________ 87-68-3 ——•———Hexachl orobutadiene___' 59-50-7——————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol___ 91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene______ 77-47-4——————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene__ 88-06-2———————2,4,6-TrichloroDhenol 95-95-4——————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol_____ 91-58-7——————2-Chloronaphthalene______ 88-74-4——————2-Nitroaniline__________ 131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate_______ 208-96-8—————Acenaphthylene_________ 606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene_______ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev. - V*^-1-'-" SBMPLE DffTP • =;*»•:.: - - •- -• ~ .' ~ v:,;.,-;—^ - :"•-. --. -*L'-. '- - - TUT O01 O554 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COKPUCHEM LABS__________ Lab Code: COMPP Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (lov/ned) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/H) H_ pH: ___ SBLK99 Contract: 68-09-0033 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: SBLK99_____ Lab File ID: GH066857A06 Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 06/13/89 Date Analyzed: 06/13/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline___________________ 83-32-9———————Acenaphthene___________ 51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______ 100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol__________ 132-64-9————--Dibenzofuran_______________ 121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______ 84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate_________ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 86-73-7———————Fluorene_______________ 100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________ 534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol 86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylanine (1)_ 101-55-3—————4-Broaophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_________ 87-86-5———-—-Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8——————Phenanthrene__________ 120-12-7—————Anthracene________________ 84-74-2———————Di-n-Butylphthalate______ 206-44-0—————Fluoranthene__________ 129-00-0—————Pyrene___________________ 85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1———————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3——•———Benzo (a) Anthracene________ 218-01-9—————Chrysene_____________ 117-81-7—————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____ 205-99-2—————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene____ 207-08-9——————Benzo (k) Fluoranthene_______ 50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________ 193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) Pyrene___ 53-70-3——————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene_____ 191-24-2—————Benzo (g,h,i)Perylene____ (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev. TUT OO1 O555 '^^^^.••:,^&^iSR^ IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Nan«: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: CQMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 1000 (g/mL) ML Level: (lov/ned) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ pH: ___ BY768 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: Lab File ID: 267129 CAS NO. COMPOUND GH067129B16 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Extracted: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: Q6/1S/89 Dilution Factor: i.o CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 108-95-2 —————— Phenol 111-44-4 ————— bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether 95-57-8 ——————— 2-Chlorophenol . . . 541-73-1 —————— 1. 3-Dichlorobenzene 95-48-7 ——————— 2-M.thYlph.no! . 39638-32-9 ———— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether 106-44-5 —————— 4-Methylphenol .. 621-64-7 ————— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylanine 98-95-3 ——————— Nitrobenzene „ . , ... 78-59-1 ——————— Isophorone , ,._, ,.. . _ „. 88-75-5 ——————— 2-Nitrophenol 105-67-9 ——————— 2 P 4-Dinethylphenol 65-85-0 ——————— Benzoic Acid 111-91-1 ————— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane 120-83-2 ——————— 2r4-Dichlorophenol „.,._ _.. ,., 120-82-1 ——————— 1 f 2 , 4-Trichlorobenzene 91-20-3 ——————— Naphthalene _ . . . .. . 106-47-8 ——————— 4-Chloroaniline ,,. . .. 87-68-3 —————— >Hexachlorobutadiene 59-50-7 ——————— 4-Ghloro-3-Methylphenol 77-47-4 —————— Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 88-06-2 ——————— 2f4f6-Trichlorophenol_. . ..... 95-95-4 ——————— 2r4r5-Trlchlorophenol .. __ _., . 91-58-7—— — —— -2-Chloronaphthalene 88-74-4 ——————— 2-Nitroanil ine 131-11-3 ——————— Di-M.thyl Ph thai at. _ , ._,. _ ., 606-20-2 ——————— 2,6-Dinitrotoluene... _ __.,,,. 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu*#T uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rex SOMPLE DPT0 POCKQBE .-. - ".:"•*•--- 001 0556 979 I;;-.;*' i~-- ^"IS : _i^-:?:*'&•'''"'- - .-'•--.".''•" : r^-;..-.:'•:••.•.•.}.;- •••••••«•?•:•>= --.- 1A V VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: CQMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: s.Q (g/mL) Level: (low/ned) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY768 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 267129 Lab File ID: CN067129B12 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L 74-87-3——————Chloromethane___________ 74-83-9——————Broaomethane____________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride____________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1——————Acetone________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroe thane________ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________________ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane__________ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone________________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5—•————-Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4—————-Bromod ichl orome thane_________ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene___ 79-01-6 ——————Tr ichloroethene_________ 124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane_______ 79-00-5—————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43-2——————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6——•—Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoforn__________________ 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6—————2-Hexanone_________________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3—————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4 —————Ethylbenzene_______________ 100-42-5—————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes___________ 10 10 10 10 3 16 21 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U U U U BJ u Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. ' . . . SAMPLE DPTP PBCKBGE - - - OO1 0557 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.Q (g/mL) ML Level: (low/ned) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY767 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG NO.: BX26Q Lab Sample ID: ;____1__2_____ Lab File ID: CN067132B12 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 74-87-3——————Chloromethane___________ 74-83-9-——————Bromomethane____________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chl or oe thane____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1———————Acetone________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3—•—•——Chloroform_____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-27-4———————Bromodichlorome thane______ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane______ 10061-01-5-———cis-1,3-Dichloropropene___ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1——————Dibronochloromethane_______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane_____ 71-43-2——————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromofona_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6—————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5—————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_____________ FORM I VOA 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Ua U U U U 1/87 Rev. 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: CQMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Coda: COMPU Cas« No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML_ Level: (lov/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP CAS NO. COMPOUND BY766 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: 267131______ Lab File ID: CNQ67131B12 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: l.Q_____ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L 74-87-3——————Chl or ome thane__________ 74-83-9-——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1——————Acetone______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_____________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform___________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23 -5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________ 75-27-4———————Bromodichlorome thane____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1————— Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——-———1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2——————Benzene______________ 10061-02-6—•——Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75—25—2——————Broaoform 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone________ 591-78 -6——————2 -Rexanone____________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 108-88-3—————Toluene______________ 108-90-7-—————Chlorobenzene_________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5—————styrene__________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 101 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U U U U BJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SPMPLE DPTR TUT 001 0559 IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: IQQQ (g/mL) ML_ Level: (lov/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H__ pH: ___ SBLK07 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: SBLK07_______ Lab Pile ID: GJ067163C16 Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/16/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 108-95-2——————Phenol__________________ 111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether____ 95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol___________ 541-73-1—————1,3-Dichlorobenzene___________ 106-46-7———~i, 4-Dichlorobenzene____________ 100-51-6—————Benzyl Alcohol_________________ 95-50-1——————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______ 95-48-7———————2-Methyl phenol___________ 39638-32-9————bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether_ 106-44-5—————4-Methylphenol___________ 621-64-7—————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylanine__ 67-72-1——————Hexachloroethane_________ 98-95-3——————Nitrobenzene____________ 78-59-1———-——Isophorone_________________ 88-75-5——————2-Nitrophenol___________ 105-67-9——————2,4-Dinethylphenol________ 65-85-0——————Benzoic Acid_______________ 111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__ 120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol_______ 120-82-1-——-—1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene____ 91-20-3——————Naphthalene____________ 106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline_________ 87-68-3-——•——Hexachlorobutadiene___________ 59-50-7—————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol___ 91-57-6——————2-Methylnaphthalene______ 77-47-4——————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene__ 88-06-2——————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol________ 95-95-4——————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol____ 91-58-7 ~———-2-Chloronaphthalene___________ 88-74-4——————2 -Nitroaniline_________ 131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate__________ 208-96-8—————Acenaphthylene______________ 606-20-2—————2,6-Dinitrotoluene___________ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 10 50 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev. \ =- SRHPLE TUT 001 056O 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: coMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 SAS No.: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: IQQQ (g/mL) ML_ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ dec. ___ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N._ pH: ____ Contract: 66-D9-QQ32 SBLK07 SDG No.: BX260 Lab sample ID: SBLKQ? Lab File ID: GJ067163C16 Date Received: ______ Date Extracted: 06/14/89 Date Analyzed: 06/16/89 Dilution Factor: l.o CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline_________ 83-32-9———————Acenaphthene____________ 51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol________ 100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol__________ 132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran___________ 121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______ 84-66-2———————DiethvlDhthalate _____ 7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_ 86-73-7———•——Fluorene______________ 100-01-6—————4-Hitroaniline_________ 534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol_ 86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylanine (1)_ 101-55-3—————4-Bronophenyl-phenylether_ 118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_______ 87-86-5——————-Pentachlorophenol_______ 85-01-8——————Phenanthrene__________ 120-12-7——————Anthracene___________________ 84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate_____ 206-44-0—————Fluoranthene__________ 129-00-0—————Pyrene______________ 85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____ 91-94-1——————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine___ 56-55-3-—————-Benzo (a) Anthracene____ .. 218-01-9—————Chrysene_____________ 117-81-7—————bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. 117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate______ 205-99-2——————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene 207-08-9—————Benzo(k) Fluoranthene____ 50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________ 193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___ 53-70-3——————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene___ 191-24-2—————Benzo (g,h,i)Perylene______ 50 10 so 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev. SPMPLE oara PPCKPBE TUT OO1 0561 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) J Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 14 Column: (pack/cap) CAP Contract: 68-D9-0032 BY774 SAS No.: SDG No.: BX2S8 Lab Sample ID: 267125____ Lab File ID: GHQ6712SC18 Date Received: Q6/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/15/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) 74-87-3——————Chloronethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_____________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane__________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4———.———1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3 ——-———Chloroform______________ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane_________ 78-93-3——•—-—2-Butanone__________________ 71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane___ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-2 7-4—————-Bromodichlor one thane____ 78-87-5—•————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5-———cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79_Ol-6—————-Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1—————Ddbromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-4 3-2———-———Benzene__________________ 10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2-—————Bromoform____________ 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______ 591-78 -6-——•——'2 -Hexanone_______________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7-——-——Chlorobenzene_____________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5—————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 12 12 12 12 14 64 6 6 6 6* 6 12 6 6 12 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. sanpLE ' • • r ' ' " ' - ' ' TUT ooi 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________ Lab Cod*: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.C Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 19 Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY775 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258_ (g/mL) CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 267126_____ Lab File ID: GH067126A18 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chl or one thane____________ 74-83-9——————Bromome thane____________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_________ 67-64-1——————Acetone______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Dimulfide_________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3——————Chloroform______________ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane________ 78-93-3-—•————2-Butanone_______________ 71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroetharie______ 56-23 -5——————Carbon Tetrachlorid«______ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-27-4-—————-Bromodichloromethane______ 78-87-5--———-1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6 ———•——Trichloroethene__________ 124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane_______ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43-2——————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6———-Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene___ 75-25-2 ——————Bromof orm______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4 ————~ Tetrachlor oethene_________ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___ 108-88-3--———-Toluene________________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene____________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene____________ 100-42-5—————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 12 12 12 12 15 220 6 6 6 6 7 6 6 12 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 6 6 6 6 6 6 1 Uuu•H uJuuuuuuuu -U FORM I VGA 1/87 Rev. SBMPLE DPTQ PBCKQBE TUT 001 0563 -;.--..,-. *:-• :„•.:....•$• 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS____________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) j Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 18 Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY773 Contract: 68-D9-OQ32 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX_58_ Lab Sample ID: 267124_____ Lab File ID: GH067124A18 Date Received: 06/12/8? Date Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0______ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane___________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane____________ 75-01-4——————vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1——————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0-—————Carbon Disulfide____________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane_______ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dlchloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3——————-Chloroform______________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane_____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride_____ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate___________ 75-27-4-——————Bromodichloromethane_____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_________ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene_____ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene___________ 124-48-1——————>Dibromochloromethane______ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43 -2 ————•——Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 75-25-2—————Bromoform___________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______ 591-78-6—————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene______________ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane__ 108-8 8-3 ——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——•———Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene______________ 100-42-5—————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7————Total xylenes__________ 12 12 12 12 11 130 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 6 6 12 6 6 6 6 6 6 43 6 6 12 12 6 6 8 6 4*0- irtfT uu u ut FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SRMPLE DP TO PPCKPBE TUT OO1 0564 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE MO. Lab Name: CQMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case Mo.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) t Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. 20 Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY772 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: 267123____ Lab File ID: GH067123A18 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloronethane____________ 74-83-9——————Bromonethane_____________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3—•———-Chloroethane_____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride________ 67-64-1———————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_________ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_________________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride________ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate________________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane______ 78-87-5————•—-1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene____ 79-01-6—————'—Trichloroethene___________ 124-48-1—•———Dibromochloromethane______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43 -2——————Benzene___________________ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene___ 75-25-2—————-Bromofora____________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Rexanone______________ 127-18-4—-———Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___ 108-88-3—————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——-——-Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene____________ 100-42-5—————Styrene__________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes____________ 13 13 13 13 16 230 6 6 6 6 6 9 6 6 13 6 6 6 6 6 6 60 6 6 13 13 6 6 6 6 45 6 6 uuuu -WO* uJuuuuuuu v-trf u FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SQHPLE DOT* f L I T O01 056' 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) J Level: (low/med) MED BY771 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 % Moisture: not dec. 18 Column: (pack/cap) CAP Lab Sample ID: 267122____ Lab File ID: C2R67122B23 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/18/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane_________ 74-83 -9-—————Bromomethane__________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———•——Chloroe thane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone___________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-9 3-3———————2 -Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5-——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6—•—•————Trichloroethene_______ 12 4 - 4 8 -1—————Dibromochlor omethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43 -2——————Benzene_____________ 10061-02-6———-Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bronoform ___________ 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone___________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3—————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene_________ 100-41-4 —————Ethylbenzene_________ 100-42-5—————Styrene____________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 1500 1500 1500 1500 760 1500 760 760 760 760 760 760 1500 760 760 1500 760 760 760 760 760 760 760 760 760 1500 1500 760 760 760 760 670 760 890 Uu UuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. DBTB PPCKOGE TUT OO1 0566 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. 12058_ Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS Lab Code: COMPU Case Ho. ___ Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/oL) Level: (low/Bed) MED % Moisture: not dec. 14 Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY770 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: _______ SDG No. : BX258 Lab Sample ID: 267121____ Lab File ID: C2R67121A23 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/16/89 Dilution Factor: 7.1 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/KG 74-87-3 ——————chloromethane___________ 74-83-9——————Bromonethane________________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3———•——-Chloroethane_____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride________ 67-64-1———————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0——————carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3——————l,l-Dichloroethane____________ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3-——•——Chloroform__________________ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane___________ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5——————carbon Tetrachloride______ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-27-4——•—•——Bromodichloromethane__________ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5————ci»-l,3-Dichloropropene______ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene_____________ 124-48-1——-----Dibromochloromethane______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-4 3-2———————Benzene______________________ 10061-02-6-———Tran»-l,3-Dichloropropene_____ 75-25-2——————Broaoform 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_________ 591-78-6—————2-Hexanone_________________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_____._____ 79-34-5'——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_____ 108-88-3—————Toluene______________________ 108-90-7————Chlorobenzene_________________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene_________________ 100-42-5—————styrene______________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes____________ 10000 10000 10000 10000 5200 10000 5200 5200 5200 5200 5200 5200 10000 5200 5200 10000 5200 5200 5200 5200 5200 5200 2000 5200 5200 10000 10000 5200 5200 52000 5200 37000 5200 220000 Uu UuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJuuuuuu u FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SAMPLE DPTf) UT O0.1 O567 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS____________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. 