USVI Public Records

Document text

1 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Mid-Year Report University of the Virgin Islands Board of Trustees Meeting March 12, 2005 Prepared by: Office of Institution Research and Planning 2 Spring 2005 – Mid-Year Report „ Key Performance Indicators „ Spring Enrollment „ Financial „ Research „ Development „ Facilities 3 Enrollment Indicators Spring 2005 4 Undergraduate & Graduate Enrollment Spring 2003-2005 291 2,186 2,477 279 2,313 2,592 231 2,276 2,507 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 2003 2004 2005 Graduate Ugrads Total „ Total UG/G Spring 2005 Enrollment Down 3.3% from Spring 2004 „ Fewer Applications „ Decline in Part-time Retention on St Croix (34%/ Fall 2004) „ Need to improve Admission Process „ Fewer Graduate Cohort Programs (e.g. St. Marteen) „ Undergraduate down 1.6% „ Graduate down 17% St Thomas Campus: St. Thomas + BVI + Distance Learning 5 Student Credit Hours (All) Spring 2003-2005 1,205 21,537 22,742 1,417 23,281 24,698 1,243 23,006 24,249 0 7,000 14,000 21,000 28,000 2003 2004 2005 Graduate UG Total ■Credit Hours for Spring 2005 Down 1.8% from Spring 2004 ƒ No Fiscal Impact on UVI – due to increase in tuition + fees ƒ Undergraduate down 1.2% ƒ St Croix down 4% ƒ St Thomas up 1.2% ƒ Graduate down 12.3% ƒ St Croix down 13.5% ƒ St Thomas down 11.5% 6 FTE – UG & Graduate Enrollment Spring 2003-2005 „ Total FTE for Spring 2005 down 1.5% over Spring 2004 „ Undergraduate FTE (12hrs) down 0.5% over Spring 2004 „ Graduate FTE (9hrs) down 13.5% over Spring 2004 134 1,597 1,731 155 1,729 1,884 134 1,721 1,855 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2003 2004 2005 Graduate FTE Ugrad FTE Total FTE 7 Enrollment - Full vs. Part-Time (All) Spring 2003-2005 1,045 1,432 2,477 1,157 1,435 2,592 1,168 1,339 2,507 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 2003 2004 2005 Full-Time Part-Time Total „ FT for Spring 2005 Up 1% over Spring 2004 „ St Croix down, 1.97% „ St Thomas up, 2.5% „ PT Down for Spring 2005, 6.7% over Spring 2004 „ St Croix down, 10.97 % „ St Thomas down, 2.98 % „ Full v Part time ratio „ 2005: 1:1.15 „ 2004: 1:1.24 „ 2003: 1:1.37 8 Admissions – New Student Activity 442 277 206 445 309 213 392 257 169 0 250 500 2003 2004 2005 Apps Accepted Enrolled „ Spring 2005 Yield 66% Spring 2004 Yield 69% Spring 2003 Yield 63% „ Freshmen for Spring 2005 Down 13.3% Over Spring 2004 „ Enrolled v. Acceptance ratio „ 2005: 1:1.52 „ 2004: 1:1.45 „ 2003: 1:1.34 „ Transfers for Spring 2005 Down 2.63% Over Spring 2004 „ 37 Transfers in Spring 2005 „ 31 Transfers in Spring 2000 Freshmen & Transfers Spring 2003 - 2005 9 Student Indicators 10 Student Profile Spring 2005 vs. 2004 „ 77% Female UG’s, no change „ 23% Males UG’s, no change „ Average Age - Undergraduates „ FT = 22.1 Yrs, Down from 23 Yrs „ PT = 31.2 Yrs Down from 32.8 Yrs „ Residency (All) „ In-Territory = 91%, down from 93% „ Out-of-Territory = 9%, up from 7% 11 Student Profile Spring 2005 vs. 2004 „ Ethnicity (All) „ Black - 74%, Down from 76% „ Hispanic - 5.5%, Down from 5.7% „ White - 5.5%, Down from 5.6% „ NR Alien - 7.8%, Up from 7.3% „ Asian – Less than 1% „ American Indian, Less than 1% „ Other – 5.9%, Up from 4% „ New Freshmen „ 65 % Taking Skills vs. 72 % in Spring 2004 „ Student/Faculty Ratio „ 12:1 (Est.) 12 Financial Indicators 13 VI Operating Appropriations 21.0 18.1 24.5 24.6 23.2 $0 $10 $20 $30 Millions 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FY Annual Appropriations ■5.69% Decline Over 2003 14 Ratio of VI Appropriations to Operating Budget 64% 70% 69% 60% 68% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Percent ■6% Decline Over 2003 15 Total Operating Budget 31.0 30.1 35.7 35.3 36.2 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 Millions 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FY Annual Budget ■2.5% increase from 2003 ƒ As VI reduces support, UVI has contributed more through tuition + fee