Gentle Winds Mgmt Corp. v. David Short, et al., SX-1983-CV-224 (V.I. 1983) [unpublished]
- IN THE TERRITORIAL COURT: OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX: CHRISTIANSTED GENTLE WINDS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, b Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 224/1983 ACTION TO FORECLOSE CONDOMINIUM LIEN V. DAVID SHORT and DANIELLE SHORT, Defendants. eee? eee nee eee et See ge ee ee? ea WARNER ALEXANDER, ESQ. 1B King Street Christiansted, St. Croix U. S. Virgin Islands 00820 Counsel for Plaintiff DAVID SHORT AND DANIELLE SHORT P. O. Box 1660 Kingshill, St. Croix U. S. Virgin Islands 00850 Defendants - Pro Se MEMORANDUM OPINION September 29, 1983 This is a lien foreclosure suit in which Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is a Virgin Islands Corporation which manages the Gentle Winds Condominiums located on St. Croix. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://superior.vicourts.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_12810747/File/Opinions/Archive/Gentle%20Winds%20Mgmt%20v.%20Short%20(IJS).pdf
SHA-256 a3ee59f51aefb89107aec08c34193328400bec8182bf6be01e3d4e54b7f05b15
Re-using this document
edicts of government — judicial opinions are not copyrightable by anyone. NOT 17 USC 105 (territorial court, not federal) and NOT 'rights unstated'.
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-a3ee59f51aef
Document text
- IN THE TERRITORIAL COURT: OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX: CHRISTIANSTED GENTLE WINDS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, b Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 224/1983 ACTION TO FORECLOSE CONDOMINIUM LIEN V. DAVID SHORT and DANIELLE SHORT, Defendants. eee? eee nee eee et See ge ee ee? ea WARNER ALEXANDER, ESQ. 1B King Street Christiansted, St. Croix U. S. Virgin Islands 00820 Counsel for Plaintiff DAVID SHORT AND DANIELLE SHORT P. O. Box 1660 Kingshill, St. Croix U. S. Virgin Islands 00850 Defendants - Pro Se MEMORANDUM OPINION September 29, 1983 This is a lien foreclosure suit in which Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is a Virgin Islands Corporation which manages the Gentle Winds Condominiums located on St. Croix. Defendant, David Short, ay) is a member of the Army National Guard and was placed on Active Duty in the Virgin Islands, on July}, 6.919 BT, In March, 1982 Defendants Short purchased Condominium Unit D-5 of Gentle Winds II Condominium, including ply, Defendant Danielle Short, through the appearance of defendant David Short, adopts all of the defenses urged by him asserting that they inure to her benefit by reason of her marital status. Gentle Winds v. Short CIVIL NO. 224/1983 an interest in the common areas and facilities therein. In June, 1982, in accordance with a corporate resolution adopted by its Board of Directors pursuant to 28 V.I.C. §909, 2S MAVALe Cr 5917 and] -280aV.ol.C.. 46 9.1'SF Plaintiff corporation levied a special assessment against all condominium owners for the purpose of funding the purchase of certain facilities which are located within and around the Gentle Winds Condominiums premises but which were owned by a successor in title of the original developer. Defendants allowed their monthly maintenance/special assessment account to fall in arrears, as a result of which Plaintiff filed a tien against defendants’ property on December 29, 1982. This suit was commenced to foreclose that lien and for attorneys' fees. Defendants responded to service of the Complaint upon them by sending a letter to the Court, dated April 5, 1983, generally denying liability. The Court elected to treat this letter as an answer. Upon the filing of the pending motion for summary judgment, defendants, acting pro se; filed a letter memorandum and orally argued their opposition, asserting the Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act of 1940 as a bar and further asserting that there was a difference between monthly maintenance charges and special assessments for the purpose of establishing a lien. Gentle Winds v. Short a CIVIL NO. 224/1983 : . SUMMARY JUDGMENT Summary Judgment may be granted if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. F.R.C.P. Rule 56(c). Defendants were admonished by the Court on several occasions to secure the services of a lawyer to PeRreeent their interests, yet they insisted upon pursuing the matter pro se. They are now bound by the consequences of that decision. 3: Construing the letter first filed herein by defendants as an answer, and viewing same, together with the oral argument of defendants and their letter memorandum filed in opposition to the motion, in a light most favorable to them, I must conclude that the same are an admission of the allegations of Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendants assert that they were never in arrears for monthly maintenance charges but concede that they have only partially paid the special assessment. They therefore urge that the lien which is here sought to be foreclosed was erroneously imposed because the maintenance charge and special assessment charge are different and distinct. Whether this is the fact is of no consequence since defendants admit making partial payment of the special Gentle Winds v. Short 2 CIVIL NO. 224/1983 ; assessment and therefore have ratified the same. The entire argument, however, is without merit because the alleged dissimilarity between the two charges sought to be established isa aierarence without distinction. 28 V.I.C. §901(g) (1) and (2) define both charges as common expenses which are properly charged against Condominium owners in proportion to their interest, pursuant to 28 V.I.C. §909. Defendants have offered no evidence to indicate that the conduct of the corporation in morcheeana the common area facilities was in any way ultra vires. Defendants have merely failed to contribute their proportionate share of the purchase price of these facilities because in their words. thay, believe the properties are "for all practical purposes, useless". However, no apartment owner May exempt himself from liability for his contribution towards the common expenses by waiver of the use or enjoyment of any of the common areas and facilities. 28 V.I.C. §920. Defendants have requested relief under the Soldiers' and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940. 50 U.S.C. App. §501 et seq. section 532, applicable to real estate liens, reads as follows: (1) The provisions of this section shall apply only to obligations secured by mortgage, trust deed, or other security in the nature of a mortgage upon real or per- sonal property owned by a person in military service at the commencement of the period of the military service and still so owned by him which obligations originated prior to such person's period of military service. (emphasis added). Gentle Winds v. Short CIVIL NO. 224/1983 As noted above, Defendant, David Short, was Placed on active duty in the Army National Guard on July 27, 1981. The Condominium Unit which underlies this suit was purchased on March 1, 1982, some seven months after Short's active military service had commenced. The act, therefore, has no application to him and no relief can be granted as a result of its provisions. There being no issue of disputed fact and plaintiff being entitled to judgment as a matter of law, Summary Judgment will be granted. BONO TEER: - TRWINS. S = @) Judge —~ DATED: September 29, 1983