16 Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY765 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sample ID: 267116_____ Lab File ID: C3R67116A23 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/19/89 ^ j Dilution Factor: 3.3 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 74-87-3 —————— Chloromethane ___________________ 74-83-9 —————— Bromomethane ____________ 75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride ___________ 75-00-3 —————— Chloroethane ____________ 75-09-2 —————— Methylene Chloride ________ 67-64-1 —————— Acetone ________________ 75-15-0 —————— Carbon Disulfide _________ 75-35-4 ——————— 1,1-Dichloroethene ________ 75-34-3 ——————— 1,1-Dichloroethane ________ 540-59-0 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ 67-66-3 —————— Chloroform ______________ 107-06-2 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethane ________ 78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanone ________ ; ______ 71-55-6 —————— 1, 1, l-Trichloroethane ______ 56-23-5 —————— Carbon Tetrachloride ______ 108-05-4 ————— Vinyl Acetate __________________ 75-27-4 —————— Bromodichloromethane __________ 78-87-5 —————— 1 , 2-Dichloropropane _______ 10061-01-5 ———— cis-l,3-Dichloropropene ____ 79-0 1-6 ——————— Tr ichloroe thene ___________ 124-48-1 —————— Dibromochl or one thane _______ 79-00-5 —————— 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane ______ 71-43-2———— —— Benzene ________________ 10061-02-6— —— Trana-l,3-Dichloropropene ___ 75-25-2 ——————— Bromofon _____________________ 108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_ __________ 591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanone _______________ 127-18-4 ————— Tetrachloroethene ________ 79-34-5 ——————— 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ___ 108-88-3 —— • ———— Toluene ___________________ 108-90-7-- — - — -Chlorobenzene _____________________ 100-41-4 ————— Ethylbenzene ____________ 100-42-5 ————— Styrene ________________ 1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenes ____________ 5000 5000 5000 5000 2500 5000 2500 2500 2500 2500 2500 2500 5000 2500 2500 5000 2500 2500 2500 2500 2500 2500 2500 2500 2500 5000 5000 2500 2500 2500 2500 8900 2500 2200 Uu U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UJ FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. S0HPLE DPTP PBCKOee TUT 001 O568 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________ Lab Code: CQMPU case No.: 12QSB Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: Q.2Q (g/mL) ML_ Level: (lov/n«d) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY764 Contract: 68-D9-QQ32 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260_ Lab Sample ID: 267130_____ Lab File ID: CR067130B12 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane__________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1——————Acetone______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3—————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform_________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_________ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane___ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate_________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichlorome thane____ 78-87-5--—•——1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1—————Dibromochlorome thane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2——————Benzene______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————BroaoCorm______________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5——————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3—————Toluene______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5—————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenea__________ 250 250 250 250 31 190 130 130 130 130 130 130 250 130 130 250 130 130 130 130 130 130 4400 130 130 250 250 130 130 3700 130 1700 130 4200 Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuu u u f?i>-' 1 o^ FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SftHPLE DPT ft TUT 001 0569 w- :,••„»•-'':--~. ^•£>v'-1*j&Tf' 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) J Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP CAS NO. COMPOUND VBLKA2 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: VBLKA2____ Lab File ID: GH06B680A19 Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 06/21/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 ——————Chl oromethane__________; 74-83-9——————-Bromomethane______________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————-Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1——————Acetone______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_____ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform___________ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroe thane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________ 75-27-4——————Bromod ichl oromethane____ 78-87-5————-—1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2——————Benzene_________________ 10061-02-6————Tran»-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bronofora_______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3—————Toluene___________________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene___________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5—————Styrene____________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 10 7 30 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SPHPLE DffTff PPCKase TUT 001 0570 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP VBLKAD contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: VBLKAD_____ Lab File ID: CB890611A10 Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 06/11/89 Dilution Factor: 1. Q_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3——————Chlororaethane__________ 74-83 -9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroe thane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———————Chloroform____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3 ———————2 -Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene___________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43-2———————Benzene______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bronoform_____________ 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3———————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_____________ 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SOHPLE DBTP POCKPeE TUT 001 O57.1. I i 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE HO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP VBLKJL Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: VBLKJL Lab File ID: CB890614B12 Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 74-87-3———————Chlorome thane__________ 74-83 -9 ———-——Bromomethane____________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride______• 75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1——————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_____ 75-34-3——————1, l-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform _________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6———————1, l, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene ______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2—————-Bronoform_________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6—————2-Hexanone___________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_____________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_______ 10 10 10 10 1 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U U U UJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SPMPLE DBTQ PQCKReE TUT 001 0572 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SJ.MPLE HO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML_ Level: (low/Bed) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP VBLKMR Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: VBLKMR Lab File ID: CC890613B19 Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 06/13/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________ 74-83-9-—•—————Bromome thane____________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1———————Acetone________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————l,l-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0-——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———————Chloroform____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone______________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1—————-Dibromochloromethane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1, 2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3———————Toluene__________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SQMPLE OffTP PPCK06E OO1 O 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM IABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) J Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP VBLKQ7 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: VBLKQ7_____ Lab File ID: GH066712C10 Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 06/13/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________________ 74-83-9——————•Bromomethane_____________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane_____________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride________ 67-64-1———————Acetone_____________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3———————Chloroform______________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_______________ 71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride______ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_____________ 75-27-4———————Bromodicnloromethane_______ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene____ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_____________ 124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane_______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43-2———————Benzene______________________ 10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene___ 75-25-2————•——Bromoforn____________________ 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_______________________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene____- 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene______________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene__________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xvlenes ________ 10 10 10 10 6 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 ' 5 5 5 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SAMPLE DPTQ POCKBQl TUT 001 0574 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE MO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code;'CQMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP VBLKPA Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: VBLKPA,_____ Lab File ID: CC890612C10 Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 06/12/89 Dilution Factor: i.o___ CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 74-87-3--—————•Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———————Chloroform_________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4—————vinyl Acetate_________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43-2———————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2——————Bromoform____________ 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pen tanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5——————l ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene______________________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________ 100-42-5——————Styrene________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_________ 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VGA 1/87 Rev. SPMPLE DPTP PPCKBBE TUT 001 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPOCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: COMPP Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) j Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP VBLKP9 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: VBLKP9_____ Lab File ID: GH0665Q2A18 Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: Q6/1Q/B9 Dilution Factor: 1.0_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/KG 74 -87-3 ———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——•———Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______ «7-64-l———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide___________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3———————Chloroform___________________ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4-—•————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6———————Tr ichloroethene__________ 124-48-1——————Dlbromochl or ome thane_______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-4 3 -2———————Benzene_______________ 10O61-02-6-—•——Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78 -6————-2 -Hexanone____________ 127-18-4———•——Tetrachloroethene_________ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene________________ 108-90-7——•———Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5——————Styrene______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 10 6 15 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Uu Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SBMPLE DPTB PBCKBQE TUT 001 05 76 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______ Contract: 68-D9-0032 EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: COMPU case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) Level: (lov/ned) MED % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP VBLKR8 SAS No.: SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: VBLKRS_____ Lab File ID: CN066B86A23 Date Received: _____ Date Analyzed: 06/13/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0______ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/KG 75-01-4 ——————— Vinvl Chloride 75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethane 75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride 67-64-1 ——————— Acetone. _ 75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Diaulfide _ „ 75-35-4 ——————— 1.1-Dichloroethene ,„.,.. .., ,.„ 75-34-3 ——————— lfl-Dichloroethane 540-59-0 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ 67-66-3 ——————— Chloroform 107-06-2 —————— If2-Dichloroethane _,.,. _ ,.. 78-93-3 ——————— 2 -Butanone 71-55-6 ——————— lflrl-Trichloroethane . 56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride , , 108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acetate 10061-01-5 ————— ci«-lf 3-Dichloropropene _ . 79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene 79-00-5 ——————— 1 . 1 . 2-Trichloroethane 71-43-2 ——————— Benzene 10061-02-6 ———— Tran»-l,3-Dichloropropene ___ ^ |P ^ (5 «* VfcMlMMM V*M|W« 108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanone _ 127-18-4 —————— Tetrachloroethene , ..... , 79-34-5 —————— 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ___ 108-88-3 —————— Toluene 108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene , . , . . , . 100-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene 100-42-5 —————— Styrene 1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenea 1300 1300 1300 1300 440 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 1300 630 630 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 1300 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 Uu UuJuauuua0uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuaauu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SPMPLE DffTff TUT O577 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Nana: COMPUCHEM LABS________ Lab Coda: COMPU casa No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/watar) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) J Leval: (low/mad) MED % Moistura: not dac. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP VBLKR9 Contract: 68-D9-QQ32 SAS No.: _____ SDG NO.: BX25EL Lab Sanpla ID: VBLKR9____ Lab Fila ID: CNQ66aa7C23 Data Racaived: ______ Data Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3 —— • ————— Chloromathana 74-83-9 ——————— Bronomethane 75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chlorida 75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethana 75-09-2 ——————— Mathylena Chlorida 67-64-1 ——————— Acetone 75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Diaulfida 75-35-4- —— - ——— 1 . 1-Dichloroathana 75-34-3 ——————— lf 1-Dichloroathana 540-59-0 ————— i, 2-Dichloroathana (total) __ 107-06-2 —————— 1 f 2-Dichloroathana 78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanona 71-55-6 ——————— lrlfl-Trichloroethane 56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tatrachlorida . . , 108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acatata 78-87-5 ——————— 1.2-Dichloropropane 10061-01-5 ———— cis-l,3-Dichloropropana _ 79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroathana 79-00-5 ——————— 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, 71-43-2 ——————— Banzana 10061-02-6—— — —Trana-1 , 3-Dichloropropene ___ 75-25-2 —— • ———— Bromof orm ., 108-10-1 —————— 4-Mathyl-2-Pentanona . . . 591-78-6 —————— 2 -Haxanona 127-18-4 —— • ———— Tatrachloroathana 79-34-5; —————— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tatrachloroathana ___ 108-88-3 —————— Toluene 108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene 100-41-4 —————— Ethylbanzane 100-42-5 —————— Styrana ,. 1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylanea 1300 1300 1300 1300 470 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 1300 630 630 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 1300 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 Uu UuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. S0MPLE DPTff TUT 001 0578 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_______ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) S Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP VBLKS1 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX2S8 Lab Sample ID: VBLKS1_____ Lab File ID: GH067175A1B Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 06/14/89 Dilution Factor: i.o_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————•Bronomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3--—————Chloroform_____________________ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane___ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride_______ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_____________ 75-27-4——————Bronodichloromethane____ 78-87-5--——-——1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1—————Dibromochlorome thane_____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____ 71-43 -2——————Benzene_______________ 10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2--—————Bro-oform______________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4 —————Tetrachloroethene______ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3—————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7-————-Chlorobenzene____________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5—————Styrene_____________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_________ 10 10 10 10 11 10 5 5 5 5 2 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U U U UJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FORM I VGA 1/87 Rev. DOTP 001 OS79 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) { Level: (low/Bed) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP CAS NO. COMPOUND Contract: 68-D9-OQ32 VBLKS2 SAS No.: SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: VBLKS2____ Lab Pile ID: GH067176C18 Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 06/15/89 Dilution Factor: JjJZ______ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride______________ 75-00-3-——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______ 67-64-1———————Acetone_____________________ 75-15-0——————-Carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform____________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane___ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichl oromethane____ 78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6————•—-Trichloroethene_________ 124-48-1—-—•——Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane_____ 71-43-2——————Benzene___________________ 10061-02-6—•——Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform___________________ 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_____. 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene____________________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene__________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene______________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_______________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________ 10 10 10 10 7 27 5 5 5 5 2 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 U U U UJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Uau U U U U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SBHPLE DP TO PQCKBSE TUT ooi osso 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS______ Lab Code: COMPU Case No.: 120S8 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Sample vrt/vol: 5.0 (g/fflL) ML._ Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP CAS HO. COMPOUND VBLKSM Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX260 Lab Sample ID: VBLKSM_____ Lab File ID: CB890613A19 Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 06/13/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0______ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________ 74-83-9—————-Bromomethane___________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_______ 67-64-1——————Acetone_______________ 75-15-0——————carbon Disulfide________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total). 67-66-3——————Chloroform__________________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone______________ 71-55-6——————i, i, l-Trichloroethane____ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________ 75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__ 79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___ 71-43-2——————Benzene____________ 10061-02-6--——Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________ 108-10-1——-———4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________ 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______ 79-34-5———————1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane_ 108-88-3——————Toluene_____________ 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene_________ 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________ 100-42-5—————Styrene___________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_________ 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Uu Uuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SttffPLE DPTP PQCKQBE TU ooj. 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM IABS________ Lab Code: COMTO case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) J Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP Contract: 6B-D9-OQ32 VBLKT7 SAS No. SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: VBLKT7____ Lab Pile ID: CNQ6739QA23 Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 06/16/89 Dilution Factor: l.Q_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3———————Chloromethane_____________ 74-83-9——————Bromomethane____________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_______________ 75-00-3--——-——Chloroethane____________________ 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride________ 67-64-1——————Acetone_____________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_____________ 75-34-3——————1, l-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3——————Chloroform________________________ 107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane____________ 78-93-3———-——2-Butanone______________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_______ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_________ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_______________ 75-27-4————•——-Bromodichloromethane________ 78-87-5—————— 1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene____ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene___________ 124-48-1——-———Dlbromochloromethane_________ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43-2——————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6————-Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene___ 75-25-2———————Bromoform__________________ 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pent anone_______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______________ 127-18-4 —————Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___ 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________________ 108-90-7-—•———Chlorobenzene______________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene____________ 100-42-5—————Styrene_____________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes____________ 1300 1300 1300 1300 630 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 1300 630 630 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 1300 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 Uu U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Ua Uau FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SPHPLE DPTP PBCKfteE~ TUT OOi 0582 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS;________ Lab Cod«: COMPU case No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) J Level: (lov/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) CAP Contract: 68-D9-0032 VBLKT8 SAS No.: SDG No.: BX2S_8_ Lab Sample ID: VBLKT8____ Lab File ID: CN067391B23 Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 06/18/89 Dilution Factor: l.o___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-87-3-——————Chloronethane____________ 74-83-9———————Bronomethane_____________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75-00-3——————Chloroethane_____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride__________ 67-64-1——————Acetone___________________ 75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________ 75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3—————Chloroform______________ 107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_______________ 71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride______ 108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate___________ 75-27-4--—————Bromodichloromethane______ 78-87-5-——•———1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10061-01-5———-cia-l,3-Dichloroprop«n«____ 79-01-6-—•———Tr ichloroethene__________ 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_______ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43-2——————Benzene________________ 10061-02-6——-—"Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene___ 75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________________________ 108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_______________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene________ 79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___ 108-88-3——————Toluene_________________ 108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene____________ 100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene____________ 100-42-5——————Styrene_________________ 1330-20-7—————Total xylenes______________ 1300 1300 1300 1300 630 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 1300 630 630 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 1300 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 Uu Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. ._.SAMPLE t>ara TUT 001 058: 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: CQMPOCHEM LABS________ Lab Code: COMPU Gas* No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4.0 (g/mL) J Level: (low/med) MED % Moisture: not dec. ___ ColuBiir (pack/cap) CAP VBLKZ6 Contract: 68-D9-0032 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: VBLKZq____ Lab Pile ID: C2R68295C23 Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed: 06/21/89 Dilution Factor: l.o___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 74-a 7-3 —————Chl oroaethane_______ 74 -B 3 -9————-—»Bromomethane______________ 75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________ 75 -0 0 - 3 ——————Chloroethane_____________ 75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride________ 67-64-1———————Acetone_________________ 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide__________ 75-35-4——•————1,1-Dichloroethene________ 75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________ 5*0-59-0——r———1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ 67-66-3 ——————•Chloroform____________________ 1O7-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________ 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_______________ 71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______ 56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride______ 108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate____________ 75-2 7 -4——————Bromodichloromethane_______ 73-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_______ 10O61-01-5-—•——-cis-1,3-Dichloropropene____ 79—01-6———————Trichloroethene___________ 124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane___________ 79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______ 71-43-2——————Benzene_________________ 10O61-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene___ 75 —2 5—2 ——>—>———Bromo form 1O8-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______ 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______________ 127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene________ 7»-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___ 1O8-88-3——————Toluene___________________________ 1O8-90-7—————Chlorobenzene___________ 1OO-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_____________ 10O-42-5—————Styrene______________________ 1330-20-7—————Total Xylanes____________ 1300 1300 1300 1300 350 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 1300 630 630 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 1300 1300 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 Uu UuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SPHPLE DBT0 PPCKQBE TUT 001 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Nan«: COMPUCHEM LABS Lab Coda: COMPU Casa No.: 12058 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample vt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) j Level: (low/med) LOW % Moisture: not dec. _12. Column: (pack/cap) CAP BY769 Contract: 68-D9-OQ32 SAS No.: ______ SDG No.: BX258 Lab Sample ID: 267120____ Lab File ID: GH067120C18 Date Received: 06/12/89 Date Analyzed: 06/15/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0 GAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG 75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride 75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride 67-64-1 ——————— Acetone 75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Diaulfida ... _ 75-35-4 ——————— lfl-Dichloroethene . _ 75-34-3 ——————— 1.1-Dichloroethane . ,,. . , S40-59-0 ————— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __ 67-66-3 ——————— Chloroform , , , , 1O7-06-2 —————— 1 f 2-Dichloroethane 78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanona 71-55-6 ——————— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane S«-2 3 -5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride 108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acetate 75-27-4——- ———— Bromodichloromethane 78-87-5 ——————— 1 . 