Blue Sky CZM Final Application (2)

Collection: Research & Technical Reports
Sub-shelf: dpnr.vi.gov
Kind: Research Report
Island: St. Croix
Date: 1962-03-05
Topics: Disaster Recovery
Pages: 471
Text: Native Text

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://dpnr.vi.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Blue-Sky-CZM-Final-Application-2.pdf

SHA-256 c489cde0d9e679b55dd6e0ed10d1384c55204bf48e9ca434cc5ff14f277c0e18

Re-using this document

A public record of the Government of the Virgin Islands, published by the agency itself. No copyright is asserted on it and 17 U.S.C. § 105 does not reach territorial government, so it publishes as a territorial public record.

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-c489cde0d9e6

Document text

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT For BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC Parcel 3 Long Point & Cotton Garden East End B Quarter St. Croix, USVI (08-30-2024) CZM Major Land Development Application Applicant: Blue Sky Towers III, LLC 352 Park Street, Suite 106 North Reading, Massachusetts 01864 978-291-6517 Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 2 SECTION INDEX SECTION NUMBER SECTION NAME 1.00 NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT 2.00 LOCATION OF PROJECT 3.00 ABSTRACT 4.00 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES SOUGHT BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. 5.00 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 5.01 Summary 5.02 Drawings and Maps 5.03 Project Work Plan 6.00 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND PROBABLE PROJECT IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT 6.01 Climate/Weather 6.02 Landform, Geology, and Soils 6.03 Drainage, Flooding, and Erosion Control 6.04 Fresh Water Resources 6.05 Oceanography 6.06 Marine Resources 6.07 Terrestrial Resources 6.08 Wetlands 6.09 Rare and Endangered Species 6.10 Air Quality 7.00 IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ON THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT 8.00 MITIGATION PLANS 9.00 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION 10.00 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SHORT TERM AND LONG TERM USES OF MANS ENVIRONMENT 11.00 REFERENCES Appendixes Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application APPENDIX LIST APPENDIX A : MAPS - Location Map - Vicinity Map - Survey Map: Green Piece Engineering - Survey Map: Antilles Survey Inc. OLG 1177 - Recorded Plot Map - Official Zoning Map - FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map - Water Resources Map - Sediment Reduction Program Map - Soil Survey Map APPENDIX B : MAJOR PROJECT SUMMARY - Major Project Summary (DPNR Form L&WD-4) APPENDIX C : SITE PLANS - Site Plan (Tower Tech Engineering) - Site Plan (Green Piece Engineering) APPENDIX D : OTHER SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - Lease Agreement - Easement Details (Deed 1963) - Title Search - Current Business License - Income Tax Clearance Letter - Property Tax Clearance Letter - Articles of Organization - Letter of Authorization (Officer's Certificate) - Permit Application (Form L&WD -2) - Zoning Requirements Table (Form L&WD – 3) - Major Project Summary Data (Form L&WD – 4) - Proof of Legal Interest (Form L&WD – 5) - Application for Tax Filing and Payment Status Report (Form L&WD-6) - Corporate Application Form (Form L&WD – 7) - NFIP Flood Zone Designation (Form L&WD – 8) - Certificate of Good Standing - Adjacent Ownership Certification - Elevation & Location Certification - Public Notice Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application APPENDIX F: DRAWINGS - T1: Title Sheet - GN-1: General Notes - SI-1: Existing and Proposed Site Plans - C-1: Proposed Site Plan - C-2: Proposed Compound Site Plan - C-3: Proposed Equipment Area Layout - C-4: Site Elevation & Tower Configuration - C-5: Erosion and Sediment Control Plan - C-6: Details - C-7: Details - C-8: Fence Details - C-9: Site Grounding Plan - C-10: Site Grounding Details - S-1: Monopole Plan & Details - S-2: Monopole Details - S-3: Equipment Details - S-4: Equipment Details - S-5: Antenna Mounting Details - F-1: Foundation Plan, Details, and Notes - E-1: Proposed Electrical Site Plan - E-2: Electrical Details - E-3: One Line Diagram - E-4: Electrical & Grounding Plan - E-5: Electrical & Grounding Plan APPENDIX H : PHOTOS - Photo#1: Looking north toward proposed undertaking - Photo#2: Looking north away from proposed undertaking - Photo#3: Looking east toward proposed undertaking - Photo#4: Looking east away from proposed undertaking - Photo#5: Looking south toward proposed undertaking - Photo#6: Looking south away from proposed undertaking - Photo#7: Looking west toward proposed undertaking - Photo#8: Looking west away from proposed undertaking - Photo#9: Looking north along proposed easement - Photo#10: Looking south along proposed easement - Photo#11: Looking south along proposed easement - Photo#12: Looking north along proposed easement - Photo#13: General view of proposed undertakingy APPENDIX E: WORK PLAN - Work Plan APPENDIX G: ARCHEOLOGICAL - VISHPO Clearance Letter - Phase 1 (A&B) Archeological Survey APPENDIX I : ENVIRONMENTAL - Fish & Wildlife Findings Letter - Phase I Environmental Survey Assessment Report (ESA) - Bio Survey and Endangered Species Assessment Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application APPENDIX J : FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) - FCC NEPA Summary Report Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 1.00 NAME and ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Blue Sky Towers III, LLC 352 Park Street, Suite 106 North Reading, Massachusetts 01864 2.00 LOCATION OF PROJECT Subject property, Parcel No. 3 Long Point & Cotton Garden, STX, U.S.V.I., is situated on the island of Saint Croix in Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, Eastend B Quarter, The latitude/longitude of the parcel is 17º 45’ 08.6297”, -64º 35’ 26.7075”and the elevation of the parcel is approximately 148.2 feet above mean sea level. 3ORWs3 isGHILQHGRQGreen Piece Survey dated Aug 17, 2023,and Antilles Surveys, Inc. survey 2/*ILOHQXPEHU1177 dated March 5, 1962 (See Appendix A) 2.01 LOCATION MAP (See Appendix A) 2.02 VICINITY MAP (See appendix A) $%675$&7 Blue Sky Towers III, LLCis seekingWRerect a 150-foot-tall monopole communications tower along with associated equipment, to be contained within a 60-foot by 60-foot lease area at Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix , USVI. The project shall also include a 15-foot wide by 1,285.84-foot-long access/utility easement that extends northwest connecting with East End Road. Also included is a 15-foot wide by 369.6-foot-long access/utility easement that extends southwest connecting with existing utilities. The tower and equipment will be located at Parcel 3, and, the easement connecting with East End Road shall cross over Parcel 2. Both parcels are zoned R-1 (Residential). In total the proposed project is approximately 28,431.60 square feet. The proposed tower is intended to facilitate participation by Liberty Mobile and the VI Government in the ")LUVW5HVSRQGHU1HWZRUN" (FirstNet).FirstNet is intended as a communications network dedicated to emergency responders and the public safety community. An added benefit would be enhanced network coverage for residents and visitors well.The site is currently undeveloped and covered by heavy brush. Land clearing would be limited to access/utility easements, and, the 60'x 60' fenced "compound area" where the tower and associated equipment would be located. Earth change activities would be OLPLWHGto the easements and WRZHUIRXQGDWLRQ3URSRVHGGHYHORSPHQW ZRXOGQRWDOWHUH[LVWLQJVWRUPZDWHUIORZLQDQ\VLJQLILFDQWPDQQHU The property is owned by Michael Lohman, with the tower compound area leased to Blue Sky Towers III, LLC. 1 Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 4.00 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES SOUGHT BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT The objective of the project is WRHUHFWD5 VHOIVXSSRUWLQJPRQRSROH FRPPXQLFDWLRQVWRZHURQWKHVLWH. 5.00 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT - Prior to onset of any earth change or construction work, all necessary BMPs and erosion control devices, primarily in the form of silt fences, will be installed and then maintained for the duration of the project. Additional BMPS will be installed and maintained during construction as circumstances dictate. - Compound area and easements cleared - E[FDYDWLRQUHTXLUHGWRDFFRPPRGDWHWRZHUIRXQGDWLRQ. - Cast tower foundation and equipment pads. - Erect tower and associated equipment. - &RQVWUXFW6 [6 FKDLQOLQNHQFORVHGDUHDDURXQGWRZHU - ,QVWDOODWLRQRIHOHFWULFDOVHUYLFHVDQGFRQQHFWLRQWRSXEOLFHOHFWULFXWLOLW\:$3$ 2 Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 3 5.01 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY a. Purpose of project: 7KHSXUSRVHRIWKHSURMHFWLVWRHUHFWD5 VHOIVXSSRUWLQJPRQRSROH FRPPXQLFDWLRQVWRZHURQWKHVLWHWRVXSSRUWHTXLSPHQWQHFHVVDU\IRU SDUWLFLSDWLRQLQWKH)LUVW5HVSRQGHU1HWZRUN Work on proposed project scheduled to begLn XSRQreceipt of QHFHVVDU\ permitV. Construction projected to be finished ZLWKLQthreePRQWKV from onset of work. b. Critical areas: Archeological resources: The Virgin Islands State Historical Preservation Office (VISHPO) has UHYLHZHGthe VFRSHRIZRUNUHSRUWDQGVLWHSODQVIRU proposed WRZHUSURMHFW DW Parcel 3Long Point and Cotton Garden6WCroixDQGhas indicated no objection to the proposed development. (See VISHPO Clearance Letter & Phase I- A&B Arch. Survey: Appendix G) c. Method of land clearing: /DQGFOHDULQJDFWLYLWLHVZLOOEHcarried out by earth change equipment, and will be OLPLWHGWRthe access/utility easements and a60'x60'compound DUHD. d. Provision to preserve topsoil: ,WLVQRWDQWLFLSDWHGWKDWWKHUHZLOOEHDQ\VLJQLILFDQWUHPRYDORIWRSVRLO e. Erosion and sediment control devices: All necessary BMPs and erosion control devices, primarily in the form of perimeter silt fences, shall be installed prior to the onset of work and maintained for the duration of the project. f. Earth change activities: Earth change activities will commence once all necessary BMPs and erosion control devices have been installed 3URSRVHGHDUWKFKDQJHZRUNZLOOEHOLPLWHGWRWKDWQHFHVVDU\IRUWRZHU IRXQGDWLRQDQGDFFHVVURDGAny H[FDYDWHG materials will be used as backfill for foundation and to fill any imperfections in finish grade. *LYHQWKDWDUHDRIGLVWXUEDQFHVKDOOEHVLJQLILFDQWO\OHVVWKDQRQHDFUH DSSOLFDQWZLOOQRWEHVXEPLWWLQJDQ12, 6WRUP:DWHU3ROOXWLRQ3UHYHQWLRQ 3ODQ6:333WR'315¶V'LYLVLRQRI(QYLURQPHQWDO3URWHFWLRQ Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 4 J Maintenance of erosion and sediment control measures: All temporary BMPs and erosion control measures shall be maintained for the duration of the project. K Method of storm water management: Storm water currently flows across property in a westerly direction with ultimate receiving waters being Knight Bay. Post development run-off volumes and rates should remain relatively unchanged and should not require additional management measures. L Maintenance schedule for storm water facilities: 6LOWIHQFHV WREHLQVSHFWHGZHHNO\DQGDIWHUPDMRUVWRUPHYHQWVfor IDLOXUHDV ZHOODVIRUsediment and debris DFFXPXODWLRQ M Method of sewage disposal Proposed facility shall be an unmanned site, WKXVWKHUHwill be QR QHHGIRUbathrooms or VHZDJHGLVSRVDO Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 5 5.02 SITE PLAN 5.02.01 Lot layout a. Lot area, dims, and metes & bounds Appendix C – Proposed site plan b. Set back dims c. Lot density d. Lot occupancy e. Recreational areas f. North arrow g. Site Topo h. Square footage/ lot coverage i. Square footage/ open space Appendix C – Proposed site plan Not applicable Appendix C – Proposed site plan Not applicable Appendix C – Proposed site plan Appendix C – Proposed site plan Appendix C – Proposed site plan Appendix C – Proposed site plan j. Project staging/material storage Appendix C – Proposed site plan k. Low water mark l. Filled lands m. Existing vegetation 5.02.02 Road Layout a. Road profile drawings b. Parking layouts c. Parking space calculations d. Road curb detail e. Utility easement 5.02.03 Position of Structures a. Existing/proposed structures b. Show building size c. Location of cistern d. Location of sewage disposal e. Site profile f. Garbage receptacle area g. Underground utilities NotDSSOLFDEOH Notapplicable Appendix C - Proposed site plan Appendix F - Drawings Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Appendix C – Proposed site plan Appendix C – Proposed site plan Appendix C – Proposed site plan Not applicable Not applicable Appendix F– Drawings Not applicable Not applicable 5.02.04 Septic System/Wastewater Treatment a. Setbacks Not applicable b. Septic Capacity c. Septic details d. Disposal site/effluent Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 5.02.05 Storm water Drainage D Natural/proposed drainage pattern Appendix C – Proposed site plan E c. d. TR-55 calculations Cistern capacity/roof top collection Not applicable Storm water control measures Appendix F - Drawings Appendix I – ESA Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 6 5.02.06 Storm water Facilities a. Capacity of structures Not applicable b. Cross section of design detail Not applicable c. Natural drainage off site 5.02.07 Erosion and sediment control plan a. Erosion control devices, etc. b. Construction entrance c. Final grading Appendix C – 3URSRVHGVLWHSODQ Appendix F - Drawings Appendix F – Drawings 5.02.08 d. Post construction erosion control Not applicable Landscaping Plan a. Existing 6” vegetation b. Irrigation plan and detail c. Landscaping Appendix I - ESA Not applicable Not applicable 5.02.09 d. Location of endangered species Appendix I -ESA Other required drawings a. Floor plans b. Project elevation views $SSHQGL[ F ± 'UDZLQJV Appendix F– 'UDZLQJV 5.02.10 Maps a. Recorded Parcel Map b. Easement Maps c. Official Zoning Map d. FEMA Flood Insurance Map e. Water Resources Map f. Sediment Reduction Program Map g. Soil Survey Map 5.03 PROJECT WORK PLAN a. Subprojects and activities Appendix A Appendix A Appendix A Appendix A Appendix A Appendix A Appendix A Appendix E b. Phasing of subprojects and activities Appendix E Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 7 6.0 SETTING AND PROBABLE PROJECT IMPACT ON THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 6.01 Climate/Weather The Virgin Islands experience a sub-tropical climate tempered by easterly trade winds, relatively low humidity, little seasonal temperature variation; rainy season September to November. Weather patterns are strongly affected by the Bermuda High to the north and the Equatorial Trough to the south. Climate data for US Virgin Islands Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Average high °F (°C) 86 (30) 86 (30) 86 (30) 88 (31.1) 88 (31.1) 90 (32.2) 90 (32.2) 91 (32.8) 90 (32.2) 90 (32.2) 88 (31.1) 86 (30) Average low °F (°C) 72 (22.2) 72 (22.2) 72 (22.2) 74 (23.3) 76 (24.4) 77 (25) 78 (25.6) 78 (25.6) 77 (25) 76 (24.4) 75 (23.9) 73 (22.8) Precipitation inches (mm) 1.89 (48) 1.51 (38.4) 1.52 (38.6) 2.39 (60.7) 3.36 (85.3) 2.35 (59.7) 2.42 (61.5) 3.50 (88.9) 5.34 (135.6) 5.57 (141.5) 5.28 (134.1) 2.74 (69.6) Source: [6] May 2009 Monthly Averages for Saint Thomas, VI (00801)". The Weather Channel. Probable maximum 24-hour rainfall for 10, 25, and 100-year storm events (2002 Virgin Islands Environmental Protection Handbook) FREQUENCY (years) RAINFALL (inches per 24 hour period) 10 7 25 8.5 100 11.2 6.02 Landform Geology, Soils, and Historic Land use Landform Geology United State Geological Survey (USGS), Grass Point, VI 7.5 Minute Quadrangle map indicates that regional topography generally slopes in a south- southwesterly gradient. Soils TZRsoil types are noted for Parcel 3: Cramer-VictoriaComplex(CvE) 12 to 20 percent slopes, very stony 9LFWRU\6RXWKJDWHFRPSOH[9VF 40WR7SHUFHQWVORSHVYHU\VWRQ\ +LVWRULF/DQG8VH Although the property is currently undeveloped land, some indications exist that the land may have been used previously for agricultural purposes. (See Appendix G:Phase I (A&B) Archeolgical Survey). Use of property as site of a communications tower is compliant with the property's R-1 zoning. Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 8 6.03 Drainage, Flooding, and Erosion Control According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the Virgin Island, Terr / St. Croix,S, Virgin Islands (MapNumber 7800000075G) published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) effective on April 16,2007 and exported on November 1, 2023, the proposed undertaking is not located within a 100-year floodplain. Parcel 3 Long Point & Cotton Garden, STX is shown to be located in NFIP Flood Zone Designation “X” . (See Appendix A) Zone “X” areas are those of minimal flood hazard, which are the areas outside the SFHA and higher than the elevation of the 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood. Storm water currently flows across property in a westerly direction with ultimate receiving waters being Knight%D\. Drainage, Flooding & Erosion Control: 3URSRVHGSURMHFWZLOOKDYHPLQLPDODIIHFWRQH[LVWLQJVWRUPZDWHUIORZSDWWHUQVDQGYROXPH$OO QHFHVVDU\%03VDQGHURVLRQFRQWUROGHYLFHVSULPDULO\LQWKHIRUPRISHULPHWHUVLOWIHQFHVVKDOOEH LQVWDOOHGSULRUWRWKHRQVHWRIZRUNDQGPDLQWDLQHGIRUWKHGXUDWLRQRIWKHSURMHFW 6.04 Freshwater Resources There are no fresh water resources on the property. (See Appendix I: ESA) 6.05 Oceanography There are no oceanography issues that are likely to be impacted by the project. 6.06 Marine Resources There are no marine resources at the site. 6.07 Terrestrial Resources The subject site is characterized by steep slopes and rugged terrain. The forest on site is low, single-canopy, secondary forest. This dry forest type is characteristic of the arid east end of St. Croix. It is slow growing, but with a closed canopy comprised of primarily native species. A systematic search was completed of the plants and animals of the subject property by Lotis Environmental, LLC. No rare animal or plant species protected by Virgin Islands or federal statutes were encountered.(See Appendix I: Biosurvey and Endangered Species Assessment) 6.08 Wetlands No wetland areas were identified on or adjacent to the subject property. (See Appendix I: ESA) 6.09 Rare and Endangered Species No protected animal or plant species were encountered after a complete biosurvey of the subject area. (See Appendix I: Biosurvey and Endangered Species Assessment) The easement for the proposed project does, however,begin on the landward side of East End Road approximately 140 feet south from proposed Green sea turtle critical habitat unit USVI-04 on Knight’s Bay. US Fish and Wildlife Services has made a determination that Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 9 6.10 7.00 7.01 7.02 Air Quality Proposed project will have no effect on air quality. SETTING AND PROBABLE PROJECT IMPACT ON THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT Land Use Plans The proposed use of Parcel 3 as the site of a communictions tower complies with relevant zoning restrictions for R-1 zoned properties. Adjacent parcels are zoned either Zone R-1 or Zone R-3. Visual Impacts At present, the subject property is undeveloped land covered in heavy brush. The 150' communications tower that is being proposed could potentially be perceived by adjacent property owners as having some visual impact. In order to minimize the extent to which the tower will affect adjacent property views,a self-supporting monopole type tower is being proposed rather than the larger, visually less appealing "lattice" type towers commonly used in the past. A Phase I (A&B) Archeolgical Survey identified one archaeological site of record (12VAm1-17 aka Cramer Park Site) as partially contained within the ½ mile Visual APE (Area of Potential Effect). Because of elevation differences, no direct line of vision is possible from the proposed access road or monopole compound to Cramer Park and vice versa. (See Appendix G: Phase I (A&B) Archeological Survey) 7.03 Impacts on Public Services a. Water: As the site will be unmanned, water will not be required at the site b. Sewage Treatment and Disposal: $Vthe site will be unmanned WKHUHwill beQR QHHGIRUVHZDJHWUHDWPHQWRUGLVSRVDO c. Solid Waste Disposal: As the site will be unmanned and no solid waste generated, there will be no need for solid waste disposal d. Roads, Traffic, and Parking: Proposed tower facility will be an unmanned site, therefore traffic entering and leaving the site should be limited to periodic visits by technicians and maintenance personnel. There is no expectation of any significant increase in traffic to and from the site. There will be no need for customer or employee parking. e. Electrical: Estimated monthly power usage generated by the proposed facility is 6,000 kWh. Electrical connection to public utility (WAPA) will be required. the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the green, hawksbill and leatherback sea turtles with the implementation of the conservation measures provided by IPaC. (See Appendix I: Fish & Wildlife Findings Letter, ESA, & Biosurvey and Endangered Species Assessment) Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 10 7.04 Social Impacts The tower being proposed is part of Liberty Mobile and the VI Government efforts to enhance the territory's telecommunications network and enable the VI's participation in the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet). FirstNet is a nationwide wireless broadband network, which was created by the US Congress, and is intended as a communications network dedicated to emergency responders and the public safety community. The goal of participating in the network is to transform the way the Virgin Island's fire, police, EMS, and other safety personnel communicate and share information. It is intended that the system will: - Connect first responders to the critical information they need in a highly secure manner when handling day to day operations, responding to emergencies, and supporting large events like annual Carnival Festivities. - Create an efficient communications experience for public safety personnel in agencies and jurisdictions across the territory during natural disasters, including hurricanes and tropical storms. - Enhance network coverage for first responders, residents, and visitors alike. In this manner, the proposed project will have a significant and beneficial social impact on the Virgin Islands community. 7.05 Economic Impacts The proposed project will enhance existing communication services and thus contribute to the efficiency and success of local business enterprises. Liberty Mobile and others that would potentially use the tower have local offices and employees, and their operations will also contribute to tax revenues (gross receipts, income tax, etc.) . 7.06 Impacts on Historical and Archeological Resources The Virgin Islands State Historic Preservation Office has reviewed the project and indicated no objection to the proposed development. (See Appendix G: VISHPO Project Review ) 7.07 Recreational Use Not applicable to proposed project. 7.08 Waste Disposal As the site will be unmanned, there will be no need for either sewage or solid waste disposal. Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 11 7.09 Accidental Spills Not applicable to the proposed project 7.10 Potential Adverse Effects Which Cannot Be Avoided Visual impact on surrounding properties. 8.00 MITIGATION PLANS In order to minimize the extent to which the tower will affect adjacent property views,a self-supporting monopole type tower is being proposed rather than the larger, visually less appealing "lattice" type towers commonly used in the past. 9.00 ALTERNATIVES TO PROPOSED ACTION - No action: This would negatively effect implementation of the FirstNet network in St. Croix, and hinder efforts to enhance communications service in St. Croix. - Collocation of equipment to an alternate site: Existing support structures with the capacity to accommodate the equipment intended for the new tower, and which are suitably located to allow coverage in the proposed service areas do not currently exist, thus this is not a feasible option. 10.00 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SHORT & LONG TERM USES OF MAN’S ENVIRONMENT All aspects of the proposed project are consistent with goals, regulations and policies of the Virgin Islands Government as presented in V.I.C.Z.M. Act of 1978. It is not anticipated that the proposed project will initiate any negative impacts to the the long and short term uses of the surrounding environment. 11.00 REFERENCES University of the Virgin Islands Cooperative Extension Service Virgin Islands Environmental Protection Handbook 2002 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map Map number: 7800000075G United States Department of Agriculture USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) National Cooperative Soil Survey Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 12 Government of the Virgin Islands Department of Conservation and Cultural Affairs Sediment Reduction Program Government of the Virgin Islands Department of Conservation and Cultural Affairs Water Resources Edition Government of the Virgin Islands Virgin Islands Code Title 29: Public Planning and Development Green Piece Engineering Site Survey Project #: 23X092 No. 3 Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter St. Croix, USVI 8-17-2023 Antilles Surveys, Inc.: Site Survey OLG# 1177 #3 Long Point and Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, USVI 3-5-1962 Tower Tech Drawings Blue Sky East End Tower Project #3 Long Point and Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, USVI 8-23-2024 Certifying Engineer: Elias Manguel #1579-E LOTIS Environmental Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment ASTM E1257-13 USVI-00408 Coral Bay No. 6-4 Estate Carolina, Coral Bay STJ LOTIS Job # BST-148 8-16-2022 LOTIS Environmental NEPA FCC Summary Report East End Site (USVI-00230;BST_228) Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, USVI FirstNet Web Resources www.FirstNet.gov www.commerce.gov Environmental Assessment Report #3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, St. Croix, USVI Major Land Development Application 13 Persons/firms involved or consulted in development of EAR Eduardo Bravo, PE MEM Senior Project Manger Tower Tech Engineering Puerto Rico/ USVI Mark McAllister, GC McAllister & Associates USVI Randy Hamlin Hamlin & Associates Permitting Consultants USVI Leia LaPlace-Matthew Territorial Planner Department of Planning and Natural Resources Division of Comprehensive and Coastal Zone Planning Department of Planning and Natural Resources Virgin Islands State Historic Preservation Office Project Review Letter VISHPO Senior Archeologist: David Brewer June 26, 2024 US Department of the Interior Fish & Wildlife Service Caribbean Ecological Service Field Office Project Review Letter Field Supervisor: Silmarie Padron Geographic Consulting, LLC Bio Survey and Endangered Species Assessment Plot #3, Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, USVI APPENDIX A : MAPS - Location Map - Vicinity Map - Survey Map: Green Piece Engineering - Survey Map: Antilles Survey Inc. OLG 1177 - Recorded Plot Map - Official Zoning Map - FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map - Water Resources Map - Sediment Reduction Program Map - Soil Survey Map NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End Lease Area (Far) Lease Area (Close) Aerial Images – Vicinity Maps Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End near Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, Virgin Islands 00820 Photographed 2023 Access/Utility Easement(s) OLG 1177 s//E/dzDWϭΗсϮϬϬϬĨƚ 7KH*UHHQ3LHFH(QJLQHHULQJ (QYLURQPHQW//& ϱϬϬϭͲϭϮŚĂŶĚůĞƌΖƐtŚĂƌĨ ŚƌŝƐƚŝĂŶƐƚĞĚ͕ sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐϬϬϴϮϬ WŚ͗ ϯϰϬ͘ ϳϳϴ͘ ϳϰϳϰ ǁǁǁ͘ ƚŚĞŐƌĞĞŶƉŝĞĐĞ͘ ƵƐ 352-(&7180%(5; 6 6,7(6859(< ^WZ^Zs&KZ Zd/&/d/KE^ >'E y/^d͘ hd/>/dzWK> y/^d͘ d>W /ZKE&KhE ,/^>DZ<&KhE KDWhdWK/Ed WZEddZd^Z/Wd/KE WůŽƚEŽ͘ ϯƐƚĂƚĞ>ŽŶŐWŽŝŶƚΘŽƚƚŽŶ'ĂƌĚĞŶ͕ ĂƐƚĞŶĚ YƵĂƌƚĞƌ͕ ^ƚ͘ ƌŽŝǆ͕ h^sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐ͕ ĂƐƐŚŽǁŶŽŶ DĂƉϭϭϳϳĨŝůĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞKĨĨŝĐĞŽĨƚŚĞ>ƚ͘ 'ŽǀĞƌŶŽƌ͘ 'EZ>EKd^ ϭ͘ d,/^^hZszt^WZWZz^K^W/s͕ >>͕͘ hEZd,^hWZs/^/KEK&:&&ZzdDE͕ W>^͘ Ϯ͘ d,/^W>E,^EWZWZ&KZ>zKhdEWZD/dd/E'WhZWK^^KE>z͘ ϯ͘ d,/^/^EKdKhEZz^hZsz͘ WZKWZdz>/E^^,KtEtZd<E&ZKDy/^d/E'&/>s/E͕ y/^d/E'^E W>d^K&Wh>/ZKZ͕ E/E&KZDd/KE^hWW>/dKd,^hZszKZzd,>/Ed͘ ϰ͘ sZd/>dhD/^s/sϬϵ͘ >d/dh͕ >KE'/dhE^ddW>EKKZ/Ed^͕ /&^,KtE͕ Z'/sE/EEKZd, DZ/EdhDK&ϭϵϴϯ;EϴϯͿEZZ/szKWh^^K>hd/KE^KEKEϱϮϬϬ͘ ϱ͘ &/>Yh/WDEdh^͗ dZ/D>'E^^'W^͘ ϲ͘ >>/^dE^Z,KZ/KEd>'ZKhE/^dE^E>>Z/E'^ZWhZdKZ/Kͬ h^s/Z'/E/^>E^KKZ/Ed ^z^dDhE>^^Kd,Zt/^^,KtE͘ ϳ͘ WZKWZdzKtEZ͗ D/<>K,DE ϴ͘ d,/^DW/^EKdZd/&/^hZszE,^EKdEZs/tz>K>'KsZEDEd'Ez&KZKDW>/Et/d, EzWW>/>>Es>KWDEdZ'h>d/KE^͘ ϵ͘ d,WZKWZdz>/^/EKEΗyΗ͕ WZEd/KE>&>KK/E^hZEWZK'ZD&>KK/E^hZEZdDWϳϴϬϬϬϬϬϬϳϱ'͕ dWZ/>ϭϲ͕ ϮϬϬϳE/^KEZͲϭ͘ EKZd, 'ZWdZ z Z/E ^ ^/d ZDZ^ WZ< %OXH6N\7RZHUV//& 3DUN6WUHHW 1RUWK5HDGLQJ0$ ^WZ^Zs&KZ d/d>yWd/KE^ ƵŐƵƐƚϭϳ͕ ϮϬϮϯ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ :ĞĨĨƌĞǇ>͘ ĂƚĞŵĂŶ͕ W>^ WůŽƚϯ K>'ϭϭϳϳ ϳ͘ Ϭцh^Đ ϱ ϲ ϳ ZDWůŽƚϮŽĨ DĂƚƌ͘ ϯϭ K>'ϭϭϳϳ Z/E ^ ^Khd, 'ZWdZ z ^ ϰ ϯ Ϯ ϭ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ :K/EZ^ 6 : 1 : 1 : 1 ( 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( 1 : 1 : 1 ( 1 ( 6 ( 1 : 6 ( 1 ( 6 ( 6 ( 1 ( OLG 961 7KH*UHHQ3LHFH(QJLQHHULQJ (QYLURQPHQW//& ϱϬϬϭͲϭϮŚĂŶĚůĞƌΖƐtŚĂƌĨ ŚƌŝƐƚŝĂŶƐƚĞĚ͕ sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐϬϬϴϮϬ WŚ͗ ϯϰϬ͘ ϳϳϴ͘ ϳϰϳϰ ǁǁǁ͘ ƚŚĞŐƌĞĞŶƉŝĞĐĞ͘ ƵƐ 6 6,7(6859(< >'E y/^d͘ hd/>/dzWK> y/^d͘ d>W /ZKE&KhE ,/^>DZ<&KhE KDWhdWK/Ed ^^Ehd/>/dz^DEd KEZDW>KdϮ ;ϭϰ͕ ϳϲϭ^&Ϳ ϲϬΖyϲϬΖKDWKhE >^Z;ϯ͕ ϲϬϬ^&Ϳ ϭϱϬΖZĂĚŝƵƐ WŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ ϭϱΖĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚhƚŝůŝƚǇ ĂƐĞŵĞŶƚŽŶZD WůŽƚϮ /LEHUW\0RELOH869,,QF %OXH6N\7RZHUV,,,//& 3DUN6WUHHW 1RUWK5HDGLQJ0$ ϭϱΖ^^Ehd/>/dz^DEdKEZDW>KdϮ ůůƚŚĂƚĐĞƌƚĂŝŶƉĂƌĐĞůŽĨůĂŶĚ͕ ƐŝƚƵĂƚĞŽŶƚŚĞŝƐůĂŶĚŽĨ^ĂŝŶƚƌŽŝǆŝŶƐƚĂƚĞ>ŽŶŐWŽŝŶƚΘ ŽƚƚŽŶ'ĂƌĚĞŶ͕ ĂƐƚĞŶĚYƵĂƌƚĞƌ͕ ďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĂƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐ ƌĂǁŝŶŐϭϭϳϳ͕ sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐĂĚĂƐƚƌĂůZĞĐŽƌĚƐĂƐZDWůŽƚϮŽĨDĂƚƌ͘ ϯϭ͕ ĂŶĚďĞŝŶŐ ŵŽƌĞƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌůǇĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗ ĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐĂƚĂƉŽŝŶƚĂƚƚŚĞŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞtĞƐƚĞƌŶďŽƵŶĚĂƌǇůŝŶĞŽĨƐĂŝĚZDWůŽƚϮ ĂŶĚƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶZŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲtĂǇŽĨĂƐƚĞŶĚZŽĂĚ͕ ĂƉĂǀĞĚƉƵďůŝĐƌŽĂĚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞĂůŽŶŐƐĂŝĚ ǁĞƐƚĞƌŶďŽƵŶĚĂƌǇůŝŶĞ^ϭϰΣϬϬΖϬϬΗϵϳϵ͘ ϰϱΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚĂůƐŽďĞŝŶŐŬŶŽǁŶĂƐ WŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞĚĚƌĂǁŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚsĂƌŝĂďůĞtŝĚƚŚ ĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚhƚŝůŝƚǇĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚĂůƐŽďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨWůŽƚϯ>ŽŶŐ WŽŝŶƚΘŽƚƚŽŶ'ƌŽǀĞ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϳϲΣϬϬΖϬϬΗϭϱ͘ ϬϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϭϰΣϬϬΖϬϬΗt ϵϴϴ͘ ϲϰΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶZŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲtĂǇŽĨĂƐƚĞŶĚZŽĂĚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞZŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲtĂǇ^ϰϰΣϯϬΖϮϬΗtϭϳ͘ ϱϵΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞ WŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚϭϱΖtŝĚĞĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚhƚŝůŝƚǇĂƐĞŵĞŶƚƌĞĂ͕ ƐĂŝĚĂƐĞŵĞŶƚƌĞĂĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐϭϰ͕ ϳϲϭƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚ͕ ŵŽƌĞŽƌůĞƐƐ͘ ϲϬΖǆϲϬΖKDWKhE>^Z ůůƚŚĂƚĐĞƌƚĂŝŶƉĂƌĐĞůŽĨůĂŶĚ͕ ƐŝƚƵĂƚĞŽŶƚŚĞŝƐůĂŶĚŽĨ^ĂŝŶƚƌŽŝǆŝŶƐƚĂƚĞ>ŽŶŐWŽŝŶƚΘ ŽƚƚŽŶ'ĂƌĚĞŶ͕ ĂƐƚĞŶĚYƵĂƌƚĞƌ͕ ďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĂƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐ ƌĂǁŝŶŐϭϭϳϳ͕ sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐĂĚĂƐƚƌĂůZĞĐŽƌĚƐĂƐWůŽƚϯ͕ ĂŶĚďĞŝŶŐŵŽƌĞƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌůǇ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗ ĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐĂƚĂƉŽŝŶƚŽŶƚŚĞƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞĚĚƌĂǁŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚϲϬΖǆϲϬΖ ŽŵƉŽƵŶĚ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂĂŶĚĂƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶƚŚĞsĂƌŝĂďůĞtŝĚƚŚĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚhƚŝůŝƚǇ ĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϮϵΣϰϵΖϯϴΗϮϮ͘ ϱϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞ^ϲϬΣϭϬΖϮϮΗϲϬ͘ ϬϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞ^ϮϵΣϰϵΖϯϴΗϲϬ͘ ϬϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϲϬΣϭϬΖϮϮΗϲϬ͘ ϬϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞ EϮϵΣϰϵΖϯϴΗtϯϳ͘ ϱϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞWŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚϲϬΖǆϲϬΖŽŵƉŽƵŶĚ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂ͕ ƐĂŝĚ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐϯ͕ ϲϬϬƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚ͕ ŵŽƌĞŽƌůĞƐƐ͘ 352-(&7180%(5; WůŽƚϯ K>'ϭϭϳϳ ϳ͘ Ϭцh^Đ ZDWůŽƚϮŽĨ DĂƚƌ͘ ϯϭ K>'ϭϭϳϳ WŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ sĂƌŝĂďůĞtŝĚƚŚ ĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚhƚŝůŝƚǇ ĂƐĞŵĞŶƚŽŶWůŽƚϯ ^^Ehd/>/dz^DEd KEW>Kdϯ;ϰ͕ ϰϮϭ^&Ϳ ϭϱΖ^^Ehd/>/dz^DEdKEW>Kdϯ ůůƚŚĂƚĐĞƌƚĂŝŶƉĂƌĐĞůŽĨůĂŶĚ͕ ƐŝƚƵĂƚĞŽŶƚŚĞŝƐůĂŶĚŽĨ^ĂŝŶƚƌŽŝǆŝŶƐƚĂƚĞ>ŽŶŐWŽŝŶƚΘ ŽƚƚŽŶ'ĂƌĚĞŶ͕ ĂƐƚĞŶĚYƵĂƌƚĞƌ͕ ďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĂƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐ ƌĂǁŝŶŐϭϭϳϳ͕ sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐĂĚĂƐƚƌĂůZĞĐŽƌĚƐĂƐWůŽƚϯ͕ ĂŶĚďĞŝŶŐŵŽƌĞƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌůǇ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗ ĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐĂƚĂƉŽŝŶƚĂƚƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨWůŽƚϯ>ŽŶŐWŽŝŶƚΘŽƚƚŽŶ'ƌŽǀĞ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϳϲΣϬϬΖϬϬΗϭϱ͘ ϬϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞ^ϰϭΣϰϰΖϮϯΗϮϴϴ͘ ϱϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚϲϬΖǆϲϬΖ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚĂůƐŽďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞWŽŝŶƚŽĨ ĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨƐĂŝĚϲϬΖǆϲϬΖůĞĂƐĞĂƌĞĂ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂ^ϮϵΣϰϵΖϯϴΗtϭϱ͘ ϴϭΖ ƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϰϭΣϰϰΖϮϯΗtϮϵϳ͘ ϮϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϭϰΣϬϬΖϬϬΗtϯ͘ ϳϬΖƚŽĂ ƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞWŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚsĂƌŝĂďůĞtŝĚƚŚ ĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚhƚŝůŝƚǇĂƐĞŵĞŶƚƌĞĂ͕ ƐĂŝĚĂƐĞŵĞŶƚƌĞĂĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐϰ͕ ϰϮϭƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚ͕ ŵŽƌĞ ŽƌůĞƐƐ͘ ϭϱϬΖ ϭϯϬΖ ϭϳϬΖ ϭϭϬΖ ϭϱϬΖ ϭϯϬΖ ϭϭϬΖ ϴϬΖ ϲϬΖ ϰϬΖ ϯϬΖ ϭϵϬΖ ϮϭϬΖ WŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ ϭϱΖhƚŝůŝƚǇĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ ŽŶWůŽƚϯ ϭϱΖhd/>/dz^DEd ůůƚŚĂƚĐĞƌƚĂŝŶƉĂƌĐĞůŽĨůĂŶĚ͕ ƐŝƚƵĂƚĞŽŶƚŚĞŝƐůĂŶĚŽĨ^ĂŝŶƚƌŽŝǆŝŶƐƚĂƚĞ>ŽŶŐWŽŝŶƚΘ ŽƚƚŽŶ'ĂƌĚĞŶ͕ ĂƐƚĞŶĚYƵĂƌƚĞƌ͕ ďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĂƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐ ƌĂǁŝŶŐϭϭϳϳ͕ sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐĂĚĂƐƚƌĂůZĞĐŽƌĚƐĂƐWůŽƚϯ͕ ĂŶĚďĞŝŶŐŵŽƌĞƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌůǇ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗ ĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐĂƚĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨWůŽƚϲϰƐƚĂƚĞEŽƌƚŚ 'ƌĂƉĞƚƌĞĞĂǇ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϭϬΣϬϳΖϮϴΗϯϰϭ͘ ϰϯΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞϲϬΖǆϲϬΖ ŽŵƉŽƵŶĚ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞϲϬΖǆϲϬΖŽŵƉŽƵŶĚ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂ͕ ^ϲϬΣϭϬΖϮϮΗ ϭϱ͘ ϵϯΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞ^ϭϬΣϬϳΖϮϴΗtϯϲϵ͘ ϱϲΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϭϰΣϬϬΖϬϬΗtϯϲ͘ ϳϬΖƚŽĂ ƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞWŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚϭϱΖhƚŝůŝƚǇĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚĂƐĞŵĞŶƚĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐϱ͕ ϯϯϮƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚ͕ ŵŽƌĞŽƌůĞƐƐ͘ ϭϱ͘ ϵϯΖ ϯϲ͘ ϳϬΖ EϭϬΣϬϳΖϮϴΗϯϰϭ͘ ϰϯΖ ^ϭϬΣϬϳΖϮϴΗtϯϲϵ͘ ϱϲΖ ϭϱΖhd/>/dz^DEd KEW>Kdϯ;ϱ͕ ϯϯϮ^&Ϳ sZ/>t/d,^^E hd/>/dz^DEdKEW>Kdϯ ;ϰ͕ ϰϮϭ^&Ϳ WŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ ϲϬΖyϲϬΖŽŵƉŽƵŶĚ >ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂ ϲϬΖyϲϬΖKDWKhE >^Z;ϯ͕ ϲϬϬ^&Ϳ ϭϱϬΖZĂĚŝƵƐ ϭϱϬΖ WƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ>ŝŶĞ 7KH*UHHQ3LHFH(QJLQHHULQJ (QYLURQPHQW//& ϱϬϬϭͲϭϮŚĂŶĚůĞƌΖƐtŚĂƌĨ ŚƌŝƐƚŝĂŶƐƚĞĚ͕ sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐϬϬϴϮϬ WŚ͗ ϯϰϬ͘ ϳϳϴ͘ ϳϰϳϰ ǁǁǁ͘ ƚŚĞŐƌĞĞŶƉŝĞĐĞ͘ ƵƐ 6 6,7( 6859(< >'E y/^d͘ hd/>/dzWK> y/^d͘ d>W /ZKE&KhE ,/^>DZ<&KhE KDWhdWK/Ed /LEHUW\0RELOH869,,QF %OXH6N\7RZHUV,,,//& 3DUN6WUHHW 1RUWK5HDGLQJ0$ 352-(&7180%(5; OLG 961 ϭϰϬΖ ϭϯϬΖ ϭϲϬΖ ϭϮϬΖ ϭϭϬΖ APPENDIX B : MAJOR PROJECT SUMMARY - Major Project Summary (DPNR Form L&WD-4) GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND NATURAL RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM L&WD-4 MAJOR PROJECT SUMMARY DATA Section l. A licant 1. N ame, address and telephone number of applicant. ___ B_lue._S~~wers~l......, 11 ,..--L~L-~----------------- 352 Park Street, Suite 106, North Reading , Massachusetts 01864 978-291-6517 (Ja~h1..1-) _____________ _ 2. Name, address and telephone number of owner of Property and of developer. O_wneLMichaeLLo.hman.5.0_QfLS .. ..Grapetree Bay, Cbristiaosted, St CrQix,J.lS.\ill)JIB.2.0 808-749-6540 Developer: Blue Sky Towers III._L_LC,352 Park Street. Suite 106,North Readiog, Massachusetts 01864 978-291- 3. Describe the proposed development Erection of 150' tall monopole communications tower w/ associated eguipment within a 60'x60' leased area. Project also to include construction of 15' x 1,655' of access/utility easement Section 111. Descri tion of Pro osed Develo ment 4. Name of development----=E=a=s=t -=E,_,_n=d,__ _____________ ____ _ 5. Plot No. 3 Est. Long Point & Cotton Garden 6. Zoning District:_~R_,__-~1 _____________________ _ 7. PWD Map No. 1177 8. Proposed use (residential, etc. as listed in Zoning Law): Communications tower 9. Accessory use if any __ n_/a _ ________________ ___ _ FORM L&WD-4 MAJOR PROJECT SUMMARY DATA Cont'd 10. Area of Lot(s) (acreage) --~?~a=c~r=e=s ________________ _ 11. Area covered by existing buildings (sq. ft.) ---=-º .:....:·0=--=-sg;:¡;•:..:..;ft"'-. ___________ _ 12. Area covered by proposed buildings (sq. t.) (tower base): 100 sg.ft. 13. Floor area total (tower base): 100 sq.ft. 14. Floor area ratio (B-1, 8-2 zones only) --'-n"'"'""/=ª---------------- 15. Number of buildings _ __,_(1'-'-)-'t=o-'--'w'-=e'-'-r __________________ _ 16. Number of units total n/a - -~~------------------- 17. Schedule ofunits: Person Persons Efficiencies ~□~ La...___ x 1.5 Unit ---~----- 1 bedroom _nl~-----x 2 ----~~----- 2 bedroom _n/a x 3 ----------- 3 bedroom --O x 4 -------~--- Other -~□~/a _ ____ X Total Persons _,_.,_......__ ______________ _ 18. Number of on site parking and loading spaces _1~ (u .... n .... m ......... a...,n ..... n.,,.e .... d ..... s""'"jt..,..e..,.) _______ _ 19. Maximum building height (stories/ft) _ 1_5_0_'_,_(t_o_w_e_r_h_e_i..._g_h_,_t) _________ _ 20. Adjoining property land use(s) ___ R ,__,_-1._..a""'n""d'-'R _,_-~3.__ ____________ _ ____8_djacent properties are residential. Sorne f the arcels are developed. Sorne are not. 21. Setback of building from street property line (ft)_2 .... 7.._0"'-'------------- 22. Sideyard setback (ft) __ 1_7_0' ____________________ _ 23. Rear yard setback (ft) __,3~4~5~'--------------------- 24. Density (person/acre) _ _ n--'/a:..:.__ ____________________ _ 25. Area of usable open space (sq. ft. % of lot) 304,820 sq.ft. (.03%) FORM L&WD-4 MAJOR PROJECT SUMMARY DATA Cont'd Section IV. Comments 26. Proposed Potable Water Supply (method & quality estímate gal/day) --~□~ 'ª~(..,.u~ □mann.e.d....s.i1e__1------------------------ 27. Proposed Sewage Treatment (method & quality estímate gal/day) ___ ..... n/"'"'a~(..,...unmaoned._s.i.1-+------------------------ 28. 29. 