DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 IDONA WALLACE, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2002-CV-0107 v. 5 5 KMART CORPORATION, 5 5 Defendant. 5 ________________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Yvette Ross-Edwards, Esq. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Stipulation Regarding Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Provide Signed Medical Authorizations (Docket No. 45). At issue is Plaintiff’s refusal to provide the “HIPAA Authorizations” in the absence of a confidentiality agreement, and Defendant’s objection to the scope of Plaintiff’s proposed confidentiality agreement. Defendant cites the paragraph of Plaintiff’s proposed confidentiality agreement that contains the definition of confidential information for purposes of the agreement. It is clear Case: 1:02-cv-00107-DWA-GWC Document #: 55 Filed: 02/21/08 Page 1 of 5 Wallace v. Kmart Corp. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_02-cv-00107/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_02-cv-00107-0.pdf
SHA-256 f3431a69f31ea633bb3689459b9645539e4d739417e474363d0097dee8a3eee9
Re-using this document
A work of the United States Government. Not subject to copyright in the United States under 17 U.S.C. § 105, and therefore in the public domain from the moment it was created.
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-f3431a69f31e
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 IDONA WALLACE, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 2002-CV-0107 v. 5 5 KMART CORPORATION, 5 5 Defendant. 5 ________________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Yvette Ross-Edwards, Esq. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Stipulation Regarding Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Provide Signed Medical Authorizations (Docket No. 45). At issue is Plaintiff’s refusal to provide the “HIPAA Authorizations” in the absence of a confidentiality agreement, and Defendant’s objection to the scope of Plaintiff’s proposed confidentiality agreement. Defendant cites the paragraph of Plaintiff’s proposed confidentiality agreement that contains the definition of confidential information for purposes of the agreement. It is clear Case: 1:02-cv-00107-DWA-GWC Document #: 55 Filed: 02/21/08 Page 1 of 5 Wallace v. Kmart Corp. 2002-CV-0107 Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Compel from this cited definition that Plaintiff seeks to protect all of her medical and psychological records. This Court previously has held that, where a party’s physical condition is a factor or element of the party’s claims, no patient-physician privilege exists, pursuant to V.I. Code Ann. tit. 5 § 855. Section 855 codifies the physician-patient privilege in the Virgin Islands. However, subparagraph four (4) of said statute, provides, in pertinent part: “There is no privilege under this section in an action in which the condition of the patient is an element or factor of the claim or defense of the patient . . . .“ V.I. Code Ann. tit. 5 § 855(4) (1997). The plain meaning of the provision is that there is no physician-patient privilege in an action where the condition of the patient is an element or factor of the claim or defense of such patient. In other words, where the “condition” of a patient (as defined by the statute) is an element or factor of a claim or defense of that patient in a civil action, there is no physician-patient privilege in that action. Since no physician-patient privilege exists in this matter, all Plaintiff’s medical records are not privileged nor require confidential treatment. However, because alcohol and drug abuse treatment, mental health, and AIDS/HIV diagnosis and/or treatment are protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Court Case: 1:02-cv-00107-DWA-GWC Document #: 55 Filed: 02/21/08 Page 2 of 5 Wallace v. Kmart Corp. 2002-CV-0107 Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Compel will order that such information be subject to a confidentiality agreement. The parties’ confidentiality agreement shall incorporate the provisions as ordered herein. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Provide Signed Medical Authorizations (Docket No. 45) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff shall, within ten (10) days, execute what Defendant refers to as the HIPAA Authorizations, which may include the release of information concerning alcohol and/or drug abuse treatment and/or mental health and/or AIDS- or HIV-related condition, diagnosis, and/or treatment. 3. The parties shall, within ten (10) days, execute a confidentiality agreement in accordance with the following provisions: a. The words contract, agreement, medical records, and Sexually Transmitted Disease [sic] shall be removed from the definition of “confidential information.” b. Access to all alcohol and/or drug abuse treatment and/or mental health and/or AIDS- or HIV-related information shall be limited to just those attorneys and support staff directly involved in preparation Case: 1:02-cv-00107-DWA-GWC Document #: 55 Filed: 02/21/08 Page 3 of 5 Wallace v. Kmart Corp. 2002-CV-0107 Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Compel of this case, and counsel for Defendant shall not allow representatives of Defendant access to the information. c. Counsel for Defendant may reveal the alcohol and/or drug abuse and/or mental health and/or AIDS- or HIV-related information to the minimum number of Defendant’s experts necessary to evaluate the information and prepare the case. d. All alcohol and/or drug abuse and/or mental health and/or AIDS- or HIV-related information shall be kept in separate envelopes on the front of which shall be affixed a notice stating its confidential nature, and counsel for Defendant shall inform each person to whom such information is disclosed of its confidential nature and that person's duties under the Confidentiality Agreement entered in this matter. e. At the conclusion of legal proceedings between the parties, counsel for Defendant shall return all alcohol and/or drug treatment and/or mental health and/or AIDS- or HIV-related information to Plaintiff. Case: 1:02-cv-00107-DWA-GWC Document #: 55 Filed: 02/21/08 Page 4 of 5 Wallace v. Kmart Corp. 2002-CV-0107 Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Compel ENTER: Dated: February 21, 2008 /s/ GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:02-cv-00107-DWA-GWC Document #: 55 Filed: 02/21/08 Page 5 of 5