2-Dichloropropane J.0061-01-5-- —— ~cis-l 1 3-Dichloropropene 79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene 124-48-1 —————— Dibromochl orome thane . _ _ 79-00-5 ——————— 1. lr 2-Trichloroethane 10061-02-6 ———— Trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene ___ 75— 2 5-2 — •—— —— -Bromof orm lt»-10-l —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone KOt • 7a«4hM«.._«...^_tfA'Kr**mnA 127-18-4 —————— Tetrachloroethene 79-34-5 —————— 1,1,2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ 1M-88-3 —————— Toluene 108-90-7 — - — •—— Chlorobenzene 1OO-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene 100-42-5 ————— Styrene 1330-20-7 ————— Total Xvlenes 11 11 11 11 48 60 6 6 6 6 6 -2- 6 11 6 6 11 6 6 6 6 6 6 21 6 6 11 11 66 256 130 6 280 Uu utri/<r B* B-tfT U U U U BS-U. U U U Uuuuuuuu uuuu •H- UT u u u1 FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. SBMPLE TUT OO1 0585 1C SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE 80. BY768 Lab Nama: COMPCCHEM IABS________ Contract: 68-D9-0032 Lab Coda: CQMPP Caaa No.: 12058 SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX26Q Matrix: (soil/watar) WATER Sanpla wt/vol: looo (g/nL) Ml. Laval: (low/nad) LOW % Moistura: not dac. ___ dac. ___ Extraction: (SapP/Cont/Sonc) SEPF GPC Claanup: (Y/H) M_ pH: ____ Lab Sanpla ID: 2*7129_____ Lab Fila ID: CHO67129B16 Data Racaivad: Q6/12/89 Data Extracted: 06/14/89 Data Analyzad: 06/15/89 Dilution Factor: 1.0 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 99-09-2 ——————— 3 -Nltroanil ina 51-28-5 ——————— 2,4-Dinitrophanol _ . __ 100-02-7 —————— 4-Nitrophanol , 132-64-9 ——————— Dibanzofuran 121-14-2 ——————— 2r4-DinitrotoluaM .... ,..._ 84-66-2 ——————— Diathylphthalata 86-73-7 - ——— —— Fluorana 100-01-6 —————— 4-Nitroanilina , . 534-52-1 ————— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Mathylphanol __ 86-30-6 —————— H-Nitroaodiphanylaaina ( 1) __ 101-55-3 ————— 4 -Bronophany 1 -phany lathar __ 118-74-1 ————— -Haxachlorobanzana 120-12-7 —————— Anthracana 84-74-2 ——————— Di-n-Butylphthalata 206-44 -0 —————— Fluoranthana 129-00-0 —————— Pyrana 85-68-7 ——————— Butylbanzylphthalata , 91-94-1 ——————— 3r3'-Dichlorobanzidina 56-55-3-- ————— Banzo (a ) Anthracana ,,. _„ _ 218-01-9 —————— Chryaana 117-81-7 ————— bis (2-Ethylhaxyl) Phthalata __ 117-84-0 —————— Dl-n-Octyl Phthalata 205-99-2-- — —— -Banzo (b) Fluoranthana _ , _ _ .. 207-08-9 —————— Banzo (k) Fluoranthana _ _ . 50-32-8 ——————— Banzo(a)Pyrana _ 193-39-5 ——————— Indano ( 1 , 2 r 3-cd> Pyrana. 53-70-3 ——————— Dibanzo (a rh) Anthracana 191-24-2 —————— Banzo(qrhr i) Parylana 1) - Cannot ba aaparatad froa Diphanylamina 50 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 - . - auuuuu4h^T uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu^7 uuuuuuu FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rav. SPHPLE DffTP PBCKOBE '.^^«-i,-.. ,^y*§£££-'--.'- :-.- II I I I REFERENCE NO. 9 I I I I I I I i I TUT OOi O587 CL.J Federal Programs Coi ^ration March 31, 1989 Ms. Caroline Kwan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10278 Project: Document No: Subject: EPA Contract No: 68-01-7331 T648-C02-EP-CZUU-1 CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary of the 104(e) Letter Response Sampling Tutu Wellfield Area Work Assignment 648 Dear Ms. Kwan, The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the balance of the CLP analysis results for the 104(e) letter response samples collected in the Tutu Wellfield Area, St Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands from September 8 through September 15, 1988. The results of three samples, two which were collected at the Tutu Esso Service Station and one at the Tutu Texaco Service Station, were submitted to you in a report dated March 30, 1989. The identification and location of all other 104(e) letter response samples are given below: Sample Number e-01 e-02 e-03 e-04 eR-07s eR-08s eC-09s eC-lOs eC-lla eC-12a eC-13a eTT-14 eTT-15 eT-Olw eT-02s eT-02sd eT-03t 648 WB Sample Location O'Henry Cleaners Ramsay Motor Center trip blank field blank Ramsay Motor Center Ramsay Motor Center Consolidated Auto Parts Consolidated Auto Parts Consolidated Auto Parts field blank trip blank Tillet Gardens Tillet Gardens Texaco Service Station (cistern) Texaco Service' Station Texaco Service Station (duplicate) trip blank Water blank Sample Matrix Soil *^ ., Groundwater \s DI water DI water Soil Soil Soil Soil Surface water DI water DI water Soil Soil Water Soil Soil DI water DI water WP12/12 40 React Sum. 10th Floor New Yak, NY 10006 2U39M634 TUT 001 0588 'CDM Federal Programs Corporation Ms. Rwan In the attached table we have taken the liberty to limit tht list of compounds to include benzenes, substituted benzenes, chlorinated hydrocarbons, toluene, xylene and any other organic compounds found above detection liaits. These compounds (BTBC and chlorinated hydrocarbons) were identified as groundwater contaminants in past EPA sampling events conducted in the Tutu Wellfield Area. Should you have any questions regarding these data, please do not hesitate to call me at (212) 393-9634. Sincerely, CDH Federal Programs Corporation Grater III Regional Manager Attachment cc: Joe Claypoole NYC File Document Control WP12/12 ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DUTECitU IN 104(e) LETTER RESPONSE SAMPLES TUTU HELLFIELD AREA, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS COMPOUNDS____________________e-01 e-02 e-03 e-04 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 3J ACETONE 16J CARBON DISULFIDE CHLOROFORM 9 9 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 6 7 DIBROMOCHLCRCMETHANE 9 9J BROMOFORM 9 9 4-METHYL-2-PENTANCNE 2-HEXANCNE TOLUENE XYLENE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE STYRENE 2 BUTANONE TETRACHLOROETHANE 440,000 11 TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE 2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE 2 METHYLHEXANE 2 METHYLBUTANE PENTANONE (A Cn) HEXANE 2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE ACETIC ACID (methyl ester) 1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE 3 METHYLPENTANE 2 ETHYLPENTANE J - Estimated value N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material ( all values reported in UG/KG ) TL|T 001 0590 TABLE 1 (CONTINUED) ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN 104(e) LETTER RESPONSE SAMPLES • /<(/<> TUTU HELLFIELD AREA, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS D.Q'** /• _* ,**& - ' COMPOUNDS____________________eR-07s eR-08s eC-09s eC-lOs METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON pISULTIDE CHLOROFORM 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BROMOPORM 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 8 33J 2-HEXANONE 55 2 560J 1300 1 7 '-a$PO - 5600 6 ^^ 4J 18 -tino 2100 6 2 BUTANONE TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE 70JN 10JN 2 METHOXy 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE 100JN 50JN 2 METHYLHEXANE 2 METHYLBUTANE PENTANQNE (A Cn) HEXANE 2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE ACETIC ACID (methyl ester) 1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE 3 METHYLPENTANE 2 ETHYLPENTANE J - Estimated value N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material ( all values reported in UG/KG ) TUT OOl 0591 TABLE 1 (continued) ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN 104(e) LETTER RESPONSE SAMPLES TUTU WELLFIELD AREA, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS COMPOUNDS____________________eC-lla eC-12af eTT-14 eTT-15 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE 4J CARBON DISULFIDE CHLOROFORM 7 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 6 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 8 BROMOFORM 9 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 2-HEXANONE TOLUENE 10 XYLENE 13 11J BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE 3 STYRENE 2 BUTANONE TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE 20JN 2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE 2 METHYLHEXANE 2 METHYLBUTANE 10JN PENTANONE (A Cn) 10JN HEXANE 6 ON 2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 300JN 200OJN 1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 1000JN 3000JN ACETIC ACID (methyl ester) 30JN 1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE 3 METHYLPENTANE 20JN 2 ETHYLPENTANE J - Estimated value N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material ( all values reported in UG/KG ) T'UT OO1 O592 l (continued) j ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN 104(e) LETTER RESPONSE SAMPLES TUTU WELLTIELD AREA, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS COMPOUNDS___________;__________eT-Olw eT-03t 648 KB METHYLENE CHLORIDE 1J ACETONE 17 5J CARBON DISULFIDE 2J CHLOROFORM 9 8 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 2J BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 6 DIBROMOGHLOftOHETHANE 9 8 BROMOFORM 8 10 4-METRYL-2-PENTANONE 2-HEXANONE TOLUENE XYLENE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE STYRENE 2 BUTANONE TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE 2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE 2 METHYLHEXANE 2 METHYLBUTANE PENTANONE (A Cn) HEXANE ___ 2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETRYLBENZENE 1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE ACETIC ACID (nethyl ester) 1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE 3 METHYLPENTANE 2 ETHYLPENTANE J - Estimated value N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material ( all values reported in UG/KG ) TUT 001 0593 t?6SO TOO 1(1.1 (OiOJL) I saoiow i - AVSWVU. ••'•"'&-&' *'--«}.u5-.'.*- ••:4&3s?i§te ::$SK$g%£? .» ^.v.::.;:.^\':v •,. -- .*f . .u-^r TUT 3)m Tlm9 mzom #•••£ •Of- ' : ••&>•• CLJI Federal Programs Corporation March 31, 1989 Ms. Caroline Rwan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10276 Project: EPA Contract No: 68-01-7331 Document No: T648-C02-LR-DBXF-1 Subject: CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary of the Tutu Texaco Service Station Tank Excavation Tutu Wellfield Area, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands Dear Ms. Rwan, The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the CLP analysis results for the split samples collected during the Tutu Texaco Service Station tank excavation in the Tutu Wellfield Area, St Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands from September 12 through September 15, 1988. in the attached table we have taken the liberty to limit the list of compounds to include benzenes, substituted benzenes, chlorinated hydrocarbons, toluene, xylene and any other organic compounds found above detection limits. These compounds (BTEX and chlorinated hydrocarbons) were identified as groundwater contaminants in past EPA sampling events conducted in the Tutu Wellfield Area. The nomenclature of the samples listed in the above referenced table reflect the sample locations as follows: o Samples with the prefix "EX" were collected from the excavation pit. o Samples with the prefix "TP" were collected from the test holes located at the pit perimeter, o Samples with the prefix "PW were collected from the water pumped from the pit. o Samples with the prefix "SP" were collected from the soil piles. Should you have any questions regarding these data, please do not hesitate to call me at (212) 393-9634. Sincerely, COM Federal Programs Corporation Graberf/ TES III Regional Manager Attachment cc: NYC File Document Control ———————————————~——— TUT (">("> t O597 « Rector Socet, 10th Floor New YoA, NY 10006 212 39W634 ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION TANK EXCAVATION SPLIT SAMPLES, TUTU WELLFIELD AREA, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS COMPOUNDS TP-01 TP-02 TP-03 TFB-011 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE 18000BJ 5J CARBON pISULFIDE CHLOROFORM 13J 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 6 BROHODICHLOROMETHANE DIBROMOCHLQROMETHANE BROMOFORf 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE -2700 2-HEXANONE 14000J TOLUENE 4800 13J XYLENE -45000 22000 BENZENE • 1400 87J ETHYLBENZENE 5000 13000 170J STYRENE 2 BUTANONE 2300J 6J TETRACHLOROETHANE TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE 2 METBOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE 600JN 2 METHYLHEXANE 2000JN 2 METHYLBUTANE PENTANONE (A Cn) HEXANE 2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE ACETIC ACID (methyl ester) 1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE 2 METHYLETHYLBENZENE 6000JN J - Estimated value N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material 1 - denotes field blank 2 - denotes trip blank - denotes duplicate sample ( all values reported in UG/KG ) TUT 001 0598 I TABLE 1 (continued) ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION TANK EXCAVATION SPLIT SAMPLES, TUTU WELLFIELD AREA, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS COMPOUNDS EX-01 EX-02 EX-03 EX-03d3 I METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE I CARBON DISULFIDE CHLOROFORM 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 10 I BROMODICHLOROMETHANE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BROMOFORM 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 6200J 49000J 30000J I 2-HEXANONE 24000J I TOLUENE 14000J "*900 3600 11000 XYLENE 31000J 56000 8100 25000 1 BENZENE 1200J 4600 280J ETHYLBENZENE 16000J 59000 <4000 11000 STYRENE 2 BUTANONE 2600J TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE 2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE 2 METHYLHEXANE 2 METHYLBUTANE PENTANONE (A Cn) HEXANE 2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE ACETIC ACID (methyl ester) 1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE 2 METHYLPENTANE 5000JN J - Estimated value N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material 1 - denotes field blank 2 - denotes trip blank 3 - denotes duplicate sample ( all values reported in UG/KG ) TUT OO.1 0599 TABLE.1 (continued) ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION TANK EXCAVATION SPLIT SAMPLES, TUTU WELLFIELD AREA, ST. TBCMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS COMPOUNDS______________________TFB-021 EX-04 TFB-031 PW-02 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 4J ACETONE 5J 13 CARBON DISULFIDE CHLOROFORM 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE DIBRONOCHLOROKETHANE BROnOFORH 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 2-HEXANONE TOLUENE 280J XYLENE 10 2000B 2J BENZENE 24J ETHYLBENZENE 34B 1400 STYRENE 2 BUTANONE TETRACHLOROETHANE TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE 2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE 2 METHYLHEXANE 2 METHYLBUTANE PENTANONE (A On) HEXANE 2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE ACETIC ACID (methyl ester) 1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE 2 METHYLPENTANE J - Estimated value N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material 1 - denotes field blank - denotes trip blank - denotes duplicate sample ( all values reported in UG/KG ) UT °°i 0600 I 5 I I I I I I TABU 1 (continued) ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION TANK EXCAVATION SPLIT SAMPLES, TUTU WELLFIELD AREA, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS COMPOUNDS SP-1T SP-2T SP-3T SP-3DT3 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE CHLOROFORM 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE DIBRCMOCHLOROMETHANE BROMOFORM 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 2-HEXANONE 17000J 7000 TOLUENE 670J XYLENE 720J 720J 5600 1900 BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE -*90 '920 . 3200 1400 STYRENE 2 BUTANONE TETRACHLOROETHANE TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE 2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANCNE 2 METHYLHEXANE 2 METHYLBUTANE PENTANONE (A On) HEXANE 2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE ACETIC ACID (methyl ester) 1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE 2 METHYLPENTANE J - Estimated value N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material - denotes field blank - denotes trip blank - denotes duplicate sample ( all values reported in UG/KG ) TUT 00.1 0601 (continued) ORGANIC CONFOUNDS DETECTED IN TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION TANK EXCAVATION SPLIT SAMPLES, TUTU WELLFIELD AREA, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS CONFOUNDS_______________________SP-2M SP-3DK3 SP-4T2 SP-FB-59* METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE 4500J 12 CARBON DISULFIDE CHLOROFORM 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 2 J BROKODICHLOROHETHANE DIBRONOCHLOROHETHANE BRONOFORM 4-HETHYL-2-PENTANONE 2-HEXANONE 7900J 12000J TOLUENE 520J 280J 240J XYLENE 1700 1300 1900 BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE 1400 1700 M300 STYRENE 2 BUTANONE TETRACHLOROETHANE TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED CONFOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE 2 NETHQXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE 2 METHYLHEXANE 2 METHYLBUTANE PENTANONE (A Cn) HEXANE 2 ETHYL-1,3 DINETHYLBENZENE 1 ETHYL-2,3 DINETHYLBENZENE ACETIC ACID (methyl ester) 4000JN 1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE 2 HETHYLPENTANE J - Estimated value N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material 1 - denotes field blank 2 - denotes trip blank 3 - denotes duplicate sample ( all values reported in UG/KG ) TUT urn 0602 I I I I I TABLE 1 (continued) ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION TANK EXCAVATION SPLIT SAMPLES, TUTU WELLFIELD AREA, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS COMPOUNDS_______________________SP-T-602 SP-T-61* 648-MB METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE 10 26J 5J CARBON DISULFIDE CHLOROFORM ___ 8 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 2J BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 6 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 6 BROMOPORM 10 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 2-HEXANONE TOLUENE XYLENE ETHYLBENZENE STYRENE 2 BUTANONE TETRACHLOROETHANE TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE 2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE 2 METHYLHEXANE 2 METHYLBUTANE PENTANONE (A Cn) HEXANE 2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE ACETIC ACID (nethy1 ester) 1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE 2 METHYLPENTANE J - Estimated value N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material - denotes field blank 2 - denotes trip blank - denotes duplicate sample ( all values reported in UG/KG ) (water blank) TUT 1/090 TOO mi I J J ~] 1 I .11 'ON 30N3d3d3b 1 I I I I I I COM Federal Programs Corporation February 2, 1990 Ms. Caroline Kvan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 26 Federal Plaza Nev York, Nev York 10278 Project: EPA Contract No:68-V9-0002 Document No: TES V - C02048 - LR - BHVG Subject: Work Assignment C02048 CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary of Oils from the Tutu Texaco Station, Tutu Esso Station, Ramsay Motor Center, and Consolidated Auto Parts, Tutu Vellfield Area, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands Dear Ms. Kvan, The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the CLP analysis results for volatile organic compounds in 12 oils collected on July 8, 1989, during the resampling of 104(e) sites in the Tutu Vellfield Area, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. Table 1 lists the compounds found above detection limits, including benzenes, substituted benzenes, chlorinated hydrocarbons, toluene, xylene and other organic compounds. However, detection limits for a given compound are not constant, but increase vith increasing cample dilution. Some of the analyzed samples were heavily diluted; they nay contain undetected compounds that would have been discovered at a lover dilution factor vhere their detection limits would have been lover. To show you which samples may contain undetected compounds, a list of sample dilution factors used for each sample and detection limits for all analyzed compounds at those dilutions is included as Table 2. The prefixes of the samples listed reflect the sample locations as follows: o eR - Ramsay Motor Center o eT - Tutu Texaco Station o eC - Consolidated Auto Parts o eE - Tutu Esso Station Volatile holding times are often used for litigation support. They are set primarily to minimize compound losses due to volatization and biodegradation. These processes generally result in reduction of the compound concentration. Thus, although holding times were exceeded in all cases, causing the values to be qualified as estimates (J), these numbers can be conservatively regarded as minimum values. -1- o .IOth Floor New Yo*. NY W006 2I2S9W634 riJT w± 0605 CDM Fedenl Programs Corporation Tvo samples, eT-02-03a and eC-Q2-01a, vere mistakenly analyzed as vater by the lab. Consequently, almost all data from these Maples vere rejected (R). All values for tentatively identified compounds are qualified vith the letter N (presumptive evidence of the presence of the Mterial). This merely reflects the fact that the compound identification vas tentative. The analyses show detectable levels of chlorinated hydrocarbons in sample eT-02-6af collected from the Tutu Texaco station and in eE-02-Ola, -02a, and -03a, from the Tutu Esso station. Should you have any questions regarding these data, please do not hesitate to call me or Sally Odland at (212) 393-9634. Sincerely, COM federal Programs Corporation Scott Grat TES V Regional Manager TUT OO1 O606 s I I I I TABLE 1 ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN OILS SECOND ROUND OF 104(E) SAMPLING ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS (ug/k«) COMPOUNDS_______________eR-02-Ola____eT-02-Ola_____«T-02-02a METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE 2-HEXANONE 180,000 J TOLUENE 450,000 J 340,000 J 76,000 J XYLENE 1,200,000 J 1,600,000 J 190,000 J BENZENE 64,000 J 7,000 J ETHYLBENZENE 130,000 J 190,000 J 35,000 J TETRACHLOROETHENE 1,1,1-TRICHLORETHANE TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE 120,000 JN l-ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 1,2,4 TRIMETHYLBENZENE 2-METHYLBUTANE 68,000 JN 2,3-DIMETHYLBUTANE 23,000 JN 3-METHYLPENTANE METHYL-CYCLOPENTANE - 37,000 JN HEXANE (DOT) 3-METHYLHEXANE 2-METHOX7-2-METBYLPROPANE J- estimated value N- presumptive evidence of the presence of the material -3- erfi, ' IUT OO1 0607 TABLE 1 (Continued) ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN OILS SECOND ROUND OF 104(E) SAMPLING ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS COMPOUNDS METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE 2-HEXANONE TOLUENE XYLENE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TETRACHLOROETHENE 1,1, 1-TR1CHLORETHANE (ug/kg) eT-02-03a* 2,400 J 300 J , eT-02-04a 59,000 J 490,000 J 900,000 J 46,000 J 140,000 J eT-02-05a 130,000 J 330,000 J 11,000 J 49,000 J TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE l-ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYL-BENZENE 1,2,3-TRIHETHYLBENZENE 1,2,4 TRIMETHYLBENZENE 2-METHYLBUTANE 2,3-DIMETHYLBUTANE 3-METHYLPENTANE METHYL-CYCLOPENTANE HEXANE (DOT) 3-METHYLHEXANE 2-METHOXY-2-METHYLPROPANE 57,000 JN 33,000 JN 31,000 JN 6,600 JN 8,000 JN J- estimated value N- presumptive evidence of the presence of the material *Sample mistakenly analyzed as vater. All other values are flagged as "R" (rejected). -4- TUT 001 06O3 I I TABLE 1 (Continued) ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN OILS SECOND ROUND OF 104(E) SAMPLING ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS COMPOUNDS METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE 2-HEXANONE TOLUENE XYLENE BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TETRACHLOROETHENE 1,1, 1-TRICHLORETHANE (ug/kg) eT-02-06a 110,000 J 88,000 J 4,000 J 61,000 J 3,900 J eT-02-07a 3,800 J 24,000 J 120,000 J 13,000 J eC-02-Ola* 13 J TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE l-ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 5,400 JN 1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 55,000 JN 1,2,4 TRIMETHYLBENZENE 2-METHYLBUTANE 2,3-DIMETHYLBUTANE 3-METHYLPENTANE METHYL-CYCLOPENTANE HEXANE (DOT) 3-METHYLHEXANE 2-METHOXY-2-METHYLPROPANE J- estinated value N- presumptive evidence of the presence of the material -5- ^ 0Q •UT OOl 0609 I TABLE 1 (Continued) ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN OILS SECOND ROUND OF 104(E) SAMPLING ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS (ug/kg) . COMPOUNDS_______________eE-02-Ola____«E-02-02a____eE-02-03a METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE 2-HEXANONE TOLUENE 91,000 J 57,000 J 92,000 J XYLENE 28,000 J 150,000 J 230,000 J BENZENE 12,000 J ETHYLBENZENE 32,000 J 19,000 J TETRACHLOROETHENE 30,000 J 63,000 J 91,000 J 1,1,1-TRICHLORETHANE 25,000 J 42,000 J TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS ' PROPYLBENZENE 1-ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE I 1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 140,000 JN ' 1,2,4 TRIMETHYLBENZENE 16,000 JN 2-METHYLBUTANE > 2,3-DIMETHYLBUTANE 3-METHYLPENTANE 7,900 JN METHYL-CYCLOPENTANE HEXANE (DOT) 3-METHYLHEXANE 2-METHOXY-2-METHYLPROPANE 25,000 JN J- estimated value N- presumptive evidence of the presence of the material * Sample mistakenly analyzed as vater. All other values are flagged as "R" (rejected). -6- f TUT 001 O610 TABLE 1 (Continued) ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN OILS SECOND ROUND OF 104(E) SAMPLING ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS (ug/k£) COMPOUNDS eE-02-03a METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE 2-HEXANONE TOLUENE 92,000 J XYLENE 230,000 J BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TETRACHLOROETHENE 91,000 J 1,1,1-TRICHLORETHANE TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS PROPYLBENZENE 1-ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 1,2,4 TRIMETHYLBENZENE 2-METHYLBUTANE 2,3-DIMETHYLBUTANE 3-METHYLPENTANE METHYL-CYCLOPENTANE HEXANE 3-METHYLHEXANE 2-METHOXY-2-METHYLPROPANE J- estimated value N- presumptive evidence of the presence of the material -7- IT IT 001 0611 TABLE 2 DETECTION LIMITS FOR VARIOUS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AT DIFFERENT DILUTION LEVELS Sanple dilutions were as follows: Sample eR-02-Ola eT-02-Ola «T-02-02a eT-02-04a eT-02-05a Dilution 55x 50x lOx 40x 20x Sample eT-02-06a eT-02-07a eE-02-Ola eE-02-02a eE-02-03a Dilution TSx lOx lOx lOx 200x Samples eT-02-03a and eC-02-Ola vere mistakenly analyzed as vaters. Results were rejected. Dilution rates are irrelevant. Detection limits for the analyzed VOCs at the relevant dilutions fall into three groups: Dilution Factor (UC/KG) Compounds 200x 50x 40x 20x lOx Group i 17300,000 US,ooo 555,000 155,000 6"57ooo Group 2 250,000 63,000 50,000 25,000 13,000 Group 3 130,000 31,000 25,000 13,000 6,300 Group 1 Compounds trans -1,3-Dichloropropene Group 2 Compounds Chloromethane, Bromomethane, Vinyl Chloride, Chloroethane, Acetone, 2-Butanone, Vinyl Acetate, 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone, 2-Hexanone Group 3 Compounds Group 3 Compo Hethylene Chl lylene Chloride, Carbon Disulfide, 1,1-Dichloroethene, 1.1-Dichloroethane, 1,2-Dichloroethene (total), Chloroform, 1.2-Dichloroethane, 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, Carbon Tetrachloride, Bromodichloromenthane, 1,2-Dichloropropane, cis-1,3-Dichloropropene, Trichloroethene, Dibromochloromethane, 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, Benzene, Bromoform, Tetrachloroethene, 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane, Toluene, Chlorobenzene, Ethylbenzene, Styrene, Total Xylenes. -8- TUT 001 O6.i: MEMORANDUM TO: Docuaent Control FROM: Margo Rosato i SUBJECTS Validated Data DATE: January 3, 1990 DCN: TES5-C02001-DV-BLVN »«««K«n»«im«iii>«ai>«««> Enclosed please find sites: SITE Rosen North Sea Tutu Mannheia t»*mmmmmmmmm tvo copies CASE MO. 39001 10925 10925 42081 42081 10851 12163 12163 12057 12057 4512B 12684 4835B •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••a of validated data for the following ANALYSIS Set 41 Organic Inorganic Organic Set 5 Inorganic Set 6 Inorganic Organic Organic Organic Inorganic Organic Organic Inorganic Organic Please fill each case accordingly. Should you have any questions r please do not hesitate to call ae. / • MR/md Enclosure CC: P. Billis S. Graber J. Litwin I ' ^ (TV16/62) I T of 90 TUT 001 06131 RECORD OF COMMUNICATION TOT George Karraa QPNONICAU. QOWCUMION QCONMHINCS Ronald W. Scarka 09/19/89 0930 _______CLP Organic Data Packages For Quality Aaaurance Review •AHT OF COMMUNICATION ~~————"~~~~~——————————————————— SITE The Following CLP Organic Data are being aent to MMB for review CASE */ LABORATORY ANALYSIS/ NUMBER OF BLANK DUPLICATE SAS I MATRIX SAMPLES NUMBER(S) NUMBER(S Industrial Latex 12610 R3/RI/FS Compuchem Organic Water 06 Soil 08 BAR-20(TB) BAR-18(FB) BAR-2KRB) BAR-19(FB) BAR-14(FB) NONE TUTU Super Cat 4512B TES III Denhard Property 12630 CDH/R1/FS Veraar Organic Water 07 Soil 05 Cursio COH/TesV 12434 Coapuchea Organic Hater 02 BAW-05(TB) BAW-OS(RB) BY-901 BY-903 BAU12 BAU11 None .USIONS. ACTION TAKIM O« INPOAMATtON CQHU TO: V - File and Data Package TUT 001 O61'1 <7.7J) MM* MMI UWTIL APPENDIX A.0 REJECTION SUMMARY FORM (No. of Cqnpoiinds/No. of Fractions (Samples) Type of Review; "To lVl______:__________ D»te:. Project; /^A/if J o £*£><=> ^ m in Owe *: Lab Nme: Reviewer's Initials: /? (2x Number of Samples:= /3 Analytes Rejected Due to Exceeding Review Criteria; Acids (15) B/H (SO) Surrogates Holding Time Calibration Contamination ID Other *- Total ft Samph Total » Rejected/ Total 0 in all Samples TOA 0 o /Lf 79 PEST (20) n PCB (7) TCDD (1) Analytes EstUnated Due to Encecding Review Criteria for; Acids (15) B/N (50) VOA O o o o o PEST (20) PCB (7) TCDO (1) oi\ -TO \ J ATTACHMENT 1 SOP NO. IV-6 TOTAL IBYIEV CLP DATA Functional Guideline* for Evaluating Orfanic Analysis Cue Ho. 4512B SDC Ho. i LABORATORY VERSAR SITE TUTU/SUPERCAT DATA ASSESSMENTS The current functional guidelines (1988) for evaluating organic data hare applied. All data are valid and acceptable except thoae analytea which qualified with a M" (e»tinated)t *U* ( non-detects), 1" (unusable), or "JN* (presumptive evidence for the presence of the Material at an estimated value). All action is detailed on the attached sheets. Two facts should be noted by all data users. First, the ••• flag asens that the associated value is unusable. In other vords, due to significant QC problens the analysis is invalid and provides no information as to whether the coapound is present or not. *1" values should not appearon data tables because they cannot be relied-upon, even as a last resort. The second fact to keep ia Bind is that no coapound concentration, even if it has passed all QC tests, is guaranteed to be accurate. Strict QC serves to increase confidence in data but any value potentially contains error. TtSe! *K Date /I / V/19 ffi Verified Byt fctaafch_________________Date Ig. / *f /19 !