30. Proposed Salid Waste Disposal (method & quality estímate lbs/day) n/a unmanned s·te Proposed Electrical Supply (method & demand estímate KWH for single & 3 phase) 6.000 kW monthly Air Conditioning ( method & demand estímate (KWH) 31. Other Utilities_..:..;n:.:....:/a=--------------------------- 32. Other_-----'---'n:.:....:/a,,___ __________________________ _ Section V. 33. Will the development extend onto or adjoin any beach tidelands, submerged lands or public trustlands? No. 34. Will the development maintain, enhance or conflict with public access to the shoreline and along the coast? 35. 36. Developrnent will not affect existing public to shoreline and along the coast. Will the development protector provide moderate income housing opportunities? Will it displace moderate income housing? How will the development affect traffic on the coastal access roads? Development will not affect traffic along coastal access road. a. .. ~ 8/26/2024 Signature of owner or authorized agent Date James Rech, President and CEO of Blue Sky Towers 111, LLC APPENDIX C : SITE PLANS - Site Plan (Tower Tech Engineering) - Site Plan (Green Piece Engineering) PROPOSED AREA FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE WITH AN 150 FT HIGH SELF SUPPORT MONOPOLE CENTER COORDINATES LAT: 17.752397° LONG: -64.590752° X = 395,411.417 Y = 192,025.075 PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT 410.681 sqmts. = 4,420.5332 sqft. (REFER TO SURVEY PLANS FOR DETAILS) PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE AREA: COMPOUND AREA: 334.45 SQMTS. = 3,600.00 SQFT. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/64"=1'-0" 1 SI-1 PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT THROUGH REM PLOT NO. 2 1,371.342 sqmts. = 14,761.00 sqft. (REFER TO SURVEY PLANS FOR DETAILS) PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT 495.359 sqmts. = 5,332.00sqft. (REFER TO SURVEY PLANS FOR DETAILS) A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 SI-1 EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" 1 C-1 PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT 495.359 sqmts. = 5,332.00sqft. (REFER TO SURVEY PLANS FOR DETAILS) (FOR ELECTRICAL DETAILS REFER TO ELECTRICAL SHEETS) A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 C-1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSED COMPOUND SITE PLAN SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" 1 C-2 A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 C-2 PROPOSED COMPOUND SITE PLAN 6 : 1 : 1 : 1 ( 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( 1 : 1 : 1 ( 1 ( 6 ( 1 : 6 ( 1 ( 6 ( 6 ( 1 ( OLG 961 7KH*UHHQ3LHFH(QJLQHHULQJ (QYLURQPHQW//& ϱϬϬϭͲϭϮŚĂŶĚůĞƌΖƐtŚĂƌĨ ŚƌŝƐƚŝĂŶƐƚĞĚ͕ sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐϬϬϴϮϬ WŚ͗ ϯϰϬ͘ ϳϳϴ͘ ϳϰϳϰ ǁǁǁ͘ ƚŚĞŐƌĞĞŶƉŝĞĐĞ͘ ƵƐ 6 6,7(6859(< >'E y/^d͘ hd/>/dzWK> y/^d͘ d>W /ZKE&KhE ,/^>DZ<&KhE KDWhdWK/Ed ^^Ehd/>/dz^DEd KEZDW>KdϮ ;ϭϰ͕ ϳϲϭ^&Ϳ ϲϬΖyϲϬΖKDWKhE >^Z;ϯ͕ ϲϬϬ^&Ϳ ϭϱϬΖZĂĚŝƵƐ WŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ ϭϱΖĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚhƚŝůŝƚǇ ĂƐĞŵĞŶƚŽŶZD WůŽƚϮ /LEHUW\0RELOH869,,QF %OXH6N\7RZHUV,,,//& 3DUN6WUHHW 1RUWK5HDGLQJ0$ ϭϱΖ^^Ehd/>/dz^DEdKEZDW>KdϮ ůůƚŚĂƚĐĞƌƚĂŝŶƉĂƌĐĞůŽĨůĂŶĚ͕ ƐŝƚƵĂƚĞŽŶƚŚĞŝƐůĂŶĚŽĨ^ĂŝŶƚƌŽŝǆŝŶƐƚĂƚĞ>ŽŶŐWŽŝŶƚΘ ŽƚƚŽŶ'ĂƌĚĞŶ͕ ĂƐƚĞŶĚYƵĂƌƚĞƌ͕ ďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĂƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐ ƌĂǁŝŶŐϭϭϳϳ͕ sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐĂĚĂƐƚƌĂůZĞĐŽƌĚƐĂƐZDWůŽƚϮŽĨDĂƚƌ͘ ϯϭ͕ ĂŶĚďĞŝŶŐ ŵŽƌĞƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌůǇĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗ ĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐĂƚĂƉŽŝŶƚĂƚƚŚĞŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞtĞƐƚĞƌŶďŽƵŶĚĂƌǇůŝŶĞŽĨƐĂŝĚZDWůŽƚϮ ĂŶĚƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶZŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲtĂǇŽĨĂƐƚĞŶĚZŽĂĚ͕ ĂƉĂǀĞĚƉƵďůŝĐƌŽĂĚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞĂůŽŶŐƐĂŝĚ ǁĞƐƚĞƌŶďŽƵŶĚĂƌǇůŝŶĞ^ϭϰΣϬϬΖϬϬΗϵϳϵ͘ ϰϱΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚĂůƐŽďĞŝŶŐŬŶŽǁŶĂƐ WŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞĚĚƌĂǁŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚsĂƌŝĂďůĞtŝĚƚŚ ĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚhƚŝůŝƚǇĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚĂůƐŽďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨWůŽƚϯ>ŽŶŐ WŽŝŶƚΘŽƚƚŽŶ'ƌŽǀĞ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϳϲΣϬϬΖϬϬΗϭϱ͘ ϬϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϭϰΣϬϬΖϬϬΗt ϵϴϴ͘ ϲϰΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶZŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲtĂǇŽĨĂƐƚĞŶĚZŽĂĚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞZŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲtĂǇ^ϰϰΣϯϬΖϮϬΗtϭϳ͘ ϱϵΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞ WŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚϭϱΖtŝĚĞĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚhƚŝůŝƚǇĂƐĞŵĞŶƚƌĞĂ͕ ƐĂŝĚĂƐĞŵĞŶƚƌĞĂĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐϭϰ͕ ϳϲϭƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚ͕ ŵŽƌĞŽƌůĞƐƐ͘ ϲϬΖǆϲϬΖKDWKhE>^Z ůůƚŚĂƚĐĞƌƚĂŝŶƉĂƌĐĞůŽĨůĂŶĚ͕ ƐŝƚƵĂƚĞŽŶƚŚĞŝƐůĂŶĚŽĨ^ĂŝŶƚƌŽŝǆŝŶƐƚĂƚĞ>ŽŶŐWŽŝŶƚΘ ŽƚƚŽŶ'ĂƌĚĞŶ͕ ĂƐƚĞŶĚYƵĂƌƚĞƌ͕ ďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĂƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐ ƌĂǁŝŶŐϭϭϳϳ͕ sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐĂĚĂƐƚƌĂůZĞĐŽƌĚƐĂƐWůŽƚϯ͕ ĂŶĚďĞŝŶŐŵŽƌĞƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌůǇ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗ ĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐĂƚĂƉŽŝŶƚŽŶƚŚĞƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞĚĚƌĂǁŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚϲϬΖǆϲϬΖ ŽŵƉŽƵŶĚ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂĂŶĚĂƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶƚŚĞsĂƌŝĂďůĞtŝĚƚŚĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚhƚŝůŝƚǇ ĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϮϵΣϰϵΖϯϴΗϮϮ͘ ϱϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞ^ϲϬΣϭϬΖϮϮΗϲϬ͘ ϬϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞ^ϮϵΣϰϵΖϯϴΗϲϬ͘ ϬϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϲϬΣϭϬΖϮϮΗϲϬ͘ ϬϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞ EϮϵΣϰϵΖϯϴΗtϯϳ͘ ϱϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞWŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚϲϬΖǆϲϬΖŽŵƉŽƵŶĚ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂ͕ ƐĂŝĚ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐϯ͕ ϲϬϬƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚ͕ ŵŽƌĞŽƌůĞƐƐ͘ 352-(&7180%(5; WůŽƚϯ K>'ϭϭϳϳ ϳ͘ Ϭцh^Đ ZDWůŽƚϮŽĨ DĂƚƌ͘ ϯϭ K>'ϭϭϳϳ WŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ sĂƌŝĂďůĞtŝĚƚŚ ĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚhƚŝůŝƚǇ ĂƐĞŵĞŶƚŽŶWůŽƚϯ ^^Ehd/>/dz^DEd KEW>Kdϯ;ϰ͕ ϰϮϭ^&Ϳ ϭϱΖ^^Ehd/>/dz^DEdKEW>Kdϯ ůůƚŚĂƚĐĞƌƚĂŝŶƉĂƌĐĞůŽĨůĂŶĚ͕ ƐŝƚƵĂƚĞŽŶƚŚĞŝƐůĂŶĚŽĨ^ĂŝŶƚƌŽŝǆŝŶƐƚĂƚĞ>ŽŶŐWŽŝŶƚΘ ŽƚƚŽŶ'ĂƌĚĞŶ͕ ĂƐƚĞŶĚYƵĂƌƚĞƌ͕ ďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĂƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐ ƌĂǁŝŶŐϭϭϳϳ͕ sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐĂĚĂƐƚƌĂůZĞĐŽƌĚƐĂƐWůŽƚϯ͕ ĂŶĚďĞŝŶŐŵŽƌĞƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌůǇ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗ ĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐĂƚĂƉŽŝŶƚĂƚƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨWůŽƚϯ>ŽŶŐWŽŝŶƚΘŽƚƚŽŶ'ƌŽǀĞ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϳϲΣϬϬΖϬϬΗϭϱ͘ ϬϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞ^ϰϭΣϰϰΖϮϯΗϮϴϴ͘ ϱϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚϲϬΖǆϲϬΖ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚĂůƐŽďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞWŽŝŶƚŽĨ ĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨƐĂŝĚϲϬΖǆϲϬΖůĞĂƐĞĂƌĞĂ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂ^ϮϵΣϰϵΖϯϴΗtϭϱ͘ ϴϭΖ ƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϰϭΣϰϰΖϮϯΗtϮϵϳ͘ ϮϬΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϭϰΣϬϬΖϬϬΗtϯ͘ ϳϬΖƚŽĂ ƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞWŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚsĂƌŝĂďůĞtŝĚƚŚ ĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚhƚŝůŝƚǇĂƐĞŵĞŶƚƌĞĂ͕ ƐĂŝĚĂƐĞŵĞŶƚƌĞĂĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐϰ͕ ϰϮϭƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚ͕ ŵŽƌĞ ŽƌůĞƐƐ͘ ϭϱϬΖ ϭϯϬΖ ϭϳϬΖ ϭϭϬΖ ϭϱϬΖ ϭϯϬΖ ϭϭϬΖ ϴϬΖ ϲϬΖ ϰϬΖ ϯϬΖ ϭϵϬΖ ϮϭϬΖ WŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ ϭϱΖhƚŝůŝƚǇĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ ŽŶWůŽƚϯ ϭϱΖhd/>/dz^DEd ůůƚŚĂƚĐĞƌƚĂŝŶƉĂƌĐĞůŽĨůĂŶĚ͕ ƐŝƚƵĂƚĞŽŶƚŚĞŝƐůĂŶĚŽĨ^ĂŝŶƚƌŽŝǆŝŶƐƚĂƚĞ>ŽŶŐWŽŝŶƚΘ ŽƚƚŽŶ'ĂƌĚĞŶ͕ ĂƐƚĞŶĚYƵĂƌƚĞƌ͕ ďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĂƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐ ƌĂǁŝŶŐϭϭϳϳ͕ sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐĂĚĂƐƚƌĂůZĞĐŽƌĚƐĂƐWůŽƚϯ͕ ĂŶĚďĞŝŶŐŵŽƌĞƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌůǇ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗ ĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐĂƚĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨWůŽƚϲϰƐƚĂƚĞEŽƌƚŚ 'ƌĂƉĞƚƌĞĞĂǇ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϭϬΣϬϳΖϮϴΗϯϰϭ͘ ϰϯΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞϲϬΖǆϲϬΖ ŽŵƉŽƵŶĚ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞϲϬΖǆϲϬΖŽŵƉŽƵŶĚ>ĞĂƐĞƌĞĂ͕ ^ϲϬΣϭϬΖϮϮΗ ϭϱ͘ ϵϯΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞ^ϭϬΣϬϳΖϮϴΗtϯϲϵ͘ ϱϲΖƚŽĂƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƚŚĞŶĐĞEϭϰΣϬϬΖϬϬΗtϯϲ͘ ϳϬΖƚŽĂ ƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚƉŽŝŶƚďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞWŽŝŶƚŽĨĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŚĞƌĞŝŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚϭϱΖhƚŝůŝƚǇĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ ƐĂŝĚĂƐĞŵĞŶƚĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐϱ͕ ϯϯϮƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚ͕ ŵŽƌĞŽƌůĞƐƐ͘ ϭϱ͘ ϵϯΖ ϯϲ͘ ϳϬΖ EϭϬΣϬϳΖϮϴΗϯϰϭ͘ ϰϯΖ ^ϭϬΣϬϳΖϮϴΗtϯϲϵ͘ ϱϲΖ ϭϱΖhd/>/dz^DEd KEW>Kdϯ;ϱ͕ ϯϯϮ^&Ϳ APPENDIX D : OTHER SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - Lease Agreement - Easement Details (Deed 1963) - Title Search - Current Business License - Income Tax Clearance Letter - Property Tax Clearance Letter - Articles of Organization - Letter of Authorization (Officer's Certificate) - Permit Application (Form L&WD -2) - Zoning Requirements Table (Form L&WD – 3) - Major Project Summary Data (Form L&WD – 4) - Proof of Legal Interest (Form L&WD – 5) - Corporate Application Form (Form L&WD – 7) - NFIP Flood Zone Designation (Form L&WD – 8) - Certificate of Good Standing - Adjacent Ownership Certification - Elevation & Location Certification - Public Notice Mailing Address BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC Physical Address NORTH READING MA 01864 ST. THOMAS VI 00802 72 KRONPRINDSENS GADE 52754 License No: 1-52754-1L Licensee: BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC WATERFRONT CENTER, SUITE A 352 PARK STREET, SUITE 106 ST. THOMAS Trade Name: Business No: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS BUSINESS LICENSE That, in accordance with the applicable provisions of Title 3 Chapter 16 and Title 27 V.I.C. relating to the licensing of businesses and occupations, and compliance having been made with the provisions of 10 V.I.C. Sec. 41 relating to the Civil Rights Act of the Virgin Islands, the following license is hereby granted. KNOW ALL BY THIS PRESENT As provided by law, the authorized licensing authority shall have the power to revoke or suspend any License issued hereunder, upon finding, after notice and adequate hearing, that such revocation or suspension is in the public interest; provided, that any persons aggrieved by any such decision of this office shall be entitled to a review of the same by the Territorial Court upon appeal made within (30) days from the date of the decision; provided, further, that all decisions of this office hereunder shall be final except upon specific findings by the Court that the same was arrived at by fraud or illegal means. Importer of Goods Communic. Equip. Oper. Service Types of License(s) 2024 If a renewal is desired, the holder is responsible for making application for same without any notice from this office. It is the responsibility of the Licensee to notify the Department in writing within (30) days, when a license is to be cancelled or placed in inactive status. Failure to do so will result in the assessment of penalties as authorized by law. Valid from 05/28/2024 Printed on St. Thomas,V.I. Issued at 455.00 Fee Commissioner, Department of Licensing and Consumer Affairs THIS LICENSE MUST BE PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED AT PLACE OF BUSINESS 05/01/2024 until 05/31/2025 H. Nathalie Hodge INCOME TAX CLEARANCE LETTER (TO BE PROVIDED BY BLUE SKY TOWERS III LLC) OFFICE OF THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR DIVISION OF THE TAX COLLECTOR 5049 Kogens Gade ∙Charlotte Amalie, Virgin Islands 00802 ∙340.774.2991 ∙Fax 340.779.7825 1105 King Street ∙Christiansted, Virgin Islands 00820 ∙340.773.6449 ∙Fax 340.719.2355 _____________________________________________________________________________ REAL PROPERTY TAX CLEARANCE CERTIFICATE TO ALL WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME In accordance with 28 V.I.C. §121, as amended, I hereby certify that there are no outstanding Real Property Tax obligations for the following parcel: PARCEL NUMBER CERT NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION OWNER’S NAME Taxes have been researched up to and including ________. ______________________________________________________ CERTIFIED TRUE AND CORRECT BY Real Property Tax Collector SIGNATURE 08/27/2024 DATE 2-03500-0418-00 3 LONG POINT & COTTON GARDEN MICHAEL LOHMAN Brent A.Leerdam 2024-98096573 2024 8/27/2024 GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND NATURAL RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM L&WD-4 MAJOR PROJECT SUMMARY DATA Section l. A licant 1. N ame, address and telephone number of applicant. ___ B_lue._S~~wers~l......, 11 ,..--L~L-~----------------- 352 Park Street, Suite 106, North Reading , Massachusetts 01864 978-291-6517 (Ja~h1..1-) _____________ _ 2. Name, address and telephone number of owner of Property and of developer. O_wneLMichaeLLo.hman.5.0_QfLS .. ..Grapetree Bay, Cbristiaosted, St CrQix,J.lS.\ill)JIB.2.0 808-749-6540 Developer: Blue Sky Towers III._L_LC,352 Park Street. Suite 106,North Readiog, Massachusetts 01864 978-291- 3. Describe the proposed development Erection of 150' tall monopole communications tower w/ associated eguipment within a 60'x60' leased area. Project also to include construction of 15' x 1,655' of access/utility easement Section 111. Descri tion of Pro osed Develo ment 4. Name of development----=E=a=s=t -=E,_,_n=d,__ _____________ ____ _ 5. Plot No. 3 Est. Long Point & Cotton Garden 6. Zoning District:_~R_,__-~1 _____________________ _ 7. PWD Map No. 1177 8. Proposed use (residential, etc. as listed in Zoning Law): Communications tower 9. Accessory use if any __ n_/a _ ________________ ___ _ FORM L&WD-4 MAJOR PROJECT SUMMARY DATA Cont'd 10. Area of Lot(s) (acreage) --~?~a=c~r=e=s ________________ _ 11. Area covered by existing buildings (sq. ft.) ---=-º .:....:·0=--=-sg;:¡;•:..:..;ft"'-. ___________ _ 12. Area covered by proposed buildings (sq. t.) (tower base): 100 sg.ft. 13. Floor area total (tower base): 100 sq.ft. 14. Floor area ratio (B-1, 8-2 zones only) --'-n"'"'""/=ª---------------- 15. Number of buildings _ __,_(1'-'-)-'t=o-'--'w'-=e'-'-r __________________ _ 16. Number of units total n/a - -~~------------------- 17. Schedule ofunits: Person Persons Efficiencies ~□~ La...___ x 1.5 Unit ---~----- 1 bedroom _nl~-----x 2 ----~~----- 2 bedroom _n/a x 3 ----------- 3 bedroom --O x 4 -------~--- Other -~□~/a _ ____ X Total Persons _,_.,_......__ ______________ _ 18. Number of on site parking and loading spaces _1~ (u .... n .... m ......... a...,n ..... n.,,.e .... d ..... s""'"jt..,..e..,.) _______ _ 19. Maximum building height (stories/ft) _ 1_5_0_'_,_(t_o_w_e_r_h_e_i..._g_h_,_t) _________ _ 20. Adjoining property land use(s) ___ R ,__,_-1._..a""'n""d'-'R _,_-~3.__ ____________ _ ____8_djacent properties are residential. Sorne f the arcels are developed. Sorne are not. 21. Setback of building from street property line (ft)_2 .... 7.._0"'-'------------- 22. Sideyard setback (ft) __ 1_7_0' ____________________ _ 23. Rear yard setback (ft) __,3~4~5~'--------------------- 24. Density (person/acre) _ _ n--'/a:..:.__ ____________________ _ 25. Area of usable open space (sq. ft. % of lot) 304,820 sq.ft. (.03%) FORM L&WD-4 MAJOR PROJECT SUMMARY DATA Cont'd Section IV. Comments 26. Proposed Potable Water Supply (method & quality estímate gal/day) --~□~ 'ª~(..,.u~ □mann.e.d....s.i1e__1------------------------ 27. Proposed Sewage Treatment (method & quality estímate gal/day) ___ ..... n/"'"'a~(..,...unmaoned._s.i.1-+------------------------ 28. 29. 30. Proposed Salid Waste Disposal (method & quality estímate lbs/day) n/a unmanned s·te Proposed Electrical Supply (method & demand estímate KWH for single & 3 phase) 6.000 kW monthly Air Conditioning ( method & demand estímate (KWH) 31. Other Utilities_..:..;n:.:....:/a=--------------------------- 32. Other_-----'---'n:.:....:/a,,___ __________________________ _ Section V. 33. Will the development extend onto or adjoin any beach tidelands, submerged lands or public trustlands? No. 34. Will the development maintain, enhance or conflict with public access to the shoreline and along the coast? 35. 36. Developrnent will not affect existing public to shoreline and along the coast. Will the development protector provide moderate income housing opportunities? Will it displace moderate income housing? How will the development affect traffic on the coastal access roads? Development will not affect traffic along coastal access road. a. .. ~ 8/26/2024 Signature of owner or authorized agent Date James Rech, President and CEO of Blue Sky Towers 111, LLC Michael Lohman 5008 S Grapetree Bay, Christiansted, St. Croix, USVI 00820 808-749-6540 Elias Manguel, MECE, PE,PG,CWI 1579-E 939-338-6610 3 Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B X Applicant: Blue Sky Towers III Mailing Address: 352 Park Street, Suite 106, North Reading, Mass. 01864 Phone: 978-291-6517 (James Rech) 070320230211 Witness my hand and the seal of the Government of the United States Virgin Islands, on this 3rd day of July, 2023. Tregenza A. Roach Lieutenant Governor United States Virgin Islands Entity Type: Foreign Limited Liability Company Entity Status: In Good Standing Registration Date: 03/09/2021 Jurisdiction: Delaware, United States Wherefore, the aforementioned entity is duly formed under the laws of the Virgin Islands of the United States, is duly authorized to transact business, and, is hereby declared to be in good standing as witnessed by my seal below. This certificate is valid through June 30th, 2024. I, the undersigned Lieutenant Governor the United States Virgin Islands, do hereby certify that BLUE has filed in the Office of the Lieutenant Governor the requisite annual reports SKY TOWERS III, LLC and statements as required by the Virgin Islands Code, and the Rules and Regulations of this Office. In addition, the aforementioned entity has paid all applicable taxes and fees to date, and has a legal existence not having been cancelled or dissolved as far as the records of my office show. To Whom These Presents Shall Come: CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING Government of The United States Virgin Islands -O- Office of the Lieutenant Governor Division of Corporations & Trademarks Business Entity No. FC0112324 ϱϬϬϭͲϭϮ ŚĂŶĚůĞƌƐtŚĂƌĨ WKŽǆϮϱϭϬϱ ŚƌŝƐƚŝĂŶƐƚĞĚ͕ ^ĂŝŶƚ ƌŽŝǆ 'ĂůůŽǁƐĂǇ͕ s/ϬϬϴϮϰ sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐ ŽĨƚŚĞh^ WŚŽŶĞ͗ ϯϰϬ͘ ϳϳϴ͘ ϳϰϳϰ ũĞĨĨΛƚŚĞŐƌĞĞŶƉŝĞĐĞ͘ ƵƐ ǁǁǁ͘ ƚŚĞŐƌĞĞŶƉŝĞĐĞ͘ ƵƐ ϭĞƌƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞŽĨ^ƵƌǀĞǇ͗ ϭϲƵŐƵƐƚ ϮϬϮϯ WƌĞƉĂƌĞĚ&Žƌ͗ ůƵĞ^ŬǇdŽǁĞƌƐ͕ ///>> ^ŝƚĞZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ͗ ĂƐƚŶĚ^dy h^s/ϬϬϮϯϬ ^ŝƚĞĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ WůŽƚϯƐƚĂƚĞ>ŽŶŐWŽŝŶƚΘŽƚƚŽŶ'ĂƌĚĞŶ ĂƐƚĞŶĚYƵĂƌƚĞƌ͕ ^ƚ͘ ƌŽŝǆ͕ h^sŝƌŐŝŶ/ƐůĂŶĚƐϬϬϴϮϬ dŚĞĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚĂƚƚŚĞƚŽǁĞƌĐĞŶƚĞƌƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞĚŚĞƌĞŽŶĂƌĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶs/sϬϵ͕ ĂŶĚĂƌĞĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞƚŽ ǁŝƚŚŝŶϯĨĞĞƚĂƐĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚďǇŽƵƌĨŝĞůĚƐƵƌǀĞǇŽĨƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ͘ dŚĞĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŝƐĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗ 'ƌŽƵŶĚůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ^ŝƚĞ͗ ϭϰϴ͘ Ϯ͛ dŚĞŚŽƌŝǌŽŶƚĂůǀĂůƵĞƐŽĨƚŚĞĂďŽǀĞƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞĚƉŽŝŶƚ͕ ĂŶĚƚŚĞŐĞŽĚĞƚŝĐĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞƐƚŚĞƌĞŽĨ͕ ǁĞƌĞĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ďǇƚĂŬŝŶŐŵƵůƚŝƉůĞƌĞĂĚŝŶŐƐǁŝƚŚ'ůŽďĂůWŽƐŝƚŝŽŶŝŶŐ^ĂƚĞůůŝƚĞƌĞĐĞŝǀĞƌƐĂŶĚĂƌĞŚĞƌĞďǇĐĞƌƚŝĨŝĞĚƚŽďĞǁŝƚŚŝŶϭϱ ĨĞĞƚ͘ dŚĞǀĂůƵĞƐĂƌĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶEϭϵϴϯĂŶĚĂƌĞĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗ >ĂƚŝƚƵĚĞ͗ ϭϳº 45’ 08.6297” >ŽŶŐŝƚƵĚĞ͗ Ͳϲϰº 35’ 26.7075” :ĞĨĨƌĞǇĂƚĞŵĂŶ͕ W>^ s/W>^ϭϬϱϯͲ>^ APPENDIX E: WORK PLAN WORK PLAN WEEK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Permitting process 9/6/2024 12/6/2024 Land Clearing 12/7/2024 12/14/2024 Foundation excavation & road preparation 12/15/2024 1/1/2025 Cast tower foundation & equip. slabs 1/2/2025 2/2/2025 Erect tower 2/3/2025 2/17/2025 Erect tower compound security fence 2/18/2025 2/25/2025 Install electrical service 2/26/2025 3/3/2025 ACTIVITY START DATE COMPLETION DATE APPENDIX F : DRAWINGS - T1: Title Sheet - GN-1: General Notes - SI-1: Existing and Proposed Site Plans - C-1: Proposed Site Plan - C-2: Proposed Compound Site Plan - C-3: Proposed Equipment Area Layout - C-4: Site Elevation & Tower Configuration - C-5: Erosion and Sediment Control Plan - C-6: Details - C-7: Details - C-8: Fence Details - C-9: Site Grounding Plan - C-10: Site Grounding Details - S-1: Monopole Plan & Details - S-2: Monopole Details - S-3: Equipment Details - S-4: Equipment Details - S-5: Antenna Mounting Details - F-1: Foundation Plan, Details, and Notes - E-1: Proposed Electrical Site Plan - E-2: Electrical Details - E-3: One Line Diagram - E-4: Electrical & Grounding Plan - E-5: Electrical & Grounding Plan A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 T1 TITLE SHEET EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 INDEX OF DRAWINGS N LOCATION MAP FLOOD MAP PROPERTY INFORMATION CONTACTS PROJECT REFERENCES PROJECT INFORMATION DESIGN CRITERIA CONSTRUCTION NOTES APPROVALS AERIAL VIEW PROJECT SUMMARY N N N 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER FOR ACCESS TO SITE. 3. THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE INSTALLATION OF: A. ACCESS ROAD - GRUBBING & SUB BASE B. MATERIAL HANDING OF TOWER AND ANCHOR BOLTS FROM PORT TO SITE. C. COMPOUND CLEARING AND PREPARATION. D. TOWER CONCRETE FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION E. TOWER ERECTION F. ANCHOR TENANT PAD G. ANCHOR TENANT - SECONDARY CONDUITS P&T H. ANCHOR TENANT METER BANK W/ GROUNDING I. TOWER SITE GROUNDING - INCLUDES PIGTAILS FOR PROPOSED AND FUTURE TENANTS J. COMPOUND STONE AND FABRIC K. COMPOUND FENCING AND LOCKS L. INSTALLATION OF SITE SIGNAGE M. ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. N. 3RD PARTY INSPECTIONS REQUIRED IN BID DOCS. - BUILDING CODE, 2018 EDITION ANSI/TIA-222-REV. I (ALLOWED PER EXEMPTION #5 OF 1609.1, PRBC 2018) ASCE 7-16 WIND SPEED: 199 MPH RISK CATEGORY= II EXPOSURE= D - INTERNATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, 2018 EDITION - INTERNATIONAL FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2018 EDITION - CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM THAT THE SITE IS COMPLIANT WITH RF WARNING SIGNAGE & EMERGENCY SIGNAGE AS REQUIRED BY THE FEDERAL GUIDELINES CONTAINED WITH OET 65 BULLETIN. BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC AA1 CALLE 22 URB. RIVER VIEW BAYAMON, PR 00961-3802 ELIAS MANGUAL, MECE, PE 939-338-6610 ENGINEER: SITE OWNER: APPLICANT: 1. THIS IS AN UNMANNED FACILITY AND WILL BE USED FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF RADIO SIGNALS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING PUBLIC CELLULAR SERVICE. 2. LIBERTY MOBILE CERTIFIES THAT THIS EQUIPMENT FACILITY WILL BE SERVICES ONLY BY SERVICE EMPLOYEES AND SUBCONTRACTORS AND THE WORK ASSOCIATED WITH ANY EQUIPMENT CANNOT BE PERFORMED BY HANDICAPPED PERSONS. 3. THIS FACILITY WILL BE FREQUENTED ONLY BY SERVICE PERSONNEL FOR REPAIR PURPOSES ONLY. 4. NO POTABLE WATER SUPPLY IS TO BE PROVIDED AT THIS LOCATION. 5. NO WASTEWATER WILL BE GENERATED AT THIS LOCATION. 6. NO SOLID WASTE WILL BE GENERATED AT THIS LOCATION. SITE COORDINATES: LAT: 17.752397° LONG: -64.590752° X = 395,411.417 Y = 192,025.075 JURISDICTION: US VIRGIN ISLANDS (USVI) COUNTY: SAINT CROIX FLOOD MAP PANEL: 7800000075G MAP REVISED: APRIL 16, 2007 STRUCTURE TYPE AND HEIGHT: SELF SUPPORT MONOPOLE / 150'-0" AGL SITE ELEVATION: 45.17 MTS.=148.21 FT AMSL ADDRESS: PLOT NO.3, ESTATE LONG POINT & COTTON GARDEN, EAST END QUARTER ST CROIX, USVI 00820 SITE TYPE: NEW SITE BUILD PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE WITH A 150FT HIGH SELF SUPPORT MONOPOLE. - GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY: ------ DATED: ------ JOB NO: ----- - FOUNDATION DESIGN BY: ------- - TOWER DESIGN: AMBOR STRUCTURES TITLE: 150FT.199MPH TIA-H CLIENT: BLUESKY TOWER / QUOTATION NO: C15011028 DATE: 08/15/2024 / VERSION: A - SURVEY PLANS BY: THE GREEN PIECE ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENT, LLC - NSB LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INITIATIVE RFDS: LCPR_EAST END_2023 NEW SITE_LTE_15167353_313669_FINAL_FOR_SAQ - MOUNT MANUFACTURER DRAWINGS: AMBOR MODEL NO.: ASF0101-4120 AMBOR 3-SECTOR UNIVERSAL RING MOUNT, MODEL NO.: PMB1040 PROPERTY INFORMATION: OWNERSHIP: ’ ESTATES: BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC Elias Mangual Digitally signed by Elias Mangual Date: 2024.08.26 14:50:17 -04'00' A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 GN-1 GENERAL NOTES PROPOSED AREA FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE WITH AN 150 FT HIGH SELF SUPPORT MONOPOLE CENTER COORDINATES LAT: 17.752397° LONG: -64.590752° X = 395,411.417 Y = 192,025.075 PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT 410.681 sqmts. = 4,420.5332 sqft. (REFER TO SURVEY PLANS FOR DETAILS) PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE AREA: COMPOUND AREA: 334.45 SQMTS. = 3,600.00 SQFT. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/64"=1'-0" 1 SI-1 PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT THROUGH REM PLOT NO. 2 1,371.342 sqmts. = 14,761.00 sqft. (REFER TO SURVEY PLANS FOR DETAILS) PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT 495.359 sqmts. = 5,332.00sqft. (REFER TO SURVEY PLANS FOR DETAILS) A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 SI-1 EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" 1 C-1 PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT 495.359 sqmts. = 5,332.00sqft. (REFER TO SURVEY PLANS FOR DETAILS) (FOR ELECTRICAL DETAILS REFER TO ELECTRICAL SHEETS) A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 C-1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSED COMPOUND SITE PLAN SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" 1 C-2 A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 C-2 PROPOSED COMPOUND SITE PLAN PROPOSED LIBERTY MOBILE USVI EQUIPMENT AREA LAYOUT SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0" 1 C-3 A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 C-3 PROPOSED EQUIPMENT AREA LAYOUT SITE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" 1 C4 PROPOSED ANTENNA CONFIGURATION DETAIL SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" 2 C4 PROPOSED INSTALLATION LAYOUT ID QTY. PER POSITION DESCRIPTION POSITION SECTOR QTY. PER SECTOR TOTAL QTY. A 1 KATHREIN 800442008 ANTENNA 1 ALPHA/BETA/GAMMA 1 3 B 1 KATHREIN 840590003 ANTENNA 3 ALPHA/BETA/GAMMA 1 3 C 1 ERICSSON RRUS-4449 B5/B12 (700/850 BAND) 1 ALPHA/BETA/GAMMA 1 3 D 1 ERICSSON RRUS-4426 B66 (AWS BAND) 1 ALPHA/BETA/GAMMA 1 3 E 1 ERICSSON RRUS-4460 B25/B66 (PCS/WCS BAND) 3 ALPHA/BETA/GAMMA 1 3 F 1 ERICSSON RRUS-4478 B14 (700 BAND) 3 ALPHA/BETA/GAMMA 1 3 G 1 SQUID/SURGE SUPPRESSOR RAYCAP_DC9-48-60-24-8C-EV --- ALPHA/GAMMA 1 2 A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 C-4 SITE ELEVATION AND PROPOSED ANTENNA CONFIGURATION EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 1 C-5 A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 C-5 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN 1 C-6 3 C-6 2 C-6 STRAW BALE DIKE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE GRAVEL COMPOUND DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SILT FENCE DETAIL (IF NECESSARY) NOT TO SCALE A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 C-6 DETAILS SUBGRADE PROOF ROLLED/COMPACTED CLASS 4 GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL "MIRAFI-500X" (OR EQUAL) 3" OF #3 STONE (3" TO 4" STONE CLEAN) 3" OF DGA STONE (1" OR LESS WITH FINES AND DUST) NOTE: -USE OF SWALES AND/OR DRAINAGE DITCHES FOR PROPER WATER RUNOFF AS NEEDED. -AGGREGATE IS BASED ON STANDARD AASHTO. -SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 1/4" PER FOOT TO MAX. GRADE OF 6" FROM CENTER OF COMPOUND TO EACH FENCE LINE NOTICE WARNING x AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY x HARD HATS REQUIRED x WATCH FOR FALLING MATERIAL x WATCH FOR TRIPPING HAZARDS x WATCH FOR UNEVEN SURFACES x IN THE EVENT OF A T-STORM, VACATE THE COMPOUND INFORMATION SITE IDENTIFICATION SIGN NOT TO SCALE 5 C-7 12x18 RF NOTICE SIGN NOT TO SCALE 4 C-7 CAUTION CONSTRUCTION AREA NOT TO SCALE 6 C-7 CONCRETE PAD FONDATION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 1 C-7 ACCESS ROAD SURFACING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 3 C-7 SITE COMPOUND AREA SURFACING NOT TO SCALE 2 C-7 A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 C-7 DETAILS TYPICAL STYMIE LOCK OR SIMILAR APPROVED BY OWNER GATES STRETCHER BARS GATE KEEPER BRACKET VERIFY WITH BLUE SKY TOWER THE NUMBER OF PADLOCKS REQUIRED A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 C-8 FENCE DETAILS STANDARD FENCE DETAILS NOT TO SCALE 1 C-8 STYMIE LOCK DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 2 C-8 A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 GROUNDING PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 1 C-9 C-9 SITE GROUNDING PLAN WIRE TO COAX GROUND BAR NOT TO SCALE 5 C-10 LUG DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 6 C-10 GROUND ROD DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 7 C-10 VERTICAL POST CONNECTED NOT TO SCALE 1 C-10 POST CONNECTED TO RING NOT TO SCALE 2 C-10 GROUND INSPECTION TEST WELL NOT TO SCALE 3 C-10 TYPICAL GROUND BAR NOT TO SCALE 4 C-10 A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 C-10 SITE GROUNDING DETAILS A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 S-1 MONOPOLE PLAN DETAILS AND NOTES A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 S-2 MONOPOLE DETAILS RRU MOUNTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. 6 S-3 ANTENNA GROUNDING SCHEMATIC SCALE: N.T.S. 3 S-3 HANGER ADAPTER GROMMET DETAILS SCALE: N.T.S. 4 S-3 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS SCHEDULE KATHREIN - 800442008 SCALE: N.T.S. 1 S-3 KATHREIN (ERICSSON) - 840590003 SCALE: N.T.S. 2 S-3 DETAILED "H" FRAME SCALE: N.T.S. 5 S-3 A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 S-3 EQUIPMENT DETAILS ERICSSON DC9-48-60-24-8C-EV MOUNT DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. 7 S-4 RRUS-4449 DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. 1 S-4 RRUS-4478 B14 DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. 2 S-4 RRUS-4426 B66 DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. 3 S-4 ICE BRIDGE - SITEPRO 1 - PART NO. IB24B-V SCALE: N.T.S. 6 S-4 RRUS-4460 DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. 4 S-4 A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 S-4 EQUIPMENT DETAILS A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 12'-8" Ø2.362" x 0.157" Ø2.362" x 0.157" Ø2.362" x 0.157" 1 6 7 8 A B 11 12,14 13 AMBOR MODEL NO.: ASF0101-4120 NOT TO SCALE 1 S-5 Application Data Fits Poles: Round or Polygon Material: Hot dip galvanized steel Wind Ratng: 140mph per TIA/EIA-222 160mph 3-second gust, Exposure “D”, at 150’ AGL Part No PMB1040 Size Range Weight (lbs) 10”- 40” 231 RING MOUNT MODEL NO.: PMB1040 NOT TO SCALE AMBOR 3-SECTOR UNIVERSAL 2 S-5 S-5 ANTENNA MOUNT DETAIL TOWER FOUNDATION GENERAL NOTES 1. TOWER FOUNDATION DESIGN CAPACITY AS PER TT ENGINEERING. DESIGN CALCULATIONS, JOB NO. , DATED . 2. TOWER FOUNDATION LOCATION SHALL CONCORD WITH TOWER STRUCTURAL DETAILS. 3. CONCRETE SHALL FOLLOW DIRECTIONS FROM IBC 2018, AND SHALL HAVE A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 5,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. 4. ALL MATERIALS, SLURRY, CONCRETE OR ANY OTHER SHALL BE CONTAINED AT ALL TIMES IN ORDER TO PREVENT WATER CONTAMINATION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DISPOSING, OUT OF PROJECT LIMITS AT A PLACE PROCURED BY HIM, ALL MATERIAL, RESIDUALS OR ANY OTHER RESULTING FROM THE EXCAVATIONS RELATED TO DRILLED SHAFTS AND/OR CONCRETE POURING. 6. ALL EXISTING DEBRIS AND UNDERLYING UTILITIES SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT AREAS AND SHALL BE PAID UNDER PILE SPECIFICATION PAID ITEM. ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY NOT REMOVED WILL BE SUBJECTED TO NEW PRESSURES, WHICH CAN DAMAGE IT AND ALSO AFFECT THE NEW STRUCTURES. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE CARE TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO SURROUNDING STRUCTURES DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS (INCLUDING EARTHWORKS). 8. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS CONSTRUCTION METHOD, HIS METHOD OF EXCAVATION, THE WORKING CONDITIONS AT THE JOB SITE, AND THE SAFETY MEASURES. THIS REQUIREMENT APPLIES CONTINUOUSLY AND IS NOT LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. STRUCTURAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 5,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH "THE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE", ACI 318, LATEST EDITION. FOUNDATION INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 336, "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF DRILLED PIERS", LATEST EDITION. 2. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-615 (GRADE 60) EXCEPT THAT CAISSON TIES MAY BE ASTM A-615 (GRADE 40). ALL REINFORCING DETAILS SHALL CONFORM TO "MANUAL OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR DETAILING REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES", ACI 315, LATEST EDITION, UNLESS DETAILED OTHERWISE ON THIS DRAWING. 3. ANCHOR BOLTS AS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. 4. APPROXIMATE CONCRETE VOLUME = 84 CUBIC YARDS. 5. FOUNDATION DESIGN IS BASED UPON GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT PREPARED BY: JOB NO.: DATED: 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL READ THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND CONSULT THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AS NECESSARY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 7. THE FOUNDATION WAS DESIGNED USING THE FOLLOWING FACTORED LOADS: POLE REACTIONS COMPRESSION= 84 KIPS MOMENT: 15451 KIPS-FT SHEAR: 145 KIPS 8. MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER FOR REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE 3" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. APPROVED SPACERS SHALL BE USED TO INSURE A 3" MINIMUM COVER ON REINFORCEMENT. A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 TOWER FOUNDATION ELEVATION SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" 2 F-1 TOWER FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" 1 F-1 PIER SECTION (A-A) SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" 3 F-1 SPECIAL NOTE: F-1 FOUNDATION PLAN DETAILS AND NOTES A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" 1 E-1 E-1 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 33" 2" 5" 2" 4" 5" 2" 2" 2" 2" 12" 18" MIN. 3" 3 3 36" MIN. 12" 30" 212" 212" 4" 5" 4" 3" 6" 212" CONSTRUCTION ON MONOPOLE SCALE: NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL RISER METALLIC CONDUIT 4 E-2 NEW METERBANK DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 1 E-2 DETAIL (FRONT VIEW) SCALE: NOT TO SCALE NEW METERBANK H-FRAME 2 E-2 DETAIL (REART VIEW) SCALE: NOT TO SCALE NEW METERBANK H-FRAME 3 E-2 MAIN FEEDER TRENCH DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 5 E-2 NEW TRENCH DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 6 E-2 A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 E-2 ELECTRICAL DETAILS H-FRAME RACK A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 ONE LINE DIAGRAM SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 1 E-3 E-3 ONE LINE DIAGRAM A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL PLAN SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" 1 E-4 PROPOSED GROUNDING PLAN SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" 2 E-4 E-4 ELECTRICAL & GROUNDING PLAN COAXIAL CABLE GROUND KIT SCALE: N.T.S. 1 E-5 CONNECTION OF GROUND WIRES TO UPPER CGB @ ANTENNAS SCALE: N.T.S. 2 E-5 TYPICAL GROUND BAR SCALE: N.T.S. 3 E-5 TO COAX GROUND BAR SCALE: N.T.S. GROUND WIRE INSTALLATION 4 E-5 LUG DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. 5 E-5 GROUND INSPECTION TEST WELL SCALE: N.T.S. 6 E-5 GROUND ROD DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. 7 E-5 A.C.R. SHEET DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER REV DATE DESCRIPTION ELIAS MANGUAL, PE USVI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #1579 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW 07/18/24 EAST END USVI-00230 BLUE SKY TOWERS III, LLC 352 PARK STREET STE 106 NORTH READING MA 01864 LIBERTY MOBILE USVI INC. 279 AVE PONCE DE LEON SAN JUAN PR 00917 TOWER TECH ENGINEERING, PSC. AA1 CALLE 22 RIVER VW BAYAMON PR 00961 E.M.U. ENGINEERING PSC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS B ISSUED FOR REVIEW 08/13/24 0 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES 08/23/24 E-5 ELECTRICAL & GROUNDING PLAN APPENDIX G : HISTORICAL - VISHPO Clearance Letter - Phase 1 (A&B) Archeological Survey 1 DeAnna Anglin From: David Brewer <David.Brewer@dpnr.vi.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 12:05 PM To: DeAnna Anglin Cc: Carlos Solis; Miles Walz-Salvador; NEPA NHPA; Sean L. Krigger; Eboni Powell Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL MAIL] SHPO Section 106 Consultation request for BST_228 - East End USVI-00230 Attachments: BST_228 - East End USVI-00230.kmz Ms. Anglin: I reviewed the many pages of data and the cultural survey contained in the Dropbox below. I also discussed the project with both the archaeological consultant and my Director. The VISHPO has no objection to the proposed monopole cell tower. By the way, the SHPO has 45 days to respond, and in the Virgin Islands it sometimes may go beyond that – marking something as "HIgh Importance" does not necessarily make it so, and the amount of information contained in the Dropbox was unnecessary. You may wish to consult with your co-worker Miles, with whom we have interacted successfully on these type of projects for quite a while. It is our understanding that both the Lotis Group and we (VISHPO) want to make this operation quick and smooth and painless as possible, in anticipation of the other ones wherein serious issues might arise. Finally, I am retiring, so be sure to copy my Director, Sean L. Krigger, on any forthcoming correspondence (please tell Miles as well, since he and Sean have already developed a productive working relationship). David M. Brewer Senior Archaeologist Virgin Islands State Historic Preservation Office Fort Frederik Museum 198 Strand St. Frederiksted, St. Croix U.S. Virgin Islands 00840 E-mail: david.brewer@dpnr.vi.gov Phone: (340) 719-7089 From:ĞŶŶĂŶŐůŝŶфŶŐůŝŶΛƚŚĞůŽƚŝƐŐƌŽƵƉ͘ ĐŽŵх Sent:&ƌŝĚĂǇ͕ DĂǇϮϰ͕ ϮϬϮϰϰ͗ ϭϯWD To:ĂǀŝĚƌĞǁĞƌфĂǀŝĚ͘ ƌĞǁĞƌΛĚƉŶƌ͘ ǀŝ͘ ŐŽǀх Cc:ĂƌůŽƐ^ŽůŝƐфĐŵƐŽůŝƐΛŐŵĂŝů͘ ĐŽŵх͖ EWE,WфEW͘ E,WΛƚŚĞůŽƚŝƐŐƌŽƵƉ͘ ĐŽŵх Subject:΀ydZE>D/>΁^,WK^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϬϲŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĨŽƌ^dͺϮϮϴͲĂƐƚŶĚh^s/ͲϬϬϮϯϬ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• '2C62D<3A52.?05.2<9<460.9@6A23692@A5?<B450<;@B9A.A6<;D6A5A52+(&% • '2C62D<356@A<?60.;1:<12?;0.?A<4?.=560@<B?02@ • '2C62D<3?2.169F.C.69./92=B/96@521.;1B;=B/96@52196A2?.AB?2 )5236;16;4@</A.6;211B?6;4A5296A2?.AB?2.;1?20<?1@@2.?05.?2=?2@2;A216;(20A6<; <3A56@?2=<?A "%-*.0 )5292@@@A22=@9<=2@.9<;4A52=?<=<@21.002@@?<.1.964;:2;AD2?2@5<C29A2@A21.9<;4.@6;492A?.;@20A A5.A/20.B@2<3 A5212;@2C242A.A6<;:2.;12?21D6A56;.;.==?<E6:.A29F :2A2?D612.?2..;1D.