Ford v. Ophthalmic Innovations International, Inc.
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 MILVA FORD, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:08-cv-48 v. 5 5 OPHTHALMIC INNOVATIONS 5 INTERNATIONAL, INC., 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Warren B. Cole, Esq. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Compel (Docket No. 34). This order is issued without necessity of response. The Court notes that the parties failed to submit a joint stipulation pursuant LRCi 37.2(a). Counsel for Defendant certifies that he attempted to schedule a meet and confer without response from counsel for Plaintiff. Therefore, the Court will deem the motion in compliance with LRCi 37.2(c). Having reviewed the said motion, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to provide responses to discovery requests as set forth in the motion and that Defendant is entitled to Case: 1:08-cv-00048-RLF-GWC Document #: 35 Filed: 09/08/09 Page 1 of 2 Ford v. Ophthalmic Innovations Int’l, Inc. 1:08-cv-48 Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Compel such responses. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cv-00048/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cv-00048-0.pdf
SHA-256 bbc1dd8850406889438cc4fce7f84dd4ad56ffe4a896c9b4604418bee6b25c4f
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-bbc1dd885040
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 MILVA FORD, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:08-cv-48 v. 5 5 OPHTHALMIC INNOVATIONS 5 INTERNATIONAL, INC., 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Warren B. Cole, Esq. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Compel (Docket No. 34). This order is issued without necessity of response. The Court notes that the parties failed to submit a joint stipulation pursuant LRCi 37.2(a). Counsel for Defendant certifies that he attempted to schedule a meet and confer without response from counsel for Plaintiff. Therefore, the Court will deem the motion in compliance with LRCi 37.2(c). Having reviewed the said motion, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to provide responses to discovery requests as set forth in the motion and that Defendant is entitled to Case: 1:08-cv-00048-RLF-GWC Document #: 35 Filed: 09/08/09 Page 1 of 2 Ford v. Ophthalmic Innovations Int’l, Inc. 1:08-cv-48 Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Compel such responses. The Court further finds that by such failure Plaintiff has waived any objections she may have had to the said discovery. Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Compel (Docket No. 34) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff shall, within five (5) days from the date of entry of this order, serve upon counsel for Defendant her responses to all outstanding discovery requests by Defendant. 3. Plaintiff has waived any objections she may have or may have had to the discovery at issue. ENTER: Dated: September 8, 2009 /s/ George W. Cannon, Jr. GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:08-cv-00048-RLF-GWC Document #: 35 Filed: 09/08/09 Page 2 of 2