USA v. Boliuvar et al
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ERICKSON BOLIVAR, KEISY JESUS, and YEHUDI ROBLES, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:21-cr-0025 ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER BEFORE THE COURT are the motions by the United States of America (the “United States”) and Keisy Jesus (“Jesus”) to continue the trial in this matter. (ECF Nos. 50 and 52.) For the reasons stated herein, the Court will grant the motion. The time to try this case is extended up to and including May 2, 2022. On March 3, 2022, Jesus filed his motion to continue. In the motion, Jesus states that his counsel has a conflicting criminal trial scheduled for March 14, 2022, in the District of Puerto Rico. (ECF No. 50 at 1.) Jesus argues that the conflicting case is an older case, which takes precedence over newer cases. Id. Thereafter, on March 4, 2022, the United States filed its motion to continue. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_21-cr-00025/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_21-cr-00025-0.pdf
SHA-256 f057dcda883b86d3277d0518faaacb5497a1d500e1722907d3e0eed6a9c0bd63
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-f057dcda883b
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ERICKSON BOLIVAR, KEISY JESUS, and YEHUDI ROBLES, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:21-cr-0025 ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER BEFORE THE COURT are the motions by the United States of America (the “United States”) and Keisy Jesus (“Jesus”) to continue the trial in this matter. (ECF Nos. 50 and 52.) For the reasons stated herein, the Court will grant the motion. The time to try this case is extended up to and including May 2, 2022. On March 3, 2022, Jesus filed his motion to continue. In the motion, Jesus states that his counsel has a conflicting criminal trial scheduled for March 14, 2022, in the District of Puerto Rico. (ECF No. 50 at 1.) Jesus argues that the conflicting case is an older case, which takes precedence over newer cases. Id. Thereafter, on March 4, 2022, the United States filed its motion to continue. In its motion, the United States asserts that it has not yet received the laboratory analysis for evidence submitted to the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) Laboratory in this matter. (ECF No. 52 at 2.) The United States further asserts that counsel for the United States has a trial and multiple hearings during the week of March 7, 2022, and a conflicting trial scheduled for March 14, 2022. Id. While the Speedy Trial Act requires that defendants be tried within seventy days of indictment, the Court specifically finds that extending this period would be in the best interest of justice. Here, an extension of time is necessary to allow the DEA to complete and return an analysis of evidence in this case. An extension is further warranted for the United States and Jesus to maintain continuity of counsel, which would be otherwise denied due to scheduling conflicts. Case: 3:21-cr-00025-RAM-RM Document #: 53 Filed: 03/08/22 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Bolivar et al. Case No.: 3:21-cr-0025 Order Under the Speedy Trial Act, courts should consider “[w]hether the failure to grant such a continuance in a case which . . . would unreasonably deny the defendant or the Government continuity of counsel, or would deny counsel for the defendant or the attorney for the Government the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation.” 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). Consistent with these concerns, the courts have granted continuances due to delays in receiving evidence and scheduling conflicts. See United States v. Stallings, 701 F. App'x 164, 170-71 (3d Cir. 2017)(upholding an ends of justice continuance based in part on counsel’s family emergency and scheduling conflicts); United States v. Van Chase, 137 F.3d 579, 583 (8th Cir. 1998)(suggesting that a continuance granted due to “a testing backlog at the FBI labs” was proper). Furthermore, in response to the current conditions in the COVID-19 pandemic, the undersigned, as Chief Judge of the District Court of the Virgin Islands, issued a general order concerning operations of the Court on February 28, 2022, deeming the time period of March 1, 2022 through March 31, 2022, to be “excluded time” under the Speedy Trial Act for purposes of determining when an information or indictment must be filed or when a trial must commence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).1 The Court hereby fully incorporates the findings from the Court’s Thirty-Fourth Operations Order as fully stated herein. To date, the COVID-19 virus has claimed more than 957,000 lives in the United States (109 of which have been in the U.S. Virgin Islands). COVID-19 continues to present an unpredictable threat to public health and safety, as shown in the recent surge in COVID-19 cases both in the continental United States and the Virgin Islands. As a multi-defendant case, this case presents significant challenges for the Court to comply with social distancing guidelines during the jury trial. Practical considerations would require additional spacing for Defendants, counsel, and jurors—and the potential for additional jurors in the courtroom. As such, the Court finds that extending the period within which Defendants may be tried under the Speedy Trial Act is necessary for the protection and well-being of the Defendant, 1 https://www.vid.uscourts.gov/sites/vid/files/general-ordes/Thirty- Fourth%20Order%20Concerning%20Court%20Operations%20During%20COVID%20Outbreak.pdf Case: 3:21-cr-00025-RAM-RM Document #: 53 Filed: 03/08/22 Page 2 of 3 United States v. Bolivar et al. Case No.: 3:21-cr-0025 Order the jury, the prosecutors, the witnesses, the Court’s personnel, and the general public at large. The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that the United States’ and Defendant Jesus’ motions to continue, ECF Nos. 50 and 52, are GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that the time beginning from the date of this order granting an extension through May 2, 2022, shall be excluded in computing the time within which the trial in this matter must be initiated pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161; it is further ORDERED that the parties SHALL file and serve a pre-trial brief no later than April 25, 2022, which shall include the following: (a) proposed list of witnesses; (b) proposed list of exhibits; (c) estimated length of case-in-chief and case-in-defense; (d) proposed non- standard voir dire questions; and (e) proposed non-standard jury instructions related to the elements of the charges and defenses; it is further ORDERED that the parties shall provide the Clerk of Court with a USB Flash Drive containing electronic versions of exhibits no later than April 27, 2022;2 and it is further ORDERED that the jury selection and trial in this matter previously scheduled for March 14, 2022, are RESCHEDULED to commence promptly at 9:00 A.M. on May 2, 2022, in St. Thomas Courtroom 1. Dated: March 8, 2022 /s/ Robert A . Molloy ROBERT A. MOLLOY Chief Judge 2 Counsel are advised to consult with Court technical staff to determine the proper format for saving electronic versions of exhibits. The Government’s trial exhibits shall be labelled sequentially beginning with Government’s Exhibit 1. Defense exhibits shall be labelled sequentially beginning with Defense Exhibit A. Case: 3:21-cr-00025-RAM-RM Document #: 53 Filed: 03/08/22 Page 3 of 3