USA v. FAHIE
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DWAYNE FAHIE Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2015-22 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Ronald Sharpe, United States Attorney Sigrid Tejo-Sprotte, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, VI For the plaintiff, Omodare B. Jupiter, Federal Public Defender Gabriel J. Villegas, AFPD Federal Public Defender’s Office St. Thomas, VI For the defendant Dwayne Fahie. ORDER Before the Court is the motion of defendant Dwayne Fahie (“Fahie”) to dismiss Counts Two and Three of the Indictment in this matter pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act. The United States opposes the motion. The Court writes for the parties, who are familiar with the facts of this case. As such it will only recite those facts necessary to its analysis. On April 24, 2015, Fahie was arrested by officers of the Virgin Islands Police Department (“VIPD”) for unlicensed possession of a loaded firearm. Approximately twenty- Case: 3:15-cr-00022-CVG-RM Document #: 34 Filed: 08/18/15 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Fahie Crim. No. …
Download the original document · Plain text (TXT) · Browse the archive · How this archive works
Original source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-vid-3_15-cr-00022/pdf/USCOURTS-vid-3_15-cr-00022-0.pdf
SHA-256 f99f8a5d24d4de80351b752ad9a2c45e9d8997b1fc8074c9250dff96468bb0f0
Re-using this document
two independent grounds: a work of the United States Government under 17 USC 105, AND a judicial opinion, which is an edict of government and uncopyrightable by anyone including the court that wrote it
Our description, tagging, arrangement, extracted text and machine transcripts are released under CC0 1.0. We assert nothing about the document itself.
Archive identifier LF-f99f8a5d24d4
Document text
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DWAYNE FAHIE Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 2015-22 ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEYS: Ronald Sharpe, United States Attorney Sigrid Tejo-Sprotte, AUSA United States Attorney’s Office St. Thomas, VI For the plaintiff, Omodare B. Jupiter, Federal Public Defender Gabriel J. Villegas, AFPD Federal Public Defender’s Office St. Thomas, VI For the defendant Dwayne Fahie. ORDER Before the Court is the motion of defendant Dwayne Fahie (“Fahie”) to dismiss Counts Two and Three of the Indictment in this matter pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act. The United States opposes the motion. The Court writes for the parties, who are familiar with the facts of this case. As such it will only recite those facts necessary to its analysis. On April 24, 2015, Fahie was arrested by officers of the Virgin Islands Police Department (“VIPD”) for unlicensed possession of a loaded firearm. Approximately twenty- Case: 3:15-cr-00022-CVG-RM Document #: 34 Filed: 08/18/15 Page 1 of 3 United States v. Fahie Crim. No. 2015-22 Order eight (28) later, on May 22, 2015, the United States filed an Information charging Fahie with: (1) possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2); (2) possession of an unlicensed firearm while previously convicted of reckless endangerment in the first degree, in violation of V.I. CODE ANN. tit. 14, § 2253; and (3) possession of an unlicensed firearm in violation of V.I. CODE ANN. tit. 14, § 2253. The Information was docketed as criminal case number 2015-19. On June 4, 2015, the Grand Jury returned an Indictment charging Fahie with: (1) possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2); (2) possession of an unlicensed firearm while previously convicted of reckless endangerment in the first degree, in violation of V.I. CODE ANN. tit. 14, § 2253; and (3) possession of an unlicensed firearm in violation of V.I. CODE ANN. tit. 14, § 2253. The Indictment was docketed as criminal case number 2015-22. The Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, requires that “[a]ny information or indictment charging an individual with the commission of an offense shall be filed within thirty days from the date on which such individual was arrested or served with a summons in connection with such charges.” 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b)(emphasis supplied). Fahie argues that, because he was Case: 3:15-cr-00022-CVG-RM Document #: 34 Filed: 08/18/15 Page 2 of 3 United States v. Fahie Crim. No. 2015-22 Order arrested on April 24, 2015, and was not indicted until June 4, 2015, he was not charged within thirty days of his arrest on the local charges. In his motion, Fahie relies on United States v. McIntosh, 229 F. Supp. 2d 431 (D.V.I. 2002). Fahie’s reliance on McIntosh is misplaced. In McIntosh, no federal charging instrument was filed within thirty days of the defendant’s arrest. See McIntosh, 229 F. Supp. 2d at 433. Here, consistent with the Speedy Trial Act, the United States filed a charging document, an information,1 within thirty days of Fahie’s arrest. The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that Fahie’s motion to dismiss is DENIED. S\ Curtis V. Gómez District Judge 1 An information is a charging document. See, e.g., United States v. Jones, 552 F. App’x 185, 186 (3d Cir. 2014)(“The Government responded by producing a copy of the charging document (the ‘Information’) from Jones's simple assault case.”) Case: 3:15-cr-00022-CVG-RM Document #: 34 Filed: 08/18/15 Page 3 of 3