Coyle et al v. MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS (ST. THOMAS), INC.
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN ROBERT COYLE, MICHELLE FRONTANI, Plaintiffs, v. MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS (ST. THOMAS), INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2015-22 ) ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES: Samuel H. Hall Jr. Marie E. Thomas-Griffith Hall & Griffith, P.C. St. Thomas, VI For the plaintiffs Robert Coyle and Michelle Frontani, Carl A. Beckstedt, III Michael A. Rogers Beckstedt and Associate Christiansted, VI For the defendant Marriot Ownership Resorts, Inc. JUDGMENT GÓMEZ, J. On October 13, 2016, the parties informed the Court that this action has been settled. The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties’ settlement agreement is APPROVED; it is further ORDERED that the trial setting in this matter is VACATED; it is further Case: 3:15-cv-00022-CVG-RM Document #: 223 Filed: 10/14/16 Page 1 of 2 Coyle v. Marriot Civil No. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_15-cv-00022/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_15-cv-00022-1.pdf
SHA-256 b4c012f04b659efc8996079215d3b0ac789a355f4e61347bc0815fd6617f5ab0
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-b4c012f04b65
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN ROBERT COYLE, MICHELLE FRONTANI, Plaintiffs, v. MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS (ST. THOMAS), INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2015-22 ) ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES: Samuel H. Hall Jr. Marie E. Thomas-Griffith Hall & Griffith, P.C. St. Thomas, VI For the plaintiffs Robert Coyle and Michelle Frontani, Carl A. Beckstedt, III Michael A. Rogers Beckstedt and Associate Christiansted, VI For the defendant Marriot Ownership Resorts, Inc. JUDGMENT GÓMEZ, J. On October 13, 2016, the parties informed the Court that this action has been settled. The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties’ settlement agreement is APPROVED; it is further ORDERED that the trial setting in this matter is VACATED; it is further Case: 3:15-cv-00022-CVG-RM Document #: 223 Filed: 10/14/16 Page 1 of 2 Coyle v. Marriot Civil No. 2015-22 Judgment ORDERED that all pending motions in this case are MOOT; it is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED; it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this case; and it is further ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for 30 days from the date of this Judgment to enforce the settlement agreement. S\ Curtis V. Gómez District Judge Case: 3:15-cv-00022-CVG-RM Document #: 223 Filed: 10/14/16 Page 2 of 2