Cromwell, Chester v. Innovative Communication, Inc. D/B/A Innovative Telephone D/B/A Vitelco
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN CHESTER CROMWELL, Plaintiff, v. INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION, INC., d/b/a INNOVATIVE TELEPHONE, d/b/a VITELCO, Defendant. ___________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2007-56 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES: Chester Cromwell P.O. Box 303297, St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. 00803 Pro se plaintiff, Innovative Communication, Inc. d/b/a Innovative Telephone d/b/a Vitelco St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Pro se defendant. ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. Upon review of the record, the Court notes that the file contains no proof of service upon, nor entry of appearance on behalf of Innovative Communication, Inc. d/b/a Innovative Telephone d/b/a Vitelco (the “Defendant”) in this matter. It does not appear that service of the complaint has been made within 120 days after the filing of the complaint on March 22, Case: 3:07-cv-00056-CVG-GWB Document #: 3 Filed: 06/29/09 Page 1 of 2 Cromwell v. Innovative Communication, Inc. d/b/a Innovative Telephone d/b/a Vitelco Civil No. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_07-cv-00056/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_07-cv-00056-0.pdf
SHA-256 ba9ed1ccfa7ea3f23539a39ed59298f449a81e3c3c68bd9dbe8e330d689098e0
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-ba9ed1ccfa7e
Document text
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN CHESTER CROMWELL, Plaintiff, v. INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION, INC., d/b/a INNOVATIVE TELEPHONE, d/b/a VITELCO, Defendant. ___________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2007-56 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES: Chester Cromwell P.O. Box 303297, St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. 00803 Pro se plaintiff, Innovative Communication, Inc. d/b/a Innovative Telephone d/b/a Vitelco St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Pro se defendant. ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. Upon review of the record, the Court notes that the file contains no proof of service upon, nor entry of appearance on behalf of Innovative Communication, Inc. d/b/a Innovative Telephone d/b/a Vitelco (the “Defendant”) in this matter. It does not appear that service of the complaint has been made within 120 days after the filing of the complaint on March 22, Case: 3:07-cv-00056-CVG-GWB Document #: 3 Filed: 06/29/09 Page 1 of 2 Cromwell v. Innovative Communication, Inc. d/b/a Innovative Telephone d/b/a Vitelco Civil No. 2007-56 Order 2007, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED, that the plaintiff shall, no later than Monday, July 13, 2009, either file proof of service on the defendants or show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of timely service; and it is further ORDERED that a failure to file proof of service or show cause by the designated deadline may result in dismissal of this action. S\ CURTIS V. GÓMEZ Chief Judge Case: 3:07-cv-00056-CVG-GWB Document #: 3 Filed: 06/29/09 Page 2 of 2