Paul Abney, Dr. v. University of The Virgin Islands
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 DR. PAUL ABNEY, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:08-cv-116 5 v. 5 5 UNIVERSITY OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Marie E. Thomas-Griffith, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Discovery (Docket No. 29). The time for filing a response to said motion has expired. Plaintiff claims that Defendant never responded to written discovery propounded on October 6, 2009. Motion at 1. A review of the record reveals that Defendant has filed notices of service of answers to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and responses to Plaintiff’s demand for production of documents (Docket Nos. 30 and 31, respectively). Consequently, the Court finds the motion moot. Case: 1:08-cv-00116-AET-GWC Document #: 32 Filed: 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2 Abney v. University of the Virgin Islands 1:08-cv-116 Order Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Discovery (Docket No. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cv-00116/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-1_08-cv-00116-0.pdf
SHA-256 f3de936a5ce1a55d016a474570f34e002f2da8637519c505b2132d490252e89c
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-f3de936a5ce1
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX 5 DR. PAUL ABNEY, 5 5 Plaintiff, 5 1:08-cv-116 5 v. 5 5 UNIVERSITY OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, 5 5 Defendant. 5 __________________________________________5 TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq. Marie E. Thomas-Griffith, Esq. ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Discovery (Docket No. 29). The time for filing a response to said motion has expired. Plaintiff claims that Defendant never responded to written discovery propounded on October 6, 2009. Motion at 1. A review of the record reveals that Defendant has filed notices of service of answers to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and responses to Plaintiff’s demand for production of documents (Docket Nos. 30 and 31, respectively). Consequently, the Court finds the motion moot. Case: 1:08-cv-00116-AET-GWC Document #: 32 Filed: 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2 Abney v. University of the Virgin Islands 1:08-cv-116 Order Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Discovery (Docket No. 29) is DENIED AS MOOT. ENTER: Dated: February 11, 2010 /s/ George W. Cannon, Jr. GEORGE W. CANNON, JR. U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 1:08-cv-00116-AET-GWC Document #: 32 Filed: 02/11/10 Page 2 of 2