VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

USA v. De Miranda

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Date
2009-01-22
Pages
3
Text
Native Text

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SIDNEI LUCAS De MIRANDA, Defendant. ___________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2008-20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Ishmael A. Meyers, Jr., AUSA St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. for the plaintiff, Jesse A. Gessin, AFPD St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. for the defendant. SENTENCING MEMORANDUM OPINION GÓMEZ, C.J. The defendant, Sidnei Lucas De Miranda (“De Miranda”), was indicted on May 2, 2008, for re-entering the United States, after having been removed, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Following a two day trial, a jury convicted De Miranda. On January 9, 2009, the Court held a sentencing hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court sentenced De Miranda to a term of time served. This opinion outlines the factors considered by the Court when it imposed that sentence. Case: 3:08-cr-00020-CVG-GWB Document #: 51 Filed: 01/22/09 Page 1 of 3 United States v. De Miranda Criminal No. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_08-cr-00020/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_08-cr-00020-1.pdf

SHA-256 d920863fc7e5e86d949d90df4b39124e74a2ca354feb399729832268a2df58a4

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-d920863fc7e5

Document text

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SIDNEI LUCAS De MIRANDA, Defendant. ___________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2008-20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Ishmael A. Meyers, Jr., AUSA St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. for the plaintiff, Jesse A. Gessin, AFPD St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. for the defendant. SENTENCING MEMORANDUM OPINION GÓMEZ, C.J. The defendant, Sidnei Lucas De Miranda (“De Miranda”), was indicted on May 2, 2008, for re-entering the United States, after having been removed, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Following a two day trial, a jury convicted De Miranda. On January 9, 2009, the Court held a sentencing hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court sentenced De Miranda to a term of time served. This opinion outlines the factors considered by the Court when it imposed that sentence. Case: 3:08-cr-00020-CVG-GWB Document #: 51 Filed: 01/22/09 Page 1 of 3 United States v. De Miranda Criminal No. 2008-20 Sentencing Memorandum Opinion In addition to the United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual, and the relevant statutes, the Court is required to give “meaningful consideration” to the factors set out in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (“Section 3553(a)”). United States v. Cooper, 437 F.3d 324, 329 (3d Cir. 2006). Section 3553(a), in pertinent part, provides: The court shall impose a sentence sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes set forth in paragraph (2) of this subsection. The court, in determining the particular sentence to be imposed, shall consider– (1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant; (2) the need for the sentence imposed– (A) to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense; (B) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct; (C) to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and (D) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective manner; (3) the kinds of sentences available; (4) the kinds of sentence and the sentencing range established . . . . 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The crime of which De Miranda was convicted is a serious offense. Considering the Section 3553(a) factors, the Court imposed a sentence that would promote respect for the law and Case: 3:08-cr-00020-CVG-GWB Document #: 51 Filed: 01/22/09 Page 2 of 3 United States v. De Miranda Criminal No. 08-20 Sentencing Memorandum Opinion deter such criminal conduct. Additionally, the sentence imposed effects parity with similarly situated defendants. S\ CURTIS V. GÓMEZ Chief Judge Case: 3:08-cr-00020-CVG-GWB Document #: 51 Filed: 01/22/09 Page 3 of 3