USA v. Petersen
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CRIMINAL NO. 2008-0022 v. ) ) KENDALL PETERSEN, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________ ) ORDER FINCH, SENIOR JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress and Motion for a Franks Hearing filed on December 19, 2008. An evidentiary hearing was held on January 29, 2009. After consideration and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress and Motion for a Franks Hearing is DENIED. ENTERED this 3rd day of February, 2009. _________________/s/_____________________ HONORABLE RAYMOND L. FINCH SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 1:08-cr-00022-WAL-GWC Document #: 37 Filed: 02/03/09 Page 1 of 2 2 Case: 1:08-cr-00022-WAL-GWC Document #: 37 Filed: 02/03/09 Page 2 of 2
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cr-00022/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cr-00022-1.pdf
SHA-256 e8b039abc0296d4ceae0696d912b6c63fb81a01c74e1c21752d5d627e244b49c
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-e8b039abc029
Document text
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CRIMINAL NO. 2008-0022 v. ) ) KENDALL PETERSEN, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________ ) ORDER FINCH, SENIOR JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress and Motion for a Franks Hearing filed on December 19, 2008. An evidentiary hearing was held on January 29, 2009. After consideration and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress and Motion for a Franks Hearing is DENIED. ENTERED this 3rd day of February, 2009. _________________/s/_____________________ HONORABLE RAYMOND L. FINCH SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 1:08-cr-00022-WAL-GWC Document #: 37 Filed: 02/03/09 Page 1 of 2 2 Case: 1:08-cr-00022-WAL-GWC Document #: 37 Filed: 02/03/09 Page 2 of 2