VI Update

USVI Public Records

A VI Update Project · Brian LoudenThe territory’s public record — kept public.

Bickley vs. Greg Lewis, et. al.

Collection
Courts
Sub-shelf
District Court of the Virgin Islands (federal)
Kind
Court Record
Date
2008-12-22
Pages
2
Text
Native Text

FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS & ST. JOHN BRUCE BICKLEY, Plaintiff, v. GREG LEWIS; LAURA LEWIS; THE S/V “SEA CHATEAU”, Hull Identification No. 7, her tackle, engines, tender, sails and equipments; DENNIS VOLLMER d/b/a 1ST CLASS YACHT CHARTERS, and D’LA MER CHARTERS, LLC, Defendants. ______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2007-155 ATTORNEYS: A. Jeffrey Weiss, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the plaintiff. Douglas L. Capdeville, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For defendants Greg Lewis, Laura Lewis and S/V “Sea Chateau”, Hull Identification No. 7, her tackle, engines, tender, sails and equipments. Charles S. Russell, Jr., Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For defendants Dennis Vollmer d/b/a First Class Yacht Charters and D’La Mer Charters, LLC. ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. …

Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works

Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_07-cv-00155/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_07-cv-00155-0.pdf

SHA-256 f988158178ba7111dd494bdc277d2deb6cf9548949daa9a274b6a1556abe92f1

Re-using this document

two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it

Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.

Archive identifier LF-f988158178ba

Document text

FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS & ST. JOHN BRUCE BICKLEY, Plaintiff, v. GREG LEWIS; LAURA LEWIS; THE S/V “SEA CHATEAU”, Hull Identification No. 7, her tackle, engines, tender, sails and equipments; DENNIS VOLLMER d/b/a 1ST CLASS YACHT CHARTERS, and D’LA MER CHARTERS, LLC, Defendants. ______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2007-155 ATTORNEYS: A. Jeffrey Weiss, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For the plaintiff. Douglas L. Capdeville, Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For defendants Greg Lewis, Laura Lewis and S/V “Sea Chateau”, Hull Identification No. 7, her tackle, engines, tender, sails and equipments. Charles S. Russell, Jr., Esq. St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. For defendants Dennis Vollmer d/b/a First Class Yacht Charters and D’La Mer Charters, LLC. ORDER GÓMEZ, C.J. On November 12, 2008, defendants Dennis Vollmer d/b/a First Class Yacht Charters and D’La Mer Charters, LLC (the “Moving Defendants”) moved for partial summary judgment against the Case: 3:07-cv-00155-CVG-RM Document #: 66 Filed: 12/22/08 Page 1 of 2 Bickley v. Lewis, et al. Civil No. 2007-155 Order plaintiff, Bruce Bickley (“Bickley”). On November 18, 2008, the Magistrate Judge entered a Minute Order, allowing Bickley to respond to the motion by December 12, 2008. On December 11, 2008, the parties filed a joint stipulation, purporting to extend Bickley’s time to respond to December 19, 2008. Bickley did not file his response by that date. Instead, on that date, the parties filed a second stipulation, purporting to allow Bickley to respond to the motion by December 24, 2008. Local Rule of Civil Procedure 56.1(c) provides, in pertinent part: (1) When a party requests an extension of time from the other party, the parties shall first make a good faith effort to negotiate a reasonable extension, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days from the deadline otherwise prescribed in this Rule. Only one such extension for the motion in question is permitted. . . . (2) If the parties cannot agree, the party seeking an extension may apply to the Court. If the Court grants the application, the parties may not thereafter alter the deadlines set by the Court without leave of the Court. LRCi 56.1(c) (2008) (emphasis supplied). The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation, entered into the docket at entry 65 on December 19, 2008, is STRICKEN. S\ CURTIS V. GÓMEZ Chief Judge Case: 3:07-cv-00155-CVG-RM Document #: 66 Filed: 12/22/08 Page 2 of 2