DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 HELEN JAMES-STEELE, 5 5 2004-CV-123 Plaintiff, 5 v. 5 5 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Sunshine S. Benoit, Esq. ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INSPECTION THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion For Inspection (Docket No. 74). Defendant filed an opposition to said motion. The time for filing a reply has expired. Having reviewed the submissions of the parties, the Court finds that Plaintiff failed to comply with LRCi 37.1, requiring counsel for the parties to confer in good faith prior to the filing of such motion. Consequently, the Court will strike the said motion and order counsel to meet and confer. In the event the parties are unable to agree regarding the inspection of the vehicle, Plaintiff may re-file her motion. Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED: Case: 1:04-cv-00123-TJS-GWC Document #: 77 Filed: 04/17/08 Page 1 of 2 Steele-James v. Ford Motor Company 2004-CV-0123 Order Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion For Inspection 1. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_04-cv-00123/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_04-cv-00123-0.pdf
SHA-256 b6057f0826ff57b36f8e15bd30c965a838b82ae0f3d5cfd08c6cc86f46145e39
Re-using this document
A work of the United States Government. Not subject to copyright in the United States under 17 U.S.C. § 105, and therefore in the public domain from the moment it was created.
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-b6057f0826ff
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 HELEN JAMES-STEELE, 5 5 2004-CV-123 Plaintiff, 5 v. 5 5 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Sunshine S. Benoit, Esq. ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INSPECTION THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion For Inspection (Docket No. 74). Defendant filed an opposition to said motion. The time for filing a reply has expired. Having reviewed the submissions of the parties, the Court finds that Plaintiff failed to comply with LRCi 37.1, requiring counsel for the parties to confer in good faith prior to the filing of such motion. Consequently, the Court will strike the said motion and order counsel to meet and confer. In the event the parties are unable to agree regarding the inspection of the vehicle, Plaintiff may re-file her motion. Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED: Case: 1:04-cv-00123-TJS-GWC Document #: 77 Filed: 04/17/08 Page 1 of 2 Steele-James v. Ford Motor Company 2004-CV-0123 Order Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion For Inspection 1. Plaintiff’s Motion For Inspection (Docket No. 74) is STRICKEN. 2. Counsel shall meet and confer, at time and place mutually convenient, on or before Monday, April 22, 2008. 3. If, after such conference, any dispute regarding any or all of the discovery requests at issue remains, Plaintiff may re-file her motion, with a proper LRCi 37.1 certification and including the details of such conference of counsel. 4. Any failure or refusal to meet and confer or to meet and confer in good faith shall result in sanctions. ENTER: Dated: April 17, 2008 /s/ GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:04-cv-00123-TJS-GWC Document #: 77 Filed: 04/17/08 Page 2 of 2