Heywood v. Horwitz et al
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX DONNA HEYWOOD, Plaintiff, v. HERBERT I. HORWITZ, et al. Defendant. ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:24-cv-0017 ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER1 BEFORE THE COURT is Magistrate Judge Emile A. Henderson III’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), filed on March 17, 2026. (ECF No. 45.) The R&R recommends that Plaintiff Donna Heywood’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint, ECF No. 1, be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely and properly serve the defendants in this matter. (ECF No. 45 at 1.) On March 31, 2026, Plaintiff filed a letter in response to the R&R stating, “I w[ould] like you to dismiss the case without prejudice until I can afford to pay a private attorney.” (ECF No. 49 at 1.) The Court, having conducted a de novo review of the record and having made an independent determination finding no error, will adopt the R&R.2 Accordingly, it is hereby 1 Due to the retirement of the judge previously assigned to this case, the undersigned, exercising his authority as Chief Judge of the District Court, reassigned this case to himself on February 17, 2026. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_24-cv-00017/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_24-cv-00017-1.pdf
SHA-256 ec45b55c9b59263e86ada5a18908d1d66e01dddab769573238243499121fe21b
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-ec45b55c9b59
Document text
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX DONNA HEYWOOD, Plaintiff, v. HERBERT I. HORWITZ, et al. Defendant. ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:24-cv-0017 ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER1 BEFORE THE COURT is Magistrate Judge Emile A. Henderson III’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), filed on March 17, 2026. (ECF No. 45.) The R&R recommends that Plaintiff Donna Heywood’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint, ECF No. 1, be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely and properly serve the defendants in this matter. (ECF No. 45 at 1.) On March 31, 2026, Plaintiff filed a letter in response to the R&R stating, “I w[ould] like you to dismiss the case without prejudice until I can afford to pay a private attorney.” (ECF No. 49 at 1.) The Court, having conducted a de novo review of the record and having made an independent determination finding no error, will adopt the R&R.2 Accordingly, it is hereby 1 Due to the retirement of the judge previously assigned to this case, the undersigned, exercising his authority as Chief Judge of the District Court, reassigned this case to himself on February 17, 2026. 2 See Hill v. Barnacle, 655 Fed. Appx. 142, 148 (3d Cir. 2016) (opining that the district court is not required to make separate findings or conclusions when reviewing a Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation de novo under 28 U.SC. § 636(b)) (citing Elmendorf Grafica, Inc. v. D.S. America, Inc., 48 F.3d 46, 49-50 (1st Cir. 1995) (opining that “[28 U.S.C. § 636(b)] authorizes the district court to adopt in whole as well as in part the proposed findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge. Where, as here, the magistrate judge decided on an undisputed factual record, the district court was certainly not required to rehash the magistrate judge’s reasoning. The role of the magistrate judge is ‘to relieve courts of unnecessary work.’”) (citations omitted). Case: 1:24-cv-00017-RAM-EAH Document #: 50 Filed: 04/01/26 Page 1 of 2 Heywood v. Horwitz Case No. 1:24-cv-0017 Order ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Henderson’s Report and Recommendation, filed on March 17, 2026, ECF No. 45, is APPROVED and ADOPTED as an Order of this Court as if fully set forth herein; it is further ORDERED that the Complaint filed on August 9, 2024, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to timely and properly serve the defendants in this matter; it is further ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served on Donna Heywood at her last known address provided to the Court by certified mail return receipt requested and that a copy of the return receipt shall be filed on the docket; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Dated: April 1, 2026 /s/ Robert A. Molloy _________ ROBERT A. MOLLOY Chief Judge Case: 1:24-cv-00017-RAM-EAH Document #: 50 Filed: 04/01/26 Page 2 of 2