Guerrier-Medina v. Yajak Development Corp. d/b/a JPK Development et al
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN SANTOS GUERRIER-MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. YAJAK DEVELOPMENT CORP. d/b/a JPK DEVELOPMENT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:20-cv-0008 ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. The initial docketing event in this case was a Motion for Refund filed Defendant Yajak Development Corp. (“Defendant”) on February 4, 2022. In that motion, Defendant, through counsel, asserts that it started to file a Notice of Removal on January 28, 2020, to remove this case from the Superior Court but “decided to stop the filing process before any document was filed.” However, before Defendant discontinued the filing process, Defendant paid the $400.00 new case filing fee. Defendant requested a refund of the $400.00 filing fee since the time for filing a Notice of Removal has passed and Defendant has decided not to remove the matter to the District Court. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_20-cv-00008/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_20-cv-00008-0.pdf
SHA-256 e827e96a0895d0f0e144c8fbbb10f17244060ab03a4f1d7e43748ad9fbbe4eba
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-e827e96a0895
Document text
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN SANTOS GUERRIER-MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. YAJAK DEVELOPMENT CORP. d/b/a JPK DEVELOPMENT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:20-cv-0008 ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. The initial docketing event in this case was a Motion for Refund filed Defendant Yajak Development Corp. (“Defendant”) on February 4, 2022. In that motion, Defendant, through counsel, asserts that it started to file a Notice of Removal on January 28, 2020, to remove this case from the Superior Court but “decided to stop the filing process before any document was filed.” However, before Defendant discontinued the filing process, Defendant paid the $400.00 new case filing fee. Defendant requested a refund of the $400.00 filing fee since the time for filing a Notice of Removal has passed and Defendant has decided not to remove the matter to the District Court. On February 5, 2020, the Magistrate Judge issued an Order granting the motion for refund and directing the Clerk of Court to issue a refund to Defendant. There have been no further filings in this case. Accordingly, after careful consideration and review, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk’s Office SHALL administratively CLOSE this case; it is further ORDERED that a copy of the Order shall be served on counsel for Defendant. Dated: October 12, 2022 /s/ Robert A. Molloy _________ ROBERT A. MOLLOY Chief Judge Case: 3:20-cv-00008-RAM-RM Document #: 3 Filed: 10/12/22 Page 1 of 1