VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Khanchandani et al

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Date
2014-04-17
Pages
5
Text
Native Text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB, Plaintiff, v. INDRUKUMAR G. KHANCHANDANI and SAKINA SADIQ, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2012–55 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: A. Jennings Stone, Esq. Bolt Nagi PC St. Thomas, VI For the plaintiff, Indrukumar G. Khanchandani Sakina Sadiq Orlando, FL Pro se defendants. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the motion of the plaintiff, Flagstar Bank, FSB, to substitute Green Tree Servicing, LLC (“Green Tree”) in the instant action against the defendants, Indrukumar G. Khanchandani (“Khanchandani”) and Sakina Sadiq (“Sadiq”), husband and wife (collectively, the “defendants”). On November 20, 2009, Khanchandani borrowed $92,000 from Flagstar Bank, FSB (“FSB”). The loan was evidenced by a Case: 3:12-cv-00055-CVG-RM Document #: 32 Filed: 04/17/14 Page 1 of 5 Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Khanchandani, et al. 12-cv-55 Order promissory note (the “Note”), which Khanchandani executed and delivered to FSB on November 20, 2009. Pursuant to the Note, Khanchandani was obligated to repay FSB in monthly installments. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_12-cv-00055/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_12-cv-00055-0.pdf

SHA-256 bdd22fe38ab3f20d848a466a4a272cd19652d5868dc321653f619480d5cdbdc4

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-bdd22fe38ab3

Document text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB, Plaintiff, v. INDRUKUMAR G. KHANCHANDANI and SAKINA SADIQ, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2012–55 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: A. Jennings Stone, Esq. Bolt Nagi PC St. Thomas, VI For the plaintiff, Indrukumar G. Khanchandani Sakina Sadiq Orlando, FL Pro se defendants. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the motion of the plaintiff, Flagstar Bank, FSB, to substitute Green Tree Servicing, LLC (“Green Tree”) in the instant action against the defendants, Indrukumar G. Khanchandani (“Khanchandani”) and Sakina Sadiq (“Sadiq”), husband and wife (collectively, the “defendants”). On November 20, 2009, Khanchandani borrowed $92,000 from Flagstar Bank, FSB (“FSB”). The loan was evidenced by a Case: 3:12-cv-00055-CVG-RM Document #: 32 Filed: 04/17/14 Page 1 of 5 Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Khanchandani, et al. 12-cv-55 Order promissory note (the “Note”), which Khanchandani executed and delivered to FSB on November 20, 2009. Pursuant to the Note, Khanchandani was obligated to repay FSB in monthly installments. Interest accrued on the loan at the rate of 5.5% each year. The Note permits FSB to accelerate payment due in the event that Khanchandani failed to make timely payments. The Note was secured by a first priority mortgage of the same date. Khanchandani and Sadiq are the record owners of property described as: Apartment E-14, The Towers Condominium, Remainder of Parcel No. 2 Estate Contant, No. 7A Southside Quarter, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands (the “Property”). Khanchandani and Sadiq executed a mortgage which secures the payment of the Note (the “Mortgage”). The Mortgage is attached to the Property. The Mortgage terms give Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), as FSB’s nominee, the right to foreclose on the Property in the event of default on the loan. The Mortgage terms also give FSB the right to receive attorney’s fees and costs in the event of foreclosure. The Mortgage was recorded at the Office of the Recorder of Deeds for St. Thomas and St. John on November 25, 2009, as document 2009009212. Khanchandani is in default under the terms and conditions of the Note and Mortgage. FSB gave notice of default to the Case: 3:12-cv-00055-CVG-RM Document #: 32 Filed: 04/17/14 Page 2 of 5 Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Khanchandani, et al. 12-cv-55 Order defendants by a letter dated February 17, 2012, which was addressed to Khanchandani at the address last given to FSB. FSB declared the entire unpaid principal with accrued interest and late fees due and payable. On or about May 22, 2012, MERS assigned its entire interest in the Property to FSB. The assignment was recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds on May 30, 2012, as document 2012003505. FSB filed the instant action for debt and foreclosure on July 30, 2012. The defendants did not answer or otherwise appear. The Clerk of Court entered default against the defendants on March 7, 2013. As of May 31, 2013, the amount due to FSB under the Mortgage was $97,959.84.1 Interest accrued at the rate of $13.48 each day thereafter. On January 3, 2014, FSB transferred servicing rights, including the right to foreclose the Mortgage, to Green Tree. (ECF No. 27-1.) On April 14, 2014, FSB filed a motion to substitute FSB with Green Tree. (ECF Nos. 25.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 provides the procedure required for substitution when an interest is transferred from a party: 1 FSB’s motion lists $97,959.84 as the amount Khanchandani owes as of May 13, 2013. An exhibit dated May 13, 2013, lists $102,806.24 as the amount Khanchandani owes. (ECF No. 18-4.) Case: 3:12-cv-00055-CVG-RM Document #: 32 Filed: 04/17/14 Page 3 of 5 Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Khanchandani, et al. 12-cv-55 Order If an interest is transferred, the action may be continued by or against the original party unless the court, on motion, orders the transferee to be substituted in the action or joined with the original party. The motion must be served as provided in Rule 25(a)(3). Fed. R. Civ. P. 25. A “Rule 25(c) decision is generally within the district court's discretion.” Luxliner P.L. Exp., Co. v. RDI/Luxliner, Inc., 13 F.3d 69, 72 (3d Cir. 1993). Before a party may be deprived of a property interest, including an interest in an ongoing lawsuit, due process requires, at a minimum, notice and an opportunity to be heard. Id., citing Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332-33 (1976). The notice requirements provided in Rule 25(a)(3) are as follows: (3) Service. A motion to substitute, together with a notice of hearing, must be served on the parties as provided in Rule 5 and on nonparties as provided in Rule 4. . . . Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a). Here, there is no record evidence that FSB served the motion to substitute on Khanchandani, Sadiq, or Green Tree. The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that FSB shall, to the extent it wishes to do so, have leave to file proof of service of the motion to substitute until May 16, 2014; it is further Case: 3:12-cv-00055-CVG-RM Document #: 32 Filed: 04/17/14 Page 4 of 5 Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Khanchandani, et al. 12-cv-55 Order ORDERED that failure to file such proof of service may result in denial of the motion to substitute; and it is further ORDERED that the bench trial previously scheduled for April 22, 2014, is RESCHEDULED to begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 21, 2014. S\ CURTIS V. GÓMEZ District Judge Case: 3:12-cv-00055-CVG-RM Document #: 32 Filed: 04/17/14 Page 5 of 5