@ @5<C29A2@A21.A:2A2?6;A2?C.9@ .050<?;2?.;1A5202;A2?<3A52/F3<<A:<;<=<920<:=<B;1 D.@@5<C29A2@A21 )52@5<C29A2@A@:2.@B?21.==?<E6:.A29F02;A6:2A2?@6;16.:2A2?.;1D2?22E0.C.A21 A<12=A5@;<9<;42?0<;@612?21A<5.C2A52=<A2;A6.9<30<;A.6;6;4;<;?.;1<:.?A63.0A/2.?6;4:.A?602@ 2;2?.99FA52@5<C29A2@A@D2?22EA2;121A</2AD22;.;102;A6:2A2?@/29<DA524?<B;1@B?3.02A52 12=A5@.AD5605A52.?A63.0AB.99F@A2?6924?.C299F9<.:@B/@A?.A.D.@2;0<B;A2?21 )2@A9<0.A6<;@A5.AD2?2 <;@A22=9F@9<=6;44?<B;1@9<=2D2?2?.821/.08A<.@@2@@3<?A52=?2@2;02<30B9AB?.9:.A2?6.9@ A5.A:645A/22?<16;43?<:56452?292C.A6<;@ )52@<693?<:2.05@5<C29A2@AD.@@0?22;21A5?<B45J6;05 5.?1D.?209<A5A<?20<C2?.?A63.0A@63.;F64B?2@.;1 64B?2&5<A<4?.=5<32E.:=92@5<C29A2@A.9<;4A5292@@@A22==.?A@<3A52.002@@?<.1 #"$&"% '&'$%"'$%'$(* $&%" !"&"!"!&!"&&"! $!& $") """$"& * 64B?2&5<A<4?.=5<32E.:=92@5<C29A2@A6;A52:<;<=<920<:=B;1 #"$&"% '&'$%"'$%'$(* $&%" !"&"!"!&!"&&"! $!& $") """$"& * $<0B9AB?.9?2@<B?02@D2?2612;A63621.9<;4A52=?<=<@21.002@@?<.1.;1:<;<=<920<:=<B;11B?6;4<B? (B?C2F )52?2@B9A@<3A52(B?C2F.?2=?2@2;A21/29<D ",*,-*'(*+*! )5296A2?.AB?2.;1?20<?1@?2C62D=2?3<?:21161;<A612;A63F=<A2;A6.99F@64;6360.;A0B9AB?.9?2@<B?02@D6A56; A52 @B?C2F .?2.@ )52 +(&% 6;3<?:21 B@ A5.A ;< 0B9AB?.9 ?2@<B?02@ <3 ?20<?1 D2?2 96@A21 6; A52 .?05.2<9<460.9@6A23692@<?A52+'246@A?F3<?A52@B/720A=?<=2?AF6 2 A52.002@@?<.1.964;:2;A2.@2:2;A .;1A52=?<=<@21:<;<=<920<:=<B;1 )52+(&%161=?<C6126;3<?:.A6<;?24.?16;40B9AB?.9?2@<B?02@ <3?20<?13<?A5242;2?.9.?2. %;2=?20<9<;6.9.?05.2<9<460.9@6A2 +:*4*?.:2?&.?8(6A2 D56056@96@A216;A52+6?46;@9.;1@;C2;A<?F<36@A<?60&9.02@6@=.?A6.99F0<;A.6;21D6A56;A52I:692 C6@B.9.?2.<3=<A2;A6.923320A@&?.16B@<3A52:<;<=<9264B?2 $<@6A2@96@A21<;A52$.A6<;.9 '246@A2?<36@A<?60&9.02@$'&2E6@AD6A56;A52I:692&@5<D;/29<D 64B?2<<492.?A56:.4212=60A6;4A52 :692&3<?C6@B.923320A@.;1A529<0.A6<;<3A52?.:2? &.?8 #"$&"% '&'$%"'$%'$(* $&%" !"&"!"!&!"&&"! $!& $") """$"& * %B??2C62D<356@A<?600.?A<4?.=560@<B?02@6;160.A2@;<@2AA92:2;A@D2?29<0.A21.9<;4A52=?<=<@21.002@@ ?<.1<?A52:<;<=<920<:=<B;1 )52?<;2;/2?4 .242@/2?4:.=64B?212=60A@.@A?B0AB?2 9<0.A21 .==?<E6:.A29F :2A2?@ A< A52 ;<?A52.@A <3 A52 :<;<=<92 0<:=<B;1 A5.A 96829F 12=60A@ A52 9<0.A6<;<3A52<AA<;.?12;=9.;A.A6<;@2AA92:2;A $<@A?B0AB?2@.?2@5<D;.9<;4A52=?<=<@21.002@@?<.1<?:<;<=<920<:=<B;1.;1A526? 6::216.A2 C606;6AF<;A52%E5<9::.=64B?2 A5<B45A52<AA<;.?12;=9.;A.A6<;@2AA92:2;A6@@5<D;A< A52;<?A52.@A<3A52:<;<=<920<:=<B;1 $26A52?A52 # 208:.=;<?A52&.?@<;@1:6?.9AF 5.?A;<?1< 02;AB?F*((64B?2<?*((>B.1?.;492@12=60A@2AA92:2;A@<?@A?B0AB?2@D6A56; A52:<;<=<92@6A2A52.002@@?<.1<?A526?6::216.A2C606;6AF 64B?2(24:2;A<3A52?<;2;/2?4 .4.2@/2?4:.=12=60A6;4A52.==?<E6:.A29<0.A6<;?21.??<D <3A52:<;<=<920<:=<B;1 (<B?020<B?A2@F<3A52.;6@52<1.A.42;0F #"$&"% '&'$%"'$%'$(* $&%" !"&"!"!&!"&&"! $!& $") """$"& * 64B?2 (24:2;A <3 A52 %E5<9: :.= 12=60A6;4 A52 .==?<E6:.A2 9<0.A6<; ?21 .??<D <3 A52 :<;<=<920<:=<B;1 64B?2(24:2;A<3A52 *(<.@A.92<12A60:.=<3(A ?<6E12=60A6;4A52.==?<E6:.A29<0.A6<; ?21.??<D<3A52:<;<=<920<:=<B;1 #"$&"% '&'$%"'$%'$(* $&%" !"&"!"!&!"&&"! $!& $") """$"& * "%-*.0 $<0B9AB?.9?2@<B?02@D2?2612;A636211B?6;4A5236291@B?C2F=2?3<?:213<?A52.002@@?<.1.;1:<;<=<92 0<:=<B;1 99A523<B?A22;@5<C29A2@A@=2?3<?:21.@D299.@A52?.86;4<3@B?3.0296AA2?.9<;4@A22=@9<=2@ A<.@@2@@3<?A52=?2@2;02<3.?A63.0A@A5.A:645A/22?<16;43?<:56452?292C.A6<;@D2?2;24.A6C2 64B?2 12=60A@A529<0.A6<;@<3.99A52@5<C29A2@A@.;1A52@A22=@9<=2@ 64B?2:.42<3A52.002@@?<.1.;1:<;<=<920<:=<B;112=60A6;4A529<0.A6<;<3A52;24.A6C2@5<C29 A2@A@.;1C2?F@A22=@9<=2@ #"$&"% '&'$%"'$%'$(* $&%" !"&"!"!&!"&&"! $!& $") """$"& * %B?0<;09B16;4?2:.?8@.;1?20<::2;1.A6<;@.?2=?<C6121/29<D ('%-+"('+ $<0B9AB?.9?2@<B?02@D2?2612;A636211B?6;4A52&5.@2B9AB?.9'2@<B?02@(B?C2F3<?A52=?<=<@21 3<<A9<;4.002@@?<.1<?A52/F3<<A:<;<=<920<:=<B;1@6A2 )5296A2?.AB?2.;1?20<?1@ @2.?05?2@B9A216;A52612;A6360.A6<;<3<;2.?05.2<9<460.9@6A2<3?20<?1 +:*4*?.:2?&.?8(6A2 .@=.?A6.99F0<;A.6;21D6A56;A52I:692&64B?2 20.B@2<3292C.A6<;16332?2;02@;<16?20A96;2 <3C6@6<;6@=<@@6/923?<:A52=?<=<@21.002@@?<.1<?:<;<=<920<:=<B;1A<?.:2?&.?8.;1C602C2?@. ,2 ;<A2 A5.A A52 :.@@6C2 "<;4 .@2 ??.F ;A2;;. 6@ 9<0.A21 .==?<E6:.A29F :2A2?@ 3?<: A52 .?05.2<9<460.9@6A2 ,2.9@<;<A2A5.A/.@21<;<B?=.@A</@2?C.A6<;@.;1?202;AA2@A6;43<?=.?A<3A52@6A2 A5.A A52 0<;A2EAB.9 6;A24?6AF <3 A52 .?05.2<9<460.9 @6A2 .==2.?@ A< 5.C2 /22; 0<:=?<:6@21 /F =.@A .4?60B9AB?.9=?.0A602@.;1:<?2?202;A092.?6;4.;19.;1@0.=2:.6;A2;.;02.0A6C6A62@ (&&',"('+ <0<(<9?20<::2;1@A5.AA52+6?46;@9.;1@2=.?A:2;A<3&9.;;6;4.;1$.AB?.9'2@<B?02@+6?46;@9.;1@ (A.A26@A<?60&?2@2?C.A6<;%336026@@B2.36;16;4<3 A<A52=?<=<@21=?<720AA</B691A52 =?<=<@21B;6:=?<C21?<.1.;1A52:<;<=<920<:=<B;1.;16A@?29.A21.==B?A2;.;02@ 30B9AB?.9?2@<B?02@ .?2612;A636211B?6;4092.?6;4.;1 <?0<;@A?B0A6<;.0A6C6A62@D<?8@5<B91/2@A<==216;A52.?2.<30<;02?; A520B9AB?.9?2@<B?02@=?<A20A21.;1A522=.?A:2;A<3&9.;;6;4.;1$.AB?.9'2@<B?02@+6?46;@9.;1@ (A.A26@A<?60&?2@2?C.A6<;%33602;<A636216::216.A29F #"$&"% '&'$%"'$%'$(* $&%" !"&"!"!&!"&&"! $!& $") """$"& * ''$( <<85.;@..0 6@A<?F<3A52+6?46;@9.;1@<3A52*;6A21(A.A2@ .;<2&?2@@!6;4@A<;9<?61.#B@2B:<3 $.AB?.96@A<?F .?1F#2?216A5 (.9.1<610<;<:F.;1<:=92E6AF<;A52?.D.8.;?<;A62? *;=B/96@521&5 6@@2?A.A6<; 2=.?A:2;A<3;A5?<=<9<4F9<?61.(A.A2*;6C2?@6AF).99.5.@@22 .AAB1:B;1 ?05.2<9<4F<3A52+6?46;@9.;1@ ;&?<02216;4@<3A52 ;A2?;.A6<;.9<;4?2@@<3 :2?60.;6@A@&.?A )52.4B2 !224.;,6996.: ,2@A;16.;?05.2<9<4F 2?.:6042 <B?;.9<3?05.2<9<460.9'2@2.?05 #<?@26?46A./2? (.9.1<61'2:.6;@.;11.=A6C2(A?.A2462@6;(A ?<6E+6?46;@9.;1@ ;.?9F2?.:60&<=B9.A6<; "632D.F@.;11.=A6C2(A?.A2462@6;A52.?6//2.;216A21/F&2A2? (62429== ?6A6@5 ?05.2<9<460.9'2=<?A@';A2?;.A6<;.9(2?62@ %E3<?1 $.A6<;.9'246@A2?<36@A<?60&9.02@$<:6;.A6<;<?:3<?@A.A2<42;@/<?4 5AA=@ ;=4.992?F ;=@ 4<C $'& @@2A2A.69 2 21.1/.0.00 /2.2 '<B@2?C6;4 )52).6;<@'6@2.;12096;2<3A52&2<=92,5<?22A21<9B:/B@ -.92*;6C2?@6AF&?2@@$2D .C2; *;6A21(A.A2@2=.?A:2;A<34?60B9AB?2 (<69(B?C2F<3A52*;6A21(A.A2@+6?46;@9.;1@ $.AB?.9'2@<B?02@<;@2?C.A6<;(2?C602* ( ,.@56;4A<; APPENDIX H : SITE PHOTOS - Photo#1: Looking north toward proposed undertaking - Photo#2: Looking north away from proposed undertaking - Photo#3: Looking east toward proposed undertaking - Photo#4: Looking east away from proposed undertaking - Photo#5: Looking south toward proposed undertaking - Photo#6: Looking south away from proposed undertaking - Photo#7: Looking west toward proposed undertaking - Photo#8: Looking west away from proposed undertaking - Photo#9: Looking north along proposed easement - Photo#10: Looking south along proposed easement - Photo#11: Looking south along proposed easement - Photo#12: Looking north along proposed easement - Photo#13: General view of proposed undertaking NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End Site Photograph 1 – Looking north toward the proposed undertaking Site Photograph 2 – Looking north away from the proposed undertaking Site Photographs Blue Sky Towers III, LLC – East End near Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, Virgin Islands 00820 Photographed: May 16, 2024 NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End Site Photograph 3 – Looking east toward the proposed undertaking Site Photograph 4 – Looking east away from the proposed undertaking Site Photographs Blue Sky Towers III, LLC – East End near Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, Virgin Islands 00820 Photographed: May 16, 2024 NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End Site Photograph 5 – Looking south toward the proposed undertaking Site Photograph 6 – Looking south away from the proposed undertaking Site Photographs Blue Sky Towers III, LLC – East End near Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, Virgin Islands 00820 Photographed: May 16, 2024 NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End Site Photograph 7 – Looking west toward the proposed undertaking Site Photograph 8 – Looking west away from the proposed undertaking Site Photographs Blue Sky Towers III, LLC – East End near Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, Virgin Islands 00820 Photographed: May 16, 2024 NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End Site Photograph 9 – Looking north along the proposed access/utility easement Site Photograph 10 – Looking south along the proposed access/utility easement Site Photographs Blue Sky Towers III, LLC – East End near Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, Virgin Islands 00820 Photographed: May 16, 2024 NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End Site Photograph 11– Looking south along the proposed utility easement Site Photograph 12 – Looking north along the proposed utility easement Site Photographs Blue Sky Towers III, LLC – East End near Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, Virgin Islands 00820 Photographed: May 16, 2024 NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End Site Photograph 13 – General view of the proposed undertaking Site Photographs Blue Sky Towers III, LLC – East End near Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, Virgin Islands 00820 Photographed: May 16, 2024 APPENDIX I : ENVIRONMENTAL - Fish & Wildlife Findings Letter - Phase I Environmental Survey Assessment Report (ESA) - Bio Survey and Endangered Species Assessment United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Caribbean Ecological Services Field Office Bayamón | Mayagüez | Maricao | Río Grande | St Croix P.O. Box 491 Boquerón, Puerto Rico 00622 In Reply Refer To: FWS/R4/CESFO/78010-033 Submitted Via Electronic Mail: anglin@thelotisgroup.com Ms. DeAnna Anglin Senior Biologist/NEPA Specialist Lotis Environmental, LLC 8899 Main Street – Suite 107 Williamsville, NY 14221 Re: East End Telecommunication Tower, St. Croix, USVI Dear Ms. Anglin: Thank you for your letter dated May 24, 2024, requesting informal consultation on the above referenced project. As per your request, our comments are provided under the Endangered Species Act (Act) (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 United States Code 1531 et seq.), and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.). Blue Sky Towers III (BST), LLC (the Applicant), is proposing to construct a 150 feet monopole telecommunication tower in addition to a 15 feet wide by 1,286 feet long easement road that will connect with East End Road. The project area of approximately 0.7 acres is located near Plot 3 Estate Long Point and Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands (17° 45' 0.86297" N, -64° 35' 26.7075" W). Lotis Environmental (Lotis), LCC, is the designated non-federal representative and submitted the consultation for this project on behalf of BST. Using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system, Lotis determined that the proposed project lies within the range of the threatened green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas), and the endangered hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) and leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea) sea turtles. According to the information provided, the proposed project is on the landward side of East End Road approximately 140 feet south from the proposed Green sea turtle critical habitat unit USVI-04 on Knight’s Bay. Based on the nature of the project, scope of work, and location, available information, and implementation of the Service’s sea turtle conservation measures, Lotis determined that the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the above mentioned sea turtles. Lotis also determined that sea turtle critical habitat would not be adversely affected. The sea turtle conservation measures provided by IPaC will be implemented. Ms. Anglin 2 We have reviewed the information provided in your letter and our files, and concur with your determination that the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the green, hawksbill and leatherback sea turtles with the implementation of the conservation measures provided by IPaC. In view of this, we believe that requirements of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) have been satisfied. However, obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impact of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner that was not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner not previously considered in this assessment; or (3) a new species is listed, or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action. Telecommunication and other towers can have impacts to migratory birds not protected under the Act. For instance, lighting can attract birds during migration. We would be glad to assist in design and planning for future towers on the Island. For best management practices related to migratory birds and towers, please visit: x https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/usfws-communication-tower- guidance.pdf x https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/bird-friendly-communication-tower-toolkit Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us via email at caribbean_es@fws.gov or by phone at (786) 244-0081. Sincerely, Silmarie Padrón Acting Field Supervisor jpz Lotis Job - BST_228 June 13, 2024 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT (ASTM E1527-21) USVI-00230 East End Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix 00820 Prepared for: Blue Sky Towers III, LLC 352 Park Street, Suite 106 North Reading, Massachusetts 01864 Prepared by: Lotis Environmental, LLC 8899 Main Street - Suite 107 Williamsville, New York 14221 PROJECT SUMMARY ASTM Practice E1527-21 Phase I ESA Environmental Site Assessment Site Name: East End Site ID: USVI-00230 Coordinates: 17.752397, -64.590752 Project Location: Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix 00820 Prepared For: Blue Sky Towers III, LLC 352 Park Street, Suite 106 North Reading, Massachusetts 01864 Lotis Job Number: BST_228 Critical Report Dates Date of Regulatory Database: May 23, 2024 Date of Site Reconnaissance: May 16, 2024 Date of Owner Interview: No response Date of Fire Interview: No response Date of Issuance: June 13, 2024 Report Valid Until: November 12, 2024 CLIENT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT This report has been prepared for Blue Sky Towers III, LLC, its subsidiaries, successors, assigns, and affiliates. The report is intended for use by any rating agency, issuer, purchaser, or underwriter of securities that are collateralized or backed by the property described in this report, as well as for any loans placed upon the property. Blue Sky Towers III, LLC consents to the inclusion of this report in any paper or digital format, including any electronic media, such as storage devices or the internet/hyperlink, in the Prospectus Supplement related to such securitization transactions, and consents to our firm's reference under the caption 'Experts' in such Prospectus Supplement. We, as the authors of this report, declare that we meet the definition of Environmental Professionals as defined in 40 CFR 312.10, and possess the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience required to assess a property with the nature, history, and setting of the subject property (also known as the Subject Property). We have developed and conducted all appropriate inquiries into the environmental conditions at the subject property in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Additional details about our qualifications can be found in Appendix F. Kelly Reidy-Kaczmarek David N. Robinson, P.E. Environmental Scientist President/CEO No Further Work Recommended Concerns Identified but No Further Work Recommended (see Executive Summary, Page 1) Further Work Recommended (see Executive Summary, Page 1) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Significant Assumptions ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Limitations and Exceptions ................................................................................................................................ 6 Deviations .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Site Description ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 General .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Site Reconnaissance ......................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Current Uses of the Subject Property: ....................................................................................................... 8 2.2.2 Site Visit Observations for the Subject Property ........................................................................................ 9 2.2.3 Current Uses of Adjacent/Nearby Properties: .......................................................................................... 10 2.2.4 Site Visit Observations for Adjacent Properties ....................................................................................... 10 Environmental and Historical Records Review .................................................................................................... 11 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 General Topographic Setting ................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.2 Surface Water .......................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.3 Groundwater Wells and Depth ................................................................................................................. 11 3.1.4 Groundwater Flow .................................................................................................................................... 11 Historical Use Information ................................................................................................................................ 12 Summary of Previous Environmental Site Assessments................................................................................. 12 State Standard and Federal Environmental Record Sources.......................................................................... 13 Environmental and Historical Records Review .................................................................................................... 14 Current Owner/Operators/Site Occupants/Site Manager ................................................................................ 14 Local Government Officials .............................................................................................................................. 14 Additional Interviews ........................................................................................................................................ 14 User Questionnaire .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Non-Scope Environmental Considerations .......................................................................................................... 15 Asbestos-Containing Building Materials .......................................................................................................... 15 Lead-Based Paint ............................................................................................................................................ 15 Radon .............................................................................................................................................................. 15 Title Search ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 Wetlands .......................................................................................................................................................... 15 Mold ................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Vapor Encroachment Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 15 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances ............................................................................................................... 15 Data Gaps ............................................................................................................................................................ 16 Findings and Opinions ......................................................................................................................................... 17 RECs ................................................................................................................................................................ 17 Historical RECs ................................................................................................................................................ 17 Controlled RECs .............................................................................................................................................. 17 De Minimis Conditions ..................................................................................................................................... 17 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................... 18 References ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 Figures Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Appendices A Site Photographs B Interviews/Questionnaires C Regulatory Information D Historical Information E Previous Study F Client Provided G Personnel Qualifications Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Summary of Action At the request of Blue Sky Towers III, LLC (BST), and/or its Subsidiaries, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) was conducted by Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis), at a proposed communications site located at Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix (17.752397, -64.590752) hereinafter referred to as the “subject property”. This Phase I ESA was conducted in conformance with the scope and limitations of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E 1527-21 (Standard). Any exceptions to, or deviations from, the Standard are described in Section 1.0 of this report. Overview The subject property generally consists of undeveloped forested land. The subject property is referred to in this report as “East End.” It should be noted that the subject property is part of a larger tract of land, which will be treated as a separate and distinct entity from the subject property for the purpose of this assessment. This larger tract of land will be referred to as the "parent tract" in this document. Significant Data Gaps Historical Source Interval: Standard historical sources reviewed for the Phase I ESA were not available at the 5-year intervals described in Section 8.3.2.1 of the Standard. First Historical Development: Historical records before 1940 are unavailable. However, the site has consistently been depicted as a forest, matching its current use. Interviews: It is noted that interviews with the current property owner and the local fire department were not completed. This constitutes a data gap. Based on the information collected and reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA, the data gaps presented above are not likely to impact the overall ability to determine recognized environmental conditions at the subject property. Summary of Results The following potential environmental concerns were identified during the review of historical and/or regulatory information and from observations made during site reconnaissance activities. Potential Environmental Concerns RECs: None Historical RECs: None Controlled RECs: None De Minimis Conditions: None Recommendations Based on the results of this Phase I ESA, it is the opinion of Lotis that no further investigation is necessary at the subject property. Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The primary purpose of this study was to provide BST with sufficient information about recognized environmental conditions (RECs) associated with the subject property. SCOPE OF WORK The Scope of Work for this assessment included the following components: • Site Reconnaissance (to the extent possible) - Observations of Hazardous Substances/Petroleum Product Containers - Observations of Storage Tanks - Indications of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) - Indications of Solid Waste Disposal/Other • Records Review - Physical Setting Sources - Standard Environmental Record Sources - Historical Use Information • Interviews - Interviews with Owners and Occupants (if available during site visit and/or via telephone) - Interviews with Local Government Officials (when applicable) • Evaluation, Report Findings, and Recommendations summarized in this written Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA). SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS No significant assumptions were made during the completion of this study. LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS Lotis performed these services in a manner consistent with the level of care and expertise exercised by members of the environmental assessment profession and in accordance with the ASTM Standard for Phase I ESA which is “intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner defense to Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).” It is Lotis’ experience that environmental liabilities may be incurred that are in addition to those associated with CERCLA. Lotis is strictly limited to identifying RECs associated with the subject property as identified within the scope of work. Lotis’ assessment does not evaluate the structural conditions of any buildings on the subject property or for regulatory compliance issues. Lotis additionally did not assess the subject property for the potential of asbestos containing building materials, biological agents, cultural or historic resources, ecological resources, endangered species, health and safety concerns, indoor air quality unrelated to releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products into the environment, industrial hygiene concerns, lead-based paint, lead in drinking water, mold, radon, or wetlands. Non-assessed potential issues such as these can present environmental liabilities to a property owner but are generally considered “non-scope” items in the ASTM scope of work for Phase I ESAs. In addition, any limitations requested by BST are described herein. Additional limitations were not requested by BST. By not commenting on the presence of materials or the conduct of practices, Lotis does not confirm the absence of materials or the acceptability of site operations. Sampling of soils, groundwater, and surface water were not included within the scope of work for this project. Additionally, the site inspection activities did not include any attempt to identify the presence of environmental contamination that exists in areas that cannot be visually observed. This includes surface soils located under pavement, structures, Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 vehicles, or other media interference; subsurface soils; groundwater; areas in any buildings; or other areas on the property that are otherwise inaccessible due to locked or blocked accesses, geographic or vegetation impediments, weather interference, or size of the property. NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE. This report presents Lotis’ site reconnaissance observations, findings, and conclusions based on conditions as they existed at the time of the site reconnaissance. The findings presented in this report are based upon reasonably ascertainable information, available records, and site conditions observed during the ESA. Lotis makes no representation or warranty that past or current operations at the property are, or have been, in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and codes. Lotis makes no guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of information obtained from others during this Phase I ESA investigation. It is possible that information exists beyond the scope of this assessment, or that pertinent information was not provided to Lotis. Additional information subsequently provided, discovered, or produced may alter findings or conclusions presented in this Phase I ESA report. Lotis is under no obligation to update this report to reflect such subsequent information. The ASTM E1527-21 Standard recognizes inherent limitations for Phase I ESAs that apply to this report, including: • Uncertainty Not Eliminated – No Phase I ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property. Data gaps identified during this Phase I ESA are listed in Section 6.0. • Not Exhaustive – A Phase I ESA is not an exhaustive investigation. • Past Uses of the Property – A review of standard historical sources at intervals of less than five years is not required. BST is advised that the Phase I ESA conducted at the subject property is a limited inquiry into a property’s environmental status, cannot wholly eliminate uncertainty, and is not an exhaustive assessment to discover every potential source of environmental liability at the subject property. Therefore, Lotis does not make a statement: i) of warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied for any specific use; ii) that the subject property is free of RECs or environmental impairment; iii) that the subject property is “clean”; or iv) that impairments, if any, are limited to those that were discovered while Lotis was performing the Phase I ESA. This limiting statement is not meant to compromise the findings of this report; rather, it is meant as a statement of limitations within the ASTM Standard and intended scope of this assessment. Any site-specific limitations identified during the subject property reconnaissance are described in Section 2.2. Subsurface conditions may differ from the conditions implied by surface observations and can be evaluated more thoroughly through intrusive techniques that are beyond the scope of this assessment. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against the presence of operations or conditions of a type or at a location not assessed. Regardless of the findings stated in this report, Lotis is not responsible for consequences or conditions arising from facts that were not fully disclosed to Lotis prior to submission of this report. An independent data research company conducted the government agency database review referenced in this report. Information regarding surrounding area properties was requested for approximate minimum search distances. The information provided was assumed to be correct and complete unless obviously contradicted by Lotis’ observations or other credible reference sources reviewed during the assessment. Results of this assessment are based upon the visual site inspection of readily accessible areas of the subject property conducted by Lotis personnel, information from interviews with knowledgeable persons regarding the subject property, information reviewed regarding historical uses, information requested from regulatory agencies, and review of publicly available and practicably reviewable information identifying current and historical uses of the subject property and surrounding properties. All conclusions regarding this property represent the professional opinions of the Lotis personnel involved with this project. The findings of this report should not be considered a legal interpretation of existing environmental regulations. Lotis assumes no responsibility or liability for errors in the public data utilized, statements from sources outside of Lotis, or developments resulting from situations outside the scope of this project. DEVIATIONS There were no deviations from the ASTM E1527-21 Standard during the completion of this Phase I ESA report. Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 SITE DESCRIPTION GENERAL A current aerial photograph of the subject property and USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map showing the subject property and surrounding area are provided as Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. The subject property is located on the east side of South Shore Road, less than one-eighth mile north of Buck Road. The latitude/longitude of the subject property is 17.752397, -64.590752, and the elevation of the subject property is approximately 160 feet above mean sea level. SITE RECONNAISSANCE Lotis performed a site reconnaissance on May 16, 2024 and was unaccompanied during the site visit. The site inspector reported the findings of the site reconnaissance to environmental professional(s) for review. The purpose of the reconnaissance was to evaluate the subject property, to observe adjoining/nearby properties, and to identify unlisted properties in the area that may affect the subject property. Photographs from the site reconnaissance are provided as Appendix A. The area of the subject property was walked, as its small area did not necessitate the use of a grid search pattern. 2.2.1 Current Uses of the Subject Property: The subject property is currently undeveloped forested land. The table below summarizes the findings from the site reconnaissance, including on-site features, limitations, as well as observations of temperature and precipitation: Site Feature Description Communications Tower(s) None Fenced No Equipment Cabinet(s) No Equipment Shelter(s) None Electrical Service None Electric Meter(s) None Generator(s)/Observed or Indicated None Surface Material Dirt and vegetation Topography Hilly Vegetation Lush and abundant Temperature at Time of Visit 90°F Precipitation None Limitations Vegetation Other None Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 2.2.2 Site Visit Observations for the Subject Property The following is a summary of information based on exterior observations completed during the Phase I ESA site visit. Items of Potential Environmental Concern Observed on the Subject Property Notes: Potable Water Supply/Source No Sewage Disposal System No Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products No Underground Storage Tanks No Contents Quantity Size Staining Propane Diesel Aboveground Storage Tanks No Contents Quantity Size Staining Propane Diesel Odors No Standing Liquids No Drums No Contents Quantity Staining Unidentified Substance Containers No Transformer(s) No Pad Pole PCB Free Staining Pits, Ponds and Lagoons No Stained Soil or Pavement No Stressed Vegetation No Solid Waste Disposal No Indications of Fill Materials No Heating and Cooling No Drains and Sumps No Evidence of Trash Burning No Stormwater No Wells No Septic System No General Housekeeping Concerns No Other Conditions of Concern No Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 2.2.3 Current Uses of Adjacent/Nearby Properties: Current visible uses of adjacent and nearby properties include the following as viewed from the subject property to the: Direction Adjacent/Proximate Properties North: Forested East: Forested South: Forested West: Forested 2.2.4 Site Visit Observations for Adjacent Properties The following is a summary of information based on exterior observations completed during the Phase I ESA site visit. Items of Potential Environmental Concern Observed on the Adjacent Properties Notes: Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products No Underground Storage Tanks No Aboveground Storage Tanks No Standing Liquids No Drums No Unidentified Substance Containers No Transformer(s) No Pad Pole PCB Free Staining Pits, Ponds and Lagoons No Stained Soil or Pavement No Stressed Vegetation No Indications of Fill Materials No Evidence of Trash Burning No General Housekeeping Concerns No Other Conditions of Concern No Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 ENVIRONMENTAL AND HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW PHYSICAL SETTING 3.1.1 General Topographic Setting Review of the United States Geological Survey (USGS), Grass point, VI 7.5-Minute Quadrangle map indicates that the regional topography generally slopes in a south-southwesterly gradient. The soil surface texture in the vicinity of the subject property is loam and the soil drainage is considered well drained. 3.1.2 Surface Water No surface water that indicated a potential environmental concern was observed on the subject property or adjacent properties during the site visit. 3.1.3 Groundwater Wells and Depth Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) searches and summarizes data on wells and groundwater depth from public databases. The number and type of wells is listed in the Physical Setting Report (PSR) located in Appendix C of this report. However, it should be noted that groundwater depth fluctuates based on several factors. If the actual groundwater depth needs to be determined, a site specific groundwater survey should be completed. 3.1.4 Groundwater Flow Groundwater flow direction at the subject property is not known. However, based on topographic gradient, the direction of groundwater flow in the general area of the subject property is estimated to be in a south-southwesterly direction. Groundwater beneath the subject property is of concern when there are properties located upgradient of the subject property that may have environmental concerns. Section 3.4 provides additional information on identified upgradient properties with current or historical environmental concerns. It is important to note that although groundwater flow direction can be interpreted based on topography, the actual measurement of groundwater levels and potentiometric surface mapping is beyond the scope of work for this project. Measurement of groundwater levels and potentiometric surface mapping is the only accurate means of determining groundwater flow direction and gradient. Additionally, localized factors such as the presence of undocumented or unregistered pumping wells or other subsurface obstructions, seasonal fluctuations in precipitation, geologic heterogeneity, and nearby surface waters may also significantly influence groundwater gradient and flow direction at the subject property. Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION Consulting historical sources helps to establish the history of the property and its surroundings, with the aim of determining the probability of recognized environmental conditions resulting from past uses. Standard historical sources, as defined by ASTM, consist of various materials such as aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, property tax files, recorded land title records, USGS topographic maps, local street directories, building department records, zoning/land use records, as well as other credible historical sources that reveal the property's past uses. Lotis carried out an investigation of standard historical records that were readily available and reliable to document all observable past uses of the property, dating back to its first development, which may have involved agricultural use or the placement of fill dirt. This research covered the period up to the earlier of the property's first developed use or the year 1940. According to ASTM, this task only requires examining those standard historical sources identified in 8.3.4.1 through 8.3.4.8 that are both reasonably ascertainable and likely to be beneficial (as described under Data Failure in 8.3.2.3). If the property was originally developed for agricultural use, it may not be possible to obtain records that are easily accessible and reliable to document the date of the property's initial development. An acceptable historical source may be disregarded in two situations. Firstly, if the source is not reasonably ascertainable, and secondly, if previous experience suggests that it is not likely to be adequate in terms of defining the property's uses in a useful, accurate, or comprehensive manner. Although other historical sources that are listed in 8.3.4.9 of the ASTM Practice E1527-21 can be used to meet the ASTM requirement for identifying past uses of the property, they are not obligated to follow this practice. The determination of past uses is based on examining only those standard historical sources outlined in 8.3.4.1 through 8.3.4.8 that are necessary and reasonably ascertainable, and expected to be useful. The following historical reference materials were utilized to determine prior use of the subject property and adjacent/nearby properties: ERIS Historic Aerials Report – 1954, 1971, 1977, 1999, 2004, 2007, and 2019. ERIS Fire Insurance Maps - Fire Insurance Maps were ordered by Lotis through ERIS for historical information relative to the subject property and surrounding area. However, ERIS indicated that the subject property is an unmapped property. A copy of the letter is included in Appendix D of this report. Local Street Directories – Based on the use of the subject property as a communications site, it is unlikely that Local Street Directories would identify any pertinent information associated with the subject property. Physical characteristic changes for the subject and adjacent/nearby properties were observed as follows: Historic Uses Summary Year Subject Property Use Adjacent/Nearby Property Use North East South West 1954 Undeveloped – Forested Land Undeveloped – Forested Land Undeveloped – Forested Land Undeveloped – Forested Land Undeveloped – Forested Land 2019 Undeveloped – Forested Land Undeveloped – Forested Land Undeveloped – Forested Land Undeveloped – Forested Land Undeveloped – Forested Land SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS Lotis was not provided a previous Phase I ESA for the subject property, as reflected in Appendix E. Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 STATE STANDARD AND FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES ERIS was utilized to conduct a database search of environmental records. The search radius of the ERIS Database Report (ERIS Report) meets or exceeds the government records search requirements of the ASTM Standard E1527-21 for Phase I ESAs. The ERIS Report is provided as Appendix C and contains definitions of searched for acronyms. The below table provides the summary of the databases searched by ERIS and findings of each, i.e. number of sites identified within the search radius. Within the one-mile radius of the subject property, no sites were identified on the federal and/or state databases. One unplottable site, those sites not mapped due to poor or inadequate address information, was identified. During the site visit, the unplottable site was not observed near the subject property. Environmental Risk Information Services Summary Database * Total Site(s) Database * Total Site(s) DOE FUSRAP 0 SHWS 0 NPL 0 DELISTED CONTAM 0 PROPOSED NPL 0 DELISTED SHWS 0 DELETED NPL 0 SITE CLEANUP 0 SEMS 0 SWF/LF 0 SEMS ARCHIVE 0 WASTE 0 ODI 0 RECYCLING 0 IODI 0 LUST 0 CERCLIS 0 DELISTED LUST 0 CERCLIS NFRAP 0 LST 0 CERCLIS LIENS 0 UST 0 RCRA CORRACTS 0 AST 0 RCRA TSD 0 UNREG TANK 0 RCRA LQG 0 TANK FACILITY 0 RCRA SQG 0 DELISTED TANK 0 RCRA VSQG 0 AUL 0 RCRA NON GEN 0 BROWNFIELD (state) 0 RCRA CONTROLS 0 VCP 0 FED ENG 0 VAPOR 0 FED INST 0 CBS 0 LUCIS 0 INDIAN LUST 0 NPL IC 0 INDIAN UST 0 ERNS 1982 to 1986 0 DELISTED INDIAN UST 0 ERNS 1987 to 1989 0 DELISTED INDIAN LST 0 ERNS 0 FINDS/FRS 0 FED BROWNFIELDS 0 PFAS 0 FEMA UST 0 HMIRS 0 FRP 0 DRYCLEANER 0 DELISTED FRP 0 DELISTED DRYCLEANER 0 HIST GAS STATIONS 0 MINES 0 REFN 0 ALT FUELS 0 BULK Terminal 0 PCB 0 SEMS LIEN 0 SPILLS 0 SUPERFUND ROD 0 LIEN 0 Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 ENVIRONMENTAL AND HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW CURRENT OWNER/OPERATORS/SITE OCCUPANTS/SITE MANAGER Lotis has not yet received a response from the property owner, Mr. Mike Lohman. An updated report will be issued once a response is received. LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS Lotis attempted to interview at least one staff member of the Cotton Valley Fire Department to obtain information indicating RECs in connection with the subject property; however, contact could not be established. If a response is received that identifies environmental concerns an addendum to this report will be issued. ADDITIONAL INTERVIEWS No additional interviews were completed. USER QUESTIONNAIRE A completed User Questionnaire was not provided to Lotis by the User. Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 NON-SCOPE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS No structures were located onsite at the time of the inspection and no asbestos containing materials were noted onsite. LEAD-BASED PAINT No painted surfaces were noted onsite. RADON No Radon information is available for the area of the subject property. However, based on the commercial nature of the subject property, radon should not be a concern. TITLE SEARCH No title records were provided to Lotis by the User. WETLANDS The ERIS Database Report includes general information relative to wetlands and flood zones. No wetland or flood zone areas were identified on or adjacent to the subject property. MOLD None observed. VAPOR ENCROACHMENT CONDITIONS This assessment included review of the regulatory database discussed above in relation to section 3.4 of the ASTM E2600- 10 Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions. If soil or groundwater is contaminated with a volatile compound (that is, something that can escape from water or soil to air, such as gasoline and solvents), that contaminant can migrate through the soil and present in the air inside of buildings, especially within basement areas. The ASTM E2600-10 standard designates this a Vapor Encroachment Condition (VEC). Soil vapors do not necessarily migrate along groundwater flow paths. Vapors can migrate via hydraulic gradients and may extend beyond a groundwater plume. Vapor intrusion has been identified at a significant number of sites and state and federal environmental regulators have "reopened" numerous spill and waste cases to assess whether a VEC assessment is warranted. None of the information obtained/reviewed as part of this assessment suggested the potential for a VEC at the subject property. PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) are widely used, long lasting chemicals, components of which break down very slowly over time. Because of their widespread use and their persistence in the environment, many PFAS are found in the water, air, fish and soil at locations across the globe. Scientific studies have shown that exposure the PFAS in the environment may be linked to harmful health effects in humans and animals. There are thousands of PFAS chemicals, and they are found in many different consumer, commercial, and industrial products. The List of conditions where PFAS could be identified as a potential environmental concern are numerous (manufacturing operations, car washes, tanneries, former junk yards, sites where firefighting foam may have been used, etc.). None of the information obtained/reviewed as part of this assessment suggested a PFAS concern at the subject property. Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 DATA GAPS A data gap, as defined in the ASTM Standard E1527-21, is an absence of information that affects the ability of the environmental professional to identify RECs. The following data gaps were identified in the Phase I ESA: Historical Source Interval: Standard historical sources reviewed for the Phase I ESA were not available at the 5- year intervals described in Section 8.3.2.1 of the Standard. First Historical Development: Historical information does not date back to 1940. However the earliest map predates construction of the existing/proposed telecommunications site, which will be the first known development of the subject property. Interviews: It is noted that interviews with the current property owner and the local fire department were not completed. This constitutes a data gap. However, given the comprehensive review of additional data conducted for this report, Lotis does not consider this data gap to be of significant concern. Based on the information collected and reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA, the data gaps presented above are not likely to impact the overall ability to determine recognized environmental conditions at the subject property. Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS RECS ASTM defines recognized environmental conditions (RECs) as “the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.” This Phase I ESA has identified no RECs in connection with the subject property. HISTORICAL RECS ASTM defines historical recognized environmental conditions (HRECs) as “a previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum products affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities and meeting unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory authority or authorities without subjecting the subject property to any controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations).” This Phase I ESA has identified no HRECs in connection with the subject property. CONTROLLED RECS ASTM defines controlled recognized environmental conditions (CRECs) as “a recognized environmental condition affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to implementation of required controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations).” This Phase I ESA has identified no CRECs in connection with the subject property. DE MINIMIS CONDITIONS ASTM defines de minimis conditions (de minimis) as “a condition related to a release that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.” This Phase I ESA has identified no de minimis conditions in connection with the subject property. Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of the Phase I ESA, Lotis does not recommend further investigation at this time. Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 REFERENCES Site Reconnaissance Phase I ESA Site Reconnaissance Checklist and Photos. May 16, 2024. Regulatory Environmental Risk Information Services, Database Report, Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix. Order Number: 24052200607. May 23, 2024. Environmental Risk Information Services, Physical Setting Report, Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix. Order Number: 23110300488p. June 06, 2024. Environmental Risk Information Services, Historical Aerials, Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix. Order Number: 23110300488. June 12, 2024. Environmental Risk Information Services, Fire Insurance Maps, Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix. Order Number: 23110300488. May 28, 2024. Previous Studies None Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 Figures Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Topographic Map Figure 1 Vicinity Map Blue Sky Towers III, LLC Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix 00820 Subject Property Figure 2 USGS Topographic Map Blue Sky Towers III, LLC Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix 00820 Subject Property Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 Appendices Appendix A Site Photographs Appendix B Interviews/Questionnaires Appendix C Regulatory Information Appendix D Historical Information Appendix E Previous Study Appendix F Client Provided Documents Appendix G Personnel Qualifications Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 Appendix A Site Photographs Overview of entire lease area View of the Subject Property View of the Subject Property View of the Subject Property Photographed: May 16, 2024 Site Photographs East End USVI-00230 Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix 00820 View of the north adjacent property View of the east adjacent property View of the south adjacent property View of the west adjacent property Photographed: May 16, 2024 Site Photographs East End USVI-00230 Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix 00820 Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 Appendix B Interviews/Questionnaires Lotis Interviewer Interview Date Site ID Site Name Site Address Key Site Personnel Phone Number Relationship to Property The objective of this telephone interview is to obtain information indicating recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. 1. Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property that are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state or local law? If yes, describe. 1. Are you aware of any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the site and/or have been filed or recorded in a registry under federal, tribal, state or local law? If yes, describe. 2. Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property (40 CFR 312.30): a. Do you know the past uses of the property? If yes, what were they? b. Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? c. Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? d. Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? 3. When was the property acquired by the current owner? 4. What year was the communications tower constructed? Other pertinent information Anna Pearson East End Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter St. Croix 00820 Lohman Mike Mr. Lotis Environmental, LLC 8899 Main Street, Suite 107 Williamsville, New York 14221 KEY SITE PERSONNEL TELEPHONE INTERVIEW FORM USVI-00230 Lotis Interviewer Interview Date Site ID Site Name Site Address Fire Department or other Emergency Response Agency Representative Phone Number The objective of this telephone interview is to obtain information indicating recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. 1. Are you aware of any environmental concerns at the subject property? 1. Has your department ever responded to an environmental emergency at the subject property? Other pertinent information Anna Pearson Cotton Valley (340) 773-9670 6/4/2024 Lotis called on 5/22/2024, 5/28/2024, 6/4/2024, but did not receive a response. East End USVI-00230 Lotis Environmental, LLC 8899 Main Street, Suite 107 Williamsville, New York 14221 LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE INTERVIEW FORM Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter St. Croix 00820 Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 Appendix C Regulatory Information 1 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p Property Information Order Number: 23110300488p Date Completed: June 6, 2024 Project Number: BST_228 Project Property: USVI-00230 East End Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter VI 00820 Coordinates: Latitude: 17.752397 Longitude: -64.590752 UTM Northing: 1963506.03465 Meters UTM Easting: 331347.606472 Meters UTM Zone: UTM Zone 20Q Elevation: 159.83 ft Slope Direction: SSW Topographic Information........................................................................................................................................2 Hydrologic Information...........................................................................................................................................4 Geologic Information..............................................................................................................................................9 Soil Information....................................................................................................................................................11 Wells and Additional Sources..............................................................................................................................21 Summary..........................................................................................................................................................22 Detail Report....................................................................................................................................................23 Radon Information...............................................................................................................................................26 Appendix..............................................................................................................................................................27 Liability Notice......................................................................................................................................................29 The ERIS Physical Setting Report - PSR provides comprehensive information about the physical setting around a site and includes a complete overview of topography and surface topology, in addition to hydrologic, geologic and soil characteristics. The location and detailed attributes of oil and gas wells, water wells, public water systems and radon are also included for review. The compilation of both physical characteristics of a site and additional attribute data is useful in assessing the impact of migration of contaminants and subsequent impact on soils and groundwater. Disclaimer This Report does not provide a full environmental evaluation for the site or adjacent properties. Please see the terms and disclaimer at the end of the Report for greater detail. Topographic Information Topographic Information 3 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p The previous topographic map(s) are created by seamlessly merging and cutting current USGS topographic data. Below are shaded relief map(s), derived from USGS elevation data to show surrounding topography in further detail. Topographic information at project property: Elevation: 159.83 ft Slope Direction: SSW Hydrologic Information Hydrologic Information Hydrologic Information 6 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p The Wetland Type map shows wetland existence overlaid on an aerial imagery. The Flood Hazard Zones map shows FEMA flood hazard zones overlaid on an aerial imagery. Relevant FIRM panels and detailed zone information is provided below. For detailed Zone descriptions please click the link: https://floodadvocate.com/fema-zone-definitions Available FIRM Panels in area: 7800000076G(effective:2007-04-16) 7800000075G(effective:2007-04-16) Flood Zone A-01 Zone: A Zone subtype: Flood Zone AE-01 Zone: AE Zone subtype: Flood Zone VE-01 Zone: VE Zone subtype: Flood Zone X-12 Zone: X Zone subtype: AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD Hydrologic Information FEMA Flood Zone Definitions Special Flood Hazard Areas – High Risk Special Flood Hazard Areas represent the area subject to inundation by 1-percent-annual chance flood. Structures located within the SFHA have a 26- percent chance of flooding during the life of a standard 30-year mortgage. Federal floodplain management regulations and mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply in these zones. ZONE DESCRIPTION A Areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event. Because detailed hydraulic analyses have not been performed, no Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) or flood depths are shown. AE, A1-A30 Areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event determined by detailed methods. BFEs are shown within these zones. (Zone AE is used on new and revised maps in place of Zones A1–A30.) AH Areas subject to inundation by 1-percent-annual-chance shallow flooding (usually areas of ponding) where average depths are 1–3 feet. BFEs derived from detailed hydraulic analyses are shown in this zone. AO Areas subject to inundation by 1-percent-annual-chance shallow flooding (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain) where average depths are 1–3 feet. Average flood depths derived from detailed hydraulic analyses are shown within this zone. AR Areas that result from the decertification of a previously accredited flood protection system that is determined to be in the process of being restored to provide base flood protection. A99 Areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event, but which will ultimately be protected upon completion of an under-construction Federal flood protection system. These are areas of special flood hazard where enough progress has been made on the construction of a protection system, such as dikes, dams, and levees, to consider it complete for insurance rating purposes. Zone A99 may be used only when the flood protection system has reached specified statutory progress toward completion. No BFEs or flood depths are shown. Coastal High Hazard Areas – High Risk Coastal High Hazard Areas (CHHA) represent the area subject to inundation by 1-percent-annual chance flood, extending from offshore to the inland limit of a primary front al dune along an open coast and any other area subject to high velocity wave action from storms or seismic sources. Structures located within the CHHA have a 26-percent chance of flooding during the life of a standard 30-year mortgage. Federal floodplain management regulations and mandatory purchase requirements apply in these zones. ZONE DESCRIPTION V Areas along coasts subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event with additional hazards associated with storm-induced waves. Because detailed coastal analyses have not been performed, no BFEs or flood depths are shown. VE, V1-V30 Areas along coasts subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event with additional hazards due to storm- induced velocity wave action. BFEs derived from detailed hydraulic coastal analyses are shown within these zones. (Zone VE is used on new and revised maps in place of Zones V1–V30.) Hydrologic Information Moderate and Minimal Risk Areas Areas of moderate or minimal hazard are studied based upon the principal source of flood in the area. However, buildings in these zones could be flooded by severe, concentrated rainfall coupled with inadequate local drainage systems. Local stormwater drainage systems are not normally considered in a community's flood insurance study. The failure of a local drainage system can create areas of high flood risk within these zones. Flood insurance is available in participating communities, but is not required by regulation in these zones. Nearly 25-percent of all flood claims filed are for structures located within these zones. ZONE DESCRIPTION B, X (shaded) Moderate risk areas within the 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain, areas of 1-percent-annual-chance flooding where average depths are less than 1 foot, areas of 1-percent-annual-chance flooding where the contributing drainage area is less than 1 square mile, and areas protected from the 1-percent-annual-chance flood by a levee. No BFEs or base flood depths are shown within these zones. (Zone X (shaded) is used on new and revised maps in place of Zone B.) C, X (unshaded) Minimal risk areas outside the 1-percent and .2-percent-annual-chance floodplains. No BFEs or base flood depths are shown within these zones. (Zone X (unshaded) is used on new and revised maps in place of Zone C.) Undetermined Risk Areas ZONE DESCRIPTION D Unstudied areas where flood hazards are undetermined, but flooding is possible. No mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply, but coverage is available in participating communities. Geologic Information Geologic Information 10 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p The previous page shows USGS geology information. Detailed information about each unit is provided below. No records found for the project property or surrounding properties. Soil Information Soil Information 12 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p The previous page shows a soil map using SSURGO data from USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Detailed information about each unit is provided below. Map Unit CvD (1.37%) Map Unit Name: Cramer-Victory complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes, very stony Bedrock Depth - Min: 38cm Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant: D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Cramer(50%) horizon H1(0cm to 23cm) Gravelly clay loam horizon H2(23cm to 48cm) Gravelly clay horizon H3(48cm to 81cm) Weathered bedrock horizon H4(81cm to 152cm) Unweathered bedrock Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: CvD - Cramer-Victory complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes, very stony Component: Cramer (50%) The Cramer component makes up 50 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 12 to 20 percent. This component is on hills on hills, mountain slopes on mountains, ridges on mountains. The parent material consists of weathered material. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 10 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very low. Shrink-swell potential is high. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 7 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 5 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Victory (30%) The Victory component makes up 30 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 12 to 20 percent. This component is on ridges. The parent material consists of weathered material. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 3 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Maho Bay (10%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Maho Bay soil is a minor component. Component: Parasol (10%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Parasol soil is a minor component. Map Unit CvE (2.56%) Map Unit Name: Cramer-Victory complex, 20 to 40 percent slopes, very stony Bedrock Depth - Min: 38cm Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained Soil Information 13 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p Hydrologic Group - Dominant: D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Cramer(50%) horizon H1(0cm to 23cm) Gravelly clay loam horizon H2(23cm to 48cm) Gravelly clay horizon H3(48cm to 81cm) Weathered bedrock horizon H4(81cm to 152cm) Unweathered bedrock Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: CvE - Cramer-Victory complex, 20 to 40 percent slopes, very stony Component: Cramer (50%) The Cramer component makes up 50 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 20 to 40 percent. This component is on hills on hills, mountain slopes on mountains, ridges on mountains. The parent material consists of weathered material. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 10 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very low. Shrink-swell potential is high. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 7 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 5 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Victory (30%) The Victory component makes up 30 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 20 to 40 percent. This component is on ridges. The parent material consists of weathered material. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 3 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Parasol (10%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Parasol soil is a minor component. Component: Maho Bay (10%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Maho Bay soil is a minor component. Map Unit GyB (1.0%) Map Unit Name: Glynn gravelly loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min: null Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant: C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted. Major components are printed below Glynn(85%) horizon H1(0cm to 10cm) Gravelly loam horizon H2(10cm to 25cm) Gravelly clay loam horizon H3(25cm to 43cm) Very gravelly clay horizon H4(43cm to 69cm) Very gravelly clay loam horizon H5(69cm to 81cm) Very gravelly sandy clay loam horizon H6(81cm to 104cm) Very gravelly clay horizon H7(104cm to 152cm) Very gravelly sandy clay loam Component Description: Soil Information 14 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: GyB - Glynn gravelly loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes Component: Glynn (85%) The Glynn component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 5 percent. This component is on alluvial fans on uplands, terraces on uplands. The parent material consists of stratified alluvial sediments weathered from volcanic residuum. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 4 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2c. Irrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 23 percent. The soil has a very slightly saline horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 30 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Arawak (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Arawak soil is a minor component. Component: Hesselberg (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Hesselberg soil is a minor component. Component: Carib (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Carib soil is a minor component. Component: Aquents (2%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Aquents soil is a minor component. Component: Solitude (2%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Solitude soil is a minor component. Component: Sion (2%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Sion soil is a minor component. Map Unit GyC (0.75%) Map Unit Name: Glynn gravelly loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min: null Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant: C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted. Major components are printed below Glynn(85%) horizon H1(0cm to 10cm) Gravelly loam horizon H2(10cm to 25cm) Gravelly clay loam horizon H3(25cm to 43cm) Very gravelly clay horizon H4(43cm to 69cm) Very gravelly clay loam horizon H5(69cm to 81cm) Very gravelly sandy clay loam horizon H6(81cm to 104cm) Very gravelly clay horizon H7(104cm to 152cm) Very gravelly sandy clay loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: GyC - Glynn gravelly loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes Component: Glynn (85%) The Glynn component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 5 to 12 percent. This component is on alluvial fans on uplands, terraces on uplands. The parent material consists of stratified alluvial sediments weathered from volcanic residuum. Depth to Soil Information 15 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 4 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2c. Irrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 23 percent. The soil has a very slightly saline horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 30 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Hesselberg (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Hesselberg soil is a minor component. Component: Sion (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Sion soil is a minor component. Component: Solitude (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Solitude soil is a minor component. Component: Carib (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Carib soil is a minor component. Component: Arawak (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Arawak soil is a minor component. Map Unit JaB (0.22%) Map Unit Name: Jaucas sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min: null Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null Drainage Class - Dominant: Excessively drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant: A - Soils in this group have low runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water is transmitted freely through the soil. Major components are printed below Jaucas(85%) horizon H1(0cm to 15cm) Sand horizon H2(15cm to 152cm) Sand Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: JaB - Jaucas sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes Component: Jaucas (85%) The Jaucas component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 5 percent. This component is on beaches on coastal plains. The parent material consists of deposits of calcareous sand. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is excessively drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is very high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 7s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 30 percent. The soil has a moderately saline horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 5 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Glynn (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Glynn soil is a minor component. Component: Sugar Beach (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Sugar Beach soil is a minor component. Component: Solitude (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Solitude soil is a minor component. Component: Sandy Point (3%) Soil Information 16 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Sandy Point soil is a minor component. Component: Cinnamon Bay (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Cinnamon Bay soil is a minor component. Map Unit SrD (0.09%) Map Unit Name: Southgate-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min: 0cm Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant: D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Southgate(45%) horizon H1(0cm to 13cm) Gravelly loam horizon H2(13cm to 25cm) Very gravelly loam horizon H3(25cm to 43cm) Weathered bedrock horizon H4(43cm to 152cm) Unweathered bedrock Rock outcrop(40%) horizon H1(0cm to 152cm) Unweathered bedrock Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: SrD - Southgate-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes Component: Southgate (45%) The Southgate component makes up 45 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 12 to 20 percent. This component is on hillslopes on hills, mountain slopes on mountains, ridges on mountains. The parent material consists of weathered material. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 10 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 7s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 3 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Rock outcrop (40%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Rock outcrop is a miscellaneous area. Component: Cramer (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Cramer soil is a minor component. Component: Jealousy (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Jealousy soil is a minor component. Component: Maho Bay (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Maho Bay soil is a minor component. Component: Parasol (2%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Parasol soil is a minor component. Map Unit SrE (0.37%) Map Unit Name: Southgate-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 40 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min: 0cm Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null Soil Information 17 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant: D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Southgate(45%) horizon H1(0cm to 13cm) Gravelly loam horizon H2(13cm to 25cm) Very gravelly loam horizon H3(25cm to 43cm) Weathered bedrock horizon H4(43cm to 152cm) Unweathered bedrock Rock outcrop(40%) horizon H1(0cm to 152cm) Unweathered bedrock Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: SrE - Southgate-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 40 percent slopes Component: Southgate (45%) The Southgate component makes up 45 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 20 to 40 percent. This component is on hillslopes on hills, mountain slopes on mountains, ridges on mountains. The parent material consists of weathered material. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 10 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 7s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 3 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Rock outcrop (40%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Rock outcrop is a miscellaneous area. Component: Jealousy (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Jealousy soil is a minor component. Component: Cramer (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Cramer soil is a minor component. Component: Maho Bay (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Maho Bay soil is a minor component. Component: Parasol (2%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Parasol soil is a minor component. Map Unit SrF (0.19%) Map Unit Name: Southgate-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 60 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min: 0cm Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant: D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Southgate(45%) horizon H1(0cm to 13cm) Gravelly loam horizon H2(13cm to 25cm) Very gravelly loam horizon H3(25cm to 43cm) Weathered bedrock horizon H4(43cm to 152cm) Unweathered bedrock Rock outcrop(40%) horizon H1(0cm to 152cm) Unweathered bedrock Soil Information 18 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: SrF - Southgate-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 60 percent slopes Component: Southgate (45%) The Southgate component makes up 45 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 40 to 60 percent. This component is on hillslopes on hills, mountain slopes on mountains, ridges on mountains. The parent material consists of weathered material. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 10 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 7s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 3 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Rock outcrop (40%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Rock outcrop is a miscellaneous area. Component: Cramer (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Cramer soil is a minor component. Component: Jealousy (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Jealousy soil is a minor component. Component: Maho Bay (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Maho Bay soil is a minor component. Component: Parasol (2%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Parasol soil is a minor component. Map Unit VsE (1.59%) Map Unit Name: Victory-Southgate complex, 20 to 40 percent slopes, very stony Bedrock Depth - Min: 38cm Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant: C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted. Major components are printed below Victory(45%) horizon H1(0cm to 28cm) Loam horizon H2(28cm to 51cm) Very gravelly loam horizon H3(51cm to 84cm) Very gravelly loam horizon H4(84cm to 127cm) Bedrock horizon H5(127cm to 152cm) Bedrock Southgate(40%) horizon H1(0cm to 13cm) Gravelly loam horizon H2(13cm to 25cm) Very gravelly loam horizon H3(25cm to 43cm) Weathered bedrock horizon H4(43cm to 152cm) Unweathered bedrock Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: VsE - Victory-Southgate complex, 20 to 40 percent slopes, very stony Component: Victory (45%) The Victory component makes up 45 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 20 to 40 percent. This component is on ridges. The parent Soil Information 19 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p material consists of weathered material. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 3 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Southgate (40%) The Southgate component makes up 40 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 20 to 40 percent. This component is on hillslopes on hills, mountain slopes on mountains, ridges on mountains. The parent material consists of weathered material. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 10 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 3 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Cramer (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Cramer soil is a minor component. Component: Jealousy (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Jealousy soil is a minor component. Component: Maho Bay (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Maho Bay soil is a minor component. Component: Parasol (2%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Parasol soil is a minor component. Map Unit VsF (91.84%) Map Unit Name: Victory-Southgate complex, 40 to 70 percent slopes, very stony Bedrock Depth - Min: 38cm Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant: C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted. Major components are printed below Victory(45%) horizon H1(0cm to 28cm) Loam horizon H2(28cm to 51cm) Very gravelly loam horizon H3(51cm to 84cm) Very gravelly loam horizon H4(84cm to 127cm) Bedrock horizon H5(127cm to 152cm) Bedrock Southgate(40%) horizon H1(0cm to 13cm) Gravelly loam horizon H2(13cm to 25cm) Very gravelly loam horizon H3(25cm to 43cm) Weathered bedrock horizon H4(43cm to 152cm) Unweathered bedrock Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: VsF - Victory-Southgate complex, 40 to 70 percent slopes, very stony Component: Victory (45%) The Victory component makes up 45 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 40 to 70 percent. This component is on ridges. The parent material consists of weathered material. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage Soil Information 20 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 7s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 3 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Southgate (40%) The Southgate component makes up 40 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 40 to 70 percent. This component is on hillslopes on hills, mountain slopes on mountains, ridges on mountains. The parent material consists of weathered material. