USA v. ILES
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ) PEOPLE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, ) ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 2014-0051 ) ) KETISHA ISLES, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) Attorneys: Rhonda Williams-Henry, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Government Jomo Meade, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Defendant ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant’s “Motion for Judgment of Acquittal or, in the Alternative, Motion for a New Trial” (Dkt. No. 64); the Government’s Opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 72); Defendant’s Reply (Dkt No. 74); the entire record herein; and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s “Motion for Judgment of Acquittal or, in the Alternative, Motion for a New Trial” is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Date: August 19, 2016 ________/s/_________ RAYMOND L. FINCH Senior District Judge Case: 1:14-cr-00051-WAL-GWC Document #: 86 Filed: 08/19/16 Page 1 of 1
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_14-cr-00051/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_14-cr-00051-1.pdf
SHA-256 da7fe30d1b092f9c679e9df6fff3ac383353a062bf1b36a6d07be3a6c7e955ad
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-da7fe30d1b09
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ) PEOPLE OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, ) ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 2014-0051 ) ) KETISHA ISLES, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) Attorneys: Rhonda Williams-Henry, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Government Jomo Meade, Esq., St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For Defendant ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant’s “Motion for Judgment of Acquittal or, in the Alternative, Motion for a New Trial” (Dkt. No. 64); the Government’s Opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 72); Defendant’s Reply (Dkt No. 74); the entire record herein; and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s “Motion for Judgment of Acquittal or, in the Alternative, Motion for a New Trial” is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Date: August 19, 2016 ________/s/_________ RAYMOND L. FINCH Senior District Judge Case: 1:14-cr-00051-WAL-GWC Document #: 86 Filed: 08/19/16 Page 1 of 1