USA v. Ayala et al
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARACELIS N. AYALA, TURRELL THOMAS, RAHEEM MILLER Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2016-45 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Ronald Sharpe, United States Attorney Anna Alexandrovna Vlasova, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the United States of America, Joseph A. DiRuzzo, III Fuerst Ittleman David & Joseph, PL Miami, FL. For defendant Aracelis N. Ayala, Carl R. Williams Smith, Williams, PLLC St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For defendant Turrell Thomas, Yohanna M. Manning Christiansted, U.S.V.I. For defendant Raheem Miller. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is Aracelis N. Ayala’s (“Ayala”) motion to disqualify the undersigned. Case: 3:16-cr-00045-CVG-RM Document #: 99 Filed: 02/13/17 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Ayala, et al. Crim. No. 16-45 Ayala argues that the undersigned must be removed from this case because the undersigned has exceeded ten years as a judge on the District Court of the Virgin Islands. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_16-cr-00045/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_16-cr-00045-1.pdf
SHA-256 a8c7a83ce2591faa01e4414f2a82f9e8f488ae5e3d9f7a92326602f04021a387
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-a8c7a83ce259
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARACELIS N. AYALA, TURRELL THOMAS, RAHEEM MILLER Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2016-45 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Ronald Sharpe, United States Attorney Anna Alexandrovna Vlasova, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the United States of America, Joseph A. DiRuzzo, III Fuerst Ittleman David & Joseph, PL Miami, FL. For defendant Aracelis N. Ayala, Carl R. Williams Smith, Williams, PLLC St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For defendant Turrell Thomas, Yohanna M. Manning Christiansted, U.S.V.I. For defendant Raheem Miller. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is Aracelis N. Ayala’s (“Ayala”) motion to disqualify the undersigned. Case: 3:16-cr-00045-CVG-RM Document #: 99 Filed: 02/13/17 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Ayala, et al. Crim. No. 16-45 Ayala argues that the undersigned must be removed from this case because the undersigned has exceeded ten years as a judge on the District Court of the Virgin Islands. Ayala argues that the current case cannot proceed until a new judge is appointed to oversee the proceedings. The Revised Organic Act, in pertinent part, provides that the term of appointment for a judge of the District Court of the Virgin Islands is “ten years and until their successors are chosen and qualified, unless sooner removed by the President for cause.” 48 U.S.C. § 1614(a) (emphasis added). Given that context, the remedy suggested by Ayala is only possible if one were to ignore the conjunctive language “and until,” that immediately follows the words “ten years.” Of course, the Court is required to give meaning to each word in a statute and to read the statute as a whole. Tavarez v. Klingensmith, 372 F.3d 188, 190 (3d Cir. 2004). It would be verboten to do otherwise in interpreting a statute. Applying well-established principles of statutory construction to the Revised Organic Act, the statutory language is very clear. The ten-year period referred to in the Revised Organic Act is a floor for a district judge’s term. It is not a cap. See 18 U.S.C. § 1614(a). In short, the term is not finite. Indeed, only Case: 3:16-cr-00045-CVG-RM Document #: 99 Filed: 02/13/17 Page 2 of 3 United States v. Ayala, et al. Crim. No. 16-45 if a successor is chosen and qualified does the term end.1 48 U.S.C. § 1614(a). The premises considered; it is hereby ORDERED that Ayala’s motion to disqualify is DENIED. S\ CURTIS V. GÓMEZ District Judge 1 Clearly, Congress has the capacity to legislate terms of office for a finite period, as it has in other contexts. See, e.g., 26 U.S.C. § 7443(e) (“The term of office of any judge of the Tax Court shall expire 15 years after he takes office.”). Exercising its sound discretion, Congress chose not to define a finite term with respect to judges of the District Court of the Virgin Islands. Case: 3:16-cr-00045-CVG-RM Document #: 99 Filed: 02/13/17 Page 3 of 3