USA v. Mangampat
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LOUIE ISON MANGAMPAT, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2019-68 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney Jennifer H Blecher, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the United States of America, Richard Coughlin, Federal Public Defender Gabriel J. Villegas, AFPD Office of the Federal Public Defender St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For Louie Ison Mangampat. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the application of Louie Ison Mangampat (“Mangampat”) to waive his speedy trial. For the reasons stated herein, the time to try this case is extended up to and including April 30, 2020. While the Speedy Trial Act requires that defendants be tried within seventy days of indictment, the Court specifically finds that extending this period would be in the best interest Case: 3:19-cr-00068-RAM-RM Document #: 55 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Mangampat Criminal No. 2019-68 Order of justice for several reasons. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_19-cr-00068/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_19-cr-00068-1.pdf
SHA-256 be4067e7b4999b590082646b1e15d4834d04c0ca648fa75042c6ace9974a439d
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-be4067e7b499
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LOUIE ISON MANGAMPAT, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2019-68 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney Jennifer H Blecher, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the United States of America, Richard Coughlin, Federal Public Defender Gabriel J. Villegas, AFPD Office of the Federal Public Defender St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For Louie Ison Mangampat. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the application of Louie Ison Mangampat (“Mangampat”) to waive his speedy trial. For the reasons stated herein, the time to try this case is extended up to and including April 30, 2020. While the Speedy Trial Act requires that defendants be tried within seventy days of indictment, the Court specifically finds that extending this period would be in the best interest Case: 3:19-cr-00068-RAM-RM Document #: 55 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Mangampat Criminal No. 2019-68 Order of justice for several reasons. First, an extension is necessary to allow Mangampat time to retain and consult with a DNA expert to properly prepare for trial. Second, Mangampat made his request with the advice and consent of counsel. Third, without an extension, Mangampat would be denied reasonable time necessary to explore plea options. Consistent with these concerns, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has recognized that “whether or not a case is ‘unusual’ or ‘complex,’ an ‘ends of justice’ continuance may in appropriate circumstances be granted.” United States v. Fields, 39 F.3d 439, 444 (3d Cir. 1994); United States v. Dota, 33 F.3d 1179(9th Cir. 1994) (“An ends of justice continuance may be justified on grounds that one side needs more time to prepare for trial [even if the] case [i]s not ‘complex.’”); see also United States v. Lattany, 982 F.2d 866, 883 (3d Cir. 1992) (“[T]he district court did not abuse its discretion when it delayed the trial to give counsel . . . opportunity to . . . decid[e] upon and prepar[e] an appropriate defense.”); United States v. Brooks, 697 F.2d 517, 522 (3d Cir. 1982) (holding there was no abuse of discretion where district court found that multiple count, multiple defendant “case was Case: 3:19-cr-00068-RAM-RM Document #: 55 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 2 of 3 United States v. Mangampat Criminal No. 2019-68 Order complex and required additional time for adequate preparation.”). The premises considered; it is hereby ORDERED that the time beginning from the date of this order granting an extension through April 30, 2020, shall be excluded in computing the time within which the trial for Mangampat must be initiated pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161. S\ Curtis V. Gómez District Judge Case: 3:19-cr-00068-RAM-RM Document #: 55 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 3 of 3