_•) TUT OOi 0616 ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 2 OP 9 SOP NO. lff-6 DATA ASSESSMENT! 1. BOLDING TIME: The anount of an analyte in a aanple can change vith tine due to rhenlrsl instability, degradation, volatilisation, etc. If the specified holding tine is exceeded, the data nay not 'be valid. Those analytea detected in the nannies vhose holding tine has been exceeded vill be qualified aa estiaated, M". The non-detects (aanple quantitation liaits) vill be flagged as estiaated, "J"v or unusable, "1", if the holding tines are grossly The following action vas taken in the sanples and analytea due to excessive holding tine. All coapounds vere qualified J in saaples 4512B-41, 42, 43, 44, - 46, 47, 48, 49, - 51, 52 and 53 due to excessive holding tiaes. The non-detects in these sanples vere not rejected since volatilisation, biodegradation, etc.^are inhibited in an oil natrix. The nediun level analysis raised the detection Units and the data user Bust understand that the "J" flag indicates detection liaits nay be higher. The 3 were. <^A\;^^ 4+ 4«»enb«J 1*1 ******* 001 0617 ATTACHMBfT 1 pAfig 3 OP 9 SOP HO. Hi-6 DATA ASSESSMENTS 2. BLANK OONTAimiATIOXt totality assurance (QA) blanks, i.e., aethod, trip, field, rinse and vater bleaks are prepared to identify any contaaination vhich aay have been introduced into the saaples during saaple preparation or field activity. Method blanks aessmri laboratory contaaination. Trip blanks aeasure rross tontealnation of saaples during shipment. Pield blanks aeasure cross-contealnation of saaples during field operations. If the concentration of the aaalyte is leas than 5 tiaes the blank contaminant level (10 times for the common contaainants), the analytes la the samples shovn vere qualified vith IP for these A) Method blank contaaination Nethylene chloride and acetone vere flagged U in saaple (Dilution factor for aediua level analysis and 200 fold dilution vere taken into account). The laboratory analysed aetbod blanks (VBLJU1, VBLK95 and VBLK29) as lov level vaters vhen they should have been analyzed as aedlua level soils. B) Pield or rinse blank contaaination (•vater blanks* or "distilled vater blanks" are validated like any other saaple) C) Trip blank contaaination r „ TUT °°i 0618 \ °10 ATTACHMENT 1 SOP MO. IV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT! 4. CALIBRATIONS Satisfactory instrument calibration la established to ensure that the instrument is capable of producing acceptable quantitative data. An initial calibration denonstrates that the instrument is capable of firing acceptable performance at the beginning of an experiaental sequence. The continuing calibration checks document that the Instrument is giving satisfactory daily performance. A) RESPONSE FACTORS The response factor measures the instrument's response to specific chemical compounds. The response factor for the Target Compound List (TO.) must be > 0.05 in both the initial and continuing calibrations. A value < 0.05 indicates a serious detection and quant1tatIon problem (poor sensitivity). Analytes detected in the sample vill be qualified as estimated, *J*. : All non-detects for that compound vill be rejected, "1". ^ ^. 2-Butanone vas rejected in samples 4312B- 42, 43, 44, 45, 48, 49, 50, 51 and 52 because the calibration response factor vas belov 0.05. AM uuitft In «***U.* jriX-a-**" **J *° **»«• W«n 10. 001 061? ATTACHMENT 1 SOP NO. EV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 5. CALIBRATIONS A) PERCENT RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION (ZRSD) AND PERCENT DIFFERENCE (XD)t Percent RSD ia calculated fro* the initial calibration and la uaad to indicate the alability of the apecific conpound response factor over increasiaf concentration. Percent D conpares the response factor of the continuing; calibration check to the nean response factor (ERF) fron the initial calibration. Percent D ia a aeasnre of the instrument's daily performance. Percent RSD mist be OOZ and ZD must be <25Z. A valve outside of these llnits indicates potential detection and quantitation errors. For these reasons, all positive results are flagged as estimated, *J" and non-detects are flagged *OJ" (if ZD or RSD >50X). If there la a groas deviation of ZRSD and XD, the non-detects nay be rejected, *R". For the PCB/PEST1C1UK fraction, ZRSD for aldrln, endrin, DOT, and dibutylchlorendate must not exceed 10Z. Percent D must be vithia 1SX on the quantitation column and 20Z on the confirmation column. Acetone did not meet continuing calibration QC criteria in samples 4512B-41 *4-*(<S- but vas qualified as estimated previously, due to holding tine exceedancej t*d *4nu- •& *» d«+6*«'W«i i* »*6*i»n 40. TUT OO1 06; ATTACHMENT 1 SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 6. SURROGATES: All saaplas ara spiked vlth surrogate compounds prior to saapla praparatioo to evaluate overall laboratory perforaance and efficiency of the analytical technique. If the Measured surrogate concentrations vare outside contract •pecificationst qualifications were appliad to the saaples and analytes as shown below. Surrogate recovery was high in sanple 4S12B-48. Data was previously qualified as estimated due to holding tine exceedance and further qualification is not required. ' \ \ - I TUT 001 0621 n <? ATTACHMENT 1 PACE 7 OF 9 SOP MO. RV-6 DATA ASSESSMENTS 8. COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION: A) VOLATILE AND SEMI-VOLATILE FRACTIONS: TCL compounds are identified on the OC/NS by using the analyte's relative retention time (BET) and by comparison to the ion spectra obtained from known standards. Por the results to be a positive hit, the sample peak must be within +0.06 BET units of the standard compound and have an ion spectrum which has a ratio of the primary and secondary m/e intensities within 20Z of that in the standard compound. Por the tentatively identified compounds (TIC) the ion spectra must match accurately. In the cases in which there is not and adequate ion spectrum ^match, the laboratory may have provided false positive identification. B) PESTICIDE FRACTION: The retention times of reported compounds most fall within the calculated retention time windows for the two chromatographic columns and a OC/MS confirmation is required if the concentration exceeds 10 ng/ml in the final sample extract. ^ctal Mylenet to—•laplet 4512B ^5 48, 49 and M «as qualified Four TIC's in sample 4512B-41, and 51, two TIC's in sample 4512B-46, three TIC's in saaple 4512B-47, one TIC in samples 4512-48 and 49 vere flagged JN. *A11 TIC compound results (VOA and ERA) are flagged "J" (estimated), and also "IP (presumptive evidence of the presence of the compound) if an identification is made, to reflect the qualitative and quantitative error inherent in the analysis of compounds without corresponding calibration TUT 001 0622 ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 8 OP 9 SOP MO. HV-6 DATA ASSESSMENT: 9. MATRIX SPIKE/SPIKE DUPLICATE, MS/USD: The MS/MSD data are generated to determine the long-ten preciaioo and accuracy of the analytical Method in various aatrice*. The MS/MSD Bay be uaed in conjunction vith other QC criteria for sea* additional qualification of the data. Toluene recovery in 4512B-49 MSD vas high, data was qualified *J" due to holding tine exceedance, further qualification is not required. The lab analyzed tvo oil staples as lov level vaters but did not perfora lov level MS/MSO analysis. Staples vee actually oils and a aediua level oil MS/MSD vas analysed. Data has been fejetffet- due to •&k\ts~-QC,- csi4*.ri&*-. and further qualification due to the lack of a lov level MS/MSD is not required. **'« +****•* TUT 001 O {-.? ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 9 OP 9 SOP NO. HV-6 DATA ASSBSSNERTt 10. OTHER OC DATA OUT OP SPBCIPICATXOMs The laboratory incorrectly labeled Maples vith SASff 4685B when the SAS packing liata clearly indicates the sample numbers befin vith 4512B. Reviewer corrected (see phone lof). The laboratory Incorrectly identified the matrix for samples 4512B- 45 and 50 as water and analysed As ***** (.K&.^htnt loqfi-*"1tittc n*t hw teen o m t f l a> 7b»i4we 11. STSTBM PERFORMANCE AMD OVERALL ASSESSMENT (continued on next page if necessary)s 12. CONTRACT PROBLEMS / MOM-COMPLIAMCEs . Lab did not provide fora VI for initial Calibration performed on 7/12/89 and 8/19/89. .Lab did not provide Porn VII for continuinff calibration performed on 7/19/89 at 9i51 and 23:25, 7/20/89, 8/19/89, 8/21/89 and 8/23/89. Hovtver, the lab did provide the rav data for the above calibrations. 13. This package contains re-extraction, re-analysis or dilution. Upon reviewing the OA results, the following fora I(s) are identified to he TUT 001 0624 DPO: IJ ACTION [J FYI CASE NO. SOW Refioo. T\ATA stnniA LABORATORY DATA USER _ REVIEW COMPLETION DATE )3 OTHER (<?» U) NO. OF SAMPLES ____ WATER ____ SOIL REVIEWER HESD I ] ESAT It^OTHER, CONTRACT/CONTRACTOR L HOLDING TIMES Z OC-MS TUNE/ OC FERFORMANCE A INITIAL CALIBRATIONS 4. CONTINUING CALIBRATIONS 5. FIELD BLANKS fF - aot applicable) 6. LABORATORY BLANKS 7. SURROGATES S. MATRIX SPIKE/DUPLICATES 9. REGIONAL QC ("P - ,aot appUeable) ALf^<d. *•« f**J*fy ****** BNA M/> 11. COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION 12. COMPOUND QUANTITATION U. SYSTEM FERFORMANCE 14. OVERALL ASSESSMENT O • No problems or a^nor problems that do sot affect data waMttiy. X • No more tfeaa about 5% of the dau poiats are qualified as either animated or M * More ibaa tbout 5% of the data poiats art qoaUfied af animated. Z » More taaa fbotu 5% of the data poiats art foalifled as ntsable. DFO ACTION ITEMS: AREAS OF CONCERN: TUT 001 062; In Reference to Case NO(I)I Contract Laboratory Program REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM Telephone Record Log Date of Call: Laboratory Name: Lab Contact: Region: Regional Contact: Call Initiated By: ++***+ Laboratory /Reei Region In reference TO data for the following sample numberis): Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed: ' G) G) Summary of Resolution: (L H u Sinature £/ Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy Oate TUT' 001 0626 In Reference to Case No(s)x Contract Laboratory Program REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM Date of Call: Laboratory Name: Lab Contact: Region: Regional Contact: Telephone Record Log I I/A 7 C7o 3) Call Initiated By: __ Laboratory __jX"Region In reference to data for the following sample numbeKs): Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed: ' vo A - G-<rvltj\,Yw/ fa^Jfr^^JL Vtf Summary of Resolution: Signature Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy TUT O01 0627 I HEHOIANDUH Tot Rhenda Carter Fro*i Linda I. look OC/Hf Data Quality Manager Da4-.*! Moveaber 2ft, 1M9 Tour call to Charlie Carter regarding tAB 4B12B For BAB 45121, there vaa one eet of QC perfcreed for the oil aaaplea. There were no water eaaplee in thie SAB. For the oaleulationo of CRfiLe, tho level of aediua autoaatieally iapiioo that a 129 dilution factor waa uoed. Any further dilution appear• aa the dilution factor on the For* ZA. For exaople, eaaple 4«SeB41, page 19M29 ia a aediua level ooil with a dilution factor of M. Thia would »aan that the total dilution performed on thie aaaple ia 125 tiaee So, or §29o, vhleh would then be vultipliee by th« CftOL. Bounding would bring tha value to two oignifioant figure*. Aa for the BAB nuabera, the »aoking Liot (page IBMtft) haa both 4B12B end 445*1. Binoe 4*BBB appeared on the VOA bottlee, thia waa the nuaber uaed by the aaalyoto for their data* •leaae oontaet ae at <7o3>73t-3Mo out 74B if you require further aaaiatanoa. U OO1 I I ••»—— -i i i o .jo. u-A il J! o 3 •3 5 c -S~ i-J—1-2 --I-- <! _ O ir SOP NO. H»-6 Revision f6 OP CRSMfZGS DAT* REVIEW AND fSEUKDAKY REVIEW GONCURRED BY: APPROVED BY: TUT 001 0630 J Of 36 Data: March 1989 Revision 6 CCKPXEHNESS AND CEUVERABIfS CASE MEMBER: *-/ S~ I IAB:___ SHE; "72* l.o Data Qeml^t^n^s and Delivgrablas YIS NO N/A 1.1 Hava any missing deliverable* baan received and addad to the data package. ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resutoittal of any sd*sing deliverable*. If lab cannot provide then, note the effect on review of the package under the "Contract Problew/Non-ceapliance" eection of reviewer narrative. 1.2 Was sn CCS checklist included with package? "• o rnu&r j^tti*r/Case Narrative 2.1 Is the Narrative or Cover Letter present? f t/\ m _ _ _ 2.2 Are Case Nunber and/or SAS nunber contained in the / Narrative or Cover Latter? t (A __ __ 3.0 Data Validation Checklist Ihe following checklist is divided into three parts. Part A is filled out if the data package contains any VQK. analyses, Part B for any ENA analyses and Fart C for Pasticida/PCBa. this package contain: VGA data? BNAdata? Pasticide/PCB data? ACTION: Cooplete corresponding parts of checklist. 063.1 SIANLKRD OPERATING FRDOEURt * Of 35 Data: March 1989 Revision 6 EftRT A: VGA AN&LVSES YES HO M/A 1.3 Are the Traffic Report Tarn* present for all samples? ACTION: If no, contact lab for raplacaosnt of nissing or illegible capias. 1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or lab Narrative Indicata any problens with sanpla receipt, condition of fT^r*. analytical problem or special notations affecting the quality of the data? ACnCN: Use professional judgement to evaluate the affect on the quality of the data. ACTION: If any sanple analyzed as a soil contains son than 50* water, all data should be rejected. Acru.v if both VQA vials for a sanpla have air bubblas, flag all positive results "J" and all non -detects "R". 2.C Holding Tures 2.1 Have any VGA holding tiaes, detamined fron data of collection to data of analysis, bean If unprasarvad, aqueous aromatic volatilas' aust ba analyzed within 7 days of collection and non-aroastic volatilas Bust ba analyzed within 14 days. If preserved with hydrochloric acid and stored at 4*C, than both aroaatic and IMII aiisnl li volatilas aust ba analyzed within 14 days. If uncertain about piasarvation, contact the sanplar to detaxaine whethaz •the saaplas A tan-day holding tine for soil sanples is (Sea Traffic Report) Data Data lab Sanpla Matrix Preserved ? Saapled Received Analyzed l/iljh H fa ACriCN: If holding tins are axoeedert, nag an positive results as astiBvtad ("J") and aanpla quantitation limits as , and docuusait in the narrative that holding TUT 001 O63 *iMn 1 1 1 % ••V f I 1s •v ' W- J «mm* •^mmm 1 ' 1 I^MHMl t MM 1 » •••••• HHMMkt ••••» ^K M^MW ^£^^^V< J^ ^^^^V ^/ ^^•^•r ^^^ff. ^ ^ ^T ^ ^ * ; £ t ? ^ ^ Q a ^ * " ^ ^ 1 ( S a w S » » » 5 S ! ,» i ^ ^ S O ^ ^ ^ - ^ ^ i : i 1 ' I ! ? ^ J ir 7" ^ It ——————— - ——————————————— £- ^ ; ," , ; ° 1 I 1 1 ' • : ^ i I ' : > $ d ^ < —— 1 ——————— ——— ' ——————— ' ——————— Z) i IS r«K t. ; ^ , ^xx^ ' \*\ p* ^^ i -° i j ' ' ; i • , 1 : i 1 : . ! i i <. « , ! o ^ M <^ 'f ? STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 5 of 36 Data: March 1989 Revision 6 NO If analyaas were dona sore than 14 days bayond holding tin, aithar on tha first analysis or upon reanalysis, tha reviewer aust usa profassional judganant to datarnina tha raliability of tha data and tha af facts of additional storage on tha saaple result*. The reviewer nay determine that nan-detect data ara unusable ("R") . 3.0 ftnrpnflta P^^"yerv_ fPonn 3.1 Ara tha VGA Surrogate nacovaiy Sunnaries (Form ZZ) for each of the following aatrioas: a. low Water Lj^J __ __ b. Nad Water [ __ ] c. leu Soil [ __ , d. Mad Soil r -/\ 3.2 Are all the VQ& samples listed on the appropriate Surrogate Recovery Stannaries for each of tha following aatrioas: a. Low Water b. Med Water [ __ ] c. IflwSoil L. . d. Nad Soil f \/l ACIZCN: Can lab for explanation / rasubmittals. If missing dalivarablas ara unavailable, rtunsjaiii af f act on data under "Conclusions* section of reviewer narrative. 3.3 Were outliers Barked correctly with an astarisk? ACTION: Circle all outliers in red. 3.4 Mas one or sore Wk surrogate recovery outside of contract / if ications for any sanple or sethod blank? ts [__] _ If yes, ware sanples reanalyzed? (__] ts _ Naze •ethod blanks reanalyzed? I__) ^X _ ACTION: If surrogate recoveries are > 10% but all do not SOW specifications: 1. Flag all positive results as estiaatad ("J") 2. Flag all nan-detects as estiaatad detection limits ("ID"). TUT O01 0634 of SINOWD OPERATING HVXHJURE Page: 6 Of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES ND If any surrogate has a recovery of <10\ : 1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J"). 2. Flag all nan-detects as unusable <"R"). Professional judgement should be used to qualify data that have method blank surrogate recoveries out of specification in both original and re- analyses. Check the internal standard areas. 3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw ./ data and Form EC? _ { _ 1 If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resutmittal , make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". 4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Forn (Forn III) / _^LJ _ _ 4.2 Mere matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency for each of the following matrices: , a. Low Water (ta^ a/wi^ae*/ 2 til ^—^ — — b. MBd water c. low soil d. Med Soil : If any matrix spike data are missing, take the action specified in 3.2 above. 4.3 How many \Ot spike recoveries are outside QC limits? out of 10 / out of 10 4.4 How many RTO's for Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits? out of 5 -5 out of 5 If MS and MSD both have less than 10% re- covery for an analyte, negative results for that analyte should be rejected, and positive results should be flagged "J". One above applies only to the sample used for the MS/MS) analysis. Use professional ,T .; judgement in applying this criterion to other I SIANEARD CHEATING PROCEZURE Page: 7 of 36 * Date: March 1989 Revision 6 I ————————————————————. — _ _ _ 5.0 Blanks (Form IV) I 5.1 Is the Method Blank Sunmary (Form IV) present? [ iXl _ 1 5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of VGA TCL confounds, has a reagent/method blank been analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples of similar matrix (low water, mad water, low soil, s I medium soil), whichever is more frequent? U»*»«*«r t tA _ _ • IA k ,*A+sri.Lf,. &&II«UM.SJ bijjilLc ML .....J*^ i»<J-«&l »f- uUiJ . IftU | 5.3 Has a VIA instrument blank been analyzed at least **"» **" ••' "**£"*- *** I once every twelve hours for each GC/MS system used? [ l/\ .._. _ ACTltfc. If any method blank data are missing, call lab I for explanation / resutmittal. If not available, reject all associated positive data ("R"). i. 4 Chranatography: review the blank raw data - chrcmatograms I , (RIC.<;), quant reports or data system printouts and spectra. js iJve chrcmatographic performance (baseline stability) / I for each instrument acceptable for VCAs? [ t/\ _ _ Use professional judgement to determine the • effect on the data. 6.0 finrrt-*pfnation I NDIE: "Hater blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are validated like any other sample and are DQK used to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the • other QC blanks discussed below. 6.1 Do any imtthod/instjunent/reagent blanks have positive results (TCL and/or TIC) for VCAs? ftien applied as I described below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution / Factor. ' " */ [ _ J _ 6.2 Do any field/trip/rinse blanks have positive VCA results (TCL and/or TIC)? _ [ _ ] JOICM: Prepare a list of the samples associated with each of the contaminated blanks. (Attach a separate sheet. ) ' NOTE: only field/rinse blanks taken the same day as the samples are used to qualify data. Trip blanks are used to qualify only those samples with which they were shipped. Blanks may not be qualified because of contamination in another blank. Blanks may be qualified for surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems. ruT CtSAHlcS •LANK CCNTAMIMATIONS CASE: SITES FIACTICN: IHETHCD BLANC KNTAHIHATIONS I1NSE SLANIC CCUT. •lANC CONT. | 001 STANDARD OPERATING FHXELUKL rtge: 8 of 36 Data: March 1989 Revision 6 NO N/A ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to Qualify TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest value from all tha associated blanks. jSatple oonc > CRQLjSanple oonc < CRQL tjSanple oonc > CRQL but < lOx blank is < lOx blank value | value 6 >10x blank value Methylene chloride Flag sanple result Acetone with a 'U'; cross Toluene out 'B' flag ____2-butanone ' •_i. Reject aample result No Qualification and report CRQL; jis naartad cross out 'B' flag Other Oontaminants Sanple oonc > C8QL but < Sx blank Flag sanple result with a 'U1; cross out 'B1 flag Sanple oonc < CRQL ({Sanple oonc > CRQL is < Sx blank vmlue value ft > 5 blank value Reject aample result]No qualification and report CRQL; is needed cross out 'B' flag ACTION: For TIC confounds, if the concentration in the sample is less than five times the concentration in the nosl taminated associated blank, flag the sanple data "R" (unusable). 6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipmant blanks associated with every ACTION: For low leva! sasples, note in data asaaaaasnt that there is no associated f ield/rinse/equipBsnt blank. Beception: sanples taken fron a drinking water tap do not have associated field blanks. 7.0 7.1 Are the OC/M5 Tuning and Mass calibration Foras (Form V) for BroBofluorobancana (BFB)? 7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge (K/Z) listing for the BFB provided for each twelve / hour shift? f i/l 7.3 Has a tuning performance compound bean analyzed for every / twelve hours of sample analysis par instrument? r<^ 1 I ACTKU: Zf any tuning data are sussing, take action I specified in 3.2 above. ACXZCN: list data, tiae, instrument ID, and sample | analyses for which no assnrl atari GC/MS tuning ' data are available. TUT 001 0638 34 I SIAMQARD OPERATING TOOUUKt 9 Of 36 Gate: March 1989 Revision 6 YES MO — ———— ——— . .•-.-. . r. Tfff, | —————————————————————————— aMYV<LCi HUnOUO I 7.4 ACTION: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration interval. Have the ion abundance criteria been Bet for each instrument used? ACTION: ACTION: List all data which do not meet ion abundanc criteria (attach a separate sheet). If tuning calibration is in error, flag all associated sanple data as unusable ("R"). However, if expanded ion criteria are set (See 1988 Functional Guidelines), the data reviewer nay accept data with appropriate qualifiers. 7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors BBSS lists and Fora vs? (Check at least two values taut if errors are found, check. Bore.) 7.6 Have the appropriate nunber of significant figures (two) been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors are found check Bore values.) ACTON: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation / resubmittal. Bake necessary con errors under "Conclusions11. ^t__> __ 7.7 Are the spectra of the able? calibration ACTON: Use professional judgement to deternine whether assopiatetl data should be ted, qualified, or rejected. 8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Fora I pieeent with required header information on each page, for each of the foil a. ___ , . or fractions as appropriate b. Matrix spikes end natrix spike duplicates c. Blanks TUT O01 0639 STANDARD OPERATING " 10 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 8.2 An tha TO* Reconstructed Ion nectn for tha idantifiad , tha YES NO N/A itxunda, and tha data ayatan printouts (Quant Reporta) includad in the aaopla padcaga for aach of tha following? a. Sanples and/or fractions aa appropriate b. Matrix apikas and aatrix apDca duplicataa (Mass apactra not raquirad) c. Blanks ACTZGN 8.3 Ara tha Zf any data ax* misaing, taJoa action ifiad in 3.2 abov». factors shown in the Quant Report? ible with Baseline stability Resolution Peak shape lull-scale graph (attenuation) Other:_______________ AdZON: Oaa professional judganant to detezaine tha acoaptability of tha data. 8.5 Are the lab-generated atandazd idantif iad VGA compounds of tha for aach sanpla? ACTZGN: Zf any BBSS spautia ara Biasing, take action specified in 3.2 above. Zf Lab doss not generate their own standard spectra, note in "Contract RroblaaeVMan-ccaplii 8.6 Is the FRT Of nd within 0.06 FKT units of tha standard RRT in tha continuing calibration? 8.7 Are all ions piaaant in tha standard BBSS spectrun at a relative intensity greater than lot also pxeaeiiL in the BUS spectra? 8.8 Do sample and atandazd ralativa ion intanaitiaa within 20%? ACTION: Dee pzofaaaional judgsnant to determine acceptability of data. Zf it ia detazni that inoozzact idantif icati all such data should be rejected, nagged "N" (prasmptiva avidanoa of tha praaaiiaa of tha conpound) or changed to not detected (at t^^* ^^L^^n the calcu liait). TUT OO.1 0640 11 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES MO tt.O Tentatively I**n*'ifi Cfap**"*1? TTCl 9.1 An all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Form I, tart B) present; and do listed TICs include scan number or retention tine, estimated concentration and "J" qualifier? 9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified nds and it*norinted "best Batch" spectra included . / f 1/1 __ __ in the sample package for each of the following: a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate r (A __ __ b. Blanks r «X __ __ ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. ACTION: Add "J" qualifier if nissing and "N" qualifier to all identified TIC compounds on Porn I, tart B. t Are any TCL confounds (frca any fraction) listed as TIC confounds (example: 1,2-dinethylbenzene is >c a VQA TCL—and should not be reported as a TIC)? ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC. TIC confounds (example: 1,2-dijnethylbenzene is xylene— / V I 9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a relative intensity greater than 10% also jjiesaiit in the 9.5 Do TIC and •best match" standard relative ion intensities within 20%? ACTION: Use professional judgement to ability of TIC identifications. If it is determined that an incorrect identi- fication was Bade, change identification to "unknown" or to seme less specific identi- fication (example: "C3 substituted benzene") 20.0 Pi 10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in Fora I results? Check at least two positive values. Verify that the outiect internal standard, quantitation . - ion, and ERF were used to calculate Form I result. . . / Were any errors found? • ' 10.2 Are the CBQEs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions / and, for soils, sample moisture? (So\\ morlrV ('Wed . V on 0-1 TUT 001 O6 41 STANDARD OFDWZNG FKX3HJRE 12 Of 36 Date: Much 1989 Revision 6 YES NO N/A 11.') ACTION: Zf errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubnittal, oaks any necessary correction* and note errors under "Conclusions11. ACTION: Vhen a sample is analyzed at more than one dilution, the lowest CRQXs are used (unless a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis). Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration range in the original analysis by crossing out the "£" value en the original Form Z and substi- tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted sample. Specify uhich Form Z is to be used, then draw a red "X" across the entire page of all Form I'» that should not be used, including any in the sumnary package. Data rGC/MSI *r» the Reconstructed Ion Chrcnatograns, and data system printouts (Quant. Reports) present for initial continuing calibration? ACTION: Zf any calibration standard data are missing, take action specified in 3.2 above. 12.0 OC/MS alibration (Torn vn 12.1 Are the Initial Calibration and ccnplete for the volatile ion? VZ) ACIICN: Zf any calibration standard Bissing, take action specified in 3.2 above. d-d arxfde. - 12.2 Are response factors stable for volatile* concentration range of tha calibration (RSD OOt)? ACTION: Circle all outliers in tad. ACnCN: ttoan RSD >30%, non-detacts say be qualified using professional judgement, flag all positive results "J". Mttn RSD >90%, flag all non-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region ZZ policy.) 12.3 Do any compounds have a RRF < 0.05? ACTION: Circle all outliars in red. ACXTGN: Zf any volatile has an RKF < 0.05, flag positive results for that compound as estiaatad ("J"), and flag non- detects for that ccopound as unusable ("R"). -2,4 TUT OO1 0642 wrcrvu..u«* rruuujunc. *age: ij or jo Data: March 1989 Revision 6 12.4 Art than any transcription / calculation azrors in the reporting of average rasponsa factors (RRF) or %BSO? (Chack at laast two values but if errors are found, check more.) _ _ ACTION: Circle errors in red. ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubnittal, aake any necessary corrections and note errors under "Omrl us i cms 11 , 13.0 GC/MS Onr** IffliliTCfCBTlb'ratipn fFonn VU) 13.1 Are the Continuing Calibration FOOTS (Fora VH) yieaaiit / and ccnplete for the volatile fraction? ' ' 13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed for every twelve hours of sample analysis per - instrument? f A __ '""> List below all sample analyses that were not within twelve hours of the previous continuing calibration analysis. ACXICN: If any forms are nissing or no continuing calibration standard has been analyzed within twelve hours of every sample analysis, call lab for explanation / resubnittal. If continuing calibration data are not available, flag an associated saople data as unusable ("R"). 13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard ccqxunds have / a RRF < 0.05? _i£ I__] __ ACHCN: Circle all outliers in red. If any volatile compound has a RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that coapound as estimated ("J"), and flag nan-detects for that as unusable ("R"). 13.4 Do any compounds have a % difference between initial and continuing calibration RRF > 25%? ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated sample data as outlined in the table below: TUT 001 064:, 9' *MJI_UJU*U. 0.4 or jo Date: March 1989 Revision 6 | 25-50 j 50-90 !'J' positive j'J' positive results, no action results, 'UT for non detects non detects* i ——————————— i ———————— *• i 'J' positive ] results, "R" ! non detects ————————— i '4.<> ii 13.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the reporting of average response factors (FRF) or difference (%D) between initial and continuing SRFv? (Check at least two values but if errors are found, check aore.) ACTION: Cirri e errors in red. ATICN: If errors are large, call lab for explanation / resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and note errors under "Conclusions". MO . 3 Are the internal standard areas (Fora VHI) of every sample and blank within the upper and lower limits fur *»ch continuing calibration? ACTION: List all the outliers below. Sanple I Internal Std Area Lower Liait Upper Liait (Attach if ACXICtf: If the intaznal standard area count is outside tha upper or lover liait, flag with "J" all positive results and ncn- datacts (U values) quantitatad with this intaznal standard. If extremely low area counts are reported, or if exhibits a aajor abrupt drop off, flag all (•*")• 14.2 Are the retention tiaas of tha internal standards within 30 seconds of the associated calibration standard? ACXXCtf: Professional judgement should be used to qualify data if the retention tiaes differ by sore than 30 Tin- 001 0644 uftKAl'.lN5 HCCEDURE Page: 15 of 36 Date: March 1989 Revision 6 YES NO 15.0 15.1 Here any field duplicates submitted for VQA analysis? [__] ACTION: Cdmpare the reported results for field duplicates and calculate the relative percent difference. ACTICN: Any gross variation between field delicate results gust be addressed in the reviewer narrative. However, if large differences exist, identification of field duplicates should be confirmed by contacting the sanpler. I I I I I I I I _ TUT 001 0645 5-7 » ANALYTICAL DATA PACKAGE Volatile Organic Analyai* VoluM I of 1. EPA CAM* Number SDG Nuaber D.t. V»r««r TUT GDI 0646 Vtrxan. k ""•" ' PELIVEBABLES. INPE3C — VGA ANALYSES ONLY I I I. CASE HABBATZV1 A. The narrative contain*i caae and contract nuabera, euaeary of OC analyeea, dieeueaion of any analytical probleaa, and doeuaentatloa of all.corrective actiona •. Copy of Saaple Traffic Beporta. ZZ. OC SUHHABT ! A. Surrogate Percent Beeovery Suaaary (For* ID B. Matrix Spike/Hatrix Spike Duplicate Suaaary (Fora ZZZ) C. Bathed Blank Suaaary (Fora IV) 1 D. OC/HS Tuning and Calibration Standard (Fora V) I ZZZ. SAMPLE DATA A. Organic Analyaia Data Sheet (Fore. I> , B. Tentatively Zdeatified Coapounda (TZC) < C. Bav Data for the Volatile Saaple Fraction 1. Beeonetrueted Zen Chroaatograa (e> 2. Ouantltatlon Bapart 3. Bav BSL aaee epactra and background eubtraet BSL ^ aaee epeetra vith lab generated BSL etaadard epeetri ^" 4. OC/HS library eeareh epeetra for each TZC Betes Saaplee arranged in alpha-auaerle eequenee. ZV. STAMDABDS DATA A. Initial Calibration Data (Fora VI) in order if than one inetruaeat ia ueed. •. VOA etandard(e) raeonatruetad ion ohroaatograaa and quaatitatlon report* for the initial oalibratloata). C. Continuing Calibration <Fora VZZ) ia order by D» TOA ataadard(a) raeonatruetad ion enroaatograaa and ouantltatlon report* for the continuing ealibratloa<c) C. Znternal Standard Data (Fora VIII). V. BAV OC DATA A. BFB (For each 12-hour period* for each OC/HS eyatea> 1. Bar graph epeetrua 2« Haaa lle^itHO '"". UT 001 0647 Iferiar. V. RAW OC DATA (COMT'D) Reagent Rlaak Data 1. Organic Analyaia Data Sheet (Fora I) 2. Tentatively Identified Coapounda (TIC) 3. Rav Data sonatrueted ion ehroaatograafa) and quaatitatlon report (a). b. RSL apeetra vith lab generated ataadard i. law RSL eoapound apaotra I ii. Kahaaeed or background •ubtraeted iii. Laboratory generated ML atandard iv. OC/RS library eearoh apaotra for •aoh TIC . v. Ouaatitatioa/ealeulatioa of eaeh TIC eonoentration 1 C. Matrix Spike/Ratrix Spike Duplicate Data 1. Tabulated reeulta (Fora I) of non-apiked RSL 2. •eoonatrueted ion ehroaatograaa and quaatitatlon VI. SAMPLE PRCPAJUTZOM . A. Faraaeter Requeet Sheet I. Saaple Receiving Log-In Information C. *OA Saaple Coaaenta D. Inatruaent Injection Loga C. Field Chain of Cuatody F. Copy (a) of Federal fjcpreaa Airbilla TUT Q01 O648 c( 4 TOO 30 *II Saptaabar 8, 1989 Marrativa - Volatile Organic Analyaia Organic SAS 4S12B CPA Region II Control 744 Thia raport contain* tha CLP analytical data for tha volatila organic analyaia of thirtaan oil aaaplaa raoaivad in conjunction vith SAS 4912B. Tha aaaplaa liatad balov vara racaivad at Varaar on July 5, 1989. SABCLE USI 46S8B41 4698B48 4658B42 4638B49 4698B43 4638838 4658B44 4658B91 4698B49 4698B52 4698B46 4698B93 4698B47 8AS RCiUIBEBEHS Raport dua data la forty daya af tar VTSR All SAS Saapla Matrix la oil OC/HS Inatruaaat eallbratlona uaing BFB aat aathod apaciflad eritarla for volatila organic analyaia. SPCC and CCC oritaria vara aat for tha initial calibration eurvaa and tha continuing calibration ehaek atandarda. Saapla analyaia for volatila organica occurred vithin tha tvalva hour pariod following daily inatruaent calibration. Due to the very ooaplex nature of the aaaplaa, analyaea vara not eoapleted prior to expiration of aaaple holding tiae oritaria. Internal atandard areaa and aaaoeiatad retention tiaaa did not deviate outaide apacifled vlndova. Volatile aurrogate atandard recovery valuea aet apeolfled criteria for aoat aaaplea. Surrogate recovery criteria uaad for theaa aaaplea vaa developed for the aoil Matrix. Recovery of aurrogata atandarda la tha oil Matrix May not be eoaparable vith the aoil raoovary Unite. One aat of MS/BSD quality control •aaplea vaa analysed. Boat reooveriee aet apeeified criteria. Relative percent difference <RPD> valuea did not aeet •peeifled iteria. Thia May be the reault of the aaaple Matrix. Target ooapounda that did not Meet contract apeeified mmmm •peetral identification criteria ware flagged vith an *X* vhieh Indicate* the praaenoa of tha ooapound ia auapeeted. TUT 001 O6SO Narrative - Pag* 2 SAS 4S12B Please contact Larry Pollack, OC/HS Quality Control Manager, or •*, ahould you require any additional information or have any questions pertaining to the volatile organic analysis of these oil sasples. Releaee of the data contained in this hardcopy data package hmm been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or hi* deeignee, as verified by the following signature. September 8, 1989 .ipda E. Bock GC/HS Data Quality Manager Laboratory Operations Narrative Reviewed Bys GC/HS >ael Bucftana Section Chief TUT 001 51 Data Qualifier Flag* For Target Coapoundai Thia flag la uaad whan aaaa I epeetral data indlcatee the praaanoa of a eoapouad but tha raault la laaa than tha apacif lad dataotioa Halt but atlll graatar than zaro. I For ten Target Coepoundat Thla flag iadieatea that the • concentration la an eetiaated value, aaaualng a 1 to 1 reeponea vith the internal atandard. • Thla flag la uaed vhen the analvte la found la the i blank 'mm veil mm in the eaaple. Xt indleatea I poaaible/probable contamination and varna the data uaar to take appropriate action. I u Thla flag atatea that the compound vaa analyzed for but vae not detected. The number la the minimum attainable i detection limit for the aaaple. X or T Thla flag atatea that the aaaa apeotrum doea not KPA CLP criteria for confirmation, but compound praeenee la etrongly euepeeted. E Thla flag la uaed to indicate that the quantitatlon of the analyte la outaide the linear calibration of the curve and that dilution vaa required la order to properly quaatitate. D Thia flag la uaed to indicate the value for the target analyte vaa calculated from a dilution <eee •£• flag above). Thla flag la uaad vhen a matrix apike compound la alee irmed preeent la the unapiked aample. Plage excerpted from and eatabliahed by the l» KPA Contract Lab Prograa (CLP) protocol. TUT OO1 O652 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. . . .b Nam*i ygRSeB-It-Ci.___________ Contract! ________ I_______ Lab Codes V.EB36B- c**» No- • 4-22-16 SAS No. i __51SB._ SDO No. s !___. I Matrix s <»oil/_at*r> 8Mte.._?' i- Lab Sa-pl* IDi JIkl_U-___ Sanpl* Mt/vols _1..2 <g/»L> Q__ Lab Fil* IDi UZ2fia_... I L*v*ls UoM/-*d> BEE___ Dat* R*c*iv*di fiZl-SlfiS Moi»tur*s not d*c. ____ Columns (pack/cap) EflCIS._ CAS NO. COMPOUND Dat* Analyzedi Dilution Factori 5fi CONCENTRATION UNITSI (ug/L or ug/Kg> UfilKfi 74-87-3 ----- ~ 74-63-9 —— —— - 75-01-4 —— —— - 75-00-3 —— —— - 75-09-E ----- ~ 67-64-1 — ----- 75-15-0 —— —— - 75-35-4 -—— —— 75-35-3 —— —— - 54O-59-0 —— —— 67-66-3 -—— —— 107-06-E —— —— 78-93-3 —————— _- __ _ 56-E3-5 —— —— - 1O8-05-4 —— —— 75-87-4 —— — ~ 78-67-5 — —— ~ 100610-1-5 -—— 79-01-6 — —— ~ 1E4-46-1 —— —— 79-00-5 —— —— - 71-43-E —— —— - 1O061-OE-6 —— - 75-E5-E —— ——— 108-10-1 ------ 591-76-6 — -—— 1B7-16-4 ------ 79-34-5 — — — - 106-66-3 —— —— 106-90-7 ————— 100-41-4 ————— 100-4E-5 ————— 1330-80-7 —— — — Ch 1 or OM*th an* — BroMOMthan* __ — Vinyl Chlorid* — Ch 1 oro*th an* — M*thyl*n* Chlorid* __ .._.____. — Ac*ton* — Carbon Dimulfid* __________ — 1, l-Dichloro*th*n* ... _ . — 1,1-Dichl or o* th an* __ — l,B-Dichloro*th*n* (total) __ — Ch lor of or*, _. — 1, E-Dichloro*than* ______ . __ — E-Butanon* __ _ — 1, 1, l-Trichloro*than*_ ____ . _ — Carbon Tvtrachlorid* ____ ... — Vinyl Ac* tat* __________ — — Bronod ich loron*than* — lTB-Dichloropropan* ______ _. — ci«-lf 3-Dichloroprop*n* . .. — Tr i ch 1 oro*th*n* _ . ______ .. — Dibro«ochloroa*than* ____ — 1 , 1 , E-Tr ich 1 or o* than* . _ .. — B*ni*n* . . ~tran»-l, 3-Dichloroprop*n*___ — Broaofora _ . ___________ _. — 4-M*thyl-fi-P*ntanon* — B-H*xanon* ... __ . _ . _ . ~T*trach loro*th*n*_..__.___^..^. — 1 ,1,8, E-T*trachloro*than* __ .. — Toluvn* »..^_ — Chlorob*nz*n*.. ________ .. — Ethyl b*nz*n*_._.. ___ ._ -— Styrwn*......^.... _ ....... ——A Total Xyl*n*» ______ _i_^M_i_-.Viw- 63000 63000 63000 63000 31000 63000 31OOO 310OO 310OO 31000 31000 31OOO 63OOO 31000 31000 630OO 31OOO 31000 31000 31000 31000 31000 64OOO 310000 31000 63000 160000 B7OOO 31000 45OOOO J1000 4___MMM> 31OOO ^ *__i _i ^ _i _fc _i leooooo I iuu IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU tu IU IU IU 1 IU IU IU < 1 IJ IU 1 IU 1IU> 1 -. ,.l... f _»^p^ '.» . JFORH I VGA TUT OO1 O653 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS • Lab Namet__VERSAR. I Lab Codei_VERSAR___ Matrix* (soil/Mate I Sample wt/voli __ Contract i. L»v«lt (low/mvd) Ca»« No. i430 16 BfL £> i u 4 _(g/nl)S MED * Moi«tur*t not d»c. EPA SAMPLE NO. -;_ A.- ^ - 0 I a SAS No. I4512B SD6 No. i Lab Sample IDi .76162 Lab File IDi _U7903 Date Received! __07/05/69 Date Analyzedi __07/19/69 Dilution Factori Number TIC» foundt _ 6 CONCENTRATION UNITSi (UO/L or UB/KG)_UG/Kg CAS NUMBER 15. __________ BUTANE, 2- UNKNOWN CYCLOPENTANE, METHYL- BUTANE, 2,3-DIMETHYL- UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN BENZENE, PROPYL- 27. COMPOUND NAME •THYL- EBT. CONC. 37i 2. 11 1 I I • I' IJIN/ IJ UN IJ/V IJ IJ IJ UK/ FORM X VOA-TIC TUT 001 O654 So 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ._________ Contracts _. EPA SAMPLE NO. *' ! C - ; j - • , I 4«68*4£ I .d-N-Mi yER§AR_ItlCi.———————————— Lab Code i yiR§AR_ Came No.t 43.0._lfe SAS No.i 45.__1__ SD6 No.i i jlatrixi (toil/water) SSft.filU Lab Sanple ZDi Z6163 Sample Ht/volt __4«.C <g/«L> Q__ Lab film IDi Uft5Z5 Levels <low/_ed> B_B__ Date Received! E: Moisturei not dec. _____ Coluani (pack/cap) ESC&_ CAS NO. COMPOUND Date Analyzedi Dilution Factors CONCENTRATION UNITSi (ug/L or ug/Kg) U84&Q 74-87-3 ----- 74-83-9 —— ~ 75-01-4 —— ~ 75-00-3 ----- 75-09-E ----- 67-64-1 —— — 75-15-0 —— — 75-35-4 — — - 75-35-3 ----- 540-59-0 -—— 67-66-3 ----- 107-06-E —— - 78-93-3 ----- ' 71-55-6 —— ~ v 56-E3-5 ----- 108-05-4 ——— 100610-1-5 — 79-01-6 ----- 1E4-48-1 —— - 79-00-5 —— ~ 71-43-E ----- 10061 -OS-6 — 75-E5-E —— ~ 108-10-1 -—— 591-78-6 ——— 1E7-18-4 -—— 79-34-5 ----- 106-88-3 —— - 106-90-7 —— - 100-41-4 —— - 100-4E-5 —— - 1330-EO-7 —— ——— Ch lor one thane _ ——— Vinyl Chloride — • — Acetone ——— Carbon Ditulfide _ _ _ __ ——— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __ ——— Ch 1 oro f ore. ——— l,E-Dichloroethane _ ——— E-Butanone _ _ _ __ ——— Vinyl Acetate ——— Bro»odichloro«ethane__ _ __ — —— cim-1, 3-Dichloropropene ——— Trichloroethene _ _ _ _ ——— lf l,E-Trichloroethane ______ ——— Benzene _ _ _ _ __ ——— tr anm- 1 , 3-D i ch 1 oropr opene ___ ——— E-Hexanone _ _ _ _ ______ ——— 1 f i f Ef E-Tetrach loroethane-._-_ ——— Toluene. _______ . _____ _, _ — — — — Ch lorobenzene ——— Ethyl benzene __ . ________ _ _ ——— 8tyrene_ ________________ ——— Total Xylenes _ „ _ _ _ x __ 1 63000 IUT 63000 1 U 63000 1 U 63000 1 U 31000 IU 63000 1 U 31000 IU 31000 IU 31000 IU 31000 IU 31000 IU 31000 \U\/ JL 63000 iire-"rT 31000 IU." 1 31000 IU 63000 1 U 3JOOO IU 31000 IU 31000 IU 31000 IU 31000 IU 31000 IU 31000 IU 310000 IU 31000 IU 63000 1 U 63000 1 U 31000 IU 31000 IU 91000 1 31OOO IU eiooo i j 31OOO 1 U 580000 1 it 1 ___ r FORM I VOA TUT 1/87 Rev. 001 O655 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. - -"•;. - •)- > I 4--?»:-2> ~ I Name Contracts Lab Codei VgRiBB. Came No. i 42Q_16 SAS No.i ±5128_ SDO No.t \_____ I Matrixs <»oil/water> SOTtl^/^ Sample Mt/voli 4tQ (g/mL> Q _ I , , | Levels (low/med) BEft___ . % Moistures not dec. _.__ ' Column (pack/cap) I Number TIC« founds _.2 Lab S*»pl» IDt Z6162___. Lab Fil« IDi UflSZS___ Date Receivedi Date Analxz'dt Dilution Factor i 5fi_ CONCENTRATION UNITSi (ug/L or ug/Kg) I I I CAS NUMBER I I m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m | , I I I I I COMPOUND NAME RT I EST. CONC. I FORM I VOA-TIC 1/B7 Rev. TUT 001 0656 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Na-es Contracti Lab Codes V_R§AR_ Case No. s 43.___g SAS No. s I Matrixi (moil/water) Sfitfe_Q/u- Sample wt/vols ___g <g/mL> Q__ I Levels (loM/sied> fl____ j % Moimturei not dec. ____ Columns (pack/cap) E8CK_ SDO No.i Lab Saaple IDs Lab File IDs UfiSZZ__. Date Receiveds _Z_23_ft2 Date Analyzed s O.fl__9.__2 Dilution Factors 50 CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITSs (ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ-l&fi 74-87-3 ———— 74-83-9 ----- 75-01-4 ~—— 75-00-3 ———— 67-64-1 ———— 75-15-0 ———— 75-35-4 —— — 75-35-3 ----- 540-59-0 —— - 67-66-3 ----- 107-06-2 ——— 71-55-6 —— ~ 56-23-5 ----- 108-05-4 —— - •75-27-4 —— -- 78-87-5 ----- 100610-1-5 — 79-01-6 — —— 124-48-1 —— - 79-00-5 ----- 71-43-2 ----- 10061-02-6 — 75-25-2 ----- 108-10-1 —— - 591-78-6 ——— 127-18-4 —— - 79-34-5 —— — 108-88-3 ——— 1O8-90-7 —— - 100-41-4 ——— 100-42-5 ——— 1330-20-7 —— ——— Chloromethane _ ——— Bro»one thane ——— Vinyl Chloride ——— Ch 1 or oe thane _ ——— Acetone ——— Carbon Disulfide _ ——— 1, 1-Dichloroethane ——— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ ——— 1,2-Dichloroethane ——— 2-Butanone _ ——— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane _____ ._ ——— Vinyl Acetate ___ _ ___ ——— -ci»-l, 3-Dichloropropene ——— Trichl or oe thene ______ g ___ ——— Di broaoch lor one thane. ______ —— -1, 1, 2-Tri eh loroe thane ——— Benzene ___ ——— 2-Hexanone ——— Tetrachloroethene _ __ _, _ .._ ——— 1 , 1,2, 2-Tetrach loroethane ^ ——— Toluene jf ——— E th y 1 benzene. _ . _______ „.»/-- ——— Styrene _ . ______ __ —>•- ——— Total Xylene« ____ _ ___ 63000 63000 63000 63000 31000 63000 31000 31000 31000 31000 31000 31000 63000 31OOO 31000 63000 31OOO 31000 31000 31000 31000 31000 31000 310000 31000 63000 63000 310OO 310OO 3AOOOO ejr-v v^r ^ •~r 21000 ^_* ._m_&. 4v _v _v «soooo 11000 160OOOO 1 IU ^ 1*1 ,. IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU , 1 ** 1 JS 1• IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IUr IU 1 ID 1 r 7 > t FORM I VOA 63 It!'! l/a7 Rev. OO1 0657 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Lab Name i __ VERSAR Contract i. I La EPA SAMPLE NO. I-4&38B43 I b Cod«i_VERSAR__ Cas* No. i430_16 SAS No. I4518B 8D6 No. i Matrixi <»oil/*at»r)fiOIL O/L. Lab Sample IDi .76184 Sample wt/voli 4 _<g/ml)G Lab File IDi _UB577 * L»v«ls <low/m«d> MED Data R»c«iv«dt __07/05/89 * Moi«tur«i not dec._____ Date Analyzed! __08/19/89 Dilution Factori _ Numbvr TICm founds CONCENTRATION UNITSI (U6/L or UG/KG)_UG/Kg COS NUMBER 1. ___________ 2- 3. 4. 5. 6. ___________ 7. a. 9. ______ 10. 11. 18. 13. _ ___ _ 14. 15. _ 16. 17. __ 18. ___ _ _ 19. _. _ __ 80. 81. 22. S3. _ _ ____ 84. J ___ r^ 23. . . - - - - 86. __ 27. , 28. _ ^ T_ 29. . _ 30. COMPOUND NAME ^^^ii\NOWni ___ _ • ' . RT 27.3333 -FORM I VOA-TIC TUT 001 0658 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Na.«i Contract i ' Lab Cod*t VERiAR_ Ca»* No. t 43.Q_lfc I Matrix i <»oil/wat*r> -Sftit j^J U Sample wt/vols _ 4±Q <g/*L> g__ Level i <loM/*ed> HEP. __ < Moisture i not dec. __ „_ Columns (pack/cap) PAQ|< _ CAS NO. COMPOUND SAS No. i i512I_. SDO No. I 1 Lab Sa»pl* IDs Z&lftS Lab File ID i yfl522 Date Received i Date Analyzed s Dilution Factor i CONCENTRATION UNITSi (UQ/L or UQ/KQ) U8££fi 74-87-3— 74-83-9— 75-01-4— 75-00-3— 75-09-2— 67-64-1— 75-15-0— 75-35-4— 75-35-3— 540-59-0- 67-66-3— 107-06-2- 78-93-3— 71-55-6— 56-23-5— -Ch 1 or o*e thane______________ -Bro*o*eth an*_____________ -Vinyl Chlorid*____________ -Ch 1 oro*th an*_______________ -Hethylene Chloride_________ -Acetone_____„___.___.______ -Carbon Disulfide__________ -1, i-Dichloroethene_________ -1,1-Dichloroethane___________ -1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__ -Chlorofor«______________.___ -1,2-Dichloroethane___________ -2-Butanone__.__.________.___ -1,lv1-Trichloroethane______ -Carbon Tetrachloride 108-05-4————- 75-27-4————————Bronod ich loro»*thane____.___ 78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropan*__________ 100610-1-5—————ci*-lf3-Dichloroprop*n*______ 79-01-6———————Trichloro*th*n*___________ 124-48-1 ——————Di bro-och lor on* than*_________ 79-00-5———————l,l,2-Trichloro*than*______ 71-43-2——————B*nz*n*________________.--J^- 1OO61-02-6———~tran»-l, 3-Dichloroprop*n*____ 75-25-2———————Broaofor*_________________ 108-10-1———————4-H*thyl-2-P*ntanon*_________ 591 -78-6——————2-H* x anon*________________ 127-18-4——————T*trachloro*th*n*_______,__ 79-34-5———————Ivlf2,2-T*trachloro*than*___ 108-88-3——————Tolu*n*________________f_ 106-90-7——————Ch 1 or o b*n z ene___________._ 1OO-41-4——————Ethyl benzene. 100-42-5——————8t y r ene______ 1330-20-7——————Total Xylenes 13000 13000 13000 13000 6300 13000 6300 6300 6300 6300 .6300 6300 13000 6300 6300 13000 630O 6300 6300 6300 6300 6300 7000 63000 6300 13000 13000 6300 6300 76000 6300 35000 6300 19OOOO I IUj IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU 1*4 1C IUJ IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU I " IU IU IU IU IU IU I IU I IU I .1— FORM I VOA 1/67 Rev. TUT O01 O659 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Names 4658044 VERSAR I Lab Codes_VERSAR__ Ca»e No. s430.16 Matrix s <«oi 1 /water)8G*fc O \L- ' Sample wt/volt 4 _(g/ml)B I Levels (low/med) MED * Moi-tures not dec.______ Number TIC» founds _ Cont r act s ________ I ____________ SAS No.i451SB SDG No.s1 v r' Lab Sample IDs .76185 Lab File IDs _U8579 Date Receiveds __07/05/89 Date Analyzeds __08/19/89 Dilution Factors _ 10 CONCENTRATION UNITSI (UG/L or UG/K8)_UG/Kg CAS NUMBER 1. ___________ 2. _____ 3. 4. 5. 6. _ _____ 7. ___ a. __ 9. __ 10. 11. 12. 13. _____ 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. __ 19. ___ 20. 21. _ ___ 22. _____ 23. 24. ... 25. ^ ^ 26. 27. 28. .,,.,,.. 29. 30. COMPOUND NAME UNKNOWN / . RT 14.8666 EST. CONC. 22000 J . •»• ^•M TUT 001 O660 cr- Q J 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. s , 1 •* '7< Na»«s Contract i Lab Codes VEBSBB- Case No. i 43.Q_1£ SAS No. s ^SlSi.. 8DO No. i 1. Matrixi (soil/water) Sample wt/vols Le ve 11 (1 ow/aed > % Moiiturei not dec. ___ Columni (pack/cap) E8££_ <g/«L) CAS NO. COMPOUND Lab Sampl* IDi 2S1S6 Lab File ID i Uft&lfi Date R«c»iv»di Date Analyzeda Dilution Factor i 5fi___..__ CONCENTRATION UNITSI (ug/L or up/Kg> UQ£L. Q 74-87-3 ————— 74-83-9 ———— - 75-01-4 —— —— 75-00-3 —— —— 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ———— - 75-15-0 ———— - 75-35-4 ———— - 75-35-3 ———— - 540-59-0 ——— - 67-66-3 ———— - 107-06-2 ——— - 78-93-3 ———— - 71-55-6 ———— - 56-23-5 ———— - 108-05-4 ——— - 75-27-4 ———— - 78-87-5 ———— - 100610-1-5 — • 79-O1 -6 ———— - 124-48-1 ——— - 79-00-5 ———— - 71-43-2 ———— • 10061-02-6 — - 75-25-2 ———— - 108-10-1 ——— • 591-78-6 ——— - 187-18-4 ——— - 79-34-5 ———— • 108-88-3 ——— • 108-90-7 ——— • 1OO-41-4 ——— • 100-48-5 ——— • 1330-80-7 —— • —*—— Broaoaethane - —— Vinyl Chloride __ • —— Methylene Chloride __ —— Acetone —— Carbon Dimulfide —— lv 1-Dichloroethene • —— 1,1-Dichloroethane _... • —— 1,8-Dichloroethene (total) __ —— Ch 1 or o fora _ — — 1, 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone _ __ —— Carbon Tetrachloride _ _ ——— Br oaod i ch 1 or oae th ane ____ ____ —— 1, 2-Diehloropropane ____ __ —— ci»-lf 3-Dichloropropene „ _ —— Di broaoch loroaethane _______ —— - trans-if 3-Dichloropropene____ —— Broaofora _ —— 4-Heth y 1 -2-Pent anone _ . __ . _ ——— 2-Hex anone __ __ .. —— -Tetrachloroethene ——— 1, Iv2f 8-Tet r achl or oe thane ___ — —— Toluene _ __ —— Chlorobenzene _____ __ ——— Ethyl benzene _ „ «»»- ——— Styrene —— Total Xylene* _____________ 1 5OO II/C. ***^^» • ^m | ^ 500 1 tf 500 IV 500 (If 850 1 tf > ' 8400 IT O*C/\ it* A C0w 1 49 i*V 850 IV 850 Itt 850 itf 850 IV 850 IV 500 IV 850 IV 850 IV 500 IV 850 IV 850 IV 850 IV 850 IV 850 IV 850 IV 850 IV 850 IX 850 IV* 500 IJ* 500 IV 850 IV 850 IV 850 IV ~ 850 IV -. 850 IV 850 IV 1L " 3OO IX^ 1 TORM 2 VOA TUT _1/87 F»v. O01 0661 § IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. * . .b Na««s yEgSAR_INC«. L*b Cod* I VERSAR Cat* No. i I " . ___ | Matrix i (toil/water) *mf6ft_O/L. SampI* wt/voli _ 5i.Q (g/«L) ML »OBOB45 I• • ' Lvv»ls <IoM/M»d> X Moi«tur»i not dec. ___ Column (pack/cap) BfiCIS _ Numbvr TICm founds _ Q Contract: _________ I SAS No. i 45igg SDG No. i 1 " "" Lab Saapl* IDi Zfelfife Lab Fil* IDs Date R»c«iv«di Dat» Anal/zeds fifi/21^62 Dilution Factor i Jfi CONCENTRATION UNITS s <ug/L or ug/Kg> I I CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME I I RT I EST. CONC. I 0 I I I I FORM J WOA-TIC TUT l/«7 001 0662 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO, _ .b Nam«: 46 Contract i I Lab Coder VERSAR_ Ca»* No. i 43.Q_lfc I Matrixs («oil/«at«r> -gSft.O'L. _ 4t2 <g/«L> g (low/M*d> BED. __ Sampl* wt/vols • Lvvcli SAS No. i 45.1gg _ SDG No. s i Lab Sanpl* IDi ZfilfiZ Lab File IDi UZ213 Date R«c*iv»dt I1oi*tur«i not d*c. __._ Column i (pack/cap) E8C!S_- •-..»*-. CAS NO. COMPOUND Dat* Analyzedi Dilution Factor i 4.Q CONCENTRATION UNITSI (ug/L or ug/Kg) -.-—..«*"^ Q 74-87-3 —— —— 74-83-9 —— —— 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 —— —— 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 —— —— 75-35-4 —— —— 75-35-3 ————— 540-59-0 ----- 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 ———— - 56-23-5 —— —— 108-05-4 ———— 75-27-4 ———— - 78-87-5 ———— - 100610-1-5 — - 79-01-6 ———— - 124-48-1 ——— - 79-00-5 ———— - 71-43-2 ———— - 10061-02-6 — - 75-25-2 ———— - 108-10-1 ——— - 591-78-6 ——— - 187-18-4 ——— • 79-34-5 ———— - 106-88-3 ——— - 108-90-7 ——— - 100-41-4 ——— - 100-4S-5 ——— • 1330-80-7 —— • • —— Ch 1 or o**th an* • —— BroMon*than* • —— Vinyl Chloride • —— Chloro*than* _ _ ___ • —— H*thyl*n* Chlorid* • —— Ac*ton* __ • —— Carbon Disulfid* _ _ ____ • —— 1, l-Dichloro*th*n* • —— l,l-Dichloro*than* _ • —— 1, 2-Dichloro*th*n* (total) __ • —— Ch 1 orof OTm • —— Iv2-Dichloro*than* _ _ • —— 1, 1, l-Trichloro*than* _____ _ • —— Carbon T*trachlorid* mr • wvlMt^W A W • I A Vv t •£•§• wf I Wk 9 IW ^^ ^^ ^»^»^» ^m ^m ^w ^» ——— Trichloro*th*n* ___ —— 1, l,2-Trichloro*than* . ___ ,_ —— 1, 1, 8, 8-T*trachl or o«th an* .._..„. —— To 1 u*n* ___________ _ __ „ jfci. "— — — Ch lorob*nz*n* —— Ethyl b*nz*n* ____ .. ___ . __ _^, —— 8tyr*n* _ ___ .._«„_. _ .__..__. ——— Total Xyl*n*»^___^ __ ^ ^^..J^^ ' 1 50000 IUX 50000 1 U 50000 IU 50000 1 U 85000 1 U 50000 1 U 85000 1 U 85000 1 U 85000 1 U 85000 1 U 85000 1 U 85000 1 U ' 50000 IU 85000 1 U 85000 1 U 50000 1 U 85000 1 U 85000 1 U 85000 1 U 85000 1 U 85000 IU 85000 IU 46000 1 850000 1 U 8500O 1 U 50000 1 U 59000 1 85000 1 U 85000 IU 49OOOO 1 ' C50OO IU 140000 1 . 85OOO IU -9OOOOO 1 2 c. TUT . 1/A7 Jtev. 001 0663 ~- r- IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Names__VERSAR___________ Contracts________ I__________. Lab Codes_VERSAR__ Case No.s430.16 SAS No.s45126 SD6 No.t1 MatriMs (»oi1/water)6etL 0/u Lab Sample IDs _76187 Sample wt/vols 4 _<g/ml)G Lab File IDs _U7913 Levels (low/wed) MED Date Receiveds __07/05/89 * Moisturei not dec._____ Number TIC* foundt Date Analyzeds __07/20/89 Dilution Factors _ 40 CONCENTRATION UNITSt (U6/L or UQ/KB)_UG/Kg CAS NUMBER 1.96-14-0 2. 3. 103-65-1 4. 5. 6. ________ __ 7. a. _ 9. 