VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

Morton v. Testamark

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Date
2022-12-14
Pages
2
Text
Native Text

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN JAMAL MORTON, Petitioner, v. WYNNIE TESTAMARK, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:20-cv-0031 ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES: Joseph A Diruzzo, Esq. DiRuzzo & Company Ft. Lauderdale, FL For Petitioner Jamal Morton. ORDER BEFORE THE COURT is Petitioner Jamal Morton’s (“Morton”) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ECF No. 1.) Also before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, ECF No. 3, Petitioner’s “Motion for Service Upon the United States Virgin Islands Attorney General,” ECF No. 7, and Petitioner’s two motions to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 2 & 6.) The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court deny Morton’s habeas petition for failure to exhaust his state court remedies. (ECF No. 9.) Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation also recommended the Court deny the motion to appoint counsel and the motion for service upon the Virgin Islands Attorney General. See id. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_20-cv-00031/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_20-cv-00031-2.pdf

SHA-256 eff2082ec669da6cca031fa9264fd37b356b0c0bc5f19571a9604a2b299f9a7e

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-eff2082ec669

Document text

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN JAMAL MORTON, Petitioner, v. WYNNIE TESTAMARK, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:20-cv-0031 ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES: Joseph A Diruzzo, Esq. DiRuzzo & Company Ft. Lauderdale, FL For Petitioner Jamal Morton. ORDER BEFORE THE COURT is Petitioner Jamal Morton’s (“Morton”) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ECF No. 1.) Also before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, ECF No. 3, Petitioner’s “Motion for Service Upon the United States Virgin Islands Attorney General,” ECF No. 7, and Petitioner’s two motions to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 2 & 6.) The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court deny Morton’s habeas petition for failure to exhaust his state court remedies. (ECF No. 9.) Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation also recommended the Court deny the motion to appoint counsel and the motion for service upon the Virgin Islands Attorney General. See id. Lastly, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court deny the first motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, but grant the second one. (ECF No. 6.) After careful review and consideration, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion of even date, it is hereby ORDERED that the January 11, 2021 Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 9, is ADOPTED; it is further Case: 3:20-cv-00031-RAM-RM Document #: 16 Filed: 12/14/22 Page 1 of 2 ORDERED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to fully exhaust territorial court remedies; it is further ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for the appointment of counsel, ECF No. 3, is DENIED; it is further ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Service Upon the U.S. Virgin Islands Attorney General, ECF No. 7, is DENIED; it is further ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, is DENIED; and Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 6, is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED; it is further ORDERED that all pending motions in this matter are MOOT; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. Dated: December 14, 2022 /s/ _Robert A. Molloy____ ROBERT A. MOLLOY Chief Judge Case: 3:20-cv-00031-RAM-RM Document #: 16 Filed: 12/14/22 Page 2 of 2