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 10 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 7s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface. The soil has a maximum sodium adsorption ratio of 3 within 30 inches of the soil surface. Component: Jealousy (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Jealousy soil is a minor component. Component: Cramer (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Cramer soil is a minor component. Component: Maho Bay (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Maho Bay soil is a minor component. Component: Parasol (2%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Parasol soil is a minor component. Map Unit W (0.02%) Map Unit Name: Water No more attributes available for this map unit Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: W - Water Component: Water (100%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Water is a miscellaneous area. Wells and Additional Sources Wells and Additional Sources Summary 22 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p Federal Sources Public Water Systems Violations and Enforcement Data Map Key ID Distance (ft) Direction No records found Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) Map Key ID Distance (ft) Direction No records found USGS National Water Information System Map Key Site No Distance (ft) Direction 1 USGS-174504064353800 1514.58 SW 2 USGS-174504064354000 1642.31 SW 3 USGS-174503064354200 1850.38 SW 4 USGS-174459064354400 2274.82 SW 5 USGS-174516064360400 3459.37 W 6 USGS-174518064360600 3659.75 W 7 USGS-50331001 3849.81 W 8 USGS-174513064360800 3855.68 W Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 23 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p USGS National Water Information System Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 1 SW 0.29 1,514.58 16.96 FED USGS Site No: USGS-174504064353800 Site Type: Well Formation Type: Date Drilled: Well Depth: Well Depth Unit: Well Hole Depth: Well Hole Depth Unit: Reporting Agency: USGS Puerto Rico Water Science Center Station Name: GRAPETREE 3 WELL, ST. CROIX, USVI Latitude: 17.74914023000000 Longitude: -64.5934719900000 Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 2 SW 0.31 1,642.31 24.31 FED USGS Site No: USGS-174504064354000 Site Type: Well Formation Type: Date Drilled: Well Depth: Well Depth Unit: Well Hole Depth: Well Hole Depth Unit: Reporting Agency: USGS Puerto Rico Water Science Center Station Name: GRAPETREE 2 WELL, ST. CROIX, USVI Latitude: 17.74914023000000 Longitude: -64.5940275700000 Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 3 SW 0.35 1,850.38 25.42 FED USGS Site No: USGS-174503064354200 Site Type: Well Formation Type: Date Drilled: Well Depth: Well Depth Unit: Well Hole Depth: Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 24 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p Well Hole Depth Unit: Reporting Agency: USGS Puerto Rico Water Science Center Station Name: GRAPETREE 1 WELL, ST. CROIX, USVI Latitude: 17.74886245000000 Longitude: -64.5945832000000 Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 4 SW 0.43 2,274.82 16.87 FED USGS Site No: USGS-174459064354400 Site Type: Well Formation Type: Date Drilled: 1986 Well Depth: 11.65 Well Depth Unit: ft Well Hole Depth: Well Hole Depth Unit: Reporting Agency: USGS Puerto Rico Water Science Center Station Name: RBUS WELL, ST. CROIX, USVI Latitude: 17.74775136000000 Longitude: -64.5951387000000 Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 5 W 0.66 3,459.37 29.30 FED USGS Site No: USGS-174516064360400 Site Type: Well Formation Type: Date Drilled: Well Depth: 40 Well Depth Unit: ft Well Hole Depth: Well Hole Depth Unit: Reporting Agency: USGS Puerto Rico Water Science Center Station Name: WEST INDIES 1 WELL, ST. CROIX, USVI Latitude: 17.75247353000000 Longitude: -64.6006945900000 Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 6 W 0.69 3,659.75 15.94 FED USGS Site No: USGS-174518064360600 Site Type: Well Formation Type: Date Drilled: Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 25 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p Well Depth: 12 Well Depth Unit: ft Well Hole Depth: Well Hole Depth Unit: Reporting Agency: USGS Puerto Rico Water Science Center Station Name: WEST INDIES 2 WELL, ST. CROIX, USVI Latitude: 17.75302908000000 Longitude: -64.6012501700000 Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 7 W 0.73 3,849.81 22.38 FED USGS Site No: USGS-50331001 Site Type: Atmosphere Formation Type: Date Drilled: Well Depth: Well Depth Unit: Well Hole Depth: Well Hole Depth Unit: Reporting Agency: USGS Puerto Rico Water Science Center Station Name: TEAGUES BAY RAINGAGE, ST. CROIX USVI Latitude: 17.75191798000000 Longitude: -64.6018058000000 Map Key Direction Distance (mi) Distance (ft) Elevation (ft) DB 8 W 0.73 3,855.68 26.97 FED USGS Site No: USGS-174513064360800 Site Type: Well Formation Type: Date Drilled: Well Depth: 40 Well Depth Unit: ft Well Hole Depth: Well Hole Depth Unit: Reporting Agency: USGS Puerto Rico Water Science Center Station Name: WEST INDIES 3 WELL, ST. CROIX, USVI Latitude: 17.75164020000000 Longitude: -64.6018058000000 Radon Information 26 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p This section lists any relevant radon information found for the target property. No Radon Zone Level records found for the project property or surrounding properties. Zone 1: Counties with predicted average indoor radon screening levels greater than 4 pCi/L Zone 2: Counties with predicted average indoor radon screening levels from 2 to 4 pCi/L Zone 3: Counties with predicted average indoor radon screening levels less than 2 pCi/L No Indoor Radon Data records found for the project property or surrounding properties. Appendix 27 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p Federal Sources FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer FEMA FLOOD The National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) data incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) databases published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and any Letters Of Map Revision (LOMRs) that have been issued against those databases since their publication date. The FIRM Database is the digital, geospatial version of the flood hazard information shown on the published paper FIRMs. The FIRM Database depicts flood risk information and supporting data used to develop the risk data. The FIRM Database is derived from Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published FIRMs, flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data, where available. Indoor Radon Data INDOOR RADON Indoor radon measurements tracked by the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) and the State Residential Radon Survey. Public Water Systems Violations and Enforcement Data PWSV This list of drinking water violations and enforcement actions is sourced from the U.S Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) system that incorporates Public Water Systems data from EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) database, as part of the national download of Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) data. SDWIS contains information on public water systems from the Public Water System Supervision (PWSS) Program, including monitoring, enforcement, and violation data related to requirements established by the SWDA. Address information provided in SWDIS may correspond either with the physical location of the water system, or with a contact address. Radon Zone Level RADON ZONE Areas showing the level of Radon Zones (level 1, 2 or 3) by county. This data is maintained by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) SDWIS This national download of Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) data is sourced from the U.S Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) system that incorporates Public Water Systems data from EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) database. SDWIS contains information on public water systems from the Public Water System Supervision (PWSS) Program related to requirements established by the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Address information provided in SWDIS may correspond either with the physical location of the water system, or with a contact address. Soil Survey Geographic database SSURGO The Soil Survey Geographic database (SSURGO) contains information about soil as collected by the National Cooperative Soil Survey at the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Soil maps outline areas called map units. The map units are linked to soil properties in a database. Each map unit may contain one to three major components and some minor components. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wetland Data US WETLAND The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wetland layer represents the approximate location and type of wetlands and deepwater habitats in the United States. USGS Current Topo US TOPO US Topo topographic maps are produced by the National Geospatial Program of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The project was launched in late 2009, and the term "US Topo" refers specifically to quadrangle topographic maps published in 2009 and later. USGS Geology US GEOLOGY Seamless maps depicting geological information provided by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). USGS Historical Topo HTMC In 2009, the US Geological Survey (USGS) began the release of a new generation of topographic maps (US Topo) in electronic form, and in 2011, complemented them with the release of high-resolution scans of more than 178,000 historical topographic maps of the United States. Appendix 28 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p USGS National Water Information System FED USGS The U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) National Water Information System (NWIS) is the nation's principal repository of water resources data. The data includes comprehensive information of well-construction details, time-series data for gage height, streamflow, groundwater level, and precipitation and water use data. This NWIS database information is obtained through the Water Quality Data Portal (WQP). The WQP is a cooperative service sponsored by the USGS, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the National Water Quality Monitoring Council (NWQMC). Liability Notice 29 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23110300488p Reliance on information in Report: The Physical Setting Report (PSR) DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as a review of environmental databases and physical characteristics for the site or adjacent properties. License for use of information in Report: No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s) may not be modified or re-sold. Your Liability for misuse: Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties, and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and State government departments. The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS Information Inc. disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright: You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report(s) are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s) (the "Data") is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s) and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS. Project Property: USVI-00230 East End Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter VI 00820 Project No: BST_228 Report Type: Database Report Order No: 24052200607 Requested by: Lotis Environmental Date Completed: May 23, 2024 2 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 h-Table of Contents Notice: IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY Reliance on information in Report: This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records. License for use of information in Report: No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s) may not be modified or re-sold. Your Liability for misuse: Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties, and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and State government departments. The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright: You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report (s) are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s) (the "Data") is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s) and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS. Table of Contents Table of Contents...........................................................................................2 Executive Summary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property...................................................................................7 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties........................................................................8 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source.........................................................................................................9 Map...............................................................................................................10 Aerial.............................................................................................................13 Topographic Map..........................................................................................14 Detail Report.................................................................................................15 Unplottable Summary...................................................................................16 Unplottable Report........................................................................................17 Appendix: Database Descriptions.................................................................19 Definitions.....................................................................................................31 3 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 h-Executive Summary Property Information: Project Property: USVI-00230 East End Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter VI 00820 Project No: BST_228 Coordinates: Latitude: 17.752397 Longitude: -64.590752 UTM Northing: 1,963,506.03 UTM Easting: 331,347.61 UTM Zone: 20Q Elevation: 160 FT Order Information: Order No: 24052200607 Date Requested: May 22, 2024 Requested by: Lotis Environmental Report Type: Database Report Historicals/Products: ERIS Xplorer ERIS Xplorer Excel Add-On Excel Add-On Executive Summary 4 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 h-Executive Summary: Report Summary Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi 0.125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total Standard Environmental Records Federal rr-NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-PROPOSED NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DELETED NPL-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ODI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-IODI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS LIENS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-RCRA CORRACTS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-RCRA TSD-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-RCRA LQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-RCRA SQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-RCRA VSQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-RCRA NON GEN-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-RCRA CONTROLS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FED ENG-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FED INST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-LUCIS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-NPL IC-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-ERNS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FEMA UST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-FRP-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL SEMS ODI SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS IODI CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD RCRA LQG RCRA SQG RCRA VSQG RCRA NON GEN RCRA CONTROLS FED ENG FED INST LUCIS NPL IC ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST FRP Executive Summary: Report Summary 5 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi 0.125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-DELISTED FRP-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-HIST GAS STATIONS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-REFN-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-BULK TERMINAL-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-SEMS LIEN-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-SUPERFUND ROD-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DOE FUSRAP-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 State rr-LUST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-UST VIRGIN ISLANDS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-DELISTED TANKS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-BROWNFIELDS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Tribal No Tribal standard environmental record sources available for this State. County No County standard environmental record sources available for this State. Additional Environmental Records Federal rr-PFAS GHG-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-OSC RESPONSE-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 rr-FINDS/FRS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-TRIS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-PFAS NPL-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS FED SITES-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS SSEHRI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ERNS PFAS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS NPDES-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS TRI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS WATER-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS TSCA-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS E-MANIFEST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS IND-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-HMIRS-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 rr-NCDL-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 rr-TSCA-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 DELISTED FRP HIST GAS STATIONS REFN BULK TERMINAL SEMS LIEN SUPERFUND ROD DOE FUSRAP LUST UST VIRGIN ISLANDS DELISTED TANKS BROWNFIELDS PFAS GHG OSC RESPONSE FINDS/FRS TRIS PFAS NPL PFAS FED SITES PFAS SSEHRI ERNS PFAS PFAS NPDES PFAS TRI PFAS WATER PFAS TSCA PFAS E-MANIFEST PFAS IND HMIRS NCDL TSCA 6 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi 0.125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-HIST TSCA-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 rr-FTTS ADMIN-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-FTTS INSP-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-PRP-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ICIS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-DELISTED FED DRY-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-FUDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-FUDS MRS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-FORMER NIKE-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-PIPELINE INCIDENT-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-MLTS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-HIST MLTS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-MINES-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-SMCRA-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-MRDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-LM SITES-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-ALT FUELS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-CONSENT DECREES-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-AFS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0 rr-SSTS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 rr-PCBT-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PCB-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 State No State additional environmental record sources available for this State. Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County No County additional environmental record sources available for this State. Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 * PO – Property Only * 'Property and adjoining properties' database search radii are set at 0.25 miles. HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS DELISTED FED DRY FUDS FUDS MRS FORMER NIKE PIPELINE INCIDENT MLTS HIST MLTS MINES SMCRA MRDS LM SITES ALT FUELS CONSENT DECREES AFS SSTS PCBT PCB 7 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number No records found in the selected databases for the project property. Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property 8 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number No records found in the selected databases for the surrounding properties. Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties 9 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 h-Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source No records found in the selected databases for the project property or surrounding properties. Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source ^_ 64°34'30"W 64°35'W 64°35'30"W 64°36'W 17°46'N 17°46'N 17°45'30"N 17°45'30"N 17°45'N 17°45'N 17°44'30"N 17°44'30"N 0.3 0 0.3 0.15 Miles Order Number: 24052200607 Map: 1.0 Mile Radius 1:18750 Address: Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, Eastend B Quarter, VI Source: © 2021 ESRI StreetMap Premium © ERIS Information Inc. ^_ Project Property Buffer Outline #* Sites with Higher Elevation ") Sites with Same Elevation #* Sites with Lower Elevation ( Sites with Unknown Elevation Areas with Higher Elevation Areas with Same Elevation Areas with Lower Elevation Areas with Unknown Elevation National Wetland Indian Reserve Land 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone Freeways; Highways Traffic Circle; Ramp Major & Minor Arterial Traffic Circle; Ramp Local Road Rail Country State FWS Special Designation Areas National Priorities List (Active, Delisted, Proposed, Institutional Control) ^_ 64°35'W 64°35'30"W 17°45'30"N 17°45'30"N 17°45'N 17°45'N 0.15 0 0.15 0.075 Miles Order Number: 24052200607 Map: 0.5 Mile Radius 1:9250 Address: Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, Eastend B Quarter, VI Source: © 2021 ESRI StreetMap Premium © ERIS Information Inc. ^_ Project Property Buffer Outline #* Sites with Higher Elevation ") Sites with Same Elevation #* Sites with Lower Elevation ( Sites with Unknown Elevation Areas with Higher Elevation Areas with Same Elevation Areas with Lower Elevation Areas with Unknown Elevation National Wetland Indian Reserve Land 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone Freeways; Highways Traffic Circle; Ramp Major & Minor Arterial Traffic Circle; Ramp Local Road Rail Country State FWS Special Designation Areas National Priorities List (Active, Delisted, Proposed, Institutional Control) ^_ 64°35'30"W 17°45'N 17°45'N 0.075 0 0.075 0.0375 Miles Order Number: 24052200607 Map: 0.25 Mile Radius 1:4750 Address: Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, Eastend B Quarter, VI Source: © 2021 ESRI StreetMap Premium © ERIS Information Inc. ^_ Project Property Buffer Outline #* Sites with Higher Elevation ") Sites with Same Elevation #* Sites with Lower Elevation ( Sites with Unknown Elevation Areas with Higher Elevation Areas with Same Elevation Areas with Lower Elevation Areas with Unknown Elevation National Wetland Indian Reserve Land 100 Year Flood Zone 500 Year Flood Zone Freeways; Highways Traffic Circle; Ramp Major & Minor Arterial Traffic Circle; Ramp Local Road Rail Country State FWS Special Designation Areas National Priorities List (Active, Delisted, Proposed, Institutional Control) ^_ Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community 64°35'W 64°35'30"W 64°36'W 17°45'30"N 17°45'30"N 17°45'N 17°45'N 17°44'30"N 0.1 0 0.1 0.05 Miles Order Number: 24052200607 Aerial 1:10000 Address: Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, Eastend B Quarter, VI © ERIS Information Inc. Source: ESRI World Imagery Year: 2019 ^_ 64°34'30"W 64°35'W 64°35'30"W 64°36'W 64°36'30"W 17°46'30"N 17°46'30"N 17°46'N 17°46'N 17°45'30"N 17°45'30"N 17°45'N 17°45'N 17°44'30"N 17°44'30"N 17°44'N 17°44'N 0.35 0 0.35 0.175 Miles Order Number: 24052200607 Topographic Map 1:24000 Address: Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden, VI © ERIS Information Inc. Source: USGS Topographic Map Quadrangle(s): Grass Point VI, Buck Island VI Year: 2013 15 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 h-Detail Report Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB No records found in the selected databases for the project property or surrounding properties. Detail Report 16 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 h-Unplottable Summary Total: 1 Unplottable sites DB Company Name/Site Name Address City Zip ERIS ID uu-ERNS-895837874-aa RTE. 82 ST. CROIX VI 20820 895837874 NRC Report No: 1322636 ERNS Unplottable Summary 17 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 h-Unplottable Report Site: RTE. 82 ST. CROIX VI 20820 uu-ERNS-895837874-bb NRC Report No: 1322636 Latitude Degrees: Type of Incident: VESSEL Latitude Minutes: Incident Cause: VESSEL SINKING Latitude Seconds: Incident Date: 11/21/2021 13:30 Longitude Degrees: Incident Location: NORTH OF THE EATERNMOST POINT Longitude Minutes: Incident Dtg: DISCOVERED Longitude Seconds: Distance from City: Lat Quad: Distance Units: Long Quad: Direction from City: Location Section: Location County: ST. CROIX Location Township: Potential Flag: Yes Location Range: Year: Year 2021 Reports Description of Incident: ///THIS IS A POTENTIAL RELEASE REPORT/// THE CALLER IS REPORTING A VESSEL THAT RAN AGROUND AT POINT UDALL IN BOILER BAY. Material Spill Information Chris Code: OUN Unit of Measure: UNKNOWN AMOUNT CAS No: 000000-00-0 If Reached Water: YES UN No: Amount in Water: 0 Name of Material: UNKNOWN OIL Unit Reach Water: UNKNOWN AMOUNT Amount of Material: 0 Calls Information Date Time Received: 11/21/2021 3:54:00 PM Responsible City: Date Time Complete: 11/21/2021 4:11:00 PM Responsible State: XX Call Type: INC Responsible Zip: Resp Company: Source: TELEPHONE Resp Org Type: UNKNOWN Incident Information Tank ID: Building ID: Tank Regulated: U Location Area ID: Tank Regulated By: Location Block ID: Capacity of Tank: OCSG No: Capacity Tank Units: OCSP No: Description of Tank: State Lease No: Actual Amount: Pier Dock No: Actual Amount Units: Berth Slip No: Tank Above Ground: ABOVE Brake Failure: U NPDES: Airbag Deployed: U NPDES Compliance: U Transport Contain: U Init Contin Rel No: Location Subdiv: Contin Rel Permit: Platform Rig Name: Contin Release Type: Platform Letter: Aircraft ID: Allision: U Aircraft Runway No: Type of Structure: Aircraft Spot No: Structure Name: Aircraft Type: Structure Oper: U Aircraft Model: Transit Bus Flag: Aircraft Fuel Cap: Date Time Norm Serv: Aircraft Fuel Cap U: Serv Disrupt Time: Aircraft Fuel on Brd: Serv Disrupt Units: ERNS Unplottable Report 18 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 Aircraft Fuel OB U: CR Begin Date: Aircraft Hanger: CR End Date: Road Mile Marker: CR Change Date: Power Gen Facility: U FBI Contact: Generating Capacity: FBI Contact Dt Tm: Type of Fixed Obj: Passenger Handling: Type of Fuel: Passenger Route: XXX DOT Crossing No: Passenger Delay: XXX DOT Regulated: U Sub Part C Test Req: XXX Pipeline Type: Conductor Test: Pipeline Abv Ground: ABOVE Engineer Test: Pipeline Covered: U Trainman Test: Exposed Underwater: N Yard Foreman Test: Railroad Hotline: RCL Operator Test: Railroad Milepost: Brakeman Test: Grade Crossing: U Train Dispat Test: Crossing Device Ty: Signalman Test: Ty Vehicle Involved: Oth Employee Test: Device Operational: U Unknown Test: Incident Details Information Release Secured: U State Agen Report No: Release Rate: State Agen on Scene: Release Rate Unit: State Agen Notified: Release Rate Rate: Fed Agency Notified: USCG Est Duration of Rel: Oth Agency Notified: Desc Remedial Act: NONE Body of Water: BOILER BAY Fire Involved: N Tributary of: ATLANTIC OCEAN Fire Extinguished: U Near River Mile Make: Any Evacuations: N Near River Mile Mark: No Evacuated: Offshore: No Who Evacuated: Weather Conditions: PARTLY CLOUDY Radius of Evac: Air Temperature: Any Injuries: N Wind Direction: No. Injured: Wind Speed: No. Hospitalized: Wind Speed Unit: No. Fatalities: Water Supp Contam: U Any Fatalities: N Water Temperature: Any Damages: N Wave Condition: Damage Amount: Current Speed: Air Corridor Closed: N Current Direction: Air Corridor Desc: Current Speed Unit: Air Closure Time: EMPL Fatality: Waterway Closed: N Pass Fatality: Waterway Desc: Community Impact: Waterway Close Time: Passengers Transfer: NO Road Closed: N Passenger Injuries: Road Desc: Employee Injuries: Road Closure Time: Occupant Fatality: Road Closure Units: Sheen Size: Closure Direction: Sheen Size Units: Major Artery: No Sheen Size Length: Track Closed: N Sheen Size Length U: Track Desc: Sheen Size Width: Track Closure Time: Sheen Size Width U: Track Closure Units: Sheen Color: Track Close Dir: Dir of Sheen Travel: Media Interest: NONE Sheen Odor Desc: Medium Desc: WATER Duration Unit: Addl Medium Info: BOILER BAY Additional Info: ///THIS IS A POTENTIAL RELEASE REPORT/// 19 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 h-Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information: "Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public." Standard Environmental Record Sources Federal National Priority List: rr-NPL-bb Sites on the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s National Priorities List of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. The NPL, which EPA is required to update at least once a year, is based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System. A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action. Sites are represented by boundaries where available in the EPA Superfund Site Boundaries maintained by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). Site boundaries represent the footprint of a whole site, the sum of all of the Operable Units and the current understanding of the full extent of contamination; for Federal Facility sites, the total site polygon may be the Facility boundary. Where there is no polygon boundary data available for a given site, the site is represented as a point. Government Publication Date: Apr 22, 2024 National Priority List - Proposed: rr-PROPOSED NPL-bb Sites proposed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the state agency, or concerned citizens for addition to the National Priorities List (NPL) due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the EPA as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment. Sites are represented by boundaries where available in the EPA Superfund Site Boundaries maintained by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). Site boundaries represent the footprint of a whole site, the sum of all of the Operable Units and the current understanding of the full extent of contamination; for Federal Facility sites, the total site polygon may be the Facility boundary. Where there is no polygon boundary data available for a given site, the site is represented as a point. Government Publication Date: Apr 22, 2024 Deleted NPL: rr-DELETED NPL-bb Sites deleted from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s National Priorities List. The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Sites are represented by boundaries where available in the EPA Superfund Site Boundaries maintained by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). Site boundaries represent the footprint of a whole site, the sum of all of the Operable Units and the current understanding of the full extent of contamination; for Federal Facility sites, the total site polygon may be the Facility boundary. Where there is no polygon boundary data available for a given site, the site is represented as a point. Government Publication Date: Apr 22, 2024 SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory: rr-SEMS-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool. This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites. An active site is one at which site assessment, removal, remedial, enforcement, cost recovery, or oversight activities are being planned or conducted. This data includes SEMS sites from the List 8R Active file as well as applicable sites from the EPA's Facility Registry Service map tool. Government Publication Date: Mar 27, 2024 NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL SEMS Appendix: Database Descriptions 20 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 Inventory of Open Dumps, June 1985: rr-ODI-bb The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines "open dumps" as facilities which do not comply with EPA's "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR 257). Government Publication Date: Jun 1985 SEMS List 8R Archive Sites: rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS. An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. This data includes sites from the List 8R Archived site file. Government Publication Date: Mar 27, 2024 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System - CERCLIS: rr-CERCLIS-bb Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments; this database is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands: rr-IODI-bb Public Law 103-399, The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994, enacted October 22, 1994, identified congressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas. The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands, assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites, and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1998 CERCLIS - No Further Remedial Action Planned: rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-bb An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 CERCLIS Liens: rr-CERCLIS LIENS-bb A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination ("Superfund site") and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA ("Superfund") lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This database was provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Refer to SEMS LIEN as the current data source for Superfund Liens. Government Publication Date: Jan 30, 2014 RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action: rr-RCRA CORRACTS-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. At these sites, the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur. EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination, geology, and anticipated use unique to each site. Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 2024 RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities: rr-RCRA TSD-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. This database includes Non- Corrective Action sites that have indicated engagement in the treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste which requires a RCRA hazardous waste permit. Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 2024 ODI SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS IODI CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD 21 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 RCRA Generator List: rr-RCRA LQG-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 2024 RCRA Small Quantity Generators List: rr-RCRA SQG-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month. Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 2024 RCRA Very Small Quantity Generators List: rr-RCRA VSQG-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Very Small Quantity Generators (VSQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste, or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Additionally, VSQG may not accumulate more than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste at any time. Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 2024 RCRA Non-Generators: rr-RCRA NON GEN-bb RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 2024 RCRA Sites with Controls: rr-RCRA CONTROLS-bb List of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities with institutional controls in place. RCRA gives the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to control hazardous waste from the "cradle-to-grave." This includes the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA also set forth a framework for the management of non-hazardous solid wastes. The 1986 amendments to RCRA enabled EPA to address environmental problems that could result from underground tanks storing petroleum and other hazardous substances. Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 2024 Federal Engineering Controls-ECs: rr-FED ENG-bb List of Engineering controls (ECs) made availabe by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ECs encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers (e.g., soil capping, sub-surface venting systems, mitigation barriers, fences) to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. The EC listing includes remedy component data from Superfund decision documents for applicable sites on the final or deleted on the National Priorities List (NPL); and sites with a Superfund Alternative Approach (SAA) Agreement in place. The only sites included that are not on the NPL; proposed for NPL; or removed from proposed NPL, are those with an SAA Agreement in place. Government Publication Date: Feb 29, 2024 Federal Institutional Controls- ICs: rr-FED INST-bb List of Institutional controls (ICs) made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ICs are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Although it is EPA's expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. The IC listing includes remedy component data from Superfund decision documents for applicable sites on the final or deleted on the National Priorities List (NPL); and sites with a Superfund Alternative Approach (SAA) Agreement in place. The only sites included that are not on the NPL; proposed for NPL; or removed from proposed NPL, are those with an SAA Agreement in place. Government Publication Date: Feb 29, 2024 RCRA LQG RCRA SQG RCRA VSQG RCRA NON GEN RCRA CONTROLS FED ENG FED INST 22 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 Land Use Control Information System: rr-LUCIS-bb The LUCIS database is maintained by the U.S. Department of the Navy and contains information for former Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) properties across the United States. Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2006 Institutional Control Boundaries at NPL sites: rr-NPL IC-bb Boundaries of Institutional Control areas at sites on the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s National Priorities List, or Proposed or Deleted, made available by the EPA's Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s National Priorities List of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. Institutional controls are non-engineered instruments such as administrative and legal controls that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Government Publication Date: Apr 22, 2024 Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1982-1986 Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1987-1989 Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports made available by the United States Coast Guard National Response Center (NRC). The NRC fields initial reports for pollution and railroad incidents and forwards that information to appropriate federal/state agencies for response. These data contain initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency. Government Publication Date: Feb 20, 2024 The Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) Brownfield Database: rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-bb Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This data is provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and includes Brownfield sites from the Cleanups in My Community (CIMC) web application. Government Publication Date: Feb 7, 2024 FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing: rr-FEMA UST-bb The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017 Facility Response Plan: rr-FRP-bb This listing contains facilities that have submitted Facility Response Plans (FRPs) to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause "substantial harm" to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters are required to prepare and submit FRPs. Harm is determined based on total oil storage capacity, secondary containment and age of tanks, oil transfer activities, history of discharges, proximity to a public drinking water intake or sensitive environments. This listing includes FRP facilities from an applicable EPA FOIA file and Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD) data file. Government Publication Date: May 2, 2023 Delisted Facility Response Plans: rr-DELISTED FRP-bb Facilities that once appeared in - and have since been removed from - the list of facilities that have submitted Facility Response Plans (FRP) to EPA. Facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause "substantial harm" to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters are required to prepare and submit Facility Response Plans (FRPs). Harm is determined based on total oil storage capacity, secondary containment and age of tanks, oil transfer activities, history of discharges, proximity to a public drinking water intake or sensitive environments. Government Publication Date: May 2, 2023 LUCIS NPL IC ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST FRP DELISTED FRP 23 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 Historical Gas Stations: rr-HIST GAS STATIONS-bb This historic directory of service stations is provided by the Cities Service Company. The directory includes Cities Service filling stations that were located throughout the United States in 1930. Government Publication Date: Jul 1, 1930 Petroleum Refineries: rr-REFN-bb List of petroleum refineries from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Refinery Capacity Report. Includes operating and idle petroleum refineries (including new refineries under construction) and refineries shut down during the previous year located in the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and other U.S. possessions. Survey locations adjusted using public data. Government Publication Date: Feb 28, 2024 Petroleum Product and Crude Oil Rail Terminals: rr-BULK TERMINAL-bb A list of petroleum product and crude oil rail terminals from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), as well as petroleum terminals sourced from the Federal Communications Commission Data hosted by the Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Database. Data includes operable bulk petroleum product terminals with a total bulk shell storage capacity of 50,000 barrels or more, and/or the ability to receive volumes from tanker, barge, or pipeline; also rail terminals handling the loading and unloading of crude oil with activity between 2017 and 2018. EIA petroleum product terminal data comes from the EIA-815 Bulk Terminal and Blender Report, which includes working, shell in operation, and shell idle for several major product groupings. Government Publication Date: Sep 22, 2023 LIEN on Property: rr-SEMS LIEN-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) provides Lien details on applicable properties, such as the Superfund lien on property activity, the lien property information, and the parties associated with the lien. Government Publication Date: Mar 27, 2024 Superfund Decision Documents: rr-SUPERFUND ROD-bb This database contains a list of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of (or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan. The decision documents include completed Records of Decision (ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences (ESD) for active and archived sites stored in the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), along with other associated memos and files. This information is maintained and made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Government Publication Date: Mar 27, 2024 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program: rr-DOE FUSRAP-bb The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from the Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. The DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM) established long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M) requirements for remediated FUSRAP sites. DOE evaluates the final site conditions of a remediated site on the basis of risk for different future uses. DOE then confirms that LTS&M requirements will maintain protectiveness. Government Publication Date: Mar 4, 2017 State Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) in Virgin Islands: rr-LUST-bb A list of leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) in Virgin Islands that is maintained by the Department of Planning and Natural Resources. The Underground Storage Tank Program aims to protect groundwater resources by regulating underground storage tank systems pursuant to the Virgin Islands Underground Storage Tank Act (USTA) which was enacted in May 2000. Government Publication Date: Aug 17, 2017 Underground Storage Tanks in Virgin Islands: rr-UST VIRGIN ISLANDS-bb A list of underground storage tanks (UST) in Virgin Islands that is maintained by the Department of Planning and Natural Resources. The Underground Storage Tank Program aims to protect groundwater resources by regulating underground storage tank systems pursuant to the Virgin Islands Underground Storage Tank Act (USTA) which was enacted in May 2000. Government Publication Date: Jan 8, 2021 Delisted Tanks: rr-DELISTED TANKS-bb Tank facilities that once appeared on - and have since been removed from - the list of underground storage tanks (UST) made available by the Department of Planning and Natural Resources in Virgin Islands. The Underground Storage Tank Program aims to protect groundwater resources by regulating underground storage tank systems pursuant to the Virgin Islands Underground Storage Tank Act (USTA) which was enacted in May 2000. HIST GAS STATIONS REFN BULK TERMINAL SEMS LIEN SUPERFUND ROD DOE FUSRAP LUST UST VIRGIN ISLANDS DELISTED TANKS 24 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 Government Publication Date: Jan 8, 2021 Brownfields: rr-BROWNFIELDS-bb A list of brownfield sites made available by the Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR). Government Publication Date: Jun 28, 2019 Tribal No Tribal standard environmental record sources available for this State. County No County standard environmental record sources available for this State. Additional Environmental Record Sources Federal PFAS Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data: rr-PFAS GHG-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) collects Greenhouse Gas (GHG) data from large emitting facilities (25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year), and suppliers of fossil fuels and industrial gases that results in GHG emissions when used. Includes GHG emissions data for facilities that emit or have emitted since 2010 chemicals identified in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard list of PFAS without explicit structures and list of PFAS structures by DSSTox. PFAS emissions data has been identified for facilities engaged in the following industrial processes: Aluminum Production (GHGRP Subpart F), HCFC-22 Production and HFC-23 Destruction (Subpart O), Electronics Manufacturing (Subpart I), Fluorinated Gas Production (Subpart L), Magnesium Production (Subpart T), Electrical Transmission and Distribution Equipment Use (Subpart DD), and Manufacture of Electric Transmission and Distribution Equipment (Subpart SS). Over time, other industrial processes with required GHGRP reporting may include PFAS emissions data and the list of reportable gases may change over time. Government Publication Date: May 9, 2024 On-Scene Coordinator Response Sites: rr-OSC RESPONSE-bb This list of On-Scene Coordinator (OSC) Response Sites is provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). OSCs are the federal officials responsible for monitoring or directing responses to all oil spills and hazardous substance releases reported to the federal government. OSCs coordinate all federal efforts with, and provide support and information to local, state, and regional response communities. An OSC is an agent of either EPA or the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), depending on where the incident occurs. EPA's OSCs have primary responsibility for spills and releases to inland areas and waters. USCG OSCs have responsibility for coastal waters and the Great Lakes. In general, an OSC has the following key responsibilities during and after a response: Assessment, Monitoring, Response Assistance, and Evaluation. Government Publication Date: Apr 4, 2024 Facility Registry Service/Facility Index: rr-FINDS/FRS-bb The Facility Registry Service (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites, or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, and data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. This list is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Feb 9, 2024 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program: rr-TRIS-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of toxic chemicals from U.S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. There are currently 770 individually listed chemicals and 33 chemical categories covered by the TRI Program. Facilities that manufacture, process or otherwise use these chemicals in amounts above established levels must submit annual reporting forms for each chemical. Note that the TRI chemical list does not include all toxic chemicals used in the U.S. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment. This database includes TRI Reporting Data for calendar years 1987 through 2021 and Preliminary Data for 2022. Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2023 PFOA/PFOS Contaminated Sites: rr-PFAS NPL-bb BROWNFIELDS PFAS GHG OSC RESPONSE FINDS/FRS TRIS PFAS NPL 25 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 This list of Superfund Sites with Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) detections is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in their PFAS Analytic Tools data, previously the list was obtained by EPA FOIA requests. EPA's Office of Land and Emergency Management and EPA Regional Offices maintain what is known about site investigations, contamination, and remedial actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) where PFAS is present in the environment. Limitations: Detections of PFAS at National Priorities List (NPL) sites do not mean that people are at risk from PFAS, are exposed to PFAS, or that the site is the source of the PFAS. The information in the Superfund NPL and Superfund Alternative Agreement (SAA) PFAS detection site list is years old and may not be accurate today. Site information such as site name, site ID, and location has been confirmed for accuracy; however, PFAS-related information such as media sampled, drinking water being above the health advisory, or mitigation efforts has not been verified. For Federal Facilities data, the other Federal agencies (OFA) are the lead agency for their data and provided them to EPA. Government Publication Date: Mar 19, 2024 Federal Agency Locations with Known or Suspected PFAS Detections: rr-PFAS FED SITES-bb List of Federal agency locations with known or suspected detections of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in their PFAS Analytic Tools data. EPA outlines that these data are gathered from several federal entities, such as the Federal Superfund program, Department of Defense (DOD), National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Transportation, and Department of Energy. The dates this data was extracted for the PFAS Analytic Tools range from March 2022 to September 2023. Sites on this list do not necessarily reflect the source/s of PFAS contamination and detections do not indicate level of risk or human exposure at the site. Agricultural notifications in this data are limited to DOD sites only. At this time, the EPA is aware that this list is not comprehensive of all Federal agencies. Government Publication Date: Sep 5, 2023 SSEHRI PFAS Contamination Sites: rr-PFAS SSEHRI-bb This PFAS Contamination Site Tracker database is compiled by the Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute (SSEHRI) at Northeastern University. According to the SSEHRI, the database records qualitative and quantitative data from each known site of PFAS contamination, including timeline of discovery, sources, levels, health impacts, community response, and government response. The goal of this database is to compile information and support public understanding of the rapidly unfolding issue of PFAS contamination. All data presented was extracted from government websites, news articles, or publicly available documents, and this is cited in the tracker. Locations for the Known PFAS Contamination Sites are sourced from the PFAS Sites and Community Resources Map, credited to the Northeastern University's PFAS Project Lab, Silent Spring Institute, and the PFAS- REACH team. Disclaimer: The source conveys the data undergoes regular updates as new information becomes available, some sites may be missing and/or contain information that is incorrect or outdated, as well as their information represents all contamination sites SSEHRI is aware of, not all possible contamination sites. This data is not intended to be used for legal purposes. Access the following source link for the most current information: https://pfasproject.com/pfas-sites-and-community-resources/ Government Publication Date: May 19, 2023 National Response Center PFAS Spills: rr-ERNS PFAS-bb This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Spills dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. The National Response Center (NRC), operated by the U.S. Coast Guard, is the designated federal point of contact for reporting all oil, chemical, and other discharges into the environment, for the United States and its territories. This dataset contains NRC spill information from 1990 to the present that is restricted to records associated with PFAS and PFAS-containing materials. Incidents are filtered to include only records with a "Material Involved" or "Incident Description" related to Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF). The keywords used to filter the data included "AFFF," "Fire Fighting Foam," "Aqueous Film Forming Foam," "Fire Suppressant Foam, "PFAS," "PERFL," "PFOA," "PFOS," and "Genx." Limitations: The data from the NRC website contains initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency. Keyword searches may misidentify some incident reports that do not contain PFAS. This dataset should also not be considered to be exhaustive of all PFAS spills/release incidents. Government Publication Date: Apr 17, 2024 PFAS NPDES Discharge Monitoring: rr-PFAS NPDES-bb This list of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitted facilities with required monitoring for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) Substances is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s PFAS Analytic Tools. Any point-source wastewater discharger to waters of the United States must have a NPDES permit, which defines a set of parameters for pollutants and monitoring to ensure that the discharge does not degrade water quality or impair human health. This list includes NPDES permitted facilities associated with permits that monitor for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), limited to the years 2007 - present. EPA further advises the following regarding these data: currently, fewer than half of states have required PFAS monitoring for at least one of their permittees, and fewer states have established PFAS effluent limits for permittees. For states that may have required monitoring, some reporting and data transfer issues may exist on a state-by-state basis. Government Publication Date: May 6, 2024 Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) from Toxic Release Inventory: rr-PFAS TRI-bb List of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities at which the reported chemical is a per- or polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) substance included in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) consolidated PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances. Encompasses Toxics Release Inventory records included in the EPA PFAS Analytic Tools. The EPA's TRI database currently tracks information on disposal or releases of 770 individually listed toxic chemicals and 33 chemical categories from thousands of U.S. facilities and details about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. This listing includes TRI Reporting Data for calendar years 1987 through 2021 and Preliminary Data for 2022. PFAS FED SITES PFAS SSEHRI ERNS PFAS PFAS NPDES PFAS TRI 26 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2023 Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) Water Quality: rr-PFAS WATER-bb The Water Quality Portal (WQP) is a cooperative service sponsored by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the National Water Quality Monitoring Council (NWQMC). This listing includes records from the Water Quality Portal where the characteristic (environmental measurement) is in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s consolidated Master List of PFAS Substances. Government Publication Date: Jul 20, 2020 PFAS TSCA Manufacture and Import Facilities: rr-PFAS TSCA-bb The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and requires chemical manufacturers and facilities that manufacture or import chemical substances to report data to EPA. This list is specific only to TSCA Manufacture and Import Facilities with reported per- and poly-fluoroalkyl (PFAS) substances. Data file is sourced from EPA's PFAS Analytic Tools TSCA dataset which includes CDR/Inventory Update Reporting data from 1998 up to 2020. Disclaimer: This data file includes production and importation data for chemicals identified in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard list of PFAS without explicit structures and list of PFAS structures in DSSTox. Note that some regulations have specific chemical structure requirements that define PFAS differently than the lists in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard. Reporting information on manufactured or imported chemical substance amounts should not be compared between facilities, as some companies claim Chemical Data Reporting Rule data fields for PFAS information as Confidential Business Information. Government Publication Date: Jan 5, 2023 PFAS Waste Transfers from RCRA e-Manifest : rr-PFAS E-MANIFEST-bb This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Waste Transfers dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. Every shipment of hazardous waste in the U.S. must be accompanied by a shipment manifest, which is a critical component of the cradle-to-grave tracking of wastes mandated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). According to the EPA, currently no Federal Waste Code exists for any PFAS compounds. To work around the lack of PFAS waste codes in the RCRA database, EPA developed the PFAS Transfers dataset by mining e-Manifest records containing at least one of these common PFAS keywords: • PFAS • PFOA • PFOS • PERFL • AFFF • GENX • GEN-X (plus the Vermont state-specific waste codes). Limitations: Amount or concentration of PFAS being transferred cannot be determined from the manifest information. Keyword searches may misidentify some manifest records that do not contain PFAS. This dataset should also not be considered to be exhaustive of all PFAS waste transfers. Government Publication Date: Apr 29, 2024 PFAS Industry Sectors: rr-PFAS IND-bb This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Industry Sectors dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. The EPA developed the dataset from various sources that show which industries may be handling PFAS including: EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) records restricted to potential PFAS-handling industry sectors; ECHO records for Fire Training Sites identified where fire-fighting foam may have been used in training exercises; and 14 CFR Part 139 Airports compiled from historic and current records from the FAA Airport Data and Information Portal. Since July 2006, all certificated Part 139 Airports are required to have fire-fighting foam onsite that meet certain military specifications, which to date have been fluorinated (Aqueous Film Forming Foam). Limitations: Inclusion in this dataset does not indicate that PFAS are being manufactured, processed, used, or released by the facility. Listed facilities potentially handle PFAS based on their industrial profile, but are unconfirmed by the EPA. Keyword searches in ECHO for Fire Training sites may misidentify some facilities and should not be considered to be an exhaustive list of fire training facilities in the U.S. Government Publication Date: Apr 15, 2024 Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System: rr-HMIRS-bb The Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting System (HMIRS) database contains unintentional hazardous materials release information reported to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Government Publication Date: Nov 26, 2023 National Clandestine Drug Labs: rr-NCDL-bb The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department"), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Government Publication Date: Nov 30, 2023 Toxic Substances Control Act: rr-TSCA-bb PFAS WATER PFAS TSCA PFAS E-MANIFEST PFAS IND HMIRS NCDL TSCA 27 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing, processing, and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances) on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes, manufacturing sites, and how the chemical substances are used. This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information (CBI). EPA CDR collections occur approximately every four years and reporting requirements change per collection. Government Publication Date: May 12, 2022 Hist TSCA: rr-HIST TSCA-bb The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles, the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals. The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2006 FTTS Administrative Case Listing: rr-FTTS ADMIN-bb An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 FTTS Inspection Case Listing: rr-FTTS INSP-bb An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 Potentially Responsible Parties List: rr-PRP-bb Early in the site cleanup process, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a search to find the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs). The EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site. This listing contains PRPs, Noticed Parties, at sites in the EPA's Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS). Government Publication Date: Apr 22, 2024 State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing: rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-bb The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Since 2017, the SCRD no longer maintains this data, refer to applicable state source data where available. Government Publication Date: Nov 08, 2017 Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS): rr-ICIS-bb The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) database contains integrated enforcement and compliance information across most of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) programs. The vision for ICIS is to replace EPA's independent databases that contain enforcement data with a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions and a subset of the Permit Compliance System (PCS), which supports the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). This information is maintained by the EPA Headquarters and at the Regional offices. A future release of ICIS will completely replace PCS and will integrate that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also has the capability to track other activities that support compliance and enforcement programs, including incident tracking, compliance assistance, and compliance monitoring. Government Publication Date: Aug 26, 2023 Drycleaner Facilities: rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-bb A list of drycleaner facilities from Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) data as made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), sourced from the ECHO Exporter file. The EPA tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments. Government Publication Date: Jan 20, 2024 HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS 28 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 Delisted Drycleaner Facilities: rr-DELISTED FED DRY-bb List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities (sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment). Government Publication Date: Jan 20, 2024 Formerly Used Defense Sites: rr-FUDS-bb Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to, or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986, where the Department of Defense (DOD) is responsible for an environmental restoration. The FUDS Annual Report to Congress (ARC) is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This data is compiled from the USACE's Geospatial FUDS data layers and Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD) FUDS dataset which applies to the Fiscal Year 2021 FUDS Inventory. Government Publication Date: May 15, 2023 FUDS Munitions Response Sites: rr-FUDS MRS-bb Boundaries of Munitions Response Sites (MRS), published with the Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Annual Report to Congress (ARC) by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). An MRS is a discrete location within a Munitions response area (MRA) that is known to require a munitions response. An MRA means any area on a defense site that is known or suspected to contain unexploded ordnance (UXO), discarded military munitions (DMM), or munitions constituents (MC). This data is compiled from the USACE's Geospatial MRS data layers and Homeland Infrastructure Foundation- Level Data (HIFLD) MRS dataset. Government Publication Date: May 15, 2023 Former Military Nike Missile Sites: rr-FORMER NIKE-bb This information was taken from report DRXTH-AS-IA-83A016 (Historical Overview of the Nike Missile System, 12/1984) which was performed by Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. for the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency Assessment Division. The Nike system was deployed between 1954 and the mid-1970's. Among the substances used or stored on Nike sites were liquid missile fuel (JP-4); starter fluids (UDKH, aniline, and furfuryl alcohol); oxidizer (IRFNA); hydrocarbons (motor oil, hydraulic fluid, diesel fuel, gasoline, heating oil); solvents (carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, trichloroethane, stoddard solvent); and battery electrolyte. The quantities of material a disposed of and procedures for disposal are not documented in published reports. Virtually all information concerning the potential for contamination at Nike sites is confined to personnel who were assigned to Nike sites. During deactivation most hardware was shipped to depot-level supply points. There were reportedly instances where excess materials were disposed of on or near the site itself at closure. There was reportedly no routine site decontamination. Government Publication Date: Dec 2, 1984 PHMSA Pipeline Safety Flagged Incidents: rr-PIPELINE INCIDENT-bb This list of flagged pipeline incidents is made available by the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). PHMSA regulations require incident and accident reports for five different pipeline system types. Accidents reported on hazardous liquid gravity lines (§195.13) and reporting-regulated-only hazardous liquid gathering lines (§195.15) and incidents reported on Type R gas gathering (§192.8(c)) are not included in the flagged incident file data. Government Publication Date: Nov 6, 2023 Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS): rr-MLTS-bb A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing requirements. This list is maintained by the NRC. As of September 2016, the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016. Government Publication Date: May 11, 2021 Historic Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) sites: rr-HIST MLTS-bb A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS). In some cases, a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an "Agreement State". An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2010 Mines Master Index File: rr-MINES-bb The Master Index File (MIF) is provided by the United States Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). This file, which was originally created in the 1970's, contained many Mine-IDs that were invalid. MSHA removes invalid IDs from the MIF upon discovery. MSHA applicable data includes the following: all Coal and Metal/Non-Metal mines under MSHA's jurisdiction since 1/1/1970; mine addresses for all mines in the database except for Abandoned mines prior to 1998 from MSHA's legacy system (addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself); violations that have been assessed penalties as a result of MSHA inspections beginning on 1/1/2000; and violations issued as a result of MSHA inspections conducted beginning on 1/1/2000. Government Publication Date: Feb 5, 2024 DELISTED FED DRY FUDS FUDS MRS FORMER NIKE PIPELINE INCIDENT MLTS HIST MLTS MINES 29 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act Sites: rr-SMCRA-bb An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). This inventory contains information on the type and extent of Abandoned Mine Land (AML) impacts, as well as information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The data is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Disclaimer: Per the OSMRE, States and tribes who enter their data into eAMLIS (AML Inventory System) may truncate their latitude and longitude so the precise location of usually dangerous AMLs is not revealed in an effort to protect the public from searching for these AMLs, most of which are on private property. If more precise location information is needed, please contact the applicable state/tribe of interest. Government Publication Date: Jun 13, 2023 Mineral Resource Data System: rr-MRDS-bb The Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) is a collection of reports describing metallic and nonmetallic mineral resources throughout the world. Included are deposit name, location, commodity, deposit description, geologic characteristics, production, reserves, resources, and references. This database contains the records previously provided in the Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) of USGS and the Mineral Availability System/Mineral Industry Locator System (MAS/MILS) originated in the U.S. Bureau of Mines, which is now part of USGS. The USGS has ceased systematic updates of the MRDS database with their focus more recently on deposits of critical minerals while providing a well-documented baseline of historical mine locations from USGS topographic maps. Government Publication Date: Mar 15, 2016 DOE Legacy Management Sites: rr-LM SITES-bb The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) currently manages radioactive and chemical waste, environmental contamination, and hazardous material at over 100 sites across the U.S. The LM manages sites with diverse regulatory drivers (statutes or programs that direct cleanup and management requirements at DOE sites) or as part of internal DOE or congressionally-recognized programs, such as but not limited to: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP), Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA Title I, Tile II), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D), Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA). This site listing includes data exported from the DOE Office of LM' s Geospatial Environmental Mapping System (GEMS). GEMS Data disclaimer: The DOE Office of LM makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, regarding the use, accuracy, availability, or completeness of the data presented herein. Government Publication Date: Dec 12, 2023 Alternative Fueling Stations: rr-ALT FUELS-bb This list of alternative fueling stations is sourced from the Alternative Fuels Data Center (AFDC). The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy launched the AFDC in 1991 as a repository for alternative fuel vehicle performance data, which provides a wealth of information and data on alternative and renewable fuels, advanced vehicles, fuel-saving strategies, and emerging transportation technologies. The data includes Biodiesel (B20 and above), Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Electric, Ethanol (E85), Hydrogen, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Propane (LPG), and Renewable Diesel (R20 and above) fuel type locations. Government Publication Date: Apr 30, 2024 Superfunds Consent Decrees: rr-CONSENT DECREES-bb This list of Superfund consent decrees is provided by the Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division (ENRD) through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) applicable file. This listing includes Cases filed since 2010 limited to the following: Consent Decrees for CERCLA or Superfund Sites filed and/or as proposed within the ENRD's Case Management System (CMS); and applicable ENRD's Environmental Defense Section (EDS) CERCLA Cases with "Consent" in History Note. CMS may not reflect the latest developments in a case, nor can the agency guarantee the accuracy of the data. ENRD Disclaimer: Congress excluded three discrete categories of law enforcement and national security records from the requirements of the FOIA; response is limited to those records that are subject to the requirements of the FOIA; however, this should not be taken as an indication that excluded records do, or do not, exist. Government Publication Date: Sep 15, 2023 Air Facility System: rr-AFS-bb This EPA retired Air Facility System (AFS) dataset contains emissions, compliance, and enforcement data on stationary sources of air pollution. Regulated sources cover a wide spectrum; from large industrial facilities to relatively small operations such as dry cleaners. AFS does not contain data on facilities that are solely asbestos demolition and/or renovation contractors, or landfills. ECHO Clean Air Act data from AFS are frozen and reflect data as of October 17, 2014; the EPA retired this system for Clean Air Act stationary sources and transitioned to ICIS-Air. Government Publication Date: Oct 17, 2014 Registered Pesticide Establishments: rr-SSTS-bb SMCRA MRDS LM SITES ALT FUELS CONSENT DECREES AFS SSTS 30 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 This national list of active EPA-registered foreign and domestic pesticide and/or device-producing establishments is based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS). The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 7 requires that each producing establishment must place its EPA establishment number on the label or immediate container of each pesticide, active ingredient or device produced. An EPA establishment number on a pesticide product label identifies the EPA registered location where the product was produced. The list of establishments is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Feb 29, 2024 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Transformers: rr-PCBT-bb Locations of Transformers Containing Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) registered with the United States Environmental Protection Agency. PCB transformer owners must register their transformer(s) with EPA. Although not required, PCB transformer owners who have removed and properly disposed of a registered PCB transformer may notify EPA to have their PCB transformer de-registered. Data made available by EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2019 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Notifiers: rr-PCB-bb Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) activities. Any company or person storing, transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number. Government Publication Date: Oct 30, 2023 State No State additional environmental record sources available for this State. Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County No County additional environmental record sources available for this State. PCBT PCB 31 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24052200607 h-Definitions Database Descriptions: This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including: source, information available, time coverage, and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order. Detail Report: This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are summarized by location, starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity. Distance: The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites' boundaries. All values are an approximation. Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report. Elevation: The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted. All values are an approximation. Source: Google Elevation API. Executive Summary: This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections: 'Report Summary'- Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and, within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. 'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'- This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. Map Key: The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers always start at #1. The project property will always have a map key of '1' if records are available. If there is a number in brackets beside the main number, this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number in brackets, there is only one record for that property. The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation': the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation' and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables: These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. These records may or may not be in your study area, and are included as reference. Definitions Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 Appendix D Historical Information Project Property: Project No: Requested By: Order No: Date Completed: USVI-00230IEast End Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter VI 00820 BST_228 Lotis Environmental 23110300488 May 28, 2024 Please note that no information was found for your site or adjacent properties. Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 Appendix E Previous Study A previous Phase I ESA was not provided to Lotis for review. Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 Appendix F Client Provided Documents None Provided Phase I ESA – Project No. BST_228 Blue Sky Towers III, LLC East End USVI-00230 Appendix G Personnel Qualifications (716)580-7000 www.thelotisgroup.com Lotis Environmental, LLC 8899 Main Street, Suite 107 Williamsville, NY 14221 DAVID N. ROBINSON, P.E. President/CEO, The Lotis Engineering Group, P.C. President/CEO, Lotis Environmental, LLC Professional Experience The Lotis Engineering Group, P.C. – President/CEO (May 2007 – Present) Lotis Environmental, LLC – President/CEO (June 2019 – Present) 8899 Main Street- Suite 107 Williamsville, New York 14221 Parsons Brinckerhoff – Project Manager (January 2000 – May 2007) 50 Lakefront Blvd # 111 Buffalo, New York 14202 URS Corporation – Project Engineer (July 1996 – July 2000) 257 West Genesee Street, Suite 400 Buffalo, New York 14202 Education M.S., Environmental Engineering, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1995 B.S., Civil Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1994 A.A.S., Architectural Engineering, Alfred State College, 1990 Professional Affiliations New York State Wireless Association Professional Registrations Professional Engineer, New York 2001 (079047) Certifications FEMA Public Assistance Program Operations I OSHA 40 Hr. Hazardous Waste Site Worker Training Nokia CMPro Cost Control Training Key Qualifications David Robinson founded The Lotis Group and has served as CEO since its inception in 2007. Mr. Robinson is a New York State Professional Engineer and an ASTM-defined Environmental Professional. Over his 20 year professional career, Mr. Robinson has performed over 18,000 Phase I Environmental Site Assessments in all 50 states and Canada. As CEO of Lotis, Mr. Robinson directs the strategic direction of the company and has grown Lotis into a leader in the environmental due diligence industry. (716)580-7000 www.thelotisgroup.com Lotis Environmental, LLC 8899 Main Street, Suite 107 Williamsville, NY 14221 Telecommunications Experience • Vertical Bridge Holdings, LLC, Nationwide, US (2014-ongoing): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on sites in all 50 states, the Caribbean and Canada. • Blue Sky Towers, LLC, Nationwide, US (2014-ongoing): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on sites in the Northeast. • InSite Towers, LLC, Nationwide, US (2014-ongoing): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on sites throughout the US and Caribbean. • Mercury Towers, LLC, Nationwide, US (2014-2015): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on sites in the Northwest. • IWG-TLA Telecom, LLC, Nationwide, US (2014-ongoing): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on sites throughout the US and Canada. • Turris Sites, Canada (2014-ongoing): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout Canada. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on sites throughout Canada. • Phoenix Towers International, Nationwide, US (2014-ongoing): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on sites throughout the US and Caribbean. • SBA, Inc. Acquisition Services, Nationwide, US (2001-2011): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include property surveys, 2C surveys, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, NEPA compliance studies, zoning issues, and structural evaluation of existing towers. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on over 7,000 sites in all 50 states, the Caribbean and Canada. • Global Tower Partners, Inc., Nationwide, US (2004-2013): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include property surveys, 2C surveys, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, NEPA compliance studies, zoning issues, and structural evaluation of existing towers. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on over 5,000 sites in all 50 states and the Caribbean. (716)580-7000 www.thelotisgroup.com Lotis Environmental, LLC 8899 Main Street, Suite 107 Williamsville, NY 14221 • Tower Ventures, LLC, Nationwide, US (2011-ongoing): Project Manager/Engineer for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services telecommunication sites throughout the US. • AT&T NexGen, Nationwide, US (2004): Project Engineer for this 16,000-mile long-haul fiber-optic confidential construction project throughout the United States. David was responsible for preparing tax recording documents needed to file taxes for AT&T’s fiber build. • Nassau County Police Department Land Mobile Radio System Modernization Project (2005-2007): Project Manager for engineering services relating to the upgrade of Nassau County’s public safety communication system. Services include site design, construction drawing preparation, property surveys, 1A surveys, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, NEPA compliance studies, zoning issues, and structural evaluation of existing towers. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on 36 sites throughout the county. • The City of New York Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications Channel 16 Project (2005-2007): Project Manager for engineering services relating to the design and construction of a conventional/trunked radio system for FDNY and other New York City agencies. Services include site design, construction drawing preparation, property surveys, 1A surveys, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, NEPA compliance studies, zoning issues, and structural evaluation of existing towers. David has been responsible for managing resources to complete these services on 7 sites in New York City. • NorthStar Communications, Inc., Florida (2003-2004: Project Manager for services relating to the development of telecommunications tower sites throughout Florida for Nextel. Services included construction drawings, property surveys, 2C surveys, zoning issues, and structural evaluation of existing towers. David was responsible for managing resources to complete these services on over 20 sites in the state of Florida. Other Experience • BNMC Utilities Relocation, Buffalo, New York (2002): Civil Engineer for the design of utility relocations at Roswell Park in Buffalo. David was responsible for developing construction documents and specifications, as well as providing consulting services throughout the design process. His duties also included preparation of construction cost estimates and submittal review. • NFTA Metro Bus – Bus Fueling Station Systems Modifications for Dual Fuel, Buffalo, New York (2002): Civil Engineer for the design and preparation of design drawings, specifications and cost estimate for the replacement of an existing single fuel system to that of a dual fuel system. • New Jersey DPMC Underground Storage Tank Program, New Jersey (1999-2001): Civil Engineer for the design of new aboveground and underground tank fueling systems (including fuel dispensers, leak detection systems, inventory control systems, and concrete tank slabs) for various State Departments in New Jersey. David was responsible for developing design drawings, construction documents and specifications, as well as providing consulting services throughout the construction process. His duties also included creating and maintaining resource-loaded project schedules for project using Primavera project scheduling software. (716)580-7000 www.thelotisgroup.com Lotis Environmental, LLC 8899 Main Street, Suite 107 Williamsville, NY 14221 • Former Hyatt Clark Industries, Inc. Site, New Jersey (1996-1998): Civil engineer for the preparation for the closure and remediation of the Former GM Industrial site and the construction of a 9-hole golf course recreational facility (including Driving Range, Putting Course, Clubhouse and Maintenance Facilities). David was responsible for the design of the golf course drainage system which included a 5-acre retention pond to be used for irrigation during periods of drought. His duties also included preparing cost estimates for the site closure and subsequent golf course construction, and the modeling and design of the facility entrance and parking. • Wegmans Food Pharmacy, Buffalo, New York (1998): Civil engineer for the construction of a supermarket on a former industrial site. David was responsible for and the modeling and design of the facility entrance. His duties also included field sampling of excavated soil during construction. • USACE-Buffalo District, Cuyahoga River Bulkheads Study, Ohio (1999): Civil Engineer for the USACE’s bulkhead inspection program along nine miles of the Cuyahoga River in Cleveland, Ohio. David was responsible for preparing a structural assessment of bulkhead along the river by inspecting various conditions of the sheet pile (i.e., corrosion levels, settling). His duties also included preparing remediation recommendations and subsequent cost estimates for damaged bulkhead sections. • USACE-Buffalo District, Advance Measures Program, New York (1999): Civil Engineer for the study of high Lake Erie levels on four residential areas. David was responsible for gathering residential home elevations and comparing them to historical rain and lake level data. Based on these comparisons and a detailed cost analysis, recommendations to alleviate local residential flooding, including the design of breakwaters and levees, were made. • FEMA Public Assistance Program, Puerto Rico (1998-1999): Civil Engineer for the inspection of public facilities damaged by Hurricane Georges. David was responsible for gathering field data on hurricane damages, designing mitigation alternatives, and preparing detailed cost analyses of damages. • NYCDDC Underground Storage Tank Program, New York (1999-2001): Civil Engineer for the design of groundwater/soil remediation systems for the cleanup of petroleum-contaminated groundwater and soils. Groundwater remediation systems typically consisted of the design and installation of pneumatic and electric dual pumping systems for the removal of free phase and dissolved phase contamination. Soil remediation systems incorporated the design and installation of soil vapor extraction systems and bioventing systems. • Lipari Landfill, New Jersey (1996-1997): Civil Engineer for offsite remediation work at the Lipari Superfund site. David was responsible for modeling migration rates of contaminants from the Superfund site through surrounding soil strata. (716)580-7000 www.thelotisgroup.com Lotis Environmental, LLC 8899 Main Street, Suite 107 Williamsville, NY 14221 KELLY R. REIDY-KACZMAREK Environmental Scientist, The Lotis Engineering Group, P.C. Environmental Scientist, Lotis Environmental, LLC Professional Experience The Lotis Engineering Group, P.C. – Environmental Scientist (April 2015 – Present) Lotis Environmental, LLC – Environmental Scientist (June 2019 – Present) 8899 Main Street- Suite 107 Williamsville, New York 14221 RJS Environmental – Environmental Specialist (March 2010 – April 2015) 4169 Allendale Parkway Blasdell, New York 14219 STOHL Environmental – Project Manager (May 2009 – March 2010) 4169 Allendale Parkway Blasdell, New York 14219 Education B.A., Environmental Science and Biological Science, State College at Brockport, 2009 Certifications ASTM Conference on Environmental Site Assessments for Property Transfer New York State and EPA Certified Asbestos Air and Project Monitoring Technician (lapsed) New York State Asbestos Inspector (lapsed) OSHA 10-hour Construction Safety Training Key Qualifications Since 2010, Kelly Reidy has been involved in various aspects of the environmental field with extensive experience in environmental due diligence. She has completed hundreds of environmental site assessments and reports, including Transaction Screens, Phase I assessments, and intrusive (Phase II) studies that range from farmland, to shopping plazas, to heavy industrial sites. Commercial Lending Experience • First Niagara Bank, Nationwide, US (2010-2015): Environmental Consultant for services relating to acquisitions and commercial lending of properties throughout the United States. Services include Transaction Screens, Desktop Reviews, Limited Database Reviews, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and Phase II Intrusive studies. • Lake Shore Savings Bank, Western New York, US (2012-2015): Environmental Consultant for services relating to acquisitions and commercial lending of properties throughout Western New York. Services include Transaction Screens, Desktop Reviews, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and Phase II Intrusive studies. • M&T Bank, New York State, US (2010-2015): Environmental Consultant for services relating to acquisitions and commercial lending of properties throughout New York State. Services include Transaction Screens, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and Phase II Intrusive studies. (716)580-7000 www.thelotisgroup.com Lotis Environmental, LLC 8899 Main Street, Suite 107 Williamsville, NY 14221 • Bank of Akron, Western New York, US (2012-2015): Environmental Consultant for services relating to acquisitions and commercial lending of properties throughout Western New York. Services include Transaction Screens, Desktop Reviews, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and Phase II Intrusive studies. Telecommunications Experience • Vertical Bridge Holdings, LLC, Nationwide, US (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • Blue Sky Towers, LLC, Nationwide, US (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • InSite Towers, LLC, Nationwide, US (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • IWG-TLA Telecom, LLC, Nationwide, US (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • Turris Sites, Canada (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • Phoenix Towers International, Nationwide, US (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • Tower Ventures, LLC, Nationwide, US (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. (716)580-7000 www.thelotisgroup.com Lotis Environmental, LLC 8899 Main Street, Suite 107 Williamsville, NY 14221 MATTHEW J. GREEN Environmental Professional, The Lotis Engineering Group, P.C. Environmental Professional, Lotis Environmental, LLC Professional Experience The Lotis Engineering Group, P.C. (September 2015 – Present) Lotis Environmental, LLC (June 2019 – Present) 8899 Main Street- Suite 107 Williamsville, New York 14221 Town of Amherst Environmental Control – Summer Help (May 2015 – September 2015) 455 Tonawanda Creek Road Buffalo, New York 14228 Education B.S., Environmental Studies, State University of New York at Buffalo, 2015 Certifications New York State Asbestos Inspector (lapsed) New York State Lead Inspector Key Qualifications Since 2015, Matthew Green has been involved in various aspects of the environmental field with extensive experience in environmental due diligence. He has completed hundreds of environmental site assessments and reports, including Transaction Screens, Phase I assessments, and intrusive (Phase II) studies that range from farmland, to shopping plazas, to heavy industrial sites. He has conducted hundreds of in-field site assessments across the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. Matthew has also assisted in the completion of hundreds of NEPA compliance studies, specifically in the telecommunications industry. Commercial Lending Experience • Canandaigua National Bank, Statewide, US (2017-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to acquisitions and commercial lending of properties throughout New York State. Services include Transaction Screens, Desktop Reviews, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and Phase II Intrusive studies. • First Niagara Bank, Nationwide, US (2016-2016): Environmental Consultant for services relating to acquisitions and commercial lending of properties throughout the United States. Services include Transaction Screens, Desktop Reviews, Limited Database Reviews, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and Phase II Intrusive studies. • Upstate National Bank, Statewide, US (2018-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to acquisitions and commercial lending of properties throughout New York State. Services include Transaction Screens, Desktop Reviews, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and Phase II Intrusive studies. • Pioneer Bank, Statewide, US (2017-2018): Environmental Consultant for services relating to acquisitions and commercial lending of properties throughout New York State. Services include Transaction Screens, Desktop Reviews, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and Phase II Intrusive studies. (716)580-7000 www.thelotisgroup.com Lotis Environmental, LLC 8899 Main Street, Suite 107 Williamsville, NY 14221 Telecommunications Experience • Vertical Bridge Holdings, LLC, Nationwide, US (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • Blue Sky Towers, LLC, Nationwide, US (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • InSite Towers, LLC, Nationwide, US (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • IWG-TLA Telecom, LLC, Nationwide, US (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • Turris Sites, Canada (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • Phoenix Towers International, Nationwide, US (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • Tower Ventures, LLC, Nationwide, US (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • Weiss Towers, Nationwide, US (2017-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition and development of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. • Telecom Lease Advisors, Nationwide, US (2015-ongoing): Environmental Consultant for services relating to the acquisition of telecommunications tower sites throughout the United States. Services include Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and NEPA compliance studies. Other Experience • Town of Amherst Environmental Control, town wide, US (Summer of 2015): Performed Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) inspection on various restaurants. Collected FOG samples for EPA 1664 analysis as well as assisted in the investigation and follow through of sewer blockages. • Grand Island Central School District, Districtwide, US, East Aurora Central School District, Districtwide, US and Lancaster Central School District, Districtwide, US (2016 Testing Cycle): Conducted lead testing in potable water for district schools and facilities. Was responsible for providing guidance to faculty and staff on proper preparation of potable outlets prior to testing, collecting water samples, completing chain of custody forms, and preparing a written report for each school identifying lead levels at all outlets tested. Area 1, Estate Anguilla Biological Community Description BIO SURVEY AND ENDANGERED SPECIES ASSESSMENT A biosurvey of the study site was conducted to assess the habitat types on the site and to determine if protected plants and animals were present. Lists containing the xx identified plant species are provided, as well at xx bird species, and 1 lizard. No protected species were observed or recorded. Plot #3 Estate Long Point and Cotton Garden. East End B Quarter. St. Croix USVI Area 1, Estate Anguilla Biological Community Description Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 Methods ..................................................................................................................... 3 Results ....................................................................................................................... 4 Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................................... 4 Vegetation Surveys ................................................................................................. 4 Animal Species ....................................................................................................... 6 Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 7 References ................................................................................................................. 8 3 Introduction Biologists and field technicians from Geographic Consulting LLC (GC) conducted a biological survey on Plot #3 Estate Long Point and Cotton Garden, east Quarter of St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands. The subject property is on the easter north shore. The site map provided by Blue Sky Indicated property boundaries and the potential Earth Change area. These boundaries are overlaid on the map in this report. The biosurvey is a means to determine the presence or absence of endangered or threatened terrestrial plant and animal species. This report documents this search, which is mandated by local and federal statutes. Territorial law lists plant and animal species requiring protection. We include these in Appendix I of this report. The local law applying to this project is the Virgin Islands “Endangered and Indigenous Species Act of 1990” Title 12, Virgin Islands Code, Chapter 2, Protection of Indigenous, Endangered and Threatened Fish, Wildlife and Plants. A higher order of protection for a shorter list of species is proscribed by the U.S. “Endangered Species Act of 1973”. Pub. L. 98- 205, Dec 28, 1978, 81 Stat 884, and amendments thereto, codified in 16 U.S.C. section 1531 et seq. Federal protection applies to two St. Croix plants listed as “Endangered”: Vahl’s Boxwood (Buxus vahlii) and Tropical Lilythorn (Catesbaea melanocarpa). Eggers’ Agave (Agave eggersiana) is listed as “Candidate”. This status is preliminary to intended listing but carries less federal protection than “endangered” or “threatened” status. Two lizard species pertinent to this study are the St. Croix ground lizard (Ameiva polops) and the litter-dwelling gecko (Sphaerodactylus beattyi), which are both federally protected and have the potential to inhabit the survey site. Methods Geographic Consulting’s (GC) field team consisted of forest ecologist, Brian Daley PhD, and two field technicians. Site maps were prepared prior to field work and uploaded to GCs online cloud storage and accessed through ESRI ARCGIS Online (AGOL). Our team accessed these data through Galaxy tab E tablets. Field data and photographs were recorded via these tables. Paper maps were printed for the field crew to use as a reference in the field and in case cell network data was insufficient. Fieldwork was conducted between January 9 and January 25, 2024. The field team traversed the site making observations of plants, birds and reptiles and recording these observations on the Galaxy tablets. Trees over three inches in diameter at breast height (DBH) were recorded with a photograph and their location (GPS point). These trees were identified to the species level whenever possible. Trees were also marked in the field with flagging tape in addition to being recorded in the GIS. The subject site is characterized by steep slopes and rugged terrain. The forest on site is low, single-canopy, secondary forest. This dry forest type is characteristic of the arid east end of 4 St. Croix. It is slow growing, but with a closed canopy comprised of primarily native species. This is indicative of a post-agricultural land clearing, but one that occurred decades ago. Results Threatened and Endangered Species As described in the Methods Section in greater detail, a systematic search was completed of the plants and animals of the subject property. No rare plant species protected by Virgin Islands or federal statutes were encountered. No rare vertebrate animals protected by Virgin Islands or federal statutes were observed during our comprehensive biosurvey. Vegetation Surveys The major plant communities of the dry forest observed were dry semi-deciduous woodlands and dry evergreen scrubland. These observations and their spatial distribution are depicted in Figure 1. The figure indicates the property boundaries in blue and the locations of the observed trees over 3 inches DBH are indicated in light green. The 15-foot access road is indicated in dashed red lines. The field team walked this line, making observations, but did not mark trees in this narrow band. No threatened or endangered species were observed in the main portion of the proposed development or in the access road. The vast majority of the species observed are native trees to the Virgin Islands dry forest. Some exotic invasive species were also observed and recorded, such as tan tan (Leucaena leucocephala). The method of selecting only trees above three inches dbh tends to exclude these smaller diameter plants. 5 Figure 1 Subject property boundary and locations of observed trees. Trees above three inches dbh were observed across the site. The focus of this biosurvey was the area within and adjacent to the potential earth change area marked by the black dotted line in Figure 1. The trees were identified to the species level and the findings are summarized in Table 1, below. Table 1. The classification and quantity of the woody plants observed on site. Genus species Bourreria succulenta Pigeonberry 47 Bursera simaruba Turpentine 8 Capparis cynophallophora Jamaican Caper 2 Ficus benjamina Ficus 1 Krugiodendron ferreum Ironwood 3 Leucaena leucocephala Tan-tan 7 Piscidia carthagenensis Fish Poison 19 Pithecellobium unguis-cati Bread and Cheese 1 Randia aculeata Inkberry 5 Unknown Boraginaceae spp Relative to pigeonberry 9 Exostema caribaeum Princewood 9 Comocladia dodonaea Christmas Bush 1 Eugenia Spp. Eugenia 2 Grand Total 114 6 Animal Species We observed 13 bird species across the surveyed areas, all of them native (Table 2). The most common sighted birds were the gray kingbird (Tyrannus dominicensis), Yellow warbler (Setophaga petechia), bananaquit (Coereba flaveola), Green-throated Carib (Eulampis holosericeus), Antillean crested hummingbird (Orthorhynchus cristatus), and Pearly-eyed thrasher (Margarops fuscatus). We spotted a pair of red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) hunting in the air overhead, but they did not land on the property. A flock of Smooth-billed ani (Crotophaga ani) was heard on a single occasion, but not seen. A single native lizard species was observed, the St. Croix anole (Anolis acutus). No amphibians were detected, but it is likely the Antillean tree frog (Eleutherodactylis antillana), and the Cuban tree frog (Osteopilus septentrionalis) were present. The small Indian mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus) and black rat (Rattus rattus) were also observed on the site. These are exotic species and not protected. No other vertebrate animals were sighted. Table 2 summarizes the bird species observed. 7 Table 2. Bird species observed during the biosurvey, listed by species, common name and family as well as native ranges for each. Species name Common name Family Family Relatives Range/ Nativity Buteo jamaicensis Hawk, Red-tailed Accipitridae Eagles & Hawks Canada to CA & WI Patagioenas squamosa Scaly-naped pigeon Columbidae Pigeons & Doves WI except Bahamas Patagioenas leucocephala White-crowned pigeon Columbidae Pigeons & Doves CA, S. US, Greater Antilles to Antigua Columbina passerina Common ground dove Columbidae Pigeons & Doves WI, So USA, CA, N SA Zenaida aurita Zenaida dove Columbidae Pigeons & Doves WI to CA coast Crotophaga ani Ani, smoothed-billed Cucuildae Cuckoos & Anis Trop s US, WI, to Brazil Coereba flaveola Bananaquit Emberizidae Wood Warblers, Blackbirds, Tanagers WI, except Cuba, CA, SA Margarops fuscatus Thrasher, Pearly- eyed Mimidae Mockingbirds & Thrashers E. Bahamas, PR to St. Vincent Setophaga petechia Yellow warbler Parulidae New World warblers NA, CA, WI Eulampis holosericeus Green-throated Carib Trochilidae Hummingbirds E. PR, VI & LA Orthorhyncus cristatus Hummingbird, Antillean Crested Trochilidae Hummingbirds E. PR, VI & LA Tyrannus dominicensis Kingbird, Gray Tyrannidae Tyrant Flycatchers FL, WI, N. SA Recommendations No protected animal or plant species were encountered after a complete biosurvey of the subject area. Therefore, we recommend that the land clearing activity on the site may proceed as planned within the boundaries presented to us. The native forest growing of the property is relatively diverse and represents decades of growth. We further recommend minimizing the impact to the forest outside the proposed area and monitoring the work closely during the land clearing process. 8 References Acevedo-Rodriguez, P. 1996. Flora of St. John. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden, Vol. 78. Bronx, NY. 582 pp. Daley, B., J. Valiulis, & R. Slatton. 2012. Exotic Invasive Species; US Virgin Islands; Species Affecting Forests. Doc.#GS-VIDA-1201. St. Croix, US Virgin Islands. Daley, Brian and Jennifer Valiulis. 2013 Rapid Assessment of Four Endangered Plant Populations of St. Croix, US Virgin Islands, Buxus vahlii and Catesbaea melanocarpa. For the Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources, Frederiksted, St. Croix, US Virgin Islands. 14pp. Encyclopedia of Life. Web. http://www.eol.org Accessed: March 24, 2024. Flora of the West Indies. Web. http://botany.si.edu/antilles/WestIndies/catalog.htm. National Museum of Natural History. Smithsonian Institution. Accessed: March 25, 2024. APPENDIX J: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) - FCC NEPA SUMMARY REPORT (716)580-7000 www.thelotisgroup.com Lotis Environmental, LLC 8899 Main Street, Suite 107 Williamsville, NY 14221 June 26, 2024 Ms. Laurie Plaisance Blue Sky Towers III, LLC 352 Park Street, Suite 106 North Reading, Massachusetts 01864 RE: FCC NEPA Summary Report for: East End Site (USVI-00230; BST_228) near Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, St. Croix, Virgin Islands 00820 Dear Ms. Plaisance, Lotis Environmental, LLC (Lotis), has completed a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) NEPA investigation relative to the referenced proposed undertaking and issues the following Summary Report. Based on the information presented in this report, no further action is required under 47 CFR Subpart 1, Chapter 1, Sections 1.1301-1.1319 of the National Environmental Policy Act. The accuracy of the species list, provided by the Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) website, should be verified every 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The United States Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) recommends that verification be completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the initial list. If the list is determined to have been modified to include additional species of concern, an evaluation of those species should be conducted and consultation with the USFWS may have to be re-initiated, depending on the determination of effect or previous response(s) from the USFWS. The applicant/tower builder must immediately notify all interested consulting parties if archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (716)-580-7000. Sincerely, Lotis Environmental, LLC David N. Robinson, P.E. President / CEO Robinson@TheLotisGroup.com Attachments NEPA SUMMARY REPORT June 26, 2024 USVI-00230 - East End near Plot 3 Estate Long Point & Cotton Garden Eastend B Quarter, Virgin Islands 00820 Prepared for: Blue Sky Towers III, LLC 352 Park Street, Suite 106 North Reading, Massachusetts 01864 Prepared by: Lotis Environmental, LLC Williamsville, New York Reviewed By: Miles Walz-Salvador. Nationwide NEPA / NHPA Manager Prepared By: DeAnna Anglin Senior Biologist/NEPA Project Lead Blue Sky Towers III, LLC NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End FCC NEPA CHECKLIST Applicant Name: Site Number: Site Name: Blue Sky Towers III, LLC USVI-00230 East End Potential Effect LAND USE SCREENING Yes No 1. Facility will be located in an officially designated wilderness area. X 2. Facility will be located in an officially designated wildlife preserve. X 3. Facility may affect listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats; or is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed endangered or threatened species or likely to result in the destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitats. X 4. Facility may affect districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that are listed, or are eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places. X 5. Facility may affect Native American religious site(s). X 6. Facility will be located in a floodplain if the facility will not be placed at least one foot above the base flood elevation of the floodplain. *EA not required under FCC Wireless Telecommunications Docket No. 17-79 effective July 2, 2018, as long as the applicant can show that the facility and/or associated equipment will be installed 1 foot above the determined BFE. X 7. Facility construction will involve significant change in surface features (e.g., wetland fill, deforestation, significant tree removal, or water diversion). X 8. Facility (antenna tower and/or supporting structures) will be equipped with high intensity white lights which are to be located in residential neighborhoods, as defined by the applicable zoning law. X 9. Facility would cause human exposure to levels of radiofrequency radiation in excess of Commission-adopted guidelines X 10. Facility will be over 450 feet above ground level (AGL) X Prepared By: DeAnna Anglin Senior Biologist/NEPA Specialist NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End DOCUMENTATION FOR FCC NEPA CHECKLIST RESPONSES 1-9: 1. Is the proposed undertaking located in an officially designated wilderness area? Based on maps published by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), United States Forest Service (USFS), and National Park Service (NPS), as compiled in the on-line nationalatlas.gov and wilderness.net websites, no designated wilderness areas are located at or near the proposed undertaking. A copy of the Wilderness Map is included in Appendix A. 2. Is the proposed undertaking located in an officially designated wildlife preserve? Based on maps published by the USFWS, no wildlife refuges or wildlife preserves are located at or near the proposed undertaking. A copy of the USFWS Wildlife Refuge Map is included in Appendix A. 3. Will the proposed undertaking likely affect threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats; or is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed endangered or threatened species; or is likely to result in the destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitats (as determined by the Endangered Species Act of 1973)? A Lotis staff biologist conducted an informal biological assessment (IBA) at the site of the proposed undertaking. Based on information reviewed, site reconnaissance, and the proposed scope of work, Lotis has determined that the proposed undertaking would “not likely adversely affect” designated critical habitats or listed federal species of concern. A copy of the USFWS Critical Habitat Map is included in Appendix A. The accuracy of the species list, provided by the Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) website, should be verified every 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The USFWS recommends that verification be completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the initial list. If the list is determined to have been modified to include additional species of concern, an evaluation of said species should be conducted and consultation under USFWS guidelines may have to be re-initiated, depending on the determination of effect or previous response from the USFWS. Lotis submitted the proposed undertaking summary package to the USFWS, Caribbean Ecological Services Field Office on May 24, 2024, for informal Section 7 consultation under the Endangered Species Act (50 CFR Part 402.01). In the submission, Lotis requested the USFWS to determine if the proposed undertaking would have an effect on any wildlife refuges or if the proposed undertaking would have an adverse impact on: 1) any listed and/or proposed threatened or endangered species; or 2) any designated and/or proposed critical habitats. On June 7, 2024, Lotis received a response, via email, indicating “We have reviewed the information provided in your letter and our files, and concur with your determination that the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the green, hawksbill and leatherback sea turtles with the implementation of the conservation measures provided by IPaC.” Copies of the USFWS submission cover letter and USFWS response are included in Appendix B. Additionally, the USFWS has established interim guidelines for recommendations on communication tower siting, construction, operation, and decommissioning as new and existing towers have been determined to significantly impact species which are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), http://www.fws.gov/laws/ lawsdigest/migtrea.html, (16 U.S.C. 703-712). The MBTA prohibits the taking, killing, possession, transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests, except when specifically authorized by the Department of the Interior. While the Act has no provision for allowing unauthorized take, it must be recognized that some birds may be killed at structures such as communications towers even if all reasonable measures to avoid it are implemented. While it is not possible under the Act to absolve individuals or companies from liability if they follow these recommended guidelines, the Division of Law Enforcement and Department of Justice have used enforcement and prosecutorial discretion in the past regarding individuals or companies who have made good faith efforts to avoid the take of migratory birds. A copy of the 2021 Recommended Best Practices for Communication Tower Design, Siting, Construction, Operation, Maintenance, and Decommissioning is included in Appendix B. NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End BST has taken these recommended interim guidelines into consideration and has mitigated the potential effect on migratory birds by siting the proposed undertaking away from sensitive locations such as critical habitats, wilderness areas, wildlife refuges, and wetlands, where species of concern are more likely to be present. Additionally, BST proposes a tower height of no more than 199 feet with a tower design to be that of a self-supporting monopole tower. If lighting is required, BST will complete request the use of dual medium white or red strobe lights with the minimum number, minimum intensity, and minimum number of flashes per minute allowable by the FAA. The USFWS also regulates and enforces the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668c). “This Act provides criminal penalties for persons who "take, possess, sell, purchase, barter, offer to sell, purchase or barter, transport, export or import, at any time or any manner, any bald eagle ... [or any golden eagle], alive or dead, or any part, nest, or egg thereof." The Act defines "take" as "pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb." "Disturb" means “to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to a degree that causes, or is likely to cause, based on the best scientific information available, 1) injury to an eagle, 2) a decrease in its productivity, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior, or 3) nest abandonment, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior." In addition to immediate impacts, this definition also covers impacts that result from human-induced alterations initiated around a previously used nest site during a time when eagles are not present, if, upon the eagle's return, such alterations agitate or bother an eagle to a degree that interferes with or interrupts normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering habits, and causes injury, death or nest abandonment. A violation of the Act can result in a fine of $100,000 ($200,000 for organizations), imprisonment for one year, or both, for a first offense. Penalties increase substantially for additional offenses, and a second violation of this Act is a felony.” USFWS: The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2010-title16/pdf/USCODE-2010-title16-chap5A-subchapII.pdf (accessed January 2024). A copy of the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act is included in Appendix B. The USFWS has recommended voluntary minimization/mitigation as indicated above. These are recommendations and should be treated as such unless issued as a requirement to complete Section 7 consultation. Should failure to abide by these recommendations occur, the applicant is assuming responsibility for its failure to comply with the above-mentioned Endangered Species Act (ESA), Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), and The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEA). It is ultimately the responsibility of the applicant to prevent the “take” of a species of concern regardless of whether or not it has completed Section 7 consultation. The term “take” means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. The taking of a listed species of concern (threatened/Endangered), without a federal/state permit, is a severe crime punishable by large fine(s) and confinement. In addition, Lotis contacted the Virgin Islands Conservation Society (VICS) on May 24, 2024, and requested a review of the potential adverse effect on state protected habitats and state listed species of concern. As of the date of this report, no response has been received from VICS. A copy of the submission letter is included in Appendix B. 4. Will the proposed undertaking affect districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects, significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that are listed (or eligible for listing) in the National Register of Historic Places? The United States Virgin Islands Department of Planning & Natural Resources (VISHPO) is the lead State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for the State of Virgin Islands. Lotis contracted CocoSol International Inc. to determine the potential effect of the proposed undertaking on historic properties (archaeological sites and eligible/listed historic properties) within the Direct and ½-mile Visual Area of Potential Effect (APE) designated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). CocoSol International Inc. completed a Phase I (A&B) Archaeological Survey and conducted research to identify historic properties using resources specified by the VISHPO. Additionally, CocoSol International Inc. researched the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) at http://www.nps.gov/nr/ and identified one (1) historic property within the ½-mile radius APE of the proposed undertaking. A copy of the Phase I (A&B) Archaeological Survey is included in Attachment 3. Lotis prepared and submitted a new tower submission packet (FCC Form 620) through the FCC’s E-106 electronic filing protocol. Section 106 review was initially submitted via E-106 to the Virgin Islands SHPO on May 28, 2024. However, the Virgin Islands SHPO does not participate in E-106 electronic filing and requested that materials be sent via email for review. On May 24, 2024, Lotis forwarded the requested emailed submission via NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End david.brewer@dpnr.vi.gov and sean.krigger@dpnr.vi.gov. On June 26, 2024, Lotis received an email response from the VISHPO indicating “The VISHPO has no objection to the proposed monopole cell tower.” Copies of the VISHPO submission cover letter, FCC Form 620, and the VISHPO response are included in Appendix C. In furtherance of Section 106 consultation efforts, Lotis attempted to identify the jurisdiction’s Certified Local Government (CLG), by using the National Parks Service’s (NPS) website, http://grantsdev.cr.nps.gov/CLG_ Review/search.cfm. Unfortunately, the NPS’s website did not identify a CLG within the local jurisdiction, therefore, Lotis contacted the local jurisdiction for comment. On May 24, 2024, Lotis invited the Department of Planning and Natural Resources to comment on whether the proposed undertaking would have an effect on historic properties within the general vicinity. To date, Lotis has not received a response from Department of Planning and Natural Resources regarding the proposed undertaking. Copies of the submission cover letter, and email submission included in Attachment 6. Lotis attempted to locate a non-government affiliated group who had invested interest in historic preservation but was unable to do so. Therefore, no additional parties were contacted for the opportunity to comment on the proposed undertaking’s potential impact on local historic properties which may not have been determined eligible for listing on the National Register for Historic Places (NRHP). Finally, Lotis contacted the Virgin Islands Daily News and published a legal public notice in the classified section on May 29, 2024. The proposed undertaking was detailed in the ad and calls for public concerns regarding potential adverse effect on historic properties in the area were solicited. To date, Lotis has not received any public response from the public notice publication concerning the proposed undertaking’s potential effect on historic properties. Copies of the legal public notice text, tear sheet, and Affidavit of Publication are included in Attachment 7. 