10. 11. _ 12. _ __ 13. ___ 14. _ 15. 16. 17. _ 18. 19. 20. 21-, ... , ..... „ 22. 23. 24. ___ 25. 26. __ . , _ ^ 27. 28. 29. 30. 1 1 COMPOUND NAME IPENTANE, 3-METHYL- IUNK ETHYL METHYL BENZENE BENZENE, PROPYL- • _ ___ . • RT 19.8333 22.9166 34.4166 _ EST. CONC. 33000 38000 57000 1 1 Q UA/ IJ JtJ ———— ^ •> .x:.»-.--.».- I -VOA-TJC OO1 O664 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. . ^ NJ Lab Cc Matrii Sample L.v.l i % iioii ColUBT i i I i i - ! % IB*: VE,R§AR_JNC, >d*i VgRSAR. EI (•oil/wat*r) t Mt/VOlS (low/B*d> iturvt not d*c. >i (pack/cap) CAS NO. 74-87-3 ————— r^ OO * 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 —— —— 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 —— —— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— 75-35-3 ————— 540-59-0 —— — 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— 78-93-3 —— —— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 1O8-05-4 —— — 75-27-4 ————— 78-87-5 —— —— 100610-1-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— 124-48-1 ----- 79-00-5 —— —— 71-43-2 —— —— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 —— —— 108-10-1 ———— 127-18-4 —— — 79-34-5 —— —— 108-88-3 ----- 108-90-7 ----- 100-41-4 — —— 100-42-5 —— — 1330-20-7 —— - 1 JOB8D47 1 t Contracts 1 1 Ca«* No. i 43.0._ife SAS No. i 4S.lgf €iik.&u Lab Sj _ itfi <g/BL> fi __ Lab Fi BEB __ Dat* F ___ Dat* t BBCK _ Diluti CONCENTRATIC COMPOUND (ug/L or ugy —— Ch 1 or OB* th an* —— BroBOB*than* —— Vinyl Chlorid* —— Ch 1 or o* than* —— M*thyl*n* Chlorid* — -Ac*ton*_ _ —— Carbon Disulfid* —— 1, l-Dichloro*th*n* __ „ - — 1, l-Dichloro*than* —— l,2-Dichloro*th*n* (total) __ —— Ch lorof ora —— l,E-Dichloro*than* _ __ —— 2-Butanon* • —— 1, 1, l-Trichloro*than* —— Carbon T*trachlorid* _ _ • —— Vinyl Ac.tat* —— BroBod ich loroB*than*____<-.__— _ • —— 1,2-Dichloropropan* ______ • —— 'C i m- 1 f 3-D i ch 1 oropr o p*n*__— _„_ • —— Tr i ch 1 oro*th*n* • —— D i broBOch 1 or OB* th an* _ • —— 1, 1, 2-Trichloro*than* _____ ,/! • —— 2-H*xanon* ___ _ ____ __ „ • —— T*trachloro*th*n* _ • —— 1,1,2, 2-T*tr ach 1 oro* th an*....., • —— Tolu*n* _^ """""Ethyl b*nz*n* — — _ J!^»« • —— Tota 1 Xy 1 *n*« ___ . ______ «/ _ t SDQ No. i i iBpl* IDi 26ififi__._, l* ID i U22I8 __ . (*c*iv*dt &2^fi3£ft2 tnalyz*dt Q2^2fi^fi2 on Factor i gfi _____ IN UNITSs 'Kg) UB4SQ 0 25000 1 U Jj 25000 1 U 25000 1 U 25000 1 U 13000 IU 25000 1 U 13000 IU 13000 IU 13000 IU 13000 IU 13000 IU 13000 1 U 25000 IU 13000 IU 13000 1 U 25000 1 U 130OO IU 13000 IU 13OOO IU 13OOO IU 13000 1 U 13000 IU 11000 \f 130000 IU 13000 IU 25000 1 U 25000 1 U 13000 IU 13000 IU 13000O 1" 13OOO IU 49OOO 1 13000 1 U 330000 1 * 1 _. r c FORM I VGA l/«7 R*v. TUT 001 0<b65 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. .. r - -j. _ } .;X I I46MB47 Lab Nam»t__VERSAR___________ Contract:________ _____________ Lab Cod»i_VERSAR__ Ca»« No. 1430.16 SAS No. 1451 SB SO6 No. 11 Matrixi <«oil/wat»r)8ett &>L Lab Sample XDi .76186 Sample wt/vols 4 _(g/ml)G Lab File IDi _U7912 Levels (low/med) MED Date Received* __07/05/69 * Moisturei not dec._____ Dat* Analyzvdi __07/20/69 Dilution Factors _ 20 Number TIC» foundi _ CONCENTRATION UNXTSi <UG/L or UG/KQ)_UG/Kg 1 CAS NUMBER 1 1.110-54-3 1 2. 569-34-4 1 3. 103-65-1 4. 5. _____ ___ 6. 7. 6. 9. 10. _ __ 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. ____ 16. ___ _____ 17. 16. __ 19. __________ 20. 21. ____ 22. ____ _ _ 23. 24. 25. 26. ______ _ 27. 26. 29. 30. . COMPOUND NAME HEXANE (DOT) HEXANE, 3-METHYL- BENZENE, PROPYL _ *T 19.6666 23.25 34.45 EST. CONC. 31000 JfJ J J IV i FORM X VOA-TIC. \o\, b TUT OO1 O666 VOLATILE ORCANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: VER5AR INC. Contract: Code: VERSAR Case No. : 43O 1A SAS No. : 4S12B SDC No. : Matrii: (toil/water) Sample wt/vol: Level: (low/eied) X Moisture: not dec. _____ Coluem: (pack/cap) PACK Lab Saaplo ID: Lab File ID: Date Received: 76189 Y6877 Q7/QS/B9 Date Analuied: O7/19/B9 Dilution Factor: 1O CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UO/KQ 0 74— RT— *?—__— 74-83—9——— 79-01-4 ——— 73-OO-3 ——— 73-O9-2 ——— 67-64-1 ——— 73-13-O ——— 7D— 3D— ^———— 73-34-3 ——— 34O-39-O —— 67-66-3 ——— 107-O6-2 —— 78-93-3 ——— 71-33-6 ——— 36-23-3 ——— 1O8-O3-4 —— 73-27-4 ——— 78—87—3———— 1O061-O1-3— . 79-O1-6 ———— 124-48-1 ——— 79-OO- 3 ——— 71-43-2 ——— 1O061-O2-6— •;«_,o— u.^ 108-10-1 ——— 391-78-6 ——— 127-18-4 ——— 7^~ ^^^V" mt • ™ • 1OB-B8-3 ——— X08-9O-7 ——— 1OO-41-4 ——— 1OO-42-3 ——— 1330-20-7 —— •-•".. __~- .."" —- —— Ch lor o«e thane ——— Broe>o«ethana_ ——— Vinul Chloride —— — Chloroethane^, ———— Hethulene Chlarida ——— -Acetone ——— Carbon Disulfide — • —— 1. 1-Dichloroethene ——— -I. l-Dichloro«thane 1.2-Dlchloroethene (total) __ — —Ch lor of ore), ,. ——— -1« 2-Dichloroe thane ——— •2-Butanone ———— if 1. l-Trichloroeth-m»._. ___ __ ——— Carbon Tetrachlorid* ——— Vinyl Acetate ——— Broaod ich loroMth_m» — — — 1« 2-Dichloroiroeane —— — ei»-i» 3-Dichloropropene ——— -Trichloroethene ——— Dibroa)ochloro*)ethAn« ———— 1* 1.2-Trlchloroethane — • — -Bent ana _. •> ——— Tran«-i« 3-Dichloropropene ___ ——— -Broaofora) _ ———— 4H1eth«l-2-f>ent«non. _ _ _ — — -2-Heianone — —— Tetrachloroethene ——— 1» i» 2« 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ —— —Toluene — — — Chlorobenzene — — -Ethulbenieno_. — — -Btyrene , , ,., ———Total Xylenec ^ ... . -^ .._-.._ ..-,— -. - . 1 -, 13000 lUvT 13000 IU 13000 IU 13OOO IU 63OO IU 130OO IU 6300 IU 6300 IU 6300 IU 6300 IU 6300 IU 6300 IU\k 13000 I*T_R I 3900 UTU" \ 6300 lUf 13000 IU 63OO IU 6300 IU 6300 IU 6300 IU 6300 IU 630O IU. 4000 U^ 6300 IU 6300 IU 13OOO IU 13000 IU 6300 IU 13OOO IU 110OOO 1 6300 IU 61OOO 1 I 4300 IU* leooo wrr I VGA 1/87 Rev. -LIT OO1 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name:__VERSAR_____________ Lab Cod«z_VERSAR__ Ca«« No. s430_16 Matrixi <»oil/wat»r^SOIL O/L, Sample wt/voli 4 _(g/ml)G Lev*It (low/Hied) MED * Moimturvi not dec.______ HOBOD48 Cont ract i ________. I ________ SAS No. I4512B SDG No. tl Lab Sample IDi _76159 Lab File IDi _Y6677 Date Received! __07/05/69 Date Analyzed! __07/19/69 Dilution Factors _ 10 CONCENTRATION UNITSi Number TIC» founds _ 1 (UG/L or UG/KG) __UG/Kg CAS NUMBER 1 . 526-73-6 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. __ __ 15. 16. 17. 18. ____ _ _ 19. 20. 21. _ ___ 22. 23. _ ___ 24. 25. 26. _ _ _ _ . 27. ____ __ 26. 29. _ 30. COMPOUND NAME BENZENE. 1 f 2, 3-TRIMETHYL- —————————————————————————— . —————————————————————————— __________________________ RT 28. 0633 _ _______ _______ > ______ _ _______ __ _ __ _ EST. CONC. SfMMttfll , __ ,_ . ___ _ ————————— ————————— Q JA/ ———— in FORM I VOA-TIC TUT 00.1 0668 VOLATILE ORCANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET NO. Lab Name: VERSAR INC Cod»: VERSAR __________ Contract: Cast No. : 430 1A SAS No. : Matrix: <toil/water> Sample wt/vol: 4. 0 (g/ad.) Level: (lou/mtd) MED X Moisture: not dac. ___ Column: (pack/cap) PACK SDO No. Lab Sample ID: 7619O Lab Fila ID: Date Rccvivad: ¥6876 07/OS/B9 Datt Analyiad: O7/19/B9 Dilution Factor: 1O CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS (og/L or ug/Kg> 1 74-87-3 —— 74-83-9 —— 79-01-4 —— 79-OO-3 —— 79-O9-2 —— 67-64-1 —— 79-19-O —— 79-39-4 —— 79-34-3 —— 940-99-O— 67-66—3—— ^F 9 VW* VV 107-O6-2— 78-93-3 —— 71-99-6 —— 96-23-9 —— 1 WO— U3^^ 79-27-4 —— 78-87-9 —— 1OO61-O1-9 79-O1 -6 —— 124-48-1 — 79-OO- 9 —— 71-43-2 —— 10O61-O2-6 1O8-1O-1 — 991-78-6 — 127-18-4 — 79-34-9 —— 108-88-3— 1O8-9O-7 — 10O-41-4 — 1OO-42-9 — 4 ****/% **^%— ^ \ 33O— ZO— 7— - . — ———— -Chloro*tthan« • ———— Broaiontthan* ————— Vingl Chlorid. ————— Chl or o« titan* ————— Mathylan* Chlorid* ————— Ac* ton* ———— Carbon Disulfid* ———— -1. 1-Dichloroathana ————— 1* 1-DichloroathMM _ , _ ————— 1.2-Dichloro*thtn« C total! ————— Chlorofora) ————— 1.2-Dichloroathjin« . „_ ———— 2-Butanon* ————— 1. 1. l-Triehlor>a*th«n* ————— Carbon Tatrachlorid* . ————— Vin^jl Acatat* ————— Broaodicllloroa*th«n* ————— l.S-Dichloroprap«fiB ———— -ci»-lf 9-DichlaraprBp*n« ————— Trichloro«th*n* . _ ., ————— DibraaiochloroM«th«n« _, —— •! —— 1. l.S-Trlchloro»th*n« ————— Banzana ———— Tran»-l» S-Diehloropropana^^,^ ————— Broaoforai —————— 4-tlBthvl-2-P*nt«nan*| ———— -2-Ha i anona — ———— Tatrachloroathana ———— -1. l«2<2-Tatracbloro*thana_ __ ————— Taluana. _ << ———— -Chlorob«nz*nc ———— -Ethylbanian* »/ ————— Btyrana.. - —— —Total Xulana* J -• ———— r -A::!«-' 13OOO 13OOO 13000 13OOO 3800 13OOO 6300 63OO 63OO 6300 630O 6300 13OOO 63OO 6300 13OOO 43OO 6300 6300 63OO 6300 6300 63OO 6300 63OO 13OOO 13000 6300 13OOO 24000 6300 13000 4300 120OOO • o^i. . •— - - - • - — 1 . !U, IJU IU IU IX tu tu IU IU IU IU IV\ tr iu: IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU 1 IU 1 IU> ur: w 1 _ r L 1 (A ^ ^^^•M FORM i VOA 1/87 R»v. TUT 001 0669 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name:__VERSAR. L. I Contract t 13> I46S6B49 I b Codes.VERSAR__ Ca»e No. 1430.16 Matrix! <»oil/water>eett. O i_- Sample Mt/volt I Levels Uow/med) 4 _(Q/ml)6 MED I Moisturei not dec. Number TIC» found! SAS No. 1451SB SDG No. il Lab Sample IDs .76190 Lab File IDi _Y6676 Date Receivedi __07/05/89 Date Analyzed! __07/19/69 Dilution Factort 10 CONCENTRATION UNITS: <UG/L or UG/KG)_UG/Kg CAS NUMBER 1.933-98-8 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. a. 9. 10. 11. 12. ___________ 13. _ _ 14. 15- _ - — - 16. _ __ 17. 16. 19. _ _______ 20. 21. __ ___ 22. __________ 23. 24. _ ___ 25. 26. _ „ __ _ 27. „ ___ 26. __________ C9. 30. 1 COMPOUND NAME 1 BENZENE, 1 -ETHYL-2, 3-DIMETHY UNKNOWN ____________________ ________________ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ ________ ___ _ ____________ _ , .. RT 23.4 32 _ _ EST. CONC. 5400 7500 ____________ ______ ___ „ . - _ Q JV J ___ I I TUT 001 0670 FORM I VOA-TIC i 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. i V-lb Nane: Lab Code: VgRSAR 1 Matrix: (soil/water) MflTgB_£/ L. Sample wt/vol: _5tfi (g/mL) ML._ I Level: (1 ow/Med > L.Qg__ i X Moisture: not dec. _.__ Columnt (pack/cap) PAQK_ Contract: _________ I______ Case No.: 430_i§ SAS No.: 4512§_ SDO No.: i___ Lab Sample ID: Zfil21_!__ Lab File ID: US&53__ Date Received: 2Z/Q5/62 Date Analyzed: e§/24/§2 Dilution Factor: CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (UQ/L or UQ/KQ) Ufi/l._ FORfl I VOA 74-B7-3 ———— 74-83-9 ———— 75-01-4 ———— 75-00-3 ———— 67-64-1 ———— 75-15-0 ———— 75-35-4 ———— 75-35-3 ———— 540-59-0 ——— 67-66-3 ———— 107-06-2 ——— 78-93-3 ———— 71-55-6 ———— 56-23-5 ———— 108-05-4 ——— 75-S7-4 ———— c O O r «J 100610-1-5 — 79-01-6 ———— 79-00-5 ———— 71-43-2 ———— 1O06 1-02-6 — 75-25-2 ———— 108-10-1 ——— 591-78-6 ——— 1B7-18-4 ——— 79-34-5 ———— 108-88-3 ——— 108-90-7 ——— 100-41-4 ——— 100-42-5 ——— 1330-20-7 —— ——— Ch 1 oroavth an* ——— Br o«o*»t h an* ——— Vinyl Chloride ——— Chloro»than»_ _ _ ——— M»thyl»n» Chloride ——— Acetone ^ ——— Carbon Diaulfide ——— 1, 1-Dichloroethene ——— 1, 1-Dichloroethane ——— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ ——— Ch lorof or« ——— 1,2-Dichloroethane _ ——— 2-Butanone ——— 1, 1, 1-Trich lor oe thane _ _ _ ——— Vinyl Acetate ——— BroHOdichloro»ethane _____ . _ ——— 1, 2-Dichloropropane ——— ci»-lf 3-Dichloropropene _____ — - — -1, 1,2-Trichloroethane ——— tran«-l, 3-Dichloropropene ___ ——— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone _ _ ——— 2-Hexanone _ . _ _ _ ____ ——— Toluene _ ____ —— -Chloro benzene _ __ ——— Ethyl benzene ___ ——— Styrene ________________ .._ ——— Total Xylene* . _____ 10 10 10 10 5 13 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 S 53 5 5 5 nfl 114 irf 1 D IU 101 •T \* if 1 14 III \\f \\l \\f IU Itf • JO IU IV I MlM5 1 U If* 111 iir \v IU IU in "U IW IU' \* **, ll/ IM^ •Vi5 i *< i. K £_ 1/87 Rev. T OOi O671 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. i .,b Names ygRSAR.ItJQ.._______ Lab Codes ygRSAR_ Case No.s I Matrixs (soil/water) 'WSTIB.D/^ Sample wt/vols _5tQ (g/mL> ML_ I Levels (low/med) L.QW__ i X Moistures not dec. ____ Column (pack/cap) P.A.C.K I Number TIC* founds _Q I -4666*60 Contracts _____m___ l______ SAS No.s 451ie_ SDO No. i 1. Lab Sample IDs Z6121. Lab File IDs Uft6S3. Date Received! Date Analyzeds QS/24/S2 Dilution Factors CONCENTRATION UNITSs (ug/L or ug/Kg> I I CAS NUMBER I I COMPOUND NAME RT 1 I. I EST. CONC. I mmmmmmmmmmm\ r_ ^ORM I VOA-TIC 1/67 Rev. TUT OO1 O672 VOLATILE ORCANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ERA SAMPLE NO. Lab Nam*. VER5AR INC. Contract: Jb Code: VERSAR Cat* No. : 43Q la SAS No. : 4312B SDG No. : Matrii: <»oil/uatar) -«mr OtL- Lab Sample XD: 76192 Sample ut/vol: 4.0 (g/«L) fi__ Lab Fila ID: Y6B73 Laval: (lou/mad) HEP Data Racaivad: Q7/O3/B9 X Moittura: not dac. ___ Data Analgzad: Q7/19/89 Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: Ifl_____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg> UQ/KQ *T4 _a*T_*3_—_~^__. 74-83-9 ———— —— 75-01-4 ———— —— 75-OO-3 —————— ^^_/\B_"T________ 67-64-1 ————— — 75-15-0 ——— ——— 75-35-4 —————— 75-34-3 ——— — — 54O-59-O ————— 67-66—3—— — — - 107-06-2 • ^^ r +^^f BM 78-93-3 —————— - 71-35-6 —— ———— 36-23-5 ——————— 108-05-4 —— ——— 75-27-4 —————— 78-87-5 — ———— - 1O061-O1-S ———— 79-0 1 -6 ————— — 1 24—48— 1 •- -• • a> Mb • ^** * 79-OO-S —————— 71-43-2 ——— ——— 1OO61-O2-6 ———— T^—*^^—.** — 1O8-1O-1 ————— 591-78-6 ————— 127-18-4 —————— 79-34-5 ——— —— 108-88-3 ————— 1O8-9O-7 — ———— 1OO-41-4 —————— 1OO-42-5 — • —— — • ^v^r ~wmm ^ 1330-20-7 — ——— - '•:•"----•.!::- — Chloromathana — Broaioaathana — Vinul Chlorida — Ch lor o» than* — Mathylana Chlarid* . . „ . __ — Acatona —Carbon Ditulfid* — 1. 1-Dichloroathana — 1* 1-Dicfiloroathana _, . — 1.2-Dichloroathana (total)__ — Chlarofora) — 1.2-Dichloroathana .... . — 2-Butanona — 1. 1< l-Triehloro«th«n» .. */ —Carbon Tatrachlarii!* ,._„„. -Vinyl Acatata — BroAodichloroaathana _. _ „_ —1. 2-Dichloropropana — eim-li 3-Dlehloraprap»na — Trichloroathan* — DibroaochloroaathAna ,„.._,„ — 1, 1, a-TrlchlOfaath«n*.__ ._ . — Ban x ana * — Tran»-l» 3-Dichloropropana __ _ — BroBaforai , ... -4-«. t h v 1-2-Pantmnan. — S-Haianona — Tatrachloroathan* . _. - _. — 1. l»2*2-Tatrachloroathana __ „ — Taluana • —Ch lor ob an tana — Ethylbanzana S —fiturana —Total Xylanam </ :.^ . r •-.« ' ... .. .. . . . .. .. . , 13000 luTT" a> vv^v^rvr • ^^^^F 13000 IU 1<VW) III A«JWw I V 13OOO IU 6300 IU 13000 IU 63OO IU 63OO IU 6300 IU 63OO IU 43OO IU 63OO IU V y 13OOO IKF. f 2SOOO 1 :~ 63OO IU 13000 IU t f^f^f* III 43OO IU 63OO IU 63OO IU A3OO IU 1 6300 IU 63OO IU 12OOO 1 6300 IU 6300 IU 13OOO IU a> MM M w • mf 13OOO IU f^f\f\f\f\ • 3OOOO 1 13OOO IU a* h* w M w • *f 91OOO 1 63OO IU 92000 1 63OO IJU • ^fv-w*mr »«r latftooo i *t- \ j- 1 1/87 K«v. TUT OOi 0673 o IE VOLATILE ORGAN I CS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. , r_ ,- i i Lab Nam»i __ VERSAR ___________ Contract i ___ Lab Cod* i _ VERSAR __ Case No. :438_16 SAS No. i4512B Matrix* <»oi l/wat»r> 96-ft Gfc Sampl* Mt/voli 4 _<g/ml)G L»v» It (1 ow/mvd > MED % Moi»tur«i not time. I_______I SDG No.i1 Lab Sampl* IDs _76192 Lab Fil» IDt _Y6875 Dat* R»c«iv»di __07/05/89 Dat* Analyzedi __07/19/89 Dilution Factors _ 10 Number TICm foundi CONCENTRATION UNITSi (U6/L or UG/KG)_UG/Kg CAS NUMBER 1. a. 1634-04-4 3.96-14-0 4._ , 3. ______ 6. 95-63-6 7. 526-73-8 a. 9. __ ______ 10. _ 11. ________ IS. 13. 14. 15. ____ __ 16. 17. 18. _ . _ __ 19._ ______ 20. 21. 22. __ __ £3. _ ____ 2*. -,.. . , 8S- .^ JL_ 26- __^^ 87. 28. 29- . 30. 1 1 COMPOUND NAME 1 UNKNOWN PROPANE, 2-METHOXY-2-HETHYL- IPENTANE, 3-METHYL- UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON 1 UNKNOWN BENZENE, 1,2, 4-TR I METHYL- BENZENE, 1,2, 3-TRIMETHYL- _ __ RT 18. 6833 14.45 17. 8833 19.8333 22.9666 27.8666 33.9166 __ _ EST. CONC. 19000 85000 7900 8000 S900 16000 140000 ___ . 1 1 0 ... J JNl IJW J IJ JK> J** ^M^VI^ FORM I VOA-TIC -71? <-• C TUT 001 0674 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. Name: VERSAR.INC. Contract: I 4£5d9G3 I Lab Code: VERSAR_ Ca»e No.: 43.0_i§ SAS No.i 4512g_ SDG No.: Matrix: (soil/water) Sample wt/vol: _ 4..0 (g/mL) g __ I Level: (low/Med) MED __ X Moisture i not dec. ___ I ColuMn: (pack/cap) PAgK _ Lab Sample IDi Z6124__. Lab File ID: UZ23§__. Date Received: 0.7/S5/6.2 Date Analyzed: fiZ£gO./fi2 Dilution Factor: gO.0___. CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uQ/L or UQ/KQ) gg/Kg 74-83-9 ————— 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 ————— 75-09-? ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ———— - 75-35-3 ————— O^V a^«~v 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— 78-93-3 ————— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 108-05-4 ———— 75-27-4 ————— 76-87-5 ———— - 100610-1-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— 1C^ ^O A — «—— - 79-00-5 ———— - 71-43-2 ———— - 10061-02-6 — - 108-10-1 ——— - 591-78-6 ——— - 127-18-4 ——— - 79-34-5 ———— - 108-86-3 ——— - 108-90-7 ——— - 100-41-4 ——— - 100-42-5 ——— - 1330-20-7 —— - • —— Chloronethane • —— Brononethane • —— Vinyl Chloride • —— Chloroethane • —— Methylene Chloride • —— Acetone • —— Carbon Disulfide _ • —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene • —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane • —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ • —— Chloroform • —— 1, 2-Dichloroethane • —— 2-Butanone • —— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane • —— Carbon Tetrachloride • —— Vinyl Acetate _ • —— Bro«odichloroaethane_ • —— 1,2-Dichloropropane • —— ci»-lf 3-Dichloropropene • —— Trichloroethene ___ _______ —— DibroMOChloroaethane_ _ . —— 1 v 1 , 2-Tr ich loroethane —— -Benzene ——— tran«-l, 3-Dichloropropene ___ —— Broaofore, _ _ __ ——— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene _ ^ — — - 1,1*2, 2-Te t r ach 1 or oe th ane^..... ——— Toluene __ _ ___ _ j._ — — Ch lor o benzene _ ——— Ethylbenzene _ _.f«._ —— Styrene _ ——— Total Xylene* _ _ ______ ^_ 250000 250000 250000 250000 300000 34 0000 130000 130000 130000 130000 130000 130000 250000 130000 130000 250000 130000 130000 130000 130000 130000 130000 130000 1300000 130000 250000 250000 91000 130000 92000 130000 130000 130000 230000 1iu: IU IU lUv K§ IU* IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU 14^ IU \jr IU IU IU 1 J :f & FORM Z VOA TUT 1/67 Rev. O01 0675 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. I . .b Na»ei VERSAR.INC.. _________ contracts _______ i L*b Codes yERSAR_ Case No. \ 430_i6 SAS No. s 4S1HB _ SDG No. i I Matrix s (soil/water. SQI8.-O/L. Sample wt/vol: _4tO <g/mL> Q__ Levels <low/med> ME.fi__ X Moistures not dec. ___ Column (pack/cap) E9CIS_ Number TICs founds __fi Lab Sample IDs 7&194 Lab File IDs Date Receiveds Date Anal/zeds Dilution Factors gQO CONCENTRATION UNITS I (ug/L or ug/Kg) I I CAS NUMBER I mmm-mmmmmmmm COMPOUND NAME RT I EST. CONC. I Q I mmmmmmmmmmm | mmmmm \ I I FORM I VOA-TIC Rev. TUT 001. O676 1A VOLATILE ORCANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ERA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name: VERSAR INC ab Code: VERSAR j___________. Contract: Cat* No. : 430 1A SAS No. : Matrijt: (soil/water) Sample wt/vol: Level: (lou/med) MED X Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) PACK (g/mL) 8DC No. : 1_ Lab Sample ID: 76193 Lab File ZD: Date Received: Y6B74 07/Q5/B9 Date Analyzed: O7/19/89 Dilution Factor: 1O CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ/KQ f • 7at— PT— 3———— 74-83-9 —— 75-O1 -4 —— 75-OO-3 —— 75-09-2 —— 67-64-1 —— 75-15-O —— 75-35-4 —— 75-34-3 —— 540-59-O — 67-66-3 —— 107-06-2— 78-93-3 —— 71-55-6 —— 56-23-5 —— 108-O5-4 — 75-27-4 —— 78-87-5 —— 10O61-O1-5 79-01-6 —— 124-48-1 — 79-OO-S —— 71-43-2 —— 1OO61-O2-6 75-25-2 —— 1O8-1O-1 — 591-78-6 — 127-18-4 — 79-34-5 —— 108-88-3 — 1O8-9O-7 — 1OO-41-4 —— 100-42-5 — 1330-2O-7- - — ' "" * '.-.>„, •a----- *•"• * .-t*fr-ir • i'jf*,.*"*!' ""*. 4^. ** ' »-*^fc- * *--**•»* • <. m*"m* > — — —— Chloromethane ————— Bromome thane ———— Vingl Chloride ————— Chloroethane_ ————— Methul*ne Chloride ————— Acetone ————— Carbon Disulfide ————— !• 1-Dichloroethene ————— 1. 1-Dichloroethane 1.2-Dichloroethene (total) __ - ---Chloroform ———— 1» 2-Dichloroethan* ———— »2-Butanone ————— •!• 1* l-Trichloroe'th'an» «/ ———— Carbon Tatrachlorld* ———— Vinul Acetate ———— BromodichlorometiiM* ——— — It 2— Dichlorooropane ———— elm— i» 3— Dichlorepropene ____ ———— Trichloroethene ———— -Dibromochloromethan* ————— It l«2-Trlchloroethan* ———— Benz»ne_ ^ ———— Tran«-l. 3-Dichloroprop«ne_ __ - —— -Bromoform ———— 4-Methul-2-Pentanon> ———— 2-Heianone ———— -Tetrachloroethene * ———— 1« 1. 2« 2-Te trach lor oettiane ___ — —— -Toluene ___ _, j — - — -Chlorobenzene ——— -Ethulbenzene %/ ——— — 8tvrene__ ——— —Total Xulvnet «/ - — ~r —.*. ~f t | nm i VOA _j^--^ss^*:^:-^' - .. • £.- .._. *?zr ^a&^f'f&f-'- -^ "'*^> :'— T- T v 13OOO 13OOO 13000 13OOO 63OO 13000 63OO 63OO 63OO 63OO 6300 63OO 13000 42000 6300 13OOO 63OO 63OO 63OO 63OO 63OO 6300 63OO 6300 6300 1300O 13000 63000 13OOO 97000 4300 19OOO 4300 190000 «3L. TUT C *' K' 1 . tu. IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU> IX 1 > IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU 1 IU 1 IJU 1MK i*a 1 J 01 ! r r » ^/1 J 787 »67; tor ^-O- n^ i*h Rev. ;•• VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO Lab Namt: VERSAR INC. 430 ab Cod*: VERSAR Cat* No. ____ Matrii: <toil/wat*r> -6G«r & IU Sampl* wt/vol: 4. 0 (g/mL> L*v»l: Uou/m*d) MED X Moittur*: not d*c. ____ Column (pack/cap) PACK Number TJC» found: _Q. Contract: II SAS No. : 4512B SDG No Lab Sampl* ID: Lab Filt ID: Date R*c«iv*d: Y&874 Date Analgzvd: O7/19/B9 Dilution Factor: 1O____ CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ/KQ FORM X VOA-TIC 1/87 R«v. TUT 001 0673 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Name: VERSAR_INC... Contract EPA SAMPLE NO. 1 1 VBLK95 1 Lab Code: VERSAR_ Case No.s 430.16 SAS No.: 4512B_ SDG No.: I Matrixs (soil/water) Sample wt/vol: _5tO <g/mL> ML._ I Levels (loM/med) L.OU__ % Moistures not dec. ___ Column: <pack/cap) P6CK_ Lab Sample IDs VBLK9.5 Lab File IDs UZS2S__. Date Receiveds ________ Date Analyzed: QZ/12/§§ Dilution Factors la.fi. CAS NO. 74-87-3 ——— 75-01-4 ——— 75-00-3 ——— 75-09-2 ——— 67-64-1 ——— 75-15-0 ——— 75-35-4 ——— 75-35-3 ——— 540-59-0 —— 67-66-3 ——— 107-06-2 —— 71-55-6 ——— 56-23-5 ——— 108-05-4 —— 75-27-4 ——— 76-67-5 —— - 100610-1-5- 79-01-6 —— - 79-00-5 —— - 71-43-2 —— - 10061-02-6- 75-25-2 —— - 106-10-1 — - 591-78-6 — - 1E7-16-4—— 79-34-5 —— - 106-68-3 — - 106-90-7 — - 1OO-41-4 — - 100-42-5 — - 1330-20-7— CONCENTRATION UNITS s COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ/U_ • ———— Chloromethane • ———— Bromomethane • ———— Vinyl Chloride • ———— Chloroethane • ———— Methylene Chloride _____ • ———— Acetone • ———— Carbon Disulfide • ———— 1, 1-Dichloroethene • ———— 1, 1-Dichloroethane • ———— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __ • ———— Ch lorof orm • ———— 1, 2-Dichloroethane • ———— 2-Butanone • ———— Carbon Tetrachloride - ———— Vinyl Acetate ____ ———— Bromodichloromethane ———— 1, 2-Dich lore pro pane ———— cis-l,3-Dichloropropene ____ —— • — Tr i ch 1 oroethene ———— 1T 1, E-Trichloroethane ____ _ ———— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ___ ———— Bromoform — • ——— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ____ ———— Tetrachl oroethene ____ ———— Toluene ____ ———— Ethyl benzene. ___ ———— Styrene ______ __ _____ - ———— Total Xylenem ___ _______ 10 10 10 10 5 1O 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 S 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 •5 •555 Q 1 IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU 1 • - TU 00! 0,79 I IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. Lab Name:__VERSAR_____________ f Lab Code:_VERSAR__ Case No. :430_16 Matrix: <»oi1/water)WATER Sample wt/vol: 5 _<g/ml)ML I Level: (low/med) LOW * Moisture: not dec.______ IVBLK95 I Number TIC* founds Contract:__________ SAS No.:4512B SDG No.il Lab Sample ID: _VBLK95 Lab File ID: _U7895 Date Received: _________ Date Analyzed: __07/19/89 Dilution Factort 1 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (UG/L or UG/KG)_UG/L 1 CAS NUMBER 1.124-38-9 1 2. _ _ __ 1 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. a. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. ___ 23. 24. ___ 25. _ ________ 26. __ 27. _ ___ __ 28. _ __ _ ___ 29. __ 30. ___ COMPOUND NAME CARBON DIOXIDE (ACN) UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON ___________ _ __________ _ __________________________ ____ _ ___ _ __ _ _ _ RT 1.7 32.5 33. 1166 33. 8666 EST. CONC. 7 2 3 4 ' 1 Q J J J J TUT 001 O68O FORM I VOA-TIC -^ /. „ C- 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO I VBLK11 Name: VERSAR INC. Contract: I Lab Code: VERSAR_ Case No.: 430_16 SAS No.: 4512B_ SDG No.: !____ Hatrixi (soil/water) WATER. Lab Sample IDi VBLK11___ Sample wt/vol: _5tg <g/mL) ML._ Lab File ID: UZ2I1___ Level i (low/med) L.QW__ Date Received: * Moisturei not dec. ___ Date Analyzed: 07/20/89 Column: (pack/cap) PACK_ Dilution Factor t 1..Q___ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) US/I 74-87-3 ————— "7 A A ^ Q f ^ O W i7 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 ————— 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— 75-35-3 ————— 540-59-0 ———— 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 108-05-4 ———— 75-27-4 ————— 78-87-5 ————— 100610-1-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— 79-00-5 ————— 71-43-2 ————— 10061-02-6 —— 108-10-1 ——— - 591-78-6 ———— 127-18-4 ———— 79-34-5 ————— 108-68-3 ———— 108-90-7 ———— 100-41-4 ———— 100-42-5 ———— 1330-20-7 ——— —— Ch lor ome thane —— Bromomethane —— Vinyl Chloride —— Chloroethane —— Hethylene Chloride —— Acetone —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene —— lf 1-Dichloroethane —— 1, 2-Dichloroethene < total) __ —— Chloroform —— 1,2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Vinyl Acetate — — — Bromod ich lor ome thane —— 1, 2-Dichloropropane —— ci»-l, 3-Dichloropropene —— Trichloroethene —— Dibromochloromethane —— 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— tran»-l, 3-Dichloropropene ___ —— Bromoform —— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1 « 1 « 2f 2-Tetrach loroeth ane ___ —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Ethyl benzene —— Styrene —— Total Xylenes 10 10 10 10 4 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 IU IU IU IU IBJ IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU 1 FOKI1 1 VGA 1/87 Rev. TUT OO1 O6S1 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS . .0 Name: VERSAR_INC... Contract: EPA SAMPLE NO. I I VBLK11 I Lab Cod*: VERSAR Case No.: 430_16 SAS No.: 4512B _ SDG No. s 1. Matrix t (soil/water) UATgR_ Sample wt/vol: _5..Q <g/»L> Ml._ Level: (low/wed) LOW__ % Moisture: not dec. _____ Colunn (pack/cap) PAQK_ Number TIC* found: _2 Lab Sanple ID: VIL.KU___ Lab File ID: y22il__. Date Received: _______ Date Analyzed: Q7/2fi/fi2 Dilution Factor: l_fi_.__. CONCENTRATION UNITS: <ug/L or ug/Kg> I I CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME I I I I I RT I EST. CONC. I Q I I I I '„ ^FDRH X VOA-TXC._ 001 0682 57 Rev. 1A VOLATILE ORGftNICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. .^, Name: ygRSAR_INC.._____________ Contract: Lab Code: yERSAR_ Case No.: 430_16 SAS No.: 4512B 4512B 1 1 1 VBLK29 . 1 1 1 SDG No. : 1 Matrix: (soil/water) UATER_ Sample wt/vol: _5tO (g/mL) Ml._ Level: (low/med) L.OW__ < Moisture: not dec. _..._ Column: (pack/cap) PACK_ Lab Sample IDi yBLK.29^_____ Lab File ID: U7929_____ Date Received: ________ Date Analyzed: 07/20/69 Dilution Factor: 1-.0. CAS NO. 74-87-3 ————— r ** 0*9 7 75-01-4 ————— 75-OO-3 ————— 75-09-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-3 ————— 54O-59-0 ———— 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— 78-93-3 ————— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 108-05-4 ———— 75-27-4 ————— 100610-1-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— 79-00-5 ————— 71-43-2 ————— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 ————— 1O8-10-1 ———— 591-78-6 ———— 127-18-4 ———— 79-34-5 ————— 106-68-3 ———— 108-90-7 ———— 100-41-4 ———— 100-42-5 ———— 1330-20-7 ——— CONCENTRATION UNITS: COMPOUND <ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L_ —— Chloromethane —— Bromome thane —— Vinyl Chloride —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride —— Acetone —— Carbon Dimulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene —— 1, 1— Dichloroethane —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ —— Chloroform —— 1, 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Vinyl Acetate —— -Bromodichloronethane —— 1, 2-Diehloropropane —— cim-lf 3-Dichloropropene —— Tr i ch 1 oroethene —— Dibromochloromethane _ —— 1, lf 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— tran»-l, 3-Dichloropropene_. __ —— Bromo fora —— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachl oroethene —— lf 1T 2f 2-Tetrachloroethane ___ —— Toluene —— -Chlorobenzene — -Ethyl benzene —— Styrene __ _ _ _________ —— Total Xylenei _ _ 10 10 1O 1O 3 14 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Q 1 IU IU IU IU IBJ IB IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU 1 _ FORM I VOA TUT 001 0683 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. I VBLK29 . .b Name: VERSAR_INC..