Santos, Maria Bernarda v. Department of Homeland Security
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX MARIA BERNARDA SANTOS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL NO. 2007-0036 v. ) ) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND ) SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND ) IMMIGRATION SERVICES, AND ) MARIA ARAN, DISTRICT DIRECTOR ) OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND ) IMMIGRATION SERVICES PUERTO ) RICO, U.S. IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ) ENFORCEMENT ST. CROIX DISTRICT, ) ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBERTO ) GONZALEZ ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________ ) ORDER FINCH, J. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion to Deem Conceded Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_07-cv-00036/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_07-cv-00036-0.pdf
SHA-256 a7fadf00430a8343bb02fcc368baefb50f277e83f4220d33bf22ca833af497ff
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-a7fadf00430a
Document text
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX MARIA BERNARDA SANTOS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL NO. 2007-0036 v. ) ) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND ) SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND ) IMMIGRATION SERVICES, AND ) MARIA ARAN, DISTRICT DIRECTOR ) OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND ) IMMIGRATION SERVICES PUERTO ) RICO, U.S. IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ) ENFORCEMENT ST. CROIX DISTRICT, ) ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBERTO ) GONZALEZ ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________ ) ORDER FINCH, J. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion to Deem Conceded Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants. After careful consideration and it appearing to the Court that Plaintiff has failed to file any pleadings in opposition to Defendants’ motion, despite this Court’s grant of an extension of time in which to respond to said motion, and it further appearing that Plaintiff has failed to request any further extensions of time to file an opposition to Defendants’ Motion, and the Court not being apprised of reasons for Plaintiff’s failure to respond to Defendants’ motion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Deem Conceded Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and it is further 1 Case: 1:07-cv-00036-RLF-GWC Document #: 18 Filed: 06/03/08 Page 1 of 2 2 ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED. ENTERED this 30th day of May, 2008. ______________/s/________________________ HONORABLE RAYMOND L. FINCH U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 1:07-cv-00036-RLF-GWC Document #: 18 Filed: 06/03/08 Page 2 of 2