VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

Douglas , Hugo & Associates LLC v. Moravian Church

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Date
2008-07-30
Pages
4
Text
Native Text

FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS & JOHN HUGO DOUGLAS & ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, v. VIRGIN ISLANDS CONFERENCE, MORAVIAN CHURCH MISSION FOR THE EVANGELICAL BROTHERS UNITED, VIRGIN ISLANDS PORT AUTHORITY, and AMERICAN VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LTD, Defendants. ___________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2007-28 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Desmond L Maynard, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the plaintiff, Samuel T. Grey, Esq. St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Virgin Islands Conference and the Moravian Church Mission for the Evangelical Brothers United, Henry V Carr, III, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the Virgin Islands Port Authority, David A Bornn, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For American Virgin Enterprises, Ltd. Case: 3:07-cv-00028-CVG-GWB Document #: 81 Filed: 07/30/08 Page 1 of 4 Hugo Douglas & Assocs. v. V.I. Conference, et al. Civil No. 2007-28 Order ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. Before the Court is the motion of the Moravian Church Mission for the Evangelical Brothers United (the “Church”) to dismiss the above-captioned matter. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_07-cv-00028/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_07-cv-00028-0.pdf

SHA-256 f348a530b509d8c8f8c65cfe2119f6740ae99a2932c0382dbccdb06479771448

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-f348a530b509

Document text

FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS & JOHN HUGO DOUGLAS & ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, v. VIRGIN ISLANDS CONFERENCE, MORAVIAN CHURCH MISSION FOR THE EVANGELICAL BROTHERS UNITED, VIRGIN ISLANDS PORT AUTHORITY, and AMERICAN VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LTD, Defendants. ___________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2007-28 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Desmond L Maynard, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the plaintiff, Samuel T. Grey, Esq. St. Croix, U.S.V.I. For the Virgin Islands Conference and the Moravian Church Mission for the Evangelical Brothers United, Henry V Carr, III, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the Virgin Islands Port Authority, David A Bornn, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For American Virgin Enterprises, Ltd. Case: 3:07-cv-00028-CVG-GWB Document #: 81 Filed: 07/30/08 Page 1 of 4 Hugo Douglas & Assocs. v. V.I. Conference, et al. Civil No. 2007-28 Order ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. Before the Court is the motion of the Moravian Church Mission for the Evangelical Brothers United (the “Church”) to dismiss the above-captioned matter. Hugo Douglas & Associates, LLC (“Hugo”) is a corporation incorporated in Maryland with its principal place in Maryland. On February 7, 2007, Hugo commenced this action against the Church, among other defendants. Count One of the complaint alleges breach of contract, claiming the defendants failed to pay Hugo for certain architectural and engineering services Hugo provided. Count Two is a claim for quantum meruit. The third and final count alleges that Hugo relied to its detriment on the defendants’ promise to pay. Pursuant to title 13, section 2008 of the Virgin Islands Code (“Section 2008(a)”), “[a] foreign limited liability company transacting business in the Virgin Islands may not maintain an action or proceeding in the Virgin Islands unless it has a certificate of authority to transact business in the Virgin Case: 3:07-cv-00028-CVG-GWB Document #: 81 Filed: 07/30/08 Page 2 of 4 Hugo Douglas & Assocs. v. V.I. Conference, et al. Civil No. 2007-28 Order 1 “A foreign limited liability company may apply for a certificate of authority to transact business in the Virgin Islands by delivering an application to the office of the Lieutenant Governor . . . .” 13 V.I.C. § 2002(a) (1998). Islands.”1 V.I. CODE ANN. tit. 13, § 2008(a) (1998). The term ‘foreign limited liability company’ is defined as an unincorporated entity organized under laws other than the laws of the Virgin Islands which afford limited liability to its owners comparable to the liability under section 1303 of this chapter and is not required to obtain a certificate of authority to transact business under any law of the Virgin Islands other than this chapter. Id. at § 1102(h) (1998). The Church argues that dismissal is appropriate because Hugo lacks the capacity to sue in the Virgin Islands. It contends that Hugo is a “foreign limited liability company,” as defined in title 13, section 1102(h) of the Virgin Islands Code (“Section 1102(h)”). The Church further asserts that Hugo does not possess a certificate of authority to transact business in the Virgin Islands. Accordingly, the Church concludes, Section 2008(a) precludes Hugo from commencing a law suit in the Virgin Islands. In support of its motion, the Church has submitted an affidavit of Denise Johannes, Director of the Division of Corporation and Trademark of the Office of the Lieutenant Governor. It states that, “after a careful search of our records, it was determined that the entity, HUGO DENNIS AND ASSOCIATES, LLC, is not registered with our office as a foreign Case: 3:07-cv-00028-CVG-GWB Document #: 81 Filed: 07/30/08 Page 3 of 4 Hugo Douglas & Assocs. v. V.I. Conference, et al. Civil No. 2007-28 Order or domestic limited liability company.” (Johannes Aff. ¶ 2, Nov. 20, 2007.) Significantly, Hugo Dennis, LLC is not a party to this action. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is DENIED; it is further ORDERED that the hearing on the motion to dismiss, currently scheduled for August 22, 2008, is CANCELLED; and it is further ORDERED that the Church’s motion to reschedule the August 22, 2008, hearing is DENIED as moot. S\ CURTIS V. GÓMEZ Chief Judge Case: 3:07-cv-00028-CVG-GWB Document #: 81 Filed: 07/30/08 Page 4 of 4