VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

USA v. Cook

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Date
2019-02-05
Pages
3
Text
Native Text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RUDY COOK, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2019-02 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Gretchen Shappert, United States Attorney Everard E. Potter, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the United States of America, Omodare Jupiter, FPD Gabriel J. Villegas, AFPD Office of the Federal Public Defender St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For Rudy Cook. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the application of Rudy Cook (“Cook”) to waive his speedy trial. For the reasons stated herein, the time to try this case is extended up to and including April 30, 2019. Case: 3:19-cr-00002-CVG-RM Document #: 16 Filed: 02/05/19 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Diaz-Diaz Criminal No. 2018-24 Order While the Speedy Trial Act requires that defendants be tried within seventy days of indictment, the Court specifically finds that extending this period would be in the best interest of justice for several reasons. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_19-cr-00002/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_19-cr-00002-0.pdf

SHA-256 dddda3d2b9c0ed1d1794130f32b9d4d5b138deee9520e85f8a55d3b8467c388f

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-dddda3d2b9c0

Document text

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RUDY COOK, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2019-02 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Gretchen Shappert, United States Attorney Everard E. Potter, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the United States of America, Omodare Jupiter, FPD Gabriel J. Villegas, AFPD Office of the Federal Public Defender St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For Rudy Cook. ORDER GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the application of Rudy Cook (“Cook”) to waive his speedy trial. For the reasons stated herein, the time to try this case is extended up to and including April 30, 2019. Case: 3:19-cr-00002-CVG-RM Document #: 16 Filed: 02/05/19 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Diaz-Diaz Criminal No. 2018-24 Order While the Speedy Trial Act requires that defendants be tried within seventy days of indictment, the Court specifically finds that extending this period would be in the best interest of justice for several reasons. First, an extension is necessary to allow Cook time to investigate the case and review discovery. Second, Cook made his request with the advice and consent of counsel. Third, without an extension, Cook would be denied reasonable time necessary to explore plea options and prepare for trial. Consistent with these concerns, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has recognized that “whether or not a case is ‘unusual’ or ‘complex,’ an ‘ends of justice’ continuance may in appropriate circumstances be granted.” United States v. Fields, 39 F.3d 439, 444 (3d Cir. 1994); United States v. Dota, 33 F.3d 1179(9th Cir. 1994) (“An ends of justice continuance may be justified on grounds that one side needs more time to prepare for trial [even if the] case [i]s not ‘complex.’”); see also United States v. Lattany, 982 F.2d 866, 883 (3d Cir. 1992) (“[T]he district court did not abuse its discretion when it delayed the trial to give counsel . . . opportunity to . . . decid[e] upon and prepar[e] an appropriate defense.”); United States v. Brooks, 697 F.2d 517, 522 (3d Cir. 1982) (holding there was no abuse of discretion where district Case: 3:19-cr-00002-CVG-RM Document #: 16 Filed: 02/05/19 Page 2 of 3 United States v. Diaz-Diaz Criminal No. 2018-24 Order court found that multiple count, multiple defendant “case was complex and required additional time for adequate preparation.”). The premises considered; it is hereby ORDERED that the time beginning from the date of this order granting an extension through April 30, 2019, shall be excluded in computing the time within which the trial for Rudy Cook must be initiated pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161. S\ Curtis V. Gómez District Judge Case: 3:19-cr-00002-CVG-RM Document #: 16 Filed: 02/05/19 Page 3 of 3