VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

Dupigny, Dale v. Colt Atlantic Services, Inc

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Island
St. Croix
Date
2007-09-11
Pages
5
Text
Native Text
Identifiers
2006-CV-0033

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 DALE DUPIGNY, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2006-CV-0033 v. 5 5 COLT ATLANTIC SERVICES. INC., 5 5 Defendant. 5 ________________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Yolan C. Brow, Esq. ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Joint Stipulation Regarding Defendant’s Motion to Compel Production of Medical Authorizations (Docket No. 39). At issue is Plaintiff’s refusal to provide Defendant with unaltered medical authorizations in the absence of a confidentiality agreement, and Defendant’s objection to the scope of Plaintiff’s proposed confidentiality agreement. Defendant fails to cite the specific offending language of Plaintiff’s proposed confidentiality agreement. Defendant finds the proposed agreement “exceedingly and unnecessarily broad, covering all nature of discovery in this matter rather than being limited to the plaintiff’s medical records.” Joint Stipulation at 3. Case: 1:06-cv-00033-AET-GWC Document #: 55 Filed: 09/11/07 Page 1 of 5 Dupigny v. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_06-cv-00033/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_06-cv-00033-0.pdf

SHA-256 bc5985f64f05a5d03d19c7c0381fb6a91d8bab1323a6f14f06b326dfb77c4baf

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-bc5985f64f05

Document text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 DALE DUPIGNY, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2006-CV-0033 v. 5 5 COLT ATLANTIC SERVICES. INC., 5 5 Defendant. 5 ________________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Yolan C. Brow, Esq. ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Joint Stipulation Regarding Defendant’s Motion to Compel Production of Medical Authorizations (Docket No. 39). At issue is Plaintiff’s refusal to provide Defendant with unaltered medical authorizations in the absence of a confidentiality agreement, and Defendant’s objection to the scope of Plaintiff’s proposed confidentiality agreement. Defendant fails to cite the specific offending language of Plaintiff’s proposed confidentiality agreement. Defendant finds the proposed agreement “exceedingly and unnecessarily broad, covering all nature of discovery in this matter rather than being limited to the plaintiff’s medical records.” Joint Stipulation at 3. Case: 1:06-cv-00033-AET-GWC Document #: 55 Filed: 09/11/07 Page 1 of 5 Dupigny v. Colt Atlantic Services, Inc. 2006-CV-0033 Order Regarding Defendant’s Motion to Compel This Court previously has held that, where a party’s physical condition is a factor or element of the party’s claims, no patient-physician privilege exists, pursuant to V.I. Code Ann. tit. 5 § 855. Section 855 codifies the physician-patient privilege in the Virgin Islands. However, subparagraph four (4) of said statute, provides, in pertinent part: “There is no privilege under this section in an action in which the condition of the patient is an element or factor of the claim or defense of the patient . . . .“ V.I. Code Ann. tit. 5 § 855(4) (1997). The plain meaning of the provision is that there is no physician-patient privilege in an action where the condition of the patient is an element or factor of the claim or defense of such patient. In other words, where the “condition” of a patient (as defined by the statute) is an element or factor of a claim or defense of that patient in a civil action, there is no physician-patient privilege in that action. Since no physician-patient privilege exists in this matter, all Plaintiff’s medical records are not privileged nor require confidential treatment. However, because alcohol and drug abuse treatment, mental health, and AIDS/HIV diagnosis and/or treatment are protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Court will order that such information be subject to a confidentiality agreement. The parties’ confidentiality agreement shall incorporate the provisions as ordered herein. Case: 1:06-cv-00033-AET-GWC Document #: 55 Filed: 09/11/07 Page 2 of 5 Dupigny v. Colt Atlantic Services, Inc. 2006-CV-0033 Order Regarding Defendant’s Motion to Compel Because Plaintiff already has produced authorizations for his employment records and financial information in the absence of a confidentiality agreement, the Court finds that he has waived his claim to confidentiality by failing to make a timely objection. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Compel Production of Medical Authorizations (Docket No. 39) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff shall, within ten (10) days, execute unaltered medical authorizations, which may include the release of information concerning alcohol and/or drug abuse treatment and/or mental health and/or AIDS- or HIV-related condition, diagnosis, and/or treatment. 3. The parties shall, within ten (10) days, execute a confidentiality agreement in accordance with the following provisions: a. Access to all alcohol and/or drug abuse treatment and/or mental health and/or AIDS- or HIV-related information shall be limited to just those attorneys and support staff directly involved in preparation of this case, and counsel for Defendant shall not allow representatives of Defendant access to the information. Case: 1:06-cv-00033-AET-GWC Document #: 55 Filed: 09/11/07 Page 3 of 5 Dupigny v. Colt Atlantic Services, Inc. 2006-CV-0033 Order Regarding Defendant’s Motion to Compel b. Counsel for Defendant may reveal the alcohol and/or drug abuse and/or mental health and/or AIDS- or HIV-related information to the minimum number of Defendant’s experts necessary to evaluate the information and prepare the case. c. All alcohol and/or drug abuse and/or mental health and/or AIDS- or HIV-related information shall be kept in separate envelopes on the front of which shall be affixed a notice stating its confidential nature, and counsel for Defendant shall inform each person to whom such information is disclosed of its confidential nature and that person's duties under the Confidentiality Agreement entered in this matter. d. At the conclusion of legal proceedings between the parties, counsel for Defendant shall return all alcohol and/or drug treatment and/or mental health and/or AIDS- or HIV-related information to Plaintiff. Case: 1:06-cv-00033-AET-GWC Document #: 55 Filed: 09/11/07 Page 4 of 5 Dupigny v. Colt Atlantic Services, Inc. 2006-CV-0033 Order Regarding Defendant’s Motion to Compel ENTER: Dated: September 11, 2007 /s/ GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:06-cv-00033-AET-GWC Document #: 55 Filed: 09/11/07 Page 5 of 5