5. Will the undertaking affect Indian religious site(s)? Lotis utilized the FCC’s Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) to identify tribal entities with interest in the proposed undertaking. The initial TCNS filing was submitted on October 31, 2023. The FCC responded via e-mail on November 3, 2023, indicating that no nationally recognized tribes were forwarded information regarding the location of the proposed undertaking via electronic or regular mail. Copies of the Federal Lands Map and Indian Reservations Map are included in Appendix A. Copies of the TCNS documentation and NOO are included in Appendix D. 6. Is the proposed undertaking located within a flood plain (100-year)? According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the Virgin Island, Terr / St. Croix,S, Virgin Islands (Map Number 7800000075G) published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) effective on April 16, 2007 and exported on November 1, 2023, the proposed undertaking is not located within a 100-year floodplain. A copy of the FIRMette (flood plain map) is included in Appendix E.. 7. Will construction of the proposed undertaking involve significant change in surface features (e.g., wetland fill, deforestation or water diversion)? According to the online United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory Map (NWIM), http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html, no mapped wetlands are located at or within close proximity to the proposed undertaking. A copy of the National Wetlands Inventory Map is included in Appendix F. 8. Is the proposed undertaking located in a residential neighborhood and is it required to be equipped with high intensity white lights (as defined by local zoning law)? Lotis was informed that the proposed undertaking is not to be equipped with high intensity white lights nor located within a zoned residential neighborhood. NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End 9. a.) Will the antenna structure equal or exceed total power (of all channels) of 2000 Watts ERP (3280 Watts EIRP) and have antenna located less than 10 meters above ground level? Per the applicant, the antenna structure will comply with the established criteria regarding radio frequency exposure limits in accordance with FCC rules, including those rules found at 47 CFR § 1.1307 and § 1.1310, as published at the time of this report. b.) Will the antenna structure equal or exceed total power (of all channels) of 2000 Watts ERP (3280 Watts EIRP) and have antenna located less than 10 meters above floor level? Per the applicant, the antenna structure will comply with the established criteria regarding radio frequency exposure limits in accordance with FCC rules, including those rules found at 47 CFR § 1.1307 and § 1.1310, as published at the time of this report. 10. Facility will be over 450 feet above ground level (AGL)? The proposed undertaking is not above 450 feet AGL. National Historic and Scenic Trail Review Per the Per the 1999 “Siting of Wireless Telecommunications facilities Near National Scenic Trails Resolution early notification is not necessary if the “Proposed sites that are more than one mile from a National Scenic Trail are outside the scope of this Resolution. Under certain circumstances, MSTOs and Applicants may find it mutually beneficial to have a cooperative working relationship on proposed sites that are more than one mile but less than four miles from a National Scenic Trail, particularly when constructing new or expanded towers 200 feet or higher above ground level which require lighting. While the signatories to this Resolution strongly encourage the formation of such alliances, the MSTO and the Applicant are not obligated to do so.” The proposed undertaking is located more than four miles from the closest national scenic historic trail. Therefore, no additional consultation is required. A copy of the National Historic and Scenic Trail Map is included in Appendix A. National Scenic Riverway Review Congress enacted the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) in 1968, declaring it the “policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free- flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations.” 16 U.S.C. § 1271. As originally enacted, the WSRA named specific rivers or segments of rivers for inclusion in the Wild and Scenic River System (“WSRS”). Id. § 1274(a)(1)-(a)(8). The proposed undertaking is located more than one mile from the closest national scenic riverway. Therefore, no additional consultation is required. A copy of the National Scenic Riverway Map is included in Appendix A. National Scenic Byway Review The National Scenic Byways Program was established under the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 and is part of the Department of Transportation's (DOT) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The program is a grass-roots collaborative effort established to help recognize, preserve, and enhance selected roads throughout the United States. Pursuant to the program, the Secretary of Transportation recognizes certain roads as All-American Roads or National Scenic Byways based on one or more archeological, cultural, historic, natural, recreational, and scenic qualities. The proposed undertaking is located more than one mile from the closest national byway. Therefore, no additional consultation is required. A copy of the National Scenic Byway Map is included in Appendix A. NEPA Summary Report Lotis Environmental, LLC - BST_228 USVI-00230 - East End Appendix A Maps Site Location Site Location Hawaii Alaska HONOLULU HAWAII Hawaii Maui Oahu Kauai Niihau Molokai PACIFIC OCEAN Yuko n PACI FI C O CEAN GULF OF ALASKA BERING SEA AR CT IC O C E A N BEA UF OR T S EA MAINE VT. N.H. N.J. N.J. DEL. CONN. MD. VIRGINIA DEL. MD. VA. NORTH CAROLINA SOUTH CAROLINA KENTUCKY TENNESSEE MISSISSIPPI LOUISIANA TEXAS OKLAHOMA KANSAS NEBRASKA SOUTH DAKOTA NORTH DAKOTA MONTANA WASHINGTON OREGON CALIFORNIA NEVADA ARIZONA NEW MEXICO UTAH IDAHO WYOMING COLORADO ARKANSAS ALABAMA GEORGIA FLORIDA OHIO INDIANA ILLINOIS MICHIGAN WISCONSIN IOWA MISSOURI MINNESOTA MASS. R.I. NEW YORK PENNSYLVANIA WEST VIRGINIA ALASKA UNITED STATES MEXICO CANADA UNITED STATES UNITED STA TES CANADA U N I T E D S T A T ES M E X I C O UNITED STATES CANADA OLYMPIA SALEM PORTLAND OREGON CITY HELENA BOZEMAN OGDEN MISSOULA GREAT FALLS BISMARCK BILLINGS FARGO AUGUSTA MONTPELIER BUFFALO CONCORD BOISE LOS ANGELES SAN DIEGO RIVERSIDE LAS VEGAS MINNEAPOLIS ST. PAUL ALBANY SYRACUSE ROCHESTER PIERRE PROVIDENCE HARTFORD NEW YORK CITY LANSING GRAND RAPIDS MADISON TRENTON PHILADELPHIA PITTSBURGH DES MOINES CHEYENNE CASPER CARSON CITY SACRAMENTO LINCOLN OMAHA COUNCIL BLUFFS ST. JOSEPH ATCHISON COLUMBUS DAYTON CINCINNATI CLEVELAND AKRON TOLEDO DETROIT MILWAUKEE CHICAGO ANNAPOLIS WASHINGTON, D.C. BALTIMORE DOVER INDIANAPOLIS SPRINGFIELD ST. LOUIS NAUVOO TOPEKA FRANKFORT JEFFERSON CITY KANSAS CITY INDEPENDENCE RALEIGH CHARLOTTE MORGANTON ABINGDON NASHVILLE ELIZABETHTON CHATTANOOGA OKLAHOMA CITY TAHLEQUAH COLUMBIA CHARLESTON LITTLE ROCK PHOENIX TUCSON SALT LAKE CITY ALBUQUERQUE DURANGO EL PASO MONTGOMERY SELMA ATLANTA MEMPHIS JACKSON NATCHEZ NEW ORLEANS TALLAHASSEE PENSACOLA HILO KAILUA-KONA JACKSONVILLE TAMPA ORLANDO MIAMI ST. PETERSBURG BATON ROUGE AUSTIN SAN ANTONIO DALLAS FT WORTH HOUSTON CHARLESTON RICHMOND NORFOLK See inset map below WINSTON- SALEM HARRISBURG SEATTLE BOSTON SANTA FE DENVER SAN FRANCISCO NOME ANCHORAGE SEWARD JUNEAU BATTLE CREEK BOULDER CHARLOTTESVILLE WILLIAMSBURG CORVALLIS CUMBERLAND DULUTH EUGENE FAYETTEVILLE COLLEGE STATION NACOGDOCHES FLAGSTAFF GRAND JUNCTION HAGERSTOWN HUNTSVILLE CLEVELAND ITHACA JANESVILLE JOHNSON CITY LAREDO LAS CRUCES LAWRENCE LEWISTON MONTEREY MURFREESBORO MUSKEGON NAPLES NEWPORT AMHERST SPRINGFIELD OAKLAND STOCKTON POCATELLO POUGHKEEPSIE PITTSFIELD REDDING MEDFORD RENO KENNEWICK RICHLAND PASCO ROANOKE ELKIN SALINAS SAN JOSE SANTA BARBARA SAN LUIS OBISPO ST. GEORGE SIOUX CITY SPRINGFIELD UTICA WILMINGTON VIRGINIA BEACH ANNAPOLIS WASHINGTON, D.C. BALTIMORE DOVER RICHMOND NORFOLK WILLIAMSBURG VIRGINIA BEACH WAUSAU WEST PALM BEACH YUMA 95 93 87 84 80 68 78 64 64 85 40 95 95 26 20 20 40 59 24 65 55 59 12 49 20 10 30 35 27 44 40 35 70 70 45 20 10 35 37 85 85 75 75 10 65 4 16 95 81 79 77 81 64 64 57 55 24 72 44 35 80 80 29 75 75 74 65 71 65 69 70 83 64 85 95 70 83 76 79 94 94 96 43 90 39 35 90 90 90 86 70 76 15 84 84 15 82 5 5 5 8 10 10 17 40 19 25 25 80 80 29 94 43 88 39 55 74 69 75 75 70 77 71 81 81 88 91 90 95 90 89 80 90 90 94 196 135 Lake Okeechobee Finger Lakes C ol u m bi a S n ake Miss ou ri Y e ll o w s t o ne Great Salt Lake Lake of the Woods Pyramid Lake Walker Lake Salton Sea Sa cr a m e n t o San Joa qu in Gree n Pe cos C a n a di a n N i o br ar a Ar kan sas Pla tt e Mi ss ou ri T e n n e s s e e Mississippi Mi ss is si ppi Whit e A r k a n s a s O hi o Co lor ad o Rio Grande L A K E O NT ARIO L A K E H U R O N LAKE S UP ER IO R LAK E M ICH IGA N LA KE ERIE G U L F O F M E X I C O A T L A N T I C O C E A N P A CI F I C O CE A N Ala ba m a Bureau of Land Management National Forest System MEM Memorial NB National Battleﬁeld NBP National Battleﬁeld Park NHP National Historical Park NHS National Historic Site NL National Lakeshore NM National Monument N MEM National Memorial NMP National Military Park NP National Park N PRES National Preserve NRA National Recreation Area NRR National Recreational River N RES National Reserve NS National Seashore NSR National Scenic Riverway PKWY Parkway NF National Forest NG National Grassland NWR National Wildlife Refuge Fish and Wildlife Service Note: Abbreviations at right are for federal lands shown on this map. In many places, exact trail locations have not yet been determined. Portions of the trails indicated on this map may not be accessible for public use. Please check with individual trail clubs and man- aging ofﬁces for the latest available trail locations. National Park System Map revised April 2010. Only national park, forest areas, and wildlife refuges that relate to the National Trails System are shown. Bear Lake NWR Bear Valley NWR Clear Lake NWR Deer Flat NWR Franz Lake NWR Grays Lake NWR Julia Butler Hansen NWR Lewis and Clark NWR Lower Klamath NWR McNary NWR Pierce NWR Ridgeﬁeld NWR Ruby Lake NWR Steigerwald Lake NWR Three Arch Rocks NWR Tule Lake NWR Umatilla NWR Willapa NWR William L. Finley NWR Sequoyah NWR Sevilleta NWR Maxwell NWR Bosque Del Apache NWR Whittlesey Creek NWR Two Rivers NWR Tamarac NWR Swan Lake NWR Squaw Creek NWR Ozark Caveﬁsh NWR Desoto NWR Cypress Creek NWR Big Muddy NWR Wheeler NWR White River NWR Tennessee NWR St. Marks NWR Lower Hatchie NWR Holla Bend NWR Chickasaw NWR Wallkill River NWR Independence NHP Morristown NHP 13 15 16 14 1 Ohio River Islands NWR 9 7 3 6 12 11 5 10 18 17 18 17 2 4 8 13 15 20 20 19 19 16 14 1 9 7 3 6 12 11 5 10 2 4 8 Long Lake NWR Seedskadee NWR Benton Lake NWR Cokeville Meadows NWR Fish Springs NWR Charles M. Russell NWR Audubon NWR Lake Ilo NWR Lake Andes NWR Boyer Chute NWR Ul Bend NWR Karl E. Mundt NWR North Platte NWR Lee Metcalf NWR Blackwater Eastern Neck Eastern Shore Of Virginia Featherstone Fisherman Island James River Martin Mason Neck Nansemond Occoquan Bay Plum Tree Island Presquile Rappahannock River Valley Susquehanna 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Colonial NHP Fort McHenry NM George Washington Birthplace NM Piscataway Park Prince William Forest Park Richmond NBP 15 16 17 18 19 20 Chesapeake Bay area National Wildlife Refuges National Park sites Innoko NWR Alaska Maritime NWR Boston Harbor Islands NRA Mount Baker NF Olympic NF Okanogan NF Colville NF Kaniksu NF Kootenai NF Wenatchee NF Snoqualmie NF Gifford Pinchot NF Mount Hood NF Willamette NF Umpqua NF Rogue River NF Klamath NF Tahoe NF Eldorado NF Stanislaus NF Sierra NF Sequoia NF Angeles NF Cleveland NF Coronado NF Chugach NF Apache NF Cibola NF Carson NF San Isabel NF San Juan NF Rio Grande NF Gunnison NF White River NF Arapaho NF Pike NF Routt NF Roosevelt NF Medicine Bow NF Shoshone NF Teton NF Targhee NF Gallatin NF Gallatin NF Custer NF Beaverhead NF Salmon NF Bitterroot NF Deer Lodge NF Lolo NF Lolo NF Lewis and Clark NF Lewis and Clark NF Little Missouri NG Chippewa NF Chequamegon NF Shawnee NF Wayne NF Jefferson NF Cherokee NF Cherokee NF Nantahala NF Chattahochee NF Apalachicola NF Osceola NF Ocala NF Pisgah NF George Washington NF Green Mountain NF White Mountain NF Finger Lakes NF Allegheny NF Mark Twain NF Ouachita NF Ozark NF Ozark NF Ottawa NF Superior NF Hiawatha NF Hiawatha NF Manistee NF Sheyenne NG Ft Pierre NG Helena NF Flathead NF Nez Perce NF Clearwater NF Umatilla NF Umatilla NF Whitman NF Wallowa NF Bridger NF Caribou NF Cache NF Curlew NG Sawtooth NF Sawtooth NF Humboldt NF Humboldt NF Humboldt NF Humboldt NF Humboldt NF Dixie NF Kaibab NF Kaibab NF Coconino NF Tonto NF Fishlake NF Toiyabe NF Toiyabe NF Wasatch NF Unita NF Kiowa NG Comanche NG Cimarron NG Santa Fe NF Santa Fe NF Cibola NF Gila NF San Bernardino NF Los Padres NF Los Padres NF Shasta NF Modoc NF Lassen NF Plumas NF Toiyabe NF Inyo NF Deschutes NF Winema NF Golden Gate NRA City of Rocks N RES Big Cypress N PRES Big Hole NB Bear Paw Battleﬁeld Cowpens NB Chickamauga and Chattanooga NMP Stones River NB Kings Mountain NMP Lewis and Clark NHP Jefferson National Expansion MEM Pictured Rocks NL Nez Perce NHP Pecos NHP San Antonio Missions NHP Chamizal N MEM Tumacacori NHP Fort Union NM Hagerman Fossil Beds NM Chimney Rock NHS Scotts Bluff NM Pinnacles NM Devils Postpile NM Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes NWR George Washington Memorial PKWY Saguaro NP Walnut Canyon NM Lake Chelan NRA Delaware Water Gap NRA Fort Stanwix NM Santa Monica Mountains NRA Gulf Islands NS El Malpais NM North Cascades NP Glacier NP Mount Rainier NP Olympic NP Yellowstone NP Crater Lake NP Lassen Volcanic NP Rocky Mountain NP Yosemite NP Shenandoah NP Kings Canyon NP Death Valley NP Mojave N PRES Lake Mead NRA Glen Canyon NRA Grand Canyon NP Arches NP Colorado NM Curecanti NRA Great Sand Dunes NP Sequoia NP Great Smoky Mountains NP Hawai‘i Volcanoes NP Pu‘uhonua o Hönaunau NHP Kaloko-Honoköhau NHP Pu‘ukoholä Heiau NHS Fort Smith NHS Pea Ridge NMP Bent’s Old Fort NHS Fort Larned NHS Fort Union Trading Post NHS Knife River Indian Villages NHS Fort Laramie NHS Fort Vancouver NHS Chesapeake and Ohio Canal NHP Harpers Ferry NHP Blue Ridg e P K WY (fo llo ws Natchez T r ac e P KWY ) Sa i n t C r o i x N S R Missou r i N R R NEZ PERCE (NEE-ME-POO) NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL OREGO N N ATIO NAL H IS TORIC T R AIL C A L I F O RNIA N A TI O N A L SC ENI C T R AIL P A CI FI C C R E S T NA T I O N A L H I S T O R IC T RA IL P O N Y E XP RES S NA T I O N A L H IST ORIC TRAI L OL D SP A N I S H N A TI ON AL HIST O R I C T RAI L PACIFIC NORTHWEST NA TIONAL SCENIC TRAIL A RI ZO NA NA TIONAL SCENIC TRAIL JU AN B A U TIS TA D E A NZA N A TI ON A L H IST O R I C T RAIL SAN TA FE NATIONA L H I S T ORI C T RAIL MORMON PIONEER NA T I O NAL HI STO R I C T R AI L L E WI S AN D C LARK NATI O N A L HIS TORIC T RAI L IC E A GE NA TI O N A L S C ENI C TRAIL TRAIL O F TEA RS NAT IONA L H IS T O RI C TR AIL OVERMOUNTAIN VICTORY NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL SELMA TO MONTGOMERY NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL NAT CH E Z TRA C E N A TI O N AL S CENIC T R AIL F L OR IDA NATI ONA L SC E N IC T R AI L A P P AL ACH IAN N A TI O NA L SCENI C TR AIL ID IT A R O D N ATI O N AL HIS T O RI C T RAIL NO R T H C O U N T R Y N AT IO N A L SCE N I C T R A IL POTOMAC HERITAGE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL NEW ENGLAND NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL WASHINGTON-ROCHAMBEAU REVOLUTIONARY ROUTE NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL STAR-SPANGLED BANNER NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL CAPTAIN JOHN SMITH CHESAPEAKE NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL ALA KAHAKAI NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL CO NTI NE NTAL DIVIDE N ATION AL S C E N IC T RAI L EL CAMINO REAL DE TIERRA ADENTRO NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL EL CAMINO REAL DE LOS TEJAS NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL The four trails shown here as separate lines actually follow the same route in much of Nebraska and Wyoming. To Mexico City To Mexico City To central Mexico De si g n ate d r o u t e P r o p osed re lo ca ti o n 0 100 0 100 200 Miles 200 Kilometers Scale for all areas except Alaska 0 0 400 Miles 200 200 400 Kilometers North Site Location 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 91 91 93 93 89 87 81 81 81 81 83 85 85 85 79 79 77 77 77 75 71 71 69 69 65 65 65 65 59 59 57 55 55 55 55 55 49 45 43 43 39 37 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 29 29 29 27 25 25 25 25 19 17 15 15 15 15 15 5 5 5 5 5 8 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 4 12 16 20 20 20 20 20 20 24 26 26 30 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 44 64 64 64 64 66 68 70 70 70 70 70 70 76 74 74 74 76 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 84 84 84 84 82 86 88 88 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 96 76 10 15 72 90 80 75 86 95 99 Pend Oreille Co lum b i a R Co lu m b ia R Hungry Horse Reservoir Milk Flathead Lake M a dis o n R Yellowstone Lake Jackson Lake Ye llo w s to n e Fort Peck Lake Lake Oahe Niobrara River Lake Sakakawea Lake Francis Case Platte North River South Platte Green R Colorado River Seminoe Reservoir Pathfinder Reservoir Arkansas River Tuttle Creek Lake Willamette R Snake Great Salt Lake Utah Lake Lake Powell Little Colorado River Gila Pecos River Amistad Reservoir Gr a n de Pyramid Lake Lake Tahoe Salton Sea C olo ra d o Lake Mead San Juan River Rio Grande Canadian River Red Arkansas River Brazos River Lake Texoma Lake of the Woods R a i n y R Upper Red Lake Lower Red Lake Leech Lake M i s s i s s i p p i M in n e s o t a River R M en o m i nee St Jo hn River Moosehead Lake Lake Champlain R R S u squ eha n na R Il li n o is River Wa b a s h River River New R James R Po t o m a c R Roanoke R River Missouri River Lake of the Ozarks Table Rock Lake Bull Shoals Lake Norfork Lake Eufaula Lake W h it e River R Red Sabine R Sam Rayburn Reservoir M is si ss i pp i River Lake Okeechobee S t John s R Chat ta ho oc hee R Martin Lake A la bam a R To mb i gb ee R Yazoo R Kentucky Lake Lake Barkley R Dale Hollow Lake Hartwell Lake Lake Sidney Lanier Sav a n na h River American Falls Res River Missouri River River River River R Lake McConaughy Lake Lake Koocanusa D es M o ines St C ro i x Ohio All egh en y R Walter F George Lake Leaf R S na ke R R River M ar ia s Harry S Truman Res Lake Winnebago C umb er land Conn ec ticut H ud son Ca pe Fear R T enn es see River Milford Lake Flaming Gorge Reservoir Goose Lake Elephant Butte Reservoir Shasta Lake Lake Livingston J Strom Thurmond Lake Mono Lake Robert S Kerr Res Lewis Smith Lake John H Kerr Res Weiss Lake Lake O' The Cherokees Navajo Reservoir Honey Lake Lake Winnibigoshish Stockton Lake Carlyle Lake Owyhee Res Sun River River River River Platte River Red River River Muskegon River G U L F O F M E X I C O P A C I F I C O C E A N L a k e S u p e r i o r L a k e M i c h i g a n L a k e H u r o n L a k e E r i e O n t a r i o L a k e G U L F O F C A L I F O R N I A O C E A N A T L A N T I C Portland Lakewood Albuquerque Hadley Atlanta HEADQUARTERS Washington, D.C. Bloomington Sacramento TROPIC OF CANCER TROPIC OF CANCER Montpelier Augusta Concord Albany Trenton Harrisburg Annapolis Dover Charleston Frankfort Jefferson City Santa Fe Cheyenne Bismarck Pierre Helena Carson City Olympia Boston Providence Hartford Richmond Columbia Raleigh Atlanta Montgomery Tallahassee Jackson Nashville Indianapolis Columbus Lansing Madison Springfield St Paul Des Moines Lincoln Topeka Little Rock Oklahoma City Baton Rouge Austin Denver Boise Salt Lake City Salem Sacramento Phoenix Washington Los Angeles San Diego New York Philadelphia Dallas Houston San Antonio Chicago Seattle San Francisco San Jose Memphis El Paso Milwaukee Charlotte Baltimore Portland Jacksonville Miami Buffalo Syracuse Pittsburgh Springfield Cincinnati Toledo Peoria Evansville Fort Wayne Grand Rapids Louisville Lexington Chattanooga Knoxville Norfolk Greensboro Winston-Salem Birmingham Mobile Savannah Orlando Tampa Columbus Kansas City Cedar Rapids Kansas City St Louis Springfield Shreveport Minneapolis New Orleans Omaha Tulsa Sioux Falls Fort Worth Lubbock Wichita Albuquerque Fort Collins Las Vegas Provo Tucson Spokane Eugene Bakersfield Fresno Oakland San Bernardino Cleveland Virginia Beach Reno Detroit Green Bay Amarillo Corpus Christi Pueblo Scranton Burlington Bangor Portland Asheville Wilmington Huntington Charleston Greenville Biloxi Meridian Fort Smith Sioux City Duluth Rapid City Fargo Grand Forks Roswell Casper Billings Missoula Butte Pocatello Flagstaff Yuma Macon MAINE VERMONT NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW YORK MASSACHUSETTS CONNECTICUT RI PENNSYLVANIA NEW JERSEY DEL MARYLAND VIRGINIA WEST VIRGINIA OHIO INDIANA ILLINOIS WISCONSIN KENTUCKY TENNESSEE NORTH CAROLINA SOUTH CAROLINA GEORGIA ALABAMA FLORIDA MISSISSIPPI LOUISIANA TEXAS ARKANSAS MISSOURI IOWA MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA NEBRASKA KANSAS OKLAHOMA NEW MEXICO COLORADO WYOMING MONTANA IDAHO UTAH ARIZONA NEVADA CALIFORNIA OREGON WASHINGTON DC M I C H I G A n B A HA M A S C U B A C A N A D A M E X I C O 85 90 95 80 75 125 120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 110 115 100 105 25 30 35 40 45 25 30 35 45 50 25 50 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 40 100 200 300 400 MILES 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 KILOMETERS 0 SCALE 1:7,500,000 Albers equal area projection, standard parallels 29 30'N and 45 30'N, central meridian 96 W o o o Produced in the Division of Realty, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Base Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey January 29, 2021 Nowitna KanuƟ Tetlin ArcƟc Alaska MariƟme Selawik Koyukuk Innoko Alaska Peninsula Kenai Yukon Delta Kodiak Yukon Flats A l as ka MariƟme Kodiak A la ska Mar iƟm e Alaska Peninsula A la sk a Ma ri Ɵ m e Alas ka MariƟ me Alas ka MariƟme I z e m b e k Alaska MariƟme A la ska Ma ri Ɵ m e Al aska Ma riƟm e Yukon Delta Innoko Togiak Alaska MariƟme Alaska MariƟme Alas ka MariƟme Alaska MariƟme Alas ka MariƟme A l a s k a M ar iƟ m e A l a s k a M ar iƟ m e A l as ka Mari Ɵm e Alaska MariƟme Ala ska Ma riƟm e A l a s k a M ar iƟ m e Alaska MariƟme Alaska MariƟme Alaska MariƟme Alaska MariƟme Becharof Teshekpuk Lake Kobuk R Noatak R Colville R Yukon River Yukon R R Tanana R Copper R Susitna R Iliamna Lake Becharof Lake R Lake Clark K o yu k u k R K us ko kw im P or cu pi n e ARCTIC CIRCLE B E R I N G S E A P A C I F I C O C E A N A R C T I C O C E A N G U L F O F A L A S K A C o ok In le t Br isto l B ay N or ton So un d K o tz ebu e S ou n d C H U K C H I S E A B E A U F O R T S E A B e r i n g S t r a i t C A N A D A R U S S I A Anchorage Fairbanks Ketchikan Sitka Valdez Bethel Nome Barrow Prudhoe Bay Unalaska Juneau Anchorage St. Lawrence Island St. Matthew Island Nunivak Island Pribilof Islands Unimak Island Shumagin Islands Kodiak Island Afognak Island Chichagof Island Baranof Island Prince of Wales Island Attu I Kiska Island Amchitka Island Adak Island Atka Island Umnak Island Unalaska Island Nelson Island A L E U T I A N I S L A N D S 140 135 145 150 155 160 165 170 175 W 180 140 135 130 125 120 115 145 150 155 160 165 170 175 W 175 E 170 165 160 155 150 145 180 175 E 170 165 60 55 65 70 65 60 50 55 45 70 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o SCALE 1:7,500,000 Albers equal area projection, standard parallels 55 N and 65 N, central meridian 154 W o o o ALASKA Hakalau Forest Kona Forest Unit Kilauea Point James Campbell Pearl Harbor Hanalei Keālia Pond Hulē‘ia Kakahai‘a O'ahu Forest P A C I F I C O C E A N 22 20 160 158 156 o o o o o Hilo HAWAI’I MAUI MOLOKA’I O’AHU KAUA’I NI’IHAU KAHO’OLAWE LĀNA’I Honolulu Principal Islands of HAWAII SCALE 1:7,500,000 Albers equal area projection, standard parallels 8 N and 18 N, central meridian 157 W o o o UK US 68 66 64 17 30' 18 30' o o o o o o o o Desecheo Green Cay Vieques Culebra Buck Island Laguna Cartagena Cabo Rojo Sandy Point San Juan Ponce A T L A N T I C O C E A N C A R I B B E A N S E A SCALE 1:7,500,000 Albers equal area projection, standard parallels 8 N and 18 N, central meridian 66 30'W Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands Honolulu American Samoa Guam Fairbanks Washington San Juan 4840 mi 7789 km 3032 mi 4880 km 3255 mi 5238 km 1557 mi 2506 km 3812 mi 6135 km 2599 mi 4183 km P A C IF IC O C E A N TROPIC OF CANCER EQUATOR 20 o 10 N o 0 o 10 S o 150 o 160 o 170 o E 180 o 170 o W 160 o 30 o A U ST R A L I A P A P U A N E W G U I N E A S O L O M O N I S L A N D S V AN UA T U T U V A L U WALLIS (FRANCE) FUTUNA (FRANCE) TOKELAU (NEW ZEALAND) COOK ISLANDS (NEW ZEALAND) SAMOA AMERICAN SAMOA KIRITIMATI (KIRIBATI) M A R S H A L L I S L A N D S NAURU FE DERA TED STATE S OF MICR ONESI A NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS (UNITED STATES) H A W A I I Honolulu TARAWA (KIRIBATI) See inset map of Hawaii below 200 400 MILES 0 300 600 KILOMETERS 0 PACIFIC ISLANDS SCALE 1:29,000,000 Albers equal area projection, standard parallels 7 S and 20 N, central meridian 174 30' E o o o Guam NWR Midway Atoll NWR Kingman Reef NWR and Paciﬁc Remote Islands MNM Palmyra Atoll NWR and Paciﬁc Remote Islands MNM Baker Island NWR and Paciﬁc Remote Islands MNM Rose Atoll NWR and Rose Atoll MNM Wake Atoll NWR and Paciﬁc Remote Islands MNM Papahānaumokuākea MNM Marianas Trench MNM (Island Unit) Howland Island NWR and Paciﬁc Remote Islands MNM Jarvis Island NWR and Paciﬁc Remote Islands MNM Johnston Atoll NWR and Paciﬁc Remote Islands MNM Mariana Arc of Fire NWR / Marianas Tren ch MNM (Vo lcanic Un it) H a wa iia n Is land s NW R Mariana Trench NWR / Marianas Trench MNM (Trench Unit) Northeast Canyons and Seamounts MNM SCALE 1:7,500,000 Same projection parameters as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands inset map Navassa Island JAMAICA HAITI Navassa Island 18 30' o 17 30' o 76 o 75 o 74 o C A RI BB EA N S E A Refuge units of less than 20,000 acres Refuge units of 20,000 acres or more Washita Red Rock Lakes Abbreviations CA: ConservaƟon Area MNM: Marine NaƟonal Monument* NFWR: NaƟonal Fish and Wildlife Refuge NWFR: NaƟonal Wildlife and Fish Refuge NWR: NaƟonal Wildlife Refuge WMA: Wildlife Management Area WMD: Wetland Management District Oﬃce** WPA: Waterfowl ProducƟon Area * Marine National Monuments are conservation areas established through the Antiquities Act, managed by the USFWS in cooperation with other federal, state, territorial and private partners. ** WMD oﬃces manage Waterfowl Production Areas which are not shown due to scale. Please visit http://gis.fws.gov/WPA_Mapper/ for an interactive map to view WPAs and Refuges in more detail. City State Capital Interior Regions Some refuges are represented as dots where easement acreage exceeds 20,000 acres. Refuges as shown may contain inholdings. States Download a copy at: www.fws.gov/refuges/maps/ Benton Lake WMD Bowdoin WMD Charles M. Russell WMD Oxford Slough WPA Northeast Montana WMD Crosby WMD Lostwood WMD Audubon WMD J. Clark Salyer WMD Chase Lake Prairie Project WMD Long Lake WMD Kulm WMD Devils Lake WMD Sand Lake WMD Leopold WMD Michigan WMD Morris WMD Arrowwood WMD Tamarac WMD Detroit Lakes WMD Fergus Falls WMD Waubay WMD Big Stone WMD Litchﬁeld WMD St. Croix WMD Minnesota Valley WMD Windom WMD Iowa WMD Madison WMD Huron WMD Lake Andes WMD Lacreek WMD Rainwater Basin WMD Tewaukon WMD Valley City WMD Carlton Pond WPA Northwest Montana WMD Coachella Valley Seal Beach EllicoƩ Slough Salinas River SuƩer Colusa Castle Rock Modoc Bandon Marsh Oregon Islands William L. Finley Ankeny BaskeƩ Slough Siletz Bay Three Arch Rocks Cape Meares Julia Butler Hansen Refuge for the Columbian White-Tailed Deer Pierce Franz Lake McKay Creek Cold Springs Conboy Lake Toppenish Deer Flat Deer Flat Grays Harbor Copalis FlaƩery Rocks Dungeness ProtecƟon Island Kootenai Swan River Camas Pahranagat Lee Metcalf Grass Lake Hailstone War Horse Benton Lake Black Coulee HewiƩ Lake North PlaƩe Bill Williams River San Bernardino Grulla Muleshoe Buﬀalo Lake Maxwell Las Vegas Two Ponds Lacreek Waubay Big Stone Lake Andes Desoto Boyer Chute Loess Bluﬀs Kirwin Marais des Cygnes Ozark Plateau OpƟma Washita Sequoyah Tishomingo Hagerman LiƩle River Santa Ana Mandalay Big Branch Marsh Grand Cote Shell Keys Black Bayou Lake Yazoo Morgan Brake Mathews Brake Dahomey Holla Bend Big Lake Wapanocca Swan Lake Clarence Cannon Neal Smith Union Slough DriŌless Area Minnesota Valley Rydell Hamden Slough Huron Harbor Island Fox River Chautauqua Emiquon Chautauqua Meredosia Shiawassee Cedar Point OƩawa Muscatatuck Hatchie Lake Isom Reelfoot Cross Creeks Grand Bay Mississippi Sandhill Crane Choctaw Watercress Darter Eufaula Fern Cave Sauta Cave Key Cave ACE Basin Pinckney Island Wassaw Harris Neck Blackbeard Island Banks Lake Egmont Key Island Bay Pine Island Caloosahatchee J. N. "Ding" Darling Matlacha Pass Archie Carr Pelican Island Lake Woodruﬀ Crystal River Crocodile Lake Pee Dee Cedar Island Mackay Island Back Bay Fisherman Island Eastern Shore of Virginia Chincoteague Chincoteague Plum Tree Island James River Presquile Rappahannock River Valley Occoquan Bay Elizabeth Hartwell Ohio River Islands Erie Iroquois Montezuma John Heinz NWR at Tinicum Supawana Meadows Eastern Neck Patuxent Research Refuge Prime Hook Great Swamp Stewart B. McKinney Oyster Bay Target Rock Elizabeth A. Morton AmaganseƩ Block Island Trustom Pond Sachuest Point Nantucket Monomoy Oxbow Great Meadows Wapack John Hay Thacher Island Great Bay Rachel Carson Sunkhaze Meadows Aroostook Oregon Islands Oregon Islands Merced Wertheim WhiƩlesey Creek Handy Brake Steigerwald Lake Lake Zahl Des Lacs Lake Ilo McLean Stewart Lake Tewaukon Audubon Lake Neƫe Chase Lake Arrowwood White Horse Hill Lake Alice Kellys Slough Slade Guadalupe- Nipomo Dunes Shawangunk Grasslands Silvio O. Conte NFWR Bear Valley Kirtlands Warbler WMA Ohio River Islands Horicon Upper Mississippi River NWFR Port Louisa Two Rivers D'Arbonne Bayou Cocodrie Bayou Sauvage Cameron Prairie Texas Point Big Boggy Lower Rio Grande Valley Quivira Dakota Grassland CA Fort Niobrara Sand Lake Bowdoin Lake Mason Pathﬁnder Browns Park Rocky Mountain Arsenal Alamosa Monte Vista BiƩer Lake Ouray Fish Springs Willapa O re gon Isl an d s Upper Klamath Fallon San Luis Cibola HuƩon Lake Minidoka Grays Lake Sacramento River Cokeville Meadows Ash Meadows Lake Ophelia Atchafalaya Mingo Cypress Creek Swanquarter Silvio O. Conte NFWR Silvio O. Conte NFWR Long Lake Logan Cave AnƟoch Dunes Blue Ridge BuƩe Sink WMA Farallon Islands Hopper Mountain Marin Islands Pinellas Passage Key St. Johns Wolf Island Bond Swamp Cat Island Susquehanna Nomans Land Island Mashpee Massasoit Michigan Islands Mille Lacs Northern Tallgrass Prairie Coldwater River Pilot Knob Ozark Caveﬁsh Nine-Pipe Lamesteer Pablo Creedman Coulee Lake Thibadeau John W. and Louise Seier Karl E. Mundt Moapa Valley Anaho Island Seatuck Conscience Point White Lake PreƩy Rock Lake Patricia Sunburst Lake Springwater Appert Lake Maple River Dakota Lake Bone Hill Storm Lake Wild Rice Lake Stoney Slough Lost Lake Canﬁeld Lake Florence Lake Hutchinson Lake Lake George Half-Way Lake Tomahawk Hobart Lake Shell Lake Hiddenwood Wintering River Lake OƟs Willow Lake Lords Lake Pleasant Lake Buﬀalo Lake CoƩonwood Lake Camp Lake Rabb Lake School SecƟon Lake Sheyenne Lake Johnson Lake Sibley Lake Silver Lake Rose Lake Stump Lake Rock Lake Brumba Snyder Lake Ardoch Lambs Lake LiƩle Goose Tybee Bear BuƩe Caddo Lake LiƩle Sandy Moody Wallops Island Featherstone Nansemond Quillayute Needles Green Bay Gravel Island Mortenson Lake Bamforth Steve Thompson North Central Valley WMA Bayou Teche Assabet River Colorado River WMA Dakota Tallgrass Prairie WMA Blackfoot Valley CA Wood Lake West Sister Island BiƩer Creek MarƟn Northern Tallgrass Prairie Ohio River Islands Baca Mountain Longleaf Holt Collier Theodore Roosevelt Ernest F. Hollings San Juan Islands McNary Rice Lake Michigan Islands Port Louisa Glacial Ridge Red River Red River Colorado River WMA Colorado River WMA Rocky Flats Kirtlands Warbler WMA Deer Flat Mason Neck Oregon Islands Great River Great River Everglades Headwaters NWR and CA Flint Hills Lake Wales Ridge Ohio River Islands North Dakota WMA Sangre de Cristo CA Swan Valley CA Hackmatack Rio Mora NWR and CA Lost Trail Beltrami WMA Cahaba River Dakota Grassland CA Big Muddy NFWR Great Thicket Hart Mountain NaƟonal Antelope Range Tamarac Kofa Necedah Great White Heron Red Rock Lakes Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge Bear River Watershed CA Lower Suwannee San Bernard Upper Ouachita Crab Orchard Carolina Sandhills Edwin B. Forsythe Anahuac SƟllwater San Joaquin River Don Edwards- San Francisco Bay Pond Creek C ac he Rive r Blackwater Big Oaks Chickasaw St. Catherine Creek San Diego Bay San Diego Tijuana Slough Pixley Delevan Humboldt Bay Ridgeﬁeld McNary Billy Frank Jr. Nisqually Leslie Canyon Deep Fork Catahoula Lower Hatchie Crane Meadows Detroit River InternaƟonal Wildlife Refuge Cedar Keys Hobe Sound Santee Currituck Bombay Hook Cape May Ninigret Parker River Pond Island Franklin Island PeƟt Manan Cross Island Clarks River Umbagog Moosehorn Patoka River Trinity River AƩwater Prairie Chicken Seedskadee Bear Lake Turnbull Kern Stone Lakes San Pablo Bay Sacramento Balcones Canyonlands Red River NaƟonal Key Deer Canaan Valley Silvio O. Conte NFWR Seal Island TualaƟn River Waccamaw Dakota Tallgrass Prairie WMA Rocky Mountain Front CA Red River PeƟt Manan Tulare Basin WMA Cherry Valley Nestucca Bay Willow Creek-Lurline WMA Laguna Atascosa Lower Rio Grande Valley Neches River Agassiz Michigan Islands Bon Secour Flint Hills Legacy CA Northern Tallgrass Prairie Missisquoi Wallkill River John H. Chafee Great Dismal Swamp Trempealeau Middle Mississippi River Necedah WMA Wapato Lake Kankakee NWR and CA LiƩle Pend Oreille Charles M. Russell UL Bend Lewis and Clark Columbia UmaƟlla Malheur Aransas Buenos Aires San Andres Klamath Marsh Lower Klamath Tule Lake Clear Lake J. Clark Salyer Upper Souris Lostwood Sonny Bono Salton Sea Key West Arthur R. Marshall- Loxahatchee Seney Cabeza Prieta Sevilleta Bosque del Apache Medicine Lake Ruby Lake Crescent Lake ValenƟne Sherburne NaƟonal Elk Refuge Desert Lacassine Sabine McFaddin Bogue ChiƩo Okefenokee St. Marks Chassahowitzka MerriƩ Island Delta Wichita Mountains Dale Bumpers White River Felsenthal Panther Swamp Tensas River Sam D. Hamilton Noxubee Salt Plains Tennessee Alligator River Pocosin Lakes MaƩamuskeet Wheeler Cape Romain Piedmont Savannah Arapaho Brazoria Upper Mississippi River NWFR B r e to n Hillside Overﬂow Tallahatchie Bald Knob St. Vincent Pea Island Sheldon R o a n ok e R i v e r Havasu Imperial Florida Panther Ten Thousand Islands Saddle Mountain Grasslands WMA Valle de Oro Regional Office ALASKA 10 Interstate Freeway National Capital Marine National Monuments Wetland Management District Offices Fergus Falls WMD Waterfowl Production Areas Carlton Pond WPA Mountain Bogs -66° -66° -67° -67° -68° -68° -69° -69° -70° -70° -71° -71° 42° 42° 41° 41° 40° 40° 39° 39° Northeast Canyons and Seamounts MNM Northeast Canyons and Seamounts MNM PA C I F I C O C E A N AT L A N T I C O C E A N SCALE 1:10,000,000 SCALE 1:10,000,000 When President Theodore Roosevelt made Florida's tiny Pelican Island a refuge for birds in 1903, he wrote the first chapter of a great American conservation success story. Entering its second century, the National Wildlife Refuge System comprises 150 million acres, protected within more than 567 Refuges and thousands of small prairie wetlands that serve as waterfowl breeding and nesting areas. There are wildlife refuges in every state, and at least one within an hour's drive of every major American city, providing refuge for people as well as wildlife. National Wildlife Refuges are far more than havens for wild plants and animals. In fact, visitors–more than 40 million each year–are welcome on 98 percent of wildlife refuges, where they are encouraged to take part in outdoor pursuits designated by law as priority activities offered by the National Wildlife Refuge System. From environmental education and interpretation to hunting and fishing to photography and wildlife watching, refuges offer visitors a truly natural and wild outdoor experience, teaching millions the importance of taking care of our natural resources. This map shows lands and waters managed in the National Wildlife Refuge System. Private holdings exist within some of these boundaries. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service is a Federal Agency whose mission, working with others, is to conserve fish and wildlife and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge System Green River Great Lakes 3 South Atlantic-Gulf 2 Mississippi Basin 4 North Atlantic- Appalachian 1 Arkansas- Rio Grande- Texas-Gulf 6 Missouri Basin 5 Lower Colorado Basin 8 California- Great Basin 10 Columbia-Pacific Northwest 9 Upper Colorado Basin 7 Alaska 11 Site Location National Wild and Scenic Rivers System Established by Congress under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System was created to preserve the free flow, water quality, and outstanding natural, cultural, and recreational values of select rivers for the enjoyment of present and future generations. The Act is notable for safeguarding the special character of these rivers, while also recognizing the potential for their appropriate use and development. It encourages river management that crosses political boundaries and promotes public participation in developing goals for river protection. For more information about the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System or specific designated rivers, visit the lnteragency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordinating CounciI’s website, www.rivers.gov, or contact one of the federal river-administering agencies: • US Forest Service www.fs.usda.gov • National Park Service www.nps.gov • Bureau of Land Management www.blm.gov • US Fish and Wildlife Service www.fws.gov National Wild and Scenic Rivers System U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Fish and Wildlife Service National Park Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service …the time has also come to identify and preserve free-flowing stretches of our great rivers before growth and development make the beauty of the unspoiled waterway a memory. —President Lyndon B. Johnson, 1965 Site Location Site Location Ramey Air Force Base Sabana Seca US Naval Radio Station Fort Buchanan Caribbean National Forest Virgin Islands National Park Culebra NWR Virgin Islands Coral Reef NM Roosevelt Roads Naval Reservation Buck Island NWR Vieques NWR Camp Santiago Fort Allen Naval Radio Station Laguna Cartagena NWR Cabo Rojo NWR Buck Island Reef National Monument Sandy Point NWR Virgin Islands Coral Reef NM Virgin Islands National Park The National Atlas of the United States of America U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey PUERTO RICO AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Where We Are nationalatlas.gov TM RO pagefed_pr5.pdf INTERIOR-GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, RESTON, VIRGINIA-2003 FEDERAL LANDS AND INDIAN RESERVATIONS Department of Defense (includes Army Corps of Engineers lakes) Fish and Wildlife Service / Wilderness Forest Service / Wilderness National Park Service / Wilderness NM NWR National Monument National Wildlife Refuge Abbreviations Some small sites are not shown, especially in urban areas. MILES 0 20 30 50 10 40 Albers equal area projection San Juan Charlotte Amalie Mayaguez Arecibo Caguas Ponce Bayamon Carolina A T L A N T I C O C E A N C A R I B B E A N S E A Site Location Site Location Site Location Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Agave eggersiana Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Site Location Agave eggersiana Site Location Site Location