DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 MICHELINE HENRY individually, 5 and as mother and next of [sic] friend, 5 of ANNIESHA MONDESIR, 5 5 Plaintiffs, 5 2004-CV-0096 v. 5 5 KMART CORPORATION, 5 5 Defendant. 5 ____________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Wilfredo A. Geigel, Esq. ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Settlement as to Travel Expenses (Docket No. 101). Defendant filed an opposition to said motion, and Plaintiff filed a reply thereto. Plaintiff claims that “Defendant continues to refuse to pay the agreed $874.58 to Plaintiff Henry.” Motion at 1-2. Defendant counters that the amount was paid. In her reply, Plaintiff acknowledges receipt of the check and, in fact, provided a copy of the check as an attachment. Because the amounts due have been paid, the Court finds the issue moot. Case: 1:04-cv-00096-RLF-GWC Document #: 104 Filed: 01/06/09 Page 1 of 2 Henry v. Kmart Corp. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_04-cv-00096/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_04-cv-00096-2.pdf
SHA-256 db9cca620baf589884a3ae58c61199652dbd378cf3c2b4fbfc3d94ae7a59d51d
Re-using this document
A work of the United States Government. Not subject to copyright in the United States under 17 U.S.C. § 105, and therefore in the public domain from the moment it was created.
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-db9cca620baf
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 MICHELINE HENRY individually, 5 and as mother and next of [sic] friend, 5 of ANNIESHA MONDESIR, 5 5 Plaintiffs, 5 2004-CV-0096 v. 5 5 KMART CORPORATION, 5 5 Defendant. 5 ____________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Wilfredo A. Geigel, Esq. ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Settlement as to Travel Expenses (Docket No. 101). Defendant filed an opposition to said motion, and Plaintiff filed a reply thereto. Plaintiff claims that “Defendant continues to refuse to pay the agreed $874.58 to Plaintiff Henry.” Motion at 1-2. Defendant counters that the amount was paid. In her reply, Plaintiff acknowledges receipt of the check and, in fact, provided a copy of the check as an attachment. Because the amounts due have been paid, the Court finds the issue moot. Case: 1:04-cv-00096-RLF-GWC Document #: 104 Filed: 01/06/09 Page 1 of 2 Henry v. Kmart Corp. 2004-CV-0096 Order Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Settlement as to Travel Expenses (Docket No. 101) is DENIED AS MOOT. ENTER: Dated: January 6, 2009 /s/ GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:04-cv-00096-RLF-GWC Document #: 104 Filed: 01/06/09 Page 2 of 2