Griffin, Bridget v. Kmart Corporation
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 BRIDGET GRIFFIN, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2005-CV-0189 v. 5 5 KMART CORPORATION, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: K. Glenda Cameron, Esq. Sunshine S. Benoit, Esq. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion for Partial Reconsideration (Docket No. 25). Both Plaintiff and Defendant have referred this Court to two Virgin Islands Superior Court Orders, both dated October 30, 2006, for the cases Santos v. United Corporation, Case No. SX-05-CV-0000003, and Scott v. United Corporation, Case No. SX-04-CV-0000156, which ruled on similar facts. In those orders, the Superior Court stated: The intent and effect of the . . . Order is simply to prohibit defense counsel from disseminating the Plaintiff’s enumerated confidential medical records to their client. Consequently, the Order does not, as posited by the Defendant, preclude defense counsel from discussing the records with its client. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_05-cv-00189/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_05-cv-00189-0.pdf
SHA-256 eb654b784ee1375a00e0c3b78c94a53815792097b67c0c2fca803102fe5be26a
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-eb654b784ee1
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 BRIDGET GRIFFIN, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2005-CV-0189 v. 5 5 KMART CORPORATION, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: K. Glenda Cameron, Esq. Sunshine S. Benoit, Esq. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion for Partial Reconsideration (Docket No. 25). Both Plaintiff and Defendant have referred this Court to two Virgin Islands Superior Court Orders, both dated October 30, 2006, for the cases Santos v. United Corporation, Case No. SX-05-CV-0000003, and Scott v. United Corporation, Case No. SX-04-CV-0000156, which ruled on similar facts. In those orders, the Superior Court stated: The intent and effect of the . . . Order is simply to prohibit defense counsel from disseminating the Plaintiff’s enumerated confidential medical records to their client. Consequently, the Order does not, as posited by the Defendant, preclude defense counsel from discussing the records with its client. Case: 1:05-cv-00189-JEJ Document #: 37 Filed: 07/02/07 Page 1 of 2 Griffin v. Kmart Corporation 2005-CV-0189 Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Partial Reconsideration As both parties refer to those Superior Court Orders, this Court will apply the reasoning of such orders to this case. Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED that Defendant, Kmart Corporation’s Motion for Partial Reconsideration (Docket No. 25) is DENIED. ENTER: Dated: July 2, 2007 /s/ GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:05-cv-00189-JEJ Document #: 37 Filed: 07/02/07 Page 2 of 2