Castellanos, Leandro Parra v. United States of America
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN LEANDRO PARRA CASTELLANOS ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL NO. 2001/0129 v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant United States of America motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficiency of process and insufficiency of service of process, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), 12(b)(4) and 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, regarding Plaintiff’s jewelry, electronic equipment and clothing. After careful consideration and review and for the reasons expressed in Defendant’s motion, it is hereby, ORDERED that Defendant’s motions are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED and the case CLOSED. ENTER: DATED: August 27, 2007 /s/ Raymond L. Finch r sp RAYMOND L. FINCH U.S. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_01-cv-00129/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_01-cv-00129-1.pdf
SHA-256 f8bca4fa9eaa3e0965cbcdc92a23b93e8e4485a36b48b45178d667f26be9a88b
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-f8bca4fa9eaa
Document text
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN LEANDRO PARRA CASTELLANOS ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL NO. 2001/0129 v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant United States of America motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficiency of process and insufficiency of service of process, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), 12(b)(4) and 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, regarding Plaintiff’s jewelry, electronic equipment and clothing. After careful consideration and review and for the reasons expressed in Defendant’s motion, it is hereby, ORDERED that Defendant’s motions are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED and the case CLOSED. ENTER: DATED: August 27, 2007 /s/ Raymond L. Finch r sp RAYMOND L. FINCH U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Case: 3:01-cv-00129-RLF Document #: 24 Filed: 08/27/07 Page 1 of 1