increases ■Peers – 2001-2003* UVI ranked 2003 - #8 2002 - #6 2001 - #5 (*based on subset) 16 Ratio of Tuition & Fees to Total Operating Budget 23 21 20 21 21 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Percent ■2% Increase Over 2003 17 Research Indicators 18 Externally Funded Grants and Contracts (Includes Federal and Local) 16 442 10 384 13 665 17 1.1 24 4.0 $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 Millions 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Grants and Contract Up 41% Over 2003 Peer Comparisons 2001-2003 Local Grants & Contracts UVI ranked: 2003 - #1 2002 - #2 2001 – N/A Federal Grants & Contracts UVI ranked: 2003 - #6 2002 - #5 2001 - #3 19 Development 20 Annual Fund Contributions 2002-03 to 2004-05 Actual/Target - Year-to-Date (9/1 to 02/15) 1,006 1,200 561 1,190 335 1,000 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 Thousands „ Sept 2004. – Feb. 2005 „ Decline 40% of year-to- date activity over 2003- 04 02-03 03-04 04-05 Target Actual Actual 1,000 21 Alumni Contributions 2002-03 to 2004-05 (9/1 to 02/15) 22,357 26,031 19,436 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 Giving Amount „ Sept. 2004 – Feb. 2005 „ Average Gift Up: 80% over 03-04 „ $19,436 contribution „ Avg. Gift = $262 „ Sept. 2003 – Feb. 2004 „ $26,031 contribution „ Avg. Gift = $145 02-03 03-04 04-05 22 % Alumni Who Contribute 2002-03 to 2004-05 (9/1 to 02/15) 6.70 3.70 1.50 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Percent Giving ƒ Sept. 2004 – Feb. 2005 ƒ Decline 2.2% over 03/04 ƒ Number of Alumni who have contributed: 74 ƒ Sept. 2003 - Feb. 2004 ƒ Decline 3% over 02/03 ƒ Number of Alumni who have contributed: 180 02-03 03-04 04-05 23 % Trustees Who Contribute 2002-03 to 2004-05 (9/1 to 02/15) 50 58 50 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent Giving „ Sept. 2004 – Feb. 2005: Giving, $9,148 „ 7/14 or 50% „ Avg. Contribution: $1,307 „ Sept. 2003 – Feb. 2004 Giving, $7,200 „ 7/12 or 58% „ Avg. Contribution: $1,029 02-03 03-04 04-05 24 Endowment Market Value 26.0 24.7 23.4 26.1 30.2 $0 $10 $20 $30 Millions 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 UVI Endowment 15.7% increase over 2000 Peer Analysis 2001-2003 UVI ranked: 2003 - #1 2002 - N/A 2001 - N/A 2004 is an un-audited report 25 Facilities Maintenance* „ Volume of Deferred Maintenance „ 1999 - $27M „ 2001 - $17M „ 2004 - $ 7M „ Physical Condition of Facilities „ Classrooms „ 1999 – Poor „ 2004 – Very Good „ Physical Condition of Facilities „ Faculty Offices „ 1999 – Fair „ 2004 – Good „ Dormitories „ 1999 – Poor/Fair „ 2004 – Very Good „ Assembly Halls/Grounds „ 1999 – Fair „ 2004 – Very Good „ Faculty/Admin Residences „ 1999 – Fair „ 2004 – Good *Based on 1999 Facilities Needs Assessment 26 Appendix A UVI vs. Peer Institutions „ Peer Institutions „ 21 Universities „ Enrollment Less Than 5,000 „ Public, State Supported „ 10 HBCU’s „ 2 Islands Universities – Guam, Hawaii * Private University 27 Appendix B UVI Peer Institutions (21) „ALBANY STATE UNIVERSITY „MISSISSIPPI UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN „ALCORN STATE UNIVERSITY „MISSISSIPPI VALLEYSTATE UNIVERSITY „COPPIN STATE UNIVERSITY „SAVANNAH STATE UNIVERSITY „DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY „SUL ROSS STATE „EASTERN NEW MEXICO UNIV.-MAIN CAMPUS „THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS OF THE PERMIAN BASIN „ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY „UNIVERSITY OF GUAM „FORT VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY „UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT HILO „FRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY „UNIVERSITY OF MONTEVALLO „INTER AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO* „UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINAT AT PEMBROKE „KENTUCK STATE UNIVERSITY „WINSTON-SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY 28 Thank you! Office of Institutional Research and Planning