____________ Contract: _________ I Lab Code: VERSAR_ Case No.: A30_i& SAS No.t 4512B_ SDG No.: I Matrix: (soil/water) UAJER_ Sample wt/vol : _ §tO <g/»L> ML _ I Level: < low/wed) L.QW __ * Moisture: not dec. ___ Column (pack/cap) PAQK; _ Number TICs found: _ 0 Lab Sample IDi yBLKg9__. Lab File IDi UZ229__. Date Received: ______ Date Analyzed! Q7/22/6? Dilution Factor: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) gfi/U_ I I I CAS NUMBER I I »»»«»«.«»».«« I, I I I I I COMPOUND NAME RT I EST. CONC. I FORM I VOA-TZC 1/B7 Rev. TUT 1ft VOLATILE ORGflNICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAHPLE NO. >^o Name: VERSAR INC Lab Code: VERSAR Matrix: (soil/water) Sample Mt/vol: Level: (low/med) % Moisture: not dec. Column: (pack/cap) CAS NO. 74-87-3 ————— 74-83-9 ————— 75-01-4 ————— 75-00-3 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-0 ————— 75-35-4 ————— >*^ 75-35-3 ————— 540-59-0 ———— 67-66-3 ————— 107-06-2 ———— 78-93-3 ————— 71-55-6 ————— 56-23-5 ————— 1O8-05-4 ———— 75-27-4 ————— 10O610-1-5 —— 79-01-6 ————— 79-OO-5 ————— 10061-02-6 —— 75-25-2 ————— 108-10-1 ——— - 79-34-5 ————— 108-88-3 ———— 108-90-7 ———— 100-41-4 ———— 100-42-5 ———— 1330-20-7 ——— 1 1 1 VBLK71 1 Contract: 1 | Case No.: 430 16 SAS No.: SDG No.: 1 SOIL _ Lab Sample ID: VBLK71 5.0 (g/mL> G Lab File ID: U8571 MED __ Date F ___ Date f PACK Diluti deceived : Inalyzed: Q8/19/89 on Factor: 1.3 CONCENTRATION UNITS: COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) U.G./K.G. Q —— Chlorome thane —— Bromomethane —— Vinyl Chloride —— Chloroethane —— Methylene Chloride —— Acetone —— Carbon Di«ulfide —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ —— Chloroform —— 1, 2-Dichloroethane —— •2-Butanone —— 1, lf l-Triehloro«thane —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Vinyl Acetate —— 1, 2-Dichloropropane —— ci»-lf 3-Dichloropropene —— Tr i eh 1 oroe then* —— D i bromoch 1 or ome tn ane —— 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane —— Benzene —— tran»-l, 3-Dichloropropene ___ —— Bromoform _ _ —— 4-Hethyl-2-Pentanone —— 2-Hexanone —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1 f 1 f 2, 2-Tetr ACh loroethane ___ • — — Chlorobenxene • —— Ethyl benzene — ~~ Styrene — — _ — — — • —— Total Xylene* _ _ _ 1 1300 IU 1300 IU 1300 IU 130O IU 630 IU 1300 IU 630 IU 63O IU 630 IU 630 IU 630 IU 630 IU 1300 IU 630 IU 630 IU 1300 IU 63O IU 630 IU 630 IU 630 IU 630 IU 630 IU 630 IU 6300 1 U 630 IU 1300 IU 1300 IU 630 IU 630 IU 630 IU 630 IU 630 1 U 630 IU 630 IU 1 • FORM I VGA TUT OO1 O6S5 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. . .b Name: yERSAR_INC..______________ I Lab Code: VERSAR_ Case No.: 430_1_> • Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL._ Sample wt/vol: _5..0 (g/mL) G__ I Levels (low/med) MED__ I I VBLK71 I I % Moisture: not dec. ___ Coluwn (pack/cap) E9QK. Contract: _________ I__________ SAS No. : ______ SDG No. : !____ Lab Sanple IDi _?§_.K71__. Lab File IDi US52I__. Date Received: ______ Date Anal/zed: Q§/19/fi§ Dilution Factori 1_.3___ Number TIC» found: _Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg> I I CAS NUMBER I-«-»»»-««.->. COMPOUND NAME I I I I RT I EST. CONC. I Q . I I FORH I VOA-TIC C ' O 1/67 Rev. TUT 001 0686 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET .^ Name: VERSAR_INC.._____________ Contract: ____. Lab Code: VERSAR_ Case No.: 430_i6 SAS No.: 4518B. EPA SAMPLE NO. I I VBLK01 I SDG No. Matrix: (soil/water) WATER_ Sample wt/vol: _5..Q Cg/mL) ML_ Levels (low/med) LOW__ X Moisture: not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) PACK_ Lab Sawple IDi yBLKOi^_. Lab File ID« y8601__. Date Received: ______ Date Anal/zed: 08/81/52 Dilution Factori CAS NO. 74-87-3 ——— 74-83-9 ——— 75-01-4 ——— 75-00-3 ——— 75-09-8 ——— 67-64-1 ——— 75-15-0 ——— 75-35-4 ——— 75-35-3 ——— 540-59-0 —— 67-66-3 ——— 107-06-8 —— 71-55-6 ——— 56-83-5 ——— 108-05-4 —— 75-87-4 ——— V8-87-5 ——— 100610-1-5- 79-01-6 ——— 79-00-5 ——— 71-43-8 ——— 10061-08-6- 75-85-8 ——— 108-10-1 —— 591-78-6 —— 1E7-18-4 —— 79-34-5 ——— 106-66-3 —— I 106-90-7 —— I 100-41-4 —— 1 100-48-5 —— 1 1330-80-7— J _ __ - \. w '*•* CONCENTRATION UNITS: COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ/L. ———— Chloronethane ——— Bromomethane ———— Vinyl Chloride ———— Ch 1 or oe thane ———— Methylene Chloride ———— Acetone ———— Carbon Di»ulfide ———— 1, 1-Dichloroethene ———— 1, 1-Dichloroethane ———— 1, 8-Dichloroethene (total) __ ———— Ch lore fora ———— 1,8-Dichloroethane _ ———— 8-Butanone ———— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ———— Carbon Tetrachloride _ _ ———— Vinyl Acetate • ———— BroMod 1 ch lor one thane • ———— 1, 8-Dichloropropane • ———— ei«-lf 3-Dichloropropene • ———— Tr ich loroethene • ———— Dibroaochloronethane • ———— 1, 1, 8-Trichloroethane • ——— Benzene • ———— BroMofore. • ———— 4-Hethyl-8-Pentanone _ _ • ———— 8-He x anone • ———— Tetrach loroethene _ ___ • ———— 1 , 1,8, 8-Tetrach loroethane ___ . • ———— Toluene _ __ ___ ______ *— — —— Styrene , „_ _.^- „ _ _ _ _ . _,.____ • ———— Total Xylei>e» _____________ 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 • ' 5 .5 -, . S isSlillilf^ ? : S "„, • >'- /• 3 0 1 IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU 1 0687 R»v. IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. I I VBLK01 i . .o Name: yERSAR_INC..____________ Contracti _________ I_____ Lab Code: yERSAR_ Case No. i A30_lfe SAS No.: 4512B_ SDG No.: 1. • Matrix: (soil/water) WATER_ * Sample wt/vol: _5..0 <g/mL> ML_ I Level (low/med) LOU__ % Moisture: not dec. ___ | Column (pack/cap) PACK_ I Number TZCs founds _0 Lab Sample IDi VBL.!<01___ Lab File IDi yS6Q!____ Date Received! ______ Date Analyzedi Q8/2i/§9 Dilution Factor: CONCENTRATION UNITS I (ug/L or ug/Kg) I I CAS NUMBER I ««»»..»»• I COMPOUND NAME I I I I RT I EST. CONC. I Q I I FORM Z VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev. TUT 001 0688 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE NO. 1 1 1 1 VBLK52 . I 1 ^_j Name: VERSAR_INC..____________ Contract: Lab Code: yERSAR_ Case No.: 430_i§ SAS No.: 4512B_ SDG No.t 1. Matrix: (soil/water) WATER. Sample wt/vol: ____ (g/mL) ML_ Levels <low/wed) LOW__ * Moistures not dec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) PACK_ Lab Sample IDs UBLK5.2__. Lab File IDs US652__. Date Received: ______ Date Analyzeds Q8/g3/g9 Dilution Factors CAS NO. 74-87-3 ——— 75-01-4 ——— 75-00-3 ——— 67-64-1 —— - 75-15-0 ——— 75-35-4 ——— 75-35-3 ——— 540-59-0 —— 67-66-3 ——— 107-06-8 —— 78-93-3 ——— 71-55-6 ——— 56-23-5 ——— 108-05-4 —— 75-27-4 ——— 78-87-5 ——— 100610-1-5- 79-01-6 ——— 124-48-1 —— 79-00-5 ——— 71-43-2 ——— 1OO61-02-6- / 3 C 3 C 108-10-1 —— 591-78-6 —— 1E7-1B-4 —— 79-34-5 ——— 108-88-3 —— 108-90-7 —— 1OO-41-4 —— 100-42-5 —— 1330-20-7 — CONCENTRATION UNITS t COMPOUND <ug/L or ug/Kg> Ufi/L_ ——— Ch loronethane ———— BromoMethane ———— Vinyl Chloride ———— Chloroethane ———— tlethylene Chloride ———— Acetone ———— Carbon Dieulfide ———— 1, 1-Dichloroethene ———— 1, l-Diehloroeth*ne ———— 1, E-Diehloroethene (total) __ ———— Chloroform ———— 1, 2-Dichloroeth*ne ———— 2-But«none ———— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ———— Carbon Tetrachloride ———— Vinyl Acetate ———— Bromodichloroaethane ———— 1,2-Dichloropropane ———— cim-1, 3-Dichloropropene ———— Triehloroethene ———— D i broaoch 1 or one th ane ———— 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane ———— Benzene ——— -tran«-l, 3-Dichloropropene ___ ———— BroMO fora ———— 4-Hethyl-B-Pentanone ———— 1 , 1 , 2 f 2-Te t r ach 1 or oe t h ane ___ ———— Toluene ———— Chloro benzene ———— Ethyl benzene — - — Total Xylene* >__ i 10 10 10 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 595 . 5959 Q 1 IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU 1/A7 TUT 0689 IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS EPA SAMPLE NO. I I VBLK5S I .b Name: VERSAR_INC Contract: I Lab Code: VERSAR. Case No.: 430_16 SAS No.: 451g§_ SDG No.i 1_____ Matrix: (soil/water) UATgR_ Lab Sample ID: ViJ_K5g_____. Sample wt/vol: ____ <g/mL) ML_ Lab File ID: ya§52______ Level: (low/med) tQW__ Date Received: _____m_ % Moisture: not dec. ___ Date Analyzed: Q8/g2/82 Column (pack/cap) PAQSS_ Dilution Factor* i______ Number TIC* found: _2 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (UQ/L or ujj/Kg) I I CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME I I I I RT I EST. CONC. I I I FORM X VOA-TIC 1/67 Rev. TUT 001 069O VOLATILE ORCANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: VERSAR INC. VBLK73 )b Code: VERSAR Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: _4 Level: (low/med) HEP _______________ Contract: Case No. : 430 16 SAS No. : (g/mL) SOG No. Lab Sample ID: VBLK73 Lab File 10: Date Received: Y6B73 X Moisture: not dec. ____ Column: (pack/cap) PACK Date Analgred: O7/19/89 Dilution Factor: 1. Q CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UO/KO : 74-B7-3 ——————— Chloromethane 74-83-9 ——————— BromoMe thane 75-01-4 ————— ^^_ rt/t_ •»— 75-O9-2 ————— 67-64-1 ————— 75-15-O ————— 75-33-4 ————— T*f— 1A--1— _____ 540-59-O ———— 67-66-3 ————— 1 n7_nA_9— ___ 78-93-3 ————— 71-55-6 ————— • *__•*•* _ • 108-05-4 ———— 75-27-4 ————— 7o_e*r_^______ 10061-O1-S —— 79-01-6 ————— 124-48-1 ———— ^o_nn_— i 71-43-2 ————— 1OO61-O2-6 —— »?« •%« ^ / &— 2 a— Z—— •• • - 1 no— 1 o— t — — — — M- 591-78-6 ———— 127-18-4 ———— 79-34-5 ——— — 108-88-3 ———— 108-9O-7 ———— 1OO-41-4 ———— 1OO-42-5 ———— 133O— 2O—7 • v^WW Bfcw f 1 33O-2O-7 ——— —— Vin^l Chloride —— Chloroethane —— Methulene Chloride —— Acetone —— Carbon Disulfide —— 1. 1-Dlchloroethene —— 1. 1-Dichloroethane —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __ • — -Chlorof or« —— 1. 2-Dichloroethane —— 2-Butanone —— 1* 1. 1-Trichloroethan* —— Carbon Tetrachloride —— Vinyl Acetate —— Bro«odichloroaethan» —— li 2-Dichlorooropane — -ei»-l» 3-Dichloropropene —— Tr ich loroethene —— Dibro«ochloroaethan* —— 1. l,2-Trichloro.th_n. ... — -Benzene —— Tr«n»-l« 3-Dichloropropene ___ —— Bro«of or«__ ., —— 4-Hethul-2-Pent_non. —— 2-Heianone __ —— Tetrachloroethene —— 1> if 2> 2-Tetrachloro«th"ane —— Toluene —— Chlorobenzene —— Eth^lbenxene —— Sturene • — -Total Xulcne* •••• -Xylene ,_ 1 13OO IU 1300 IU 1300 IU 13OO IU 63O IU 13OO IU 630 IU 630 IU 630 IU 63O IU 630 IU 630 IU 13OO IU 630 IU 630 IU 130O IU 63O IU 63O IU 630 IU 63O IU 630 IU 63O IU 630 IU 630 IU 63O IU 130O IU 1300 IU 630 IU 13OO IU 630 IU 63O IU 430 IU "430 IU 430 IU • ' 430 IU RDRM I VGA 1/87 Rev. "LIT (OOi 0691 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Lab Name: VERSAR INC. Contract: VBLK73 ab Cod*. VERSAR Cast No. : 430 16 SAS No. : 4512B SDC No Matrii: (toil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: VBLK73 Sample wt/vol: 4. 0 (g/mL) (low/med) Y6873 Level: (low/med) MED 7. Moisture: not dec. ___ Column (pack/cap) PACK Number TIC* found: _0 Lab File ID: ______ Date Received: ______ Date Analgted: O7/19/B9 Dilution Factor: 1.Q CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ/KQ CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME FORM X VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev. TlT 001 0692 VOLATILfc UKGANiCb ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: VERSAR INC. ab Code: VERSAR Case No. : 430 16 Matrii: (toil/water) SOIL Sample wt/vol: 4. Q (g/mL) fc_ Level: (low/med) MED X Moiiture: notfdec. ___ Column: (pack/cap) PACK Contract: 4658B49MS SAS No. : 4512B SDC No. : 1 Lab Sample ID: 7619Q Lab File ID: Y6B79 Date Received: O7/OS/89 Date Analyzed: Q7/gQ/B9 Dilution Factor: 10____ CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or og/Kg) UQ/KO ! ! 74-87-3 ——— 74-83-9 - 73-01-4 ——— 73-00-3 ——— 73-O9-2 —— - 67-64-1 ——— 73-13-0 ——— 73-33-4 ——— 75-34-3 ——— mjtf\ BO_/* 34O— jy— O-— — 67-66-3- —— - 107-O6-2— A w r ^^«tf Bk 7O_eOi— f* 71-33-6 ——— ^4t_9*3_4* ____ 1O8-03-4 —— 73-27-4 ——— 78-97-3 ——— 10061-OI-3- 79-O1-6 ——— 1 1A — AO 1 .. __ 79-OO-3 ——— 71-43-2 ——— 1OO61-O2-6- T^— 3^— 9— ——— . / y «w « ! 108-1O-1 —— ! 391-78-6 —— I 127-18-4 —— J 79-34-3 ——— 1 108-88-3 —— 1 1O8-9O-7 —— I 1OO-41-4 —— 1 1OO-42-3 —— 1 1330-20-7— 1 1 ———— Chloronethane —— Bronoete thane ———— Vinyl Chlorid* ———— Chloroethane ———— Methglene Chlarid* ———— Acetone ———— Carbon Disulfide ———— 1. 1-Dichloroethena ———— 1. 1-Dichloroethane ———— 1'2-Dichloroethene (total) __ — —- — -Ch 1 or of or* • ———— 1. 2-Dichloroethan* ———— 2-Butanone ———— 1, l» 1 -Tr ictil or oe thane ———— Carbon Tetrachlaride ———— Vinul Acetate ———— BromodichloroMthane _ ———— li 2-Dichlorooropane ———— c i»-l • 3-Dich loropropene ____ ———— Trichloroethena ———— DibroaochloroABthana ———— 1. l«2-TriChloraethan» ———— Bentene ———— Tran«-l* 3-Dich loropropene ———— Broaoforei ———— 4-Methul-2-Pent«non» ... , —— — — — z— neianone, _ ———— Tetrachloroethene ———— 1. It 2. 2-Tetrachloroethane ———— To 1 uene . ,. __ — • —— Chlorobenzene —— —— Ethyl benzene ....... -Btyrene . 1 • ••• Total Xulenec . _ J 130OO IU 13000 IU 13000 IU 13000 IU 63OO IU I3OOO IU 63OO IU 63OO IU 63OO IU 6300 IU 63OO IU 63OO IU 1 3000 IU 630O IU 630O IU 13OOO IU 63OO IU 63OO IU 63OO IU 63OO IU 63OO IU 63OO IU 63OO IU 63OO IU 63OO IU 13OOO IU 130OO IU 63OO IU 130OO IU «y 6300 IU 9<?OOO 1 , ...... , r i^ooop i 1 FORM X VOA 1/87 Rev. oo: 0693 VOLATILE ORCANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET NU. Lab Name: VERSAR INC. ab Cod*. VERSAR Cat* No. Contract: SAS No. : I 469BB49HSD Matrii: (»oil/water) SOIL Sample ut/vol: 4. Q (g/«L) L*v*l: (low/aad) HEP X floittur*: not d*c. ___ Column: (pack/cap) PACK SDO No. : Lab Sampl* ID: 7619O Lab Fill ID: Y6B80 Data Received: Q7/OS/B9 Data Analyzed: O7/gQ/B9 Dilution Factor: 10 CA8 NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ/KQ 74-87-3 ——— ——— 74-83-9 ————— — 79-01-4 —————— 7 3— Oy— 3——— — — — — • 79-O9-2 ———— —— 67-64-1 — —— —— 79-19-0 —————— 79-39-4 —————— 79-34-3 ————— — 94O-99-O ——— —— 67-66-3 —— —— ** r hvfe^ •* 107-06-2 ————— 78-93-3 ——— —— - 71-99-6 —————— 96-23-9 —— - ——— 1OB-O9-4 ————— 79-27-4 ——— - —— 78-87-9 ———— - — 1OO61-O1-9 ———— 79-01-6 ——————— 1 24-48- 1 ----- <*> •*> 9 ^** at 79-00-9 —————— 7 i -43-2 ——————— 1OO61-O2-6 ———— 79-29-2 —————— 108-10-1 —————— 991-78-6 ——— — - 127-18-4 ——— —— 79-34-9 ——— ——— ioe-se-3 ——— 108-9O-7 ——— ——— 100-41-4 ——— —— ioo-42-g 1330-20-7 ————— • ..-»•-«_.— — --• — Ch lor o«* than* — Bro«oa)*than* —Vinul Cblorida — Chloro*than* — H*tbul*n* Chlarlda —Ac* tan* —Carbon Dlsulfid* — 1. l-Dichloro*thana — 1. l-Dichloro*thana — 1.2-Dichloro*th*n* (total) __ — Chloro'ora) ,., — 1* 2-Dichloro*than» — 2-Butanon* — 1* 1* l-TrlcbloraathAna.__. —Carbon Totrachlarirf* —Vinul Ac*tate — Broaod icb loroaatiiAn*^ — 1.2-Dichloroerap«n» ,..._„ — ci«-l. 3-Dicbloroprop*n* ____ — Trieblorootbana -Dibra*)ochloro**tk«n. _ _ __ — 1« 1.2-Tricbloraathana — Banian* — Tranm-l« 3— Diehlaraat>n**na — Broaiafor* -4-Ha t bu l-2-Pe« tmnnn. — 2-H*«anon*_,. _, — Tatracblorootltana —If If 2«2-T*trachloro*than* ___ — Taluana. _ -Cb 1 or ob *n i *n* -Etbulb*ni*n* -fituran* -Total X«l*n*c -e - --S •>*"-—., . ----- —^ _... _._ ^ 13OOO 13OOO 13000 13OOO 6300 I3OOO 43OO 4300 4300 4300 43OO 4300 13000 43OO 4300 13000 43OO 4300 4300 43OO 43OO 4300 43OO ^BIWW 4300 43OO 13OOO 13000 4300 13000 4300 jitilooo ^f * "^tk^ftO .-HiteobQ •I*^-*J^-^ _ 1 IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IV IU 1 IU 1 I 1 I VOA 1/87 R*v. p*^«-^:t- •>*)•»• •.••.-.f- —»-.-.«.•-.-. j." .^i -"• . • '.'- '• ' _-i£:'' *•.!•»-'•;•..?"•- O694 REFERENCE NO. 12 "UT 001 06 9 b CDM Federal Programs Corporation June 27, 1989 Ms. Caroline Kwan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10278 Contract No: 68-01-7331 Document No: T648-C02-LR-DKKP-1 Subject: Overview of 104(e) Letter Response Sampling in the Tutu Wellfield Area and Supercat Laundromat Area, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands Dear Ms. Kwan: From June 5, 1989 through June 9, 1989, CDM Federal Programs Corporation (CDM FPC) conducted a second round of 104(e) letter response sampling activities at the following facilities in the Tutu Wellfield Area: O'Henry Dry Cleaners, Ramsay Motors, Consolidated Auto Parts (now Gasset Motors), Esso Tutu Car Care Center, Texaco Tutu Service Station, and the Laga Building. During the same time interval, CDM FPC conducted 104(e) letter response sampling in the Supercat Laundromat Area at the following facilities: Supercat Laundromat, Caribbean Jeep Rental, and the Texaco Station. The sampling was done in an attempt to reveal potential sources of chlorinated hydrocarbon contamination found in area ground water. Permission to enter the facilities to be sampled was obtained by Gregory Rhymer from the St. Thomas Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR). Mr. Rhymer also obtained and arranged for the disposal of the decontamination solvents which were used by CDM FPC during the sampling activities. The following is a summary of the 104(e) letter response sampling by facility: TUTU WELLFIELD AREA O'Henry Dry Cleaning Facility; A total of 3 soil samples were collected from this facility using hand augers during the second round of 104(e) sampling. Two of the samples were collected from a single boring location located directly under a pile of debris, which includes discarded filters used in dry cleaning processes. These samples were composited from soil 6-15 inches and 15-24 inches below the ground surface. During the sampling activities, sustained HNu readings exceeding 90 ppm (benzene equivalents) were detected in the borehole. The third soil sample was collected approximately 8 feet south of the first borehole. No sustained HNu readings above background (0.2 ppm) were detected in this second borehole. TUT 001 0696 40 Rector Sow, 10th Floor New York, NY 10006 2U 393-9634 COM Federal Programs Corporation Ms. Kwan Laga Building; Several samples were collected in an area containing abandoned drums adjacent to the Laga Building. A preliminary assessment of the area indicated 9 empty 55 gallon drums which are corroded and/or rusty, 16 sealed 55 gallon drums containing unknown product, 1 unsealed 55 gallon drum containing unknown product, 3 plastic drums, and 2 empty 35 gallon drums. Three soil samples were collected from the drum area. During the soil sampling, the HNu readings ranged from background to 40 ppm above background in the boreholes. One aqueous sample was collected from the open drum containing product, however no HNu readings above background were determined in the drum. One additional sample of a dry, white powdery material was collected from the bottom of one of the empty drums. Ramsay Motors Facility; Upon re-inspection of this facility, COM FPC personnel observed a stained region with stressed vegetation adjacent to the fence separating the Ramsay Hotors and Consolidated facilities. The oily material causing the stain apparently originated from the Consolidated Auto Parts Facility, which is topographically upgradient of the Ramsay Hotors Facility. One soil sample was collected directly below the stained and stressed vegetation. During the sampling, HNu readings were detected up to 3 ppm above background in the borehole. One oil sample was also collected from the waste oil UST located in the auto mechanic shop at the facility. Consolidated Hotors Facility; COM FPC personnel collected one grab sample of the oily material in the drainage ditch on the northern perimeter of the Consolidated Hotors Facility. Esso Tutu Car Care Center; Two oil samples were collected from this facility.One was collected from the inoperable oil/water separator, and the other from the waste oil holding tank. The capacity and integrity of the holding tank is unknown, however, it should be noted that the tank contained approximately 3 inches of material during this sampling round, and the waste oil level was at least 2 feet higher during the first 104(e) sampling round (September 1988). Texaco Tutu Service Station: A total of 7 oil samples were collected from this facility. One of the oil samples was collected from the oil/water separator, one was collected from the floor drain of the middle work bay, and 5 oil samples were collected from drums containing waste oil located behind the facility. TUT O01 COM Federal Programs Lx>rporation Ms. Kwan SUPERCAT LAUNDROMAT AREA Supercat Laundromat! Two water samples were collected from the Supercat Laundromat. One was collected from the potable cistern and one from the non-potable cistern. An attempt was made to collect a sample from the well located at the facility, but a leak in the discharge pipe made it impossible to purge the well and obtain the sample. One sediment sample was also collected from the drain originating behind the facility. Caribbean Jeep Rental: A total of 5 soil samples were collected in the vicinity of this facility. Two of the samples were collected adjacent to the fence bordering the western side of the facility. BNu readings in the boreholes of these samples reached up to 10 ppm. Two soil samples were collected inside the fenced area. The final soil sample was collected adjacent to the Texaco Station sign, located adjacent to the gate of the Caribbean Jeep Rental facility. During the collection of the latter three soil samples, HNu readings substantially above background were not encountered. One aqueous sample was collected from an UST of unknown contents located approximately 20 feet west of the Caribbean Jeep Rental fence. The material was black and oily in nature, and readings exceeding 3 ppm above background were detected in the tank during sampling. The oil samples, aqueous drum sample, and the powdery drum sample were collected for volatile organic analysis only, all other samples were collected for full TCL organic analyses, as well as EP toxicity metals and total petroleum hydrocarbons. The validated sample results and conclusions about the data will be delivered to you as soon as they are available. Should you have any questions regarding the 104(e) letter response sampling, please do not hesitate to call me at (212) 393-9634. Sincerely, GDM federal Programs Corporation t B. Grabe; III Project Manager cc: Jose Fonte EPA-CFO Gceg Rhymer DPNR-St. Thomas Amy Chester ORC COM FPC Document Control COM FPC NYC File (WP14/30) TUT 001 O69S II I I I ' REFERENCE NO. 13 I I I I I I I I I I I TUT 001 0699 I I FINAL REPORT ON RESULTS OF SOIL GAS SURVEY, TUTU, ST. THOMAS, U. S. VIRGIN ISLANDS December 18. 1987 Prepared for: TEXACO CARIBBEAN. INC. III Prepared by: GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS, LTD. HEADQUARTERS 500 Copper Avenue. NW Suite 200 Albuquerque. New Mexico 87102 (505) 842-0001 FAX (505) 842-0595 WESTERN REGION OFFICE EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE 5000 Birch Street 1109 Spring Street West Tower. Suite 3000 Suite 706 Newport Beach. CA 92660 Silver Spring. Maryland 20910 (714) 476-3650 (301) 587-2088 FAX (301) 587-2086 TUT 001 0700 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................... 1 2.0 LOCATION AND HVDROGEOLOGIC BACKGROUND ............. 3 2.1 LOCATION AND PURPOSE OF STUDY .............. 3 2.2 REGIONAL GEOLOGY ..................... 6 2.3 REGIONAL HYDROLOGY .................... 6 3.0 METHODS OF STUDY ....................... 8 3.1 SOIL GAS SURVEY ..................... 8 3.2 AUXILIARY HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES ............. 11 4.0 RESULTS OF SOIL GAS SURVEY .................. 12 4.1 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS .................. 12 4.1.1 Service Station Site ............... 16 4.1.2 Other Areas With Hydrocarbon Concentration Above Background Levels ................. 16 4.2 CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS ................. 21 5.0 PROBABLE MIGRATION PATHWAYS .................. 25 5.1 GROUND-WATER DATA .................... 25 5.2 BEDROCK FRACTURE SYSTEMS ................. 25 6.0 CONCLUSIONS .......................... 28 7.0 REFERENCES CITED ....................... 30 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 2-1 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF TUTU SERVICE STATION, ST. THOMAS .............. 4 FIGURE 2-2 MAP OF CENTRAL TUTU AREA, ST. THOMAS, SHOWING TUTU SERVICE STATION AND NEARBY FACILITIES ....... 5 FIGURE 4-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL GAS ON TUTU SERVICE STATION SITE ......... 17 FIGURE 4-2 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL GAS IN THE TUTU AREA, UPPER TURPENTINE RUN BASIN ....................... 18 FIGURE 4-3 CONTOURS OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL GAS, TUTU AREA, UPPER TURPENTINE RUN BASIN ............... 19 FIGURE 4-4 CONCENTRATIONS OF PCE IN SOIL GAS IN THE TUTU AREA, UPPER TURPENTINE RUN BASIN ......... 22 FIGURE 5-1 ORIENTATIONS OF MAJOR FRACTURE SYSTEMS IN THE TUTU AREA, UPPER TURPENTINE RUN BASIN ......... 27 TUT OOi O7O.1 1.1 r • LIST OF TABLES TABLE 4-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN f SOIL GAS, TUTU AREA ................... 13 I . TABLE 4-2 CONCENTRATIONS OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL GAS, TUTU AREA ................. 23 ' r* LIST OF APPENDICES I ,, APPENDIX A TRACER RESEARCH CORPORATION REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS ! APPENDIX B FIELD SYSTEM QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT OF OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES • '-" 001 07O2 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During November 1987, Geosclence Consultants, Ltd. (GCL) conducted a soil gas Investigation In the vicinity of the Tutu service station of Texaco Caribbean, Inc., In St. Thomas, U. S. Virgin Islands. The survey results show a zone of significantly elevated total hydrocarbon concentrations (up to 690,000 mlcrograms per liter [ug/1] as benzene) In soil gas beneath the southwestern part of the service station site and beneath adjacent roadways west and south of the station. These values Indicate the presence of hydrocarbons within the unsaturated soil zone. Another zone of moderately high soil gas total hydrocarbon values (up to 2,600 ug/1) was found 300 to 800 feet southwest of the station, within a topographic low beneath the southern part of the Four Winds Shopping Center parking lot. Moderately elevated total hydro-carbon values (up to r' 3,000 ug/1) were also found adjacent to an Esso service station near the southern end of the Four Winds Shopping Center parking lot. Soil gas ' hydrocarbons In these areas are probably a result of vaporization from i hydrocarbons present In ground water. r •**—' ' A topographically high area around Tlllett Gardens, an area of small shops, In which a relatively great depth to ground water (about 25 feet) and shallow depth to bedrock (about 5 feet) prevented adequate soil gas analysis, lies between the two mapped zones of elevated hydrocarbon values. Based on the soil gas analysis alone, It Is therefore Impossible to determine with certainty whether the two zones are parts of a single hydrocarbon plume or constitute two separate plumes. The presence of benzene, toluene and other hydrocarbons In the Tlllett water well, which Is located between the two zones, Indicates that these compounds are ; present In ground water 1n at least part of the area where soil gas mapping was not feasible. r • GCL also performed analyses for chlorinated compounds In soil gas at •'•' selected points in the vicinity of the Tutu service station and Tlllett Gardens. Measurable concentrations of tetrachloroethylenef (PCJE) were found at all points sampled for chlorinated compounds, with the highest i. concentrations In soil gas near the LAGA building northeast of the Tutu 1 i •' 4- TUT 001 V i service station. The LAGA building, where PCE Is known to have been used extensively In the past, Is a possible source of the chlorinated hydro- carbons. TUT O0.1 07O4 — 2.0 LOCATION AND HYDR06EOLOGIC MOCfittUND 2.1 LOCATION AND PURPOSE OF STUDY During November 1987, Geosclence Consultants LTD. (CCL) conducted a soil gas survey In the vicinity of the Tutu service station of Texaco Carib- bean, Inc. The purpose of the survey was to determine the range and spatial distribution of hydrocarbons present In the soil gas at the service station site, and to Mp the approximate extent of any hydrocar- bon pi we that Might be encountered during the survey. r— The Tutu service station Is located at 18*20'3r North, 64*53'14* West, In Anna's Retreat Estate, St. Thews, U. S. Virgin Islands (Figure 2-1). The station Is on the northeast corner of the Intersection of Highway 38 and Highway 384, on the eastern slope of the upper Turpentine Run basin. Nearby facilities Include an auto parts store and garage north of the station, a fire station and the LAGA building (formerly a cloth Manufac- turing plant, now a public schools Maintenance facility) uphill to the northeast of the station, and Illicit Gardens, a courtyard of snail shops '- and a restaurant, south of the station (Figure 2-2). The Four Hinds 1 Shopping Center lies In a topographically low area along the axis of the upper Turpentine Run basin, west of the Tutu service station and Tlllett Gardens. * . Elevated concentrations of hydrocarbons, Including benzene, toluene, and several chlorinated compounds, have been detected in water wells in the upper Turpentine Run basin (Geraghty and Miller, 1983, p. 73-74). The highest reported concentrations of benzene and toluene have been found in water froM the Tlllett well, located 250 feet south of the Texaco station and 300 feet northeast of an Esso service station (Figure 2-2). In ,. August 1987, water samples from the Tlllett well contained 1300 to 1400 parts per billion (ppb) of benzene and approximately 33 to 56 ppb of toluene (C. Oolan, EPA Region II, written communication). High con- centrations of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and other chlorinated compounds have also been found In the Tlllett well. T ' i TUT O01 O7OS 64*54'W 64*53'W L . SSSSv.V - !Jg£t-TUTU SERVICE STATION >JB «r». i.x. WMifP -18*21' 18*20'l -18*19'N Base from USGS Eastern St.Thomas 7.5 minute quadrangle. TUT OOi 07O6 FIGURE 2-1 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF TUTU SERVICE STATION, ST.THOMAS. --.