Bennington Foods, L.L.C. Dba Bennington Group v. St. Croix Renaissance Group L.L.P.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 BENNINGTON FOODS, LLC, d/b/a 5 BENNINGTON GROUP, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2006-CV-0154 v. 5 5 ST. CROIX RENAISSANCE GROUP, LLLP, 5 a U.S. Virgin Islands corporation, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Joel H. Holt, Esq. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION THIS MATTER came before the Court for consideration upon Defendant’s Motion For Clarification (Docket No. 234). This order is issued without necessity of response. Having reviewed the Memorandum in Support of Motion For Clarification, the Court understands the confusion in the interpretation of its Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Compel (Docket No. 215), entered January 21, 2009. It was the Court’s intent, with regard to Request No. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_06-cv-00154/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_06-cv-00154-5.pdf
SHA-256 dbb47ffc9cb09f3efd7069ba3af2b9eb7dfd593515542d5154e91894212713cd
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-dbb47ffc9cb0
Document text
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 BENNINGTON FOODS, LLC, d/b/a 5 BENNINGTON GROUP, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2006-CV-0154 v. 5 5 ST. CROIX RENAISSANCE GROUP, LLLP, 5 a U.S. Virgin Islands corporation, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Joel H. Holt, Esq. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION THIS MATTER came before the Court for consideration upon Defendant’s Motion For Clarification (Docket No. 234). This order is issued without necessity of response. Having reviewed the Memorandum in Support of Motion For Clarification, the Court understands the confusion in the interpretation of its Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Compel (Docket No. 215), entered January 21, 2009. It was the Court’s intent, with regard to Request No. 10, to restrict price information to the actual or potential sale of scrap metal located, originating in, or otherwise situated in the Caribbean region, without regard to where the buyer(s)/potential buyer(s)/other party(ies) were located or to where such scrap metal was being sold or potentially sold. WHEREFORE, it is now hereby ORDERED: 1. Defendant’s Motion For Clarification (Docket No. 234) is GRANTED. Case: 1:06-cv-00154-HB Document #: 236 Filed: 02/17/09 Page 1 of 2 Bennington Foods, LLC. v. St. Croix Renaissance Group, LLLLP and Montrose Global Assets, Inc. 2006-CV-0154 Order Granting Defendant’s Motion For Clarification 2. The Court’s Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Compel (Docket No. 215), entered January 21, 2009, is clarified with regard to Request No. 10, as explained more fully hereinabove, to wit: Plaintiff shall produce copies of all agreements, contracts, letters, telefaxes, emails, or other documents of any kind whatsoever you have exchanged with any other party regarding the actual or potential sale of scrap metal located, originating, or otherwise situated in the Caribbean region, from any source other than the St. Croix Renaissance site, between January 1, 2006, and December 21, 2006. ENTER: DATED: February 17, 2009 /s/ George W. Cannon, Jr. GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:06-cv-00154-HB Document #: 236 Filed: 02/17/09 Page 2 of 2