Matta v. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS et al
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX STEVEN ENRIQUE MATTA, II, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 2011-0091 ) GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, ) USTON CORNELIUS, DONNELL SAMUEL, ) SAMUEL ABRAHAM, NYIEM FRANCE, ) ANTHONY HECTOR and EMANUEL ) TURNER, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Attorneys: Kye Walker, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Plaintiff Erika Marie Scott, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Defendants ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant Samuel Abraham’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 106), Plaintiff’s Opposition thereto (Dkt. No. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_11-cv-00091/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_11-cv-00091-2.pdf
SHA-256 cdd6cdba79c8100ef1f57deda0b146105f0c448df2f81c41aceaa32312dfe23e
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-cdd6cdba79c8
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX STEVEN ENRIQUE MATTA, II, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 2011-0091 ) GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, ) USTON CORNELIUS, DONNELL SAMUEL, ) SAMUEL ABRAHAM, NYIEM FRANCE, ) ANTHONY HECTOR and EMANUEL ) TURNER, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Attorneys: Kye Walker, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Plaintiff Erika Marie Scott, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Defendants ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant Samuel Abraham’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 106), Plaintiff’s Opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 127), the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Samuel Abraham’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant Samuel Abraham’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that all claims against Defendant Samuel Abraham in his individual capacity are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and it is further Case: 1:11-cv-00091-WAL-GWC Document #: 134 Filed: 01/08/16 Page 1 of 2 2 ORDERED that Defendant Samuel Abraham’s motion to dismiss with prejudice is DEINED. SO ORDERED. Date: January 8, 2016 _______/s/________ WILMA A. LEWIS Chief Judge Case: 1:11-cv-00091-WAL-GWC Document #: 134 Filed: 01/08/16 Page 2 of 2