*>?• RAMSAY MOTORS AUTO REPAIR GARA6ES RETAINING WALL FENCE LINE (APPRO!) FOUR WINDS SHOPPING CENTER TILLETT GARDENS AND SMALL SHOPS ©TILIETT WELL (SMALL BUSINESSES AND HOUSING IN THIS AREA NOT SHOWN) (TELEPHONE COMPANY) SERVICE STATION AND AUTO REPAIR L FIGURE 2-2 MAP OF CENTRAL TUTU AREA. ST.THOMAS. SHOWING TEXACO TUTU SERVICE STATION AND NEARBY FACILITIES. TUT GOI O7O7 2.2 REGIONAL 6EOL06Y The llthology of the Virgin Islands consists domlnantly of volcanic rocks, Including splines (albltlzed basalts), ktratophyras (extrusive Igneous rocks containing alblte and Mflc Minerals), andesites, and vol- canic breccias and conglomerates derived fro* the Igneous rocks. The Loulsenhoj Formation, which comprises the bedrock Material throughout the upper Turpentine Run basin, consists domlnantly of auglte andeslte tuff and associated volcanic breccias (Donnelly, 1966). The Loulsenhoj Formation Is tentatively dated as Alblan (late Early Cretaceous) In age (Donnelly, 1966). The Loulsenhoj Formation rocks In the vicinity of Tutu have been extensively deformed and fractured by tectonic activity during Late Cretaceous and Tertiary time. 2.3 REGIONAL HYDROLOGY The upper Turpentine Run basin contains one of the most productive and heavily used aquifers on the Island of St. Thomas. Stevens and others (1981) list 26 water wells In the Tutu area, and new wells have been completed since their report was prepared. In 1983, Geraghty and Miller estimated that 'current pumpage 1n the upper basin my approach or exceed the estimated safe yield of 300,000 gpd [gallons per day] calculated by the USGS [U. S. Geological Survey]' (p. 68). Ground water pumped from the upper Turpentine Run basin Is derived primarily from fracture zones In the underlying Loulsenhoj bedrock. To assure adequate supply, wells In the basin are commly drilled to depths of 100 feet or more, although the water table Is generally no more than 20 to 30 feet deep In the central part of the basin. Significant drawdowns occur In many wells due to pumping and seasonal water table fluctuations. Ground water 1n the upper Turpentine Run basin contains total dissolved solids (TOS) of 700 to 1,800 milligrams per liter (mg/1), consisting domlnantly of bicarbonate, sodium and chloride (Geraghty and Miller, •- 1983, p. 73, 76). Limited data from deep wells suggests that TOS ;. concentration tends to Increase with depth 1n the aquifer (Geraghty and r • & ; TUT 001 U708 i .. I' Miller, 1983). Geraghty and M1ll,r also report nitrate crantratlons In excess of 10 «g/l (as nitrogen) fro. Virgin Islands Housing Authority (VIHA) wells 1 and 2, which are located approximately 800 feet northeast of the Tutu station, and elevated levels of chlorinated hydrocarbons In well VIHA-1. i » ! TUT 001 O709 I r i i: 3.0 METHODS OF STUDY I Work performed by CCL at the Tutu service station site to date has Included a preliminary site Investigation, a soil gas survey, and limited hydrogeologlc studies as judged appropriate for Interpretation of the soil gas data. The results of the preliminary site Investigation were reported In Section 3.3 of the Work Plan for Soil Gas Survey, Texaco Service Station, Tutu, St. Thomas, U. S. Virgin Islands, and were used In preparation of that work plan. The methods and results of the soil gas survey and associated hydrogeologlc studies are described 1n this report. 3.1 SOIL GAS SURVEY The soil gas survey at the Tutu site was conducted during November 2- 18, 1987. This task consisted of soil gas sampling at points on the service station site and 1n nearby areas, and on-site analysis of the soil gas for selected hydrocarbons using a gas chromatograph (GC) owned and operated by Tracer Research Corporation (Tracer) of Tucson, Arizona. The gas chromatograph was equipped with detectors capable of Identifying total and aromatic hydrocarbons and halogenated compounds, using flame lonlzatlon detector (FID) and electron capture detector (ECO) techniques. Soil gas sampling and analysis were performed as described In the Work Plan for Soil Gas Survey and Quality Assurance Project Plan for Soil Gas t Survey dated October 1987, as approved by and with amendments requested by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II (USEPA) and the ' Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) during '- discussions In the field. • • The sampling and analysis were conducted In accordance with standardized ^ procedures which have been used by GCL and Tracer at numerous sites. Soil gas samples were collected by driving a 2-cm diameter hollow galvanized steel probe to the sampling depth and evacuating 5 to 10 * * liters of soil gas from Immediately above the drive point with a vacuum " pump. A syringe was Inserted through the slUcone evacuation line to collect a 10-mHliliter gas sample for Immediate on-slte analysis. " Withdrawal of the sample from the evacuation line and Us Injection and l- analysis In the GC were performed by an experienced Tracer chemist. I • TUT 001 0710 The Initial soil gas sampling grid consisted of 20 points located on the service station property, and 3 points located north and east of the station which were selected In order to define background hydrocarbon values. Staples at each point were taken fro* a depth of 5 feet below the ground surface and fro* the greatest depth achievable by hand driving of the probe, If greater than 5 feet. Staples were analyzed for total hydrocarbons, excluding Methane. Since the Methane peak on the chromatogram nonully Includes the peaks of ethane and propane as well, the resulting "total hydrocarbon" values thus Include only concentrations of Molecules containing 4 or more carbon atoms, which typically comprise the «ajor constituents of commercial gasoline and similar petroleum products. Additionally, an effort was made to quantify the amounts of benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (BTEX) In the soil gas; however, it was found that the OY-101 column employed for the FID work failed In most cases to distinguish the Individual BTEX constituents. The OV-101 column has been used by 6CL and Tracer In numerous soil gas Investigations, and In previous cases has adequately defined all BTEX constituents. Because a zone of high hydrocarbon values was Identified In the south* western portion of the station site, the sampling grid was extended to the west and south In order to determine the extent of the hydrocarbon plume. Due to the need to avoid water lines, sewer lines, underground electrical lines, and other cultural features, the points of the extended grid were not spaced as regularly as had been anticipated in the work plan. Probes were driven to the greatest depth attainable, which was generally about 5 feet, and a single sample was taken from the maximum depth achieved at each point. The sampling grid was extended southward and westward to the southern part of the Four Winds Shopping Center parking lot (see Section 4.1.2 of this report). Samples were analyzed for total hydrocarbons and BTEX using the OV-101 column. During the last few days of the hydrocarbon survey, the USEPA representa- tlve at the site requested that another column be employed In an attempt to better quantify individual BTEX constituents in the soil gas. Texaco 9 ' -JUT 001 0711 Caribbean concurred with the request, and discussions were held with chemists fro* Tracer and fro* Caap Dresser and NcKoe Federal Programs Corporation (COM-FPC) to Identify an appropriate colon. The Carbopak AT-1000 coluan, a much slowed coluan than the OV-101, was selected. During calibration of the system, It became apparent that the full-length AT-1000 col urn was unsuitable for field use because of Us excessive retention time. The AT-1000 column required as much as an hour to analyze one sample, as compared with about 5 minutes for the OV-101. After a few attests, the coluan was cut to a length of 1.5 feet (fro* Its original 6-foot length), which shortened the run tiat to about 15 •Inutes, and was used to analyze a single staple taken froa the vicinity of the underground storage tanks (USTs) at the Tutu service station. The column proved capable of quantifying benzene at this location, but toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene, If present, were still undeterminable due to Interference by other peaks on the chroaatograa. Due to the excessive run times required to obtain results that were little better than those obtained with the OV-101, no further atteepts were aide to use the AT-1000 coluan. The soil gas survey 1$ Intended as a preliminary screening tool to define the approximate extent of any hydrocarbons Identified In the soil zone. The use of total hydrocarbon values Is adequate to perform that task. Although chlorinated compounds in significant quantities were considered unlikely to have resulted from activities at the Tutu service station, their presence In ground water is a matter of concern. GCL therefore conducted a limited soil gas sampling program which was Intended to determine whether these compounds could have come from the Texaco station. Sampling for 6 chlorinated hydrocarbons was performed at 9 points near the Tutu station and upgradient from the Tlllett water well, 1n which some of the compounds have been detected. Analyses were performed using the electron capture detector. The soil gas sample collection procedure was identical to that used In sampling for petroleum components. 10 001 0712 3.2 AUXILIARY HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES During the soil gas survey, GCL also conducted H.1Ud Investigations into the local hydrogeologic setting in order to better define potential flow paths of hydrocarbons In the subsurface. GCL hydrogeologlsts •easured static water level In wells close to the Tutu site, determined •Jor fracture orientations In nearby exposures of bedrock, and recorded other topographic and geologic data relevant to potential migration pathways. 11 TUT OOl O713 4.0 RESULTS OF SOIL GAS SURVEY 4.1 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS The results of FID analyses for petroleum hydrocarbons for each soil gas point analyzed are presented In Table 4-1. Copies of all results, as recorded and supplied by the on-site chemist, are Included 1n Appendix A of this report. Copies of chromatograms annotated by the en-site chemist will be Bade available, as required, In a supplement to this report. Background concentrations were established based on analyses at three points (Background 1, Background 2, and the Drift Point) located north and northeast of the station. These points were 1n areas considered unlikely to be affected by any hydrocarbons which Bight have resulted froB activities at the station. Total hydrocarbon concentrations In these locations ranged from <0.01 ug/1 to 0.9 ug/1. At the Drift Point, repeat samples were taken dally by Inserting separate soil gas probes within an area of less than 100 square feet, to determine whether soil gas values varied significantly over time. Dally samples taken at the Drift Point varied between 0.1 and 0.9 ug/1, with the highest value recorded at a depth of 4 feet, which was achieved on only one day. For drift samples taken at depths of 2 to 2.S feet, total hydrocarbon concentrations varied from 0.1 to 0.4 ug/1, Indicating temporal variation by up to a factor of 4 In soil gas hydrocarbon values. The soil gas survey Identified three zones In which concentrations of total hydrocarbons (excluding methane) were significantly In excess of background concentrations. These were: • the southwestern portion of the Tutu station site and the adjacent roadways • the southern part of the Four Winds Shopping Center parking lot • adjacent to the Esso service station at the southern end of the Four Winds parking lot It was not possible to verify with certainty whether these three zones 1n fact represent portions of the same hydrocarbon plume, or whether they 12 TUT 001 0714 TABLE 4-1 —-"-—«•«•• in*™* wr rciNUUHJI (All concentration v LOCATION OCPTH DATE •f»mf Oaekground 1 S 11/08/87 Background 2 4 11/08/87 A'! 5 11/04/87 A-2 A-2 A-2A A-2A A-3 A-3.5 A-4 A-4 B-l 8-2 8-2 | B-3 8-3 B-3.S 8-4 B-4-C B-4-C B-4-C C-l C-2 C-3 C-4 C-4 0-1 4 0-2 t 0-3 0-4 F-l 4 F-l F-2 4 F-3 6 F-4 S S 11/04/07 11/04/07 ll/OS/07 ll/OS/87 ll/OS/07 ll/OS/07 11/05/87 ll/OS/87 11/04/07 11/04/87 11/04/87 11/04/07 11/04/87 11/04/87 11/04/07 11/05/87 11/08/07 11/06/87 11/05/07 ll/OS/87 11/05/87 11/04/07 11/04/07 11/05/07 11/05/87 ll/OS/07 11/04/87 11/10/87 11/10/87 11/10/87 11/10/87 11/10/87 «0.01 «0.01 «230 1 1 «0.01III «0.01III 1 1I 1 •0.02 «0.01 <0.01 •0.01I 1 1 <0.00 <0.0 <0.01 1 <0.01 <0.09 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 M NTDRQ •JUMbll IQUfK «0.01 «0.01 «288II <8.81 «13 «13 «13 «0.01 «0.3 «S10II 1I <28 <0.02 <0.01 «O.OI •0.01 «I30 <130 <o.s <A 1 *»•! <1 <0.01 «o.s «0.01 0.5 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 CARBON! Mcwogrsjn cnm. BCIZEJK «fl nf *9»9€ «• A> %V.VC «200 <tM ^*4iWf «2M «0.01 •14 «14 «14 <0.01 <0.3 •570 <280 •280 <200 4.000 ^§1WHP <28 •0.03 «0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <130 <140 <0.6 <A 1 ^w«4 «1 <0.01 <0.6 «0.01 <0.1 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 tMSOIL »P4WBt« moc$ «t.M «0.0l «no «MO «MO 4.01 «13 «U «U <• •! "•••• <«.3 <S30 f-mfm *no «260 <280 «no <27 ««.03 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <130 <130 <o.s <0.1 «1 <0.01 <o.s <0.01 • • <0.1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 I • Interference with adjacent peaks TOTAL (WITHOUT CM) 0.2 <0.01 30.000 110.000 800,000 <0.01 7.800 4.000 3.800 «0.01 88 610.000 280.000 220.000 35.000 120.000 6.400 «0.02 0.1 <0.01 O.S 130.000 72.000 1.000 <0.09 1.700 0 1.000 <0.01 4 0.06 <0.02 0.07 0.4 0.2 TEXC\TABLE4-1.PIW 13 001 071! 20-0 2 S >'0 C 01 ro ot 20-0> 20'_0» 0*0 ocz 20'0> 20'0> 20'0> tO'0» roi 02 OOO'I 2'0 cc It» OOO'C £ 0» 021 000'2 20'0> 2C'C> 20'0> 20'0> 20'0> 20'0> WO* 20'0> 20*0> 20*0» W0> ro> 20'0> io-o» £0'0> C0'0> WO* f» co-o> SS'0» to-o> cro> n» 20'0» rt» S'0> t» 20'0» C0*0> to*o> zo*o> wo> Z0'0> wo> wo> 10'0> (NOJAOMIM) 1V101 OO1U 20'0» 20'0> 10'0> C0'0> C0'0> C0'0» t» wo» C0'0> to-o* C0'0» M» »'0> ro> n-o» »'0> co*o» C0'0> C0'0» anzm •UHU w'0> £0/21/11 »'0» £0/21/11 W0> £0/60/11 W'0> £0/60/11 »'0> £0/60/11 W0> £0/60/11 »'0> £0/00/11 »'0> £0/60/11 »'0> £0/00/11 »'0> £0/00/11 »'0> £0/00/11 *'0> £0/00/11 »'0> £0/60/11 10'0» C0'0> S* £0*0 WO* 20'0» ro» S'0> 0* 20'0» n-o> C0'0» I0'0» 20-0> wo> 20'0» I 2o-o> I 20-0 >'0 I I zro» /l/M/It M/N/1I /t/M/tl rt/CI/U CT/C1/I1 £0/21/11 £0/21/11 £0/11/11 £0/11/11 /o/ti/n «/OT/tI £t/B1/11 £1/01/11 S't S'S s> s c s c 2 s s s S I £ S £ S 0 0 0 s S'C s 0 S'2 2 S S S C » S 5 2 0 S C 0 S'S S I UVO HW30 SI-1 H-l tl-1 21-1 11-1 01-1 0-1 £-1 £-1 0-1 S-l e-i 2-1 2-1 1-1 1-1 22-J 12-J 02-d 6I-d Ot-J £1-J •l-J S1-J M-J CI-J 21-J 11-d 01-J 6-J t-i £-J 0-J S-J wiiraoi (ptnu"u°0) fc» 3W1 limtfpt iflt« w «» 9. iT , ww" * »•«* 000-21 „> ^ ,£ /f/U/" $ «-Z 000-R »S> S 2! f Wtl/It • »-Z 000> JT ^ T ! CT/If/tl « 2-2 ~ »'; CT^ • JSK • si r K K sss s,; K J'! Si 2^ "<0> »•* «wi« • J-! - K K K X X V ••• - s-: 2:: K --,. ;;:; <—M —---*-.«„„,, — are entirely separate, because llthologlc and hydrologlc conditions In the Intervening area prevented adequate soil gas analysis (stt Section 4.1.2). ' 4.1.1 Service Station Site Soil gas hydrocarbon values Measured on and Immediately adjacent to the Tutu service station site are shown In Figure 4-1. In cases where a hole was sampled at two different depths, both concentration values are shown, but the value fro* the greater depth was used In Moping the concentra- tion contours. In all holes except B-2, the deeper point yielded the higher value; 1n B-2 the values determined at 5 feet and 6.5 feet were similar. A zone of hydrocarbon concentrations significantly higher than background levels Is centered southwest of the underground storage tanks and extends southward and westward beneath the highways adjacent to the station property (Figure 4-2; Zone I, Figure 4-3). Elevated hydrocarbon con- centrations were found consistently at depths of about 5 feet and at depths of about 8 feet (maximum depth of probe penetration) In the central part of this area; however, at some points along the station * boundaries (A-4, A-2A, C-4) hydrocarbon concentrations appear to Increase significantly with depth between 4 feet and 8 feet. There was no evidence of significant hydrocarbon presence along the northern and eastern boundaries of the station site. The value of 1,700 ug/1 recorded In hole C-4 near the north boundary of the station Is probably a result of hydrocarbon vapors migrating fro* the adjacent oil separator pit. Movement of hydrocarbons east of the station area would be Inhibited by the steep southwestward topographic and water table gradients. 4.1.2 Other Areas VIth Hydrocarbon Concentration Above Background Levels An attempt was made to trace the zone of elevated hydrocarbon concentra- tlons to the south across Highway 38 from the Tutu station. However, no 16 • TUT 001 O718 XOIL SEPARATOR (4.5X0.01 (5.5) 68 (4) 0.09 (7) 1,700 5) 3,600 OFFICES]?! 0-3 (5) 0.01 C-30J5) 1.000/09 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (2.5) 1.000 POMP ISLAND D-1 /©(4.5) 8.0 (5) 130.000 HIGHWAY 38 / (5) 4.000 2-1© (5) 220,000 TUT - SAMPLE POINT - DEPTH (FEET) - TOTAL HYDROCARBONS IN ug/1 AS BENZENE 001 0719 FIGURE 4-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL GAS ON TUTU SFRVltF I. RAMSAY MOTORS *^ AUTO REPAIR CARACCS •DRJFT POINT 0.1-0.1 LINE (APPROK) FOUR WINDS SHOPPING CENTER VETERINARY CLINIC TILLETT GARDENS TILLETT WELL 43 F-10» 2.600 (SMALL BUSINESSES AND HOUSING IN THIS AREA NOT SHOWN) VITELCO (TELEPHONE COMPANY) ESSO SERVICE STATION 3,000 SAMPLE POINT AND TOTAL HYDROCARBON VALUE. VALUES LESS THAN 0.1 NOT SHOWN EXCEPT AT BACKGROUND POINTS FOR POINTS ON TEXACO SERVICE STATION SITE SEE FIGURE 4-1 FIGURE 4-2 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL GAS IN THE TUTU AREA, UPPER TURPENTINE RUN BASIN. ALL CONCENTRATIONS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER, REPORTED AS BENZENE. 18 RAMSAY MOTORS RCMIR GARA6ES FENCE LINC (APPRO*) FOUR WINDS SHOPPING CENTER (SHALL BUSINESSES AND HOUSING IN THIS AREA NOT SHOWN) ^VITELCO (TELEPHONE COMPANY) SAMPLE POINT.FOR IDENTIFICATION SEE FIGURE 4-2 APPROXIMATE CONTOUR OF EQUAL CONCENTRATION. VALUES IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER. CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 1 ORDER OF MAGNITUDE (l.t.. A FACTOR OF 10). CONTOURS DASHED WHERE POORLY CONSTRAINED BY DATA. ESSO SERVICE STATION AND AUTO REPAIR FIGURE 4-3 CONTOURS OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL GAS, TUTU AREA,UPPER TURPENTINE RUN BASIN values of hydrocarbons In excess of background levels wtrt detected 1n the area between the Tlllett well and the north boundary of the Tlllett property at Highway 36, except at points under the sidewalk and under a traffic Island (points T-3 and T-7, Figure 4-2). Topographically, the 1 northern part of the Tlllett property, southeast of the retaining wall shown 1n Figure 2-2, Is 10 to 15 feet higher than the land surface at the r 7 service station, and 1t was not possible to achieve depths greater than about 5 feet In placing the soil gas probes because of the presence of r- bedrock at that depth. Ground water 1s at a depth of about 25 to 30 .' feet beneath the Tlllett property, and thus Is 20 feet or more below the greatest depth of probe penetration. Therefore, the possible presence of petrol em hydrocarbons at depths too great to be sampled beneath the Tlllett property could not be determined. f • South of the Tlllett well, detectable concentrations of hydrocarbons ware found 1n the southern part of the Four Winds Shopping Center parking lot, 1 near the Csso station and locally along the east side of Highway 38 , (Zones II and III, Figure 4*3). Although most of the constituents i Identified appear to be petroleum components, there was some admixture of other compounds (up to about 5 ug/1 as benzene In some holes) which appear to have a different origin. Since significant concentrations of » . halogenated compounds were found In holes near this area, It Is possible that the unidentified constituents Identified by the FID represent some '' of the halogenated compounds. r « - It was possible to Identify and map Zones II and III southwestward to and r. beyond the Esso service station at the south end of the Four Winds parking lot, even though bedrock In much of the area prevented probe penetration to depths greater than about 5 feet (Figure 4-3). South and west of the Esso station, Increased soil gas hydrocarbon concentrations j were found, relative to those which were found Immediately north of the station. The soil gas survey was terminated at this location, because of u i r: 20 TUT 001 Ir I , i. r • the presence of Increased hydrocarbon concentrations probably attribut- able to a different source. Tracing of any soil gas pluae not potential- ly attributable to the Texaco station was outside the scope of the work plan. 4.2 CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS Because chlorinated hydrocarbons have been Identified In water samples from the TWett well and other wells In the Tutu area, a Halted number of soil gas points were stapled and analyzed for chlorinated compounds. These points were located In the vicinity of the Tlllett well, on and adjacent to the Texaco service station, and near the LAGA building (Figure 4-4). Samples were analyzed for: • nethylene chloride (dlchloromethane) • chloroform (trlchloromethane) r~ [ • trlchloroethane (TCA) • carbon tetrachlorlde (tetrachloromethane) 1 trlchloroethylene (TCE) • tetrachloroethylene (PCE) • r- Results of the chlorinated hydrocarbon analyses are listed In Table 4-2. i- ' • No significant concentration of any chlorinated compound was Identified ,. In hole H-9, located on the Texaco station, In the center of the known petroleum hydrocarbon plume. Nethylene chloride (6 ug/1) was Identified In soil gas beneath the property north of the Texaco service station, and TCA was Identified at several locations, with the largest value (10 ug/1) being recorded in hole H-6, south of the Tlllett well. i *~ PCE was detected 1n all nine of the holes sampled for chlorinated com- pounds. The lowest PCE concentration (0.02 ug/1) was found at the Texaco station; the highest (170 ug/1) was found adjacent to the loading dock at » .. the LAGA building. PCE was also Identified at points near the Tlllett » well, although benzene and toluene, known to exist 1n the well water, had • r J • T'UT O01 I 1 -L r - 4 . r •/L RAMSAY MOTORS AUTO REPAIR GARACCS M-9 0.02 TANKS* J RETAINING WALL VETERINARY FENCE LINE (APPRO*) FOUR MINOS SHOPPING CENTER TILLETT GARDENS © TILLETT WELL (SHALL BUSINESSES AND HOUSING IN THIS AREA NOT SHOWN) ^VITELCO (TELEPHONE COMPANY) SAMPLE POINT SHOWING IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AND PCE CONCENTRATION IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER CSSO SERVICE STATION AND AUTO REPAIR FIGURE 4-4 CONCENTRATIONS OF PCE IN SOIL GAS IN THE TUTU AREA. UPPER TURPENTINE RUN BASIN. 22 I f- TABLE 4-2 CONCENTRATIONS OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS « SOIL GAS. TUTU AREA (AM eonc«rtrttlon vti UM In mtefogram. p«r NETMTlEJtf «•« »TH DATE OUMK CNLOROFORK TCA ,0^,., TC£ „ r* H-l H-Z H-3 M-4 H-5 H-6 H-7 M-8 N-» 3 3.5 4 3.5 4 4.5 5 5 5.5 11/17/87 11/17/87 11/17/87 11/17/87 11/17/87 11/17/87 11/17/87 11/17/87 11/17/87 •0.0 •0.8 •O.OB •0.09 •0.2 •30 •0.0 8 •0.09 •0.008 •0.008 •0.0008 •0.0008 •0.001 •0.2 •0.008 •0.006 •0.0006 0.02 0.05 •0.0002 0.005 •0.0004 10 0.04 •0.002 •0.0002 •0.0005 •0.0005 •0.00005 •0.00005 •0.0001 •0.02 •0.0005 •0.0005 •0.00005 •0.004 0.5 •0.0004 •0.0004 0.05 •0.1 0.6 0.3 •0.0004 1 42 0.4 0.8 6 16 170 1 0.02 r TEXC\M8LC4-2.«i ! 1 . r 23 IT ' • TUT 001 07: r i i. r - not been detectable at the sane points. The greater volatility of the chlorinated compounds relative to the petroleum components explains the comparative ease with which they can be traced In soil gas, assuring both are present In ground water. No attempt was Mde to delineate the boundaries of any chlorinated hydrocarbon plume, which Is likely to be a really extensive. PCE has been found In water from a Virgin Islands Housing Authority well approximately 600 feet northeast of the LAGA building, as well as 1n the Tlllett well and one of the Four Hinds water wells (Geraghty and Miller, 1983, p. 74; C. Oolan, ERA Region II, written communication). A possible source of the PCE Is the LAGA building, presently used as a public schools office and service facility. The LAGA building formerly boused a cloth factory, closed about 1981, In which tetrachloroethylene (also known as perchloro- ethylene, or "perk") 1$ reported to have been used extensively. Unsub- stantiated verbal reports of local residents Indicate that the 'perk' my have been disposed of to the ground surface near the building. 24 TUT OOi 0726 i _ _- S.O PROBABLE MIGRATION PATHWAYS 5.1 GROUND-MATER DATA The water table In the upper Turpentine Run basin Is generally within 30 feet or less of the ground surface, and is Influenced by the local topography. During November 1987 the static water levels were measured by 6CL In the Tillett well and the eastern Four Winds well. The western Four Hinds r- well was not Measurable because It lacked an adequate port for Insertion '" of the water level probe. Water levels were 23.2 feet below top of casing In the Tillett well, and 14.0 feet In the eastern Four Winds well. Taking into account the difference 1n well head elevations (approximately 28 feet), this Indicates a difference of about 19 feet In water-table '' elevations at the two wells, and a water-table gradient of about 0.076, If the Four Winds well 1s assumed to be directly downgradlent from the ' Tillett well. The gradient along the valley axis aay be less than this i figure, whereas that on the eastern slope My be greater. It Is not f ._ known whether the Tillett and Four Winds wells Intersect the same [ fracture zone, or zones which are hydraullcally connected. f 5.2 BEDROCK FRACTURE SYSTEMS Most ground water in the upper Turpentine Run basin Is contained within '" fracture systems of the Louisenhoj bedrock. Only minimal flow Is expected in the matrix of this fine-grained volcanic unit. Observations r- of the soil profile, where It Is exposed In road cuts and construction excavations, Indicated that the zone of significant weathering extends to only about 6 feet below the surface In most areas, with fractured bedrock ; below that level. These observations were confirmed by the difficulty encountered in driving soil gas probes deeper than about 5 or 6 feet in * most of the study area. Consequently, the direction of local ground- I* water flow will be strongly influenced by the orientation of the bedrock fracture systems through which the water is moving. • u r 001 25 . r r * • i. Bedrock fracture orientations are not consistent throughout the upper Turpentine Run basin. Orientations aeasured on outcrops exposed west of the Four Winds Shopping center (west side of valley) and east of the Seventh-Day Advent 1$t Church and School (east side of valley) are shown schematically In Figure 5-1. There are Major fracture systeas striking north-northeast on both sides of the valley; however, those on the west side of the valley dip to the southeast, while these on the east side dip to the northwest. …