VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

USA v. Paz et al

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Date
2020-11-10
Pages
2
Text
Native Text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HECTOR HERNANDEZ SAVCEDO, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:19‐cr‐0039 ) ) ) ) ) ORDER BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant Hector Hernandez Savcedo’s (“Savcedo”) Motion to Continue Sentencing Hearing, filed on November 8, 2020. (EFC No. 178.) Savcedo sentencing hearing currently scheduled for November 19, 2020. Savcedo, through his counsel, requests that his hearing be continued to a date after January 11, 2021, or in the alternative, to permit Savcedo to appear at the hearing via video teleconference (“VTC”). In his motion, Savcedo asserts that his attorney lives in Puerto Rico, where she homeschools her school-age children and is the “sole caretaker of her elderly parents.” Id. at 1. Savcedo argues that the incidence of COVID-19 is rising dramatically in Puerto Rico and that the District Court there has continued all in-person civil and criminal hearings until at least January 11, 2021, due to the pandemic. Given counsel’s familial circumstances, were counsel to fly to St. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_19-cr-00039/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_19-cr-00039-1.pdf

SHA-256 a6ac3d25cf6df5c5a48ba9268931bac6c8b7d1b4397435cee82b6a57abccd46b

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-a6ac3d25cf6d

Document text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HECTOR HERNANDEZ SAVCEDO, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:19‐cr‐0039 ) ) ) ) ) ORDER BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant Hector Hernandez Savcedo’s (“Savcedo”) Motion to Continue Sentencing Hearing, filed on November 8, 2020. (EFC No. 178.) Savcedo sentencing hearing currently scheduled for November 19, 2020. Savcedo, through his counsel, requests that his hearing be continued to a date after January 11, 2021, or in the alternative, to permit Savcedo to appear at the hearing via video teleconference (“VTC”). In his motion, Savcedo asserts that his attorney lives in Puerto Rico, where she homeschools her school-age children and is the “sole caretaker of her elderly parents.” Id. at 1. Savcedo argues that the incidence of COVID-19 is rising dramatically in Puerto Rico and that the District Court there has continued all in-person civil and criminal hearings until at least January 11, 2021, due to the pandemic. Given counsel’s familial circumstances, were counsel to fly to St. Thomas for Savcedo’s sentencing hearing on November 19, 2020, a 14- day quarantine would be required upon her return to Puerto Rico, preventing her from tending to her family’s daily needs during that period. Savcedo therefore requests a continuance for his sentencing hearing until at least January 11, 2021, or in the alternative, allowance for Savcedo to appear via VTC for his sentencing hearing on November 19, 2020. Ordinarily, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 43, a “defendant must be present at . . . sentencing.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 43(a)(3). However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress provided that under certain circumstances a sentencing may be conducted by video teleconference. On March 27, 2020, Congress passed the Coronavirus Case: 3:19-cr-00039-RAM-RM Document #: 179 Filed: 11/10/20 Page 1 of 2 United States v. Savcedo Case No. 3:19-cr-0039 Order Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”). Among its many provisions, the CARES Act authorizes district courts to use video teleconferencing to hold felony sentencings with the consent of the defendant after consultation with counsel. See CARES Act, § 15002(b)(2), H.R. 748, 248-49; id. § 15002 (b)(4) (“Video teleconferencing . . . authorized under paragraph . . . (2) may only take place with the consent of the defendant . . . after consultation with counsel.”). Here, there is no indication that Savcedo has consented to appearing via VTC at his sentencing hearing. However, Savcedo has articulated a basis to continue the hearing due to COVID-19 conditions. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Savcedo’s Motion to Continue Sentencing Hearing (ECF No. 178) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Savcedo’s request to appear at his sentencing hearing scheduled on November 19, 2020, by VTC is DENIED without prejudice. Savcedo’s request to continue the sentencing hearing is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that Savcedo’s sentencing hearing, currently scheduled for November 19, 2020, is hereby RESCHEDULED to January 21, 2021, at 9:00 A.M. in St. Thomas Courtroom 1. Dated: November 10, 2020 /s/_Robert A. Molloy ROBERT A. MOLLOY District Judge Case: 3:19-cr-00039-RAM-RM Document #: 179 Filed: 11/10/20 Page 2 of 2