VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

Divine Destinations, LLC v. Bruce W. Shortz et al, ST-2013-SM-207 (V.I. 2013) [unpublished]

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
superior.vicourts.org
Kind
Court Record
Date
2013-04-16
Pages
2
Text
OCR Text

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN DIVINE DESTINATIONS, LLC, SMALL CLAIMS NO. ST-13-SM-207 Plaintiff, ACTION FOR DEBT VS. BRUCE W. SHORTZ and MARIE ANICK O’MEARA, Defendants. Nmane Nm Ne Ne Nee eee ee ee e” MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants’ undated Motion for Continuance.! In the Motion, the Defendants request a continuance in this matter, which is currently set for trial on Wednesday, April 17, 2013, because (1) the service of process was improper, (2) even if the service of process was proper, they have not been given sufficient time to answer the Complaint, and (3) even if the Defendants have had enough time to answer, the Defendants are off-island and unable to appear until the end of May 2013, when they are scheduled to return to the island. The motion will be granted. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://superior.vicourts.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_12810747/File/Opinions/Archive/Divine%20Destinations%20v.%20Shortz%20(ADS).pdf

SHA-256 e765dd5b2e7941d9015d956a656f143fa8cf115bf5f6059d819331cb1012c5d6

Re-using this document

edicts of government — judicial opinions are not copyrightable by anyone. NOT 17 USC 105 (territorial court, not federal) and NOT 'rights unstated'.

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-e765dd5b2e79

Document text

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN DIVINE DESTINATIONS, LLC, SMALL CLAIMS NO. ST-13-SM-207 Plaintiff, ACTION FOR DEBT VS. BRUCE W. SHORTZ and MARIE ANICK O’MEARA, Defendants. Nmane Nm Ne Ne Nee eee ee ee e” MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants’ undated Motion for Continuance.! In the Motion, the Defendants request a continuance in this matter, which is currently set for trial on Wednesday, April 17, 2013, because (1) the service of process was improper, (2) even if the service of process was proper, they have not been given sufficient time to answer the Complaint, and (3) even if the Defendants have had enough time to answer, the Defendants are off-island and unable to appear until the end of May 2013, when they are scheduled to return to the island. The motion will be granted. Service of process issues in the Virgin Islands are governed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which states that service is effective if the manner in which the process is served follows the law of the state or territory where the action is brought.’ In the Virgin Islands, service is effective when the summons and complaint are deposited at the post office and the Defendant submits a “written admission” that he or she received the summons and complaint.’ In this matter, the Defendants’ present motion is a “written submission” stating that both parties received the summons and complaint. Therefore, service is effective on the Defendants. Issues related to the time and date set for trial in the Small Claims Court of the Virgin Islands are governed by Superior Court Rule 63, which states that “[t]he return-day, which shall ! This Motion has been received by the Court, but has not been filed. ? Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). 3W.1. Code Ann. tit. 5 § 114(a) (1921). Divine Destinations, LLC vs. Shortz and O’Meara ST-13-SM-207 Memorandum Opinion and Order be stated in the summons, shall not be less than 5, nor more than 15 days from the date of filing the action....”* The Rule further states that “[t]he trial shall be held on the return-day, unless for good cause shown....”° In this matter, the return-day is twelve (12) days from the date of filing the action, which clearly fits within the parameters in Superior Court Rule 63. Lastly, as previously stated, a trial date in Small Claims Court may be continued for good cause shown.° Here, the Defendants state that they are in New Mexico and unable to appear on the date of trial. They are set to return at the end of May. The Court finds that the Defendants’ long absence from the territory, as well as their scheduled return, constitute good cause under the Rule. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that this matter is RESCHEDULED for Tuesday, June 4, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom No. 3 of the Superior Court, Magistrate Division, Barbel Plaza South, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands; and it is further ORDERED that copies of this Memorandum Opinion and Order shall be directed to the parties herein. ee Dated: April /Z, 2013 Mey fore ALAND. SMITH Magistrate of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands _ ATTEST: VENETIA H. VELAZQUEZ, ESQ. _, Clerk of t HY XCINTH M. LOCKHART Senigr Deputy Clerk Y 198! Fa/4 By: ,—?> 4 Super Ct. R. 63(a). ° Super Ct. R. 63(b). ° Id.