VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

USA v. James

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Date
2018-07-11
Pages
3
Text
Native Text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH JAMES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2017-40 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Gretchen Shappert, United States Attorney Sigrid Tejo-Sprotte, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the United States of America, Joseph A. DiRuzzo, III Ft. Lauderdale, FL For defendant Kenneth James. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the motion of Kenneth James (“James”) to disqualify the undersigned. James argues that the undersigned must be removed from this case because the undersigned has exceeded ten years as a judge on the District Court of the Virgin Islands. James argues that the current case cannot proceed until a new judge is appointed to oversee the proceedings. Case: 3:17-cr-00040-RAM-RM Document #: 53 Filed: 07/11/18 Page 1 of 3 United States v. James Crim. No. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_17-cr-00040/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_17-cr-00040-0.pdf

SHA-256 ad570f3eac0e304fe580daa4c2125accb049299f769c26acaad676bda48ed429

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-ad570f3eac0e

Document text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH JAMES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2017-40 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Gretchen Shappert, United States Attorney Sigrid Tejo-Sprotte, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the United States of America, Joseph A. DiRuzzo, III Ft. Lauderdale, FL For defendant Kenneth James. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the motion of Kenneth James (“James”) to disqualify the undersigned. James argues that the undersigned must be removed from this case because the undersigned has exceeded ten years as a judge on the District Court of the Virgin Islands. James argues that the current case cannot proceed until a new judge is appointed to oversee the proceedings. Case: 3:17-cr-00040-RAM-RM Document #: 53 Filed: 07/11/18 Page 1 of 3 United States v. James Crim. No. 17-40 Order The Revised Organic Act, in pertinent part, provides that the term of appointment for a judge of the District Court of the Virgin Islands is “ten years and until their successors are chosen and qualified, unless sooner removed by the President for cause.” 48 U.S.C. § 1614(a) (emphasis added). Given that context, the remedy suggested by James is only possible if one were to ignore the conjunctive language “and until,” that immediately follows the words “ten years.” Of course, the Court is required to give meaning to each word in a statute and to read the statute as a whole. Tavarez v. Klingensmith, 372 F.3d 188, 190 (3d Cir. 2004). It would be verboten to do otherwise in interpreting a statute. Applying well-established principles of statutory construction to the Revised Organic Act, the statutory language is very clear. The ten-year period referred to in the Revised Organic Act is a floor for a district judge’s term. It is not a cap. See 18 U.S.C. § 1614(a). In short, the term is not finite. Indeed, only if a successor is chosen and qualified does the term end.1 48 U.S.C. § 1614(a). 1 Clearly, Congress has the capacity to legislate terms of office for a finite period, as it has in other contexts. See, e.g., 26 U.S.C. § 7443(e) (“The term of office of any judge of the Tax Court shall expire 15 years after he takes office.”). Exercising its sound discretion, Congress chose not to define a finite term with respect to judges of the District Court of the Virgin Islands. Case: 3:17-cr-00040-RAM-RM Document #: 53 Filed: 07/11/18 Page 2 of 3 United States v. James Crim. No. 17-40 Order The premises considered; it is hereby ORDERED that James’s motion to disqualify docketed at ECF Number 46 is DENIED. S\ CURTIS V. GÓMEZ District Judge Case: 3:17-cr-00040-RAM-RM Document #: 53 Filed: 07/11/18 Page 3 of 3