Estate of Manuel Caraballo v. Virgin Islands Horse Racing Commission et al
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 THE ESTATE OF MANUEL CARABALLO, 5 Represented by its administratrix NURIA 5 CLEMENTE ROSADO, 5 1:08-cv-66 5 Plaintiff, 5 v. 5 5 VIRGIN ISLANDS HORSE RACING 5 COMMISSION and TRAXCO, INC., 5 5 Defendants. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Wilfredo A. Geigel, Esq. Raymond T. James, Esq., AAG Todd H. Newman, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion For Reconsideration of Order For Dismissal (Docket No. 26). The time for filing any response has expired. Having reviewed the matter and upon due consideration thereof, the Court finds that reconsideration is not warranted. The Order Dismissing Case With Prejudice (Docket No. 25) clearly states that the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. Thus, any concerns Plaintiff has or may have concerning the fact that the settlement has not yet been completed is not a basis for reconsidering the said Order. Case: 1:08-cv-00066-RLF-GWC Document #: 27 Filed: 01/20/10 Page 1 of 2 Caraballo v. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cv-00066/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cv-00066-0.pdf
SHA-256 ecf30b27b478f428a6dc200494ff44b5f6f4b1dcb7129f4345df32053fda47c3
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-ecf30b27b478
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 THE ESTATE OF MANUEL CARABALLO, 5 Represented by its administratrix NURIA 5 CLEMENTE ROSADO, 5 1:08-cv-66 5 Plaintiff, 5 v. 5 5 VIRGIN ISLANDS HORSE RACING 5 COMMISSION and TRAXCO, INC., 5 5 Defendants. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Wilfredo A. Geigel, Esq. Raymond T. James, Esq., AAG Todd H. Newman, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion For Reconsideration of Order For Dismissal (Docket No. 26). The time for filing any response has expired. Having reviewed the matter and upon due consideration thereof, the Court finds that reconsideration is not warranted. The Order Dismissing Case With Prejudice (Docket No. 25) clearly states that the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. Thus, any concerns Plaintiff has or may have concerning the fact that the settlement has not yet been completed is not a basis for reconsidering the said Order. Case: 1:08-cv-00066-RLF-GWC Document #: 27 Filed: 01/20/10 Page 1 of 2 Caraballo v. Virgin Islands Horse Racing Comm’n 1:08-cv-66 Order Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion For Reconsideration of Order For Dismissal (Docket No. 26) is DENIED. ENTER: Dated: January 20, 2010 /s/ George W. Cannon, Jr. GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:08-cv-00066-RLF-GWC Document #: 27 Filed: 01/20/10 Page 2 of 2