Genevieve Whitaker v. Caroline F. Fawkes etal
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX GENEVIEVE R. WHITAKER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 2016-0033 ) CAROLINE F. FAWKES, ARTURO R. ) WATLINGTON, JR., ALECIA M. WELLS, ) LYDIA A. HENDRICKS, LAWRENCE T. ) BOSCHULTE, LILLIANA BELARDO ) De O’NEAL, LISA HARRIS-MOORHEAD, ) RAYMOND J. WILLIAMS, RUPERT ) W.B. ROSS, JR., and HARRY A. DANIEL, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Appearances: Genevieve Whitaker, Pro Se St. Croix, U.S.V.I. Julita K. De Leon, Esq., St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Lewis, District Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court on the “Motion for Default Judgment” (Dkt. No. 29) filed by Plaintiff Genevieve Whitaker (“Plaintiff”). In her Motion, Plaintiff seeks a default judgment against all Defendants in light of their failure to Answer the Amended Complaint after this Court denied Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_16-cv-00033/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_16-cv-00033-1.pdf
SHA-256 d4950538f091c053785114f0800b7fa35b510e5f9251f548ea78ffa3e408f098
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-d4950538f091
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX GENEVIEVE R. WHITAKER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 2016-0033 ) CAROLINE F. FAWKES, ARTURO R. ) WATLINGTON, JR., ALECIA M. WELLS, ) LYDIA A. HENDRICKS, LAWRENCE T. ) BOSCHULTE, LILLIANA BELARDO ) De O’NEAL, LISA HARRIS-MOORHEAD, ) RAYMOND J. WILLIAMS, RUPERT ) W.B. ROSS, JR., and HARRY A. DANIEL, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Appearances: Genevieve Whitaker, Pro Se St. Croix, U.S.V.I. Julita K. De Leon, Esq., St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Lewis, District Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court on the “Motion for Default Judgment” (Dkt. No. 29) filed by Plaintiff Genevieve Whitaker (“Plaintiff”). In her Motion, Plaintiff seeks a default judgment against all Defendants in light of their failure to Answer the Amended Complaint after this Court denied Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). This Court denied Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in an Order entered on April 6, 2021. (Dkt. No. 26). Defendants were directed by separate Order to file Answers to the Amended Complaint on or before April 20, 2021. (Dkt. No. 28). To date, none of the Defendants have filed answers. Case: 1:16-cv-00033-RAM-EAH Document #: 30 Filed: 09/03/21 Page 1 of 2 2 Plaintiff filed the instant Motion seeking entry of a default judgment pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 55(b). (Dkt. No. 29 at 2). To be entitled to default judgment, the moving party must present evidence, by affidavits and/or documents, of the following: (1) that default was entered; (2) that the defendant has not appeared; (3) that the defendant is not an infant or incompetent [person]; (4) that all pleadings were validly served upon the defendant; (5) the amount of judgment and how it was calculated; and (6) an affidavit of non-military service. Prestige Prop. Mgmt., LLC v. DEL Enterprise, LLC, No. 3:2019-003, 2020 WL 714111, at *2 (D.V.I. Feb. 12, 2020). Once this evidence is presented, it is within the discretion of the Court to determine whether a default judgment should be entered. See Pieczenik v. Comm’r New Jersey Dept. of Envir. Protection, 715 F. App’x 205, 208-09 (3d Cir. 2017); Catanzaro v. Fischer, 570 F. App’x 162, 165 (3d Cir. 2014). In this case, Plaintiff has failed to establish that the Clerk has entered a default as mandated by FED. R. CIV. P. 55(a). Plaintiff has also failed to establish the other requirements for default judgment. See Oelsner v. Maduro, No. 3:2014-cv-062, 2021 WL 320831, at *3 (D.V.I. Feb. 1, 2021). Because of Plaintiff’s failure to comply with FED. R. CIV. P. 55(a) and the other prerequisites for default judgment, the Motion for Default Judgment will be denied without prejudice. UPON CONSIDERATION of the foregoing, Plaintiff’s “Motion for Default Judgment” (Dkt. No. 29) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED. Date: September 3, 2021 ________/s/________ WILMA A. LEWIS District Judge Case: 1:16-cv-00033-RAM-EAH Document #: 30 Filed: 09/03/21 Page 2 of 2